would be nice to know what he thinks about Paul's letters, ie, whether they were genuine, when they were written, and to what extent they describe real events.
@OCA8WhitePeopleAreAlbinosOCA8Ай бұрын
Albino u know it more then Ten 😁
@OCA8WhitePeopleAreAlbinosOCA8Ай бұрын
Albino u wanna do my Hair
@loslosmith9 ай бұрын
They poisoned my mind and it did take me years but I’m happy to be free.
@henriettegraham92308 ай бұрын
SO happy for you!!!
@salvadoralba82078 ай бұрын
Me too
@davidrichards21137 ай бұрын
Your mind has been poisoned by the “God of this World”, that is Satan.
@ghosteyes27086 ай бұрын
Me too. Screw that mind poison.
@GatochanBolivia5 ай бұрын
if you call yourself free... what does that yin yang simbol means for you bro? :3 just asking. regards.
@AriusOfAlexandria3 жыл бұрын
POINT 11: What the last pagan emperor thought: "It is, I think, expedient to set forth to all mankind the reasons by which I was convinced that the fabrication of the Christians is a fiction of men composed by wickedness. Though it has in it nothing divine, by making full use of that part of the soul which loves fable and is childish and foolish, it has induced men to believe that the monstrous tale is truth." (Julian)
@ChessArmyCommander7 күн бұрын
The problem is, God fundamentally understood, or the proposition, is by definition the very first principle. In classical western theism. And we find that its in the category of metaphysics definitionally, which means you cannot get rid of the principle. Not affirming the truth of "first principles" regarding the metaphysical or transcendental categories, crashes and burns philosophically. Because the principles pertain to the necessary preconditions of our existence AND for intelligibility generally. As identified in the history of philosophy and science! I'm not making any arbitrary claims. Then it follows from the metaphysical or transcendental necessity for God's existence, or that the very first principle is true, that God is working in mysterious way. The old cliche is right. And its obvious, all we have to do is look at the World. Right? And its clear that a creator God is being hidden and mysterious on purpose, and it would be for morally sufficient reasons. That follows necessary! Due to how God would be the "ground of all being" , to include for the intelligibility of the different concepts or principles in ethics. Or moral principles/facts.
@Zerpentsa65985 сағат бұрын
Using a 4th century person who was trying to revive paganism to dismiss the existence of Jesus is too lame to take seriously.
@thomaswilson92843 сағат бұрын
A 4th century person was closer to the truth than we are. Maybe he wasn't trying to revive paganism, maybe he was just calling a duck a duck.
@wesbaumguardner88293 жыл бұрын
Makes more sense than talking snakes and donkeys.
@Yohannson3 жыл бұрын
If someone is on hallucinogens w Marijuana then talking snakes and donkeys makes perfect sense
@wesbaumguardner88293 жыл бұрын
@@Yohannson Either that or they are having a brain aneurism.
@CharlesEllis-ph6ge Жыл бұрын
If I recall that damn snake also was walking too. 😂😂😄🤣😂
@SPINNINGMYWHEELS777 Жыл бұрын
because you saw it on jootube
@SPINNINGMYWHEELS777 Жыл бұрын
@@Yohannson you keep speaking about your limited experience in the comments.
@devinbraun18523 жыл бұрын
Haven’t started watching yet, but just stoked to see something new w/Ken! Expect this to be a real treat to listen to.
@jemborg3 жыл бұрын
Me too.
@neilarmitage66329 ай бұрын
What I can't comprehend is why do so many humans have the need to worship things.
@mindsoulpower7 ай бұрын
ppl are weak, they need someone to hold tight to. spirituality is natural but they cant tell one from the other.
@larryparker86777 ай бұрын
I believe they want another life after death. This is one way in their mnds to get this.
@GatochanBolivia5 ай бұрын
we were created that way, its simple :3 many think and believe they are not religious, but we all somehow believe in something as it were a fact, it heals our mind instead of THINKING about it for real... About worshipping well, we are a kind who loves to follow the herd, what we called society, so many of us are raised this way, at home, at school, and so on. We are trained to behave in a certain way in certain situations, we are tained animals :3 and thats why in shot BECAUSE MANY OF US BELIEVE AND WORSHIP THINGS LIKE "DEATH, THE SUN, SAINTS, VIRGINS, gods and so on..." regards.
@RightOnBro725 ай бұрын
People want to try to explain the things they still don't understand. Imagine being born a long time ago, when nobody knew why the sun rose & set every day, let alone what the sun really was, or what causes natural phenomenon like rain & tornados. Somebody said it was "the gods" or the "Great Spirit," and the idea caught on so much that they started thinking they needed human sacrifices just to make it rain, or to prevent a volcano from erupting. Did it work? I don't think so. But people are still trying to find the answers.
@TheMouse2544 ай бұрын
It is been studied in psychology. Humans have a need to believe. Say you hear a noise in the bushes and your instincts tell you it is a leopard, you are safer believing it is than not and finding out it actually was. When a story is told that threatens your very existence and for eternity, you want to be safe.
@DavidFraser007 Жыл бұрын
I'm a big fan of Kenneth Humphreys. Nice to see him again.
@victorjordan47943 жыл бұрын
Hell yeah 😍....Ken is the best
@ghostriders_13 жыл бұрын
No! Ken is funny & interesting but Dr. Richard Carrier PhD IS the best!
@scottmcloughlin43712 жыл бұрын
@@ghostriders_1 I bet Socrates, Plato and Aristotle never existed. Julius Caesar was probably just a statue. Augustus Caesar was another "Son of God," so he didn't exist either. Seneca? He was just a cartoon. Origen and Justin Martyr were likely comic book heroes. George Washington never existed either. The CIA just made up Washington and Jefferson like they made up the moon landing. Marilyn Monroe didn't really die of a barbiturate overdose, because she didn't really exist. Hollywood stars were just early lifelike animated AI bots created by Disney. What could be more obvious? You know, life is really just a hologram. I'm not sure we exist either. But popular book peddlers are real. Those book peddlers will say anything to idiots for money.
@ghostriders_12 жыл бұрын
@@scottmcloughlin4371 lightweight sarcasm is not evidence or argument. Some you mention did exist, some probably not. Your no comedian just an empty cynic. Time to grow up & show some real interest in the topic.
@tamaracrowe2910 ай бұрын
Very grateful for people who can see this (to me) obvious truth. People FREAK OUT when I tell them Jesus was not a real person. A man I was on a date with literally walked out of the restaurant we were in! 😂😂😂
@stevenmorgan293210 ай бұрын
Haha! I just recently had a similar experience, so sadly, I can relate..
