Sign up for "Finding Moses" www.mythvisionpodcast.com/moses
@Thutmoses2 жыл бұрын
Found him
@ready1fire1aim12 жыл бұрын
Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS): “When Elyon gave the nations as an inheritance, when he separated the sons of man, he set the boundaries of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God (bene elohim). For Yahweh’s portion was his people; Jacob was the lot of his inheritance”. Masoretic Text (MT): “When Elyon gave the nations their inheritance, when he divided all the sons of man, he set the boundaries of the peoples according to the number of the sons of Israel (bene yisrael). For Yahweh’s portion was his people, Jacob was the lot of his inheritance”. Septuagint (LXX): “When the Most High divided the nations, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the boundaries of the nations according to the number of the angels of God (aggelón theou). And his people Jacob became the portion of the Lord, Israel was the line of his inheritance”. Samaritan Pentateuch (SP): "When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel. For the LORD's portion is his people; Jacob is the lot of his inheritance, Israel" .
@Braglemaster1232 жыл бұрын
Only we Jews are G-d’s only eternal people ‘ ✡️✡️🇮🇱🇮🇱❤❤
@Braglemaster1232 жыл бұрын
Ask Rabbi Tovia Singer ? He’ll set you straight !!
@Thutmoses2 жыл бұрын
@@Braglemaster123 THAT IS A LIE!!!! DO NOT BE SO IGNORANT!
@davidfitnesstech Жыл бұрын
I love that like a true *historian,* Bart doesn't *really care if you believe* the *"narrative"* or not, he just tries to get to the *truth and origins* of the stories ect..
@almitrahopkins1873 Жыл бұрын
That’s theology, as opposed to divinity studies or seminary. Theology assumes there is exaggeration in every tale, unlike the others. Religion is just folktales on steroids. Unwavering faith would make Grimm’s fairytales every bit as much of a solid cultural foundation as the Bible to a student of Theology.
@jessicamessica2271 Жыл бұрын
@@almitrahopkins1873I'd argue that history is even more important than theology. That and linguistics. Reading the history of what was happening politically and then looking at the story's is enlightening. The bible is full of political commentary lol
@almitrahopkins1873 Жыл бұрын
@@jessicamessica2271 The problem is that evangelical Christians, especially the literalists, take their Bible as history and all other histories as false. I can pinpoint the rough period where the event mythologized in Exodus would have had to happen, but it requires approaching it from a point of view that the event was legendary, not entirely mythology. The Evangelicals blow a gasket at that notion. Looking at the history of the period between Amenhotep IV (Anhkenaten) to Paramessu (Ramesses I) all of the major details of the story in Exodus could be derived from recorded history. You have reference to hebirru mercenaries in the Amarna letters, meaning the Hebrew were in Egypt, just not as slaves (as we would understand it). We have the kingdom of Mitanni (Midian) just north of the Egyptian borders at Kadesh in modern-day Syria. We have the restoration of the temples during the reign of Tutanhkamun, Ay and Horemheb, giving us the context for the Golden Calf. We have the founding of a new capitol by Paramessu whose regnal name was Ramesses, so using the name Paramessu would be a denial of his divinity (Paramessu and Pi-Ramesses are spelled the same in Hebrew). Ramesses I and his son Seti I fought several campaigns against rebellious tribes in the Levant. The Bible alone paints Exodus as an escape from slavery without any corroboration. Once you begin to interpret it with additional details from history and archeology, it looks more like a revolt by the mercenaries levied in Canaan against the levy of workers to build the new capitol of the first king in the 19th dynasty. You have to dismiss the legendary history in the Bible as being inaccurate and compare it to other histories to see a complete narrative and accurate history.
@DontDrinkthatstuff Жыл бұрын
@@jessicamessica2271The Bible's purpose is to be subversive on some level. It's presenting non-Jews with a specific story in the NT & it has succeeded.
@jessicamessica2271 Жыл бұрын
@TruthDissident what story is that. The new testament is surprisingly pro roman when considering the time and ace it was written in.
@timhallas4275 Жыл бұрын
Even if "Moses" existed, he did not turn the Nile river to blood, he did not turn his staff into a snake, he did not cause plagues on Egypt, and he did not part the Red sea. Interesting fact: Before the movie staring Charlton Heston, approximately 35% of Christians, when asked, said they believed that Moses was real and that he parted the Red sea. After the movie hit the theaters, a survey was done and that number went up to 75%. Amazing what a great acting job can do for a fictional tale.
@DeadstockDownsouth7 ай бұрын
So why didnt you mention that Muhammad didnt split the moon?
@timhallas42757 ай бұрын
@@DeadstockDownsouth Why should I?
@DeadstockDownsouth7 ай бұрын
@@timhallas4275 because u seem to be picking on the group that’s not going to find n kill u😂 smart man
@timhallas42757 ай бұрын
@@DeadstockDownsouth I'm picking on the religion that has most effected my country and my life. At least Muslims don't pretend to be my friend.
@MindToPage6 ай бұрын
@@DeadstockDownsouth just a thought but maybe go to a KZbin video debating the legitimacy of Muhammad’s claims if you want to see those comments? What an idiotic thing to comment under a video titled did mosses exist.
@jamesmartenson8203 Жыл бұрын
A few weeks ago, I visited the West Bank. Our group went to a Jewish settlement on the West Bank that is considered illegal under international law, because it is on land that belongs to the Palestinians. We listened to one of the settlers tell us that Israel has the right to control all of the land on the West Bank, because God gave it to them (see one of the stories about Moses in Deuteronomy 34:4, for example). The settler said that he believes that the story of the Exodus, in which about 2.5 million people left Egypt for the promised land, is literally true. Never mind the fact that a group of people about 20 times the population of my home town, Rochester MN (the third largest city in MN at 121500 people) wandered across the desert and did not leave the slightest trace of any archeological evidence. This highlights the problem with Biblical literalism. If you believe that the story of Moses and the Exodus is literally true, you can justify stealing land from another group. If you instead believe that the story is a metaphor that highlights the human experience of moving from slavery to freedom (with all of its layers of meaning), you can now reach a completely different conclusion about how to treat your fellow human beings. The important work of Bart Ehrman and others is not just a purely academic matter. It has real consequences for how we treat our fellow human beings. That is why honest Biblical scholarship, that is not prejudiced by any a priori religious bias, is so important.
@Ogofor3913 Жыл бұрын
Thank you🌹
@Gigislaps Жыл бұрын
All of this ❤
@sammcrae8892 Жыл бұрын
I wonder why they call it Israel? Could it be because it is Israel? The Israel that God gave to the Jews as an eternal inheritance, that would stretch from the Nile to the Euphrates? Thinking themselves wise...
@willx9352 Жыл бұрын
All groups have their own myths. The million or so Jews expelled from Arab countries and whose descendants now live in Israel, and the more than a million Christians expelled from various Muslim lands and those various religious minorities still living in Muslim countries that continue to face ongoing discrimination and persecution might question the Islamic myths.
@ericstewart9742 Жыл бұрын
Whatever the claims to the land, I will side with the people-group who doesn’t want to kill me next.
@nomanor79872 жыл бұрын
I just can’t help but think the Egyptian monotheistic Aten cult influenced Israelite religion somehow. Moses is an Egyptian name but also Aaron, Miriam and other Levites.
@reinercelsus82992 жыл бұрын
@@pedrosaborido9648 No, doesn't make sense. The Hyksos had been in power and ruled as pharaos until they were expelled, eventually sieged and destroyed in Canaan.
@reinercelsus82992 жыл бұрын
Jericho was already destroyed in the 16th century BCE and never rebuilt, and its last walls had only existed for not more than a few decades. The most plausible origin was therefore Iah-Moses/Aa-Moses a.k.a. Ahmose, who happened to claim Amen "the Father" himself had spoken to him and defeated pharaoh (the ruling Hyksos). Even the name Aa-ron starts with the same syllable and hints to the same time, the end of the 2nd intermediate period.
@fordprefect53042 жыл бұрын
Yahweh was the Canaanite god of war and thunder. The Hebrews were Canaanites.
@fordprefect53042 жыл бұрын
@@pedrosaborido9648 The Hyksos, were expelled from Egypt and pursued by the Egyptian to the banks of the Euphrates in 1450BCE. The nations of Israel and Judah did not take shape until the 10th century Egypt controlled Canaan from 1450BCE until they lost there last fortress at Jaffa in 1126BCE
@fordprefect53042 жыл бұрын
@@pedrosaborido9648 I beg to differ. We know the Hebrews were Canaanites living in the hills of Canaan. We know they formed two separate nations by the 9th century. This has been confirmed by the Assyrian's and the Moabites who engaged them in battle. We also have the city of Samaria built by King Omri and dated to the 9th century
@douglasphillips58702 жыл бұрын
The Levant was a crossroads that connected a number of ancient cultures. It's not unreasonable that stories known to those other cultures were spread through the area.
@cheryldeboissiere18512 жыл бұрын
👏 👏 👏 👏 👏
@Madasin_Paine7 ай бұрын
Geostrategic military economic rampart and naturally that makes sense then and now. White so called Jews are imported and misled by supremacy religion and escapism to become dupes quislings and labor occupiers to hold stolen territory by their masters, investors bosses and misleaders...a trite common sad story where you find UK US Fr Rome Germany.. Swiss... Royal Scam & Grand Illusion or Game of Lives
@GeorgekwessiDavis3 ай бұрын
love your response...it touches on various cultural elements during that time....
