THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE WAS NOT BASED ON LIVE-LONG LOVE ! MARRIAGES WERE ARRANGED BY SOCIAL STATUS; TO BUILD ALLIANCES; GAIN POWER AND / OR WEALTH ! THE IDEA A MARRIAGE HAS TO BE BASED ON LOVE -TILL DEATH DEPARTS THEM- IS RELATIVELY NEW ; 20 CENTURY BASICALLY! THAT´S THE REASON MARRIAGES DON´T HOLD ANYMORE ; IT´S ALSO FACT THAT THE AVERAGE TIME FOR A MARRIAGE USED TO BE 10 YEARS - NOW IT SHOULD LAST FOR 40, 50 .... YEARS !!
@theonecounttheonecount8477Ай бұрын
Absolutely not!
@theonecounttheonecount8477Ай бұрын
@mountbatten222 I believe Jesus hates divorce. That's what He said.
@mountbatten2222Ай бұрын
@@theonecounttheonecount8477 WHERE DID JESUS SAY ANYTHING ABOUT DIVORCE OR EVEN MARRIAGE ?! JESUS HATES LIARS; BETRAYALS; THIEVES THAT´S WHY HE IS PUNISHING PEOPLE LIKE DIANA !
@JoanMorrison-vq2jcАй бұрын
@@mountbatten2222 Careful. God forgave Diana and Charles and Camilla. Our Lord didn't want Diana injured and killed in a car crash but Dodi was supposedly shouting for the driver to go faster and the driver was drunk and Diana didn't have her safety belt on and the car was a rebuilt vehicle and the photographers and reporters were probably swerving to get a few pictures and everyone was in a tunnel in the evening and...
@gracebarrett6064Ай бұрын
Charles doing everything he can to protect Camilla from the press but abandoning Diana from the get go re the same subject is painful to see
@gigidodson11 күн бұрын
To see it happening to her son is tragic. Harry is culpable, then again so was Diana.
@LoveLady-wn3eg2 ай бұрын
This is so sad. I fully know the pain of loving a man, only to find out later, the hard way, after you've served the purpose for him, that he really doesnt love you back. At least not in the same intensity that you love him.
@uptonogood1893Ай бұрын
It was an arranged marriage. How much did she really love him? Was she in love with Charles, or being Queen one day?
@AversiontostupidityАй бұрын
A marriage didn't work out as planned, just get over with it. Why these disgusting victim card playing drama?
@JoanMorrison-vq2jcАй бұрын
@@LoveLady-wn3eg You are correct. It is sad. This triangle is sad because of their decision making. Camilla is cheating on her husband because Andrew was fooling around so much and Charles FINALLY tells Diana that he is in love with Camilla two days before the wedding and Diana goes through with the wedding because only through Charles can Diana gain the title of Princess of Wales that she so badly needed and wanted. They were ALL four wrong!! 😔😔😔😔.
@gbondupson27 күн бұрын
I'm sorry you experienced that.
@juicyfruit3822 ай бұрын
Camilla and Charles complaining about Diana when it was the two of them that bought them all to this situation. How did they think she was going to react.
@here_we_go_again25712 ай бұрын
Both Charles and Diana were very unrealistic. I only wish that Mr. Andrew Parker-Bowles and his Mrs. had been assigned an overseas post (I am sure that Prince Philip could have arranged it) to get her away from Diana and Charles early in the marriage. If he had not been able to easily and openly been (his social set covered for him) with her (I'm pretty sure her husband knew about it) then he might have made more of an effort to work with Diana BOTH Charles and Diana needed intense marriage counseling.
@enjoyingmyvodka10132 ай бұрын
Agreed! They did this and poor Diana got caught in the middle! They caused her so much pain! Charles was also envious of Diana’s popularity!!!!
@CaAnPeSe4ever2 ай бұрын
Please! Diana was no saint or 'victim'. She fooled around on Charles before he started up with Camilla again. That doesn't excuse Charles, but in the end, both were at fault for the demise of their marriage.