@georgefernandez75588 ай бұрын
Well, you dodged a bullet then, well done! You should use that strategy as a kind of initial 'man suitability test' 👍👍👋
@jimbobaggans15647 ай бұрын
I put a plastic sticker on the bumper of my car. It was a fish with legs with the name DARWIN under it.
@mindsoulpower7 ай бұрын
thank God he walked out...
@TrojansFirst6 ай бұрын
That's a good way to weed out the incompatible people.
@thesheffinator712411 ай бұрын
I wasn't aware that Ken had been on your channel Jacob, but I'm so pleased that you have he's great to listen to and that was an excellent conversation. Thank you both.
@hughhanson74198 ай бұрын
I remember sitting in church at 7 years old listening to the pastor and thinking "What a bunch of crap" I thought it was Hokum then now I know it is. Convoluted, contradictory fairy tales sound more ridiculous every time I hear them. It's amazing to me rational adults still believe this nonsense.
5 ай бұрын
IKR? snakes talking to women? magic trees? Is that supposed to be serious?
@TheDreamer19802 күн бұрын
Same, I went to Catholic schools, still not sure why my mum stopped going to church in her teens, my dad doesn't have any belief , anyway, I went to Catholic primary school, very early on it all felt wrong, even more so the older I got , confirmation etc, 1 big waste of time, I think jesus prob existed, I think there's a God/ creator but religion has nothing to do with either... If Christianity and jesus was such a threat to Satan/ dark energy, the churches would of been destroyed thousands of years ago... They remain cause the rulers of this world want them there, to bring revenue and keep people in life and distracted from what we really are
@bennettd12756 сағат бұрын
Rational adults don't believe it 😂
@Zerpentsa65985 сағат бұрын
Pastors are dangerous. Listen to a real Christian who knows Jesus.
@bryanfinegan5252 Жыл бұрын
I never got any sensible answer out of any Christian (or even had an answer when I was a Christian!) about what was the point of Jesus anyway? Surely an all powerful god can just forgive sin himself (or indeed get rid of evil altogether) which makes the idea of Jesus somewhat redundant.
@cristristam90547 ай бұрын
The god of the bible is not omni-potent and not omni-benevolent ,these attributes were given to him by theologians way later than the Old test ,and later even than the new test. The god of the bible is not omniscient either ,he finds out Adam and Eve ate the fruit after they do it and he has to search for them through the garden ,if he was omniscient he would know directly where to find them without searching. From the beginning of the story the first thing we learn if that god is not omni-potent ,takes him 6 days to make reality (instead of an instant) and than he has to REST. etc. You are making a strawmen argument asking them about an omnipotent god when the god of the bible is limited in potency. I am atheist also btw.
@DrIT-qv1ek7 ай бұрын
I guess this the reason why Islam does not need a middleman to reach God.
@Rikastin6 ай бұрын
From what I've learned, the atonement system somehow underlined the severity of breaking the relationship with God. If there's no sanction, then who cares. And death is quite a prominent penalty. First we had animals as substitute sacrifices, then, theologically speaking, the God-man himself. But it was not just for blood. Jesus was like, "now that I have your attention, be aware that the blood system sucks. God needs no more blood, He needs you to share his values. I need it. So no more strict rules but a decent spiritual moral. I offer you the guidelines, and my mercy covers the rest."
@TrojansFirst6 ай бұрын
@@DrIT-qv1ek I like the Sufi's because they don't seem to believe in a separate God. They experience being God themselves. Some of them get beheaded by Muslims for being heretical.
@11205056 ай бұрын
The point that REALLY made me first question the Christian god was when I thought “why does god need a human blood sacrifice to forgive our sins? If he’s subject to that law, then that law is more powerful than god! And then who made that law? It never ends. Pure stupidity.
@BigDGolf-2311 ай бұрын
Interestingly, i never cared if "jesus" was real or not until people started threatening me with the bible.
@KAT-dg6el8 ай бұрын
All those loving Christians. Aren’t they wonderful. 😂
@JohnHoulgate8 ай бұрын
You were threatened by a Bible? I guess it would hurt if someone threw it at you. 😂😂😂
5 ай бұрын
@@JohnHoulgate the whole point of the bible (both books) is to threaten peasants into submission.
@helios26645 ай бұрын
No hate like Christian love.
@OCA8WhitePeopleAreAlbinosOCA8Ай бұрын
I'm glad im n0t a CHRISTIAN just ignore there lies
@babsbylow68693 жыл бұрын
Thanks for posting this. I'd been beginning to wonder if Ken'd fallen off the face of the earth. Nice to see him in one piece still.
@darrellmarshall-uj2lc3 ай бұрын
Thank you Kenneth. What a refreshing, highly entertaining and humorous exposition of human gullibility. The truth, indeed, shall set us free.
@fepeerreview31502 жыл бұрын
37:00 In fact we had dozens of gospels, with lots of uncertainty and conflict about which of them should be used. (Note I did not say which is historically accurate.) Until much later, when the 4 were settled on, Christians drew ideas and beliefs from all these dozens of gospels and the stories they told varied wildly. This is itself an argument against the accuracy of the 4 gospels. The people who chose those 4 were even farther removed in time from the alleged events than the people who wrote all the apocrypha. So they were in a worse position to determine which gospels were historically accurate (if any). For this reason I don't think historical accuracy was either their interest or their intention. I think their intention was more likely political, to narrow down and control the message with at least a moderate degree of consistency, so that they could bring cohesion to the various Christian communities, create a single community, and thereby control it better.
@chazmorex9 ай бұрын
That, or create the first "Industrial Complex".
@rebelcybran58509 ай бұрын
Christian zealots, never question everything that`s make them worst enemy of themselves.
@zrobo3 жыл бұрын
I like how Ken isn't super focused on the scholarship. Usually this is a big turn off. He really points out some should-be-obvious things that I never really thought about.
@SPINNINGMYWHEELS777 Жыл бұрын
what scholarship guy doesn't even know he was never named Jesus. That's a modern invention.
@anthonycostine50674 ай бұрын
Kenneth is a treasure!
@user-zo6dj1kk3v8 ай бұрын
I saw a man walking on water. He was 100 feet off shore but turns out the water was only 1/2 inch deep. It was an illusion. This was south side of Lake Erie at a state park. I talked to him, he assured me he was not jesus, he gave me a beer. Nice guy. When a stranger gives you a beer when you're camping and you dont have a beer, well, that's worthy of praise, miracle or not. Cheers!
