???? What is the name of the plane on your cover picture for this KZbin video.... It has two solar wings and appears to be somewhat of a glider??? I was hoping it would be covered in the video... Which was great!. The idea called my interests because with two wings you can avoid the extremely long one wing glider and still get the surface area for solar capture.... Thank you keep up the videos.!!!
@debaustin28223 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/hGSrf4CNmMeEnas
@ElectricAviation3 жыл бұрын
@@debaustin2822 Its called the Eraole
@bernie71593 жыл бұрын
@@debaustin2822 Except the lift to drag ratio of the glider decreases markedly with shorter wings, and in this case you present double trouble. That's why gliders look like an albatross which have an L/D of 20. The Duo discus glider is 45 with 18m wings, my single discus 43 with shorter wings (15m). Moreover a motor glider in saw tooth mode, say this Duo, will fly 45km for every 1km height lost with its LD of 45. On the way you try to fly streets of lift (or adjust for least sink) A bi-glider won't be the best choice for that with a low LD.
@thomascorbett29362 жыл бұрын
@@ElectricAviation that's the one that looks interesting nor the other .
@simeonhunter3 жыл бұрын
I flew the Sunseeker Duo with the owner and builder Eric Raymond in the summer of 2020; the drone footage you used at the end is from that trip. One thing about that aircraft is that you don’t need a headset; it’s absolutely silent. I’ve been theorizing about building a solar aircraft myself for years.
@nakfan3 жыл бұрын
Wow...must have been a cool experience... Thanks for sharing and good luck with a future solar plane project 👍
@philv39413 жыл бұрын
I've seen footages from the inside : it's like a dream. It's not rethoric : i mean it's exactly as if you dream to fly silently between clouds under this ultrz wide glass ceiling. Fantastic, really. Just the annoying beep to indicate your altitude was a bit noisy.
@liamwinter45123 жыл бұрын
I genuinely enjoy your content.
@ElectricAviation3 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear it
@msulemanf3 жыл бұрын
Really enjoyed this potted history of solar aircraft. Dense with facts and figures and nice production values without flashy padding. Brilliant - if only more of youtube was like this.
@jietsedemars55313 жыл бұрын
Your YT channel is sincerely underrated. I've been daydreaming about this since a while ago. The things I'm wondering are: - What will be the reduction in drag if an electric aircraft flies at an altitude of 18 km (same speed but higher range)? - What will be the multiplier of the solar panel efficiency at this level (is it linear with what you mentioned in the video)? - Will electric motors achieve higher efficiency levels due to the lower operating temperature (- 60 °C)? Anyway, I really love your channel as I share the same ideas/thoughts as you. Keep up the good work!!
@markstevens17293 жыл бұрын
“And with this, the video is concluded.” KZbin is not worthy of such direct language.
@bromnader51963 жыл бұрын
Yes I was shocked by such direct language. It's so offensive and colonialist. (sarcasm)
@ThreeWheelTherapy3 жыл бұрын
The planes based on sailplanes can shut down the motor and stow or feather the props, and use thermaling under pilot control. The charge time is constant so the range is greatly extended
@burnsmatkin96062 жыл бұрын
No. Solar is so weak, you actually think it would extend range in any significant way? Thermaling, as in riding the natural lift like a glider? I can see a 400 passenger plane thermaling. Is that even a word?
@ThreeWheelTherapy2 жыл бұрын
@@burnsmatkin9606 apparently you are not aware of the newest updates to solar electricity generation materials. They are lighter and produce more electricity per square inch. That's being used many applications now. The roof panels on an rv can charge the batteries during the day so power is available all night. It is very impressive. There are many other applications of this tech out there. It does take moserate scaling to be useful.
@njm32113 жыл бұрын
Very informative and well presented not to mention that I can actually hear the video without maximizing the volume and putting my ear to the speaker. Look forward to more content.
@oxcart41723 жыл бұрын
Fascinating! It will be incredible to see all the developments in EA over the coming years on this channel. Good luck!
Maybe a solar powered hybrid airship would be better for cargo. A large surface area, less power requirement, better safety, meaningfull cargo capacity, autonomous operation...
@Kimoto5043 жыл бұрын
Whenever someone says "watch till the end", I almost always stop watching entirely. Let the merit of your content and presentation keep the viewer's attention.
@hughwaller67893 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the great information, and clear simple formulas.
