I never really questioned the out of Africa theory until it became a mortal sin to question it.
@valdivia1234567Ай бұрын
Or the "very real" possibility that Cleopatra was black lol.
@JAC4000Ай бұрын
@@valdivia1234567first civilizations were in Africa and the Middle East
@dawseyboy1Ай бұрын
@@JAC4000 this is correct
@versioncity1Ай бұрын
Which religious group are you from?
@Lav9944Ай бұрын
@@JAC4000Africa has never had a true civilisation! Waring Tribes aren't civilised.
@busgreaserАй бұрын
Proud to be white and English. Just loving it.
@northernlights8126Ай бұрын
💯🏴🇬🇧
@Parrotgirl-tattooАй бұрын
It's sad what's happening to your nation.
@rickybobbysbrokenarm29 күн бұрын
Proud to be mentally ill? There is no such thing as whiteness or blackness or any of it. Are you the same as a Russian? Are you the same people as a Romanian? I mean you have the same skin color, so if I see a Roma I might as well think of you and them as the same?
@stuartmacinnes899228 күн бұрын
@busgreaser Absolutely yes it's great .
@JayNichols-p2s19 күн бұрын
Ditto
@pavlovssheep5548Ай бұрын
every thing we are officially told is a lie
@williamtell6750Ай бұрын
A good heuristical rule.
@chrisdonishАй бұрын
Only the things you don't want to believe are lies, how convenient for you.
@sirrathersplendid4825Ай бұрын
It’s not a lie, it’s a theory, a current ‘best guess’. Problem is that most people don’t understand how science works, in which case it becomes dogma.
@evolassunglasses4673Ай бұрын
We live under "The Empire of Lies".
@michellemurphy895Ай бұрын
@@sirrathersplendid4825Whether a theory or a lie is irrelevant. It's not that people do not understand how science works. These theories or lies are not an accident. These theories are given weight, by the so called 'expert class', if people start questioning the theory or lie, they are admonished, belittled and called conspiracy theorists. The reason for this is simple. So, the theory only becomes dogma, once enough funding and scientific journals are thrown behind these lies. All of this is very obvious once you see the why. However, then you will be called fringe, crazy, bigot etc.
@rickjensen2717Ай бұрын
'Out of Africa' was regarded as uncertain at best when I was studying the subject at uni 40+ years ago. Also peoples who did travel from Africa at that time were certainly not Bantu.
@Daisyworld743Ай бұрын
When the Bantu moved into South Africa, previously unpopulated, they de-evolved.
@danielburger1775Ай бұрын
@Daisyworld743 The Bantu only entered southern Africa in the last few hundred years. After reproducing at a much higher rate than the people who were there before them, they became the majority, and then they became "the indigenous people". A lesson to all.
@Flyingscotsman66Ай бұрын
Absolutely
@chrisdonishАй бұрын
No one said they were bantu. Why would you assume that?
@johnbrereton5229Ай бұрын
Weren't the indigenous people of South Africa the Khoi -San who now only account for 1% of the population ?
@baggie_woodmanАй бұрын
Similar to the Windrush generation came here to rebuild Britian nonsense. It's patronising to all involved. It's like the "everyone's a winner" at the egg and spoon race at your kids school sports day.
@michaelscales5996Ай бұрын
I am afraid, in my opinion,very,very few came to the UK to roll their sleeves up and work hard. The Windrush was comprised mainly of hundreds of unemployed because of laziness or incompetence on their part, or those wishing to avoid large debts they owed,often to bookmakers.
@markadams738Ай бұрын
@@baggie_woodman Biggest ship in the world . Same as the Dublin GPO.😌
@adenwellsmith6908Ай бұрын
THey came here because a group of civil servants running London Transport and the NHS had the same mentality as plantation owners in the deep south of america. Who will do shite jobs on low pay?
@JC-ee6pcАй бұрын
@@michaelscales5996 Interesting to see in the original photos of their arrival here, not a few of them were covering their faces.
@sillypuppy5940Ай бұрын
What's strange is that if your house is destroyed by flood, fire, or some other disaster, you are not obliged to offer the builders who come to rebuild it a free home and free money afterwards. Although they might get a bit uppity if you don't offer them a rich tea biscuit with their tea.
@harrypalmer7169Ай бұрын
I have never bought into the Out of Africa theory, it always seemed to have more holes than Swiss Cheese.
@clownofthetimes6727Ай бұрын
Name one of these holes then.
@bushwhackeddos.2703Ай бұрын
@@clownofthetimes6727 Africa
@iandavidvillaloboswong5180Ай бұрын
@@clownofthetimes6727 How do you cross the Sahara without clothes when europeans needed ships avoid it?
@MrGloop1234Ай бұрын
@@clownofthetimes6727watch the video
@longsleevethong1457Ай бұрын
@@clownofthetimes6727gene studies.
@HolgerDanskeАй бұрын
I remember reading many years ago an article that said few serious scientists believed the 'Out of Africa' theory. The only reason that they embraced and promoted it was because the scientific community felt sorry that so few significant things actually came from or originated in Africa, and they felt that this might boost their self-esteem.
@roringusanda2837Ай бұрын
It was also politically motivated, they wanted permission to do digs there, and this sort of thing let them persuade the officials to let them.
@barryfoster453Ай бұрын
NOTHING good has come out of Africa.
@suewood8538Ай бұрын
Well that has come back to bite the world on the bum.
@barryfoster453Ай бұрын
NOTHING good has ever come out of Africa.
@mjones4083Ай бұрын
@@suewood8538 A very big bite at that .
@ChrisPbikerАй бұрын
Human DEVOLUTION started in Africa and is progressing very well!
@HaleyChain-vw8rrАй бұрын
Should we leave evolution to humans .
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
@HaleyChain-vw8rr Are you still sweeping on this channel, sweetie? 🤣
@DavidBritton-nl1wvАй бұрын
@HaleyChain-vw8rr WTF is that supposed to mean?
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
@@DavidBritton-nl1wv It means that he's not human...
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
@@DavidBritton-nl1wv It means that he's not one of them...
@barryfoster453Ай бұрын
The theory came up a year ago that we almost certainly originated from Northern Europe...when Britain was connected to the continent, and it was postulated that it could actually have been right here. Imagine that - humans originating from what is now England. I want to see the BBC report that so much.
@maisondusuaveАй бұрын
Or Wales!
@barryfoster453Ай бұрын
@@maisondusuave Yes, possibly. I think Scotland was warmer then, too. It would have had to be a site conducive to foster good conditions - vegetation, wild animals, water.
