What Really Happened To Aer Lingus Flight 712? (Tuskar Rock Disaster) - DISASTER BREAKDOWN

If you found this video to be interesting, be sure to subscribe as there is a new video every Saturday. This video also went out to my Patrons on Patreon 48 hours before going out publicly. Consider joining here from £1 per month: / disasterbreakdown
Twitter: / chloe_howiecb
Music/Personal Channel: / @chloehowie
Twitch: / chloe_canaria
Aer Lingus Flight 712
Today we’re going to be talking about a very tragic accident that Occurred over the Irish Sea, Aer Lingus Flight 712. If there is one country we don’t get to talk about all too often on this channel, it’s Ireland. Ireland’s aviation safety record is very admirable. The small country in North West Europe, in the last half century, has only ever seen one fatal plane crash and it didn’t even involve an Irish Airline. Before this period however, Ireland suffered its fair share of air accidents as with many nations adjusting to the new age of passenger air travel.
Ireland’s deadliest air disaster occurred on March 24th, 1968. Aer Lingus Flight 712 is certainly interesting as the cause of the accident was never fully determined, and is a perfect case study of an accident in that category and how a small country which had just suffered such a horrifying loss deals with that. When discussing this disaster we naturally have to tread into the uneasy territory of… theoretical possibilities and speculation. One theory even brings up uncomfortable questions about what Ireland’s neighbor was doing that day. Let’s examine the possibilities and see if we can shed some light on the mystery of flight 712.
00:00 Intro
1:35 The Flight
10:00 Initial Investigation
14:04 The Part Where It Gets Interesting
22:12 What The Heck Is A Jindivik?
28:27 Closing
Sources:
www.aaiu.ie/sit...
www.aaiu.ie/sit...
www.aaiu.ie/sit...
www.aaiu.ie/sit...
web.archive.or...
www.buzz.ie/tv...
simpleflying.c...
www.1001crash....
• Tragedy At Tuskar Rock...
aviation-safet...
aviation-safet...
www.baaa-acro....
www.vickersvisc...
www.theguardia...
www.milfordmar...
• Aileron & Spring Tab! ...

[@DisasterBreakdown]

If you found this video to be interesting, be sure to subscribe as there is a new video every Saturday. This video also went out to my Patrons on Patreon 48 hours before going out publicly. Consider joining here from £1 per month: www.patreon.com/DisasterBreakdown Twitter: twitter.com/Chloe_HowieCB

[@birgenair301]

I liked this video, and I'm subscribed, also a sugestion, ariana 1998 afghan airlines boeing 727 crash or KAM air 904 please

[@someonee3186]

Suggestion, you can do a recreation of the Hainan island incident, where a United States air Force P-3 Orion had collided with a People's Liberation Air Force J-8II.

[@jaki8739]

@Jack’s epic gaming it takes months for requests to be made …. Plus there’s a list try asking if it’s on the list rather than demanding it

[@VishalGauba]

The storytelling was a bit too here and there I think. A lot of jumping around

[@LemonLadyRecords]

Really great and well organized report, as usual! I like that you discuss the possibilities out there, without going conspiracy theory. RIP the victims and hope the families get closure. But, spending £ on an old accident, of a plane no longer flying, with no applicable safety improvements, is sadly unlikely. Calling all billionaires...

[@martinross5521]

I used to fly in these Aer Lingus Viscounts from Bristol to Cork and back around 1968 and 1969. One time the bar and drinks had to be removed to get down to take off weight for the then shorter runway at Bristol. I was in the back row with the stewardess across the aisle. She was gripping the armrests so tight her knuckles were white. As we went down the runway, I thought “if she’s worried, maybe I should be too”. I’m amazed that one third of Viscounts failed in one way or another. That’s the key fact from a really well produced story, thank you. Now a subscriber, as my Viscount flights didn’t take me out 53 years ago… 😱

[@Shamrock100]

Your impression about Viscount losses is incorrect. Losses were due to many factors, of which structural or design issues was only one. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accidents_and_incidents_involving_the_Vickers_Viscount

[@bradsanders407]

I'm amazed only a 1/3 crashed.

[@stanislavkostarnov2157]

@@bradsanders407 also, in the days most of the viscounts operated, it was not an unusual rate of losses.... especially for remoter routes. we see some of the converted classes actually lose all of the planes in the class to accidents... planes are expensive, in a ruined post-war Europe, or the newly freed colonies, you simply flew it until it failed.

[@Classickoolcars]

Lucky……

[@davidogorman7808]

Captain made a call that he lost a propellor

[@LeeAirVideos]

I have to correct you regarding the Jindivik. It was never intended to be shot down; at a million Pounds each, that would be expensive. They were used to tow targets which we’re trailed behind the Jindivik; that is why they were painted orange and yellow to avoid being shot down. You may also note the Jindivik had a skid underneath its fuselage which allowed it to land back at its launch base and be reused. It was launched from a trailer which it detached itself from once airborne. They were indeed UAV’s and were occasionally lost.

[@Dan-oj4iq]

Lee Air: This is actually a pretty big correction. Thank you for that information.

[@scallopohare9431]

Trying not to be snarky, but military is not accustomed to budget considerations. I would rule this out based solely on the day of the week.

[@richardvernon317]

@@scallopohare9431 The Drones were not operated by the Military, but by the Royal Aircraft Establishment. All of the Operators and support staff at Llanbedr were Civilian contractors or Civil Servants. They do not work on Sundays

[@scallopohare9431]

@@richardvernon317 Well, yes, the Sunday bit is why I would rule that theory out. Not sure what info was provided about the group that shot down the drones. Military is the most likely, so that's what I went with.

[@HappyBeezerStudios]

@@scallopohare9431 Oh they totally are. Why spend a billion to buy 20 expensive planes when it can be used to buy 50 cheaper planes. And "military quality" basically means sourced from the cheapest contractor that just fulfills the requirements.

[@sunnyfon9065]

“12,000 feet, descending, spinning rapidly.” Damn, this is the scary thing to hear from a plane as an ATC or a pilot of other aircraft. It feels like watching a horror movie.

[@DisasterBreakdown]

I couldn't even begin to imagine what that was like. Horrifying.

[@davesmith5656]

People tend to communicate too little. A bit more detail would have been helpful. That flight from Colombia to NYC that kept asking for "priority" never really shouted "Hey! We're on FUMES here! Either we get down in five minutes or we crash land in someone's back yard!" (I think it was an Avianca flight - a few video have been made about it.)

