3:43 I made an error: It's 22.4L/Mol, not 22.4Mol/L. Sorry for the confusion.
@testingmaterials324210 ай бұрын
That also means the math should be a division instead of a multiplication right? otherwise the units don't check out. I think that factor of about 500 on the final result does affect the conclusion of the calculation. Still a really great video, and let's be honest most people come here for watching the experimental work. Thanks so much for making this really intersting series!
@bretcannon382610 ай бұрын
22.4 L/mol is the value for a temperature at 0°C, while the value at 25°C is 22.4 x (273K+25K)/(273K) = 24.5 L/mol. For a temperature in the tube furnace of 1000°C, the molar volume of an ideal gas is 22.4 x (273K + 1000K)/273K = 104.5 L/Mol.
@leocurious991910 ай бұрын
Just to add what the others said, instead of using a rather derived value for one temperature and pressure, just use the ideal gas equation directly. Ideal gas is fairly accurate for these conditions,
@الدعوةالىالله-خ8م10 ай бұрын
@@testingmaterials3242 ⚠ God has said in the Quran: 🔵 { O mankind, worship your Lord, who created you and those before you, that you may become righteous - ( 2:21 ) 🔴 [He] who made for you the earth a bed [spread out] and the sky a ceiling and sent down from the sky, rain and brought forth thereby fruits as provision for you. So do not attribute to Allah equals while you know [that there is nothing similar to Him]. ( 2:22 ) 🔵 And if you are in doubt about what We have sent down upon Our Servant [Muhammad], then produce a surah the like thereof and call upon your witnesses other than Allah, if you should be truthful. ( 2:23 ) 🔴 But if you do not - and you will never be able to - then fear the Fire, whose fuel is men and stones, prepared for the disbelievers.( 2:24 ) 🔵 And give good tidings to those who believe and do righteous deeds that they will have gardens [in Paradise] beneath which rivers flow. Whenever they are provided with a provision of fruit therefrom, they will say, "This is what we were provided with before." And it is given to them in likeness. And they will have therein purified spouses, and they will abide therein eternally. ( 2:25 ) ⚠ Quran
@АлияАбилдаева-о1о6 ай бұрын
@@leocurious9919 hi. when you multiply it by 1/10000 do you take into account that you have to convert it to pa? or should you? I was trying to make similar calculations but my vacuum pulls 3.9996 Pa
@DD-DD-DD10 ай бұрын
Adding a vacuum reservoir tank and valve inline with the pump would allow you to "precharge" the vacuum system while firing the furnace, and save you those 2-3 minutes of time it takes to draw everything down, perhaps thinning the oxide layer a bit more.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
this might work, though it's likely easier to use a nitrogen or argon purge to get the O2 out quicker
@DD-DD-DD10 ай бұрын
Sure, but you said you didn't want the expense of having to source welding gas. Reusing an old tank is pretty cheap and effective and never needs refilling.
@senorjp2110 ай бұрын
I think you might be getting a stress riser where the end of the tube meets your metal plug. The atmosperic pressure ends up bearing on a very small area. You could put an o ring there as padding. And make sure there is tolerance for the metal to expand. This is a 1 bar pressure seal so you could leave the o rings a bit proud and it will still seal. If the metal plug heats up enough to put two opposing point loads on the inside of that glass hoop - you're hooped!
@TheKubux10 ай бұрын
In the final design, the glass is contacted only by the o-rings, which squeeze around the tube and prevent the metal flange from pushing against the glass.
@sulij410 ай бұрын
I was actually looking at the final photo and a little worried about having all that mass out on the two ends. Are you at all worried about the tube snapping at the point it meets the furnace?
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
The tube seems pretty strong and i don't currently expect it to snap from the weight. plus this is how they do it in industry so it's *probably* fine until i make a new video and break the tube again
@r2501250110 ай бұрын
Can one of the big chip manufacture please please get this lad sponsored and offer him tours through a production facility it would be great to see how much a guy like this gets out of such a hands on tour.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
you have NO IDEA how many un-google-able questions i need answered by someone in the industry
@zyeborm10 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflighta number of universities have small scale chip fab labs, try emailing them perhaps? The small scale might be closer to your process and teachers often love to teach someone who has shown as much interest as you have.