@enjoyingmyvodka10132 ай бұрын
@@CaAnPeSe4ever true plus one of her lovers looks a lot like Harry. I remember that there was a scandal where Harry was willing to take a dna test to prove he was Charles son but the RF apparently didn’t allow it because of it was negative it would be an even bigger scandal 😂 I heard that if it had happened Harry now a days could lose his Prince title and everything.
@Mapqwerry2 ай бұрын
She did the settlement in case she or her children needed options. Wisely, I think that she knew that Harry was going to be the wild card and needed to have some options. I am not saying that Meghan or Harry were correct in their approach. But Diana could see that the hereditary roles were a pair of golden handcuffs
@kylehollie2 ай бұрын
Outrage she has to suffer what about Diana? She suffered the most, loving someone who didn’t love her back.
@Loralai1012 ай бұрын
but why would she love someone who didn't love her back?
@HisameArtwork2 ай бұрын
@@Loralai101 cuz he was the prince and full of money and status. many woman say they love that. see megan markle and camila.
@RandomThotАй бұрын
Why is it so difficult to empathies with someone who can't love you back - I mean everyone has a right to make their choices (however love is hardly a choice i guess...more of an accident :)) - just because someone feels for a person shouldn't necessarily mean that you expect a return - Charles simply couldn't love her - what is unfortunate is both of them were used as a pawn in teh game of monarchy/church.
@uptonogood1893Ай бұрын
It was an arranged marriage. How much did she really love him? Was she in love with Charles, or being Queen one day?
@JoanMorrison-vq2jcАй бұрын
@@uptonogood1893 Very well said!! Diana wouldn't have looked twice at Charles If he was a butcher or a baker or a candle stick maker. Diana just wanted a title and castles and balcony appearances and clothes and jewelry and vacations and notoriety and prestige and financial stability and handbags and respect and admiration and press coverage and should I go on? Not everything can be blamed on Camilla and Charles infidelity or Diana's youth.
@mayaalieva9382 ай бұрын
I know it's not fair to put all the blame on one person's shoulders, but come now. Charles was a 30 year old man, Diana was a 19 year old girl. And yes Diana does grow up and makes mistakes, but it can be said that it was because of the position she was put into by these people, and yes even the man she was married to. If Camilla was claiming to be a wonderful and mature person, and the kind of person, Charles was raving on about, she would have had enough grace to not encourage all of this, especially if it was to avoid all that negative attention, and the sneers she still gets behind her back. She knew exactly what she was doing. Charles should have picked someone who would be prepared for this kind of life, whether or not he would continue to cheat, I don't know, but he should have never been forced to marry and neither should have Diana.
@Theresav60Ай бұрын
Cowmilla is a TRAMP WITH NO CLASS ❗️
@JoanMorrison-vq2jcАй бұрын
@@Theresav60 DIANA was a TRAMP WITH NO CLASS, FIRST !!! Hmmm. Maybe Camilla learned from Diana...
@uptonogood1893Ай бұрын
It was an arranged marriage. How much did she really love him? Was she in love with Charles, or being Queen one day? And those who complained about Charles shouldn't have been forced to marry. He wasn't. He could have had no children like the first Elizabeth. He was only forced to marry someone for their bloodline for the heir.
@JoanMorrison-vq2jcАй бұрын
@@uptonogood1893 Well said. I agree. I often wondered if they just used each other? Diana knew ONLY Charles could give her that title of Princess of Wales and eventually queen 👑 and maybe Charles thought he should just get on with his own family life?
@adaoramadike3543Ай бұрын
Charles met Camilla in the early seventies and through out the years after the she got married, they were still weaving in and out of each other’s life. Camilla moved on, it was Charles who refused to let go of Camilla, if he so loved her, he should have given up his status as a prince and married her but no. He wanted to be king, used Diana to have children and went straight back to Camilla. Charles had no right to have agreed to any marriage to anyone if he still carried a torch for Camilla all these years. If he hadn’t ended up with Diana, he would have still married any other woman and expect her to put up with Camilla. After all he told Diana that he will not be the only prince of Wales who will not have a mistress. Camilla was non negotiable. Charles and Camilla are extremely selfish people. She was ready and willing to be Charles’ mistress for life, a very immoral woman.