[@sarahmacintosh6449]

Fabulous video about a horrifying and thoroughly mysterious crash. Thank you!

[@RBMapleLeaf]

@@davesmith5656 Yes that Avianca Flight 52 Chloe did before. Wonder has made a more detailed video about but Chloe makes it simple getting all detail elaborated in at least 15 minutes. In fact, Avianca Flight 52 cause was due to fuel starvation but it’s disputed who were at fault. Yes the pilots not giving enough detail and ATC not being able to discern the message. The same with American 965 which Chloe has also done before except vice versa. In fact, American Airlines for their South American routes gave their pilots special training but even that wasn’t enough although it wasn’t necessary. However, it was an added warning if you know what I’m saying.

[@adotintheshark4848]

@@RBMapleLeaf a similar accident happened at Portland International in 1979. The pilots ran the plane out of fuel trying to decide if the landing gear was down or not.

[@35mmShowdown]

This one was worth the wait! Normally unsolved investigations and pre-digital flight recorder events are a bit of a let down, but you really made this really riveting! Amazing work as usual, C.

[@DisasterBreakdown]

Thank you so much for your kind comment

[@marhawkman303]

@@DisasterBreakdown Honestly? I suspect we'll never know. the idea that maybe part of the tail broke off is... plausible. It'd cause a massive loss of control, and explain how people saw something fall out of the sky. we can't prove it's the "right" explanation but it seems most likely. I do have to wonder about the breakup of the craft in general... it seems to have almost turned into confetti after hitting the water.

[@jaws848]

​@@DisasterBreakdownthank you Chloe for covering this...as someone from Dublin,Ireland and an aviation nut job i found this very intresting.👍👍👍👍

[@OscarOSullivan]

⁠@@DisasterBreakdownI think the lighthouse keepers who were manning the Tuskar rock lighthouse at the time of the crash if they are still alive would be good witnesses.

[@brotakig1531]

I've watched all your videos Chloe but this is on a whole nother level. Not because we have the answers, it's because we don't, and you go through all the possible tragic things that could have happened but ultimately it wouldn't change the fact of what happened. You should be very proud of this video.

[@mias4150]

@@BuddhaofBlackpool this is colloquial speech, and an example of a linguistic phenomenon known as tmesis, or infixing. no need to correct speech there, just look it up!

[@B3Band]

@@BuddhaofBlackpool You think you're showing everyone how smart you are by knowing that "nother" isn't a word, but in reality you're showing how stupid you are for not knowing a very basic, very standard phrase in colloquial English.

[@Belltogo3000]

Who is Chloe?

[@danielnovitadubin8272]

@@Belltogo3000 the narrator.

[@brotakig1531]

@@Belltogo3000 The lovely womans voice you are listening too.

[@richardshiggins704]

Excellent graphics . I lived in Wexford at that time and remember the incident so very well . I was 12 years old . My father , a doctor at the time had to review the few remains washed up on the beach . He never witnessed such carnage . I think it was due to horizontal stabiliser separation in flight or general structural weakness .

[@efnissien]

The Jindivik story is easily discredited - all training facilities were closed at the weekend. Even now RAF Valley (the fast jet training facility on Anglesey) is still closed at the weekend. Vicount's had an issue with their rear doors that opened outwards and were hinged on the rear - so that when the door failed, it would open get caught in the slipstream and fly open - to act like an airbrake, before tearing off and striking the horizontal stabilizer.

[@jeromemccormick833]

Hi thanks for comment.Did the door fall into the sea?If as you state that the rear door failed this would be something very major, and would the door warning lamp activate in the cockpit fuselage layout to inform the pilot. These lamps are centrally situated in the cockpit .Cheers.

[@efnissien]

@@jeromemccormick833 I'm not aware of the door being recovered - most of the wreck is still on the seabed. But Viscounts did also have problems with metal fatigue. But there had been incidents of the door opening due to latch failure and several Viscounts went crashed over sea.

[@j.o.1516]

@@jeromemccormick833 I think there was one accident with a Viscount and one of the doors opening in flight. Its in the report of the 2000 study. I think it was in India and the crew managed to land the aircraft, even though the door did strike at least one propellor and the stab.

[@brody3166]

I think this is a more realistic hypothesis on what happened

[@Mary-wo5ln]

Why did some logbooks of the British disappear at this time? Why were there inconsistencies in others?

[@eliott.6997]

A very mysterious accident... I hope one day the answers will be found. Thoughts and feelings go out to those families who lost loved ones that day. Exceptional presentation as always, Chloe!

[@wilsjane]

The general feeling in Cork was that a missile was involved. The suggestion by UK ATC to take a shorter route always seemed strange and something not mentioned on the video was that the flight was delayed and crossing the Irish sea later than the times given to the military. The failure of the navy to locate the wreckage also added to the theory. Even if any of this was true, there has never been a suggestion that it was anything other than an unfortunate accident.

[@Mary-wo5ln]

​@@wilsjaneThis is very important information not given in the video.

[@wilsjane]

@@Mary-wo5ln If Airbus built a car, it would have 2 steering wheels and 2 sets of pedals. You would never give your mother inlaw a ride again. Joking aside, the airbus fly by wire system as well designed, incorporating many safety measures to avoid overstressing the limits of the aircraft design. However, if the captain wants to take over, he needs to tell the other pilot to release the controls. If not, the poor computer is averaging 3 sets of commands, with fairly obvious results. The other pilot can completely take over, by holding a button down for about 10 seconds, but in an emergency, that seems like an eternity. Most airlines using Airbus, instruct the pilot monitoring to only use verbal advice to the pilot flying and only take over if the pilot flying is incapacitated. Unfortunately, the importance of this often gets missed out in training Being separate, the controls also give redundancy if one set fail for any reason, but the other pilot needs to know to hold his button down for 10 seconds. Their is a video of the time when a pilots camera slid from alongside his seat and jammed his sidestick.

[@nuclear2970]

@@wilsjane Also the fact that the Jindivik was fully recovered with no signs of damage or an impact with a plane or a missile never sat right with me.

[@uzaiyaro]

Speaking of the Vickers Viscount, my grandmother was supposed to be on one that crashed in Winton, Queensland. Ansett-ANA flight 149. It was an in-flight fire that led to the structural failure of the wing. From then on she used to say “chance it with Ansett.”

[@reallynotyourbusiness1659]

1 crashed into botany bay back in the 60s as well.

[@Classickoolcars]

Shocking way to die. Poor buggers.

[@RobertMurphy-sx8lc]

We used to sat "Chance it with Ansett, or Try Another Airline (TAA)".