@mh4zd6 ай бұрын
And lo from his hands he did produce the wine of the grain, and they did partake and were filled with the spirit, and He said, "It is good," as they both ascended into the Heavens.
@kenyattathompson66856 сағат бұрын
@@mh4zdyou said my write like the inspired Nice try
@mortyharenza98548 ай бұрын
I was age 14 at my Presbyterian Sunday class held in a side room. We did not go to the preaching services except for Xmas and Easter. We were listening to our instructor discuss Moses and the touching the rock to bring forth water. Moses tapped twice, I tapped out. Never looked back and never went back.
@jamesowen49387 ай бұрын
You're lucky. I was stuck until I was 19.
@Moodboard395 ай бұрын
boy u was young
5 ай бұрын
I was into science as a tot. Never believed the religion thing for one second.
@jimbob30303 ай бұрын
I didn't have a single point where I lost my faith, but all along as they told me things which made completely no sense I questioned everything and kept asking them questions they had no answers for. I left religion and left catholic school around the same age you did, but not for any one reason, because I could never believe all the nonsense they were trying to feed me all along and because they never had any acceptable answers to any of my questions.
@Lizardkingmediaproductions2 ай бұрын
I went to a born again from age 10-12, and they were psychos about the end times and demons, and everything being Satanic all the time. 30 years later, they livestream their services, and it’s the same Pastor and his entire family, just like the Righteous Gemstones TV Show. They’re balling with a rich lifestyle now, with a bunch of dumb and broke people in their pews. And they use this mindfuck that they’re blessed as evidence of their material blessings and the broke people in their pews aren’t good enough Christians since they’re not getting blessed by God. It’s really sad, and they should be taxed at 45%.
@SCS-19643 жыл бұрын
Always loved Kens outro on his videos "Its just more astounding rubbish from the new testament"
@dawnemile74992 жыл бұрын
This video greatly adds to the research that I have been doing for the past three years. I have a copy of the book that Josephus wrote.
@PraveenKumar-dj1yg3 жыл бұрын
I am an atheist, been that way for the past 5 years, but boy does this make sense or what...
@SPINNINGMYWHEELS777 Жыл бұрын
it fits right into your death cult mentality of being an atheist.
@cassandra43113 Жыл бұрын
Rediculas.. Jesus did existed looked around
@lutkedog1 Жыл бұрын
@@cassandra43113 Why defend Jesus with Garbel ?
@newnoggin210 ай бұрын
@@cassandra43113 Please invest in a dictionary.
@johnholmesinchesahead3428 ай бұрын
The future will be very warm.
@stephenvanwoert24473 жыл бұрын
A very thought-provoking conversation.
@LittleImpaler3 жыл бұрын
This is the problem with the Historical Jesues. The evidence isn't there.
@scottmcloughlin43712 жыл бұрын
@@OrthoDavidSun I bet Socrates, Plato and Aristotle never existed. Julius Caesar was probably just a statue. Augustus Caesar was another "Son of God," so he didn't exist either. Seneca? He was just a cartoon. Origen and Justin Martyr were likely comic book heroes. Charlemagne too. He obviously never existed. George Washington never existed either. The CIA just made up Washington and Jefferson like they made up the moon landing. Marilyn Monroe didn't really die of a barbiturate overdose, because she didn't really exist. Hollywood stars were just early lifelike animated AI bots created by Disney. What could be more obvious? You know, life is really just a hologram. I'm not sure we exist either. But popular book peddlers are real. Those book peddlers will say anything to idiots to take their money.
@BhaalSakh Жыл бұрын
There is only fabricated evidence such as the shroud of Turin, that christians cling on to, unwilling to see the truth about the fabrication of their sick superstition. A supersition that makes them miserable, and yet unable to set themselves free from it.
@1stHuemanAmerican11 ай бұрын
Well CHRISTIANITY is dead good bye
@haydenwalton276610 ай бұрын
the great thing about ignorance - you can free yourself from it terrific talk from ken
@deepaknayak768610 ай бұрын
All of your problems will be solved in the afterlife ...A Son of Man is sitting on a white throne with power and authority ...
@Brother_TD10 ай бұрын
> 49:54 < Matthew 18:2-6
@pbohearn Жыл бұрын
This dude has such a comprehensive and incisive understanding of the Jesus story and gives a smashing critique of it on so many levels as to its origins, growth and maintenance in Western culture. But as he says, when you’re a Believe, facts don’t matter.
@johnholmesinchesahead3428 ай бұрын
You're just scared the story is real.
@roberthesser64028 ай бұрын
@@johnholmesinchesahead342 They aren't, but I'm pretty sure you are. Atheists don't have an investment in whether it's true or not; if evidence comes forth that Jesus was a real person, we'd just accept it (not the divinity, just the man; divinity is a whole different category of burden of proof). But you, on the other hand, want to believe it, because you're scared of being wrong.
@Prospro87 ай бұрын
To be honest, not one thing that Kenneth said is new. Most clergy, if they've been adequately trained know all this stuff, but Kenneth isn't taking it to the next level, the meta-level where he might see the transcendentalist truth behind it. The famous German theologian Rudolf Bultmann said, 'Faith must never be allowed to be dependent upon the labours of a historian'. The Christ within idea is just not catered for in Kenneth's mindset.
@TrojansFirst6 ай бұрын
@@Prospro8 Yeah I agree that part is useful. The earliest Christians knew Jesus was an allegorical myth and they used it as a teaching tool. It was Rome that literalized the Jesus story.. I love the teachings myself. Love God (I interpret that as loving reality) Love your neighbor, love your enemies. It really liberates you when you practice these teachings but you need the powerful non-dual experiences to really understand it, that's what Kenneth is missing, the powerful divine and mystical experiences. Who cares if there was historical Jesus walking around.
5 ай бұрын
@@Prospro8 "The Christ within" you mean the bullshit within. FIFY.
@MMaximuSS19753 жыл бұрын
Good video but the Google ads every 7 minutes is getting to the point where I no longer want to finish the video. Holy f*** hell KZbin.
@History-Valley3 жыл бұрын
There are now fewer ads on the video.
@katarinaj.68305 ай бұрын
@@MMaximuSS1975 it's worth paying a few bugs a month to get rids of the adds, totally different experience 😁👍
@Iamjamessmith16 ай бұрын
Paul went into the desert or Arabia and concocted the Christian religion that he preached for 3 months. Then he went and preached it. This is typically how all religions are made, including Islam and the Mormons and others. Their main founder spends time alone sequestered and then comes out with the message.
