Did Young Girls Damage Neighbor’s Cars? | Part 1

[@Fruitsandveggiesmama]

I think I get what he's saying though. He recognized them as neighborhood children, knew where they came from in general but couldn't have identified which was which girl.

[@SMH-v1q]

That’s what I was thinking as well.

[@Zee-ob1pe]

In court , you have to be very clear with what you’re saying

[@Fruitsandveggiesmama]

@@Zee-ob1pe agreed. I hope I never go to court because I can't form clear sentences to defend myself against my own parents 😅

[@mariesmith1616]

Absolutely that’s what he was saying.

[@emeraldadam7454]

Exactly what I was going to say, because she asked if it were the girls present and he said he can't recognize them.

[@thomasludwig9117]

Good to see their witness was well prepared and had his story all worked out...NOT!

[@charlieb1976]

He's trying his best not to say it's because they're black

[@cocosexc2106]

Exactly. They are probably the only little black girls in the neighborhood

[@16MedicRN]

​@@cocosexc2106can't sound r@cist 😂

[@nora4981]

Lol, the plaintiff probably told him to say their skin color … he’s probably annoyed that there are black people in a predominantly Hispanic neighborhood

[@16MedicRN]

@@nora4981 not annoyed. Why woule he be? You saying one minority is r@cist? You put yourself out there, child. What do you have to say? Shameful. Guaranteed how you voting and you pretend to care about everyone else, when the only person you care about is you. Regardless of any hardship, or background. Isn't that how people use to judge you? 6ouve learned very little from your mama or daddy.

[@Hudpix16]

😂

[@drucella5581]

The witness needs to say, " I saw three little blacks girls"...JJ " how to do you know it was them" ..? "They are the only black kids in our neighborhood." Periodt. Tell the truth, shame the devil.

[@joecrawford172]

I get the feeling their witness could f*ck up a cup of coffee.

[@rdl8878]

Agreed.

[@eboneeprice9908]

😂

[@Kbrown2018]

Whenever it’s a case with children, They’re usually guilty 😭😂

[@sunnystormy4973]

my kids have paws ... 🐾 tap or click ...

[@jefferyhartwell9102]

Pretty much

[@Datrumptroll]

Wrong!! They’re always fuvkin guilty

[@trekgirl65]

Not all the time, just less.....

[@zuritribe4844]

@@Datrumptroll right

[@scottmcwave9479]

Plaintiff better have more proof than this witness!

[@michellepanana865]

lunch crew check in time hahahaha

[@dawnsparks9207]

Just about to have dinner ,19.40 have a good day for everyone having lunch🥙

[@dawnsparks9207]

Sorry I forgot to say I am in London

[@gooberstv8995]

Yuuurrrrip

[@anapinheiro4583]

🎉🎉🎉🎉hi

[@sunnystormy4973]

upload ... ?

[@57848]

Parents..Teach yr kids Honesty!!

[@shummykujiamimi4687]

Plaintiffs, make sure your witnesses are honest. The children haven’t been asked a question in this video. There’s no indication that they are anything besides honest.

[@Wayniesgirl]

​@@shummykujiamimi4687No, but we can surmise they have denied it.

[@stephanieyee9784]

They did it. It may not have been done intentionally or maliciously, but they did it. They know it, their mother knows it, you know it and I know it.

[@SHANELL032007]

How? you weren't there

[@xubarze]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/r5K2Zol_fNiGZqc

[@chrismcadam8413]

That was literally one of the best cases I've seen in a long time, the faces dropped to the floor when they saw the video

[@FeliciaDaniel]

This witness messed up everything 😂😂😂😂😂

[@weeniehutjunior]

to be fair, JJ is splitting hairs with the witness. How many groups of 3 little girls of the approximate same build and age are playing together in that neighborhood? It's not a huge logical leap to say "hey you might want to talk to defendant's daughter (and friends) because I'm fairly sure I saw them playing around your car earlier."

[@nora4981]

Her questions are legitimate. The witness should’ve have seen those exact girls doing the exact damage the plaintiff claims they did. I don’t understand why you’re bothered.

[@Meoknet]

@@nora4981 No, she is indeed splitting hairs because we have children in my district and I can identify my neighbour's children from far even if I can't see their faces because they all move in a group and there's no other group of children that fit that configuration in the district. So I might not be able to tell you which individual child did what but I can tell you that I just Mr. Thing's children going somewhere or doing something.