[@Aldairion]

Congratulations on your longest video yet! I really enjoyed the small cinematics and chapter breakdowns of this format. Excited to hear that an even bigger project is in the works!

[@andysix246]

I remember this accident very well, as an 11 year old boy obsessed with planes and dreaming of being a pilot, it had a lasting effect on me for many years. Thank you for bringing some clarity to the events of that terrible day. 🙏

[@user-me4dr7fu2e]

Before the release of this video, my favorite video was the South African Airways flight 295. The crash, the history and the mystery behind it was fascinating. This one goes BEYOND that. In fact, I would call this an EXCEPTIONAL one just based on the storytelling itself. Combined with all those historical details and mysteries in this video is one hell of an incredible work, it even gave me some goosebumps and gasps when hearing some intriguing, unbelievable yet realistic facts. I truly hope that we can get more stories like this- disastrous yet fascinating stories with unknown and little-known facts. Anyways, congrats on the longest and the most fascinating so far! I'll be looking forward for other stories that'll be here in the future.

[@DisasterBreakdown]

Thank you for your kind words. Thrilled you enjoyed the video!

[@JedenSiedemDwa]

I noticed something totally extraordinary in this video - namely, in 11:52 there is another Viscount visible behind Lingus EI-AKL. This is PLL "LOT" SP-LVA, which also crashed after mid-air breakup overy Jeuk in Belgium at 20.08.1965. There were no passengers on board, but crew of 4 perished in disaster. And once again - I'm still impressed by quality of the episode. ;)

[@emilycormeraie8858]

I fly out of Cork Airport several times a year. The original terminal still sits next to the modern one, now used for airport logistics. It’s harrowing to think it’s the last place those poor souls visited. Maybe I’ll drop a flower there next time I pass by. For them, and for those lost on the runway as well.

[@DisasterBreakdown]

I actually really like the old Cork Terminal. I think it has a very retro feel to it. Same goes for the older parts of Shannon Airport. Such style.

[@sunnyfon9065]

You are very respectful to the victims

[@desdicadoric]

That’s a nice thought.

[@emilycormeraie8858]

@@DisasterBreakdown I like that they kept it, and made some use of it. Same in Dublin, if you’re taking a Ryanair Flight, you have to walk the long way to the other side of the terminal, and get to see the old terminal there too, and it’s in great conditon

[@emilycormeraie8858]

@@sunnyfon9065 Of course, we should be

[@t.p.mckenna]

This film was wonderfully constructed, but it revived a whole series of tropes that have endured for too many years. First thing to say is, this is a crash which left so little evidence in its wake. A commonplace for the time, there was next to no data for the flight in an era without GPS, and flight recorders being far from prevalent. Similarly, there was just a partial recovery of the wreckage. Put another way, there was.a vacuum of evidence which, inevitably, produced no end of conspiracy theories. So, let me just throw in some counters which will add greater context to the story. One is not to make too much of Aer Lingus being a state airline and to dispel notions of Soviet style cover ups to counter any loss of face. As it was, it was all but an independent company, and small at that. The loss of an aircraft was not a good look, but hardly such as would bring about national shame. Two, a missile strike. Had it been struck by a missile, it's failure, surely, would have been a much more instantaneous affair, whereas it is suggested the plane flew for a further thirty minutes, and made it into the water, all but intact. Three, I'd suggest aircraft of the Viscount era were structurally prone to fatigue. They were technically good aircraft, but, as was very clear in the Comet story, there was inadequate R&D into the stresses and strains being placed on fuselages of the era. A failing that fed also into the Trident programme. Surely the loss of 25% of all Viscounts produced, says as much. One only has to think of the vibrations created by four large turbo props, all of which would feed into the frame. I flew in one once from Luton to Dublin when Virgin started a service in the 1988 - great fun, but not the place to be if one had loose fillings. Four, and finally, for the Jindivik speculation to have any merit, you'd have to accept the idea of a drone being way off where it should have been; a missile being fired that would have been in contravention of the MOD's range boundaries; and testing taking place on a day which was, provably, not on schedule - a Sunday. All too believable if anyone knows of life in services where the Sunday Morning Service is a North Star of all regiments, followed by a decent roast nosh up in the Mess. Therein lies the folly of conspiracies. They are dependent on too many facts being out of kilter to what could otherwise be expected. Here's a link to the 2000 report which reviewed all the original evidence and found it to be in accord with the declared findings of 1968. www.aaiu.ie/sites/default/files/report-attachments/03.Tuskar_AAIU_REVIEW_2000_Report_No2000-003.pdf The full truth of flight EI-AOM will probably never be known and maybe it's time to let the victims rest in peace. May their souls, and all the souls of the faithful departed, rest in peace.

[@bravetoss]

Scrolling all the way down for comments like this. While video is interesting and well executed, poor maintenance with some material or design flaw's is probably the root cause here.

[@martinross5521]

Thank you for your perspectives and conclusions - I agree with the probability of a structural failure. I often flew on Viscounts and they liked to shake and rattle a lot…

[@mukhtar__]

this turned out better than i've expected tbh. very very well done, Chloe!

[@DisasterBreakdown]

Thank you!

[@B3Band]

Wait, his name is Chloe? Like, female name in English and toilet in German?

[@mukhtar__]

@@B3Band her**

[@macwt]

Wait so the guy talking is not a guy??

[@sal-my1id]

@@macwt yeah, she's a woman

[@zakkzilla5255]

Extremely intriguing that you’ve covered this crash as the whereabouts were unknown. I recently flew with Aer Lingus back in April to Dublin Ireland with a final stop in Venice Italy. Because I have severe aviation phobia I looked up all Aer Lingus crashes and this was the only flight that came up. I’ve always wondered since then what happened. How ironic that you’ve answered all of the possible outcomes in this video. NICELY DONE! 💫😁

[@StellaMurano]

What a complex and intriguing story. Unfortunately, there are still more questions than clear answers. I watched a documentary about Pan Am Flight 7 around 3 weeks ago and from my point of view many details between those 2 accidents are very similar like for example delaying the investigation and dropping relevant proofs and pieces of information to maybe hide something uncomfortable for the airline itself. We would never know. Congrats on your longest video so far!

[@pooryorick831]

I really like your channel. I admit I have read about many of the accidents you report on over my 45 year fascination with air accidents. But I am still discovering more accidents learning things I never heard before on your channel. Thanks for the great content.