@pattykake71952 күн бұрын
Joe Smith was a complete fraud and womaniser….🤢
@TheInterestedObserver3 жыл бұрын
The story about Josephus being in the cave for three days, Josephus being by the side of Titus as he mirrors exactly the ministry of Jesus. Josephus seeing three friends on the crosses and taking down the bodies, surely, surely by now it is evidently clear exactly who is behind the gospel stories?? Clearly it is Josephus with full mandate from Rome.
@wowojeejee3 жыл бұрын
Historians agree that there is not one written eyewitness account of Jesus during his lifetime. Strange since he was famous at birth, because wise men expected to see the future king of Jews who was born from a virgin married mother. Every leading Christian scholar since Erasmus, five hundred years ago, has maintained that the gospels were originally written in Greek from 70 to 140 CE (Mark after the year 70, Luke about 110, Matthew about 130, and John no earlier than 140 CE). This proves that they were not written by Christ's apostles, disciples or by any of the early Christians. Others say: “There is no proof of the Gospels existing before 130 CE” Jesus is depicted as hugely popular in the gospels. Yet he is unrecorded by non-Biblical historians. Paul was the first one to write about Jesus around 60CE; but he, like everyone else, never saw Jesus. He experienced a vision of the resurrected Jesus. Even Paul’s existence is in serious doubt. John Gresham Machen wrote: The establishment of Christianity as a world religion, to almost as great an extent as any great historical movement can be ascribed to one man, was the work of Paul. I also read that the history of the first three popes was invented because they never existed. All myth! Seek the truth!
@charlesbrowne95903 жыл бұрын
Tiberius Julius Alexander was Titus’ chief of staff and watched as the temple was sacked. He wrote under pseudonym Josephus and is the founder of the Xian religion. Josephus’ biography is a fiction.
@TheInterestedObserver3 жыл бұрын
@@charlesbrowne9590 Josephus clearly is of Flavian and Herodian stock just like Vaspasian was and some people even place Titus as Josephus’ cousin. They are the pens behind Peter and Paul, with Paul attributed to the works of Pliny the Younger Josephus’ foster brother. However looking at these works, they will have been done by a literary team not one man or even two and yes Ur Markus and Ur Mattheus Gould be the q documents but they stem back to Seneca and the first attempt to write a global religion. There are multiple real Jesuses and they are spoken about, preachers and high priests. Then there is the gospel Jesus and the whole thing is actually the cruellest most scathing mockery of Judaism ever. It’s offensive and deliberately so. I would say that everything except for the Pentateuch is written by a Greek and Roman pens.
@charlesbrowne95902 жыл бұрын
@@TheInterestedObserver Thank you for your thoughtful reply. I agree that the NT was written by a team of intellectuals with ready access to Jewish and Greek literature. I’ll bet it was written at the Great Library of Alexandria! The Library sought all the books of the world, so they might have had the entire corpus of Xian literature. This would have been a big problem for the church. Xians were called “the people of the book”. One advantage of the book over the scroll is that changes can be made by replacing a single page rather than the entire manuscript. Also, mass production of books is easier than with scrolls: each scribe need only copy one page many times.
@Baa9752 жыл бұрын
Interesting
@dredog403 жыл бұрын
keep up the good work Jacob & Ken.
@ErichVonCartmann11 ай бұрын
I can't seem to find Kenneth Humphrey's book the long version "Jesus Never Existed". I was only able to find the short version, "Jesus Never Existed: an Introductory"
@MatthewCaunsfield3 жыл бұрын
Ken is just such terrific fun to listen to 😁👍
@johnholmesinchesahead3428 ай бұрын
He couldn't answer my question as to why donkeys have a cross on their backs.
5 ай бұрын
@@johnholmesinchesahead342 lol I hope that's a joke
@katarinaj.6830 Жыл бұрын
He's mentioned way more than 10 points 😉😊👍
5 ай бұрын
and still missed a few, like the objective impossibility of miracles.
@katarinaj.68305 ай бұрын
If you believe hard enough....😉😅🤷🏻♀️
@SPDATA18 ай бұрын
Third time I listened to this....❤❤
@charles-iii675927 күн бұрын
"And according to Mark so and so..." "And according to Peter so and so..." "And Paul said this and that." Who are those people saying "according to" and "this guy said this and that"? That we do not know. But the amount of shoehorning, special pleadings and mental gymnastic coming from believers is mind blowing.
@OCA8WhitePeopleAreAlbinosOCA822 күн бұрын
I knew JESUS wasn't Real I luv the old Mx
@mariadacre96479 ай бұрын
So Tacitus. Joesphus etc never mentioned Jesus?
@EdwardM-t8p9 ай бұрын
Josephus may have mentioned a different Jesus in his Antiquities 18.3.3 & 20.9.1, but then the two passages following 18.3.3 seem to debunk what we read in the offending passage. 18.3.4 discredits the idea of demigods being born of gods being intimate with women and the supposed deity of Jesus in particular, and 18.3.5 seems to call out Christianity as a scam but not by name.
@EdwardM-t8p9 ай бұрын
Tacitus on the other hand probably referred to Chrestus who gave Jews in Rome the impulse to riot during Claudius's reign (Suetonius, Lives of the 12 Caesars: Claudius 25.4) because the manuscript evidence shows that he didn't mention Christians but rather Chréstians.
5 ай бұрын
neither Josephus not Tacitus were even born when Jesus was supposedly crucified. They wouldn't know jack sht.
@journeysofar24 күн бұрын
Fun and good interview. Lots of interesting tidbits
@JohnJones-fh2uy2 жыл бұрын
"As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand." --Josh Billings, 1865 "Believers" just want to believe. They never give a rat's ass about having evidence that supports their beliefs.
@ima1sthuemanonearth912 жыл бұрын
I agree 💯
@scottmcloughlin43712 жыл бұрын
@@ima1sthuemanonearth91 The books of the bible are not pictures. I bet Socrates, Plato and Aristotle never existed. Julius Caesar was probably just a statue. Augustus Caesar was another "Son of God," so he didn't exist either. Seneca? He was just a cartoon. Origen and Justin Martyr were likely comic book heroes. Charlemagne too. He obviously never existed. George Washington never existed either. The CIA just made up Washington and Jefferson like they made up the moon landing. Marilyn Monroe didn't really die of a barbiturate overdose, because she didn't really exist. Hollywood stars were just early lifelike animated AI bots created by Disney. What could be more obvious? You know, life is really just a hologram. I'm not sure we exist either. But popular book peddlers are real. Those book peddlers will say anything to idiots to take their money.