@mosotheshowstarta71832 жыл бұрын
I love Bart's laugh when he is posed a question. Im reading his 'heaven and hell' and its a really good book.
@MrKoalaburger2 жыл бұрын
Finished that book last year, it's great. Happy reading!
@Thutmoses2 жыл бұрын
let me explain simply heaven and hell... hell is the darkness of space without being allowed to par take in the circle of life or live under the light of suns as a soul! God of all himself will remove you if you go against his philosophy of life completely as have some in the past of past planets and civilisations like on mars... Heaven is the complete opposite and is when we advance spiritually from living as a live human being without dying we are accepted by god to become a sun ourself and give life to the planets around thy sun being... we can incarnate on these planets if we choose too help influence its ways of life and teach also... but know this is not heaven... when we become a sun we are allowed to enter heaven regularly like a HUB MEETING SPACE! but that HUB happens to be the world you spiritually advanced on... and all those who spiritually advanced on that planet too will be there in the hub if ever they choose to visit it instead of there own suns planets... I was given the chance to become a sun but I was afraid at first from my lack of experience... I live here now as a man and realise I'm not afraid anymore to become more then just a man... or a soul who spawns as a man on planets... the sun of this realm is the god of this realm... know it is not the GOD OF ALL though... for each sun in space has a GOD OVER IT... being the ORIGINAL FIRST SUN... the first light... that is the SOUL of which MADE FIRST LIFE PSYICALLY NOT JUST DREAMS... and so we call him the GOD OF ALL and we live in his realms learning how we too can manifest OUR OWN DREAMS IN OUR OWN WORLDS... thank you all for listening now you know your goal in life besides growing old... gain more light and become a sun following the GOD OF ALL and practice giving life to other!
@jeffforsythe9514 Жыл бұрын
We all have a primordial soul which is immortal. When the body dies, this soul reincarnates either here or Hell. Heaven can only be obtained when we are alive....................falundafa
@billymanilli Жыл бұрын
@@jeffforsythe9514 I'd sure love to see the proof for that!
@marcomoreno6748 Жыл бұрын
@@jeffforsythe9514"we all have a primordial soul" What is a primordial soul?
@InigoMontoya-2 жыл бұрын
If there wasn’t a Moses, can I still beat my slaves- as long as they don’t die within 3 days?
@serpentsepia66385 ай бұрын
The Bible says you can't beat them at all. Same verse.
@mud2134 ай бұрын
@@serpentsepia6638That doesn't make any sense. Exodus 21:20-21 reads “Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property." In other words, you can beat your slave (with a rod) as long as that act doesn't actually kill them within a couple days. Perhaps because after that point it is hard to tell whether your beating was the cause of their death. Where does it say you can't beat your slave?
@serpentsepia66384 ай бұрын
@@mud213 A slave isn't going to recover from a beating in two days. That's the point.
@steveng8251 Жыл бұрын
I appreciate your approach to supporting your guests. It is wholesome and humble. Thank you for all of the scholars that you have on sir.
@rayanbay2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Ericwest1000 Жыл бұрын
Have any of you heard about Sigmund Freud's book MOSES AND MONOTHEISM? He wasn't a biblical scholar, but he was extremely well-read and he wanted to explore the reason why the Jews consider themselves the "Chosen People," and why they were sure that there was only one "True God," who devoted all of his time to guiding their history, all of which got them into a lot of trouble over the centuries from other peoples whose land they wandered into. Anyway, the book was highly controversial, but Freud had scholarly sources for arguing that "Moses" was an Egyptian priest, who subscribed to the theory of Akhenatan, a pharaoh who established a new cult in the 14th century B.C. arguing there was only one God, a solar God named "Aton." In this act, Pharaoh Akhenatan was able to consolidate power in Egypt by undermining the gods in other cities and the priests who claimed their power through their own brand of gods. Anyway, when Akhenatan died, there was civil war and subsequently the other gods were re-certified. Freud suggested that one particular priest "Moses" remained faithful to the teaching regarding Akhenatan's God - and made his appeal to the Israelite Jewish community living as an underclass in Egypt - convinced them - and then led them out of Egypt. It's a wild card, but Freud published the book in the 1930s when anti-semitism was ratcheting up all over Europe and he took a lot of grief for this book, which he really didn't have to write and publish so late in his own life...
@3-Kashmir9 ай бұрын
The thing with Freud is... When he thought he was onto something he really would get lost into it! 😂
@Madasin_Paine7 ай бұрын
Big influencer for Phrma bros selling cocaine for two competitors, ONE US, One European I recall ... He's productive and imperfect yet indelibly contributory.
@fordprefect53042 жыл бұрын
Per Prof Israel Finkelstein, archeological evidence shows the Torah could not have been written before the 7th century. There are too many cites and countries mentioned to have been written before that date. i.e the country of Edom did not exist before 725BCE.
@Amanda-cd6dm2 жыл бұрын
And if Edom is named after Esau, wouldn't Eden also be a form of Edom
@jacksonaaron1030842 жыл бұрын
@@Amanda-cd6dm it's seems Eden and Aden are so similar which is in Iraq.
@memcrew12 жыл бұрын
@@Amanda-cd6dm no
@wannabe_scholar822 жыл бұрын
definitely not compiled before the 7th century bce but parts were def written further back
@chrisfieramosca2 жыл бұрын
Yes that’s why the Gospel of John quotes from Exodus
@Ken_Scaletta2 жыл бұрын
Regarding Egyptian names in a Hebrew story, Egypt occupied Canaan for hundreds of years, It was a vassel kingdom. The cities had Egyptian governors. A lot of them probably had Egyptian names. The Moses story reverses a trope where a person of humble origin is retrojectively given a secret, royal origin (e,g. Sargon, King Arthur). The trope is that a baby of royal heritage is secretly raised by peasants, but the Moses story claims that an Egyptian ruler was really secretly an Israelite.
@stevenv64632 жыл бұрын
Alternatively some understand the Levites as being the remnants of mixed race Egyptian officials (Hittite father Egyptian mother, Egyptian father Canaanite mother, kind of couplings) from the period of Egyptian dominance of Canaan. This is how they explain why so many Levite people have Egyptian names, distinct genetics, and no land claims in the Torah. Plus Levi is supposed to mean something like clinging or attached (Genesis says because now Jacob will cling to me that I gave birth) ie people attached to the land but not from it.
@Cat.Daddy. Жыл бұрын
@Ken_Scaletta What does ‘retrojectively’ mean? I was unable to find a definition.
@mikev46213 ай бұрын
@@Cat.Daddy. A correction inserted later to tidy up an anomaly or anachronism
@moonpearl47362 жыл бұрын
I actually attended one Rabbi Wolpe's events discussing the topic of the historicity of the Exodus. It was fascinating, because on the one hand he says "no, it didn't really happen, at least how it is written" but "nevertheless we all stood there at Sinai." I guess this is a "may not be true mythology but it is OUR mythology" things, but then one has to ask what that means to you.
@tarhunta21112 жыл бұрын
It means it's total bullshit.
@Seekingtruth-mx3ur2 жыл бұрын
@@tarhunta2111 yupp made by the greeks
@googleboogle51202 жыл бұрын
The biblical geography has been misinterpreted from day one. The entire theatre of the biblical events is Southern Arabia. most of the places still go by their biblical names and some have witnessed little variation. The biblical few names existing now in and around current Israel came into being as a result of human immigrations and return from the captivity in today's Iraq. The captivity took place from Yemen. Beni Israel as well as like other 80 ( Beni) Tribes.
@alanpennie80132 жыл бұрын
Moonpearl Living where they did The Jews of those days always had to define themselves in relation to Egypt whose shadow loomed over them. The Exodus story was a good way to do that (except when it wasn't).
@dennswicker30242 жыл бұрын
@@Seekingtruth-mx3ur Maybe geeks. lol
@Glowblue110 ай бұрын
His comment about biblical scholars with faith commitments is surprising. I just don’t understand how any biblical scholar could stay religious after becoming so familiar with the book that it’s abundantly clear that humans wrote it with human agendas in mind, and then a plethora of editors chimed in their their own agendas over thousands of years. That’s the crack that broke my faith in the end.
@WickedFelina Жыл бұрын
The Mahabharata, a book out of the Vedas, the oldest continuously practiced religion on the planet which birthed Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikh, Janists, Karna a son of one of the Gods was born of a young unmarried woman who put him in a basket and floated him down the river. He was found by a carriage driver, not a princess. He became great with superhuman talents with no training.
@eprd313 Жыл бұрын
Great comment! Thanks for this info
@KishoreG2396 Жыл бұрын
The Mahabharata is not a book out of the Vedas. It is a seperate work that postdates the vedas by multiple centuries.
@kirstencorby8465 Жыл бұрын
In Jungian terns you could just say these are the archetypes bubbling up in different cultures. The miraculous birth, the flight from enemies, the test of faith, etc.
@Cat.Daddy. Жыл бұрын
@@KishoreG2396 Fitzgerald, James (1985). "India's Fifth Veda: The Mahabharata's Presentation of Itself". Journal of South Asian Literature.