@396-m7eАй бұрын
Ha Ha Ha
@tysolbohan6446Ай бұрын
So you're confusing a few things they were talking about an completely another primate not directly related to us. We come from Heisenbergensus which did come from Africa. This isn't to deny Eurasians mixing with non Africans but that came after our core DNA is shared between the earliest migrants out of Africa hence we aren't sub species
@barryfoster453Ай бұрын
@@tysolbohan6446 No, that was half a million years ago. The study I read was relating to the actual ORIGIN. In other words, from before 600,000 years ago. Heidelbergensis is FROM Homo Erectus. Where did Homo Erectus come from? When we start saying that we KNOW things, we are in very murky waters, believe me. My field is climate science, and there are papers coming out saying that we even have the whole idea of greenhouse gases completely and utterly wrong - that we're not just up the wrong tree, but we shouldn't even be barking. If it turns out true, then we have a major arm of science fantastically incorrect.
@_FML_Ай бұрын
"O-o-A" has never made sense to me, even from a modern scientific standpoint...If we all supposedly originated from the same set of ancestors, wouldn't we all have the same original archaic genes...?
@JP-lk2qsАй бұрын
Doesn’t fit in with woke strategy
@clownofthetimes6727Ай бұрын
@@JP-lk2qs Your words dont fit in either when you consider this is all decades if not centuries older than "woke". Are you really so stupid that you are prepared to accept obvious lies to put across a false idealogy? There is no need to answer.
@hiddentruth8741Ай бұрын
Politicians say we’re all the same but how that could be when present day sub Saharan Africans trace up 19% of their ancestry from an extinct archaic hominid species (homo erectus or homo habilis) that is NOT found in the DNA of present day Asians or Caucasians
@tysolbohan6446Ай бұрын
No you idiot because you can leave Africa and then merge with different types of hominids this is such a stupid argument
@sroth2021Ай бұрын
We obviously share a common ancestor somewhere down the line. I mean we share a common ancestor with chimps even further back down the line.
@ruledtrendy5066Ай бұрын
I've tried looking into this and asked questions about it online. Only to be met with nothing but outright hostility from a certain demographic
@somebloke13Ай бұрын
And their woke enablers...
@versioncity1Ай бұрын
Maybe because it's not really regarded with any seriousness within academic circles.....
@RossBirch-c4eАй бұрын
shut it down
@ruledtrendy5066Ай бұрын
@@versioncity1 real academics don't respond with vitriol when asked questions about a hypothesis. That's the domain of activists who can't stand people holding views that aren't completely aligned with their own
@versioncity1Ай бұрын
@@ruledtrendy5066 then maybe simply ask academics whose field this is rather than making vacuous statements on you tube.
@paulcooper7408Ай бұрын
Based on how a lot of black people behave, I wouldn't be surprised if they were an entirely different species.
@MrVorpalswordАй бұрын
well black people, japanese, maori, chinese, european and everybody else's race can mate with each other to produce fertile young, so, as that is one definition of being in the same species ..... we are all the same species.
@MrVorpalswordАй бұрын
@@Spartiate6470Don't be a complete idiot, I have friends from lost of different races and I have also had girlfriends from different races - I have slept with them, I'm telling you, even if you cannot, we are the same in many ways. Who is this 'they' with this one screwdriver or whatever it was, the Japanese, the Inca, the European, the Indian, the African, are you completely bonkers?
@hughjasse3375Ай бұрын
@@MrVorpalswordSub species. Hence the Neanderthal and Denisovan gene content in Caucasians and Asians. Blue eyes and red hair are Neanderthal alleles. Any modern human carrying those traits is carrying Neanderthal genes. In the same way a LiLiger can appear visually identical to a lion, and can interbreed, but in fact carries genes and a genetic history of a different species (panthera tigris).
@imankhandaker6103Ай бұрын
Not all black people behave the same. You would know - if you knew knew two.
@imankhandaker6103Ай бұрын
@@edmondwhite6683Aristotle? ROFLMAO.
@sebastianguerre6868Ай бұрын
I think one mistake you made Simon is to say that gorillas and chimpanzees are the ancestors of humans which isn't true, however it seems likely that chimpanzees, gorillas and humans all have a common ancestor.
@jmlaw8888Ай бұрын
Yes it is a very careless and common mistake people make. Its like calling a brother or cousin your 'ancestor'. Its a complete misuse of the term.
@kevinparker461Ай бұрын
We are apes ...
@DrDavidWilson_1xАй бұрын
You are correct.
@rossini5527 күн бұрын
Yes. Thank you for pointing out that glaring error. I see a lot of posts here confusing "evolved or descended from" and "sharing a common ancestor with". Some people just cannot get that concept.
@peterlatham8165Ай бұрын
Our origin may well remain a mystery. Never mind: it gives the chip-on-shoulder inadequates something to gripe about.
@KemetledAfricaАй бұрын
West Africans have the greatest genetic diversity
@Porkypies6mАй бұрын
no it gives reasoning to why peoples have since the beginning remained in their own grewps
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
@@KemetledAfrica Are you still sweeping on this channel, sweetie? 🥱
@smoathАй бұрын
@@KemetledAfricayou are a joke
@alanhargreaves-thevoiceofr2361Ай бұрын
Genetic engineering perhaps... ?? ( for them )
@rationalbacon5872Ай бұрын
Obviously they did not. The out of africa fairytale is how we baby those who cannot compete. Like we use santa and the tooth fairy
@dragonofhatefulretribution9041Ай бұрын
@@rationalbacon5872 Exactly. “Well…put it this way; without you: we wouldn’t be here!” 👀
@John-g1xАй бұрын
Yes it was such an esteem booster for them
@davelowe1977Ай бұрын
This is gold. You're that kid in the emperor's new clothes story.
@RillUKАй бұрын
It was created to help us accept our ethnic replacement in our homelands.
@HaleyChain-vw8rrАй бұрын
Out of africa relies on evidence, your theory supremacist hogwash.
@jumpfortyfour9965Ай бұрын
africa is still in the stone age [ the white man is on the moon ]
@WorldsgonebonkersАй бұрын
Exactly! No more to be said. 😂
@HaleyChain-vw8rrАй бұрын
Lol, but your ignorance is profoundly primeval
@ItisOKtobewhiteАй бұрын
They still mock their shit with a stick.
@Flyingscotsman66Ай бұрын
How is it?
@chrisdonishАй бұрын
Last time I checked no one lives on the moon.
@michellewerries7433Ай бұрын
This has been known for some time, but is passed over and denied because...
@laurasteif86Ай бұрын
Well... because feelings.
@barkmakerАй бұрын
@@laurasteif86 and exploitation thereof. Yup.
@mariemiller8740Ай бұрын
Because it's CRAP! We never all came from Africa
@Porkypies6mАй бұрын
so as to force mc onto peoples thus weakening their societies
@distantthunder12ck55Ай бұрын
Because narrative.
@careytitan9097Ай бұрын
Thank you Simon, I have never believed the out of Africa theory, it is just a 'theory' after all. Common sense tells us otherwise, whose civilizations are more advanced and whose are not, we came from different ancestors, who later mixed, as they do today.
@JJRM8Ай бұрын
Nonsense.