@darnation86503 жыл бұрын
If the next generation of batteries improve power density by 30%, and the solar panels improve to 40% efficiency, this becomes an exciting prospect for solar powered aviation.
@ElectricAviation3 жыл бұрын
indeed
@spdynamics2 жыл бұрын
Actually power density is already more than enough, it's gravimetric density that will deliver a step change, though not huge, it would have an impact.
@willcall943111 ай бұрын
It’s good to see Rutan designs redesigned and used for modern material research and development purposes. Hopefully one day solar aircraft will be able to transition through the 200 knot airspeed envelope . That will be a game changer.
@ilkoderez6013 жыл бұрын
You have a really great channel. Definitely one of my top 10 favorite! THANK YOU
@ElectricAviation3 жыл бұрын
Wow, thanks!
@chubbymoth58103 жыл бұрын
Very interesting. I hope to see more of such quality content, so subscribed to your channel.
@bernardthedisappointedowl69383 жыл бұрын
Brilliant episode, thanks for all you hard work putting this together, excellent, ^oo^
@Lovingkindness.3 жыл бұрын
9:57 Don’t forget the loss from angle of incidence. You only get the full potential when the PV cells are near perpendicular to the sun. You will have much less power generated than you mention.
@EnlightenedSavage2 жыл бұрын
You don't need direct sunlight. The losses at most angles are not significant.
@technomad90713 жыл бұрын
love your vids! informative, friendly and easy to watch, good luck with the v's there very vexing
@ElectricAviation3 жыл бұрын
Glad you like them!
@zero-ff2 жыл бұрын
Out of all the aircrafts, the application of solar cells/film and more energy-dense battery systems on powered gliders seems perfectly feasible. Thank you so much for all the super informative videos. Love from Andaman and Nicobar islands, India 💖. Looking forward to new videos. Loved the videos on eVTOLs as well.
@winfriedrijssenbeek1 Жыл бұрын
Very good explanation, and just one thought: today there are bifacial solar systems that can be placed vertically and allow for different configurations. Possibly interesting for typical quad drones?
@pctrashtalk20693 жыл бұрын
A tandem wing layout like the Rutan Quickie designs with larger wings might be a good one since you wing span can be shorter.
@nielsheesernielsen36143 жыл бұрын
I had the same thought of converting a old plane that already offers very good efficiency and long range. The landing gear on the Quickie is also a cool solution for simplicity and efficiency. Also looking forward to see performance of the Aptera EV will actually be and how the consumption is will be compared to similar sized aircrafts.
@nathanchildress55963 жыл бұрын
I think a cargo plane with a hybrid drivetrain using fuel for takeoff and gaining altitude with alternators to charge the batteries and using only electricity during cruise would be a great solution.
@shahbazfawbush3 жыл бұрын
Better yet an electric booster unit that attaches to the electric plane which then helps the plane get to altitude and then detaches and returns to base.
@z_actual3 жыл бұрын
You could consider flying in ground effect, which greatly reduces induced drag and the structural weight required for large wing spans. At around 33 lbs per hp a regular rectangle wing needs low aspect ratio or the machine simply climbs out of ground effect, which we don't want if any useful speed is sought. Another inspiration is in the same light is Chance Vought's V173, which used tip mounted propellers to counter tip vortices on a low aspect ratio wing planned around an adjusted circle (so AR of 1.27) which aligned all of the 25% chords in a straight line. Except here electric propulsion doesnt require extensive transmission that an IC powered machine required.
@ElectricAviation3 жыл бұрын
Brilliant
@dejayrezme86173 жыл бұрын
I was just learning about WIG crafts today and am wondering if this could work with electric and solar! I am currently designing a solar powered trimaran cruiser which should work fine but only goes 6-8 knots. Which is fine for my purposes really, living aboard on a nice off-grid home with plenty of power for a comfortable home. But WIGs are kind of interesting. You'd fly much faster for shorter amounts of time and then recharge. I'd be totally fine with slower airplane speeds of 50 knots and larger wingspans for more solar power. But I'd like it at least to be suitable for traveling and camping like in a camper van. So maybe an interior space of 1.6m width and 4m length plus cockpit? Is that already crazy? Of course anchoring or docking at a marina then becomes a problem too. Also WIG can be classified as boats as long as they don't fly higher than 150m, so it would be easier to build and fly. And building yourself would be much more affordable to me.