@KishoreG2396 Жыл бұрын
@Cat.Daddy. Just because an author calls something "the fifth Veda" does not make a text part of the Vedic corpus. The Vedas were composed between 1800 BCE and 1200 BCE and consist of the Rig, Yajur, Sama, and Atharva and the oldest of each book is the Samhitas. The Vedic period ends after 1100 BCE or so. The Mahabharata is a post-Vedic text that began to be composed around 500 BCE.
@ms.annthrope4156 ай бұрын
I've read almoat all of Bart's books on Christianity. Extremely enlightening and scholarly. The story of Moses being floated down the Nile to be adopted by a princess has been told before in Sargon of Akkad. So like the story of the flood, the story of Moses has roots in nearby civilizations. The ancient Egyptians were copious writers. They documented everything. The amount of grain harvested year to year, the amount of wheat harvested, the amount of beer made, we have even found graffiti on the walls of the pyramids. But not one mention of the Hebrew slaves. Not one word about the 10 plagues. Especially thr death of thr first male born. That meant every family had lost a father, a son, a brother, an uncle all in one night yet not one person wrote down "WTF! Someone died in every family last night! It was all first born males!" Not one person wrote about the hundreds of thousands of Hebrews who left Egypt. Hundreds of thousands of people more than thr entire population of thr Levant, yet not one shred of archeological evidence of where they lived. It takes a huge amount of food and resources to feed so many people jd they leave a lot of trash. Not one piece of solid evidence. The Pharoah's entire army drowned in the Red Sea, or thr Sea of Reeds, so every family lost a family member in the army. Not one mention of it.
@geraldmeehan89422 жыл бұрын
Dt. Bart Ehrman is so knowledgable and quite entertaining as well, keep up the good work, Derek
@etzelkaplan96772 жыл бұрын
misquoting Jesus lead me to leave bible for quran
@walterhartwellwhite80222 жыл бұрын
@@etzelkaplan9677 okay
@etzelkaplan96772 жыл бұрын
@@walterhartwellwhite8022 thanks
@dorandacolbert59732 жыл бұрын
Being the last of the prophets,Don't the Muslims have proof that Moses existed, or did they just go by the Jews story?
@mtcemngr52922 жыл бұрын
@@dorandacolbert5973-- Quranic history rather.
@dairyqueue2 жыл бұрын
This is quite an interesting topic for me at the moment. I'm quite glad to see bart ehrman here covering it.
@gardenseden82642 жыл бұрын
I listened 3 times. Or tried to. Did he answer the question at hand? What was his answer?
@silveriorebelo80452 жыл бұрын
Bart is a bigoted anti-Christian - not very reliable - he often comes across as totally manipulative . while seemingly trying in some mesure to be objective
@hermosocortado7187 Жыл бұрын
The life of Moses is like a mosaic art,put the pieces together and tell a story
@DontDrinkthatstuff Жыл бұрын
It's also propaganda
@riveratrackrunner11 ай бұрын
👌🏽
@GnosticInformant2 жыл бұрын
Bart is the man! I'm going to be at this course!
@cheryldeboissiere18512 жыл бұрын
Error-man is not a qualified archaeologist but it has never stopped. He’s actually the dean of (eels) a Bible college who pretends he’s an atheist.
@richNfit4life Жыл бұрын
@pineelblends8387Could you please say where exactly Dr. Bart Ehrman is wrong about what he teaches? It cannot be everything he says that’s wrong. Could you provide a couple examples of what he is wrong about and then share why it’s wrong? That would very helpful. Thanks.
@jerrycallender99272 жыл бұрын
As a child, I questioned, among many questions on the fairie tales we, as children, were commanded to believe under pain of being cast into a pit of fire, WHO it was that witnessed 'Moses' being placed into a basket and set adrift, followed the basket carrying 'Moses' all the way to Pharoah's daughter, observed 'Moses' growing up, committing murder, fleeing, marrying, returning and then spending 40 years to travel 200 miles and lived to write the biography.
@tonydimera2822 жыл бұрын
Who witnessed Alexander the great conquests dumbass?
@ProbableCauseBluesBand2 жыл бұрын
It was supernatural man, god did it!!! Ugh…..
@borthwrenblanston6632 Жыл бұрын
Religious fairy tales? Says the atheist fool that believes the human being came from a rock, that morality came from a mud puddle, that life can come from a warm pond. Son, we have billions of mud puddles, rocks & warm ponds. NONE OF THEM has ever produced anything NEW. You're atheist desperation is noted. SORRY KID, but it’s blatant stupidity (atheism) to think that star dust, moist rocks and mud puddles have the INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE AND MEANS to create/design LIFE, INTELLIGENCE, LOVE, CONSCIOUSNESS, MORALITY, the human being and ALL the co-existent bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in co-dependent order in the human body :) Atheism is pure idiocy. MOSES did in fact exist. I know you all are desperate to hold that Moses did not exist, but Jesus, Matthew, Mark, Dr. Luke & John all said Moses did exist concerning the “Mount of Transfiguration where Moses & Elijah appeared with Jesus in the New Testament: Mark 9:2-8, Matthew 17:1-27, Luke 9:28-36
@douglaswarrenheinz1629 Жыл бұрын
Moses and Jesus had the same ghost writer.
@PoeLemic2 жыл бұрын
THis sounds like a really great course. I'm glad that MVP made all of us aware of it. Yeah, I've wondered a lot about the history of Moses before, so glad a Course is devoted to it by BDE.
@jeffforsythe9514 Жыл бұрын
History says that Moses received God's message but really Moses as a god himself. People were not ready to understand back then that there are many gods in heaven....................falun dafa
@hemiolaguy Жыл бұрын
@@jeffforsythe9514 Polytheism was widely accepted in the ancient world -- in Babylon, Assyrian empire, Egypt, Greece, etc. etc.
@Demobius2 жыл бұрын
As a mythologist, I see Moses as a conflated culture hero, like Heracles. The Moses who committed murder and ran off to hide with the Kenites was not the same Moses who confronted Pharaoh, and not the same Moses who was inducted into the Midianite family priesthood by Jethro. I see a process similar to the melding of local Heracles legends into one character.
@bibleburner84262 жыл бұрын
Similar process for the construction of the Jesus myth as well.
@Demobius2 жыл бұрын
@@bibleburner8426 There are indications there was a collection of aphorisms circulated prior to Paul, who used them as a rough basis for his church. Twenty years later, "Mark" hung a narrative on the new religion. Where that story came from is unclear, though it seems to be a combination of Greek and Egyptian mythology in a Judaean setting.
@borthwrenblanston6632 Жыл бұрын
@@bibleburner8426 Judaism Christianity? A copy? No. The Calendar does not decide truth, and the eternal infinite Christ existed before any cult or man or demon G0D period. Apparently, what you don’t realize is that G0D was the first on the scene and then Satan. Since that moment, Satan has counterfeited G0D, KNOWING WHAT WAS COMING. And that’s why you have cults and cheap COPIES of the Bible exhibiting The Doctrine of Demons (cults such as atheism, evolution, abiogenesis, star formation, big bang). So it doesn’t matter “when” G0D was “counterfeited” as long as you understand G0D was here first and after Lucifer (Satan) was cast out of heaven, he started to counterfeit G0D’S aims from that point onward. "There is no scholar in any college or university in the western world who teaches classics, ancient history, new testament, early Christianity, any related field who doubts that Jesus existed.” - Bart Ehrman, New Testament ATHEIST scholar - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. MOSES did in fact exist. I know you all are desperate to hold that Moses did not exist, but Jesus, Matthew, Mark, Dr. Luke & John all said Moses did exist concerning the “Mount of Transfiguration where Moses & Elijah appeared with Jesus in the New Testament: Mark 9:2-8, Matthew 17:1-27, Luke 9:28-36
@Canaanitebabyeater Жыл бұрын
So like King Arthur, right?
@yussepig6629 Жыл бұрын
You’re no different than a religious fanatic , just believing what fits your world view
@uncleanunicorn4571 Жыл бұрын
The smoking gun for me is that no other culture is ever heard of moses, Even after allegedly leading two million people out of egypt to conquer the Levant.
@julianmarsh8384 Жыл бұрын
This site is so good....intellectual and educational....people with real knowledge and honest enough to admit even they don't know enough to give cast iron opinions...
@geico19752 жыл бұрын
So interesting, I love it when Bart said talking of ancient history, "we just don't know that much." I know it's hard to fathom time, like 10,000 years from now. Heck, they may be someone who claims the United States was just a myth, it never really was a nation. I mean, who's to say this place won't be obliterated in 3,000 years. After another 3,000 years everything destroyed and lost, and another 4,000 years passes and new people start building. Give them 100 years or so to really start populating, opening education, and another 300-500 years the folks around really have come along ways in their 500 year history and start fining ancient artifacts and study those for several generations, and on and on. How do we know anything:) HA!
@kirstencorby8465 Жыл бұрын
It amuses me to think that a thousand years from now, scholars will stake their reputations on interpretations of ragged scraps of Golden and Silver Age comic books.
@isashah53352 жыл бұрын
People may hungry for food but me for books.... i have not finished studies but to much i love to read and hear , histories and religions...
@professor_thunder2 жыл бұрын
@MythVision Podcast - A interview with Bart and Francesca Stavrakopoulou would be fun.
