Destroyer losses in World War II

This video shows countries that lost destroyers in World War II.

[@AI-cp1jg]

My my what big guns these destroyers have.

[@josephgallacher3729]

Yeah, poor graphics

[@LosterwellNongpluh-vu6cg]

Yeah.. for 5 inchers... can't imagine how big the 18 inch guns would be progected or drawn

[@josephromance3908]

Those models look more like battleships than destroyers.

[@Stripedbottom]

All of the Swedish destroyers were lost in one go, in an accidental explosion while they were tied up to each other. They did not see actual action as Sweden was not a combatant in WW2. Only one of them was permanently lost however, the other two were raised and repaired.

[@tigerland4328]

UK 🇬🇧 & Japan 🇯🇵 the naval equivalents of Germany and the USSR on land

[@Alex-se3dl]

USA and Japan may be?

[@tigerland4328]

@@Alex-se3dl well no as the UK lost more ships than the USA

[@TorrentUK]

@@tigerland4328 Because it was in the war for two years longer than the US and at one point was the only navy facing the might of the German and Italian navies.

[@tigerland4328]

@@TorrentUK true. The defeat of both the kriegsmarine and the Reggia marina was by and large the doing of the Royal navy.

[@sartanawillpay7977]

The Canadian flag is anachronistic. The maple leaf flag was not designed or adopted before the mid 1960s. Canada used a Canadian version of the Red Ensign during the war.

[@tazman572]

1965 to be exact.

[@tarechan009]

🇯🇵 is too

[@gregwilliams386]

Canada, wrong flag. All the ships are not destroyers. Destroyers were never that large or have triple turrets.

[@raimunddoppler7273]

Wright

[@Pilum1000]

it's look like not destroyers, but cruisers or battleships...

[@paultaylor9498]

It's just a video not exact ffs

[@lewissparrow7417]

Two things to mention;1) Japan built alot of large "fleet destroyers" that were formidable surface opponents and in the Long Lance torpedo had one of the best anti-ship weapons but their destroyers had 2 flaws- they were unbelievably vulnerable to air and submarine attack (just Google the submarine USS Harder to see what I mean!). 2) The Soviets lost 34 destroyers but quite a few of them were to air attack when they had no air cover whatsoever and even then they only sank after taking a real pasting.

[@vlost7508]

На эсминцах второй мировой башен с тремя орудиями не было. Мелочь но не приятно.

[@pac1fic055]

Ironically, the Japanese destroyer Kamikaze survived the war.

[@pac1fic055]

@@user-gc1lt8dl3j 雪風と神風の駆逐艦は戦争が生き残った。

[@-Shinonome]

⁠@@user-gc1lt8dl3j神風も生き残ってますよ

[@user-fh4bn5df5n]

澤風、汐風、夕風、神風、朝顔、響、初霜、雪風 凉月、冬月、花月、春月、宵月、夏月 竹、槇、桐、杉、樫、榧、楓、楢、椿、欅、柳、楡、蔦、萩、柿、椎 菫、楠、雄竹、初桜、樺、初梅 とりまこんだけだっけ？

[@ussr8184]

@@user-fh4bn5df5n そうですね

[@Lifeisalwaysarace]

I AM IN ADDICTION WITH YOUR CHANNEL!

[@nekota5967]

The names of Japanese destroyers are all poetic and beautiful, but many of the names don't come across unless you know Japanese. YUDACHI” is a (sudden) evening shower (rain) in English. Names that are easy to translate SUZUTUKI is used in haiku, but is more difficult to translate than YUDACHI.

[@user-lx9tf1hc4c]

Shimakaze, akizuki, ayanami or hayanami

[@nekota5967]

@@user-lx9tf1hc4c Chandra Bose, Chief Advocate, Indian National Army Tribunal, Delhi The victory of the Japanese army impressed the Indians in Asia and enabled them to participate in the fight for their country, and enabled them to participate in the fight for their country. Kukrit Pramode, former Prime Minister of Thailand Thanks to Japan, all Asian countries became independent. The mother, Japan, She had a difficult childbirth, which damaged her mother's body, but her child was born. But her child is growing up well. but her child is growing up well. Today, the peoples of Southeast Asia can talk with the U.S. and Britain as equals, Who is the reason why the people of Southeast Asia are able to talk with the U.S. and Britain on equal terms today? It is because of their mother, Japan, who killed her own life for the sake of humanity. December 8, The mother who showed us this serious thought, who showed us this serious thought, made a serious decision with her whole life. And on August 15, August 15 is the day when our dear mother who showed us this serious thought, made a serious decision with all her strength. We must not forget these two days. Ben Bruce Blakney, Tokyo Trial Lawyer, U.S.A. The Allied Powers, who used the atomic bomb, a cruel weapon prohibited by international law, to kill many civilians, were the first to use the atomic bomb in the war. The Allies killed many civilians by using the atomic bomb, a brutal weapon prohibited by international law, Regarding the mistreatment of prisoners of war, Japan's responsibility for the abuse of POWs?