@stevendavis2122Ай бұрын
@@JJRM8You’ve been watching too much David Attenborough.
@Hereward47Ай бұрын
@@JJRM8ahh Jack does this unsettle your liberal sensibilities
@JJRM8Ай бұрын
@stevendavis2122 You don't understand the study. If it's correct.
@willemventer3935Ай бұрын
Sorry but one of the oldest civilisation was on the Nile, in Africa. 😊🎉🎉😮
@Jackie-ji2sj23 күн бұрын
Looking at Africa today, I have never believed this nonsense that we began in Africa.
@stufen11Ай бұрын
Never did believe the old 'out of Africa' routine. Load of old tosh.
@AnthonyMcCaul-c9gАй бұрын
@@stufen11 Do tell us your theory "Professor"😜
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
@@AnthonyMcCaul-c9g Ask your oola booga friends in Wakanda! 🤣
@MagnanimousEntropyАй бұрын
Indeed. The idea that we came from that awful place is as laughable as it is disgusting.
@AnthonyMcCaul-c9gАй бұрын
@@MagnanimousEntropy Your bigoted and ignorant comment has been reported. Gobshite!
@ClactonCuuNАй бұрын
White Europeans evolved from primates, chimps, gorillas 🦍 etc. Make it make sense
@raijinenel3116Ай бұрын
You can even see political ideology infecting the most pure of professions. Famous BBC host and part time archaeologist, Alice Roberts has openly expressed her refusal to accept evidence that debunks OoA. And has expressed her views on twitter indicating to her holding radical left wing stances.
@rule3036Ай бұрын
Roberts is another good example of Universities and the BBC lefty- woke brainwashing apparatus in action, I used to think she was quite tasty, until she started sneaking lefty propaganda into her commentary and articles. Nothing uglier than the arrogant left.
@kenwright5144Ай бұрын
Dead giveaway. She dyes her hair pink.
@robm8809Ай бұрын
She knows who butters her bread.
@raijinenel3116Ай бұрын
@robm8809 would be very interesting to see what she thinks of the Israel Palestine conflict.
@somebloke13Ай бұрын
@@raijinenel3116You don't need to know, you can already predict it with uncanny accuracy...
@carolramsey6287Ай бұрын
Yesterday I saw a video about the brain of a squid which is donut shaped. Apparently when the mollusc is developing from the egg the mouthparts develop first and rhe alimentary tract grows through the hole in the brain and onward toward the anus which develops last. This was said to be common to invertebrates whereas in the vertebrates the asshole develops first and grows toward the mouth bypassing the brain entirely. This would explain a lot about the human condition in general and politicians in particular, and may even account for David Lammy and Diane Abbot
@gardamusАй бұрын
Ho ho ho
@S.M.E.A.CАй бұрын
Didn't expect to read about a Squids Taint today. Thank you.
@stufen11Ай бұрын
😂🤣🤣
@elisekuby2009Ай бұрын
Sort of like a Trilobite?? Kind of makes sense.
@richardjamesclemo6235Ай бұрын
So they have a Torus has a brain? No wonder they’re smart.
@Ambander-p3xАй бұрын
Watch Robert Sepehr "Out of Afrika debunked" His documentary has even interviews of Christopher Stringer, the creator of the Out of Afrika theory himself admitting that further evidence in past couple decades has proven the old theory false, and that different human rayces are in fact different species that evoIved separately in their own corners of the worId.
@CheeseOfMastersАй бұрын
How can different species interbreed and produce fertile offspring?
@ryanjones7921Ай бұрын
I concur,, the term species in the monologue may be mis used as species scientifically cannot interbreed,, doesn’t negate the obvious differences between the races though
@Ambander-p3xАй бұрын
@@CheeseOfMasters Because different humanoid species can. How come people like you who ask this question always conveniently ignore the fact that we Europeans have an amount of NeanderthaI DNA from interbreeding with them, a separate, non-human species? That case alone proves its possible.
@Ambander-p3xАй бұрын
@@ryanjones7921 Wrong. NeanderthaI are a completely different species, yet interbred with our ancestors, and that is why we have some NeanderthaI DNA. This means it is entirely possible. You are being manipulated, and not even thinking for yourseIf when they do it.
@CheeseOfMastersАй бұрын
@Ambander-p3x Well the definition of species is very wishy washy then. After thinking about it I remembered that Wolfdogs are also fertile mostly, but donkeys and horses aren't, chicken and turkeys aren't and lions and tigers aren't either. Dogs are also very young so I read up on wolf and coyote hybrids and those were actually fertile as well, so I guess the term species or subspecies is still on the table.
@disgruntledofsw6221Ай бұрын
A Chinese friend of mine said that as a child he was taught to believe that those of sub Saharan ancestry are a form of sub species.
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
They call it the evil continent too...
@tysolbohan6446Ай бұрын
That's why I don't trust a single thing the Chinese man they are liars through and through it's a culture of hiding and lying you expect me to buy there shit show me Indepedent data from a non politically motivated university
@tishie42Ай бұрын
So taught correct then? 😂
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
You should ask them how they call Africa in Chinese... I wrote it but my comment disappeared without traces... This is very interesting! 🤬
@disgruntledofsw6221Ай бұрын
@@O-p8w3r “One of Cantonese words for “them” is Kak Gwei, which translates as Sub-Species or “animal-man”.
@DovestonedipperАй бұрын
Heresy against Doctrine could well be on Lord Protector Starmers new crimes list. However you always present the evidence to back your information up. I salute you Sir.
@questionade4229Ай бұрын
Out of Africa theory was disowned years ago. This is nothing new
@TrevorMelbourne-ef1inАй бұрын
Good morning, Uncle Simon. Moving ever closer to 250,000 subscribers! ✌️
@RobdeKlerk-qg6lcАй бұрын
Je becomes rich
@colinharbinson5510Ай бұрын
@@RobdeKlerk-qg6lcP 🐀
@AnthonyMcCaul-c9gАй бұрын
One of the best channels on KZbin to satisfy the conformational bias of Webb's devotees! 🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑😜
@Johnny-sj9sjАй бұрын
@@RobdeKlerk-qg6lc. Please, if you can, convert your comment into comprehensible English and resubmit. thank you.
@Johnny-sj9sjАй бұрын
@@AnthonyMcCaul-c9g Hello Bob! Or is it space girl? It's difficult to tell with you stealthy rascals.
@alexbowman7582Ай бұрын
Africa is high and dry, perfect for animals leaving fossils and those fossils being found. Wetter climates are less likely to leave fossils due to wet acidic soil which will generally turn bones to mush after a century. Even today the best climates for humans are wetter climates.
@CreepyTrendManАй бұрын
Out of Africa theory is nonsense.
@tonycatmanАй бұрын
It isn't nonsense. It is fine to question it, but not to dismiss it without an alternative theory. So what's yours ?
@PhansiKhongolozaАй бұрын
@@tonycatmanHow much time do you have? I can give you around 10 reasons why it's total BS.