@tarhunta21112 жыл бұрын
I tell you what,I wouldn't mind interviewing Francesca.
@jahamilton9 ай бұрын
I'd suggest InspiringPhilosophys video on the Exodus and Moses. Very interesting with some good historical backing.
@Ayusisi2 жыл бұрын
This is not the course video itself, but already there are food for thought from Dr. Erhman. Thank you for this short video
@yt.euhnabil5 күн бұрын
😊
@yt.euhnabil5 күн бұрын
😊😊
@yt.euhnabil5 күн бұрын
😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
@carolstrickland616 Жыл бұрын
In the past few months I've read a few semi-scholarly works about Moses, coming from the same group of people. Before they go wack-a-doodle (to use the scientific term) toward the end of their books (and many of them do), they put up a good argument that Moses and his family were in some way closely related to Akhenaten (if not Akhenaten = Moses) and were also exiled from Egypt. One fellow said that Moses' people were incorporated into Israel as the Twelfth Tribe, and their backstory adjusted to fit Israel more comfortably. This puts Akhenaten, the first monotheist, as having had a heavy hand in influencing the Israeli pov. I like to think the Ten Plagues were memories of the eruption of Thera, and I've also seen studies where high prevailing winds swept most of the water out of some largish lake between Egypt and Israel, which has been witnessed many times in historical times, and might have been so remarkable so as to have been incorporated into this story.
@kirstencorby8465 Жыл бұрын
I've heard that Akhenaten idea as well.
@herbalgerbil Жыл бұрын
Perhaps that might explain why the Torah doesn't mention a specific Pharoah.
@DontDrinkthatstuff Жыл бұрын
@herbalgerbil Well, that or the story didn't actually happen, so of course they aren't going to mention an actual Pharaoh, lol. Then you could discredit the story.
@metalhead0274 Жыл бұрын
I have for some time now changed my way of responding to these questions of biblical characters existing. I used to just answer NO to most of the ones suggested when asked like this....did Moses exist... But I find that biblical believers are stubborn and hard headed about this type of topics and shut down and are not very responsive or open minded to continue discussing when they are just told NO. And then go on to say why.. They shut down and get defensive.. So I changed my tactics about a year or two ago. I no longer just say no.. I tell them that the biblical character narrative as portrayed in the bible ... That character never existed. This leaves them wiggle room to have curiosity as to what I mean and what I am talking about. I know there was no biblical character of a Moses...this character never existed.. not to any portion of the story narrative. Now grant it some version of some character or person may have existed at some point that some story narrative was taken from and expanded upon... I don't think we can prove or disprove that.. But I will challenge it when biblical apologists and believers want to assert specific and exact biblical characters that existed when we know for certain they did not.
@origenjerome8031 Жыл бұрын
The reason why believers are stubborn and closed-minded is because the alternative to non-belief is nihilism. If all these religious stuffs are just fictional make-believe fantasies, then that means human beings are nothing but just carbon-based organisms that after death, people will simply not exist anymore. Void for eternity of non-existence. It's a very depressing reality to live and think about it. You would rather stick with religion and make yourself happy.
@yussepig6629 Жыл бұрын
‘We know for certain’ …you sound ridiculous as much as the fanatics you claim superiority to.
@OmniphonProductions Жыл бұрын
I love the way, when faced with biblical contradictions...internal or external...Christians invent explanations that aren't supported by observable evidence, historical record, or the _Bible._ I love it even more when the explanations they invent to _rationalize_ contradictions in _one_ part of the Bible end up _creating more_ contradictions to _other_ parts of the Bible. As for Moses/Sargon, Noah/Gilgamesh, etc. - It's reasonable to conclude that oral tradition...as oral tradition does...kept old stories alive, while updating and modifying them over time. Finaly Note: Rather than, "Take it with a grain of salt," I would love to hear Dr. Ehrman...or an interviewer...present the pun, "Take it with a _pillar_ of salt."
@YvesDarbouze Жыл бұрын
I just wanted to say thank you for this channel. This work is so important. Thank you thank you thank you
@jerryjones72932 жыл бұрын
Dr. Ehrman is very credible in my opinion. He learned the classical languages of biblical literature and gained the academic credentials of theology. His critical thinking and objectivity are respectable.
@pantelimonqq2 жыл бұрын
And does not know about the sacred tradition of the jews and why Christ names another priest in the story of David and breads
@cheryldeboissiere18512 жыл бұрын
Error-man didn’t receive his degree at an accredited university, he graduated from a Bible college, taught at a Bible college, and is dean of a Bible college, pretends to be an atheist so his books can sell.
@borthwrenblanston6632 Жыл бұрын
@Fides Non Sequitur No, he admits he belief in his quote: "There is no scholar in any college or university in the western world who teaches classics, ancient history, new testament, early Christianity, any related field who doubts that Jesus existed.” - Bart Ehrman, New Testament ATHEIST scholar - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. MOSES did in fact exist. I know you all are desperate to hold that Moses did not exist, but Jesus, Matthew, Mark, Dr. Luke & John all said Moses did exist concerning the “Mount of Transfiguration where Moses & Elijah appeared with Jesus in the New Testament: Mark 9:2-8, Matthew 17:1-27, Luke 9:28-36
@eprd313 Жыл бұрын
@@borthwrenblanston6632they also believed Adam and Eve were real people. What you mentioned proves absolutely nothing.
@SteveHardie42 Жыл бұрын
We also know a worldwide Flood never happened, but all those "characters" believed in that, too.
@freelightexpress2 жыл бұрын
What do you think of D.M. Murdocks work before she passed, 'Did Moses exist? The myth of the Israelite Lawgiver'?
@jjjez2 жыл бұрын
I've read it. It's great. Much more decisively written and it pretty much blasts everything out of the water. No he didn't exist.
@markbeckens2 жыл бұрын
Yes, we was a center in the NBA in the late 70's and 80's and is a Hall of Fame player
@markbeckens2 жыл бұрын
And 90's
@joebloggs24732 жыл бұрын
They were goat herders. Understand that. Telling stories was a way of life.
@Fee___Ай бұрын
But did they tell those stories for kids to sleep or why did they find out fake storys?
@johncalvert724310 ай бұрын
Moses still exists. That is why Scripture reminds us that "We are compassed about by so great a cloud of witnesses." (Hebrews 12:1) Abraham exists too, and Jesus said that Abraham rejoiced to see His day. The question is; where will you exist when you're done here. Be careful not to blaspheme or you will be leaving us prematurely.
@LucBylemansАй бұрын
Well john, you should read the treaty of the great Seth, papyrus scrolls VII of the Nag Hammadi findings. Even Jezus claims, I didn´t die on the cross it was someone else, meaning the spirit is inmortal
@WalterRMattfeld2 жыл бұрын
Not many are aware that back in the 1920's scholars, in professional journals, were debating the finding of an ancient inscription at Serabit el Khadim whose name was MS or MS'S, some arguing this was Moses of Sinai fame. See my paper at ACADEMIA on the arguments (of the 1920s-2010).
@GabrielleSolange2 жыл бұрын
Do you have a link?
@jeffreylehman1159 Жыл бұрын
Did you not hear the part where Ehrman says that.Moses was an Egyptian name? So it means nothing unless you can show it was THAT Moses
@sandlotscout63589 ай бұрын
@@jeffreylehman1159where did Moses lead the Israelites from?
@jeffreylehman11599 ай бұрын
@@sandlotscout6358 Exodus never happened, it’s just a story.
@yoursoulisforever11 ай бұрын
Thank you for you program. It would be great IMHO to see a program on written accounts vs oral accounts. I think it would be hard to not be bias against oral accounts in this modern age, but perhaps written accounts are suspectable to corruption in ways that oral accounts are not, and vise versa.
@henryschmit33402 жыл бұрын
"And what does the consensus say." How many times in history has the 'consensus' been upended? In reality you shouldn't trust 'consensus' as far as you could kick it.
@rainbowkrampus2 жыл бұрын
Well, we rely on empiricism for reasons. Consensus is valuable and worth pursuing. It's just also a good idea to keep in mind the reliability of people in a given field.
@henryschmit33402 жыл бұрын
@@rainbowkrampus Sounds good, but as history shows, 'consensus' has also often been used as a means of deceiving and indocrinating people, e.g, the climate 'crisis'/global warming scam, the virus/vaccine disaster, the evolution hoax, and false reasons to go to war, etc.
@BasedKungFu2 жыл бұрын
When in history have they had access to the technology and resources we have today? Seems to me it's a lot easier to upend the historical consensus in the past when people were extremely limited when writing history.
@henryschmit33402 жыл бұрын
@@BasedKungFu With all the resources of today there are still so many false things that are taken as truth, such the ones I mentioned above.
@BasedKungFu2 жыл бұрын
@@henryschmit3340 I don't see any specific examples in this thread.
@integrationalpolytheism2 жыл бұрын
21:30 that’s an odd passing comment “it’s earlier stuff too including Genesis 1 and 2”? I am certain a scholar like Bart Ehrman has noticed that Genesis 1 (up to and includkng 2:4) is a different creation story from Genesis 2 and 3 (starting at Genesis 2:5). How can Genesis 1 and 2 be by the same author and how can Genesis 2 and 3 not be by the same author as each other? Was this a very weird slip of the tongue? It seems an odd and unlikely mistake to make.