[@kentayasuda4523]

日本の駆逐艦の名前は、海洋気象現象。 軽巡洋艦は河川名。重巡洋艦は山の名前。

[@renown16]

the Australian navy lost more than two, we lost, vampire, voyager, waterhen and nizam

[@user-ov5cw4jk1e]

Interesting and informative video. Any videos i can see on other warship types loses in World War 2? Like battleships, carriers, heavy and light cruisers, subs? Thanks😊

[@Grandizer8989]

My new favorite channel

[@tazman572]

I'd rethink that thought. Many numbers are false.

[@lalit429]

Wow greatest creators !!!! Amazing! !!

[@rascalhusky8129]

Interesting as usual. The visual presentation of your videos are stunning. Good job 👏.

[@tazman572]

The graphics are terrible. Nowhere close to the real thing.

[@chriscollis9315]

Numbers seem not correct?

[@ALLAH-AZZAWAJAL]

Who's like peace😊

[@markpayne2057]

The problem to my mind is that the figures are just the number of destroyers lost, and not the percentage of destroyers that each nation started with, and the percentage of destroyers lost in comparison to the number built during the war. So while the British and Japanese have very high figures for destroyers lost, it doesn’t take into account what percentage this was. So a smaller nation like Greece could lose virtually all of its destroyers, and not build any replacements, whereas Britain could and did lose a large number, but still end up with more destroyers in its service by the close of the war.

[@tazman572]

Canada lost 24 destroyers in WW2, not 8. The 8 mentioned were lost due to collisions or other accidents, but NOT German U-Boats.

[@user-cr8dl8io5b]

Потери эсминцев, а на картинке целые крейсера какие-то.

[@rrkasportreal]

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@user-hj2mn7bp3d]

ほとんどアメリカだろうが耐え難きを耐え任務を遂行し散華された先祖に敬礼！

[@okanolin70]

ridiculous Germany only had 44 destroyers in the whole of WW2, so I really wonder where 9 unbuilt ships are supposed to come from

[@alganhar1]

Germany had several classes of large 'Torpedo Boat' which displaced as much, and would have been classified as small to medium sized destroyers in many other navies. Many of the extras likely comes from those ships in part. Another is the foreign ships that the Germans captured and pressed into service, which included several destroyers, though most were smaller vessels such as minesweepers and littoral patrol boats.

[@waynesworldofsci-tech]

For anyone interested, HMCS Haida is a museum ship in Hamilton Canada. She is the last surviving Tribal class destroyer.

[@Kriptomaniya903]

🚢🧨🔥

[@glenchapman3899]

I think some of your numbers are pretty suspect. For example you show Germany loosing 53 destroyers in the war. They only ever had 37 total. Australia lost 4 destroyers yet you showed only 2

[@carloschristanio4709]

That is ehat I was thinking

[@carloschristanio4709]

Z 52 was paper ship unless they are counting destoryer like ships as well?

[@carloschristanio4709]

Wikipedia says 22 but probably not counting the forgien ones

[@alganhar1]

Part of the misunderstanding is it very much looks like the larger German Torpedo Boats are included, which is not as stupid as it sounds. The larger German Torpedo Boats were as big as small destroyers in other navies, and in most navies would have been classified as Destroyers despite their relatively poor gun armament.

[@glenchapman3899]

@@alganhar1 Yes I think you might be right. If you also include the Italian torpedo boats they confiscated after Italy left the war you do get pretty close to the number they claim.

[@user-xi8qs1cd6u]

что то цифры явно завышены.у Германии не было 53 эсминцев вообще

[@bartoszguszczak8694]

Wait a second. Poland lost 4 destroyers. ORP Wicher. ORP Grom, ORP Orkan, ORP Kujawiak.