@sensational_cellar8606Ай бұрын
About 20% of Sub-Saharan Africans have DNA from an extinct humanoid species not present elsewhere in the world, meaning humans outside Africa did not originate there.
@JONFATSARNOTTАй бұрын
Unless they are the missing link!
@CreepyTrendManАй бұрын
@@bestcomsystems4458 Abundance of evidence to prove it being complete nonsense.
@artyinn1215Ай бұрын
The 'Out of Africa' hypothesis has been promoted for political reasons. As breeds of dog vary massively in temperament, looks and intelligence, so do the races of human beings.
@RossBirch-c4eАй бұрын
lots of people still think pitbulls kill because of "how they're raised" lol. In fact that's the go-to response from most people. They heard it on the radio or some other media and just repeat it
@peterfrance702Ай бұрын
How immensely inconvenient.
@Phillips66GeoАй бұрын
Hahaha, nice one
@mjones4083Ай бұрын
Yes,very anti-grift !
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
Dawn Butler would be upset!
@KevinRudd-w8sАй бұрын
I've been interested in science and history most of my seventy years, they were the only subjects I was any good at at school. With both, I have come to believe that theories, no matter how plausible at the time, can ultimately fall down when new evidence comes to light. Also, there are those who, for there own or others political sensibilities, are willing to advance their own theories which don't stand up to close scrutiny or attempt to denounce any new theories based on hard and empirical evidence as either mistaken, flawed or even manufactured in an attempt to preserve their prefered narrative. You have highlighted some these instances yourself Simon, the "black" Roman emperors for example, and I think most viewers to this channel haven't forgotten the actions of the previous government when they were claiming to be "following the science" when it is becoming increasingly obvious that that wasn't necessarily the case or the science was flawed. I suspect this new theory, which sounds perfectly plausible to me, will be fought tooth and nail by those academics who have built a career from the out of Africa narrative, and some will be too frightened for their careers should they be denounced for supporting it, especially those who work at the woke left indoctrination centres, or as they are sometimes known, British universities, where I suspect this will be seen as little short of heresy.
@andrewegan1732Ай бұрын
Well put Sir.
@396-m7eАй бұрын
I suspect David Bogus lia is feeding the draft of his new fiction through a paper shredder as we speak
@SaxonSuccessАй бұрын
Yes, it's the older well published generation that's holding us back. As you say, careers wasted and now open to ridicule. Well, never mind...
@rickjones-gl1wvАй бұрын
If Human Civilisation originated From Africa, we're Still Be Luving in Mud Huts.
@StooFras-TheFiresofHell.Ай бұрын
Aye and chucking spears about willy nilly.🤣
@thomasrobert4654Ай бұрын
@@StooFras-TheFiresofHell. the spears are shorter but the killing goes on.
@willfromhytheАй бұрын
Dawn Butler won't be happy about this theory, but then again she never seems to be happy.
@stephfoxwell4620Ай бұрын
Dawn believea Subsaharan Africans are a superior race.
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
Yes, I remember her... We wuz the first ones and the chosen ones! 🤣
@mjones4083Ай бұрын
@@O-p8w3r Chosen for what though ?
@bladerunner9646Ай бұрын
Those people never like the truth.
@bladerunner9646Ай бұрын
@@mjones4083to fill the prisons
@SoulsalivationАй бұрын
TBH I'm more bothered about where we are headed than where we came from. At the moment despite incredibly aggressive 'progressive' socio-political agendas both society and Humanity is rapidly degenerating. Forcing us to tolerate the intolerable has done nothing but bring society down.
@stevenfair2288Ай бұрын
Bingo.
@cant_CommentАй бұрын
just dont breed with the intolerable. thats what id do personally
@drewtatt6487Ай бұрын
Treated like cabbages and thrown in a handcart down a very steep slope to hell. By the less intelligent😢
@michellemurphy895Ай бұрын
The whole point is to separate us from our origin and our history. This is why we are in the situation, we are in today. Knowledge is power. In 50 years someone will say the same thing but where did all this start and why?!
@drewtatt6487Ай бұрын
@@michellemurphy895 Information super highway We no longer have only one source of knowledge.of all the conspiracy theories someone is close to the truth
@dragonofhatefulretribution9041Ай бұрын
Robert Sepehr’s videos about the OoA theory absolutely annihilate it.
@joebidet2050Ай бұрын
💯👍
@markaxworthy2508Ай бұрын
Robert Sepehr is a generalised conspiracy theorist who contributes nothing original to this debate..
@draoi99Ай бұрын
LOL 😂
@dragonofhatefulretribution9041Ай бұрын
@ Anyone who throws around the slur “conspiracy theorist” when dealing with forbidden anthropology can be discounted from this debate like a cattle-like coomer.
@martinjackman2943Ай бұрын
@@markaxworthy2508 I wouldn't say "nothing"... a strand .. but with obvious biases.. best taken with a pinch of salt.
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
When you meet any Africans, you realise that we are not related with them! 🤣
@thomasrobert4654Ай бұрын
it took me less than a week on arrival in sub-saharan africa to realise we were not the same.
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
@@thomasrobert4654 Yes, this is true! 💯 Moreover, I remember a guy who spent a few decades in one of those places, and when he came back to Europe was so surprised to see them wearing clothes... 😅
@samdoe3021Ай бұрын
@@O-p8w3r And Persians?
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
@@samdoe3021 What is the problem with Persians? Stay on topic! 🤬
@mauricemuir7462Ай бұрын
We are not the same as the Flintstone people.
@dantheman9135Ай бұрын
Kinda clear. That's where it stalled...
@laurasteif86Ай бұрын
😂🤣😂🤣😁
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
👍👍👍🤣🤣🤣
@White_Fox_of_the_MistsАй бұрын
The implications of this unseat the entire foundation of what’s been built on the lie.
@markadams738Ай бұрын
Correct. Imagine the consequences.
@stevebreedon62Ай бұрын
But the science was settled.
@markadams738Ай бұрын
@@stevebreedon62 er is the comment tongue in cheek ? Science is never settled. It continually evolves .
@JafmanzАй бұрын
No.... a lot is most certainly settled. @@markadams738
@somebloke13Ай бұрын
@@markadams738Unlike blacks...
@FailsafeZeroАй бұрын
OoA is one of those things you're told as a child and just accept, even though everything you see in real life seems to suggest otherwise.
@x-LINX-x18 күн бұрын
it makes sense evolutionarily, as we left the epicenter we became more complex
@davidh7071Ай бұрын
Big brain argument: If all humans originated in Africa, then Europeans colonizing Africa was just a matter of us returning home and claiming what was also ours
@vespasianflavius2766Ай бұрын
😂 right lol. Even if we did all come from Africa we separated and evolved separately the only time first matters is in a race.