@fordprefect53042 жыл бұрын
You are commenting about this? According to Genesis, in what order were the land animals, man, and women created? This “simple” question has two different answers. According to Genesis 1:24-27, God creates the land animals (vv. 24-25), and then man and woman (vv. 26-27). However, in Genesis 2:7, God creates man, and then in v. 19 creates animals, and in v. 22 creates woman. Thus, the commonly heard idea that Genesis 2 is an elaboration upon Genesis 1, filling in various details, does not work-the two accounts tell different stories. It amazes me how some scholars let them slip by them. Bart does a great job on teh NT but the OT *MEH*
@jasonjenkins78252 жыл бұрын
It was written in Alexandria, under Greek rule, having benefitted from Greek intellectual culture, in the shadow of Herodotus and Thucydides et al, and with a desire to produce a similar monument to themselves, probably occurring with the "translation" of the Septuagint. It demonstrates for a Greek readership an allegedly ancient Jewish relationship with the Egyptians (whom the Greeks revered) and, moreover, it serves as an example of how gentile rulers who treat the Jews poorly will face the murderous wrath of YHWH. It's not History. It's ethno-religious propaganda within a very specific historical context and power dynamic, with very particular aims.
@TheInterestedObserver2 жыл бұрын
this is the closest anyone on the thread has come.
@spacechecker4983 Жыл бұрын
The cut of your jib... I like it. Carry on sir.
@DontDrinkthatstuff Жыл бұрын
Very well said. Bart falls short many times because he fails to see the wider game being played and what the Torah/Bible actually was.
@davidwelch5186 Жыл бұрын
Moses needed a better navigator. 40 years to walk from Cairo to Jerusalem is about 1/4 mile a day
@blingcicero65702 жыл бұрын
Great question Derek. I noticed a big commonalities between Greek and Hebrew understanding. For example the Greek concept of miasma and blood guilt in the Hebrew Bible.
@anubis89182 жыл бұрын
Because the Greeks created the hebrews
@RafeCastillo Жыл бұрын
And the Egyptians created the Greeks.
@RafeCastillo Жыл бұрын
When Christian prayer ends with amen, they are referencing amen-ra
@kumailyar2 жыл бұрын
Most respected Dr Ehrman, we cannot thank you for what you have done. You are spreading and sharing your knowledge and information which will indeed change the views of generations. Like myself many Muslims are waiting when you will read and search Quran and then talk about it. 🌻 its always good to hear you 🌻
@keksi68442 жыл бұрын
Do not worship humans,him accepting or denying Islam has ZERO meaning.Allah does not use celebrities to promote Islam.
@hjeffwallace2 жыл бұрын
@@keksi6844 which part of Asif’s comment is worshiping a human? Are compliments or thanks prohibited?
@joygibbons54822 жыл бұрын
Oh no, you don’t want him to apply the same techniques to the Quran he applies to the Bible, he’ll demolish it!
@kumailyar2 жыл бұрын
@@joygibbons5482 Dear o dear, for more than 1400-years all the aniti-Quran-Muslim champions have lost their battles, we know no one can win against the greatest of All Allah tabarak wa ta'ala. This book is not found in mud, water or in caves it has been revealed by God to his Messenger, like other scriptures before it. Joy, did you ever read Quran ? if not you cannot get it. Thanks for your comments. Rgds
@kumailyar2 жыл бұрын
@@joygibbons5482 BTW, did you read the Bible, if yes which version ? KJV or NIV ?
@braydenmiller80212 жыл бұрын
I’ve been curious about this!
@guttmech Жыл бұрын
How far back in jewish history do you think is true and not fabricated? moses joshua samson king david soloman etc?
@Iknowknow1122 жыл бұрын
Cyrus Gordon wrote the book THE COMMON BACKGROUND OF GREEK AND HEBREW CIVILIZATIONS in 1965 in which he uncovers numerous linguist and mythic links between the two.
@sharonhearne5014 Жыл бұрын
One detail which blows me away is how sketchy is Biblical history with ‘who was Moses’ as simply one example. When I attended Baylor University and their required Religion class I was taught that many of these early religious key figures may have been prefigured in stories taken from earlier Babylonian, etc., tales and great flood and creation stories. Raised as a Fundamentalist Christian child I was taught that you cannot question the veracity of Biblical truth by giving any credence to these earlier “folk” tales even if these stories seem related.
@eeeqqq7582 Жыл бұрын
Same teaching in Islam about Judaic and Christian sources.
@gerhardusvanderpoll Жыл бұрын
The existence of soda water proves that Moses did exist:"And Moses hitta the rock,and SO DA water came forth"
@RaysDad Жыл бұрын
I recommend Prof. Ehrman's The Triumph of Christianity. It helped me understand how Christianity spread during the first few centuries.
@annalisette58972 жыл бұрын
Maybe Moses and the Exodus come from various tales involving various people. Considering the closeness, wars and interactions between Egypt and Palestine, I'd assume there was multiple immigration and emigration. The Exodus story had a level of violence and we know wars were fought up and down those lands. Further, I cannot think that the biblical plagues were anything other than what happened when Santorini blew up, but scholars keep insisting the Exodus happened a few hundred years later. Whatever happened when Santorini exploded. many people in the area would have had experiences of biblical proportions.
@re62352 жыл бұрын
@kristina zboodramPhilistines came before Israelites lmao, read the Bible! We know Israelites were there because of the Bible, Philistines are one of Canaanites tribes, they are native of the land didn't Israelites fought Philistines to get that land to begin with, I don't think ever happened Philistines and Israelites are the same group of people in the beginning but after 2000 years conflict happened different minds etc. Canaanites=Arabs, Phoenicians, Assyrians, Israelites etc basically natives of middle east. In reality Israelites are part of Canaanites as well, Israelites are one of Canaanites tribes.
@mischr132 жыл бұрын
@@re6235 right lol even according to their own version of the story the philistines were there first
@cheryldeboissiere18512 жыл бұрын
Simcha Jacobvici has done a whole video on Moses moving events to the destruction of Santorini. Unlike Error-man, he actually went to sites that support. Unlike Error-man, Simcha does not claim to be a biblical scholar. Simcha is an investigative journalist unlike Error-man who is a Bible College hack, who makes up theories and pretends to be an expert.
@borthwrenblanston6632 Жыл бұрын
Jesus is real: "There is no scholar in any college or university in the western world who teaches classics, ancient history, new testament, early Christianity, any related field who doubts that Jesus existed.” - Bart Ehrman, New Testament ATHEIST scholar - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill MOSES did in fact exist. I know you all are desperate to hold that Moses did not exist, but Jesus, Matthew, Mark, Dr. Luke & John all said Moses did exist concerning the “Mount of Transfiguration where Moses & Elijah appeared with Jesus in the New Testament: Mark 9:2-8, Matthew 17:1-27, Luke 9:28-36 Try to learn.
@stevekovoc39394 ай бұрын
I think that the Moses story is very loosely based on the whole Hyksos episode of Egyptian history, much like how the Iliad and Odyssey are loosely based on some actual event.
@Wei.X.Confucius Жыл бұрын
There was a ancient Chinese philosopher and prophet like Moses, he was called Mozi. He delivered the same message from God to the people.
@tjorven964511 ай бұрын
Only he lived long after Moses in c. 470 - c. 391 BCE
@t687m3 Жыл бұрын
Commercial interruption at 1:22 in the middle of a sentence. Very rude KZbin.
@selfish-perverse-n-turbulent2 жыл бұрын
The fact that Moses was named Moses, an Egyptian name, is unremarkable. It is the type of thing that an author of fiction must do at the bare minimum. He was named by an Egyptian pharaoh, according to the story, and had to blend in as an Egyptian throughout his early life. His name, therefore, doesn't make the story more historically credible.
@origenjerome80312 жыл бұрын
Biggest question is - Are you doing post-production work on your audio? The sound is great on my pair of JBL headphones. The voice is deep, yet clear and very majestic sound effects... like God talking. What microphone are you using?
@lunarmodule64192 жыл бұрын
And Santa is real too!
@342crazy6662 жыл бұрын
Santa has nothing to do with moses
@lunarmodule64192 жыл бұрын
@@342crazy666 The long beard!
@danlopez.3592 Жыл бұрын
Throw Socrates in there
@Tmanaz48011 ай бұрын
In this age of "influencers" competing to see who can be more confident and forceful, Bart's humble, friendly tone is refreshing.
@handstandish2 жыл бұрын
Love the laugh Bart. Great opener there.
@merrybolton21352 жыл бұрын
The Jews were said to have gone around the Sini dessert for forty years // I have walked across it in 4 days ???????????????????
@joecaner2 жыл бұрын
Did Luke Skywalker exist? Did Fred Flintstone exist? Did Cap'n Crunch exist?
@JaceDeanLove2 жыл бұрын
Your sarcastic approach tells me no, which breaks my heart. Fred isn't real?!
@reinercelsus82992 жыл бұрын
If Fred Flintstone didn't really exist, how was it possible then that Barney Rubble was his reliable eyewitness?
@moonshoes112 жыл бұрын
And The Lord said unto Luke; Obi-wan never told you what happened to your father….
@God_Is_An_Atheist2 жыл бұрын
@@moonshoes11 I am thy father!
@payt012 жыл бұрын
Ok.. point taken.. but how about Mickey Mouse? Surely he does exist right? ... Right?
