Dialing in the OD/ID Dimensions on PUMA 2600SY II Lathe | DN Solutions

Advanced CNC Machining Technique - Travis shows you how to dial in the perfect ID/OD tolerance on the DN Solutions Puma 2600SY.
Purchase tooling seen in our videos and help Fund Free Education: TITANSofCNCTooling.com
FREE CNC Machining Academy:
rebrand.ly/TiAcademy
FREE Aerospace Academy:
rebrand.ly/TiAero
Subscribe for daily content and expert knowledge: rebrand.ly/SUBTITANS
___
___
FREE CNC Machining Academy. Join the Revolution:
rebrand.ly/TiAcademy
Follow us on Instagram:
rebrand.ly/TiINSTA
Like us on Facebook:
rebrand.ly/TiFACEBOOK
Join the conversation on our Facebook Group:
rebrand.ly/TiFBGroup
Connect with us on LinkedIn:
rebrand.ly/TiLINKEDIN
Follow our CEO, Titan Gilroy:
rebrand.ly/TitanGilroy
___
___
THANK YOU to our Partners who make this content possible:
Kennametal - rebrand.ly/TiKennametal
Doosan - bit.ly/DoosanTiYT
United Grinding - rebrand.ly/TiGrinding
Mastercam - rebrand.ly/MastercamEDUTiYT
Blaser Swisslube - rebrand.ly/TiBlaser
Tormach - rebrand.ly/TiTormach
Solidworks - rebrand.ly/TiSLDWRKS20
Trumpf - rebrand.ly/TiTRUMPF2022
Trumpf TruMark - rebrand.ly/TiTRUMPFTruMark
Trumpf TruPrint - rebrand.ly/TiTruPrint
Markforged - rebrand.ly/TITAN-Markforged
Tyrolit - rebrand.ly/TITAN-Tyrolit
Mitutoyo - rebrand.ly/TiMitutoyo
Haimer - rebrand.ly/TiHAIMER
LNS - rebrand.ly/TITAN-LNS
FANUC America - rebrand.ly/TiFanuc
Schunk - rebrand.ly/TiSchunk
#CNC #Machining #Machinist

[@roquri]

Amazing how machines have evolved to the accuracy they now can have.

[@MF175mp]

A good 1980s cnc can hit those tolerances still today if it's not worn out

[@LordOfChaos.x]

@@MF175mp sure if u do this setup to each part lmao Old machines dont have temperature compensation

[@MF175mp]

@@LordOfChaos.x true, wear compensation needs some attention too

[@MF175mp]

Actually if the old lathe is equipped with automatic tool setter stuff, this is not an issue and you can hit these tolerances anyway by measuring the tool from time to time by program. That was around at least in late 1980's in high end machines I believe.

[@LordOfChaos.x]

@@MF175mp those systems werent that reliable as they sound But sure u could hit tight tolerances But not on complex or exotic materials

[@somethingelse4424]

Two tenths tolerance and I'm losing sleep over my mic technique. The quality guy and I will probably argue about something, between the mic calibration and how much pressure we put on the knob. Even with the ratchet type mic handle you can change the reading by at least two tenths. And we have some dirty mics, which I'm sure changes the amount of torque the rachety clicky handle applies.

[@Stormin_Norman]

I would love to see more videos like this, describing the process you go through... Many thanks..

[@Awegner176]

Hey Titan, could you please do a full demo on how you guys offset tools on one of these lathes? I see a lot of discrepancies in how this is done in our industry. Thank you!

[@alejandromelo23ify]

You guys are impressive! Professionals at its finest!

[@bboydrummer1]

A very good video. Clear and concise. Thanks.

[@peterprapphan7067]

The best tutorial I've ever seen!! Thank you.

