Did Dinosaurs Really Have Feathers?

[@TREYtheExplainer]

Awesome job with this one! Very accurate and handled extremely well

[@angeliesalvebernardez8587]

It's so funny that Velociraptors and Tyrannosaurs don't have feathers, anyway they are running naked in cold weather. I like to see Theropods in Scientifically Accurate form, like Velociraptors in Hawk's feathers.

[@MineKynoMine]

+TREY the Explainer Good to see you around Trey! When's the next vid?

[@ap9413]

hhhhhhhuuuuuuuuuu!!!!! You're here!

[@jamesdorman5372]

TREY the Explainer i am feather worshipers thi video is good

[@balthiersgirl2658]

TREY the Explainer hi trey your vids are the very best

[@SpecialAgentCake]

"...fluffy feathered poodle from hell." -SciShow 2015

[@matthew4997]

+tiaxanderson Scishow was quoting actual scientists there

[@JonnysGameChannel]

+Special Agent Cake "Fluffyfeatheredpoodlefromhell-osaurus"

[@Sharkasaurusemperor1]

I prefer wolf-hawk

[@Fuzzmunky]

+Special Agent Cake *tips hat*

[@nickopeters]

Have you ever had an actual poodle? They're not mild-mannered dogs.

[@FreeDjinn]

Dinosaurs of a feather rock together

[@GrimM0nk3y]

Pahahahahaha I git it you funny, I like you kid

[@FreeDjinn]

Junior Cerna Wasn't till after I typed it that I saw the double meaning in it.

[@GrimM0nk3y]

+Free Djinn even better you're so cool you didn't even have to try, I'm going to bake you some cookies

[@FreeDjinn]

Junior Cerna Flattery will get you everywhere with me :P

[@GrimM0nk3y]

+Free Djinn haha (^U°)

[@alainischileno]

for some reason i read the title as "Did Dinosaurs Really Have Feelings?". i was like whaa

[@ryanm7263]

+Alain Rochette Many of today's large bird species have complex emotional lives. Dinosaurs may well have had feelings too!

[@alainischileno]

Ryan MacFarlane I know, but usually when someone puts "...REALLY..", it means they're skeptical. in this case, that hank was skeptical that dinosaurs actually had feelings

[@FlameSpark2013]

+Alain Rochette Well some probably didn't, such as brontosaurs, as they didn't need to care for their young. So they wouldn't have had a need for them. But things like T-Rex, absolutely did, because they did care for their young! It's cool!!

[@soluiz]

brontosaurus is not real. *bursts bubble

[@soluiz]

brontosaurus is not real. *bursts bubble

[@alexventimilla6910]

@SciShow Hey guys, I love the show. Just a quick correction, the Chinese fossil shown at @1:19 is a Microraptor, not an Archaeopteryx. It's my favorite dinosaur, so I would know.

[@SciShow]

+Alex Ventimilla Thank you for the correction. We just annotated the title on that image.

[@superfishman3243]

+SciShow This is science, everyone makes mistakes. That is why we do it again, and again.

[@AlexJasso100]

Wait. Is the microraptor your favorite? Or the Archaeoteryx?

[@verisimuli]

+AlexJasso100 Since he recognized the fossil and was able to name it, it's safe to assume that the Microraptor is his favorite.

[@theslymessenger5313]

+swf Or maybe he knows what the Archaeopteryx fossil looks like and was able to say that that fossil wasn't it.

[@1234kalmar]

->Zooms in on rock ->Looks at mincrostructure ->The feather was red. Gosh I foken Love science!!

[@Etropalker]

+1234kalmar ->zooms in further ->looks at electron motion ->this one killed Littlefoots mother

[@MatthewSchellGaming]

+Etropalker Every time someone mentions this movie it reminds me of Ducky. So sad. Damn You!

[@karatefylla]

+Etropalker that's just evil XD

[@Paid2Win]

+Etropalker top kek 10/10 m8

[@ftwgunnerpwns]

+1234kalmar Hsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

[@AvonFoxglove]

Dinofuzz: The cop show about dinosaurs.