@BenThomas-z9m8 ай бұрын
excess? very excessive and more and more and more no one survives well
@salvadoralba82078 ай бұрын
Yes, and that's how you have Jesus hard to crack stuff
@BagzAndPresident7 ай бұрын
@@scottmcloughlin4371the moon landed was fake and we have proof marilyn existed
@rochesterjohnny75553 жыл бұрын
Great video Jacob, thanks Ken it was a real treat
@delfimoliveira88833 жыл бұрын
I like Ken He isnt a soft speaker Good interview Jacob Berman
@trina21002 күн бұрын
I enjoyed this. I giggled quite a few times but Mr. Humphrey's makes a lot of sense.
@pietsanvenero975614 күн бұрын
All I can say this day if you give me a choice to pick nomatter what poeple say I will take the chance and pick Jesus Christ and if I am wrong I will never know about anything about my death there is nothing dead end 2 But if it is true then I would know because of all the promises in the Bible and will be the happiest person in the new world and life of no more problems ❤
@kateknowles80552 күн бұрын
This is the good WAY to choose.
@bennettd12755 сағат бұрын
You described Pascal's wager. There are hundreds of religions. You better make sure to follow and believe them all just in case one of the other religions happens to be true.
@riversdelance3433Күн бұрын
Romans kept good documents. One good way you know somebody showed up is when His enemies said He was there.
@chilli80118 ай бұрын
I used to say, Jesus knew the OOT enough that he and his friends just did what they had to to fulfil the prophecies. Self Fulfilled prophecies! Now I know even better, Thanks!
@dan57607 ай бұрын
Brilliant interview. As firm Catholic/IHS it does offer insight. Any claims must be able to stand - When scrutinized. Only fair to do so
@demej003 күн бұрын
I am a better person because of Jesus.
@MikeTMike3 күн бұрын
So, can you demonstrate he exists? The fact you believe something doesn't mean it's true.
@iheartthickhoes3 күн бұрын
you are a better person because of the steps you take day by day...not because of jesus
@kateknowles80552 күн бұрын
What is undemonstrable to those who have eyes but see not, others obtain by their prayers. "The fact that you believe does not make it a falsehood either."
@MikeTMike2 күн бұрын
@@kateknowles8055 Nothing fails like prayer.
@Katnip4522 күн бұрын
@@kateknowles8055What utter prevarication. You have zero evidence for this storybook character so you just evade that by pretending your mental fantasies make him real. Yikes.
@litew82 күн бұрын
When it becomes obvious, it becomes so very obvious that you wonder how anyone could not see it.
@springNoNWo Жыл бұрын
I like listening to Kenneth Humphreys alot!
@juiceytee6 ай бұрын
Great episode ❤
@doggiesarus5 ай бұрын
At the beginning, the information about (ancient) Nazareth never existing is interesting. I've never heard that.
@asmaelitemiz20393 жыл бұрын
The narrative in Acts begins to speak Saul (8:1) without any indication that he was also called Paul. Then the switch in the name suddenly occurs without any explanation in the account of the apostle's first preaching voyage: 'Then Saul- also known as Paul ( in the original Greek o kai Paulos, literally ' the also Paul') - was filled with the Holy Spirit...' (13:9). Furthermore, Acts attributes to Paul the following identification of himself (21:39, then elaborated in 22:3): I am a Jew, born in Tarsus in Cilicia, but brought up here in Jerusalem as a student of Gamaliel...in the Law of our ancestors. In the epistles he himself wrote, Paul does not mention Tarsus, in Cilicia (today in southern Turkey), as his place of birth, nor does he make any personal reference to an early residence in Jerusalem, or to Gamaliel as his instructor in the Jewish law. In Galatians 1:21, he speaks of 'places in...Cilicia' which he went to visit three years after the start of his apostolic career, without in any way indicating that he had a home or relatives there.From the information he personally gives about the beginning of his apostolic career(Galatians 1:17-18), the implications is that he was a resident ( perhaps a native) of Damascus and that his visit to Jerusalem three years after his conversion was his first- barring the possibility of an earlier visit or visits on pilgrimage. Possibly, Acts confuses the identity of Paul with that of another person called Saul who was the student of Gamaliel, and who actually lived in Jerusalem, where he was a Jewish persecutor of the early followers of Jesus- among other things, approving of the ' murder' of Stephen, the first Nazarene marter in the city (8:1). It is also possible that the use of Saul as Paul's original name was outright invention. Paul himself claimed to belong to the Israelite tribe ofBenjamin, and recognized Jesus as a descendant of David. Historically, there was a Saul who was the first king of Israel,and this Saul, like Paul, belonged to the tribe of Benjamin; David, who replaced him on the Israelite throne, belonged to the tribe of Judah. It was perhaps for this reason that the name Saul was assumed to have been the original name of Paul. Acts could have been drawing a subtle parallel between Paul and the historical Saul on the one hand, and between Jesus and David on the other, where it made Paul say in a speech, shortly after the change of his name (Acts 13:20-3): (God) gave ( the Israelites) judges until the time of the prophet Samuel. And when they asked for a king , God gave them Saul son of Kish from the tribe of Benjamin, to be their king for forty years. After removing him, God made David their king. This is what God said about him: ' I have found that David son of Jesse is the kind of man I like, a man who will do all I want him to do.' It was jesus, a descendant of David, whom God made the Saviour of the people of Israel., as he had promised. It is worth noting here that in the epistles he himself wrote, unlike this speech attributed to him, Paul does not dwell on the Davidic descent of Jesus, but merely mentions it in two instances in a somewhat offhand manner, and both times as a passing reference.