@davidh7071Ай бұрын
@@patrizioorru772 Should Europeans receive reparations from Turkey, Algeria and Morocco, since Iberia, Sicily, the Balkans and elsewhere in eastern Europe were subject to colonisation and enslavement?
@MarkMcCullough-y5sАй бұрын
When will I get my reparations for Africans moving into Europe and destroying my neanderthal ancestors?
@knowbs2122Ай бұрын
By the looks of it, it aint even started
@ouroborosirvingtonАй бұрын
I think the ancient aliens came down to earth and interfered with all the races except when they got to Africa they said "there's nothing we can do here...." 🤣
@alanhargreaves-thevoiceofr2361Ай бұрын
The monkeys had beaten them to it. .. lol
@AnthonyTobyEllenor-pi4jq29 күн бұрын
The ancient aliens dumped the contents of their spaceships latrines over what is now Africa, that's where Africans come from !
@ouroborosirvington29 күн бұрын
@AnthonyTobyEllenor-pi4jq ouch daz nast'eh
@rymkervic123456Ай бұрын
I've never believed that we are all out of Africa. I'm sure development happened different places in different manners (depending on environment) and who survived might have been down to the weather cycles of the Earth.
@cant_CommentАй бұрын
the most successful civilizations arose in warm wet regions of the earth usually along rivers and coastal areas. interesting how sub saharan afrca is a warm wet region but.....
@versioncity1Ай бұрын
You should consider applying to teach at the Smithsonian which such insight and knowledge.
@robinclarke9978Ай бұрын
The out of Africa theory only recently came about after the discovery of the oldest remains of early humans in Africa. Recently older have been found in several places around the world giving rise to further theories as to the development of modern humans. We are dependent on a very small number of samples of fossils. I future more may be discovered giving rise to other theories. A theory is the likely hypothesis of a chain of events given the known facts. Tomorrow, itmay be different again,but Lucy may well be old hat.
@stevendavis2122Ай бұрын
My understanding of the modern human evolution was, that, there was three distinct species of humans developing independently: Mongoloid (Asia),Negroid (Africa),and Caucasoid (Europe). The migration and interbreeding of the various species is where we find ourselves today.
@tonycatmanАй бұрын
The 'three races' idea was the standard belief until about the 1960's. I'm not sure if it fell out of favour for political reasons, or scientific ones. It is a subject which is taboo to ask or research. But don't forget that those observations were based entirely on phenotypic differences rather than genetic ones. It is very reasonable to assume that sub-saharan Africans were isolated for a hundred thousand years or so due to the barrier of the Sahara desert, and the Australian aborigines due to the isolation by sea.
@stevendavis2122Ай бұрын
@@tonycatman Of course, we’re at the mercy of scientific research that doesn’t follow the money for political reasons.
@tonycatmanАй бұрын
@@stevendavis2122 That's true, and a little depressing. All scientific research today has an ideological bias. Even in my field (machine learning),. where we literally have to exclude the gender class when performing classification tasks.
@chrisdonishАй бұрын
Different species do not interbreed. If you can Breed and produce fertile offsprings, you are the same species,modern humans were way too advanced for environments to change us into different species.
@stevendavis2122Ай бұрын
@ I beg to differ. If scientists found the small amount of difference that there are in various humans; in other animals, they would classed as a different species. Species allows for the small differences that exists within a genus, within a family.
@sicks6sixАй бұрын
human life started in many places all at once, the Serengeti in Africa is one of those places but fossils suggest that the first place was in southern Russia as human remains have been found in caves there that predate anything found anywhere in Africa, this notion that mankind marched out of Africa and colonised the world in rubbish, they were the more aggressive of the human types of that time and were responsible for the demise of other human species, this is now regarded as fact unless you are David Attenborough who works for the BBC and champions Gretta Thunbergs ridiculous theories also,
@mogznwazАй бұрын
They didn’t ‘march’ they fled an increasingly inhospitable environment. DNA suggests there might only have been a couple of hundred of us left.
@StooFras-TheFiresofHell.Ай бұрын
Surely if we had all marched out of Africa and colonised the world we would all have been black, just a thought.🤔
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
And they still are the most aggressive ones... 🤬
@tysolbohan6446Ай бұрын
Well first of all I would need to see the studies you talking about 2nd of all there was a mount toba eruption that killed early modern humans we are a result of a Eurasian bottle neck so even if they were true there would be very little genetic similarities between us and them.
@Occident.Ай бұрын
DA is an AH.
@daryllportas8453Ай бұрын
We are almost a different species and should have little to do with each other. We have different paths. As pastor Butler famously said: "mixing white people with black is like mixing Sh*t and ice-cream, it does wonders for the sh*t, but doesn't do anything for the ice-cream.
@Occident.Ай бұрын
Great saying. Very true.
@vespasianflavius2766Ай бұрын
😂
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
Brilliant! 😂
@JoeyClips-z8lАй бұрын
lol I respect your view if that’s how you see it but would you not at least blame white people for the mixing of people had they just left them alone and in Africa you would be able to have a whole country of America just for whites
@bobgrant9882Ай бұрын
Colour or country is not important.The main issue is Peace with God through the shed blood of the Lord Jesus Christ. John 3:16
@MikeSmith-go8wkАй бұрын
You don't half come late to the party Simon. We've known this for years. The out of Africa theory was proved wrong yonks ago
@Elio-t8sАй бұрын
Naaaah whyte MAAAN “wE wAs fIrsT N SHEIT”
@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebbАй бұрын
But new evidence is still emerging all the time.
@TrevorMelbourne-ef1inАй бұрын
He’s not late. That said, I’ve always been skeptical about modern humans ONLY arising out of Africa.
@goblez5900Ай бұрын
You've only come a fraction of the way, human evolution isn't real.
@simonmilligan7497Ай бұрын
Has it been proved wrong? Perhaps you could provide some evidence for this claim?
@evolassunglasses4673Ай бұрын
We live under "The Empire of Lies".
@Occident.Ай бұрын
Oy vey.
@bendenisereedy7865Ай бұрын
Humans who lived near cold oceans had a diet rich in oily fish, which explains white European intellectual brilliance amongst races.
@tonynoonan3723Ай бұрын
Why are the oily fish themselves not clever then ? !
@cant_CommentАй бұрын
except that those who lived near cold oceans in europe actually ate mostly meat, the meat of large megafauna and sometimes meat of fish and other small animals. isotopic evidence shows this. humans were at the top of the food chain. the apex predator of apex predators. those who lived in subsaharan afrca also had a meat heavy diet. they can eat the same diet europeans eat but nothing will change their biology. they are different
@cant_CommentАй бұрын
@@tonynoonan3723 by that logic, why arent algae clever then?
@tonynoonan3723Ай бұрын
@@cant_Comment You need to bio accumulate !! We are of course being facetious !
@manoo422Ай бұрын
Africa, the only country in the world without any history to speak of...