[@ProfezorSnayp]

+LoveSeals Starring: Triceracops

[@seanm9306]

Reminds me of Theodorus Rex.

[@deathpony698]

+LoveSeals "fuck the police" - velocirappers

[@Ghastly1]

+LoveSeals "Fluffy Hell-Poodles" are the local biker gang they stars have to take down from the inside.

[@bigdinoguy]

+LoveSeals Spin off of Hot Fuzz, back in the prehistoric times with the characters from Dinosaurs.

[@RuySenpai]

At least in the movie jurassic world they explain that, in fact, without genetic modification to the dinosaurs they would look a lot different.

[@Mallory-Malkovich]

Big fluffy dinosaurs. That would make a very different movie.

[@YouAreMySunshine2]

more damn scary if you ask me. lol

[@Tmalter]

With dark lighting it would damn be perfect

[@sirreality5145]

But it would be pretty cool though.

[@wondrousratofbeigecastle354]

A better one

[@jembea4123]

"Never-ending parade of fluffy dinosaurs" is now my favorite phrase.

[@jembea4123]

I have watched more of the video and "fluffy feathered poodle from hell" is a close runner-up.

[@Brantley923]

In the Jurassic Park movies they explain that they use lizard and frog DNA to fill in the gaps of the Dinosaur genome they're missing. Thus featherless dinosaurs. Am I correct in assuming this?

[@gravel9270]

I know my reply is 7 years late but but Dr. Wu (is that his name?) made a speech about it in Jurassic World.

[@ljmastertroll]

Fluffy Hellpoodles is a good stripper name.

[@ljmastertroll]

MarliesMega Because everywhere is awesome.

[@General12th]

+ljmasternoob ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[@thedubstepaddict3675]

XD

[@gabebaum6527]

"fuzzy poodles from hell" - Hank 2015

[@GSBarlev]

Here researching the scientific accuracy of an SMBC webcomic. All the academic papers were paywalled, but this gave me everything I needed to know! Thank you!

[@AKRex]

@4:13 - Actually we have impressions of t.rex skin and it's close relatives within the tyrannosauridae family. The prints are small and fragmental though, so they do not paint the whole picture of the pattern and size diversity of the actual scales, but we do have them. They also fall within the size range of scales that is shown on hadrosaurs and a carnotaurus (these two preserved a lot more material to show a pattern). There was also a Tarbosaurus mummy discovered a long time ago, but it got destroyed by poachers and we only have a fragment from its throat area. But according to Dr Thomas Carr, the picture can be found in the book in Natural History Museum of Paris and from his observation it showed extensive coverage of scales, with zero sign of feathers. The book is "Mongolian Dinosaurs and Mammals guide", if I am not mistaken. But I havent seent eh photo, therefore no idea how well the photo is done. What we unfortunately lack is more specimens of a more extensive cover of tyrannosaurid skin to work out whether or not it followed a similar pattern and layout as the carnotaurus. And the lack of any papers or testing on the specimens does not help either, but I'm sure it will come in due time, considering how hot this subject is. Regarding the possibility of feathers in t.rex and closest relatives, there is no evidence hinting on feathers at all. While it is a very common pet hypothesis that due to proceratosaurids being their cousin/sister clade (that includes yutyannus by the way) and trying to apply phylogenetic bracketing method to them, their relationship wasn't exactly ancestral, more like two parallel groups within one clade that simply lived at different times. Overall, due to complete lack of evidence of feathers in tyrannosaurids and so far only presence of scales, the burden of proof still lies on the feathered theory, not the other way around. Unless further evidence can reveal otherwise. In other words: "t.rex (and alike) had feathers" = hypothesis, but =/= fact. And science works with data and fossil evidence, which can be tested, analysed, observations replicated and so on. But not with pet hypothesis or speculations (not to say that you are not welcome to have one obviously, its just to make it clear!). Don't forget that not all filmanets are feathers. Many filamentous structures are commonly mistaken for "feathers", while in many cases they do not represent a common trait, but more a secondarily developed integument, or a variation of highly modified scales.

[@guardiangibbs2663]

Finally, someone understands what real science is!