@TheKubux10 ай бұрын
Small note, although probably insignificant: EDIT: this might be a larger problem because depending on the wires used, you end up measuring the furnace temperature in reference to the flange. See sub-comments. Usage of thermocouple extension wire is recommended in this case as the termination point temperature is for sure above the board reference temperature. On the other hand if you are fine with having 50K uncertainty (I'm assuming the flange is 50C above ambient), it should be fine. In presence of temperature gradients (which in case of a furnace end cap will for sure be the case) you should not solder thermocouple leads as it creates a unpredictable set of thermocouples at the soldering point. Depending on how precise you want to go, the optimal solution is to use a specially designed thermocouple wire (for given thermocouple type) and spot welding it to the thermocouple tail, a mechanical connection can also work. At the board, the connection point is less critical if you can guarantee that there are no thermal gradients, but type-compensated connectors are also available.
@berni8k10 ай бұрын
I was about the say the same. Because you soldered wires at the flange, you will be subtracting the temperature of the flange from the measured temperature, so the more the flange heats up the more error you will have. For this reason they make so called "Thermocpuple extension wire" it is made out of the same material as the thermocpuple, so that it has no thermal EMF, this brings your cold junction all the way to the thermocouple connector (Where you can measure the connectors temperature to compensate for it)
@TheKubux10 ай бұрын
Thinking about it more, you are right. If we simplify the model down to only copper from the flange, then the termocuople measures temperature of (Furance - Flange) but the calculation right now probably assumes (Furnace - Ambient/uC board).
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
The temperature of the solder joint is roughly ambient temperature, even with the furnace cranked to it's max temp. I can double check again the exact temp, but i'm pretty sure it's cold enough not to be a huge problem.
@cainaM2N10 ай бұрын
Yes, you built another pair of thermocouple junctions! Yea, it will add a temperature error to that (roughly the temperature difference between the ends of the copper involved). Thermocouple extension wire recommended to avoid this
@MarkFunderburk10 ай бұрын
I came to the comments to say this too
@subasurf10 ай бұрын
This kind of project (making your own silicon chips) absolutely isn't in my wheelhouse, but I'm so down for all this problem solving you do on the channel. These videos are such a good demonstrations on how to tackle complex problems and how to be resilient in the face of constantly "failing" towards success.
@floor_board123810 ай бұрын
Man, this project is sick! I can't believe it doesn't get more views, especially with how well laid-out and well-explained it all is. Keep up the good work!
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
slowly working my way through the youtube algo lol
@Gin-toki10 ай бұрын
I would really enjoy a full video about machining the end cap fittings :) And as always, really well made video. Keep up the great work!
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
i might get around to making a more detailed video about it
@abdomohamed-qt1he10 ай бұрын
You're doing much hard, accurate and smart work...
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
doing my best! i occasionally make errors and i appreciate people for being patient with me as well :)
@XMaster96DE10 ай бұрын
Can't wait for the next one, really happy I found your channel :)
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
hopefully i'll get the next one cranked out in less than a month!
@seeigecannon10 ай бұрын
Suggestion if you ever rebuild the thermocouple assy: instead of using an epoxy paste like the JB weld, use an epoxy liquid. There won't be as many entrained bubbles (you can improve on this a lot more if you use your vacuum pump to pull the micro bubbles out too), but you will have a much smoother surface finish. This is important because oxygen will be diffusing from the surface of the epoxy in a good vacuum. The liquid epoxy also reduces the risk of a leak along the solid wires. If you end up using stranded wire for something the liquid can flow between the strands and still give a pretty good seal (though you might want to spread the strands a bit). Keep up the good work. BTW: I have gotten that HPLC going and I still plan on running that PCB resist you sent me on it to see what happens, but I will want to get a bad column to run it on first so I don't risk a good one.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
yeah, that might be a better method. i like JB weld because it *seems* very compatible with vacuum, but it is true that it's a lot more viscous than i'd like
@Spirit53210 ай бұрын
JB Weld works WAY better with vacuum than most off-the-shelf epoxies, especially the low viscosity ones. It's the right choice here, and it tends to cure very clean, without bubbles. Hysol EA 1C is better than JB Weld, but a bit more expensive(2x).