[@jimbob5b200]

Excellent video! If your cutting stinko inconnel remember it springs .04mm so..... If you wanted take off .02 you need write down your off set as travis has calculated it and that will sort out the next component 1st time , meanwhile you need to back off the finish tools .02mm to complete the current component. Or if your boss ain't on your back measure the 1st attempt spring pass the test cut dont measure it (hopefully have more than .04 excess material) and then add Travis' off set . With some Aircraft materials you need to appreciate the elasticity of the material and this makes a big difference between sizing in and Booom right 1st time ! Plus the offsets will alter over the course of the day due to spindle and material temp , size in every morning and after break and never trust the night shift 😉😉😉😉

[@williamlee7371]

The lathe I used had a similar push off. If I was 0.01mm undersize on ID I had to offset away by 0.02mm for my spring cut. But then for the next part I had to put 0.03mm offset back on. Also my advice is to SLOWLY input your offset. Trust me you don't want to accidentally take 0.1mm off when you only wanted 0.01mm but you pressed too quickly to notice.

[@jimbob5b200]

@@williamlee7371 absolutely we had mori seki nlx ergo line 250s and we had 1970s Binns Berries, all did the same it must be push off even on manuals , glad I'm not going mad 🤪

[@kw2519]

You sound like you know what you’re doing haha

[@ronnydowdy7432]

Travis this is a great video. Love watching your show and I really like the ID/OD measuring tools. Merry Christmas

[@travisjarrett2355]

Thanks Ronny. Appreciate that. Merry Christmas.

[@MaxCruise73]

When setting up for tight tolerances, I programmed equal depths of cut for my roughing passes. I wanted equal tool pressure on each roughing pass. I held a tight tolerance after the roughing passes, which enabled me to take two equal depths of cut with my finishing tool. It was all about working with even tool pressure on each pass.

[@kylemcgill2966]

I run 2 of these at my shop and once the machine warms up I can keep +/- .0002 throughout the day. No matter the material. I love these machines

[@Kyle-xt8ip]

I love how reliably tools move in these machines.

[@gar50172]

If you take care of them ya

[@wilmamcmeans7236]

everything you said is true but for close tolerance I would use a dial bore gage and a super mike set to gage blocks.

[@shaniegust1225]

Great video. Need more like these 👍 Keep up the great work.

[@jeffwombold9167]

Been doing that for years. Good teaching video!

[@StauterAdventureCo.]

Man I can’t wait to get a lathe..

[@enoz.j3506]

Great vid,Happy Christmas.

[@jylmachineshopvb]

Great explanation!

[@mxcollin95]

Great tip!

[@gabriellord3286]

I am no machinist, but going into aviation maintenance there will be a lot of cool parts I'll be putting in from amazing Machinists!

[@rallikas]

I just went from aircraft maintenance to machining. What part of maintenance you have in mind?

[@jgom4674]

Wow. Thanks Travis.

[@EZ_shop]

Great demo Travis. Love watching your videos. Ciao, Marco.

[@travisjarrett2355]

Thanks Marco.

[@davegill8634]

Quality Content Travis !👍

[@travisjarrett2355]

Thanks Dave. Appreciate the feedback.

[@derbacksteinbacker4942]

The fun part Beginns if you have multiple tight tolerances in a row that are each fairly long so the part is bending away from the tool ever so slightly with each pass so it gets kind of unpredictable how much it's actually gonna subtract. sometimes get parts with four fits directly behind each other with tolerances as tight as 0,009mm over a length of 100mm and when you got that dialed in you are just happy it's over.

[@travisjarrett2355]

Indeed. I have battled this myself and have thought about making a video on it actually. It can be a process for sure.

[@ytfan3815]

@Der Backsteinbäcker I assume you use multiple Wear Offsets for each fit on that part and you change your conical to parallel by program ??

[@derbacksteinbacker4942]

@YT Fan actually I don't use any wear offsets but a function of the controller . I program the machine to leave 0,05mm radial in the finishing pass. Then I measure the offsets of each of the fits from front to back, compensate for that in the conture until they are within one or two thousands of a millimeter. Then I calculate how far away I am from the desired diameter of each of the fits and bring all of them to for example 0,05mm above the final diameter, also in the conture( In doing this while constantly decreacing the amount of material the finishing pass leaves). When the fits are equal diamter from front to back and equally far from there final diameter I then finish the part without leaving any material. It's a pain in the ass every time and it's probably not the fastest method of doing this but I haven't scraped a single piece and I programmed these 3 times already. another thing that's annoying is you have to run the machine for about 20min or so until it's fully warmed up otherwise you will be working against a expanding machine and a hell of a part at the same time and that's really noting you want to do.