@pashakdescilly75173 жыл бұрын
If glider design is the basis, well, a skilled pilot can use thermals and greatly increase range
@MrMakulit19593 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video. Im a fan of anything that flies and the potential of electric planes just gets better and better. Im really loving solar planes and the idea of a fast fun solar day sailer powered sail plane is definitely an idea whose time has come.
@jbrownson3 жыл бұрын
Love your videos, thanks!
@ElectricAviation3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@macrumpton3 жыл бұрын
I would think that LTA craft like blimps and dirigibles would better than airplanes for solar. Google SolarShip for an example. They have a lot more surface area for solar panels, a cargo capacity that is actually useful unlike other solar planes, and they need far less power to stay aloft. They would also be able to easily go up into the jet stream for greater speed with little additional power usage. A solar aerial cruise ship is within our current technology, although cargo is probably a better use case since speed is not as much an issue. Perhaps a dirigible casino would be a early use case.
@justinklenk3 жыл бұрын
Totally, man. 👍
@DavidElzeitsinfill3 жыл бұрын
I certainly think they would but I think it's just the challenge of making something that is catharized as a "fixed wing aircraft" that is the idea. And like formula one race cars it's the advances in technology that are important and may be adopted in civilian aircraft.
@markthomasson50773 жыл бұрын
Exactly my thoughts. Now fill it with hydrogen, develop a solar cell that converts sunlight and moisture from the air into hydrogen and you have it.
@dejayrezme86173 жыл бұрын
Maybe you could combine that "Flying-V" airplane / flying wing aircraft with a blimp? Shape the blimp not ling a blimp but like a wing.
@DavidElzeitsinfill3 жыл бұрын
@@dejayrezme8617 ya. I don't know if that somehow changes the design challenge but its a good idea to make a compressed helium ridged structure. This is an example of a blow up plane made decades ago. kzbin.info/www/bejne/fXuQZaiNrLZofqM
@williamwilliam7282 жыл бұрын
What a wonderfully researched video. Thank you so much for the tutorial. This is a fabulous subject and every day it seems we are progressing towards a more efficient and cleaner form of aviation.
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your appreciation
@kirkjohnson93533 жыл бұрын
Very much enjoyed this video. Great work.
@ElectricAviation3 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear it!
@jacobdavidcunningham14403 жыл бұрын
0:44 dang I gotta use integration? wolfram alpha will save me
@markplain25553 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video man. As a glider pilot - I look forward to flying the next gen solar powered crafts.
@ElectricAviation3 жыл бұрын
You and me both!
@stephenmabry28663 жыл бұрын
Yes, a tandem wing design is the answer ( like Vahana ).
@johndemeritt34603 жыл бұрын
I'm not familiar with Vahana, but a derivative of the Beech Staggerwing design could be both very efficient and strikingly beautiful. The big problem here is not the technology, but innovation -- that is, convincing ordinary people that this is the best solution to a problem they have, and that this solution is something they can understand and afford. For the moment, a C-17-like aircraft with charging stations aboard -- probably solar-powered so you're not burning extra fuel to recharge people's batteries -- could change a lot of people's minds. After all, if they can simply drive their cars aboard the aircraft and drive them off at their destination, why bother with standard passenger planes?
@stephenmabry28663 жыл бұрын
@@johndemeritt3460 kzbin.info/www/bejne/rKO5n5hparGIb7c Now you know.
@fredbecker6073 жыл бұрын
If done right, they could do away with the tail surfaces. Make it more like a canard configuration.
@carlost.92333 жыл бұрын
Super informative! Thank you for making this!
@philliphunt97943 жыл бұрын
Airships have been attractive repeatedly in aviation history. They sound like a good idea, but they have some built in disadvantages, most notably their susceptibility to adverse weather at lower altitudes, and their low speed. Will be interesting to see if this idea bears meaningful fruit in the future.
@500features3 жыл бұрын
15:10 - the saddest part of every of his videos 😞
@andrewashmore80002 ай бұрын
Excellent video , thanks for making , some indepth info.
@DavidElzeitsinfill3 жыл бұрын
Love your videos. Always get a lot of good information and so many good ideas.
@ElectricAviation3 жыл бұрын
Glad you like them!
@ricardoimai966 Жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation, thanks for sharing
@ElectricAviation Жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@williambunting8032 жыл бұрын
Excellent production. Thank you.
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@simonbrooks60732 жыл бұрын
Great video full of interesting facts.
@skydemon2263 жыл бұрын
I wonder weather a delta wing configuration would be more efficient, as an increase the surface area and a reduction in wing loading, therefore reducing the structural mass, reduce in drag at higher speeds. I very much enjoyed you presentation.
