Design Arguments, Design Detection, and Natural Theology

[@Chuqmoney]

"All human knowledge is grounded in faith" - what a great way to end this discussion!

[@drchristopherjsernaque]

Discovery Institute is awesome!!!

[@curiousguy978]

One of the most impressive parts is he was able to work in a space balls quote. Outstanding! Seriously, thanks and appreciate all you are doing to spread knowledge

[@marbanak]

William Dembski is 'da man!

[@bowmanhealth1824]

All human knowledge is grounded in Faith! #rationallivingmatters

[@CJ-ik8qf]

Faith doesn’t know equations.

[@kensmith8152]

The mere fact that humans have been reverse engineering nature for centuries aught to tell you something about design right there!

[@mohitoautomaciek801]

🤝👍wielkie👍PiĘĆ👍DZiĘKUjĘ👍🤝

[@SimplifiedTruth]

When did this event take place exactly? Thanks

[@refuse2bdcvd324]

God is a logical necessity.

[@DavidWalterCarlson44]

Our personal experiences are random. Our observations are random. However, the fine-tuning of the Universe is not.

[@charleshadden2937]

1 hour in... You first have to prove that this Antonius life somehow became intelligent. That adds a level of complexity far beyond natural possibilities.

[@GFJM-y9m]

Does Dawkins know of any blind person who can make watches? If he doesn't, then his theory is not only wrong, but it shows his lack of intelligence proving he is not intelligently designed. Enough said. Catch 22!

[@CJ-ik8qf]

You missed the point. The point is the watchmaker is nature. And watches aren’t the goal.

[@tonymaurice4157]

Abiogenesis can't even be shown in the lab with all kinds of designed equipment

[@CJ-ik8qf]

Evolution is still true 🥱

[@killerbee6484]

Limited adaptions

[@fightswithspirits915]

Doesn’t this make the question, “then who created God?” even more impossible? Where did it all start?

[@KlintonSilvey]

Not really. That would be more of a problem if God was *made of* the same kind of physical stuff as the universe. The whole point is there has to be something that is not like the physical stuff of the universe.

[@agpilot2378]

INTELLIGENT design? What's the intelligence of designing waste into a system such that there also has to be a waste removal system included? A properly engineered system should have NO waste. We could do without toilets. Is an "all powerful" being with "limitless intelligence" incapable of this? Why do we spend almost $5 trillion/year dealing with "design flaws" (disease)? What is the design purpose of goose bumps, coccyx, appendix, or nipples on men?

[@slsmith181]

The assumption of a designer is NOT science, but is pseudo science. Assuming an idea without peer reviewed evidence is a fraud. Please provide scientific peer reviewed evidence of ANY god or creator. You'll be the first in history to do so!!!

[@shalom64112]

You didn't even watch the video, did you? I think we've had enough of dismissal and straw-man arguments. Please be good enough to digest the video you're commenting on here. Thank you.

[@KlintonSilvey]

No chance he watched it.

[@bobbrenna9507]

I don’t need pseudo-science to prove you’re a nitwit.