[@rilmar2137]

That last transmission sent shivers down my spine

[@j.o.1516]

Likely never happened. The eyewitness statements of almost 50 people contradict the findings of the 1970 report. The Viscount never reached FL170 or FL120 for that matter. It was in trouble after only 10 minutes into the flight. The much later report in 2002 explains how the accident probably happened to more than 90% certainty.

[@ramgopalan8625]

Never heard about this crash before Thanks for your indepth analysis

[@leebee1100]

I’m extremely proud of you Chloe! goosebumps throughout. Growth in your production qualities abound. It’s hard to say you’ve grown a huge amount because your content was beautifully produced and written from the very beginning. Much love and appreciation for your work ❤

[@eUK95]

The quality of your work is unbelievable. Thank you for putting so much effort in - its much appreciated. Subbed 👍

[@someoneinthecaucasus3232]

This deserves way more attention. The documentary is so well made. I was hooked at every second. Great job man.

[@light_rrr]

Chloe is a girl lol

[@someoneinthecaucasus3232]

@@light_rrr ddn't mean it in a gendered way, sorry

[@kamakaziozzie3038]

It’s maam

[@ADFeldbauer]

@@kamakaziozzie3038As was said the poster didn’t intend to offend anyone. Drop it

[@nyxqueenofshadows]

i really do enjoy these longer videos, and appreciate the work that goes into them! great video, as always :)

[@DisasterBreakdown]

Glad you like them!

[@jonahlloyd3149]

I always thought this accident was likely to be structural failure, for perspective I was a AD technician in the RAF and worked on Bloodhound Mk 2 missiles in the early 80s, so this accident was well known at Aberporth Range. In the couple of years I worked on Bloodhounds we used to take a missile to Aberporth once a year after it had been stripped to the airframe and rebuilt with brand new everything at huge expense. These were "firing rounds" and used to impress on the brass that they were valid weapons - in fact the operational missiles rotting on launchers mostly in Norfolk would likely have disintegrated on launch if we ever had to shoot them off in anger they were all so old. We did shoot the firing rounds into Cardigan Bay at a target drone which flew North to South at the optimum altitude of FL20 to ensure we had the best chance of hitting the things, of the two I was involved with fireing one hit the target and the other missed but crashed into the sea seconds later - an ill advised low level target attempt. Like you say in the video NOTAMs were issued, radio broadcasts were done, radar sweeps were done by RAF and RN vessels and all sorts of safety protocols were met before we fired the drone let alone the missile, I have no reason to believe that precautions in 1968 were any less thorough the technology used then had hardly changed at all by 1983/4. The point I want to make is that if it was a stray round then for a start upwards of 150 people would have known about it and you cannot keep that quiet, plus the Viscount would have been shredded. The Bloodhound was a big missile with a big warhead designed to take out huge bombers, it had proximity radar trigger (fuse) and the warhead itself was wrapped with steel rods like concrete rebar the entire thing moving at mach 2.5 so when it went bang it filled the sky with a rapidly expanding ring of steel and shreds everything in seconds. The Sunday thing, yeah that's true enough but not because the military did not play on a Sunday it was the Welsh law in those days right up into the 90s I think, nothing opened and nobody worked because it was the Lords Day and folk still held to that stuff back then. Great video I "enjoyed" it, never thought I would see this one come up so well done and good research.

[@t.p.mckenna]

That adds much need perspective and from a very valid source. Good contribution, sir.

[@martinross5521]

Thank you for your comment, which clarifies my understanding of what these missiles were designed to do. Similarly, the Buk missile which downed the Air Malaysia flight, complete and instant destruction of the aircraft. My dad worked for Ferranti at that time who made the electronics for the Bloodhound, but as a practicing Quaker he kept well clear of the weaponry aspects. He did provide a major upgrade to Shannon’s international air traffic system around 1965 which was something useful for air safety.

[@dmfitzsim]

Thanks for that perspective.

[@richardvernon317]

Firing Angle out of Aberporth for the mighty Mutt was around 330 degrees out of the launch point. You must have been involved with either the 1981 or May 82 firings as the dedicated Bloodhound Firing unit was shut down in 1982. kit from West Raynham was deployed there in 86 to do the last firings (4 RAF and 2 Swiss). Both the Swiss missiles worked perfectly, three of the four RAF missiles failed. The last RAF missile was a Rust bucket and it did break up in boost.

[@jonahlloyd3149]

@@richardvernon317 yep it was early 80s I was there May 82 sounds right because I went on a T88/89 radar course shortly after the test firings and spent the summer in Nottingham. By early 1983 I was at Benbecula working for FS Binnie who was famous for his ferocity dealing with young airmen. 40 years ago now and my failing memory is not what it was 8-) Uou were at West Raynham too - I was in Fakenham motorcycle touring a couple of years back did not recognise the place at all Raynham is a housing estate now and on the West coast Locking seems to have vanished off the face of the earth.

[@calzman]

Have you done JAL-123? Something about that flight fascinates me. The way those guys kept that plane up for soooo long was heroic. So many could have been saved if Japan wasnt more interested in playing politics. The pilot saying "This is the end" is just haunting.

[@kitkat5765]

I've loved your other videos (your voice/accent is so soothing to me, as an American!) but this was really fascinating. Despite watching a bunch of air incident videos over the years I've never heard much about this particular crash and this was very comprehensive, with some beautiful landscape shots in addition to the more technical stuff. Great work and can't wait for next week!

[@sunnyfon9065]

Your videos help me to understand the causes of plane crashes well. Another fact that I’m impressed about is that you give much description about the aircraft, airline, people, place, or others. I subscribed you. I’m excited to know the next air disasters you are going make videos on.

[@DisasterBreakdown]

Thank you!

[@classicorvintage3126]

Thank you for doing this great video and great to see this being featured. Love from Ireland.

[@kcindc5539]

Superbly done. And a fascinating unsolved catastrophe.

[@robertmcghintheorca49]

I am so thrilled by the effort that you put into this one. And whether the longest video in your KZbin career turns out to be Malaysia Airlines Berhad Flight 370 or some other epic aviation disaster story, I hope I'll be there to see it. Keep up the good work Chloe! As for Aer Lingus Flight 712, there is a quote from another KZbinr, Rob Gavagan that perfectly sums this story up. "You may not believe it, but anything is possible in a world so seriously strange."

[@jaisabai4155]

A comprehensive account of this tragic mystery, superbly narrated. Well done Chloe. 🙏

[@moiraatkinson]

I really look forward to your new videos appearing, because they are so well put together and the narration is so good. I can understand how frustrated the relatives and friends of the doomed passengers must be, with no answers and no closure - especially after working on the report for 2 years. They must have reasonably expected something more revealing to come out of it.