@mellyreedMRАй бұрын
Its so disgusting that Charles did for Camilla what he purposefully refused to do for his wife.
@ticketyblue3080Ай бұрын
These people are so bratty and spoiled. They take no accountability. Diana wasn't being unreasonable. She birthed a king. Now I know where William gets his attitude.
@t3hpenguinofd00mАй бұрын
Where *William* gets his attitude, huh.
@chinavaughan6383Ай бұрын
More like where William gets his strength🙂
@ZahidHossain-lz2td26 күн бұрын
william got his attitude from his father, his granny and his aunt. His brother however is the replica of diana
@Clairecutie8418 күн бұрын
@@ZahidHossain-lz2tdnah
@AgentClaytonWebb2 ай бұрын
Maybe literally these two shouldn’t have been adulterers… lol
@mrsbluesky84152 ай бұрын
I just don’t feel any sympathy for Charles & Camilla here. They brought it on themselves and expected Diana to just accept it and play ball. Well, it’s been 25 years and water under the bridge but so many lives were hurt.
@seanp2871Ай бұрын
In fairness, Diana started having affairs before Charles and Camilla got back together. Now, the reason for that was because she and Charles were so thoroughly incompatible that it was destined to fail, but still.
@urahotmess2 ай бұрын
And Diana demanded she got her money IN CASH! 🤣
@saraneuss40892 ай бұрын
The mistress complaining about caught by the public cheating. Ridiclious
@yevgeniyaleshchenko8492 ай бұрын
She doesn't complain about being ''caught for cheating'' but about media circus. Also, by the point Charles and Camilla got back together, his marriage with Diana was over for all intents and purposes. Diana was having her own affairs, so no need for this hypocrisy.
@gnostic2682 ай бұрын
@@yevgeniyaleshchenko849No need to cover for a married woman cheating with a married man and making it seem wonderful. No need for your hypocrisy either.
@thesimslover828842 ай бұрын
@@gnostic268Who did Diana cheat with that was married?
@JoanMorrison-vq2jc2 ай бұрын
@@thesimslover82884 You might want to go online for their names because unfortunately there are many. Diana ruined a few innocent wives and children's home lives. I doubt Diana had too much of a conscience. These wives should have gone on Oprah instead of Harry and Me-gain. It's a shame Diana didn't have Tommy Lascelles in her life back then. He would have set her straight! He retired before she married Charles. She would have walked two feet in one shoe! QE was too easy on Diana and Fergie! They had too much fun and time on their hands! QE should have kept them on a short leash! Diana seemed to lack commitment and devotion to her charities and duties.
@AndyBluebear-fi9omАй бұрын
In a way, Diana was the real mistress, and Camilla the long term love.
@dcmonsterreviews29872 ай бұрын
My heart always went to Diana. Charles was a scumbag.
@LillianCenteno-u3r14 күн бұрын
I think he was a tampon.
@darkpninja15 күн бұрын
Casting this very handsome actor as Chruckles was incredibly kind to Chuckles who never, ever, in his entire miserable life looked this good.
@cloudburstlia456Ай бұрын
And then she died suspiciously and got his money back? Is that what happened? Poor woman he was never gonna let her live in peace.
@AnneCassidy-f4tАй бұрын
I agree! Get rid of Chuck & let William rule!!!
@zajournalsАй бұрын
Hopefully Charles's reign will be short.
@ems901Ай бұрын
She played the zoning out really well
@susandaniels9733Ай бұрын
He was worth 650 million pounds at the time,35 was a bargain.but Iike a little boy he cries that its not fair.she was the mother of his 2 children and she stoicially put up with his affair for almost 15 yrs.on the surface he might be a king but below hes trash like that crone he married.
@kevinlongman00716 күн бұрын
She got £17 million.
@caroleverist31922 ай бұрын
Charles and Diana should never had married. She’s was a a young girl and they had nothing in common . I think she’s a bit blinded by becoming a princess
@cg8397Ай бұрын
After her unstable childhood, she expected stability with a narcissist who had his own share of mental health problems.