[@ThePpeecc]

Fluffy hell poodles, now we won't only get ripped open by sharp claws, we also will get cuddled to death.

[@kelticsage]

I used to get in arguments with my mother as a child when I always asked why the dinosaur toys and pictures didn't have feathers like they did in my dreams

[@Lemmy_Kilturtle]

+Keltic Sage Haha I don't know why but I think this is great.

[@Darticus42]

+Keltic Sage Haha thats great. You knew basic evolutionary progression even before you even knew what an organism is made of. CLEVER -GIRL- BOY

[@SevenUnwokenDreams]

Sorcery!

[@cuckoophendula8211]

+Keltic Sage Just out of curiosity, what year was it when these experiences occurred?

[@nickopeters]

Awesome--!

[@Sunhawk7ajj]

I demand a picture of fluffy hell poodles. You put it in my head!!!!!!!

[@Skippa1986]

The "velociraptors" from Jurassic Park were so named because it sounds more badass and simpler than deinonychus, the species they were actually inspired by.

[@MadnerKami]

+Skippa1986 Actually, given their size, they were inspired by Utahraptors. Simple rule of thumb as per how large they were: Velos bite your knees, Deinos bite your arse, Utahs bite your head.

[@NarayanAT]

+Skippa1986 I thought they were supposed to be Utahraptors, but now I know that I am wrong! Thanks for the clarification. -.-

[@TheSH1N1GAM1]

+MadnerKami Utahraptors were recognized as a species after the movie was already in production. Spielberg just made the velociraptors bigger as dramatic license. Jurassic Park essentially invented a dinosaur that ended up being real. Utahraptor was named in June of 1993, Jurassic Park was released in theaters in June of 1993.

[@MadnerKami]

TheSH1N1GAM1 Heh, nice. Wasn't aware of that, thanks.

[@connorshea9085]

+TheSH1N1GAM1 Why wouldn't they name it, like, Parkraptor or Spielbergraptor or something? That would've been so cool

[@bulman07]

Jurassic World had a line about dinofuzz being absent, saying that they were genetically engineered to be the scary megalizards people expect :)

[@YesicaAguirreYesiDellaCripta]

First, everyone dishes on Jurassic World on the look of the dinos, but they said it in the movie that they made them as the ppl thought they were, not as they REALLY looked like. Also, dinofuzz? Best.Word.Ever. Love the SciShow, keep up the awesome work ;)

[@clu52]

This is the only channel with comments that relate to the video. (Not including this comment though 😏)

[@shruggzdastr8-facedclown]

I came for the promised feathery dinosaurs but stayed for the mention of "fluffy hell poodles"!

[@bigboss311092]

What if Godzilla also had feathers ? xD

[@cursebr2937]

What if it doesn’t exist

[@bigboss311092]

@@cursebr2937 Bold idea but ok.

[@echoridley9118]

Very specialized feathers such as the feathers found on most adult modern birds work more to cool down the animal rather than keep it warm - which is why cold birds fluff up.

[@pistonpkm]

I've seen a chicken documentary where it was mentioned that chickens are the closest relatives of tyranossaurus rex alive today. Is that true?! Regardless, if you take a close look at birds,it feels like travelling back to prehistoric times.

[@TasX]

+Yin Tsang I can just imagine a chicken movie quote going "Times have turned, what we once used to prey on now hunts us down"

[@ShinyGoldBacon]

+Yin Tsang I'm pretty sure it's true. Next time you eat chicken, remember that this is a t-rex relative. You are eating a dinosaur! >:D

[@TasX]

ShinyGoldBacon not really, it's like saying that we are homo habilis

[@TJ52359]

+Radi Bear (Radioactive TeddyBear) hey! who you calling Homo, pal? and don't you be looking at my Habilis.

[@ShinyGoldBacon]

Radi Bear Psshhh, don't ruin my fantasy. I eat dinosaurs!

[@Xenu]

Don't we already have fossilized impressions of t-rex scales, though? - Good episode.