[@SKLxFACTOR]

Bro plz Tell your channel monetize ❓

[@kowalski6928]

He will never say

[@zach2382]

Do you see any advertisements if not then it is not monetized and why do care so much

[@Muhammad.88]

Дуюм коммент 🇹🇯 🙋‍♂️

[@alexivanov417]

It was necessary to show the losses as a percentage of the total.

[@xiphoid2011]

all understanding, including columbia (which joined on the allied side), except how the heck did Sweden lose 3 destroyers without fighting anyone?

[@explicitcontent68]

All these are just somewhere under

[@teddystauffer4614]

Tolle Sache

[@masasimada4585]

アメリカが意外と少ないのとイタリアは意外と多いね😲

[@whitewolf-xf9ui]

As a Canadian I know of three destroyers off the top of my head the Ottawa the Saint Croix and the athabascan (--- doubt I spelled this right What are the other ones anyone know?

[@gksj2info]

Wow

[@Animitoria]

2nd

[@allandapenhacosta8053]

Total: 648 Destroyers

[@geoffburrill9850]

I think that they have classed any surface ship as a destroyer. The R.N. at the start of w.w.2 was the biggest navy in the world and could absorb the losses whereas Japan could not.

[@nekota5967]

April 19, 1951. At a joint session of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, Army General Douglas MacArthur, who occupied and ruled Japan as Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers (SCAP), concluded his half-hour farewell address by saying. You have to understand that Japan had a population of nearly 80 million on four small islands. 'Japan's labor force is potentially the best in terms of both quantity and quality. They built factories, they had labor, but they did not have raw materials. They had no cotton, no wool, no oil production, no tin, no rubber, and nothing else. All of that existed in the waters of Asia." If the raw material supply were cut off, there would be 10 to 12 million people unemployed in Japan. That is what they feared. Thus, the motivation that drove Japan to war was largely driven by security needs. The audience was stunned. If the testimony is correct, Japan went to war not to invade, but to defend itself. Not only would this undermine the premise of the war as a just war that defeated the aggressor nation of Japan, but it would also make even the Tokyo Tribunal (International Military Tribunal for the Far East) lose its legitimacy. More to the point, it could even negate MacArthur's achievement of “democratization” and “demilitarization” during the five years and eight months of occupation and rule of Japan. This statement disappointed Republican expectations and provoked outrage. MacArthur's popularity quickly waned, and his presidential dreams were crushed.

[@alganhar1]

@@nekota5967 Kind of falls apart when you look at how the Japanese treated the populations of those places they invaded... Not very well is a gross understatement.....

[@nekota5967]

@@alganhar1 O. Lattimore, Advisor to the Republic of China What Japan has accomplished admirably is the complete destruction of the Western colonial empire. Japan's admirable achievement was the complete destruction of the Western colonial empire. Ms. H. Mears, sociologist, U.S.A. (in her book) The Tokyo Trials were not justice, but a clear lynching. How can we in the U.S. punish Japan? I don't understand. C. Willoughby, Chief of Staff, GHQ The Tokyo Tribunal is the worst hypocrisy in history. If the U.S. had been in the same position, we would have fought just like Japan. G. Shafieh, Foreign Minister of Malaysia Why is Japan apologizing? The Japanese, who were as small as Malaysians in that war, drove out the British, who were as big as Malaysians. Japanese, who were as small as Malaysians, drove out the British, who were as big as Malaysians, in that war. Without Japan, Southeast Asia would not have gained independence. To deny the precious sacrifices made by Japan is like looking only in the rearview mirror. is like looking only in the rearview mirror. Mahathir bin Mohamad, the fourth Prime Minister of Malaysia If the Japanese are to be held responsible for the war, it must be before that, If we hold the Japanese responsible for the war, what about the responsibility of the Western suzerain states that continued their inhuman domination and deprivation earlier? The arrival of Japan freed Japan from colonial rule and brought about modernization." Boon Tomo, former Minister of Information of Indonesia That war was our war. We had to do it. But Japan was forced to bear the entire burden of the war, and it drove Japan to the brink of destruction. We drove Japan to the brink of destruction. I am sorry. M. Hatta (father of independence alongside Sukarno) Indonesia, a treasure trove of natural resources, was a colony that the Netherlands, a weary suzerain state, could not let go of. Indonesia was a colony that the beleaguered Dutch suzerainty could not let go of. (Omitted) ...and then became independent. （The Dutch demanded a large amount of debt from Indonesia in revenge for its independence. Japan took over this debt in the form of wartime compensation.