[@ytfan3815]

@@derbacksteinbacker4942 Ok, I assume you do low number of parts, or single parts. We do lots of shaft work up to 500 mm and I use a 0.5 mm ( in diameter ) leaving for finishing with a DCMT 0.4 rad. We have most of the time 4 fits on one side, and I use T0202 on first fit, T0213 (2nd), T0214 (3rd), T0215 (4th) and so on, when there is some conical in the fit I adjust that by program to get it parallel. I have a Warm-Up program that moves all axis for 10 min with a High Feed, works good for me, after that adjusting Wear Offset when necessary.

[@jeffwombold9167]

Sometimes you have to alter the program to fit the situation.

[@ashishpatel5294]

Very interesting info...

[@JSomerled]

Outstanding

[@scottleoncini9341]

Great video.

[@travisjarrett2355]

Thanks man!

[@curacurika]

Good job

[@crazycooterMN]

Definitely check that 2nd piece when the actual tool pressure and offsets are there.

[@miguelcastaneda7236]

True big diffearance especially if your burnishongh

[@Ric_1985]

Right on the money...

[@indrak.c673]

wow very nice video bro

[@willyharris4199]

I usually check the OD after my roughing pass so I can dial that in first, so that I know my finish pass is only taking my desired finish depth, I know it won’t damage my finishing tool too much then.

[@dipl_rodler5573]

i do that too. Some materials like carbon fibre are very sensitive and the roughing pass needs to be dialed in for tight tolerances.

[@willyharris4199]

@@dipl_rodler5573 honestly, I haven’t really machined many tough materials, probably the hardest is like high carbon steel in my shop time as an engineer, but I think the basics should follow through no matter what you machine 👍🏼

[@marcvaillancourtmv]

I agree also wheres the M01. M00 is unnecessary

[@dipl_rodler5573]

@@marcvaillancourtmv yes, u can just stop the program and then restart it, but i guess for an educational video it's good.

[@konsequence9752]

leaves a cleaner finish too, i never take more than .05 off with the finisher. i could do .1 by why bother. the roughers are handling it just fine. usually machine parts around 65 hrc. hardened carbon steel

[@seamuscasey1563]

I’ve never seen such a clean CNC machine I don’t know how you just manage too keep them so clean

[@mikhaildavydenko6841]

Constant cleaning is the key

[@runejakobsen9958]

@@mikhaildavydenko6841: Or running clean materials all the time.

[@loukola5353]

The machine is only a few months old.

[@mikhaildavydenko6841]

@@loukola5353 my younger machine is seven years old, for e.g. Three pallet APC DMG Mori NH4000 DCG. This is absolutely clean machine

[@ktgmobile2552]

Because they dont do real production with these machines, these machines i believe are only to show the machine around, supplied by DN Solitions to them for marketing porposes.

[@kolgrimur8795]

Pipefitter here. glad i love in a world with tolerances in mills and not millionths of an inch lol

[@619sandiego8]

Good video

[@isobar5857]

One question, if I may. Are the micrometers used calibrated at the machine shop temperature, and the inspection dep't temperature, that is, are they both at the same temperature ? As a retired machinist I ask because I had many arguments with the inspection dep't who would come to check 10ft long shafts, coated with tungsten carbide, which I was grinding with diamond wheels to a tolerance of +/- 0.0002". The problem being, the inspection dep't was temperature controlled, but not the workshop ! And since the ground diameter was in order of 6" it really mattered. Enjoyed the video and just subscribed.

[@jayppop3333]

Moving the whole amount you bold man

[@Kyle-xt8ip]

Nice.

[@michaelmacdonough3313]

Travis are you going to do another video with the second operation? How are you going to hold it? Are you going to hold on those thin walls? Wouldn't that be a little sketchy due to those super tight tolerances? Excellent video. I can't wait to see the next one.