@bleirdo_dude2 жыл бұрын
Here's the fishy story of Saul's/Paul's conversion. 🐟 Acts 9:3-8 "3 Now as he was going along and approaching Damascus, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him. 4 He fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to him, "Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?" 5 He asked, "Who are you, Lord?" The reply came, "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting. 6 But get up and enter the city, and you will be told what you are to do." 7 The men who were traveling with him stood speechless because they heard the voice but saw no one. 8 Saul got up from the ground, and though his eyes were open, he could see nothing; so they led him by the hand and brought him into Damascus." 2 Maccabees 3:23-28 "23 Heliodorus went on with what had been decided. 24 But when he arrived at the treasury with his bodyguard, then and there the Sovereign of spirits and of all authority caused so great a manifestation that all who had been so bold as to accompany him were astounded by the power of God, and became faint with terror. 25 For there appeared to them a magnificently caparisoned horse, with a rider of frightening mien; it rushed furiously at Heliodorus and struck at him with its front hoofs. Its rider was seen to have armor and weapons of gold. 26 Two young men also appeared to him, remarkably strong, gloriously beautiful and splendidly dressed, who stood on either side of him and flogged him continuously, inflicting many blows on him. 27 When he suddenly fell to the ground and deep darkness came over him, his men took him up, put him on a stretcher, 28 and carried him away - this man who had just entered the aforesaid treasury with a great retinue and all his bodyguard but was now unable to help himself. They recognized clearly the sovereign power of God." Acts 9:17-19 "17 So Ananias went and entered the house. He laid his hands on Saul and said, "Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus, who appeared to you on your way here, has sent me so that you may regain your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit." 18 And immediately something like scales fell from his eyes, and his sight was restored. Then he got up and was baptized,19 and after taking some food, he regained his strength. For several days he was with the disciples in Damascus, 20 and immediately he began to proclaim Jesus in the synagogues, saying, "He is the Son of God."' Tobit 11:7-8, :11-15a "7 Raphael said to Tobias, before he had approached his father, "I know that his eyes will be opened. 8 Smear the gall of the fish on his eyes; the medicine will make the white films shrink and peel off from his eyes, and your father will regain his sight and see the light."' "11 with the gall of the fish in his hand, and holding him firmly, he blew into his eyes, saying, "Take courage, father." With this he applied the medicine on his eyes, 12 and it made them smart. 13 Next, with both his hands he peeled off the white films from the corners of his eyes. Then Tobit saw his son and threw his arms around him, 14 and he wept and said to him, "I see you, my son, the light of my eyes!" Then he said, "Blessed be God, and blessed be his great name, and blessed be all his holy angels. May his holy name be blessed throughout all the ages. 15 Though he afflicted me, he has had mercy upon me. Now I see my son Tobias!"' 2 Maccabees 3:34-36 "34 And see that you, who have been flogged by heaven, report to all people the majestic power of God." Having said this they vanished. 35 Then Heliodorus offered sacrifice to the Lord and made very great vows to the Savior of his life, and having bidden Onias farewell, he marched off with his forces to the king. 36 He bore testimony to all concerning the deeds of the supreme God, which he had seen with his own eyes." "The use of cycles, parallels, repetitions, melodramatic characterization, stereotyped scene construction, inventing or presenting stories that replicate biblical narrative, unbalanced narrative with evident symbolic import, and a balanced structure-all these raise insurmountable objections. History cannot be quite so symmetrical. In addition there are any number of historical problems." Richard Pervo, The Mystery of Acts, pp. 151 Note: In Acts nowhere does the authorities show concern that a convicted criminal (Jesus) escaped justice, and is being harbored by what could be perceived as rebels against the government.
@hippopotamus67652 жыл бұрын
Straight out of Homer's Odyssey.
@EdwardM-t8p9 ай бұрын
An obvious mimesis of Virgil's Aenaeus - Dennis R. MacDonald
@coreywicks14512 ай бұрын
The key to all this is the Orphic and Dionysian mysteries. Once you get a better grasp of this, then, you begin to see right through the Christian smokescreen.
@OCA8WhitePeopleAreAlbinosOCA82 ай бұрын
people know JESUS wasn't Real CHRISTIANITY don't have a Smokescreen 😊
@russellcollier83202 жыл бұрын
@14.00: 'a lot of it, (Christian scripture) of course, is an echo of the Old Testament. Well, who knew! ? And there' s plenty more where that little gem came from! This guy just cracks me up. Very entertaining, almost like a comedy spoof.
@bobmurphy96863 жыл бұрын
This was good stuff.
@470ollie7 ай бұрын
Excellent work, Kenneth. All relayed with a hearty and healthy dose of humor. Oh, the tragically hilarious gullibility of our dubiously foolish specious. 😂
@JamesRichardWiley5 ай бұрын
We have two Jesus characters. The first was a wandering Jewish doomsday preacher who was finally executed as a public nuisance for stirring up the people in a period of political unrest. The second is a miracle working godman invented by the early Christians resulting in a collection of Jesus stories called the New Testament.
@MrCyclist5 ай бұрын
As a non-academic, Ken makes so much sense.
@ml17128 ай бұрын
Publius Lentulus: “He is a tall, well-proportioned man and there is a severity in his countenance which attracted love and reverence. His hair is the color of new wine, from the roots to the ears and thence to the shoulders. He has never been seen to laugh but has been observed to weep. This was a letter describing what Jesus looked like according to Publius Lentulus
@njm32118 күн бұрын
Hmmmm, never heard of this dude.
@mikeyoung76608 ай бұрын
Love your videos excellent thank you
@kirkmarshall28533 жыл бұрын
I like Ken and I definitely think Jesus is just fictional. Edit: it’s hilarious how people will react to those four small words strung together: Jesus did not exist. See below for details.
@JerryPenna3 жыл бұрын
I’m at 50-50 but definitely think Christian’s used Greek, Roman and Egyptian concepts to create a greater god than all.
@kingofdetroit3583 жыл бұрын
Martin Luther king also never existed...it was propaganda
@kirkmarshall28533 жыл бұрын
@@kingofdetroit358 wow you are a fool
@kirkmarshall28533 жыл бұрын
@@kingofdetroit358 Martin Luther was a moron. Martin Luther King was real and a far better human than Martin Luther we have evidence . There isn’t a single piece of evidence that the buybull is right about anything.
@kingofdetroit3583 жыл бұрын
@@kirkmarshall2853 sure buddy...n Lisa Ann never took a dp right?
@reginaldwilliams6176 ай бұрын
I love his laugh after every point... I laugh with him after every point..😂😂
@1stHuemanAmerican6 ай бұрын
Yeah because u know JESUS wasn't real 😊
@Farmfield Жыл бұрын
I grew up in Sweden in the 1970-80's and in religious studies in school, this idea that we had all these similar cults but Christianity was the one cult that was based on a real guy, that was presented as pretty fishy. And we're not talking full blown mythisism here, but it was pointed out that was pretty weird. So that just has to be the starting point. Jesus looks a lot by all these other made up figures and the presupposition of Jesus being real, unless proven otherwise, that's not reasonable.
@brewerlarry5627Күн бұрын
Great show
@EdwardM-t8p9 ай бұрын
Thank you Jacob and Kenneth. Jacob, for having Kenneth on, and Kenneth, for your massive work of exposing the sketchiness of Christianity. I've vacillated between there being an historical Jesus and none whatsoever and now I am convinced that there wasn't any that conforms to the scholarly consensus of the guild of New Testament scholarship. What evidence is there is just extremely dodgy. P.S. Right before this video I watched a lecture by Richard Carrier, who takes down the biblical "evidence" for an historical Jesus and advances a celestial Jesus for Christianity's origins. 🙏 I hope you have him on the show, Jacob. 🙂
@toms366411 ай бұрын
The argument at :47 minutes is top notch
@johnholmesinchesahead3428 ай бұрын
Anyone can walk on water - if you possess the right type of shoes. Nag Hammidi Library - Gospel of the Cobbler.