@abdullahanton10 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflight You can try acetone to thin it out.
@cambridgemart20758 ай бұрын
@@abdullahanton Isopropyl alcohol works well, but any solvent will cause outgassing from the seal.
@whompronnie10 ай бұрын
A lot of excellent problem-solving again. I loved your vacuum development process. I was sad that you got caught out by the scam-like nature of modern glass, specifically that of faux borosilicate. Pyrex especially (which I don't know if you were using but is relevant) built a business of trust in the 20th century that their glassware was made of the high-quality material, but around the turn of the millennium, started allowing more use of their name on regular, low-quality glass. Even today, people are surprised when their Pyrex dishes shatter under normal, medium-temperature conditions because they'd owned other Pyrex dishes from 25+ years ago that had survived for so long. It's no doubt that most lab equipment companies now are more than happy to allow consumers to assume they're made of materials that had become standard but are instead no more robust than a $3 glass coffee carafe. But enough of my ranting. I love watching your processes.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
yeah, that was unfortunate. I guess i need to be more careful with my suppliers in the future. glad you liked the video!
@GRBtutorials10 ай бұрын
Not sure if it’s related, but the Pyrex brand includes regular soda lime glass in addition to borosilicate. That might be part of the confusion.
@whompronnie10 ай бұрын
@@GRBtutorialsYes, soda-lime, that's it. I couldn't remember the name
@hantrio432710 ай бұрын
It could have been borosilicate glass. Borosilicate glass should only used up to temperatures of 490°C. At 817°C it already softens and 1000°C is just overkill. Only quarz glass can survive these temperatures
@RonParker10 ай бұрын
@@hantrio4327 This is what I was going to say. The annealing temperature for clear boro is around 1050 F, or about 560 C. Anything above that is soft enough to deform, given enough time, and the vacuum inside will just make it deform more quickly than it would under just gravitational force. The softening point is listed online as about 820-825 C, but that's just the point where it reaches a specific arbitrarily specified viscosity. It's still well below 1000 C, though.
@Ziraya010 ай бұрын
It will never be as accurate, and it might suffer from confounding circumstances, but you should be able to run a series of heating and cooling cycles, collecting temperatures from both thermocouples, and develop a calibration curve that makes the permanently installed thermocouple useful. As long as this tube survives this means you could potentially make it workable, while still having access to both ends, if say you wanted a setup with gas inlet at one end, and the vacuum pump on the other, or you wanted to develop a cap that somehow lets you push and pull the boats while they're already under modified atmosphere
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
right now i care more about accuracy than convenience, but i will continue to try to find a way to get the pesky thermocouple outside the tube
@putinsmoist350810 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflightIf you're really interested in temperature accuracy and removing the oxygen from the tube, i would move the thermal couple from one end and put it in the center, but cut a hole in the center quartz tube on one side to fit it. This will allow you to keep as many nichrome loops around the tube in the center. Submerge the tube under water to allow for heat and stress dissipation without cracking the tube and cut a hole with a glass bit in the center, seal it off with JB weld extreme heat which should be fine for 1,200C. I would then add a tube and a flage to the other end so you can purge the tube with inert gas after pulling a vacuum, then pulling the vacuum again. Argon can be obtained relatively cheaply (less than $20) from wine preserver bottles. It also gives you the option to use the other end for other projects like if you want to record the doping process with a camera
@azimh953410 ай бұрын
The way you explain your steps and assumptions, along with mentioning failures and successful results, is very helpful and interesting. Thanks for sharing such videos
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
thank you! it's been fun sharing one of my projects with everyone :)
@ericlotze772410 ай бұрын
20:15 I think someone else mentioned this, but depending on how hard of a vacuum you intend to pull this *could* be an issue. There are Vacuum Rated Epoxies/RTV Silocones for Vacuum Use if i remember correctly…granted for a price. That “Faraday Wax” someone on-KZbin made may be worth a look, that and/or a less “witches brew” and moreso just “this fraction of paraffin wax” or something type recipe may be neat. GRANTED “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it”, and the build is already coming along great! Just thought I’d throw this out there in case you didn’t already know about that and “virtual leaks” and all that. Keep up the great work!