[@nekota5967]

@@alganhar1 Chandra Bose, Chief Advocate, Indian National Army Tribunal, Delhi The victory of the Japanese army impressed the Indians in Asia and enabled them to participate in the fight for their country, and enabled them to participate in the fight for their country. Kukrit Pramode, former Prime Minister of Thailand Thanks to Japan, all Asian countries became independent. The mother, Japan, She had a difficult childbirth, which damaged her mother's body, but her child was born. But her child is growing up well. but her child is growing up well. Today, the peoples of Southeast Asia can talk with the U.S. and Britain as equals, Who is the reason why the people of Southeast Asia are able to talk with the U.S. and Britain on equal terms today? It is because of their mother, Japan, who killed her own life for the sake of humanity. December 8, The mother who showed us this serious thought, who showed us this serious thought, made a serious decision with her whole life. And on August 15, August 15 is the day when our dear mother who showed us this serious thought, made a serious decision with all her strength. We must not forget these two days. Ben Bruce Blakney, Tokyo Trial Lawyer, U.S.A. The Allied Powers, who used the atomic bomb, a cruel weapon prohibited by international law, to kill many civilians, were the first to use the atomic bomb in the war. The Allies killed many civilians by using the atomic bomb, a brutal weapon prohibited by international law, Regarding the mistreatment of prisoners of war, Japan's responsibility for the abuse of POWs?

[@nekota5967]

@@alganhar1 Grabai Desai, President, Bar Council of India India will soon become independent. It was Japan that gave us the opportunity to become independent. Thanks to Japan, India's independence was hastened by 30 years. We should not forget this debt of gratitude. This is not only true of India. The same is true for Indonesia, Vietnam, and all the peoples of East Asia. The people of India must remember this deeply in their hearts and minds. We will cooperate generously with Japan's reconstruction.

[@user-fh4bn5df5n]

駆逐艦、、、、、、？？？？

[@maxryabokon1515]

Destroyers with battleship gun turrets:)

[@yamatomushashi5583]

It's more of an illustration.

[@mikel6502]

Germany has no destroyer now

[@yamatomushashi5583]

Sweden lost three destroyers? I thought the Swedes were neutral like Switzerland at that time.

[@petergray2712]

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A5rsfj%C3%A4rden_disaster#:~:text=Three%20Swedish%20Navy%20destroyers%20were,blow%20to%20the%20Swedish%20Navy.

[@DavidRichards-mh9rg]

The French Navy weren’t even in the war were they?

[@niclasjohansson4333]

Wake up!

[@DavidRichards-mh9rg]

The French navy didn’t do much up until the French surrender in June 1940, then they were target practice for the Royal Navy in North Africa when they refused to join the war against Hitler. They then scuttled themselves when the Nazis invaded Collaborationist Vichy France so what did the French navy do in the war except make bottom features on the sea bed?

[@Koujuwest]

広大な植民地を守る為に英国は膨大な艦船を必要としたから上位 日本は総力戦でほぼ喪失の違い

[@marcojustino4400]

Gostaria de saber como a Colômbia perdeu um contratorpedeiro na Segunda Guerra Mundial.

[@ihninoc]

Consulta acá msmo en youtube, hay unjos videos que muestran lo de Cololmbia en la segunda gerra mundial, incluso alncanzaron a dejar en mal estado un submarino nazi.

[@wongyc5585]

Italy lose more than the US Navy despite fighting on one front.

[@MedallionYT]

How did Japan even have that many destroyers?!

[@Grandizer8989]

The DDs were the backbone of the Imperial Fleet. Later in the war, they were more troop/supply transports than fighting ships

[@Patrick_Cooper]

You couldn't find real Destroyers for your video. The ships you use as a model are at least a light cruiser. Do better please I really like your stuff.

[@user-sm9xu3nq6v]

日本はソロモンでネズミ輸送のために酷使されましたから.....。あまりの損失の多さにその後の作戦に支障が出るレベルでしたし。そこで松型駆逐艦をとなったわけですが

[@user-qj8vf4kg3z]

А где данные по СССР?