[@Halfswift]

early bird

[@math6844]

I GET IT

[@5raptorboy1]

+Randy Butternubs But did you get the worm

[@jacklonghearse9821]

genius

[@zt2ean]

+Halfswift Aurornis?

[@thedubstepaddict3675]

confuciosornis

[@MasterTMO]

My new phrase of the day: "Fluffy hell poodles" Props for that!

[@skykid]

As much as I wish the raptors had feathers in JP/JW, the distinction has already been made by the people in the movie that they're not genetically exact velociraptors, like every other species in the movie, they're imperfectly cloned, and at times genetically engineered. Of course this is a retcon since in the original they were just made that way to look more scary. They're also bigger than real velociraptors were.

[@connorshea9085]

+skykid I like the idea that the people at Jurassic World knew exactly what they were doing and wanted to make velociraptors that looked like how people thought they would look.

[@OkamiG15]

Amphibian DNA. They used it to "fill in the gaps," and it's not a stretch that they filled the gaps responsible for feather production. After all, they did accidentally insert the genes for sex reassignment, so it probably wasn't perfect science back then (in universe of course).

[@TJ52359]

+skykid to be fair around the time the first Jurassic Park film came out, they discovered a Raptor sub species, the UtahRaptor, (wonder where they found it?) that matched up size, and 'weaponry' with the film's Raptors, so they were correct by accident.as noted World, threw in the line about designing them to match public expectations, rather than accuracy, which is mostly cover for the explosion of Dino-knowledge that came out between the Book and the present.

[@iota-09]

+skykid i actually think they would look more scary if they did have colorful feathers made to look aggressive, but that's probably just a monster hunter vibe.

[@jrubal1462]

+Tim Janssen When I heard the line about "matching public expectations" I said to my group, "That's their way of saying, 'Back off...we know... but B.D. Wong's not putting feathers on dinosaurs!' " I'm not usually a movie-talker, but we were at the drive-in.

[@The1Helleri]

I have rode a few Elephants at county fairs. They have both ground and guard hair (fur). It's not very noticeable unless your up close because of how short and translucent it is. But it is there.

[@ldekker97]

Fluffy Hell Poodles. Great name for a band.

[@djatawesome2572]

The reason why the Jurassic Park dinosaurs called a VelociRaptor instead of a Deinonychus which is what it's supposed to be, is because at the Time Michael Crichton was writing Jurassic Park deinonychus was newly discovered and classified as a velociraptor deinonychus when Jurassic Park the movie came out it was too late to change the name and deinonychus had become its own species which is how it's classified today. Plus they had foreign animals DNA integrated which could have completely unknown effects like them breeding.

[@pigeonlarvamagoo8572]

IS scishow not going to explain how the real velociraptor was like the size of a chicken to midsize dog and Spielberg named Deinonychus velociraptor because the name is scarier, and that the scientific community basically bitched out and let him rename it?

[@james4thedoctor482]

The Velociraptor that is depicted in the Jurassic Park franchise is actually a Utahraptor (minus the feathers). Velociraptor was about the size of a medium-sized dog, about waist height.

[@avecas]

If only Jurassic World had put feathers on their dinosaurs we could avoid most of the debate with stubborn fans... like JW you had *one job* which was to be a movie that everyone was going to see and use this to present dinosaurs accurately to the masses (as Jurassic park did at the time) hnnh

[@avecas]

Madalin Grama well you can't blame jurassic park; it actually was the most amazingly accurate dinosaur movie ever at the time

[@avecas]

Madalin Grama deinonychus was classified as a velociraptor species at the time. The feathers thing was more towards jurassic park III I'm not arguing they're at all accurate mind you

[@avecas]

Madalin Grama point taken. The CGI I think just didn't have the practical effects to back it up; in jurassic park seeing tangible objects made the CGI look better, plus the CGI was never super exposed like in JW.

[@avecas]

Madalin Grama movie...quality...DEGRADING

[@mikethedinoman8970]

+Benjamin Casillas Well, to be honest we only know for SURE that JW misrepresented Velociraptor and Gallimimus

[@TJ52359]

Probably been said in 520 + comments, but "Fluffy Hell Poodles" is a great name for a Band

[@Moscato_Moscato]

Clever Bird....