@yushikuang787724 күн бұрын
Charles and Camilla are living in another era. He really think as a future King, everyone will serve him and he doesn’t need to accommodated anyone else. Camilla is such a entitled person and absolutely flattered his highest’s sentiments and doesn’t see any immortality but cries about their “obstacles”. They are mint for each others! Diana is in the opposite of the spectrum: well hearted and full of compassion. I believe if she is still alive, she will have mature and will finally open her eyes to see the man she had idealise isn’t worth to be heartbroken! He isn’t the knight that she was waiting for…😢
@BamaFan-vc4gn9 күн бұрын
Diana had choices. She'd been queen today if She'd played her cards rights. As the Queen Mother said, "it's always been this way" the night before the wedding. Royal men had always had mistresses.
@SakuraSymphony2 ай бұрын
The comments section on these videos...😮💨It's wild watching people demonize Diana...we've gotten so used to praising, rebranding, and embracing villainous acts, that now we call the victims 'entitled, spoiled cry babies' seriously? Anyone who has been bullied knows how bullies operate... especially bullies with POWER and how victims are often seen as bringing the abuse upon themselves *gross* Oy, this era is soooo wild :(
@judithwalthers51282 ай бұрын
The Royal family got what they wanted,a heir to the throne and the hell with Diana and everyone else,, That's okay, because we all answer to God and no Royal can get around that, Diana May you rest in peace 🤗♥️🕯️🕊️🙏✝️
@ManjeetKumar-pe8oz2 ай бұрын
I agree with you
@raynethackery12 ай бұрын
Would be ironic if William was just playing along until he takes the throne, and then pushes for the dismantlement of the Monarchy. I know that's wishful thinking but an interesting idea, nonetheless.
@JR478462 ай бұрын
@@raynethackery1 looking at british people hability (or lack of it) to make informed decisions when voting and looking at their choices for the last years i dont think you would be any better with a president on the contrary
@bunclip2 ай бұрын
@@JR47846 despite all the choices, tories Labour tories Labour always the same.
@mountbatten22222 ай бұрын
THE HEIR TO THE TROHN IS A BASTARD BY HER TENNIS COACH AND HENRY BY HER STABLEMASTER !! THEREFORE THE HOUSE OF WINDSOR WILL END AFTER CHARLES AND SOME TENNISPLAYE´SR SON IS KING OF THE UK ! THAT BACKFIRED ON THE WINDSOR !!
@marilynmalone62472 ай бұрын
Gezz, it's been 20 yrs let the woman rest in Peace!
@zhangshiyucaoАй бұрын
She's dead, she's resting in peace, we don't wanna give C&C any peace 😂
@JoanMorrison-vq2jcАй бұрын
@@zhangshiyucao Lots of love and fun and happiness to HER ROYAL MAJESTY QUEEN CAMILLA 💗💐 and King Charles! Oh. Yeah. You both have all of that!! LoL 🤣 🤣. The coronation was a fun time too! Good for you 😀😀😀!! 🌸🌸🌹🌹
@dawoodyasir6 күн бұрын
@@JoanMorrison-vq2jcNah Cowmilla is shaking- Disgusting mistress
@mudasirnoor48702 ай бұрын
I love Diana.
@FullTimePatient372 ай бұрын
To This day now that Charles and Camilla are king and queen, I still can't stand then
@Thepateisgreat2 ай бұрын
I feel like Diana and Charles had the same issues. Too many of them. They couldn’t even it out. But if there was no Camilla, and they had actually really really tried and stick together with no affairs, it may have worked. I would have given anything to see her be crowned queen beside him a few years ago, she’s the best queen England never had and the true Queen.
@karthinidevi229518 күн бұрын
If I were in the Queen's place, I would let Charles choose between the crown & Camilla. This way, if theirs was true love, they would have chosen each other. And, if Camilla's target was throne, their relationship would have come to an end. And, would have made Anne or Diana sit on the throne (making history).
@martinkrukenberg45902 ай бұрын
Camilla is the mother, Charles never had, and a lover in one
@HisameArtwork2 ай бұрын
the film really is leaning into that narrative.