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
I've actually used JB weld in high vacuum setups without issue. I've also got some corning high vacuum grease too
@beautifulsmall10 ай бұрын
Fascinating work. Ive used quartz rod for a clock pendulum due to its exceptionally low thermal expansion, nice work on the end caps. Hope the heatshring on the thermocouples doesn't leak vacuum, you can get ceramic feedthroughs but also glue lined heatshrink .
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
oh the heatshrink isn't doing any sealing- the epoxy takes care of that so it's not a problem. that being said i do want to learn more about non porous ceramics
@kalashchamlagai323910 ай бұрын
Damn, you are such an inspiring person man! Really loving what you do and breaking the limits of what a single person can as hobby! Please don't get discouraged because of less views and following, you will surely get the fame you deserve one day.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
working my way through the youtube algorithm lol
@bansci10 ай бұрын
Hey, great video again! Few suggestions below, but definitely include lathe work videos and keep up the amazing work! You can create an offset calibration curve for the external thermocouple, this is how many lab furnaces operate, as the hot spot is not usually very large and you're planning on putting the sample in the middle of it, giving a temperature offset anyway! I do this in my lab furnace which reaches 1500C so those radiation issues are massive. For your thermocouples, just buy thermocouple extension wire of whatever type you want, then use an acetylene torch (or spot welder) to melt the two wires together. Bam, now you have any length you like without any issues, and can shorten very easily (cut and remelt). Either a vacuum charger, or nitrogen/argon flush of the tube while loading might help remove some oxide growth. You could use your blank end to provide the flush?
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
I thought about doing that, but I was wary of adding any more sources of noise in the thermocouple measurement, especially since an offset of 10 or 20 degrees C can be pretty devastating to some processes. i like the idea of the nitrogen flush while loading- i may look into that
@bansci10 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflight I would say that in my experience getting temperature readings that precise in a furnace is possible, but requires careful measurement what ever way you approach it. We use an internal probe like you do to calibrate our carbolite furnaces, but our atmosphere would destroy them if we left them in, so we rely on the external sensor (used by the carbolite controller) to read and create a compensation curve for the internal conditions. This temperature offset is also a function of position along the tube so we take samples along the length to find the hot spot and it's size/shape, AND we even build test geometries of our crucibles and powders with the thermocouple buried inside to verify the final performance, as just putting a boat/crucible in causes a significant change in the radiation flux compared to no boat. If you're getting noise, this is probably due to electrical issues, I would definitely recommend borrowing a proper thermocouple meter to just verify your Arduino setup is right too
@EricDalgetty10 ай бұрын
The JB weld should definitely be fine outgassing-wise at these temperatures. I'm not sure if you said so, but make sure those threaded connections are sealed with either teflon tape (if they are NPT) or epoxy. Looks really good!
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
i like teflon or corning high vacuum grease for the task
@notanymore947112 күн бұрын
Jb weld will most likely outgas under vacuum. Torr seal is a vacuum grade epoxy.
