Why didn't they know Pharaohs name ? I don't

Calling the travel brochure writer Josephus a Historian is a huge stretch.

We use words for phenomena. Solstice is hugely important as a cosmic point of reference. Imagine not having a solstice (nor weird explicit earthly moon). Then what is time? A gazillion days. If you're not on a locked planet. Because then it's just endless sun. Imagine their religions.

Philip II of Macedon, Alexander s father went a long way explaining why Macedonians are Greeks, when someone said that they were outsiders. So nowadays with all do respect you cannot say the Macedonians and the Greeks, the same way you cannot say the Athenians and the Greeks , or the Spartans and the Greeks. You can say thought the Macedonians and the rest of the Greeks. Because the Hellenistic era is when the Macedonians export their culture, the Hellenic one. By the way Macedonian is in Greece and the country called Republic of North Macedonia is the ancient Paeonia, which is not known if they were Greeks, Dalmatians or Thrace tribes

Hey guys, I really appreciate the value of questioning things and critically engaging with history. It’s so important to be honest with ourselves, to carefully consider all points, and to rely on truly accurate historical sources. This, of course, means being truthful with your community and always open and transparent about everything. I’m going to try and do exactly that here with my epistemic approach. For example, I’d love to dive into many of the points you raised in this video, but since it’s two hours long, addressing every single point would completely blow up the comments section. So instead, I’ll focus on just one specific topic-the discussion around Christmas and December 25. The question regarding the originality of December 25 as the birth date of Jesus Christ or as the festival of Sol Invictus is a central point of historical debate. To clarify this issue, we need to consider both the earliest physically tangible manuscripts and the context of their transmission. About Sol Invictus: The cult of Sol Invictus was officially introduced in Rome by Emperor Aurelian around AD 270-275. Coins and inscriptions from this period honor the god, yet none of these sources explicitly mention December 25 as his festival day. This date’s connection to Sol Invictus is not directly stated in the Chronographia Anni CCCLIIII. The Roman festival calendar designates December 25 as Natalis Invicti (“Birthday of the Unconquered”), without specifically naming the god Sol Invictus. Here are a few facts about the Chronographia Anni CCCLIIII. The claimed original from the “year 354” no longer exists. The oldest physical manuscript containing the mention Natalis Invicti dates from the 8th or 9th century and is a copy of the supposed lost Chronographia of 354. There is no older tangible document that explicitly associates Sol Invictus with December 25. This connection was only made later by medieval scholars. About Jesus: In the same Chronographia Anni CCCLIIII, which (as mentioned) is claimed to be the original chronicle from the year 354, there is a Roman festival calendar noting: “Natus Christus in Betleem Iudeae” (“Christ was born in Bethlehem in Judea”). The calendar is part of a larger collection compiled by a scribe named Furius Dionysius Philocalus, who was commissioned by Pope Liberius. However, it is logically evident that the earliest surviving copies of this text also date from the 8th or 9th century. From a purely logical standpoint, both traditions are based on the same Chronographia and are thus formally equal in that regard, since the original document is lost. However, there is a decisive difference. The data suggests that December 25 as the birth date of Jesus Christ is historically better attested than its link to Sol Invictus. While both traditions trace back to the same lost chronicle, Christ is mentioned explicitly, whereas Sol Invictus was only added later as an interpretive figure. A physically existing manuscript specifically identifying December 25 as the birthday of Sol Invictus does not exist to date. The connection between Natalis Invicti and Sol Invictus was later established by historians’ interpretations, but is not directly documented by an ancient manuscript. Additional noteworthy points: Winter Solstice: In late antiquity, December 25 fell close to the winter solstice, which offered many cults (including solar cults) a symbolic point of reference.Saturnalia and Other Festivals: Around the same time, the popular Saturnalia festival took place. It is possible that there were overlaps and mutual influences among various festivals. Early Christian Sources: Some early Christian authors, such as Hippolytus of Rome (3rd century), already mentioned December 25 as the birth date of Christ. These claims are contested and not always clearly verified, but they show that the idea of December 25 as a Christmas date existed within early Christianity. Symbolism Instead of Direct Adoption: Even if parallels can be drawn to sun worship, that does not necessarily prove that the Christmas date was directly “adopted” or “copied.” Instead, symbolic and calendrical considerations could have played a role without a definite festival designation such as “Sol Invictus Day.”

God is everywhere. Nothing exists outside of God.

Water is to be reborn in water. Satan thought it was amniotic fluid of a woman. Satan had no idea that Jesus is the Living Water

So all of sudden you 2 are experts you guys sound angry and critical and are experts on manuscripts ECT... Your trying to destroy God's word be very careful the sword can come upon you 2 faith it's a cover up and you 2detectives have solved this scandlous case good work Sherlock

COME FACE TO FACE WITH THIS MAN SO EVERY ONE CAN SEE😅.

Now I will ask any teacher, any rabbi any scholar about Genesis chapter 4 verse 17 no one has ever given me a significant answer that I can understand He found it the city of nod And then took a wife from where.