@chegadesuade10 ай бұрын
I'm looking forward to watching this interview. I hope the interviewer asked Bart about the possibility of Moses being a character based on Cyrus the Great, I had a college professor who thought it was likely true.
@Сампатх72926 ай бұрын
Another theory says cyrus is a fictional character created by moses.
@samuelpope77982 жыл бұрын
Every character in the Bible is a fictional character from the talking snake to the talking donkey even the characters that were based on real historic people are fictional. Sort of like when you see the president of the US portrayed in a movie. The author wrote that dialog for the character to help tell a story.
@osgrace33412 жыл бұрын
Except you can’t back that claim up😂
@borthwrenblanston6632 Жыл бұрын
No. The Calendar does not decide truth, and the eternal infinite Christ existed before any cult or man or demon G0D period. Apparently, what you don’t realize is that G0D was the first on the scene and then Satan. Since that moment, Satan has counterfeited G0D, KNOWING WHAT WAS COMING. And that’s why you have cults and cheap COPIES of the Bible exhibiting The Doctrine of Demons (cults such as atheism, evolution, abiogenesis, star formation, big bang). So it doesn’t matter “when” G0D was “counterfeited” as long as you understand G0D was here first and after Lucifer (Satan) was cast out of heaven, he started to counterfeit G0D’S aims from that point onward. "There is no scholar in any college or university in the western world who teaches classics, ancient history, new testament, early Christianity, any related field who doubts that Jesus existed.” - Bart Ehrman, New Testament ATHEIST scholar - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. MOSES did in fact exist. I know you all are desperate to hold that Moses did not exist, but Jesus, Matthew, Mark, Dr. Luke & John all said Moses did exist concerning the “Mount of Transfiguration where Moses & Elijah appeared with Jesus in the New Testament: Mark 9:2-8, Matthew 17:1-27, Luke 9:28-36
@LifeJourney-qp2bc Жыл бұрын
@@osgrace3341 😂😂😂😂
@Zottyworld Жыл бұрын
@@osgrace3341the Bible is 100% plagerized and the story of Moses is actually the story of Gilgamesh 🗣️🦾
@dreamscapesflstudiomobile Жыл бұрын
Yep. I'd like to see anyone try to prove it either way. A book written by Man j8st tells it was written by man. Until God speaks to me directly and proves these "fictional tales" I will always ask for proof.
@RafeCastillo Жыл бұрын
For those unfamiliar with literary criticism, I recommend Dinkler’s “Literary Theory and the New Testament” (Yale Press).
@Dr.Bitterbrains3332 жыл бұрын
He should write a book on this
@skepticalCoder2 жыл бұрын
Fantastic episode.
@MrArdytube2 жыл бұрын
I was watching a video on the Sumerians… I was surprised to learn that the the first writing (cuneiform) only emerged around 4000 BCE … which seems to be several thousands of years after the proposed earliest events of the Bible. So, obviously, those early events could not have been written down… Just a bit of context that never previously occurred to me
@borthwrenblanston6632 Жыл бұрын
MOSES did in fact exist. I know you all are desperate to hold that Moses did not exist, but Jesus, Matthew, Mark, Dr. Luke & John all said Moses did exist concerning the “Mount of Transfiguration where Moses & Elijah appeared with Jesus in the New Testament: Mark 9:2-8, Matthew 17:1-27, Luke 9:28-36 Judaism Christianity? A copy? No. The Calendar does not decide truth, and the eternal infinite Christ existed before any cult or man or demon G0D period. Apparently, what you don’t realize is that G0D was the first on the scene and then Satan. Since that moment, Satan has counterfeited G0D, KNOWING WHAT WAS COMING. And that’s why you have cults and cheap COPIES of the Bible exhibiting The Doctrine of Demons (cults such as atheism, evolution, abiogenesis, star formation, big bang). So it doesn’t matter “when” G0D was “counterfeited” as long as you understand G0D was here first and after Lucifer (Satan) was cast out of heaven, he started to counterfeit G0D’S aims from that point onward. "There is no scholar in any college or university in the western world who teaches classics, ancient history, new testament, early Christianity, any related field who doubts that Jesus existed.” - Bart Ehrman, New Testament ATHEIST scholar - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
@jungJH1 Жыл бұрын
@@borthwrenblanston6632 so where is the source?
@DontDrinkthatstuff Жыл бұрын
@@borthwrenblanston6632Delusional
@thirstingknowledge2 ай бұрын
Moses lived if he did, 1000 yrs before Jesus. Buddha 500 yrs.
@ΕλέησονΑμαρτωλόν Жыл бұрын
Sextus Julius Africanus had an interesting citation regarding Moses. Can’t recall exact citation though. Πάντοτε χαίρετε.
@Bromiios2 жыл бұрын
You and Gnostic rock
@kenmcclellan6 ай бұрын
If we assume that the first two books of the Torah were a rip of earlier literature done in the 3rd Century BC, based largely on Berossus for Genesis and Manetho for Exodus, then the clear answer is YES. Manetho says he was an Osirian priest who took a different name when he led people out of Avaris for Jerusalem. Makes fascinating reading. Especially the part about the Hebrews having been 'slaves' in Egypt for four centuries ... when the shepherd kings had ruled Egypt in the 15th to sometime in the 18th dynasties.
@robin358687 Жыл бұрын
It’s the same story in Hindu mythology about the birth of Krishna, who was born to a virgin and was God , his parents were of menial means. Sometimes I wonder the names Christ and Krishna sound similar.
@thirstingknowledge2 ай бұрын
Constantine and Pau; created this myth. Taking from Dyonisius, Krishna and Persian Avatar which were worshipped by the Roman Senate at that time and incorporated as Christianity where Jesus was a prophet, teache, healer and a Gnostic.
@LucBylemansАй бұрын
Hey robin, maybe search Krishna in wikipeadia, he was the " " avatar of another socalled god and so on?
@Jim-g4k Жыл бұрын
So my question would. Is there any historical evidence behind moses
@drlegendre2 жыл бұрын
Where and when did the belief in Mosiac authorship originate? I don't believe this comes from the text itself, does it?
@jacksonaaron1030842 жыл бұрын
No it seems around the Macaabees era
@zekdom2 жыл бұрын
It’s within the text itself. Deuteronomy 31:9 and 31:24
@jacksonaaron1030842 жыл бұрын
@@zekdom we don't believe that and the evidence isn't strong for it's support.
@drlegendre2 жыл бұрын
@@zekdom A quick read of Deut 31 indicates that Moses "wrote down" some portion(s) of the law. There is no indication that he authored the whole of the pentateuch.
@cinaedmacseamas29786 ай бұрын
"People making sense of their own past..." is how we should regard the Pentateuch. Unfortunately, we have a lot of cultural and institutional inertia which regards it as absolute truth, and therefore it is true as a telling of history too.
@PBAmygdala20212 жыл бұрын
On this topic, I highly recommend reading Berossus and Genesis, Manetho and Exodus, by Russell Gmirkin. There is no archeological evidence for the Pentachuch before it appears translated into Greek (the Septuigent or LXX) around 270 BC. Gmirkin shows that the Pentachuch derived from Greek sources in the library of Alexandria and was most likely composed between 273 and 273 BC.