@topoarwer82258 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing all of these DIY semiconductors content! I couldn't find any source on internet, which shows whole process keeping it simple and at the same time comprehensively discussing the topic. Just watched all videos on your channel and now patiently looking forward for updates on project. I also hope for some mosfets, because they're what's really used because of their energy effieciency. You could even make SSD like memory with NANDs if you will be able to grow floating gate on SiO2 to hold charge and therefore store data and another SiO2 layer on top of that for insulation and finally gate contact on top to change state of memory:)
@Mrcaffinebean10 ай бұрын
Man I have no real idea what this project is really for but I am impressed with your build skills and problem solving. Subbed!
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
goal is to build an integrated circuit eventually
@radojkosamja10 ай бұрын
Even the cleanest welding argon 5.0 can have impurities in some bottles. I had troubles with arc stability during aluminum TIG welding. I was prepared to send the machine for servicing, but after receiving advice to change the bottle, I was able to weld properly again.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
yeah i heard there is even some water in welding argon, which would be a huge problem for oxide growth (worse than o2 gas)
@Finnnicus10 ай бұрын
we use welding grade argon in the lab and dry it with a column of indicating silica gel. @@projectsinflight
@straphyr10 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflight I'm no expert, but I wonder if something like a molecular sieve filter would help clean up the argon (and maybe vacuum if ever needed). No idea the cost to buy or fab a filter for your purposes, it might not be practical. But I've been wondering where I'd see practical uses for them since Tech Ingredients used 3A sieves to concentrate alcohol a few years back and from what I find online, tube furnaces sometimes use them.
@zyeborm10 ай бұрын
@@straphyrthat is how it's done I believe even for fairly high purity argon it can still be quite wet.
@Peter_S_10 ай бұрын
Outstanding video as always. Great job on the clamps. 👍
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
thanks! i very much enjoyed machining them :)
@TheColorsInGreyLife10 ай бұрын
This was super cool to watch! Excited to see where the experiments will go.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
thank you! i am having a lot of fun making these :)
@electricalychalanged49117 ай бұрын
Hi. Verry nice video. I have some experience using tubular funaces in our lab. Though we are not using it for Silicone manipulation but for chemical syntheis. We are using a self made compression flange as well and I think our design is much simpler to make. If you are still interested I can share the design with you. Some other comments. If you start using gas flow I suspect that your O-Rings will melt . Even with massflowcontrollers, you have a significant heat transfer to the outgoing end at lest when you are using the furnace for days or weeks like we do regulary. I even had FFKM O-Rings melt on me! Also be aware that the glowing quarz tube creates significant UV-Radiation over 900°C wich will go into your flanges and heat them up eventually. Also if you wand to use Argon or other gases sure you will need a primary reduction valve but after that a needle valve and a buble counter with silicone oil on the other end will give you relativly fine controll over the gas flow. It might be enough for you. Finaly please!!! do not heat you quarz tube over 1100°C for longer than an hour. If you go longer you will reach the strain point of the Quarz wich basically creats a silicone oxide cristal growth chamber. Basically the glass will start to realine into its natural cristal structure on the surface of your tube wich creates strain over time, wich will eventually brake the tube. I have lost so many tubes because unknowing scientists were doing yust that.
@projectsinflight7 ай бұрын
this is very useful information! if you don't mind, would you send me an email? projects in flight at gmail dot com? i'd love to talk about the flange design
@Drjtherrien10 ай бұрын
In my lab we have to work with oxygen free atmospheres in tube furnaces, though in my case the furnace tube is alumina so that we can reach 1500 degC. One of the simplest ways to go is to use what is called a test plug. It is an expandable rubber stopper with a gas feedthrough. That works fine, but oxygen does still get in, so we would place a dish of titanium sponge in a hot, but not too hot zone of the tube upstream of the sample. This did a nice job reacting with any oxygen that would get in. But in the end, I bought two weldable quick connect flanges and used a liquid engine gasket compound to make an airtight seal between the flange and the tube. This holds vacuum very well. But with all that said, flowing argon at a slight positive pressure is not very expensive really and works way better than vacuum to keep oxygen out. The $1,000 for argon and a regulator is way overpriced unless you are talking about buying a large gas cylinder.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
yeah, i may have overestimated the cost a tiny bit. also, interesting that i didn't try a simple rubber stopper. i guess it just didn't come to mind. not sure how i'd have attached the flare fitting though
@en2oh10 ай бұрын
a vacuum muffle furnace.. BRILLIANT Thanks for sharing this with us
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
Thanks" Glad you liked the new furnace tube :)
@morgan010 ай бұрын
9:15 you could test it at a variety of temperatures, measuring both its relation and its lag. if the lag is slow enough, the temperature difference isn't an issue, since you can fit a function to the relationship between them, to get one from the other. if it's mostly radiative, i don't think it would lag all that much, would depend on what contribution conduction makes to it.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
i thought about doing that but i don't really trust myself to not introduce a significant (>20C) error
@morgan010 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflight fair enough
@klausnielsen153710 ай бұрын
Super impressive build and explanation along the way! Great work!😊
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
Glad you liked the new flanges!