@RuslanDorfman3 жыл бұрын
@electricaviation Thank you for wonderful and informative content. I wonder how flying at low altitude (see "ekranoplane") can improve the range of electric flying boats
@RichardRParsons3 жыл бұрын
Great video. You may also be interested in covering Zephyr by Airbus in future videos on this topic. They seem to be doing interesting work in this area.
@ElectricAviation3 жыл бұрын
I met the people who were involved in the Zephyr project about 4 years ago. They had just completed the Zephyr2 flight and achieved a record. I wanted to mention it in this video, but it was too long as it is. You are right though, it can be a future topic
@jdm11053 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your videos. Two points: One, the use of hybrid batteries and Ultra Capacitors. Two: charging systems, solar is good, but slow. Add into the mix a Q2 pulse motor generator from Quata Magnetics (based on Nikola Tesla U.S. Patent 685,957 and U.S. Patent 685958) - Apparatus for the Utilization of Radiant Energy, and the patent # GB191417811, 1915-05-13, BENITEZ CARLOS F (MX), System for the Generation of Electric Currents (using modern electronics). With all the above you could charge a Tesla Battery Pack, Theoretically under one hour. By splitting the pack as Carlos Benitez suggest, you charge Pack A while utilizing Pack B. And vise versa.
@jonathanmillner3 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one waiting for someone to merge solar with a hybrid wing aircraft so you have A. Very efficient flying matched with B. A huge amount of plane surface area to put solar panels on?
@thomasburnett47123 жыл бұрын
Excellent informative video!
@Doctorbasss3 жыл бұрын
Your video are VERY well made and explained and informative. It would be also interesting to push the possibility to the absolute max, just like evaluating what we think today to be the impossible: ( a motor 100% efficient instead of 96-97%), solar cells 100% efficient instead of 30% etc... then we would know the true absolute boundary an electric aircraft can be in real time power ( no range batteries, just peak shaping batteries)
@GuyBrushThriftnood2 жыл бұрын
What a nice guy! Informative and interesting
@HobbesNJoe2 жыл бұрын
Amazing, well-researched video! Thanks for adding some numbers to potential solutions for short flight times. I love the idea of a tandem wing glider with solar, as in the thumbnail. I'm sad that there wasn't anything in the video about tandem wing gliders, except in closing.
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
My pleasure! Here is the article about the tandem wing aircraft. sustainableskies.org/a-solar-algae-hybrid-for-an-atlantic-crossing/ Not much has happened in the development of that aircraft
@licencetoswill3 жыл бұрын
great story, keep them coming.
@ElectricAviation3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, will do!
@someguydino67703 жыл бұрын
Yes you mentioned the Sunseeker Duo created by Eric Scott Raymond in 2009. However; when you recounted the history of solar powered airplanes; you REALLY "fumbled the ball" by failing to mention the Sunseeker 1 which Mr. Raymond flew across the entire United States in 1990!
@kocsisjanos8503 жыл бұрын
The great advantage is flying in "reverse" facing headwind (let alone quartering headwinds!)...🤣⚡☔🌦
@dandaniels8512 жыл бұрын
Yes, very impressive but, WHERE WAS THE PLANE YOU USED IN YOUR TITLE THUMBNAIL??? all that intelligence disgraced with one deceptive move. Don't do it again...
@crackedemerald49303 жыл бұрын
Finally, now i have the tools to race the sun.
@yougeo2 жыл бұрын
By the way when searching for solar panels on Amazon where they often overestimate the power output of the panels the best way to get a true estimate of the power is to use some Factor like 20% and multiply it times 1, 000 watts per square meter times the physical size of the cell which is usually specified in the description of the solar system. That will be the closer number to the true output of the solar panel on Amazon and you'll find they usually quote double that.
@El.Duder-ino2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making this video👍
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
My pleasure 😊
@sokolmihajlovic13912 жыл бұрын
Ty bro for your remarkable work.
@samueltucker84733 жыл бұрын
Great presentation, very encouraging.
@KWITS3 жыл бұрын
Always like your videos but this one made me react: I’m not aviator nor engineer. But I am a ‘creative mind’ and made a solar air plain design a year ago. Some say it’s an interesting design others say it’s impossible to make it fly. It would be nice to get in contact with some people who could actually think along and (if possible!) develop it to something that could work. Thanks again for the videos and keep up the good work!