[@ChesuMori]

DINOFUZZ?? That is amazing. Also, it makes me want a dinosaur police procedural.

[@jabronick]

Scrolling through the comments to find butthurt people who think feathered dinosaurs are "uncool".

[@daniellat2151]

I think they are cooler feathered. It makes more sense too

[@Tmalter]

@@daniellat2151 agreed

[@AxionZetaOne]

Every time someone mentions feathered raptors, my mind goes immediately to _Manly Guys Doing Manly Things_ as that's the first place I saw an artist's impressions of feathered raptors. Wok Wok Woo~!

[@TheRevolucas]

I'm tired of lizard dinosaur cliche in games and movies. I want to see more 'true' dinosaurs.

[@thegallus--3556]

Agreed.

[@valiapavlou]

Look on youtube for [Saurian Kickstarter Trailer] Its developers worked with real life paleontologists and made the dinos more accurate than we would ever know! Game is not released yet, for more updates check its Facebook page!

[@stephaniehight2771]

You mention that the reason T-Rex may not have had feathers is because of its large size, but a T-Rex hatchling would have been much smaller than a modern baby elephant, and would probably have needed a feathery covering.

[@HowitzerBug]

Somehow the idea of feathered dinosaurs just makes them even more awesome! :D

[@azsxdcfvgbhnjmhn]

And yet even after discoveries like archaeopteryx some people still deny evolution and ask for a missing link

[@robthehitmanrude]

No jean jacket to distract this time...

[@piggyoinkoink6352]

I wish Jurassic World had feathered their raptors. It would have been so cool seeing a quartet of giant killer roadrunners sprinting alongside Chris Pratt...

[@vonpupees]

After telling that some colours don't last and others do why would we assume that the dinos just happened to be the colours that we know last?

[@Sharkasaurusemperor1]

Because birds and crocodile usually have very simple coloration and we are only assuming and MIGHT be wrong but the evidence and morphology of feathers supports our current thinking

[@NotaWalrus1]

+vonpupees No, we know that they had the colors that we know last, and have little idea regarding other colors

[@VoidUnderTheSun]

They just happen to know the colours of two birds. I'm sure they have more fossils with feathers that they don't know what colour they were… Sounds that way to me at least..

[@docterfantazmo]

The only problem with micro-structures (such as those that determine colour) is that they're extremely susceptible to taphonomic processes so although the colours are still likely to be those mentioned here, it isn't a sure thing... which is kinda true for most things fossil related I suppose. The stuff I've studied suggests proto-feathers (such as dino-fuzz) were likely used to enable theropods to warm up quicker during the early hours of the morning and to stay warm later at night, given them an advantage over their prey/predators, not to say they weren't used for others things of course.

[@tinymangoes]

I like Squidward

[@ron2092]

how is that relates to this video

[@italianboi1390]

well my name es jose!

[@TasX]

WATCH OUT! IT'S SQUIDASAURUS REX!!!!!

[@General12th]

+WatchingOctopus Squidward is the best dinosaur.

[@CreatorsHubCreates]

This man is a genius

[@robbielosee]

I for one can't wait to see a dinosaur movie featuring Big Bird.

[@TheTigero]

2:55 You're not bursting anyone's bubble, Jurassic World clearly explains that the raptors were genetically modified to be scarier and with no feathers... :)

[@landklaas]

"Fluffy Hell Poodle" Is my word of the day XP

[@Tamaki742]

So velociraptor are pretty much carnivorous, oversized macaws.

[@megasupreme9985]

more like oversized eagles

[@megasupreme9985]

don't make it sound idiotic

[@Tamaki742]

Megasupream But if they're colorful, they're probably macaws, or birds in the parrot family. Or peacocks. Or bird of paradise.

[@megasupreme9985]

Tamaki742 they're predators.

[@Tamaki742]

Megasupream American Kestrel then.

[@PapaFiki]

I guess this brings a new meaning to "its so fluffy I'm gonna die" (you know from despicable me).

[@Rottensteam]

So T-rex was fabulous?!