[@alexander7032]

As most have said before me this was fantastically done and well worth the wait. Great structure and excellent research.

[@Bornfromjets719]

Love the long format! Another great addition to your channel!

[@DisasterBreakdown]

Thanks. Once I move (which will be very soon), I will try and make more longer videos just like this one.

[@Thatonemodeller1]

My grandfather was involved in the recovery operation after the crash of 712. He was on HMS Reclaim. I am happy to see what he saw and its backstory

[@missfleming5465]

I love the hard work you put in all the videos you've done that I've seen so far. I've been a subscriber for probably a year the narration is superb, keep up the great work Chloe.😀😀😀

[@bobnash4150]

I worked on Jindivik from 1960 to 1998. They were designed and built by GAF in Melbourne (No Sydney Harbour Bridge here). Jindiviks were used at Woomera and Jervis Bay in Australia but were also sold to Sweden, the UK, and the USA.

[@jeromemccormick833]

Hi ,thanks for your interesting comment.Are you able or indeed willing to accept and hopefully give some Jindivik related questions.Cheers and thanks from Jerome McC.youngest brother of Neill McCormick a passenger on that fatal Tuskar Aircrash.

[@yukaribestwaifu]

Congratulations on your longest video ever! Thanks for your amazing content on air accidents!

[@DisasterBreakdown]

Thank you so much for watching!

[@yukaribestwaifu]

@@DisasterBreakdown the honour is mine!

[@namenamename390]

5:54 unrelated note to Fishguard: During the war of the first coalition in 1797, a small force by France landed there (mostly to be a distraction while the main force was directed towards Ireland). This marks the last time a hostile foreign force landed on the British mainland.

[@bobthebomb1596]

Rumour has it that the French force was driven off by the local women, whose red coats were mistakenly identified as soldiers uniforms.

[@gnicholson4231]

Thank you fr that analysis. I was particularly interested because I knew the F/O Paul Hefferman because we trained together at AST Perth in 1965-6 In the video you also alluded to an Aer Lingus Viscount training accident. The two trainees were also co-students at AST. I could also give you more information on why they were doing their instrument training on a Viscount and not on a Cessna 310 at AST.

[@collin6238]

Hello yes I would be interested to know why that was

[@francovance1]

A friend of mine who also trained at Perth told me Paul was his best friend, now no longer with us, Ed Hill was his name.

[@gnicholson4231]

@@francovance1 Frank, I cannot remember an Ed Hill. The Aer Lingus course of which Paul was a member were a few months ahead of our course and we did not mix very much with them although we ate with them etc. Maybe Ed was a member of that course, but I have forgotten, or was on an even earlier course and left before we arrived. Geoff

[@francovance1]

@@gnicholson4231 Thank you Geoff, Ed was twenty odd years my senior, both from the same village in Co Waterford, he often entertained me with tales from his time in Perth with names like Ernie Holmes and Fats Hamilton and others which I've sadly forgotten. Keep well. Frank.

[@eugeneomalley8407]

In late 1968 or early 1969 as a new employee of the Marconi company in Chelmsford, UK, I briefly conversed with a colleague who had just come back from a visit to an RAF base in Wales. He made mention of a drone which had been lost control of in a maintenance exercise on the Sunday in question in March of 1968. This "drone" might very well be the "Jindivik" you describe. At that time there was no suggestion that this "incident" was in any way connected with Aer Lingus 712. The drone just got lost - end of story. It was only much later that the possibility that the two events might have been connected. Such connection was never made publicly. If there is a connection then I suspect that the matter is buried under official secrecy.

[@concettaworkman5895]

Uh-oh.

[@Shamrock100]

A few comments: The Viscount that crashed was built in 1957 so not particularly old, though, as stated in the video, plans were already afoot for Aer Lingus to transition to an all-jet fleet, with the first 737s due in 1969. Some other major carriers were still using Viscounts at this time, including Lufthansa, Air Canada, CAAC (China), BEA and several other UK carriers and the last of the type soldiered on until the mid-1990s, though with a lot of engineering support to enable this. The last Viscount deliveries were to China in 1964. Aer Lingus did suffer one further hull loss, of a Short 360, at East Midlands Airport in 1986, but this was non-fatal. I think that some of the various scenarios that were considered by investigators in light of observer recollections are a bit fanciful; recovering a damaged aircraft of the Viscount's size and design from a rapid, spinning descent would surely have been near-impossible. However I have never seen that question adequately addressed.

[@PJay-wy5fx]

The gap in technological progress between 1958 and 1968 is many times larger than a more recent ten year period. The fact that these planes were still being built and used does not mean they were the pinnacle of modern technology at that time.

[@Shamrock100]

@@PJay-wy5fx I agree that they weren't - but they were still in fairly widespread use on less prestigious routes. Aer Lingus had considered some of the medium-range jets in the early 1960s (and bought four BAC- 111s for continental routes) but it was not till the 737-200 was marketed that the airline moved to order this type to replace the Viscount.

[@me_and_my_piper739]

This channel just keeps getting better and better. Love it. 👍🏻

[@harrisoncarey4031]

Another great video as usual. As a cork man it was even more interesting to me. Keep up the great work!

[@erictaylor5462]

It should also be noted that the tailplane is not a wing. It doesn't hole the tail up, it pushes the tail down. So the loss if the tail plane will not result un a pitch up, it will result in a rather volent pitch down. There is a film of a Mosquito testing the skip bomb, preparing for the dam busters raid. The bomb hits the water and water splashing up hits the tail of the plane. The wings bend down violently almost breaking before the plane hits the water.

[@paulyoung7551]

Great video as always. And the editing... I got chills when the video got to the part about the Jindavik.

[@timdodd3897]

My mom met dad while working for Capital Airlines while they used Viscounts. I never knew they lost so many. Thanks for another informative video.

[@ThreenaddiesRexMegistus]

Great video and I like the meticulous avoidance of unqualified speculation. Another crash of the Viscount was the MacRobertson Miller Airlines flight 1750 Viscount on approach to Port Hedland, Western Australia in December 1968, involving 26 fatalities. I believe a wing failed catastrophically and this was subsequently determined to have been caused by the common practice of using a forklift to dismount engines for service, as in your video on American Airlines Flight 191. Might be a worthwhile subject if you haven’t already looked? Subscribed! 👍🏻

[@VisibilityFoggy]

Ahh, right near where my family lives in Ireland! It is still very much on the minds of people there to this day. Bad events that are forgotten-about or left behind in other countries are held very dear in Ireland, sometimes.