@Luke1959Күн бұрын
What an interesting analysis, glad I came across this!! I was taught to question everything, research and make up your own mind. I'm not the only one 👍👍😂
@mver1913 жыл бұрын
Jesus is both historical and not. There likely was some kind of preacher inspired by John the Baptist that took over when John died. But he likely had very little to do with the Jesus of the Bible. Very few "miracles" are shared between the gospels. And those that do are the weaker ones that can be explained otherwise (feeding the people in the wilderness etc). So is a fictional character inspired by a real historical person a historical figure? Should we consider Doc from Back to the Future historical because he is the stereotypical Einstein like scientist, with Einstein being a real person? Or Rick from Rick and Morty for the same reason?
@billiewinton59064 күн бұрын
You might come up with a thousand reasons but you will never change the truth.
@iheartthickhoes3 күн бұрын
and truth is religious people are blind followers of make beleive indoctrination 😅
@Bxtskul1l Жыл бұрын
If someone is asking you to be a follower, and believe in magic - chances are you are being recruited into a cult.
@Kinesiology411 Жыл бұрын
Oh magic exists, lol, and requires no group or leader.
@rosannag.burroughs45632 күн бұрын
I must admit that Supernatural things Does Happen because several times in my life Ive witness things! And I credit this to the unseen Godself within, which is the Highest Consciousness within that can do All Things!!! 17:52
@jonathansobieski2962 Жыл бұрын
Josephus’ Testimonium Flavianum has been shown beyond any reasonable doubt to be an interpolation by Goldberg in the 90s because it derives from the Emmaus story in Luke’s gospel.
@QuestionThingsUseLogic11 ай бұрын
From what I've discovered, Flavius Josephus was a pseudonym for the main author of the NT. Aka Ar/rius Pi so.
@EdwardM-t8p9 ай бұрын
Or he wrote the thing as is and in the next two passages subtly demonstrated the utter falsity of Christianity. I'm not even sure that the TF doesn't contain a subtle hint that Jesus never existed.
@onepercenter133 ай бұрын
Thanks guys
@OCA8WhitePeopleAreAlbinosOCA82 ай бұрын
Albino u n0t the only one percenter 😊
@blackstter63172 ай бұрын
Man created Gods.
@OCA8WhitePeopleAreAlbinosOCA82 ай бұрын
Duh Man created Words to talk 2 😊
@blackstter63172 ай бұрын
@@OCA8WhitePeopleAreAlbinosOCA8 It's a shame you don't use them, then.
@EmmanuelOgbua4 күн бұрын
My question ! When he uses the term " We don't know " What does " we " mean ? I suppose he represents himself ( singular ) to ( we ! Plural )
@e.h.58494 күн бұрын
he is deluded. and what a ridiculous facial hair......
@jemborg3 жыл бұрын
Oh boy! Big fan 😁👍
@9ja9ite6 ай бұрын
Hey guys. I’m commenting two years after the initial video so this might get lost like a fart in the wind but I have a question for the community. I’ve been really diving into biblical in your eastern history for the last year since my Deconversion. It’s incredibly fascinating to get into the dirt and actually look at real history and timelines as opposed to the fairytales we were handed down. One of the things that is very confusing to me listening to so many different scholars is the timeline of how early Christianity started. There seems to be a main stream consensus about Paul being first then the gospels in the early Christian writers. What’s puzzling to me is how so much of the early Christian writers timelines don’t match up to win historians say they should. As a novice newcomer I’m trying to look at everything from a first principles position and I keep hitting walls where I’m asking why are you placing this in the late first century when people are referencing governor’s or emperors from 25-50 years later? Like I said I’m just a novice and studying this on KZbin to help unlearn much of the nonsense I grew up with BUT all the inconsistencies in the dating I’ve heard make me think Christianity did not start with Paul in the mid first century. It seems like it was at least a hundred years later and a whole lot of tampering was done to texts by changes and complete removal of them by the early church. How de we trust anything when they had over 1000 years to do and create any narrative they wanted with zero ability for anyone to fact check them? So I guess the short question is - is it possible Christianity started something like 50-100 years later then we think and the church just twisted everything to push it back to an earlier time?
@jeffmacdonald98636 ай бұрын
What references do you think are that much later? Obviously, if the texts were edited then there could have been references to later figures that aren't in the texts we have, but then you wouldn't see that from the texts we have. And there wasn't anywhere near 1000 years to edit it. We've got fragments of 2nd century manuscripts and can cobble together complete texts from the 3rd. There are definitely copying errors and some larger differences, but nothing like what you're suggesting. (And if it did all start 100 years later, then there would be even less time to clean up the texts.)
5 ай бұрын
Paul is the only relevant source on Jesus' historicity. If his letters are properly dated to the mid 1st century, there was obviously a Jesus cult in existence at that time.
@colincrisp1592 Жыл бұрын
loved it THANK YOU BOTH
@BenThomas-z9m8 ай бұрын
the buble was created by outstanding people 👍🏻 but nobody is perfect, jesus was invented and some few people grasp it 🫰🏻⚫️☢️☯️
@OCA8WhitePeopleAreAlbinosOCA85 ай бұрын
I agree 😊
@rosannag.burroughs45632 күн бұрын
A man called Jesus Never Existed!!! The word Jesus means Your Highest Consciousness within!!!
@sutapasbhattacharya94712 күн бұрын
Iesous Christos meant annointed saviour but represents the Inner Light of Pure Consciousness - the Son of God refers to the purified ego in Gnosis [aka anandamayakosa, ochema or Garment of Light etc.].
@psilosydetrusenses41253 жыл бұрын
Do you think Paul was a made up character?
@History-Valley3 жыл бұрын
No I don’t think that.
@downenout87053 жыл бұрын
Someone wrote the letters, so you might as well call him Paul.
@History-Valley3 жыл бұрын
@@downenout8705 I would say so.
@jimnasium39793 жыл бұрын
Paul was a real guy...but he invented his own bogus bio. Paul probably killed the dude that the Jesus character was very loosely based on.
@QuestionThingsUseLogic11 ай бұрын
@@downenout8705Pliny the Younger wrote as Paul.
@멸문멸공-b4c4 күн бұрын
Please look horizontally at the camera instead of looking up.
