Developing Film with Clorox Bleach

[@linusandhiscamera]

00:56 for clarity the method we’re doing in the video is the method of bleaching they figured out how to do with tons of trial and error. original method was taking the film to some glass and pouring bleach on it

[@jacksonwazny]

Soo cool 😮

[@ilaion11]

Man, the negatives look so much better than the positive! Cool stuff!

[@hedineijenhuis]

Fun fact, if you're fast enough, you can press the negative side of the film onto paper and it'll make an impression there, it looks absolutely sick - would recommend thick high quality paper.

[@hellothisiskyle]

Depends on the film stock, this works best with 689, fp-100c will also work but you have to peel the film early resulting in an underdeveloped print. Best way to get the negative to transfer is to use a glossy paper like photo printing paper because it creates a vacuum so you don’t get any parts that pull off which is typical with more porous surfaces like watercolor paper.

[@CaptainPsychopath69]

Finally a film developer I can drink! Cheers

[@MatinsPhotography]

You make me fall in love with my own work when I watch your videos

[@URBONED]

Wow those negatives look incredible. The sharpness, the contrast, the saturation, and the grain, my god the grain! Stunning! Certainly makes the cost of peel apart more enticing when you have the potential for two different images.

[@theonlinelime1992]

That’s an interesting way of removing the black part! Basically doing two at once. I always worry I’ll get a bit of the bleach on the image however, so I’d tape it down onto a plane of glass and use a fine toothbrush for the black removal (with bleach of course).

[@Loveoverfear92]

Bro coulda gatekept this process but he shared it - Linus is amazing ❤

[@nicholaswoltersdorf5792]

this process is very commonly known by anyone shooting fp-100c. It was even advertised as a feature by Fujifilm when they were still producing it.

[@nikomenicou7304]

Great work Linus my favorite film KZbinr

[@justo_photography]

This was amazing! Seeing the chemistry work and the final results. If I ever shoot peel apart film definitely something I’d do.

[@filmstockreel]

Never knew this was a thing. Now I'm going to have to track down some of my peel apart negatives

[@flicksbymarlon]

Dope video. Never shot peel apart film before but I'll definitely try this when I get the chance.

[@karlwithab4813]

bro thos last ones are so sick

[@santinosartoris]

Those scans came back so sick. I would love for these peel-apart stocks to make a resurgence.

[@trentandjessie]

What a cool process! The final scans look incredible, especially the black and white. Thanks for another awesome video!

[@aheadachewithpictures]

love the one of JID, its cool to have both side by side

[@MTHMSEN]

Does anyone know if this would be able to work with normal polaroid film? Or is it limited to peel apart because of the structure of the peel apart film?

[@TheNegative]

Next video: developing film with Mountain Dew Baja Blast 🔥🔥

[@NoahBility]

Somewhat random question unrelated to the phootography: Did you use the Adobe AI audio clean up software on the voice recordings for the developing process? It's a tool I've used before, and I find that it helps significantly with spotty audio, but you can hear a little bit of artifacting sometimes I'm curious to know what your experience has been like with it

[@linusandhiscamera]

I did - the mics didn’t work and I only had camera body audio 😂 good catch! Amazing tool that i hope to have to use very infrequently

[@NoahBility]

@@linusandhiscamera Ahh, okay. I knew I wasn't tripping! It doesn't take much away from the overall experience at all. My ears just perked up when I heard it Back on topic, though This was an inspiring revisit of these photos, and a lesson in how to find deeper value in what most would consider "trash"

[@CineStillFilm]

still mind blown that this works 🤯

[@edwllcxn]

when cinestill packfilm?

[@Bertzcommodities]

I recently acquired some expired roll film from 1979 and have had decent results surprisingly I keep all the negatives and clean them up , wondering if the process would be the same ??

[@reeft]

superb results, dude! way better and worth the trouble.

[@gatblau1]

I miss this film. I did this about 13 years ago and still have the negatives somewhere.

[@george_edward_]

I saw the title and was immediate like…. Yeah I gotta see this

[@just_eirik]

Very cool!

[@MrBaskins2010]

dope shit dude

[@DinoJagger]

bruh... this is so sick. Now Im wondering just how many of us have thrown away the peels LOL

[@m1llzzzz]

craziest grain in the game

[@NANCEmusic]

sooooo sick

[@Being_Joe]

I wonder what a drum scan would look like.

[@woodenhifi]

making art from 'trash' - beautiful

[@loganhathaway3957]

I just picked up a Polaroid peel apart film back for my Holga for $4 at a thrift store.

[@hellothisiskyle]

Right most of the backs are worth little to nothing now that the film is no longer in production, the *film* is the expensive part

[@mynameisnotcory]

Ummmmm can cinestill figure out how to recreate this film?! Can you imagine how much money theyd make 💰

[@rorycowieson5924]

Cinestill don’t make film. They just remove the remjet layer of Kodak Vision3 and repackage it.

[@mynameisnotcory]

@@rorycowieson5924 i mean they do that too, but i’m sure with enough help they could figure out fuji or kodak chemicals. Idk. I’m sure the cinestill guys are gere to back me up in the comments

[@hellothisiskyle]

@@rorycowieson5924or in the case of 400D get master rolls before they’re even coated in remjet apparently

[@NiGauBech7]

Someone has to recreate it first, so then they can just rebrand it

[@pg-l4469]

@@rorycowieson5924my understanding is that it isn't quite that simple, but yeah. I would certainly doubt they have anything close to the means necessary to make pack film from svratch

[@ishootfotoz]

Bring back peel apart cinestill!!!

[@shumyinghon]

very dangerous proposition

[@ZackiSnipes]

photography

[@JeremyCohen]

developing film with WHAT

[@DoubleLGeek]

this method is so cool looking, I don't understand why fujifilm doesn't give you a manual with the film.

[@hellothisiskyle]

Because this isn’t a feature of the film it’s a hack, they didn’t design it to do this people just figured out it was possible (like 15 years ago)

[@areallyrealisticguyd4333]

to think people hoard this film in literal boxes out of greed so it will never be released and the chemistry will slowly degrade until it no longer works. Just to make a quick buck

[@areallyrealisticguyd4333]

I personally wouldn't mind paying $50 a box which would put it closer to 4x5 film but $100 for 10 shots is absurd for expired film

[@hellothisiskyle]

Brooklyn film camera *cough* *cough*