[@XcRunner1031]

Best video yet. Comprehensive coverage, emotionally impactful, editing on point. Can't wait to see the next one.

[@s47t8thi88]

you *NEED* to make more of these… unsolved air crashes mini documentary series? hell yeah!

[@kennethjohnson4280]

I am leaning toward metal fatigue and loss of the stabilizer. Metal fatigue was not well understood in the 60's. As to answers lying on the sea floor, there won't be any today. After almost 60 years, time and the sea will have erased any answers anyone may seek.

[@Pullisto]

To say the Viscount was old in 1968 is a bit strange. Only 20 since the first, and for the 800 series involved in the crash, around 10 at that time which is not particularly old for an airframe. It's the maintaining of it rather than age anyway. The crash of the CV580 mentioned and referring to it as old at the time takes me to mention that a fleet of these were operated in New Zealand by Air Chathams until being retired last year, the aircraft being almost 70 years old. They were still giving reliable service, however, getting parts was becoming a problem.

[@siobhancrowley5195]

Ah ha you will no doubt be very familiar with the mighty Bristol Freighter!!

[@azuill1126]

Fun fact about Irish aviation: Ryanair has had only one incident, involving a collision with a bird. They have the best track record in Europe, while also making a frankly ridiculous 2800+ flights per day as of 2022. This is all on top of being a notoriously VERY budget airline. Its a bit of an anomaly when it comes to commercial aviation.

[@ShanesQueenSite]

Thanks for this - I am from Ireland and I always heard about the missile or UAV theory but I'm glad to hear different evidence. Great video

[@robinj.9329]

I'm writing this in June of 2024. I began my own Pilot Training way back in the 1960's. Back then, I had many opportunities to sit and listen as the "Old Timers" (pilots age 60 and over) related their own experiences of learning to fly AND working as Commercial Pilots from 1920 onwards. From the initial invention of the "Aeroplane" onwards, it was considered a VERY DANGEROUS occupation! Once the Parachute became commonly available EVERYONE wore one EVERY TIME they flew! This practice didn't stop until sometime in the late 1940's. And for certain forms of flight training, both student and Instructor are required to ware them to this day. All the millions of people so eager to put out their hard earned cash, just to fly to Grand Ma's house would be much less eager IF they actually knew just how dangerous flying really was! In an Airliner, flying at high altitudes, above 35,000 feet? Even a simple loss of cabin pressure can result in a fatal crash!

[@willr6887]

I love the long videos! The thorough commentary is nice, great work! :)

[@EIGYRO]

When maintenance records can't be found, ships logs don't add up, and expert salvors first fail to locate wreckage, and then drop it back in the sea after it was located for them, there is a lot that stinks, and it isn't fish.

[@lisaa8795]

Yes exactly, RIP to the passengers and valiant crew.

[@alrise1776]

I only found your channel a few days ago, but its quickly becoming one of my favorites. Keep up the great work!

[@danielabackstrom]

Wow this is such good content!! Good job Chloe 🥰

[@Nikki_Holland]

Another excellent video Chloe. I’d never heard of this accident before

[@Belltogo3000]

Who is Chloe

[@Ztbmrc1]

The good old Vickers Viscount. In the early '80s Virgin opened a feeder line from Maastricht Airport, EHBK here in the south east of the Netherlands, to London Gatwick. From there the passengers could change on the Virgin B747 to continue their journey to Newark. First Virgin used the Bac1-11, but than changed over to the Viscount, in several liveries, including BAF, like the one shown shortly in this video. I think even that it was exactly this plane, I mean to remember the registration. I may even have a slide of it here. I was an aircraft spotter and made a lot of slides of planes on all my trips to many airports. So although you say they were already near the end of their lifetime in 1968, some still continued to fly for almost 20 more years.

[@djvycious]

Not only are these the best airline disaster videos out there (that includes comparing to Mayday), but your narration is like unintentional ASMR. Please keep doing what you're doing!

[@sammydingdong4540]

Good informative video thanks.........I always use Aer Lingus when I fly to the USA The service and catering on board is very good.

[@TechnoBlogGuru]

Check out my latest video "Boeing 747 Breaks Up Just After Takeoff | Falling Apart Over Hawaii (4K)" Watch Now: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rIGagWywo5WDiLs

[@bicivelo]

What an amazing video. The amount of details and research is staggering… not to mention the clear and concise presentation. It’s another level. Wow. 😮

[@offsidev6059]

Lead investigator being the one who certified the plane's airworthiness is all you need to know to be certain that no actual investigation was done. The only thing he was leading was the sweeping under the rug.

[@darraghmckenna9127]

Great video and thank you for covering this accident.

[@Dr.med-rasen]

Missed your videos for a couple of months. You improved so much in this time!

[@markholbrook3949]

No other content creator meets or exceeds your investigative skills! The effort you put forth is both noticed and appreciated!!

[@joannegaughan6132]

Very well done and excellent topic and content. Enjoyed the new format as well. You outdid yourself covering all the possibilities of the cause of this airplane crash. Thank you for an excellent video.👏👍❤🇺🇸

[@michaelb1716]

Another fantastic production, thanks very much!

[@momentomori-rw6jp]

Absolutely love this channel, Just leaving a comment for support ❤❤

[@DisasterBreakdown]

Thank you so much!

[@harrietharlow9929]

Just subbed. This was a very interesting case. I watched another before this and found it quite interesting as well.

[@plunder1956]

From 1960-67 my father flew regularly from Dublin to London Heathrow almost every week. Mostly on the Viscount (we often referred tit as "the Old Bus"). I'm glad I never had to fly that often myself. I was born in 1956 & flew in several piston engine propeller aircraft from the age of six months, including the DC3. I also flew in the Viscount on occasions from Dublin.

[@zacktong8105]

I had never heard of this accident though I was then in service at Lajes Field, Azores, Portugal and received only partial news information. Obviously there is reason to suspect a horizontal stablizer and elevator separation as a probably cause of this accident. But unless there was another similar accident of this piece there is only speculation as to whether it played a role in this accident. Since no military activities were taking place that weekend that sort of obsolves that as a possibility. Dispite long standing differences with the UK the Brits would have had a professional attitude toward this accident as it was a British aircraft involved. The science of undersea search efforts which has played a critical role in solving accidents might well have been far more limited at the time and depth of wreckage could have been a strong inhibitor. Very well done!