[@General12th]

+Rottensteam Hey, you don't need to be pretty to be a bloodthirsty murderer (or scavenger, as the case may be).

[@killerbee2562]

+Rottensteam At the very least they had down when they were hachlings.

[@karlhans6678]

we dont know.

[@DracarmenWinterspring]

"A neverending parade of fluffy dinosaurs." Well, I know what I'll be counting instead of sheep tonight.

[@Axrotex]

Huh? What about the spinosaurids? Did they have feathers too?

[@arachnophilia427]

aquatic birds today have feathers, so... maybe.

[@MadnerKami]

+Axrotex Since Spinosaurids are also Theropods, the answer is: Quite likely yes.

[@ody6189]

+MadnerKami Not necessarily.. There are plenty of theropod dinosaurs with evidence of scaley skin and zero evidence of feathers, so there are probably still plenty of theropods that are scaley.. Just not T. rex or Velociraptor, which are everyone's favorites thanks to Jurassic Park.. Jurassic Park just has a habbit of picking the ones that end up being fluffy for some reason. Compsognathus was fluffy, Pteranodon was fluffy, even the Gallimimus was fluffy, just about the only JP carnivores that we've yet to find any evidence for fluff on are Dilophosaurus and Spinosaurus.. Which we all know by now are both still completely inaccurate in those films..

[@marcustulliuscicero5443]

+Sophie Freeman The question is if those scales are homologous to reptilian scales or if they are modified feathers. For instance, the scutes you find at i.e. the feet of ostriches aren't scales, but modified feathers.

[@ody6189]

Huh?.. Feathers are modified scales in the first place, so are you saying that they were scales that became feathers and became scales again?..

[@aliblis2347]

*Skin impression of T- rex :* *Scaly (Non-featherd)* *Artists: We can draw pictures of T-rex covered in feathers* *Tyrannosaurus rex: Wtf*

[@Alice-gr1kb]

Al Iblis there’s some scales but not everywhere

[@johnsheehan5109]

Too bad old Kent Bovine can't watch this video with a dollop of comprehension.

[@killerbee2562]

There is some thought that dinosaurs like Velociraptor and it's relatives are secondary flightless, ie that they evolved from a dinosaur that could fly, but they lost the ability to fly. Similar to a ostrich.

[@jivenesspie]

suddenly I imagined a ballet of feathery dinosaurs doing spins, and jumps and leaps all the while showcasing their beautiful plumage.

[@giangthanhdat8314]

Me: This video is about fluffy dinosaurs My nephew: T-Rex has feathers?

[@indoraptor3405]

Tell your nephew they don't

[@m8e]

That "fluffy feathered poodle from hell" must be Mephistopheles.

[@JamesHarshaw]

@SciShow "fluffy hell poodle" made my week.

[@pharinyxtheplant667]

If you think you'd be too busy laughing at a feathered dinosaur to run, imagine being chased by a Cassowary. They look goofy as fuck, but they will tear you shit up, and I highly doubt you wouldn't run. It even has a beak instead of a mouth full of giant teeth, so it looks even less threatening than a dinosaur.

[@aklaft]

In that popular movie franchise you mentioned they acknowledged the problem by saying they engineered the dinosaurs to look cooler

[@jaysilverheals4445]

they way I finally got it through my head about them having feathers is sometimes its hard to tell what is feathers or not. Penguins are actually covered in feathers but few would guess it but they cant fly. Trex did not fly but the chicks may have started out with fuzz feathers. The velociraptors could have glided without actually flying around similar to modern roadrunner. Note that with birds today with their feathers? they dont care if its 20 below zero or 100 degrees. I think humans would be better off if we had feathers. gets cold or hot? we die on the spot if we were naked.

[@richardblazer8070]

Well given thay we evolved in the savanna and are moslty hairless to have sweat glands, having feather-like filaments would lead to overheating

[@godzilloid]

Ever seen a cassowary? A 7 ft tall Australian bird. It has a bony crest and a disemboweling claw on each foot. Even dogs avoid it. Sounds like a velociraptor to me.