@shikamarunara2952 ай бұрын
Charles's own twisted little dream come true, what a piece of sh!t
@shmataboro86342 күн бұрын
Sounds very John and Yoko, doesn't it?
@marshatolbert1542 ай бұрын
Charles and Camilla got what they deserved.
@JoanMorrison-vq2jc2 ай бұрын
Yes. Yes! They sure did! They FINALLY got each other and they are very very happy together for the past 19 years!! Good for HER ROYAL MAJESTY QUEEN CAMILLA 💖❤️🎉🎉!!
@shikamarunara2952 ай бұрын
They can both rot
@cg8397Ай бұрын
@@JoanMorrison-vq2jcNot really, in the long-term Diana wins and not Camilla. Her son William becomes King and she, barring some strange twist of history, will be the ancestor of all the future British monarchs. Camilla will be just a footnote as the unnecessary second wife of Charles III. (Marriage to a menopausal woman who can't have children doesn't make sense for normal people, let alone royalty.)
@josefinebliss280123 күн бұрын
@@JoanMorrison-vq2jc Im sure you can relate to being the other woman that the man you cheat with wouldnt want to marry and show himself in public with. Anyone else doesnt support cowmilla
@teddypawncrumps233 күн бұрын
@@JoanMorrison-vq2jclicking their royal boots won’t get you their praise
@Missy-d8bАй бұрын
Charles & Diana & Harry & Megsy, two marriages that should have not taken place IMO.
@Hammbaggar4 күн бұрын
I'm sorry why did they randomly change the actors half way through the show
@evanpeay11 күн бұрын
she had a big hand in the break-down
@here_we_go_again25712 ай бұрын
Both Charlie and Diana made their problems all about the other rather than looking squarely at their own shortcomings! She may have been a loose cannon; but Charles was setting her off frequently because he would not even try to understand where her head was at. *I have always felt very sorry for Diana, Princess of Wales.* *I can understand why she was so lonely and needy* (i.e. her very dysfunctional childhood) I can also understand why a "normal person", someone like Hasnat Khan would not want to stay in a relationship with someone who generated a media circus wherever she went. Two years, (1995-1997) would have seemed like an eternity for a person who had heavy responsibilities at work concerning other peoples' lives. (And who was not the father of her children. Being a step-parent, is another bag of worms/pandora's box) Sadly, given Diana's personality; I am afraid that she would eventually attract the wrong kind of person and become like one of those socialites along the lines of Barbara Hutton (Woolworth heiress) or Doris Duke (whose father was the tobacco and hydroelectric power tycoon James Buchanan Duke) Or for that matter, someone who led a vacuous life like the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.
@yevgeniyaleshchenko8492 ай бұрын
You make good points. To me it also seems that Charles was also somewhat needy and seeking validation so he couldn't give it to anyone else. He also needed a more ''solid'' or ''stable'' partner. Unfortunately, seems like they were inherently incompatible from the start.
@here_we_go_again25712 ай бұрын
@@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 I agree: >"Unfortunately, seems like they were inherently incompatible from the start."< I do not think that having Camilla around helped Diana and Charles though.
@livingincaptivityIII2 ай бұрын
She already had attracted the wrong kind of person. She died with him.
@here_we_go_again25712 ай бұрын
@@livingincaptivityIII She certainly did not choose wisely.
@JoanMorrison-vq2jc2 ай бұрын
@@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 Maybe they both slogged through difficult childhoods and they were looking for people who were as you said "solid". Obviously Charles found Camilla but Diana didn't find her soulmate because she couldn't become settled enough or mature enough. She really did go from man to man and towards the end of her life her public support was dwindling. I'm guessing Diana only wanted fame and notoriety. Maybe love came second? Hmmm 🤔.