[@travisjarrett2355]

Hey Michael, while I can't say on the second video I can say that yes I will grab on to those thin walls. I'll cut some soft jaws to make almost complete contact around the part and I'll turn the chuck pressure down to a minimum. May take a few tweaks on some of the parameters but I'm fairly confident we can hold it.

[@michaelmacdonough3313]

@@travisjarrett2355 Okay. Now I have more questions. Since you're bringing down the chuck pressure and increasing the surface area with the soft jaws, do you look at the coefficient of friction between your soft jaw material and the part, or do you just always use aluminum since it's easy to machine? Will you need to bring down the feeds and speeds on something like this, a second operation? If you do, do you guys have a titans of cnc formula or is it an experience call of how much to bring down those speeds and feeds?

[@ytfan3815]

@@michaelmacdonough3313 Before clamping on the 2nd operation he can put a round piece of material in that first hole that fits perfectly, it clamps with the thin wall, an inner ring with almost the same tolerances, you can make thread in it for a puller. 😉

[@travisjarrett2355]

@@michaelmacdonough3313 I do not look at the coefficient of friction but I like the way you think. I do however lighten my depth of cut and use positive geometry tooling to reduce the pull on the part. Reducing speeds and feeds can help too along with limiting RPM's to a lower max (G97) to reduce any tendency of the jaws pulling out at the reduced pressure. As for a formula we do not have any specific such calculation. We just try to use our experience to machine better than we did yesterday. Day by day.

[@michaelawuku1241]

This guy amazingly a monster.

[@daveyt4802]

Temperature and humidity a factor? Never saw a bore mic before. Cool.

[@buckaroo1949]

Hole test.

[@nhrifle]

Good video. I'm working on a part in 316L now thats challenging. Total tolerance OD/ID has to be held to .0005". One part is good, next is either oversize or undersize, no pattern and no adjustments. What do you suggest?

[@GrahamG1986]

Theres plenty of things at play here. Are you bar feeding? The whipping in the bar behind the chuck can affect the size, make or use a sleeve to stabalize and shorten the bar length i usually do 1.5/2m in length. How far are you out the chuck? i try to keep it within 2.5D or less if i can so it's parting off as close to the chuck without damaging anything. could drop a tip rad size from 0.4 to 0.2mm that helps alot in some applications, also DOC is important as well, it's not always the best to have the finish tool tickle the material away, or you can be getting deflection if your finishing the part and its got a small wall thickness. Using CSS? try not and just use a constant RPM. I find having it closer to the chuck/collet solves alot of chatter/tolerance issues, Also I've had this debate before about running a cold machine and hitting tight tolerances,

[@antekordic]

I'm assuming these inputs are in inches. Anyone can do me a favour and translate it in mm's? Since at my job they thought me to leave 0.25 for finishing pass and then raise both rough and finish for 0.5, do a run and then substract the amount that I measure. It holds most of the time but sometimes it just goes a bit off.

[@buckaroo1949]

.25 mm = .010".

[@hobofrog6416]

Wow holding .0002 with an od mic and .001 with an id mic. impressive! Hope inspection has the same feel at Final!

[@travisjarrett2355]

This is a solid observation. While the feel should hopefully stay the same there is some concern about temperature differences between the shop floor and the inspection room. To address this you can occasionally take a part and let it normalize to the inspection temp and inspect again. That way final agrees with your numbers. Hopefully.

[@opendstudio7141]

In the aerospace industry, all the I.D. mics had lab certified calibrated gauge rings. As long as that standard is maintained it works out.

[@hobofrog6416]

​@@travisjarrett2355 I remember the good old days cutting magnesium +- .0002" in the summer with thermal expansion charts and a prayer! I'm surprised they are not using a .005-.010 set pass to avoid operator input error!

[@hobofrog6416]

@@opendstudio7141 Still an id dial bore gage with a ring or inspection blocks would be easier. it could check out of round and taper conditions also.

[@buckaroo1949]

@@hobofrog6416 GT&D.