[@DanielleA2023]

Law is about facts NOT assumptions & past experiences

[@Meoknet]

@@DanielleA2023 It is but Judge Judy is not a judge, despite the name of the show; she's an independent arbitrator. She herself has told litigants before that the burden of proof required in her "Courtroom" is less than in an actual court. That's one of the reasons shows like this exist; for cases which would be too difficult to prove in a normal court. Here, you just have to convince Judy, and she says often that her "life experience" has taught her what things are likely true and what things are likely fibs, so let's not pretend that these cases rely solely on law and not on Judy's common sense and judgement as well.

[@bengochea64]

Well said 💯​@@nora4981

[@lovely-777]

This guy is messing it up for the plaintiff

[@phDST1913]

the witness just doesn't want to say skin color was the reason he put it together that it was the neighbor... sigh.. it's already known. just say what you were thinking mr. witness instead of dancing around it...

[@Hudpix16]

Yeah I mean how outrageous that someone saw three black girls possibly scratching a car and then thought it was the same three black girls who live in the neighbor’s house.

[@phDST1913]

@@Hudpix16 sigh. just had to go left with it, didn't you? you always do. smh

[@Wayniesgirl]

​@Hudpix16 You mean the same three black girls that he probably sees every day? 🙄

[@phDST1913]

@@Wayniesgirl yet he didnt say that....

[@Wayniesgirl]

@@phDST1913 Actually, in the following video he does

[@annabethsmith-kingsley2079]

Sounds like this guy is too cowardly to say why he recognized these children

[@Touchthepancake]

Tf does that even mean?

[@annabethsmith-kingsley2079]

@@Touchthepancake he needed to say "I saw three black girls" and he chickened out because in the usa just saying people are black is considered racist for some reason

[@Touchthepancake]

@@annabethsmith-kingsley2079 don’t be stupid

[@maximus7079]

Ironically, it's not proof for the same reasons he didn't want to say. Simply seeing 3 black girls without seeing their face is in no way proof that 3 black girls you know was those 3 girls. Sorry, being the same race means squat.

[@annabethsmith-kingsley2079]

@@Touchthepancake I'm trying

[@alfreddavis9116]

I love his glasses. People need to watch their children better.

[@nora4981]

Bet you he barely watched his child

[@robbymarton74]

Horrible Witness

[@zkarebear]

20 sec in and already the plaintiffs are looking good. Short non embellished answers 👍 looking good

[@TimeisUp22]

2 min in, witness tanked the case.

[@anthoneymahateva5851]

The witness did put two and two together and I have no doubt that he was NOT mistaken, in his conclusion.

[@Tecproductions]

I’m sure the witness of the plaintiff didn’t want to say it, but the kids were probably the only black kids on the street. But he was afraid to say black, because everyone gets so offended nowadays

[@lovejones92]

As a black woman I have to agree. He’s tap dancing around how he identifies them because he probably thinks if he identifies them by their race he’ll be crucified for it and there’s no reason to do it. These little girls are black and if they’re the only little black girls in their area it is what it is 🤷🏽‍♀️. As long as he’s not being disrespectful or rude about it I personally don’t see what the issue would be with that.

[@nora4981]

Not sure why you’re bothered. He could’ve said that and nobody would’ve been offended. I mean there’s worse things that have been said and done to black people, look at what Koreans do.

[@loxsannbraham8281]

Yep . A patron got kicked out of my job because he didn’t know my name & described me as “the black girl”. I’m the only black girl at my job soo it was the the fastest way to identify me

[@robbymarton74]

Horrible witness

[@b.dailey3180]

I don't believe his witness saw anything.

[@ghostdragon5735]

Explain

[@monicavillarreal3902]

@@b.dailey3180 I believe he saw the little girls and just two and two together. Unfortunately that may not be enough.

[@b.dailey3180]

@@monicavillarreal3902 Then by definition you're not a witness.

[@timothyhh]

@@b.dailey3180 I think he saw the girls where and when he said he did, butt the part about seeing "hand motions" is BALONEY. He and the plaintiff know that seeing them near a car that was later discovered to be damaged isn't enough, so this bit about hand motions is added in.

[@DIDYOUSEETHAT172]

1:14 I'm guessing these gentlemen have watched Judy, not volunteering the witness just answering what is asked. That is how you do it. .. SO far! And Kids lie, not because they are evil, (most of the time 😁) they don't want the disapproval that goes along with messing up.