@outinsider2 ай бұрын
I do have a hard time with the portrayal of Charles and Camilla as victims. Charles is a victim of an institution he upholds. Camilla is a victim of Charles. Diana was no saint, but you don't lure someone into a trap, have them get caught, try the conventional ways of getting out just to realize you have to be unconvetional about it and pursue the unconventional then blame them for the unconventional way they got out of it. In a divorce, everyone gets hurt. In the public eye, more people than just the immediate parties get hurt. I cannot imagine why Camilla still says with Charles given the many times he sold her out.
@cg8397Ай бұрын
She stays with him because she has nowhere else to go. Her fate was sealed when he outed her publicly with the Dimbleby interview, her husband had no choice but to divorce her. Her children are now also adults with their own lives and their own personal problems.
@outinsiderАй бұрын
@@cg8397 Understandable, but I wonder how many of her children's personal problems are stemmed from the infidelities both parents actively participated in. She may have no where else to go, but I guess she has that in common with Diana. No where else to go and a man-child who will sell out them the minute they don't let him get his way.
@christinecarroll417625 күн бұрын
Difficult to feel any sympathy for either Charles or Camilla, however I do feel that the institution of monarchy itself is also to blame. How many monarchs throughout history actually married for love? I would wager not many, Diana was the victim of an age old system that expected her to put up and shut up, smile politely, produce children and not complain about the fact that her husband loved someone else.
@ilxvtz2 ай бұрын
مجرد تمثيل وتقطع قلبي عليها لو أشوفها بالواقع شلون ؟
@AnneCassidy-f4tАй бұрын
Cant wait for charles to step down & disappear from the public with his conniving wife & let william become king!!
@Indy446368 күн бұрын
Camila x charles diana has more cards then you
@monicavecchiati8835Ай бұрын
ARRANGED MARRIAGE
@VenaMediaLLC-dz9lr3iz4f5 күн бұрын
Diana should have made her demands and got more than what she asked for..That family would not exist like it does today without the two children she brought into the marriage.The fact is all of England know he used her...really Married her under false pretenses.. When he Married... Camilla had took herself out of consideration by marrying another..even if the palace changed their mind to let them Wed...it was too late......She should have left him alone.. respected his new Wife/ Marriage..and the family they created together...I don't know if she will ever be fully accepted....because she was always in their lives...waiting for her opportunity.. Kinda think of how different things would be if they stayed together in the right way..
@kristinhall8435Ай бұрын
Guaranteed Rachael has memorized this scene for her impending divorce.
@deedee353023 күн бұрын
The way they are burning thru his money, she won't get much of a deal. Karma.
@Annais121119 күн бұрын
This is how two narcissists react to an empath truths.
@lisamcmullan6484Ай бұрын
35 million doesnt sound that much in reality
@weronikagancarz312219 күн бұрын
Weronika 😄
@micheleford428224 күн бұрын
this is just sick diana wasnt being unreasonable
@joannegregory30246 күн бұрын
Charles and his mistress are disgraceful…….. she no Queen and never will be
@AversiontostupidityАй бұрын
That's the real face of every gold digger...publicly they left no stone unturned to express their bitterness towards their ex, but while taking money, they don't have any self respect
@doroteamalheiros471328 күн бұрын
Pigstile
@menglu36712 ай бұрын
As a non british, i could never understand why people liked Diana so much. She seems like a whiny, self absorbed person who puts herself above all else. She should have never married into the British royal family if she is so against so much that they stand for. She wanted the fame, money and all the benefits of the royal family but refuse to accept anything that inconveniences her. She does whatever she wants without thinking about how it impacts other people. Seems quite selfish imo.
@JoanMorrison-vq2jc2 ай бұрын
Diana USED Charles for a title and castles and balcony appearances and clothes and jewelry and vacations and notoriety and prestige and financial stability and handbags and respect and admiration and press coverage and should I go on? Diana wouldn't have looked at Charles twice if he was a butcher or a baker or a candle stick maker! Not everything can be blamed on Camilla and Charles infidelity or Diana's youth.
@MsJubjubbirdАй бұрын
the 80s were a different time. Disney reigned supreme and people loved the idea of the Disney princess. Dina was young, blonde and beautiful.