[@j.o.1516]

But there WERE other similar accidents involving Viscounts. So it is not just "speculation". This was all revealed in the 2002 investigation. The report is online.

[@pissant145]

Stellar video! I love these longer videos! SOOOO looking forward to the 1hr video!

[@billlawrence1899]

I flew Viscounts with United Airlines from Spring 1968 until the last one was retired early 1969. The Viscount was a good airplane, but it had a lot of bad luck. A number of them were lost, all for different reasons, and nothing having to do with the design of the airplane. One ( when it was Capital Airlines ) was lost when a Whistling Swan impacted the horizontal stabilizer. So this was not the first time a Viscount was destroyed and everyone lost because of something hitting that particular part of the structure.

[@robinboucherwonderfulflight]

Hi, Was the Viscount a popular aircraft with United? I was under the impression it had a good record. It seemed to be used by alot of carriers. Thank you

[@billlawrence1899]

@@robinboucherwonderfulflight I think it was popular with passengers, as it was smooth and quiet. ( Insde Those Rolls Royce Dart engines made an ear piercing shriek outside. Sometimes called he 40,000 pound dog whistle. ) Also, it had large oval shaped windows. United took over Capital in 1961, and retired the Viscount in early 1969. I don't know how well the bean counters liked it as it only carried 44 passengers.

[@28ebdh3udnav]

Your channel is growing. I can't believe you have over 100k subs now

[@georgittesingbiel219]

Good 👍 work Disaster Breakdown!

[@kvarner6886]

This is absolutely *fascinating.* Excellent video! Although I don't personally believe the Viscount was shot down, the Jindavik (sp?) collision theory is certainly interesting, although highly unlikely. I have to figure that this is a crash caused by poor maintenance on a too-old plane. Tragic that the families never got the answers they deserve, or the closure.

[@jeromemccormick833]

Thanks for comment. No matter what we "believe" lets back up this belief with solid factual evidence.

[@kvarner6886]

@@jeromemccormick833 Huh? I'm not allowed to have a personal belief based on the facts presented? I'm confused.

[@RMR1]

"Even in 1968, the Viscount was old." The accident airplane was built in 1956. A 12-year-old airliner is not old by any means. It's actually on the young side for a passenger airplane. Even the very first VIscounts built in 1948 were only 20 years old at the time -- a little beyond the mid-point of most commercial airliners' life span but still not considered old. Great video, BTW.

[@GudaGudaPaisen]

The more mysterious it is, the darker its truth will be. Wishing peace upon family members and friends.

[@KoffinKat]

This was a really good video, thanks Chloe! Love how you included all the theories, I definitely learned something new today. Cheers!

[@captaincodpiece3263]

This is the best documentary or article on this accident ive seen or read, a very well and comprehensive researched and well presented. I had heard of this before including the the theory of accidental shoot down and cover up. In 1975 on holiday in Wales i passed the Llanbedr base which had a Jindivik displayed at the perimeter. The example was red and white rather than air recognition orange as in the pictures in the video. It would appear from the information presented the theory and conspiracy is unlikely and the failure of the Royal Navy to find the wreckage could be down to simple poor performance or bad luck, maybe inexperience, the RN having a good record locating aircraft wreckage in the North Sea, where such activity was unfortunately more common. All in all a thoroughly excellent documentary

[@mnztr1]

Excellent job with the video and narration.

[@DD-wd7ku]

I agree, well presented with a lot of information. Just one detail to be aware of, Welsh place name pronunciation. Aberporth, the 'a' is always as in 'cat' and 'Ll' (double L) has its own sound, not the same as a single L (tip of tongue against roof of mouth just behind teeth and hiss). Good luck! 😉

[@darkfox2076]

Great video again always very well presented

[@erbrferg]

Fantastic video. Very thorough and clear. I can tell you put a lot of work into this

[@MrAvant123]

I was at Aberporth in the late 70's and have heard these theories in the past. I am very familiar with Jindys and the Range in General obviously but it was rare for the Range to be active on weekends for firings, although we did do a lot of maintenance on weekends. I cant speak for naval ships int he range area, but even if they were there they wouldnt have done any firings (eg Sea Slug or Sea Dart) without an active Range. What wasn't mentioned was the Army base on Anglesy to the NE of the crash zone. Here I believe in this period, they were test firing the Thunderbird missile which was the army equivalent of the RAF Bristol Bloodhound missile, which had a similar long range capability. I have no idea of the operations of this base as it was closed way before my time and the Thunderbird was retired way before the Bloodhound. I didnt know they found a Jindy under the sea, and this surprises me as we never generally shot them down (as they were expensive) instead we used a target offset.

[@richardvernon317]

The Range was at Ty-Croes (now a race track) on the south coast of Anglesey. Thunderbird 2 only had a max range of around 35 NM. Bloodhound 2 could do double that (Longest range successful intercept in its acceptance trials at Woomera was 69NM, though a couple of missiles almost flew 90NM but missed due to Radar or Missile faults). None of the Bloodhound 2 firings out of Aberporth flew anything more that 40NM, the only one that did was a 65 Squadron missile that suffered a WREBUS failure in 1966 and splashed not far from Bardsey Island.

[@jeromemccormick833]

Hi thanks for comment. Even if a Seadart was responsible for the Tuskar Aircrash on Sunday 24Th. of March 1968, who could be responsible? How many would know full details?At 17,000 feet high who would be able to observe impact of the missile with a Viscount?.If testing a Seadart Missile would the manufacture , firing, monitoring,and theresulting test report be Top Secret.Would everyone know the full details and talk about it freely after?Cheers.

[@j.o.1516]

The crash had nothing to do with the military. The Viscount crashed almost certainly due to structural failure after a 20 minute struggle by the crew to regain control. Loss of control was caused by a failure of the elevator spring tab about ten minutes into the flight. This is backed by over 45 eye witness reports and the results of similar accidents involving Viscounts. It's all in the report of the 2002 investigation which is online and can be downloaded for free.

[@bobthebomb1596]

@@jeromemccormick833 If it was a sea Dart it would have had to come from Aberporth and it only had a range of 40nmi. The first ship fitted with Sea Dart (HMS Bristol) was not launched until 1969.

[@latasthedog.4401]

I don't know, I've always been curious what you're talking about, the aviateca 901 plane crash that occurred in El Salvador since this changed the history of the Central American region by improving its air safety.

[@robgrey6183]

As an American I find it unbelievable that military exercises would be conducted in such a crowded area as the Irish Sea. American air and missile exercises take place in remote desert areas far, far from civilian settlement or activities. Pretty crowded continent ya got there, I guess.