It is Revelation- not Revelations. As one got carried away and labeled it. Why is such a simple singular word, getting the ‘s or a’? It reminds me when the old people say they are going to Krogers, or Walmarts!

Absolutely, he is yet another know it all, who knows, nothing 😮 another human being filled with the desire to be proven correct yet proves himself wrong.😂 This is why most people quickly notice the faults within the Bible... the inconsistency of the gospel.😢

WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND KARMA ALWAYS WINS😅.

OBTW, Ch 10. 32 They were on their way up to Jerusalem, with Jesus leading the way, and the disciples were astonished, while those who followed were afraid. Again he took the Twelve aside and told them what was going to happen to him. 33 “We are going up to Jerusalem,” he said, “and the Son of Man will be delivered over to the chief priests and the teachers of the law. They will condemn him to death and will hand him over to the Gentiles, 34 who will mock him and spit on him, flog him and kill him. Three days later he will rise.” If Jesus was full of &^&&*, I'm totally sure Mark would write a book telling ALL OF THE STORY BUT THE END. Don't be deceived. Read Against Heresies.

Why does the greater Israel include the Nile Valley? Is the Pharaon Aka Nata one God theory possible to have something to do with Israel?

Theology Wars the return of the bible

Funny content

If Paul was wrong, then God was wrong. And since God cannot be wrong , then Rabbi Singer is in perpetual error. And all those who stoop to his bidding, are complete fools. Take a hike.

trash video

All Messiahs are Hebrew, and all Messiahs free the Hebrew people politically.

You both are dont know what your talking about. Don't debate huff because he would destroy you. First book was written 60 years for Jesus death. Your also get Peter and Paul confused

Good video anyone with a clear mind can see that Wes Huff is no different from Billy Carson , I noticed that immediately because he picks and chooses his facts

Hi. Just a something to ponder. Wes Huff talks exactly like taylor swift.😅 Does wes have ”disney programming” too?🤔

Invite him on for a debate !! Based on your analysis it should be an easy win for you… Right?

If Jesus resurrected and was witnessed to walk through walls then why did he move the stone from infront the Tomb to leave the tomb instead of just walking through the wall of the tomb like he was seen walking through walls ?

Debate

It's too easy. You can check what Wes says no problem. He's not lying but the minows will try to knock him down for views.

Empty spaces at the end, because that is why it is called the end, you can imagine what you want but you need proof not COULD HAVES, WOULD HAVES AND SUCH!!

What goes around comes around p be careful when you're talking about God

These are lames too 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 only the KJV is God's word

Apologetics is institutionalized sophistry, and they don't even try to hide it. Pathetic.

Finally people are waking up. Wes Huff is a fraud, fake research and trying to get a Rep for bagging others like Billy Carson for their status 🔥

Debate him

Why try to devide christians? This looks like another holywood production going around in circles, too much drama. The Bible is far from what you are trying to accomplish.

Invite Wes Huff and debate him if you dare. Don't shamelessly rant here with your nonsensical made up stuffs.

As a Christian Mystic he never fooled me. The Bible is parable. P.S I belong to the Old Apostolic Church of South Africa and so 2000% a Christian but 20 000% a Mystic.

Here are names of Gods throughout history that were said to have been born by a virgin on 25th December. HORUS An Ethiopian-Sudanese God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 3,000 YEARS before Jesus. BUDDHA A Nepal God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 563 YEARS before Jesus. KRISHNA An Indian God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 900 YEARS before Jesus. ZARATHUSTRA An Iranian God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 1,000 YEARS before Jesus. HERCULES A Greek God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 800 YEARS before Jesus. MITHRA A Persian God, born 25th December, by a Virgin- 600 YEARS before Jesus. DIONYSUS A Greek God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 500 YEARS before Jesus. THAMMUZ A Babylonian God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 400 YEARS before Jesus. HERMES A Greek God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 200 YEARS before Jesus. ADONIS A Phoenician God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 200 YEARS before Jesus. JESUS CHRIST A Roman God, born 25th December, by a Virgin around 1-30 AD.

He shouldn't waist his time debating you. He was addressing the part of you statement that asserts the physical resurrection is only an an idea that arose much later. By focusing on Mark's unique account and falsely stating that the other accounts are embellishments that arise much later, you're denying one of the most well established facts, if not the most well established historical one. By the way who wrote the book of Acts? Who wrote the opening of Acts. Wasn't the writer of ACts walking around when Mark did?

🤣🤣😂 Projection much... Contact him.

Ewww weee - hard unsub. Actually, I was never subbed, but… Yeah. Dorked out mouth breathing here.

So wait so some2 are lying right so you tell me what the hell is the truth does any1 know really at all any1 .. WOW man!!!

I agree with Billy on this we live on an insane asylum every single human suffers a mental illness if you haven’t grasp that idk wat else to tell ya

I believe when you have to go to school for the learning then all your doing is just getting indoctrinated.... Just walk with JESUS people live well & treat your neighbors as family... JUST WAKE UP!!!