@borthwrenblanston6632 Жыл бұрын
Judaism Christianity? A copy? No. The Calendar does not decide truth, and the eternal infinite Christ existed before any cult or man or demon G0D period. Apparently, what you don’t realize is that G0D was the first on the scene and then Satan. Since that moment, Satan has counterfeited G0D, KNOWING WHAT WAS COMING. And that’s why you have cults and cheap COPIES of the Bible exhibiting The Doctrine of Demons (cults such as atheism, evolution, abiogenesis, star formation, big bang). So it doesn’t matter “when” G0D was “counterfeited” as long as you understand G0D was here first and after Lucifer (Satan) was cast out of heaven, he started to counterfeit G0D’S aims from that point onward. "There is no scholar in any college or university in the western world who teaches classics, ancient history, new testament, early Christianity, any related field who doubts that Jesus existed.” - Bart Ehrman, New Testament ATHEIST scholar - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. MOSES did in fact exist. I know you all are desperate to hold that Moses did not exist, but Jesus, Matthew, Mark, Dr. Luke & John all said Moses did exist concerning the “Mount of Transfiguration where Moses & Elijah appeared with Jesus in the New Testament: Mark 9:2-8, Matthew 17:1-27, Luke 9:28-36
@ExJWCriticalThinker2 жыл бұрын
Man always a great program JT and Lady c
@sidjay76442 жыл бұрын
Two thousand years from now people would make Dan Brown's da vinci code novel part of their bible and call it Da Vinci (naturally)
@travelsouthafrica50482 жыл бұрын
you have serious misconception about how we decide what goes in the Bible and not , unlike what you believe , it's not plucked from thin air and there are various ways we can tell the fakes from the authentic kzbin.info/www/bejne/gaXIqohorZKkhrc and then there are the other hidden words within words kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJ7Rhp6EiZponbc
@ganuv2 жыл бұрын
Na Buddy da Vinci code doesn’t have code of morality and future event prophecies so stop talking stupidity just because you want to justify your lifestyle
@WalterRMattfeld2 жыл бұрын
So, here's the procedures I employed to identify Moses: (1) SEARCH FOR ARTFACTS IN THE SINAI TO LINK THE BIBLICAL ACCOUNTS TO. (2) IGNORE CLAIMS THERE ARE NO SUCH ARTIFACTS, INSTEAD, ASSUME REAL EVENTS ARE EMBEDDED IN THE FICTIONAL BIBLICAL STORY. (3) ASSUME THAT THE SINAI ARTIFACTUAL EVIDENCE HAD BEEN MISINTERPRETED or MISUNDERSTOOD BY THE BIBLICAL AUTHORS BEFORE THE BIBLE HAD WRITTEN. (4) OFFER AN EXPLANATION FOR WHY THE ARTIFACTS WERE MISINTERPRETED BY THE BIBLICAL AUTHORS As regards Moses (Moshe), the British Egyptologist, Professor Kenneth A. Kitchen, understands Moses is NOT derived from an Egyptian name, noting the Bible claims it derives from Hebrew, claiming "to draw out" of he water by Pharaoh's daughter as a baby in a reed basket.(Exodus 2:1-10) Kitchen (p297. On the Reliability of the Old Testament. 2003) "The name of Moses is most likely not Egyptian in the first place! The sibilants do not match as they should, and this cannot be explained away...It is better to admit the child was named (Ex 2:10) by his own mother, in a form originally vocalized Mashu, "one drawn out" (which became Mashe, "he who draws out, i.e., " he who draws out his people from slavery..." Some scholars claim Moses exists as an Egyptian name, like Thothmoses or Ahmoses. CONTRA Professor Kitchen, I have determined Moses is derived from an Egyptian title: imy-r ms`, (commander of the expedition/army): "For most of pharaonic times, the overall controller of the expedition usually held the titlr sd 3wtyntr (god's treasurer) although the less specific rank of imy-r ms` Commander of the expedition/Army is also sometimes used..." (p.103. Vol. 3. Donald B. Redford, editor. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. 2001) It is my proposal that events and artifacts associated with the Egyptian mines at Serabit el Khadim, are behind the Exodus account. I suspect the Egyptian ming Expedition's leader, imyr ms, was called MS by his men. If I am right, we have WHY there is a MOSES in the Sinai at a mount Sinai, associated with Midianite miners. The Egyptiian miners are working with ASiatics for copper and turquoise, and under the charge of as Commander of the expedition/Army. Moses is portrayed as commander of an Israelite army of 600,000 armed men in the Exodus, at Mt. Sinai. So Commander MS` is what is behind Moses at Mt. Sinai. Moses asks Midianite minersto lead Israel from Mt. Sinai to Kadesh Barnea this would recall Midianites workinng Sinai mines with Egyptian overlords. Metala is cast for Israel's Tabernacle tent at Mt. Sinai and metalurgy was in engaged in at Serabit el Khadem, crucibles being found for copper extraction, whereas Turquiose as a semi precious stone, recalls the ephod vest made for Aaron. So, WHAT'S BEHIND ISRAEL'S WORSHIP OF THE GOLDEN CALF? An Egyptian shrine existed at SErabit el KHadim, honoring the Egyptian patroness of miners called Hat-Hor. She appears in several foroms. As a cow, and as awoman with cow horns or cow ears. Her devotees honored her with naked, noisey drunkeen song and dance to emulate her. Probably the Asiatic miners joined their Egyptian counterparts in so honoring her, recast in the Bible as Israel honoring the Golden Calf with naked drunken song and dance. SO WHAT IS BEHIND MOSES THROWING DOWN THE TEN COMMANDMENTS AT THE FOOT OF MT SINAI? Archaeologists found at theFOOT of mounts near Hat-Hor's shrine, shattered tables of stone bearing Proto-Sinatic inscriptions, They were composed of prayers addressed to the miner's gods, Egyptian and Asiatic , to protect them and help find veins of copper and turquiose. These stone slabs had originally been chiseled into the living rock near mine entrances, erosion caused them to separate and fall into rock scree at the FOOT OF THE MOUNTS. I understand these shattered stone tablets were recast in the Bible as Moses hurling down the Ten Commandments upon witnessing Israel's song and dance in honor of the Golden Calf. However, Egyptian myth does NOT understand Hat-Hor is the Golden Calf, she is the MOTHER of the Golden Calf, conceived of in tomb art as a male calf standing on a small boat, carrying the sun at sunrise as a Golden Calf. Old Kingdom Pyramid Texts,, Dynasty 6, Pharaoh Pepi, has him exclaim: "O Horus do not leave me boatless, for I am a GOLDEN CALF, born of Heaven." (Hat-Hor was Heaven). So, dear reader, there you have the artifacts in the Sinai, reveal what is behind the Biblical account of Calf worship, and shattered Ten Commandments at a mount's foot. Behind the Fictional Exodus account lies REAL HISTORY, documented with archaeological artifacts, misuderstood by Israel's ancestors, they held in their hands these artifacts: shattered stone tablets at a mount's foot, traditions of song and dance in Hat-Hor's honor by Egyptian and Asiatic miners. Today one can still behold the shattered images of Hat-Hor in the form of a lovely young woman with cow horns, sun disk and cow ears, suckling the Golden Calf in the form of a Pharaoh, who, in Old Kingdom inscriptions becomes the GOLDEN CALF as the sun at sun rise. Just think, all of us have seen a sunrise unaware to an Egyptian it is the Golden Calf being admired. Finally, I understand BEHIND a Moshe/Moses in the Sinai is an Egyptian title for ANY GIVEN LEADER OF AN EGYPTIAN MINIING EXPEDITION/Army AT ANY GIVEN PERIOD OF TIME, but as I understand the Hyksos Expulsion of 1530 BC is behind the Exodus, it would be an MS` of the 18th Dynasty. Regards, Walter R. Mattfeld
@ricardomachado67922 жыл бұрын
That's interesting cause there is a Pharaoh called Amon-sé that sounds like Moses , and is said that this Pharaoh opened the Nilo River to find his fiance's ring. Can you see the similarities?
@stevenv64632 жыл бұрын
No Moses means child so Ramses is Ra + Moses, child or son of Ra so it is kind of shocking to have Moses without a name of a god attached.
@Marine_Veteran_Vegan_Gamer2 жыл бұрын
Love Dr. Bart. He's always like, "eat my shorts" when creationist wave their "for the Bible tells me so" flag.
@borthwrenblanston6632 Жыл бұрын
"The Bible tells me so?" Says the lost and clueless atheist fool that thinks star dust, moist rocks and mud puddles have the INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE AND MEANS to create/design LIFE, INTELLIGENCE, LOVE, CONSCIOUSNESS, MORALITY, the human being and ALL the co-existent bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in co-dependent order in the human body :) Atheism is pure idiocy. The religious cult of atheism is INFAMOUS the world over for having ZERO ANSWERS. That's because atheism RUNS from "reality." I would add that as an atheist, you're bankrupt of RATIONAL/POSSIBLE causes for life, intelligence, consciousness, morality and ALL the co-existent bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in co-dependent order in the human body. Atheism has no RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step by step atheist explanation for reality. That’s because there isn’t one. THINK ABOUT what you’re getting into w/ the cult of atheism. GET OUT NOW. I’ll help you find truth. Atheism has none.
@manuaiipondraken83768 ай бұрын
Keep on trying guys. You are doing a great job and good luck.
@RileyRampant2 жыл бұрын
It could be that during the Babylonian captivity, the Jews could have become familiar with the Sumerian/Mesopotamian Myths generally. Being right on the Med, they would have been in the cultural current of all the empires trading on the sea.
@borthwrenblanston6632 Жыл бұрын
"There is no scholar in any college or university in the western world who teaches classics, ancient history, new testament, early Christianity, any related field who doubts that Jesus existed.” - Bart Ehrman, New Testament ATHEIST scholar - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill MOSES did in fact exist. I know you all are desperate to hold that Moses did not exist, but Jesus, Matthew, Mark, Dr. Luke & John all said Moses did exist concerning the “Mount of Transfiguration where Moses & Elijah appeared with Jesus in the New Testament: Mark 9:2-8, Matthew 17:1-27, Luke 9:28-36
@RileyRampant Жыл бұрын
@@borthwrenblanston6632 You have no idea if in fact Moses existed, or is a dim reflection of many centuries-long collated myths/narratives. You have a conviction-laden opinion, are entitled to it - but not to propound it as established fact, because it is not. Nor is it likely to be - imagine the telephone game going on for 800 years before someone gets it down on paper.
@katew.9402 Жыл бұрын
Great interview, thanks!
@TheInterestedObserver2 жыл бұрын
A really good BS-ometer for any story are a few things. 1. Do miracles happen before, during or after the events to facilitate the story? 2. Are there conversations with an unseen, intangible deity? 3. Is there zero evidence? Run this filter through your favorite myths, legends and Bible stories to get your answer / clonclusion.
@tonywolfe95132 жыл бұрын
1. Unless miracles have and do happen. 2. Unless there was/is an unseen, intangible deity who made Himself seen and tangible in the flesh. 3. Unless faith is itself the evidence.
@TheInterestedObserver2 жыл бұрын
@@tonywolfe9513 1. Evidence please. 2. Evidence please. 3. Faith literally means belief despite the absence of evidence so no it too is not evidence. You failed all three steps of the BS-ometer
@tonywolfe95132 жыл бұрын
@@TheInterestedObserver you wouldn’t accept my evidence, just as I won’t accept yours about your various world views. And here we are. God bless.