@GudieveNing3 жыл бұрын
My company has been on the case for a long (long!) time. We have designed a large (part) passenger carrying solar powered semi-ornithopter whose wings are covered in next generation solar panels to top up the batteries in flight and charge them when landed. That is all I can say for now, but follow @YAIRENERGY and we'll Tweet once we have something tangible to show. We're in stealth, so there won't be much news until everything works to our standards.
@DavidElzeitsinfill3 жыл бұрын
I'm a "creative mind" also. actually studied architectural engineering but I'm very interested in electric vehicle design. If you would just like to get some feed back on your design you can email me at dvdelze@gmail.com
@kevinh89363 жыл бұрын
another great video! thanks!
@ElectricAviation3 жыл бұрын
My pleasure!
@JohnA0002 жыл бұрын
What a great idea, so glad that green energy is so efficient. So nobody flies at night. Just brilliant.😵
@danielnofal3 жыл бұрын
Excellent content. The formulas are very valuable
@brentwalker85965 ай бұрын
Improved battery and solar cell technology can improve overall performance of these aircraft.
@TheWinezen2 ай бұрын
Perhaps the next version would be able to incorporate more solar cells along the fuselage sides of the plane so that the plane can produce power from rising and setting sun periods. Every square foot counts. Also, if the engine can be mounted in the rear, it would reduce the turbulence going through the entire body of the plane and increase laminar flow which will contribute to better lift and efficient power usage. You just have to use taller landing gears that will let you tilt for take-off and land more safely without damaging the rotors.
@martshearer4983 жыл бұрын
Don't forget pioneering unmanned aircraft like AC Propulsion's So Long.
@TontNZ3 жыл бұрын
Please, please do something about the poor audio quality. Sounds like the microphone is meters away from you. Thanks!
@bromnader51963 жыл бұрын
Yes, I had to turn on the captions.
@gobl-analienabductedbyhuma53873 жыл бұрын
Better alternative: Put the PV cells under the wing, install lasers at the Tesla Superchargers, pointing up and tracking the airplanes! So the electric jet would have enough power available for a high speed travel! Thats the concept for the future for long distance high speed electric jets. Not kidding. My patent :)
@otterylexa44993 жыл бұрын
There was a recent announcement from a Swedish team about structural batteries (basically turning carbon fibre composites into battery cells as far as I understood it) recently.
@philv39413 жыл бұрын
Only few kWh by kg of structure. A 300kg structure gives about 20 kWh of battery. I doubt on the interest.
@KonichiWawa3 жыл бұрын
I wonder about the possibility of a small satellite being launched from one of these vehicles. If possible when might we see something like this happen? I mean the advertising alone should insure available funds to accomplish the task.
@prednosttrake3 жыл бұрын
Cartel should definitely look into autonomous solutions with Sunseeker. Perhaps add a fuel cell to be able to fly at night.
@scottwatschke41923 жыл бұрын
Well done very interesting.
@woodarddarren3 жыл бұрын
thanks for your research
@ElectricAviation3 жыл бұрын
My pleasure
@jimhofoss99822 жыл бұрын
3 main factors for future electric planes… lighter, stronger materials. More efficient solar cells. And higher energy density batteries. It’s slowly getting there.
@angelarch53523 жыл бұрын
What about a powered blimp or zeppelin? fill it with helium, and there is a tremendous amount of area for solar cells.
@Alrukitaf3 жыл бұрын
Excellent vid.
@bennithomas8414 Жыл бұрын
Which is the best available solar powered a/c to fly around the world ?
@tobuslieven3 жыл бұрын
2:06 What are the paper thin solar panels they're using here? I haven't been able to buy thin film panels whenever I've looked for them. Anyone know of a source?
@ElectricAviation3 жыл бұрын
You can buy them from AliBaba website, with flexible substrate
@captarmour3 жыл бұрын
Close coupled canards are said to be more efficient than canards far ahead of the wing due to mutually beneficial interaction. Does a close coupled Tandem also benefit from mutually beneficial interaction? Once I built a close coupled delta canard with the trailing edge of the canard root directly above the leading edge of the wing root with a 55 degree sweep. the vertical spacing was twice wing thickness. when i tried lowering the canard to 1/4 of wing thickness above the wing, resulting in a very narrow gap between canard and wing, it became very difficult to turn. at the time I thought it was probably due to stronger leading edge vortices on the leading edge of the wing. any thoughts on this?
