This is the most realistic and closest to flysing cars
@nhhfdyhvdfghh5 ай бұрын
Если бы ещё использовать эти роторы в режиме "колёс" на парковке для руления в ангар... но это усложнит и утяжелит конструкцию.
@-108-Ай бұрын
That last feature highlighted at the very end (1:28) could be invaluable to search and rescue missions; Revolutionary, really.
@haugheymatt43814 ай бұрын
Why is the blue tarp there on every test flight video?
@-108-Ай бұрын
So that if it crashes down onto the floor, beneath itself, the clean-up will be a breeze.
@licencetoswill6 ай бұрын
I cant see how it would be more efficient than regular props with all that AoA change through the cycle, but it would be great to see comparitive testing.
@zudukaiKilo446 ай бұрын
uniform blade speed and no retreating blade stall probably the biggest factors in high speed efficiency, but that's my speculation. additionally the blade loading might be more even since the profile is at a constant shape and speed too. another thing to note is that you don't need to wait for RPM to increase thrust with the cyclorotor design. eventually we all will see the data and be able to make an informed comparison.
@thefirstsin3 ай бұрын
it has strong stable thrust if the propellers were in rigid mode, but power source is a big problem for them.
@mikemahana65423 ай бұрын
Could a bicycle be made using this tech?
@thefirstsin3 ай бұрын
the only problem is the power source, which is critical for this type of development.
@MrTolerant26 күн бұрын
I am very skeptical tbh
@cyclogyro3 ай бұрын
It is nice that your company is working hard with the cyclogyro. You have a great team of performers! It is just a pity that you do not have fundamentally new technical solutions. Of course, you draw very well, but such a product will fly poorly. Your predecessors in the D-DALUS project lifted 250 kg into the air. (What is the weight of your cyclogyro?) Your technology is practically no different from that invented by engineer Sverchkov in 1909, but for some reason you stubbornly refer to other authors from the 1930s, who did nothing technically for the development of the cyclogyro and the hydrodynamics of your cyclorotor. Why such a denial of engineer Sverchkov's achievement, after all, it was he who first came up with the kinematics of your cyclorotor?
@-108-Ай бұрын
Why you gotsta be hatin' on they game, yo?
@cyclogyroАй бұрын
For @-108- 1. I really like this team, especially its leader, although lately the team has been marking time. 2. Ask a question on the merits of my comment without false emotions. It is clear from your comment that you know nothing about cyclogyro. 3. The purpose of my comments is to help those who work, since all my comments are on the merits of this issue.
@cyclogyroАй бұрын
@@-108-see answer below or up
@-108-Ай бұрын
@@cyclogyro Iz just wantin' to trow some ebonics bs in der fo da fuk uv it.