[@insane_assailant1197]

Alot have to do if the operator is handling the measuring instruments properly getting the right feel

[@bridged13b]

Seems like your finishing cuts are pretty light. I always like to run a finish pass the same depth of cut as the nose rad. Helps with chip control and finish

[@kw2519]

Yes!!!!! Engaging the proper amount of your tip radius is as important as your feed/speed. Rubbing vs cutting!

[@toddpick8007]

Dont get me wrong Mitutoyo is good but im wary of any kind of digital mic when tolerances are so tight, i always use analog that ive gauge tested first.

[@Ash-ft5su]

I've machined things that shape out of plastic and had a lot of deformation and dimension change from having the thin wall at one side. Any advice on reducing warping in that situation?

[@simonhygrell4426]

lower feeds and speed, inserts that have sharp edges also helps in cutting if you dont have special inserts for plastic it may be much to get inserts specialised for plastic but inserts for aluminum is often quite sharp too, we run mostly stainless in our shop but have aluminum inserts, since we rarely do plastic parts we use aluminum inserts for that

[@xflafi8260]

Do all the roughing, drilling before finishing, take really light finish passes for minimal tool pressure, use sharp and polished inserts as simon has said On long and thin walled parts it may even be neccecary to finish outer with stock on, then inner, outer again and then inner again If the deflection is still too much, consider stress relieving the Material beforehand, especially on PTFE that stuff can be a bitch sometimes

[@travisjarrett2355]

As mentioned sharp tools will help. I would try positive turning inserts (walls of the insert taper inwards) as this will create less cutting forces on the part. Also make sure your finish passes are not followed by any large amounts of material removal (no large roughing operations) as this can cause finished surfaces to warp for sure.

[@ytfan3815]

If possible fill the first hole before clamping on the 2nd operation, put a round piece of material in that first hole that fits perfectly, it clamps together with the thin wall, use an inner ring with almost the same tolerances, you can make thread in it for a puller to pull it out after machining. 😉

[@blairsucks]

I only do this with large tolerance +/- .005. For the small ones I always run it three times once to get the rough finish size. I mark where I need to be then run it again with no change to remove tool pressure then i finish it off. Next part I put it at the size I marked after my first pass. I'm not telling boss I scrap a $500 to save 5 min.

[@johnwilson3668]

The first thing I do is inspect the measuring equipment in the standards room . TIP .Don't place instruments on a warm surface or if you have a glass roof leave in direct sunlight.

[@MasterCraftFishing51]

I use probing cycles on the rough then write a macro to adjust the cutter comp . Run the finish probe cycle on the finish . We run 98% efficiently No scrap . No operator the machines run themselves basically.

[@jaimecruz7275]

how do you program this? Specifically the macro, using common variables? Do you add code once you post your program?

[@mikhaildavydenko6841]

Which probe and tolerances?

[@robotkabot7541]

I'm a bit surprised you guys don't leave a bit more material for the finishing pass. How come? Do you really try to rough to the perfect size already or did I just understand something wrong?

[@Cmtb125]

Nice…

[@damianjurkiewicz3312]

More vids about hitting tolerances and precision manufacturing.

[@jjm693]

Nicely done. Only thing I would do different is pre part the material.

[@travisjarrett2355]

That is a good idea. We might look into that as a possible teaching point in the future.

[@jjm693]

@@travisjarrett2355 depending on the wall thickness of the part you would be surprised at how little wall holding the part will "keep" the shape which is not a good thing. I usually try and leave about .030 wall radially holding parts on to chucking stock so long as I dont have chatter issues.

[@jdstar6352]

Don't the tools erode with use, even carbide? Don't corner radii increase? Doesn't heat build up as the tool becomes dull(er)? Do you compensate for tool wear during a run? Do you monitor tool and/or part temperature during a run to detect tool wear?

[@bryanroyer6872]

How long have you been an operator ?

[@travisjarrett2355]

Yes on all accounts. These are the things you must watch for and control, all to a degree that aligns with the tolerance allowance, the machine capabilities, the environmental conditions, and your skills as a machinist. This job is a consistent mix of attention to detail and problem solving. I love every minute of it.