[@jamesr1703]

She knows her kids did it. Why not just take responsibility?

[@ChrisCosat]

Parents taking accountability for their crotch goblins? Yeah, right.

[@jennifer_mertens]

So three OTHER little girls blew into the neighborhood and decided to scratch up a car right next to the house where the 3 little girls of the same exact height/weight/hair live? He may not have clearly seen their exact facial features--but come on, you can tell who a person is by their height/age and weight, etc. If there was another group of 3 little girls in another nearby house(with the EXACT same description), I could understand not making the stretch. I don't think that is the case though. You can positively identify someone without being close enough to see "the whites of their eyes".

[@scottmcwave9479]

Judge Judy is leaning hard on this guy! 😃

[@timothyhh]

Nah, she asked a simple question - "Did you recognize any of the little girls?" - and he started equivocating right away.

[@azielaugust8349]

@@timothyhh he told judge judy already he did not recognize face. But he knew it was them. Judge Judy is just being arrogant again. It Is like noticing your friend from afar you don't see their face but you see them regularly that you know it them based on there body type and movement.

[@Calypso-22]

The mom already fessed up, WTF?

[@Fotosynthesis858]

Those little girls are LIARS. And they learned it from their MOM smh. Some people just don’t deserve to be parents 🤦🏽‍♂️

[@Momo-po5tn]

All he had to say is: 'Yes, i assumed it was her children, but i didnt see their faces'

[@alphashanahan4323]

Even if he could not see their faces, he could still recognize who they were. I am sure he is familiar with how the gils look from a distance. They were neighbors, for goodness’ sake. I think JJ forgot that. It is not as of he was just a passing visitor in the neighbourhood.

[@zkarebear]

I appreciate how judge Judy acts as prosecutor to both sides.

[@JonCampos-kh2bw]

Did JJ really say,”Your answers is important”??

[@suroyaanjum1801]

The mother is awful woman, she is teaching her children to lie and to lie to the judge in the court of law, absolutely disgusting behavior. The woman needs parenting lessons

[@Wayniesgirl]

I think what he meant when he initially said that was that he didn't pay attention to which one was which

[@brucewallner6753]

I hope Judge Judy doesn’t swing and miss on this one slam dunk guilty beyond a reasonable doubt

[@jilliantaylor9582]

Gday and Good morning JJ fans- 7am down under Australia ☕☕

[@lazkid220]

JJ is just trying to see if he is being honest or trying to make it sound better for the plaintiff

[@dabariespence2582]

Foolish witness

[@thisgurlownsgames843]

Heyyy lunch crew 🫶🏽🥳

[@edwindelgado8775]

JJ knows he's talking about the same 3kids she's just playing devil's advocate 😄

[@AJafterhourz]

I haven’t watched the rest of this parts to this case, but I think what the witness to the plaintiff meant was he couldn’t see their faces as in he could tell which of the two girls were leaning against the car; not that he couldn’t see who they were, period. Also, he looks like he’s holding back trying to say the REAL reason why it had to be those girls 🙄

[@Yourock123]

Their children out here vandalizing cars while their grown adults ppl are out here looting designer stores & gas stations & burning down cities. Talk about the apples not falling far from the trees. I said what I said.

[@Guttex]

This judge is SOOOO biased. She asking specific questions just to get answers she want to hear, and when she dont get answers she want, she saying she dont belive witness. Also, she got written statement that defendant admitting her daughter scratched cars and she will pay for damages and at that moment it should be closed case, but No, she still was trying find something weaken plaintiff. This judge is a joke...

[@queenbee3647]

Shes a liberal.

[@ChrisCosat]

​@queenbee3647 what r u talking about, 🤡? She actively endorsed rhe Republicun* Nikki Haley in the primaries. Typical ignorant MAGAT. 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@delanac1809]

Woot woot🎉

[@EpicEmpireReviews]

Very interest

[@carolrivera1229]

The plaintiff is so fine 😭

[@QueenDeeBLOCK]

That witness is kinda shakey so far

[@JudgeDionteTavarColeman]

the defendant child is a lie knowing the defendant mother shouldn't be responsible the damage car if the plaintiff was shock

[@91PHS10]

You make no sense

[@apollonia-ava]

???

[@NaibAmer]

On the photograph who see blue car

[@Lowlow5900]

I think he meant he couldn’t identify who was on the bike exactly not that he couldn’t identify them

[@NicoleT46]

Part 1 plaintiff witnesses is lying trying to get some money.