[@bobthebomb1596]

There are not many remote desert areas in the UK, so most live aircraft firings take place on beaches or out at sea. [Edit] This comment was not intended to be as sarcastic as it sounds on re-reading.

[@chicken29843]

Not every country has the luxury of that tbh.

[@Mary-wo5ln]

​@@bobthebomb1596 But why are the British firing towards Ireland?

[@bobthebomb1596]

@@Mary-wo5ln Because Ireland is on the other side of the Irish sea, where the range is located. www.milfordmarina.com/media/1143/cardigan_bay_danger_area.jpg?width=425.1798561151079&height=500

[@davidgapp1457]

I looked at this accident, in detail, several years ago. It seems probable the aircraft suffered an elevator failure as this could've induced the sudden, violent spin. The Viscount would've been further damaged by the spin itself (consistent with the rapid lost of altitude). It is quite possibly the right-hand elevator control surface became partially detached during the spin or simply become inoperative. The assumption here is that the pilots regained control but were unable to correct the nose down pitch owing to lack of elevator control authority. To explain this, it helps to know that most aircraft counterbalance the lift of the main wings with downward force coming from the tail surfaces - typically this makes for a more stable aircraft. But if the elevators both fail the aircraft will likely enter a severe nose dive. If one elevator fails or the trim tab fails, the aircraft may enter a spin condition. Spin correction usually starts with rudder control (opposite lock) and a nose down pitch. The aileron on the stalled wing is likely useless until the stall condition is alleviated and pulling back on the stick would certainly worsen the stall condition. It sounds as if the pilots did recover the aircraft from the spin but were unable to correct the nose down pitch. Loss of the trim-tab can have a surprisingly dramatic effect during certain parts of a typical flight, but a sudden entry into a spin, as a result, is improbable while at cruise. As for impact with another aircraft (UAV) or missile: while these possibilities have a non-zero probability, the chances of such a collision seem remote compared to the likelihood of mechanical failure. It would be a remarkable strike indeed that 'only' damaged the elevator so this seems a stretch to me. In general the British do not lob active missiles around or fly UAVs at altitudes used by commercial airliners. In addition, before such tests, spotter aircraft are invariably on-site both as observers and to ensure no aerial incursions during such tests. Finally, it would be common practice for the armed forces to issue a civilian notification (NOTAM) for such a test (as you noted in the video) and to establish an exclusion zone. There was no such exclusion zone in effect that day and, in addition, no civilian record of same. A cover-up would be almost impossible and the repercussions of such a cover-up, should it be detected, would be catastrophic. Aircraft back in the 40's, 50's and 60's were inevitably not as safe as modern types which have the benefit of decades of hard-won experience, greater reliability, rising standards and more advanced redundancy designs. Even so, the Viscount was a generally very safe aircraft and not prone to in-flight failures of critical control surfaces. Either way, a terrible loss of life and I really wish more had been done to uncover the root-cause. Thanks for this well-considered video!

[@jeromemccormick833]

Hi David, thanks for your overview and especially for your interesting thoughts on let's say the Tail Area.I'm only interested in publically available documentation at the moment with which I use to form my comments.At this stage I know an awful lot all about The Tuskar Aircrash and everybody involved.Can I send you some more detail later ,thats if you agree to allow me to do so.Cheers and thanks, from Jerome.

[@j.o.1516]

Very reasonable and intelligen post. Thank you. You might also find the report from the 2nd (independent) investigation around 2002 which is available online. A lot of what you wrote would concur with their findings.

[@gerardleahy6946]

I found the video very interesting. I was a very young boy when the crash occurred but have memories of it. I recall being asked by the teacher the following day to pray for all of the victims. I have long had an interest in the matter and have read much and watched many documentaries about it. There was a programme on TV recently and it is often covered when various anniversaries arise. Aer Lingus has not lost a passenger since this accident but did lose an aircraft in the late 80s/early 90s when a commuter plane crash landed in East Midlands UK. I think it was a SAAB. The accident was caused by a design flaw. The only other fatal accident involving Aer Lingus passengers was the loss of a DC3 in Wales in 1952. The cause was never fully established either. Regarding the Viscount accident, I will state a number of interesting facts. The ex KLM Viscounts were purchased as a stop gap measure while newer jets (Boeing 737s) were awaited. I recall reading a long number of years ago how the Roman Catholic chaplain at Aberphort had made enquiries about drones and missiles being launched on the fateful day. He assured even non Catholics that he would protect the identities of current or ex servicemen as if they had gone to Confession. (for non Catholics I will explain that things told to a priest i Confession are absolutely secret) Nobody came forward to say that there was any activity on that day and any information he received indicated that no drones or missiles were launched on 24th March 1968. Personally, I have long since believed that the British had no involvement. In 2000 the Irish Government commissioned international experts to re examine the available evidence. Sadly, many who participated in the 1968 enquiry had died and much documentation was not available. However, the testimony of eye witnesses in the Wexford area was taken more seriously. The investigation concluded that collision with a missile or other aircraft was very unlikely and that the likely cause was the tailplane breaking away due to metal fatigue and/or collision with a large migratory bird, of a type known to frequent the area. May all the victims rest in peace.

[@jeromemccormick833]

Thanks for your comments.Isn't it unusual for a Catholic priest to get involved ?Who was he trying to convince with his confession statement.If there was a seadart SAM tested that day who could have fired it? Would an airborn pilotless target be involved ? If missile testing was done would everyone know exactly about impact and outcome and would it be common knowledge and discussed by everyone.?Whatever caused the Tuskar Aircrash let the evidential proof come out and then lets have a Public Sworn Enquiry on why 61 people died on Sunday 24Th. March 1968.Do'es anyone think that a large migratory bird took off from Wexford that Sunday,then flew up to the same level as the Viscount at 17,000 Ft. and then somehow killed 61 people.I was a passenger on that very plane {the St. Phelim ] when three weeks before the Tuskar Aircrash of the St. Phelim .Cheers.

[@donalfinn4205]

Very well done. Subbed.👍☘️

[@sentientdogma1206]

Right on brother, keep up the great vids my man.

[@Kevin_Forde]

Excellent video. I grew up in County Wexford, so I have heard so much about it over the years. My mum told me that she remembers it happening very well.

[@Ardoyne-jx4tv]

I'm from Ireland I remember this...

[@Darkkan13]

I wonder if too many people were worried the finger would be pointed at them so they hid their records adding to the mystery...