@vespasianflavius2766Ай бұрын
Africa is not a country but I do agree with the sentiment
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
It's a continent, but I agree with you! 💯
@davidp4456Ай бұрын
So the small town of ancient Egypt, civilisations in Carthage, Mauritania and many others in Africa, simply don’t count then? Tozzers!
@forthfareanАй бұрын
Well, significant history anyway. North Africa ,of course, is totally different.
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
@@davidp4456 You are talking about noth Africa, darling! Totally different people! 😜
@atoning2009Ай бұрын
show any examples of any humans changing skin colour on the last ten thousand years of movement
@martinoconnor4314Ай бұрын
Michael Jackson!
@williamsharp2532Ай бұрын
@@martinoconnor4314 Ha, got him there!
@JP-lk2qsАй бұрын
@@martinoconnor4314tonnes of money thrown at that project 😊
@careytitan9097Ай бұрын
Or hair and eyes, skulls and skeletons!
@chrisdonishАй бұрын
Do you know what an albino is? Do you know why this phenomenon happens? These random mutations are how a generation changes over time.
@obus7800Ай бұрын
Imagine if only Africans developed in Africa that might explain a lot.
@HaleyChain-vw8rrАй бұрын
The neanderthals last stronghold was certainly Europe
@jasonbourne7499Ай бұрын
Why were they so unadvanced ?
@HarrySmith-hr2ivАй бұрын
@@jasonbourne7499 Because before Europe the neanderthals originated in Africa.
@musthaveacamel2157Ай бұрын
@HaleyChain-vw8rr And that was the magic ingredient
@patricka.crawley6572Ай бұрын
@@jasonbourne7499 ...slavery...the White Man...Global Warming...errmm...
@flybobbie1449Ай бұрын
Often wondered why Japanese and Chinese are so white?
@MrJohnnysevenАй бұрын
Lol and they call them people of "colour" as well 😂
@richardjamesclemo6235Ай бұрын
The modern day Japanese have only been in Japan for 2000 years, before that it was habited by people with European features.
@cant_CommentАй бұрын
@@richardjamesclemo6235 modern japanese dont even look the same as japanese from 100 years ago. its incredible just how different they look now. probably got something to do with their post-ww2 diet. they were predominantly vegetarian before the war(except the uppercIass). the upperclass had more european features on top of that they also ate more meat. modern japanese are no longer vegetarian. they are now bigger and taller than their pre-war counterparts.
@chrisdonishАй бұрын
Because there are winter conditions in their environment. Humans living in areas with winter conditions will have lighter skin.
@tysolbohan6446Ай бұрын
@@chrisdonishthey look more white skinned but facially look way more distinct an Indian looks more European than an Japanese. Give it lighter skin give it blue eyes and he could pass as a white guy. Same with a middle easterner looking European is about skull shape obviously they won't look perfectly European just broad similarities.
@Julian-pb4lrАй бұрын
The OoA theory never seemed right. The “BigBang” theory doesn’t either.
@versioncity1Ай бұрын
well that's it then. it doesn't seem right to you. let's revise evolutionary biology, physics and chemistry. So O' great one, where shall we start?
@scotland638Ай бұрын
🤡
@darrenscrowston9386Ай бұрын
@@versioncity1you can start by telling me if the Big Bang was an event in linear time, or not.
@Julian-pb4lrАй бұрын
@@versioncity1 Both are just theories at the moment. The fossil record is nowhere near complete and unless you believe in magic, what caused the Big Bang and everything from nothing. I have a theory that fairies dance at the bottom of my garden.
@fuzzacker.Ай бұрын
The Out of Africa theory will remain, as long as broadcasters like the BBC teach it so.
@scotland638Ай бұрын
It will remain because its true.
@amandasmith3716Ай бұрын
@@scotland638but it’s not true a jaw bone found in Israel pre-dates bones found in Africa. Even the person who claimed the out of Africa theory has changed his mind. It was just a theory after all.
@scotland638Ай бұрын
@amandasmith3716 Even those who discovered it agree it is the earliest bone outside of Africa. It is not the earliest. Lucy from Africa is much older. And gravity is a theory,though I guess you agree that is true.
@bushwhackeddos.2703Ай бұрын
Are we to believe that if other groups stay in Europe long enough, they will magically turn into Europeans ?
@robertbrown3413Ай бұрын
According to the BBC lots of black people lived here for 6 centuries. No evidence they are magically turning into Europeans.
@Greatricardo524414 күн бұрын
That will never happen, as they will retain their own cultural behaviour.
@omgitsabloodyandroid5161Ай бұрын
We wuz Kangz and phirst. Oh wait…
@HaleyChain-vw8rrАй бұрын
The vikingz spirit writ large
@alleuropetravelАй бұрын
I have never believed the emergence of all humans in Africa theory. Never!
@DorothyDianeParker-to2qrАй бұрын
I'm with you on this...
@TheThedislikerАй бұрын
why not?
@clownofthetimes6727Ай бұрын
Considering history and science suggest we did I have to ask you why not?
@nigelarmstrong252Ай бұрын
Ditto. I always thought it was complete bunkum.
@Nightbreed24Ай бұрын
@@TheThedisliker We're too diverse. An alien species would probably regard the races as separate human species. Just imagine a space ship crewed by Alicia Schmidt, Adut Akech, The Mountain, James Herbert, Karan Soni, Bud Spencer, Emperor Naruhito, Sacha Baron Cohen, Danny Trejo, Mahlagha Jaberi, Nǃxau ǂToma and David Gupilil, showing up on your planet.
@kellyrobinson6663Ай бұрын
Fossils are bloody difficult for nature to make, let alone for us to find. There are probably tons of hominid species we will never discover because the bones couldn't fossilize due to the climate they lived in.
@mjones4083Ай бұрын
The 19th century belief always made much more sense to me than the "we all came out of Africa " belief . The very obvious differences in colour , facial forms and intelligences do not point to a "universal " ancestry .
@GUITARTIME202429 күн бұрын
Geographic separation explains plenty.
@mjones408327 күн бұрын
@@GUITARTIME2024 Yes.
@jacquilayton2557Ай бұрын
I often hear that homosapiens crossed with Neanderthals, but if all humans came from Africa, then surely they would’ve met in Africa rather than in Europe?
@ulrichenevoldsen8371Ай бұрын
That's not logical at all
@beckinfidelis3916Ай бұрын
Oh that's because a much older ancestor of both was in Europe and Africa a million years. They say the European lineage evolved into neanderthals, the African into early Sapiens. 🤷🏼♀️🤷🏼♀️ Neanderthals had bigger brains than modern humans! 😲😲
@tysolbohan6446Ай бұрын
Are you stupid they were enemies they typically avoided each other due to food and they were more insular as a culture and they left for Europe earlier they were still humans very smart people but when I say species they are clearly a sub species you and me share the same species and genus they don't but they are human as they closest to us on the broadest species sense it can't sucks they went extinct they were humans I wish they didn't extinct but I can't change the past
@tysolbohan6446Ай бұрын
@@beckinfidelis3916the European linkage did not evolve into neanrherthals they mixed with neanrherthals early cromagnon cromagnons in Europe much later . Cromagnons are humans and related to the same species neanrherthals are Independent sub species
@dannyboon4162Ай бұрын
It's difficult to understand the fact that some branches of humanity did, and created , everything while others did absolutely nothing. And still dont.