[@randyallen8213]

Witness trying to change his testimony. Not a good look my friend. 🤦‍♂️

[@GlennCarver]

Mister Miyagi……….

[@benjaminperez1149]

To quote JJ - " If a kid is talking, they're lying."

[@caseyking0917]

She usually attributes that phrase to teenagers but presumably it rings true also for littler kids.

[@benjaminperez1149]

@@caseyking0917 Guess you haven’t watched the show that long.

[@caseyking0917]

@@benjaminperez1149 I’ve watched it for decades. She usually asks “how do you know when a teenager is lying?” Answer - when their mouth is moving.

[@gingercake0907]

@@caseyking0917 I agree. I have watched her show the entire 25 years and now watch the re runs. She says you can tell when a teenager is lying, their lips are moving. I have not heard her say that about small children. The mom lied about watching them from the kitchen and she lied in front of her children. It’s too bad .

[@gingercake0907]

@@benjaminperez1149 I have watched her show for 25 years and the re runs and she usually says that about teenagers. She has caught some younger children tell a fib I recall an episode involving small children and a dog bite. The defendant wanted a do over for her son but didn’t get it.

[@jrewing1512]

Normally Judge Judy excuse the children.

[@Esther-lm6pm]

No. I've seen a show where rocks were thrown at a car. Mom had to pay

[@medigoomnis]

Faces are literally the only way to identify people. I'm sure it was 3 girls the same size with identical hair that came to impersonate the neighbor girls, actually. Oh JJ...

[@Emriv]

I don’t know why people are so afraid to say BLACK 🤦🏽‍♀️

[@briel7904]

Usless witness

[@cescisco]

he shld have just said "ethnicity."

[@randymcnaughton4318]

Just upload the full case in one part yall. Not sure if you’re trying to milk advertisement revenue or what but it makes it extremely hard to watch while working…

[@Lenasevilla-yb4ei]

Yes she’s milking advertising duh🙄

[@randymcnaughton4318]

@@Lenasevilla-yb4ei it’s not judge judy who uploads these videos tho :/ it’s a group of nerds. I don’t think judge judy needs the money anyway!

[@brandi402]

Its because of copyright

[@randymcnaughton4318]

@@brandi402 How can it be copyrighted when the youtube is owned by the same people that produce the tv show?

[@Eros4tw]

Still missing Part 2 of that Computer Class case kzbin.info/www/bejne/kKmlpYmarZaWepI

[@Esther-lm6pm]

It's part THREE everyone is looking for the conclusion

[@gooberstv8995]

@@Esther-lm6pm i thought i was the only one waiting lol

[@C0okieman2009]

Witness needs to be sentenced to life without possibility of parole!!

[@lilylilo23]

🤣🤣🤣

[@Day-Day19]

🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@Angela-xe1gz]

Just say they’re the only black kids on the street 😅

[@SpeckszDaBoss]

Judge Judy crew aren’t we glad that bird isn’t with Judy anymore. He’s literally as useful as a brick

[@jeannethompson4048]

No 🙄

[@shummykujiamimi4687]

Sorry but Byrd was comedic gold. He and JJs interactions were always hilarious. Crossword puzzles and all.

[@phDST1913]

@@SpeckszDaBoss what do you expect him to do? thats what they do in his role everywhere? I'm curious what should he be doing...tell us

[@Sonny-ci4eh]

JJ is at it again...she's setting up a scenario that might not connect the kids to the vandalism. She is always trying to get out of paying for the actors in her show.

[@nora4981]

Imagine a grown man accusing babies of “vandalizing” his car 😂

[@HelloHollylynn]

They don’t look like babies to me

[@buzzkillington1719]

They aren’t babies

[@nora4981]

@@HelloHollylynnok koreaboo

[@nora4981]

@@buzzkillington1719of course they’re not babies to you, they’re black and your kind doesn’t see black peoples as humans lol

[@nora4981]

@@buzzkillington1719of course they’re not, your “kind” doesn’t see black people as human

[@colors5778]

That witness is a lair 🤥🤥🤥and can't be trusted 😮 that's why innocent people go to jail because someone always lying 🤥 and said they seen that person do the crime and it's not the person that did smh🤦🏿‍♀️.😎

[@monicavillarreal3902]

Yea right. Those little girls are guilty. Future criminals.

[@LDN9]

Part 2?