@TheInterestedObserver2 жыл бұрын
@@tonywolfe9513 you did not offer any evidence though, you offered faith, which is literally defined as belief lacking evidence, so that cannot be submitted as evidence, I hope that is not too much mental gymnastics to get around.
@tonywolfe95132 жыл бұрын
@@TheInterestedObserver I’m assuming you’re a materialist. If that’s true, then metaphysical thinking is beyond your purview. I don’t require proof from my wife and my children of their love in order for me to love them, and, even at times, with evidence to the contrary, I believe they love me and I love them. Some things are not tactile. That’s the differentiation between a human and an ape as far as I can tell.
@antoineduchamp49312 жыл бұрын
I am reluctant to say this, but amongst today's young people, without a specifically religious training and background, whether Moses existed or not is a matter of utter indifference to them.
@jonathonjubb66262 жыл бұрын
Silly question, thought that this is well known by now...
@rainbowkrampus2 жыл бұрын
Many of the things you take as common knowledge are unknown to others. Many of the things I take as common knowledge are unknown to you. What we as individuals don't know could fill a universe. Try not to let your assumptions blind you to this.
@jonathonjubb66262 жыл бұрын
@@rainbowkrampus Here in UK we call that 'stating the bleedin' obvious '... Got any archeological evidence? Did the very well researched Egyptians write about it?
@rainbowkrampus2 жыл бұрын
@@jonathonjubb6626 At what point did it appear to you that I was attempting to defend the existence of Moses?
@rtee408611 ай бұрын
The Egyptians usually write down and record everything, Why is there no Egyptian writings of the Hebrews living in Egypt as slaves ?
@stantorren440012 күн бұрын
It didn’t happen.
@mxr5722 жыл бұрын
Moses goes up Mt. Sinai to get the Tablets. it is green and lush there unlike the desert. he asks God if he could build a hospital. (first Mt. Sinai) God replies; take two Tablets and call me in the morning.
@jedsithor2 жыл бұрын
Maybe I've got this wrong, I'm going from memory (which isn't reliable as Dr. Ehrman has written about), but I remember reading about a lot about the origins of cultures and religions and that with regard to the origins of Judaism, pre-Babylonian exile, the culture you might call the Israelites were polytheists. They emerged in Canaan and Yahweh, far from being the one true god, was just one in a pantheon of gods that included the likes of Asherah, Ba'al and El, the latter of whom was the Zeus equivalent. The different city states and kingdoms in Canaan would have their own patron god and Yahweh was the patron of the kingdom of Israel but that didn't mean the other gods didn't exist or weren't to be worshipped. Athena is the patron god of Athens but the Athenians didn't outright ignore the other gods. But as time went on, Yahweh became more and more important. One of the theories is that the Babylonian exile really brought home the idea of holding on to their own culture and a concerted effort was made to drive home the idea that for the exiles, Yahweh was the only god they should worship and eventually, the only god that exists. Yahweh took on the properties of the other gods, particularly El (from which we derive Elohim - my god) and it's during this time that Genesis and particularly Exodus were put together as foundational myths for what became Judaism and post-exile the monotheistic view really took hold. It wasn't a complete shift though. The goddess Asherah, who in the old Canaanite pantheon had often been seen as the consort to El (and Ba'al in some stories i believe) became the consort to Yahweh and for a long time she was worshipped and revered, particularly in the home among women, even though it was frowned upon. I believe there's even evidence of little statues to Asherah being found in homes that date to within a century or two prior to the birth of Jesus. So monotheism took quite a while to fully take hold. How does this relate to the story of Moses? Well, the story may have existed pre-exile but it took a long time for it to truly become the basis of what we now call Judaism. Writing the story down might have actually served as a kind of marketing campaign by the priests of Yahweh to try to get people to stop worshipping the other gods. What's really interesting though is that Yahweh himself doesn't appear to be an original Canaanite god. While there is no evidence whatsoever that the Hebrews were ever slaves in Egypt (in fact Egyptian Pharaohs actually employed Egyptian citizens for their great works and paid them), Yahweh himself might have originated from Egypt or the surrounding area.
@dreamscapesflstudiomobile Жыл бұрын
Just 1 argument with your statement. Elohim is a plural so how can it mean My God. It simply means gods
@jedsithor Жыл бұрын
@@dreamscapesflstudiomobile So that's kinda complicated. You're right, it means "gods" but in the Biblical context, Elohim is used in the Jewish Bible as a singular when referring to God. It doesn't mean "my god," you're right about that. I don't know why I made that mistake. Maybe it was the subtitles in Passion Of The Christ or something lol In general terms, elohim is a word used to refer to the gods but is used specifically in the Bible to refer to the Jewish god.
@reinercelsus82992 жыл бұрын
Check out Ahmose a.k.a. Jah- Moses. He had actually defeated a pharaoh (the last Hyksos), freed his people and led them from the desert into a promised land (the reunited New Kingdom), restored and reformed their religion, brought a new law, claimed Amen "the Father" himself had spoken to him and punished his enemies, made Amen the new most high god of the egyptian state religion, no other gods to be worshipped before him. The last walls of the historical Jericho were destroyed not long before Ahmose sieged and eventually destroyed the last Hyksos in Canaan.
@borthwrenblanston6632 Жыл бұрын
Judaism Christianity? A copy? No. The Calendar does not decide truth, and the eternal infinite Christ existed before any cult or man or demon G0D period. Apparently, what you don’t realize is that G0D was the first on the scene and then Satan. Since that moment, Satan has counterfeited G0D, KNOWING WHAT WAS COMING. And that’s why you have cults and cheap COPIES of the Bible exhibiting The Doctrine of Demons (cults such as atheism, evolution, abiogenesis, star formation, big bang). So it doesn’t matter “when” G0D was “counterfeited” as long as you understand G0D was here first and after Lucifer (Satan) was cast out of heaven, he started to counterfeit G0D’S aims from that point onward.
@گونجنیوزٹیوی Жыл бұрын
could you make a video podcast about jacob and zulekha of Egbt¿
@davidfrisken16172 жыл бұрын
Nice sneaking Dennis in, who bart refuses to acknowledge.
@worldview73010 ай бұрын
As far as I can see, it seems like a case of the "He Said, She Said" blues Who was there at that time & who can trust (Absolutely) what was supposedly said?
@matthewvicendese18962 жыл бұрын
Tuthmosis was an Egyptian prince around the time the Volcano that destroyed Crete exploded. However, there is no way the exodus happened.
@georgialenny62652 жыл бұрын
@@pedrosaborido9648 I have come across this. It makes sense to me. The exodus was greatly exaggerated. It was a small group of people that left.
@georgialenny62652 жыл бұрын
@@pedrosaborido9648 makes perfect sense!
@fordprefect53042 жыл бұрын
@@pedrosaborido9648 We know how Israel and Judah were born. After the Bronze Age collapse and the withdrawal of Egypt from Canaan between 1150 and 1126BCE the Hebrew tribes that were living in the highlands migrated to the plains.
@fepeerreview31502 жыл бұрын
@@pedrosaborido9648 Thutmose (also rendered Thutmoses, Thutmosis, Tuthmose, Tutmosis, Thothmes, Tuthmosis, Djhutmose, etc.) is an Anglicization of the Ancient Egyptian personal name dhwty-ms, usually translated as "Born of the god Thoth". (Thank you, Wikipedia.) Ancient Egyptian script has no vowels. Consequently we don't actually KNOW what vowel sounds they used. Something can be inferred from related languages. But not a lot. In the case of Thutmes, the important or specific part of that name is Thoth. The "mes" simply indicates "born of" and could be appended to many other names. So "Moses" is kind of a bizarre name. It's like saying "son of" without giving the name of the parent. Maybe that was the idea. Maybe Jews of that time would have understood that and seen it as pointing toward the mystery of his birth. "Moses" ... "born of" ... whom?
@TheInterestedObserver2 жыл бұрын
@@fepeerreview3150 it's absolute fantasy and the writers of the books deliberately just called him moses precisely because he could not be found in the recorded history if he was properly named. So keep it nice and vague like all novelists do and make out that this half a title is actually a name.
@gregmonks Жыл бұрын
The consensus is worthless. The only thing that matters is that the content of the moses yarn was popular at the time across a wide area and over several centuries. Tracking where the yarn originated is rather pointless because being a yarn, its origin really doesn't matter, except as a matter of curiosity.
@mikloskallo9046 Жыл бұрын
Fun thing, when Bart argues about New Testament details, he regularly uses the logical construct: this episode (e.g. John the Baptist baptizing Jesus) is likely to be true, because if it was invented by early Christians, they would have told it otherwise, because being baptized by someone else, impies being in a subordinate position to the baptizer, therefore they must have inherited this story (and that's why they had probably added the detail of God acknowledging Jesus after the event: to reinforce his being the hihger level being). Now the same logical construct is used quite differently when he suggest, it must have been a clever Israelite giving the Egyptian name, Moses to the protagonist of his story. Oops.
@HkFinn83 Жыл бұрын
You’re not even trying to pay attention to what he’s saying
@mikloskallo9046 Жыл бұрын
@@HkFinn83 I'm afraid this is not even an argument.