@generalinformation21598 ай бұрын
At 12:45 it would be good to clarify that your calculation assumes that induced drag coefficient is constant across all speeds.
@Make_Boxing_Great_Again3 жыл бұрын
If you have an IRF rating you can just climb above the clouds when the sun shines almost all the time during the day.
@dandil3 жыл бұрын
"somehow the idea never caught on"....uh yeah, at 1kw/m^2 even with 100% efficient solar panels you're probably never going to be able to carry people at speeds in excess of maybe 100mph. this is basically a consequence of the skin drag of the aircraft.
@solarfunction18472 жыл бұрын
They need to design a solar plane that has Multijunction (MJ) Solar Panels on the wings so that they can generate the maximum amount of power of between 40-50%, they are the same solar panels now being used on satellites & spacecrafts.
@michaelchan38863 жыл бұрын
A flying wing would be a better design to reduce drag and size of aircraft.
@somebody35243 жыл бұрын
Maybe a flying wing with its almost always greater wing area would be better suited for solar powered flight.
@TacTechMic3 жыл бұрын
Also, at higher altitude, air is thinner, thus requiring less energy to overcome it; as well as being closer to the sun, as you said. peace
@comptegoogle5113 жыл бұрын
Outside from wanting to increase the Reynolds number of the wing, I'm wondering why they don't put the propellers in pusher mode. Personally, I would put a bunch of small permanent magnet engines that can fit in the max cord thickness with small props in the downwash of the wing.
@gianc.25593 жыл бұрын
If there is more than enough energy to be used on this planet is Sun and Water combined that translate it as steam . We have forgot the most simple combination we should re-look at from steam trains of the past .
@ToysRUsKid_Critter3 жыл бұрын
Solar Stratos is not pure solar, but rather solar augmented . A hybrid. It is also vapor ware since it has not flown and set any benchmark.
@Eugensdiet3 жыл бұрын
Great for engineering studies. Waste of time when it comes to moving people from A to B.
@mjk80193 жыл бұрын
People, maybe. But not cargo.
@johnsmith46303 жыл бұрын
84 mph as the crow flies ain’t too bad
@anthonynorton6663 жыл бұрын
When flying at altitudes that require oxygen supplemental oxygen for the pilot, what do you use to minimize the increase in payload?
@qorje3 жыл бұрын
If you fly higher you need less power due to lower air density. Would that help with solar powered airplanes? At what height is it noticable?
@xevious25013 жыл бұрын
The only problem with such Solar only aircraft, is that their build is so light weight that such a thing would be impossible for any conventional aircraft which would already be built to be structurally sound as possible to cope with its required weight goals. and yet be strong enought for mainstream daily use. The key to solar is doubling if not tripling the amount of electricity that can be developed from sunlight, and it is possible that far far more can be. Consider the earth is powered much by the sun. Everything is attributed to solar power in one way or another.
@markcampbell75773 жыл бұрын
When will you use the Edison generator as the power source for electric power planes. One car generator chisel to spin with permanent magnet motor and inverters added will produce 13 kw of power at 110v AC
@jakobhuss3 жыл бұрын
I would be very interested in a video about altitude and aerodynamic efficiency. Could electric aircraft work better on extremely high altitudes?
@guieggert45923 жыл бұрын
Theoretically yes. But because the atmosphere is so thin extremely high it's hard to get the lift. You need to either fly supersonic, or have gigantic wings. Obviously engineering an electric plane to fly at supersonic speeds at high altitudes or having gigantic wings is an extremely difficult task.
@simonm14473 жыл бұрын
@@guieggert4592 This is what solarstatos plans, they build a sort of electric U-2 with a large wing span, capable of flying at high altitudes. It's not a pure solar electric aircraft, the solar cells are more used as a range extender.
@tobiasreichelt8882 жыл бұрын
I think the configurations we will see are first canard vtols with altitude capabilites of 50'000 ft and then a lifting-body flying up to 90'000 ft. Solar between 1.5 - 4 kWp for a 1 - 2 seater & 430 Wh/kg pack level batteries at 60 - 80 % of 700 kg gross weight. 400 - 500 kt cruise 10 hrs (unlimited 250 kt daytime).
@tobiasreichelt8882 жыл бұрын
Climb rates better than 10.000 ft/min if wanted
@vickvickson42733 жыл бұрын
Why not making a MUCH bigger solar cells area, by putting a single triangle (v) shaped wing, like trikes have?