@lawLess-fs1qxАй бұрын
were all Africans is pure politics not science.
@chrisdonishАй бұрын
3000 years in the future people will be saying the same thing about earth when we colonize other planets.
@Bob.JenkinsАй бұрын
Human Evolution may not of started in Africa but it sure as hell, ended there.
@johnmac8084Ай бұрын
I'm glad you've covered this now Simon, I've been hoping you would
@harrymillon3340Ай бұрын
It would be quite a turn around if human life actually came out of Bognor Regis. Very plausible
@alanduncan9204Ай бұрын
I just have to stand naked and look in the mirror and it is obvious from skin tone, hair colour, blue eyes, nose, lips, teeth, jaw line, feet, hands and bone structure that I have zero connection with anything out of Africa. I don't need an anthropologist to go digging holes all over the planet to tell me the very obvious truth.
@GUITARTIME202429 күн бұрын
That's silly. We're talking thousands of generations and major geographical separation. You have ALL the same anatomy except for some differences in appearance, and you can procreate with any fertile black or Asian woman.
@alanduncan920429 күн бұрын
@@GUITARTIME2024 I beg to differ. Sub Saharan Africans have 19% DNA that has no recognised Hominid data. Bone density is greater in Africans. Achilles tendons are longer in Africans. A European skull and African skull can be easily identified from below as the teeth in the African jaw are semicircular and northern European is more triangular. Brow line and nasal cavity also differ significantly. I personally know Chinese people who have had DNA checks, and they have no mention of Africa which I believe supports the Denisovan line heading east from somewhere north of Turkey. They have now also found Denisovan in North American natives.
@GUITARTIME202429 күн бұрын
@alanduncan9204 Chinese propaganda is pushing hard to minimize Out of Africa, but Scientific American (magazine) says "Studies of Chinese populations show that 97.4% of their genetic make-up is from ancestral modern humans from Africa, with the rest coming from extinct forms such as Neanderthals and Denisovans. If there had been significant contributions from Chinese H. erectus, they would show up in the genetic data ".
@versioncity128 күн бұрын
It's probably hard for you to comprehend, but you do. Have you ever noticed that in other animals, like cats, dogs, snails, worms, birds. That not every cat looks identical to the other, but they are all cats. I know it's probably a huge imaginative leap for you to take, but try it. Go on.
@Jaymark-gk4liАй бұрын
Although I didn't have a problem per se with out of Africa the time frame never made sense, I was however dubious, my research in the last 18months has opened up a whole new approach tbh..fascinating 😮
@kevinjones3900Ай бұрын
When life was good. No rabbit holes . I still believe the African story to be a total fable. Most know its a story to devalue whytie.
@Michael-dr5reАй бұрын
One of my favourite topics you cover - the origins of humans. Thankyou for a year of fantastic and consistently great content
@marcharper5249Ай бұрын
Doesn’t matter how or where it started but we all know who came last in the evolutionary race 😊
@chrisdonishАй бұрын
Yes, those with the declining birth rates. As Darwin said, only the fittest survives and reproduces.
@ryanparker4996Ай бұрын
Anthropologist Robert Sepehr has some good videos debunking the out of africa nonsense if youre interested
@Redtop1965Ай бұрын
Yes, I have been listening to the discoveries and research about this for a few years. They also discussed why it wasn't being reported. It didn't or doesn’t suit the narrative.
@ericbrown7297Ай бұрын
‘Out of Africa’ has always just been a theory. With little or no proof to substantiate the theory. I, for one, have never really believed it for the obvious reasons.
@jasonali4122Ай бұрын
I am not sure how enthusiastic Nature is about the work. It didn't appear in the flagship journal (Nature), but in one of the somewhat less prestigious outlets that is associated with the publishing house (Communications Biology). That is odd as the paper was likely submitted firstly to the principal journal and thus didn't pass muster. Also, the reviewers' critiques (these can be downloaded) include many negative statements. In the short- and medium-term it will be interesting to see how the work is received by experts. Therefore, for the time being we should acknowledge the study's presence but refrain from reading too much into it until a view emerges.
@pjd1634Ай бұрын
Good position. Much is uncertain.
@whitelines3097Ай бұрын
I see Simon has not replied to your post ?
@williamtell6750Ай бұрын
That Nature may not be enthusiastic about the article does not mean much.
@martinjackman2943Ай бұрын
"Nature".. like many of the science journals, had been editorially captured.. they are not as free to go against the prevailing narratives as they once might have been .
@saraandivanevans6881Ай бұрын
The emerging view may not be the 'correct' version of what has actually happened in the very long history of humankind! Experts are very good at coming up with things which we should take as absolute truth and then it transpires not to be the case! They are theories and should be presented as such. I've never been able to quite believe we all started off as one type or human then changed. Just look at birds loads of different species and types but they all look like 'birds'. Same with dinosaurs etc etc. if this planet shows us anything it's that it full of difference and that is wonderful and should just be accepted by human beings too. Let's just let be what is seen as difference with our own eyes and stop telling each other what to think.
@roxammon5858Ай бұрын
Apparently there is Denisovan [ancient human similar to Neanderthal] DNA in South East Asian peoples, explaining why Tibetan peoples can thrive at higher altitudes.
@patricka.crawley6572Ай бұрын
As a Christian, I favour and lean towards the different humans, different places, different times. It fits the Bible message more coherently.
@ulrichenevoldsen8371Ай бұрын
Reality doesn't care about that book
@patricka.crawley6572Ай бұрын
@ulrichenevoldsen8371 Reality is agreeing with the 'MESSAGE' in the book. DUHHHHHH!
@ulrichenevoldsen8371Ай бұрын
@patricka.crawley6572 you clearly stated that you lean towards a direction because it fits the Bible. So the fact that reality maybe now fits ( your interpretation of the Bible) is just coincidence
@patricka.crawley6572Ай бұрын
@@ulrichenevoldsen8371 No. I did not say that.
@GUITARTIME202429 күн бұрын
But it's false. Multiple waves of earlier humans and modern humans left Africa over a long time span.
@justjacqueline2004Ай бұрын
Another inconvenient truth I suppose!
@chrisdonishАй бұрын
Only inconvenient to you apparently.
@anthonyclarke5579Ай бұрын
We can see what is possible, unburdened by what has been. Well that cleared that up, thank you.
@Gooders478Ай бұрын
Human fossils 500,000 years old have been found in Surrey. I've always wondered why Africans bypassed evolution if it's supposedly the crucible of humanity?