@JoanMorrison-vq2jcАй бұрын
@@MsJubjubbird Like most of us, Diana enormously bought into all that fairy tale stuff 😞😞. Ungrateful and wildly plotting came about a difficult Diana. She made a nightmare out of her own dream! Charles probably was not about to let go of Camilla because she truly is his soulmate. I wonder if Charles was so determined to make Camilla QUEEN because maybe Charles wanted to take revenge on the UK for treating Camilla so badly and Charles saw how much the people and the media hurt Camilla and also because no one in the UK understood Charles' agony over Diana? Diana was really a witch on wheels!
@ladyjustice1474Ай бұрын
Did you live her life for her? No? Then take your negative comments elsewhere
@JoanMorrison-vq2jcАй бұрын
@@menglu3671 Very good points here! I noticed that Diana was trying her best to teach the royal family "the common touch and how to take care of their staff and to treat them like human beings". And then I read about Diana firing some of the people in Charles's staff and screaming at her staff and Diana's vulgar four letter screaming at her staff until they left her! Diana was the boss from hell. A witch on wheels!!
@karensinclair19542 ай бұрын
Princess Diana was such a whinny self absorbed person.
@tessie7e7772 ай бұрын
As opposed to Charles whining about not being able to cheat on his wife without repercussions?and you do know the point of therapy is to focus on yourself, right?
@JoanMorrison-vq2jc2 ай бұрын
@@tessie7e777 Diana USED Charles for a title and castles and balcony appearances and clothes and jewelry and vacations and notoriety and prestige and financial stability and handbags and respect and admiration and press coverage and should I go on? Diana wouldn't have looked at Charles twice if he was a butcher or a baker or a candle stick maker! Not everything can be blamed on Camilla and Charles infidelity or Diana's youth.
@cg8397Ай бұрын
@@JoanMorrison-vq2jcDiana was from the aristocracy, of course she was expected to marry well and had been raised as such.
@BellaRainDrops2 ай бұрын
Spoiled child Diana.
@mountbatten22222 ай бұрын
THE GIRL WHO WANTED FUN AND REFUSED TO GROW INTO THE ROLE SHE MARRIED IN !
@gnostic2682 ай бұрын
Charles was more spoiled and Camilla has aged like milk.
@claireangier33222 ай бұрын
She was used to supply the children. Camilla too old and passed it.
@suzannepatterson34452 ай бұрын
She was raised in emotional abuse and neglect. It wouldn't have mattered who she married. The scars inflicted in childhood would have made it nearly impossible for her to have a normal, healthy marriage at 19. Charles had similar scars. Together it was close to impossible for their marriage to succeed, at least not without a lot of work. Maybe if they'd stuck it out they'd have learned how to overcome the baggage they brought into their marriage. Perhaps that's Camilla's greatest sin, that she didn't stay away and give them that time.
@mountbatten22222 ай бұрын
@@suzannepatterson3445 DIANA DIDN´T LIKE HER MOTHER; HER STEPMOTHER AND WAS TOLD BY HER GRANDMOTHER " YOU WILL NOT FIT INTO THE ROYAL FAMILY ; YOU ARE AN ACTRESS; A SCHEMER " SEEMS IT WAS DIANA WHO WAS THE SPOILED CHILD AND NOT THE FAMILY WHO WAS TO BLAME ; SHE REFUSED TO GROW INTO THE ROLE SHE MARRIED IN AND WANTED TO REMAIN "THE GIRL WHO WANTS TO HAVE FUN" - WITH HER 30 SEX PARTNERS ; WHAT RESULTED IN THE TWO BASTARD BOYS; SHE LAY CHARLES IN THE NET !!
@R3dp055um2 ай бұрын
I was underwhelmed by the performance of this actress. I'm not saying she did badly, but at least for me, she failed to portray a credible Diana.
@Transformer-x6tАй бұрын
Lmao
@Thepateisgreat2 ай бұрын
I feel like Diana and Charles had the same issues. Too many of them. They couldn’t even it out. But if there was no Camilla, and they had actually really really tried and stick together with no affairs, it may have worked. I would have given anything to see her be crowned queen beside him a few years ago, she’s the best queen England never had and the true Queen.