[@goose103]

How much time did you spend typing that up to try to prove to internet strangers that you know something?

[@simonhygrell4426]

you run different tools for roughing and the final cut

[@bridged13b]

Once an edge wears it deteriates pretty quickly. Change the insert and repeat the process, no point trying to chase wear

[@kw2519]

Consistent tool cut pressure is super crucial in getting these tolerances. But Jesus that boring bar was chattering. Sounds like it’s not engaging enough for the stick out and bar diameter.

[@user-tu9cy9tp2t]

I thought everyone programmed this way on tight tolerances. Say you want to leave .01 stock for the finish pass. instead leave .02 and program 2 passes. First pass put an M0 and in notes (.01 stock) if it checks .015 minus your tool .005 if it checks .005 add .005 to the tool. This is called a "check pass"

[@Nathiuz]

I've heard a similar approached called a "spring pass". Program two moves at the same "coordinate", one to do the major cutting, and the second pass at the same coordinate to relieve the tool tension, and then dial in a finish pass for the remaining 5 thou or so. What are your thoughts on that sort of approach?

[@andersgrundstrom1794]

@@Nathiuz It's a great approach for instance in fine turning when the actual cutting time is about ~30 seconds or so, depending on how tight the tolerance is it can be a great way to score within 0.005mm if you're using something like a VBMT 0.4mm, just beware the flexing after like 20-30 parts when you've worn out the coating. Of course if you're using cermet inserts it's easy to compensate for, but for regular tungsten carbide it's a gamble as soon as it starts to differ from the nominal measurements.

[@jethrrod9382]

Wouldn't you check the rough OD and ID prior to running the finish passes? Just to make sure that the rougher is leaving exactly the proper amount? This technique works best on small part runs IE one or two. If you put a M01 and use the Op stop you can check each tool as they run and make the offset changes as the tool is finished then run the finish tools a last and second time, then all the tools are trimmed in with repeatability for future parts.

[@RiseOfSky]

Wait you only take 0.01 on finish pass? What kind of insert and tip radius do you use to finish od? I use cnmg or wnmg 0.4mm tip and leave about 0.04 stock for finish

[@travisjarrett2355]

I have always had good results with a .010 finish pass (.005 per side). Insert is VNMG .008 (.2mm) nose radius.

[@RiseOfSky]

@@travisjarrett2355 Thanks for replying! will definetly try your way.. I get good enough results but sometimes inconsistant, with oneoff parts i tend to finish them by hand with some fine sandpaper on manual lathe.. im trying to eliminate manual sanding and get parts perfect from machine.

[@travisjarrett2355]

@@RiseOfSky my pleasure. I'm not sure about your machine capabilities but if the machine can do it I would definitely let it. It will save you time for sure.

[@loukola5353]

I too only leave .01 for finish on diameters and .005 on faces. I hit tolerances more consistently then when I was leaving .03 for finish.

[@cyber2526]

what the advantage of drilling holes using live tooling instead conventionally where the spindle turns. does the live tooling achieve higher RPM?

[@xflafi8260]

Centrifugal forces for better chip evacuation

[@travisjarrett2355]

I use live tooling for my small drills as the toolholding is better suited/more versatile. Also, if my drills are a little off center it won't have any negative effects on tool life or hole size.

[@cyber2526]

@@travisjarrett2355 makes sense

[@nickstanley5064]

What's the small arm thing right next to your lathe chuck? Is it to measure the RPM of the spindle or something?

[@eduardolozano3561]

That would be the probe to touch off tools

[@BPond7]

It’s what Eduardo said. The arm will pivot down, and on the end is a probe with a square tip, to touch off tools in X and Z. 🖖😀

[@nickstanley5064]

@@eduardolozano3561 , thanks

[@ytfan3815]

@@nickstanley5064 You can use it also during Operation for Wear Offset and Break Detection, it has multiple functions, btw not on all brands with a Tool Setter, sometimes you need extra Macro's.

[@danhnguyen435]

Boom

[@mc4lifey]

I run this exact same machine and I can’t figure out how to get thru coolant on the live tools? I think it’s the blocks we have, they came with the machine and yours are different.