[@dariensessions653]

i have ONE suggestion for this amazing youtube channel...MORE PICTURES! there are several times where you guys are explaining stuff and im like thats awesome! but...whats it look like? For instance, it wouldve been cool if we had a fuzzy poodle from hell in a picture, sounds adorable :D but other than that best thing to happen to youtube, keep doing you and ill keep watching it.

[@valiapavlou]

All theropods (carnivores) had feathers, and on their feet they did not only have scales, but also naked skin like on ostriches. Herbivores were all scaly. Although i do not mean lizards, i mean cows that are not mammals... There is an exception, for ornithomimids and omnivores, yes they had feathers. IN CONCLUSION, whatever walks on 2 legs (ONLY) has feathers on its forelimbs. (Except of the Suchomimus and Spinosaurus family)

[@nathanyoung3483]

3:50 I've never heard anything saying big animals don't need fur to keep warm. Where can I find more on that?

[@KathyTrithardt]

"Fluffy poodles from hell" - wonderful.

[@dav3Dlegend]

I think "dinofuzz" is my new favourite word.

[@kwetsbarevrijheid2720]

Ty for posting this vid on the evening I watched the new Jurassic Park!

[@myrobotfish]

"Fluffy feathered poodle from hell" aka every Goosebumps commercial scheme lol

[@stoppi89]

So, where can I buy a Fluffy feathered poodle from hell as a pet?

[@ErnestJay88]

2:24 How about dinosaur with Blue and Black feathers ? is there any dinosaur denied it and call it White and Gold dinosaur ?

[@Dan-B]

Thanks Hank, now I'm going to be procrastinating on the thought of police Dinosaurs...

[@ANDELE3025]

Why does 2-5cm big spikes with smaller spikes on em somehow = Fluffy hell poodles? Also i really dont like it when people still imply that all Tyrannosaurus had feathers if we still have not found imprints in the minerals/sediment/rocks around the fossils (which are all quite rare and geographically limited to east Africa and South & East Asia).

[@Chizbolt]

Would probably have helped Jurassic Park if they hadn't used Deinonychus for their velociraptors.

[@TheSpinkels]

Dinofuzz. Sounds like a pre-historic cop show.

[@sleepershark8816]

Thank you for not letting me down Scishow, great job!

[@levi12howell]

I think it needs to be said that I love every one of your videos and often forget to click the like button

[@AtOutoftheBlue]

"Fluffy hell poodles" is now my favorite word

[@Brandyalla]

I must have a Tshirt with a picture of a feathered raptor and the legend "Fluffy Hell-Poodles". Somebody make that shirt!

[@matthewpinter9578]

Scishow, I think the image that you show at 1:20 is not of archaeopteryx but of Microraptor.

[@XxRAPTORxX23]

For the records i wanted to tell, the first bird in Late Mesozoic Era was Aurornis xui not Archaeopteryx. Btw "the first bird" is thought to be Protoaves (first bird) in Triassic Era. Even the theropods are not evolved yet! Yeah i know, it's mind blowing. Good video tho.

[@sterlingodeaghaidh5086]

I just love the term "Fluffy Hell Poodle"just makes me laugh.

[@Bootyyyshaker-fy3gn]

i cant be the only one that wants a fuzzy hell poodle now right?

[@AlexLusth]

wow...that color thing was so freaking cool!

[@jordansmithson9602]

"Fluffy Hell poodle"..... my new catch phrase.

[@BigAl2-u7e]

Did Dinosaurs have feathers Me: Yes

[@sidneyvanderlaan6598]

you should do a video on how paleontologist know how certain dinosaurs are related to each other

[@lelanddyer9461]

Dinofuzz just made my day.

[@nmlssrdshrt1701]

"Fluffy feathered poodle from hell" - Hank Green, 2015

[@5iwot5]

"fluffy hell poodles" ... Got it! thanks!

[@MagnetoNova]

Can we just point out that there are no Velociraptors in Jurassic Park? The Raptors are modelled after Dienonychus.

[@NickK1221]

"Fluffy Hell Poodles." I died! XD

[@yttis3257]

He looks and sounds like he could be John Greens brother. Oh, he is.