[@KOT_HA_TAHKE]

01:55

[@user-os6je6rv1u]

영국 일본이 섬나라라서 배를 많이 써서 이런건가

[@tigerland4328]

Yes and both were under naval blockade during ww2.

[@Chris.M]

Pocket battleships? 😂

[@francistorchio]

How did Sweden lose three destroyers since Sweden was neutral in the war?

[@Escapee5931]

Mines?

[@HemlockRidge]

WTF are these ships being shown? They're NOT Destroyers. Just awful graphics, they look like an acid dream. Perhaps the developer should have looked at a picture of a WWII Destroyer.

[@CorredoYAlexander]

XD colombia q paso ?

[@7zmey7]

у Италии все выпущенные корабли потонули чтоли?

[@user-ci4xs8sm8n]

Италия во второй мировой войне , была довольно слаба 🙄 даже Греция ей надрала зад и при этом армия Италии имела численное преимущество над Грецией . В отличие от Японии каторая была слаба сухопутной армией она имела на тот момент один из сильнейших флотов мира . А Италия таки на суше таки воде были никудышны . Вот и их топили так легко .

[@tigerland4328]

​​@@user-ci4xs8sm8nthe Italian navy was the best of its three services. It's torpedo boats and naval special forces were particularly capable. They were not useless.

[@tigerland4328]

Almost all of Italy's destroyers were sunk by the British.

[@mirkotorca1950]

Germany had very few but some like Bismarck were ahead of its time.

[@TheLiamster]

They also had the Tirpitz which was sunk. They are battleships not destroyers though

[@manwithbat]

Bismarck is a battleship

[@Grandizer8989]

Hitler never understood the value of the Navy (Kriegsmarine). If I were him, I would’ve built more subs and captured the French Fleet in 1940 and turn the Med into his personal swimming pool. That way, Africa would’ve been his.

[@ATownDown32]

Bismarck was a dogshit Battleship for its time. Outdated scheme , overweight , no deck armor couldn't turn and maintain speed. Waste of steel held up by wehraboo propaganda.

[@tigerland4328]

​@@ATownDown32I agree

[@user-eb6so3zv9t]

16inch gun!!!!!

[@user-dw9zc9iy2m]

Абсолютне цифры, сами по себе - это не очень интересно, на много информативное, и интереснее отношение общего количества вонвавших к потопленым!

[@ahtong1014]

Destroyer with CLs gun

[@user-pe6wj5ud2m]

Артиллерийские башни на эсминцах конечно мощнецкие. )))

[@750suzuki7]

Sweden was not a combatant in WWII, Sweden was neutral. You show Sweden with the loss of three destroyers....??

[@davidkinsey8657]

The Swedish destroyers lost were the Goteborg, Klas Horn and Klas Uggla. On September 17,1941 an explosion of unknown origins on the Goteborg killed 33 sailors and sank all three ships. Look up the Hjarsfarden disaster for more information.

[@user-my7kq9pj3l]

駆逐艦…？ というか日本が一番多いのは意外だったな…

[@arwaniahmad9280]

Japan fight alone

[@MrMensajero]

A reino unido los dejaron en lanchas

[@user-bq1km5fd2c]

Интересно и кто же у "нейтральной" Швеции три эсминца утопил?

[@PradeepKumar-mc8zi]

1st

[@user-lj1ck7wn7b]

Should say British Empire not United Kingdom as they include Canadian, Australian losses etc

[@tangoonrollers]

Australia lost 3 destroyers in WW2

[@HegyCsill]

Question: Who sank the 57 french and 13 dutch destroyers??? Hahaha!!!! The "allied" UK!!! Where? In Mers-el Kebir, Morocco!!! Hihihi...

[@user-ds6fd2gk1p]

Операция Катапульта, Англичане отличные союзники!

[@frednone]

I'm left in awe by your grasp of history.

[@andrewstewart9263]

Yeah, because they were under Vichy French control who were Nazi collaborators & the British didn't want those ships being used by Germany, so they simply had to go as the Vichy French govt refused to surrender them to the Royal Navy.

[@alganhar1]

1) There were no Dutch Destroyers in Mers-el Kebir. All Dutch ships that had not joined Free Dutch forces were stationed in the Dutch East Indies where most were lost in action against the Japanese in 1942. 2) The French did not lose 57 destroyers at Mers-el Kebir. The losses there are well documented. So do try not to lie.