[@buckaroo1949]

Our new machines had plugs in the turret for the coolant, take them out.

[@1000crazypeople]

Sheeeeeeeeesh

[@3dwezzy740]

Am I right or wrong od is outer diameter and I’d is inner diameter

[@user-kp4en8no4y]

yes or outside/inside

[@nathanthomas8184]

Doing multiple bores is best practice to change offset & if numbers not matching up Should you change the Programme to split those tolerance & same with OD Titan keep on keeping on

[@LordOfChaos.x]

What is an OD I am not familiar with the imperial namings

[@travisjarrett2355]

@@LordOfChaos.x outside diameter.

[@LordOfChaos.x]

@@travisjarrett2355 thank u

[@willyharris4199]

@@LordOfChaos.x I don’t think it’s specifically an imperial name, we call the outer diameter the OD in the UK too

[@LordOfChaos.x]

@@willyharris4199 i am not used to English short-terms

[@ambydaly5713]

As you work to close tolerances are you working in a controlled environment? If not why not. Is inspection working to standards room technique, if not why not. If the customer measures your parts in a controlled environment your parts may be out of tolerance. We had this experience in the 1970s where the machine shop made parts correct but when checked at the same company standards room found to be incorrect. Good luck Ambrose retired QA inspector.

[@gredangeo]

I find it kinda surprising that you're just going balls out on that offset in one pass, for such a tight tolerance. I find that hard to believe. But this does make the video shorter, and give the proper concept. Something that tight should be needing many spring cuts. Because who knows what's really bending more under load. Could be the part or the tool. Sometimes the machine doesn't like you that hour, and says nope.

[@mikhaildavydenko6841]

Proper workholding, good toolholder, inserts, speeds and feeds and machine makes this happen everyday when you press “Cycle start” button 👌

[@koolmexican721]

@@mikhaildavydenko6841 Unfortunately not every program is made by an engineer/programmer with these things in mind. A good machinist will always account for spring with tight tolerances.

[@bryanroyer6872]

So he has that good of a feel because we all know those mics and be forgiving . How was the runout ?

[@travisjarrett2355]

I was catching around 50 millionths on rotation. Not too bad in my opinion.

[@brandons9138]

Run out should be as good as the bearings in the machine. This is a first op part I'm guessing. Run out OD to ID should be damn near zero because they were cut with single point tools.

[@bryanroyer6872]

@@travisjarrett2355 how do you buck your chuck like that ?

[@ytfan3815]

Hi Travis, change your Post-processor LOL, I saw your videos on crashing a lathe, but your Tool indexing s_cks. I see Tool changes close to the chuck and then retract your turret in Z 😂, one day you'll hit that chuck with a big U-drill .. 😆 Have a wonderful Christmas 🎄 🎅

[@travisjarrett2355]

Lol. Yeah it gets close at times. I used to retract all the way home before tool changes but to be honest I've got pretty comfortable with the retract in X only. Saves some time but it does feel like a bit of "faith" at times. Have a great Christmas as well my friend.

[@ytfan3815]

@@travisjarrett2355 You too sir, and always .... safety first. 😉

[@colinbagshaw1796]

Do a capability check on your measuring gear, it may read to 4 digits, but it may not repeat to that especially those 3 jaw bore mikes…

[@geronimobassman7716]

Really when america will discover metric system, you gonna be amazed !!!! so much simple...

[@MrEdward159]

Gage cuts, rough a grove before parting of , should have no problem holding the 0

[@drawmaster77]

that is 1/5th of micron tolerance? I don't know much about CNCs but this is insane! How soon will the tolerances be measured in atoms lol?

[@runejakobsen9958]

This is in inches, not millimeters.

[@drawmaster77]

@@runejakobsen9958 ah

[@loukola5353]

.0002 inches is 5 micron.

[@clubdjmarcus]

Instead of M00 and then having to take those out again, use M01. That one can be turned off and on again at will with a button. I always use M01 before every toolchange so the first time a program runs I can check every tool and it's work. Then simply turn off the option stop and let it run.