@אמנוןנחשלים3 күн бұрын
Yes😂
@OttoNomicus9 ай бұрын
I think the miracle of calming the sea is about the fact that if you put some vegetable oil in wavy water it makes the waves reduce so much that you can see the flat area spreading out from where it was dropped in. In fact, in old times a sailing ship was saved by the captain dumping 5 gallons of oil overboard, it spread across an area of about a km around the ship. I saw a video showing the effect in a pond.
@EdwardM-t8p9 ай бұрын
Now what was Jesus doing in a boat with 12 young men, even teenagers, and 5 gallons or so of olive oil? 🤔 These stories rapidly get very suspicious once you have a rational, non-miraculous way of achieving these "miracles"!
@sulongenjop74366 ай бұрын
This is the main problem when we live 2000 yrs after Jesus and try to disprove him ever existed!!!
@jtprobst15 ай бұрын
That’s because you can’t prove something that is not true. We Jews are still here, yet xtians spit on us and worship an imaginative character they claim was Jewish….. 😂😂😂😂 we are the suffering servant, suffering from xtians delusion and thirst for 🩸 in the name of their dream man.
@justbe14513 жыл бұрын
Excellent chat fellows, reality does not allow Christians to think beyond the dogma. There are many in the world that are willing to hear different.
@lightatthecape20092 жыл бұрын
Oh puleeeese. Self aggrandising bull crap is still shit.
@ChessArmyCommander7 күн бұрын
Just curious, if you could decide magically or whatever, whether or not Jesus Christ is real according to all that scripture says about him, which reality would you choose? With Jesus being a divine real being, or not? Why, briefly?
@ChessArmyCommander2 сағат бұрын
That's what I thought. lol Crickets.
@winstonshipman8734 Жыл бұрын
I am Jewish and I have great respect for the scholarship of Kenneth Humphreys when he talks about Paul . (Saul Of Tarsus ) and the fact what they claim Paul did and the logic of what he preaches about Jesus is nothing but fiction. But I must somewhat disagree on Jesus . The Jews never claimed he did not exist even in the early centuries . But if you actually heard him speak I believe few would be interested.. He sounded like those Christians you will see with the signs"Repent the end of the world is near" wandering through the cities even today. The ones most think are crazy.
@Kinesiology411 Жыл бұрын
They are crazy, lol. The Jews invented the Jesus myth to quell a rebellion.
5 ай бұрын
Life of Brian is a documentary
@jujujudio4 ай бұрын
Many think Moses didn't exist either. Another fairy tale claimed by 3 warmongering religions. Bizarre, all of it.
@timdavies22013 күн бұрын
"So what is point 2?" "Sorry remind me what the question was?" This man is clearly a genius.
@HugeAndHugeCoinChannal Жыл бұрын
No Jesus Here in 2023
@1stHuemanAmerican11 ай бұрын
I'm glad I'm not a CHRISTIAN 😊
@kateknowles80552 күн бұрын
Jesus here in 2024. His Spirit is where it is welcome. His Source and his Word are everyplace everytime.
@elizabethtaylor86035 күн бұрын
The first-century Jewish historian Flavius Josephus provides external information on some people and events found in the New Testament. The extant manuscripts of Josephus' book Antiquities of the Jews, written around AD 93-94, contain two references to Jesus of Nazareth and one reference to John the Baptist.
@Lucinda-zr9su4 сағат бұрын
Josephus' account was proven to be a hoax...it was added in later. Josephus never mentioned Jesus.
@jesusexposed18483 жыл бұрын
I knew JESUS wasn't real Thank U NIQQAS
@SPINNINGMYWHEELS777 Жыл бұрын
Jesus was never his name you are correct his name is Yahushua.
@lutkedog1 Жыл бұрын
@@SPINNINGMYWHEELS777 Yeshua
@Humphrey-x2z10 ай бұрын
@@SPINNINGMYWHEELS777and he was not born on the 25th of december... Christmas is part of the fairy-tale
@SPINNINGMYWHEELS7779 ай бұрын
@@lutkedog1 Yes that's correct as well - and ends up as 'Joshuah' in English not 'JESSUS' . What I find interesting though is when I only 'thought' of the only begotten Son of God Yahuah was named Jesus.. I still came to him - so we have to realize God does work through our own ignorance ..but for us to perpetuate the ignorance is where evil creeps in. Thanks for your reply friend.
@SPINNINGMYWHEELS7779 ай бұрын
@@Humphrey-x2z Christmas helped me see the fraud in the Churchianity. All they did was put a pagan ritual into the minds under this guise. I even heard that there could be direct evidence he was born on April 1st and is why they created April fools day to mock Him.
@youarenotme017 ай бұрын
I should make videos. I truly do understand this better than anyone I’ve listened to/read. My answer is so simple, and has undeniable proof. Takes minutes. You guys are over-intellectualising. Real answers are so elegant in simplicity there’s no argument one can make against them.
@kberken6 ай бұрын
Intriguing. What's your basic premise?
@konmanolis29072 жыл бұрын
Brilliant
@ima1sthuemanonearth912 жыл бұрын
Albino u m i s s me long time no see
@topphatt6282 жыл бұрын
I think he looked like a punk rocker with a briefcase.
@BenThomas-z9m8 ай бұрын
this guy is the truth 🧐🟡🟨 i see it
@BubbylovesJesus11 ай бұрын
When Jesus fills you with The Holy Spirit, you are born again! I pray you seek Jesus with your whole heart,soul, body and mind ! 🙏🏽🙌🏽☝🏾
@QuestionThingsUseLogic11 ай бұрын
It's all fiction bro.
@BubbylovesJesus11 ай бұрын
@@QuestionThingsUseLogic , I’m so happy to tell you that you are wrong! Jesus is Alive! He loves you. He knows every hair on your head… He knitted you in your Mother’s womb. You are precious to Him . I am going to pray for you. May God Bless you and your family 🙏🏽🙌🏽☝🏾
@QuestionThingsUseLogic11 ай бұрын
@@BubbylovesJesus there's no evidence jesus existed. He's based on Dionysus....a wine god.
@BubbylovesJesus10 ай бұрын
@@QuestionThingsUseLogic , Jesus changed TIME ! He raised the dead… healed the sick..gave vision to the blind… casted out demons and so much more! These accounts were witnessed by thousands. No one else has ever done what Jesus did and still does.
5 ай бұрын
@@BubbylovesJesus that is all made up bullshit. Little children need to believe that, not adults.
@LittleImpaler3 жыл бұрын
I wanted to watch this earlier, but it wouldn't let me.