@Elio-t8sАй бұрын
Good morning Mr Webb
@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebbАй бұрын
Good morning!
@thesoulbrother8636Ай бұрын
@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb Hello again. I say Simon old chap, you are stating pure.......nonsense. However, you are still my favorite pseudohistorian old chap. Well, chip chip cheerio old chap and cheers!🍷
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
@@thesoulbrother8636 Are you upset? Do you need a nipple to drink your Afri-Cola? 😜
@O-p8w3rАй бұрын
@@thesoulbrother8636 Drinking wine is cultural appropriation, sweetie!🍷
@thesoulbrother8636Ай бұрын
@@O-p8w3r To a fruit-🎂, absolutely! Cheers!🍷
@martinjackman2943Ай бұрын
It seems that rather than a single locus for a pre sapiens bipedal homonid , a constant back and forth and intermixing of early hominids across North East Africa the Balkans Anatolia and western Asia created a wide range of precursors out of which elements gradually evolved into what we now know as humans. "It's complicated" as they say...
@FictionCautiousАй бұрын
the out of africa theory always felt preposterous, unbelievable misinfo.
@babylonsburning1Ай бұрын
I can't wait to see what they discover in Greenland and Antartica once the ice has melted.
@Okram.31Ай бұрын
It might blow too many minds out.
@darrenscrowston9386Ай бұрын
Er…you really don’t want to see what’s under Antarctica. No one does. It’s the only place in the world where American and Russian warships moor side by side and there’s a reason for that.
@Okram.31Ай бұрын
@@darrenscrowston9386 A very good reason for that indeed!
@babylonsburning1Ай бұрын
@@darrenscrowston9386 And the reason is?
@darrenscrowston9386Ай бұрын
@@babylonsburning1well it ain’t fossil fuels or minerals
@CristiNeaguАй бұрын
It most certainly isn't valid. This is supported by DNA sequencing.
@MichaelMacintosh-n9uАй бұрын
Rh neg blood proves that we didn’t come from Africa as it’s not found anywhere in the black race.
@northernlights8126Ай бұрын
It is found in Africa but it’s very rare.
@MichaelMacintosh-n9uАй бұрын
@ it’s not found in the black race but it’s found in some parts of Morocco where the berbers had connections with the Irish.
@GUITARTIME202429 күн бұрын
Wrong 😅😅😅
@MichaelMacintosh-n9u28 күн бұрын
@ it’s not found in Africa and that’s a fact.
@GUITARTIME202428 күн бұрын
@MichaelMacintosh-n9u that doesn't prove what you think it proves. Blue eyes aren't found I'm Africa either, because that came later as groups moved into Europe. Various adaptations happened outside Africa over time.
@DGHodgson-o8zАй бұрын
I think If life had begun in Africa, the world wouldn't have advanced beyond the stone age even now.
@witlesswonderthe2nd883Ай бұрын
They still haven’t got running water, sewage systems or electricity in homes in many of these countries yet claim they built our infrastructure and then rebuilt it again after the war.
@stephfoxwell4620Ай бұрын
They did invent Umbongo though. Dey drink it in de Jungle 🎵🎵
@grallochervideosАй бұрын
Anthropologists discovered in the 70’s that it is, in fact, most popular in de Congo.
@HaleyChain-vw8rrАй бұрын
Half expecting a Morris jig, hop to it '
@aaronlemaster7139Ай бұрын
Richard Dawkins would seriously disagree with you because Apes did not become human. Apparently, human genetics have no beginning process. It just randomly happened. All hominids just develop randomly and separately. And then there is Cro Magnon. While most hominids are very similar for about 4-8 million years with little and minimal changes, Cro Magnon becomes drastically different, looks drastically different, moves drastically different... just drastically different overall. There is not enough time for these changes to have occurred incrementally. Out of Africa is a debunked idea.
@jacktribble5253Ай бұрын
The "Out of Africa" theory didn't sit with me some fifty years ago when I was in preschool. The more I learned about adaptation, the less I believed in it. The necessary time spans for particular adaptations didn't mesh up. A fundamental shift in physiology of that magnitude would not happen that quickly. Or easily. And any intermediate forms would be in evidence somewhere...
@LamneYokaMouАй бұрын
New research suggests the controversial fossilized imprints, found on the Greek island of Crete in 2002, are around 6.05 million years old.
@gillian-n2sАй бұрын
The garden of Eden. Made out of dust. Breath of life given by God. Amen 🙏
@CharonupthekuiperАй бұрын
The species described, Anadoluvius, is 8.7 million years old and far older than humans and their most recent ancestors. There are too many possibilities to nail down this alternative proposal to the OoA model, all we know is this hominin appears in Turkey at least 8.7 million years ago. As always fossil records are heavily biased towards dry areas where they likely to be preserved. Genetic analysis shows Africans to be the most diverse, implying this is the oldest group. However a major event 70,000 years ago caused many populations to collapse, and this might have affected humans in higher latitudes the most. Despite the buzz word being 'diversity', we aren't a very diverse species.
@albert7311Ай бұрын
Which species are more diverse?
@CharonupthekuiperАй бұрын
@albert7311 dogs, they have a huge diversity and all have descended from wolves, although many highly bred pedigree animals have a narrow variation within the breed. Chimps show much more diversity than humans and are our closest relatives.
@grahambell4310Ай бұрын
@@albert7311 Dogs? 🐕🐩🐺🦊
@tysolbohan6446Ай бұрын
Your talking about a species that split from us earlier than chimpanzees are you talking the fucking piss?
@Mark70609Ай бұрын
Thanks for the video. I wouldn’t have heard about this otherwise.
@versioncity128 күн бұрын
there might be a reason for that.
@Antipodean33Ай бұрын
Looking at humans and their massive differences makes the out of Africa theory looks doubtful. What the truth is I'd love to know.
@versioncity128 күн бұрын
It actually doesn't at all. It supports it, if you had the most basic knowledge of human evolution and adaptation your would know this.
@Antipodean3328 күн бұрын
@@versioncity1 If you know tell us, enlighten us all, otherwise don't waste our time with snarky comments with no substance. You wouldn't be a teenage girl going to uni would you by any chance?
@versioncity128 күн бұрын
@@Antipodean33 No I wouldn't be. You want to know what creates differences in humans?
@pjd1634Ай бұрын
Interesting. Thank you.
@theragoooverlord5021Ай бұрын
History is written by the winners also same winners are most likely lying
@JP-lk2qsАй бұрын
True.Whatever suits their narrative and politics
@Occident.Ай бұрын
Like the winners of 1945 have never stopped lying.
@ParaBellum2024Ай бұрын
Can this not be settled by detailed examination of DNA?
@chrisdonishАй бұрын
You going to examine the DNA of 8 billion humans?
@ParaBellum2024Ай бұрын
@@chrisdonish Don't be foolish, you wouldn't need to test everyone. Just representative samples from different people around the world, along with analysis of preserved remains from archaeological sites should do it.