[@pupetxls2]

Or /M0. Block skip uncheck at setup, checked for production

[@jonahdement4379]

I think he used the M00 to only stop after the finishing ops. If he used M01, he would have to hit cycle start after each op.

[@clubdjmarcus]

@@pupetxls2 I generally work with machines that are 30 years old, some even older. Most have the M01 option stop, but I haven't really worked with machines from this century. I assume your answer applies to newer machines... Not everyone is that lucky though not everyone gets to use a 10meter long vertical mill: 10.000x1.100x2.400mm travel on my 1987 Mecof that has a Tapedrive and Punchcard... OLD-SCHOOL!

[@clubdjmarcus]

@@jonahdement4379 when doing the first run, that wouldn't actually cost much time since the operator is there anyway for initial setup and testing. Also you could have the machine stop after it's current job/tool by the flick of a switch without having to time it. But I guess that's a preference thing. We/I use M00 only when actually needed for things like chip removal or other instructions to the operator while the program is running.

[@patlaird4188]

I'm used to Haas. He must know his machine to make that adjustment and it will do that.

[@runejakobsen9958]

And using correct measuring-tools is important. An external micrometer and threepoint internal micrometer is not correct on small tolerances.

[@buckaroo1949]

Plug and ring gauges work well also.

[@vettepicking]

Maybe to check the mic with a standard first before measuring down to a tenth..

[@eddrm4685]

ZOMBIEMILL!

[@juliuscaesar7715]

Do machinists use gloves? I thought it is not safe to use gloves while working.

[@eddiemendoza6259]

Where's all the Swiss machines

[@patrickuchmanowicz3252]

I would have gone with a bigger boring bar but hey..some people don't mind the sound of chatter.

[@ytfan3815]

And what will happen with the back of that bigger boring bar on that small hole in the center, I even wonder if this boring bar was small enough, we missed a lot of stock removal on that cone, that's not one pass. 😉

[@patrickuchmanowicz3252]

@@ytfan3815 ahh.

[@sankarsiva8053]

Sir iam india tamilnadu please I have learn cnc machine pls tamil language I am interested sir pls

[@lumpygasinavacuum8449]

If you are trying to reach people who don't know this procedure where do you put the offset? I know but what if it got put in the wrong offset? What is plus or minus on an ID or OD? Are you like so many other machinists I've worked with absolutely useless when requesting assistance and think not complicated tasks not real high intelligence level tasks you can complete but maybe the next guy needs help not a trap? Or is it you don't know how people learn because you can't place yourself back into not knowing? Wasn't part of getting the job you now have an agreement to want to teach? Didn't you express an interest in wanting to help the trade? If I can help you teach each time you do anything explain the total how and the why please don't just help people just possibly crash machines. So Everytime you touch the control explain exactly what you are doing how you get to that address on the control maybe contrast what the different numbers are what happens if you put a number in the wrong place. Treat teaching as though a person has no clue. That's my opinion.

[@Glenrok]

Wimp. Just rip into it. If it’s wrong- correct it on the next part......😉

[@zarathean8758]

why does it look like a suppresor baffle 🤔🍻

[@jamesbell7661]

Gravy train

[@tone3560]

You shouldn't offset it at the machine and the programmer should do that in the program....

[@GrumpyMachinist]

If you don't know this you shouldn't be setting up/programming any machine...

[@Austin17070]

This is a bad practice and only used by lazy programmers or for one-off parts. For tight tolerances, I always program a "set pass" that is .005" DOC (give or take, depending on the material) offset from the finish dimension. It gives the operator a chance to dial in their tool offsets, which is usually less than half a thou if they set their tools correctly. Once they get it dialed in, they update their tool offset and run the finish pass. This way, the tools in the machine are always set very close to their true cutting size.

[@guisado1002]

I love watching i don't understand

[@manuelsalinas686]

Old machinists are like old generals.they never fade alway. They just loose their tolerance. Yuk,yuk,

[@BRANDON-IRON009]

I hate how Titan uses " Perfect " constantly in his videos...its machining NOTHING IS EVER PERFECT