@peter.s.320710 ай бұрын
You need to be using thermocouple extension wire of the same type as your thermocouple. Using soldered copper wire for your thermocouple cable will likely throw off your temps fairly significantly, as right now your cold junction is at the end of the flange. You'll have an error roughly equivalent to the temperature different between the flange and your thermocouple input, which is probably somewhere in the range of 20-80 kelvin of error
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
the flange is actually roughly at room temperature believe it or not. i was surprised at how quickly the heat dies off as you move away from the insulated part of the furnace
@peter.s.320710 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflight Oh wow, yeah I wouldn't have expected the temps to decrease so quickly that's pretty impressive insulating power. Still, probably good practice for accuracy's sake. Wouldn't want to be pulling your hair out at project randomly showing inconsistent results because of an uncontrolled +/-10C error
@kayakMike10009 ай бұрын
That region is DOPE!!
@JoshuaNorton10 ай бұрын
If you make heatsinks and clamp them on the tube right before your flanges, then you can prevent the heat being conducted all the way to the O-rings. Just in case if it ever becomes a problem.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
if it doesn't happen at 1200C i doubt it'll ever be a problem. those rings are rated at about 200C and it was only about 100C. Also, if it is a problem i'll rebuild the tube since it had to be shortened and the extra inch would probably lower the temp another 50C or so
@leocurious991910 ай бұрын
Argon does not need 2 regulators, all those for welding already include what you call secondary regulator. Also, since this is so wildly used for welding, it is dirt cheap. You can also use any hose you want, since you are not working with pressures. Note that you can turn on the vacuum pump seconds/minutes/hours before you actually need to use it. You do not need to turn it on right as you seal the vessel.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
standard welding regulator dispenses too much gas. i only need a tiny bit, like on the order of a few cc/min. that being said i probably overstated the cost associated with argon a bit and i'll likely add a purge input for inert gas to the setup
@leocurious991910 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflight Measuring that low will not be possible with a normal regulator (with rotameter), correct. But for those low values just bubble it through water to set it to what you need. If you bubble the output through water you not only meter the flow but also make sure to always have a bit of positive pressure in the system.
@ericlotze772410 ай бұрын
I was thinking, once sealed with gas fittings, if this could be used as a Catalytic Reactor for things like Ethanol to Ethane (Similar to @HyperSpacePirate ) , CO2 Methanation, The Haber Process, and *maybe* Fischer Troph? Granted pressure/temp requirements are probably different so this may be a bit of a…PIPE DREAM, but I figured using an existing, and well made, device would be easier!
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
tube furnaces are very versatile in chemistry for controlling the atmosphere of reactions. i'm sure you could use it- however, you might want to use stainless fittings instead of aluminum due to reactivitiy
@KallePihlajasaari10 ай бұрын
It may even be easier to add a internal metal pipe for the process chemistry but the tube furnace is a great way to heat the reaction.
@sapiosuicide155210 ай бұрын
Great work, keep it up!
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
thanks!
@ethanbjerke1877 ай бұрын
Beautiful machining, very impressive
@Xsiondu10 ай бұрын
I can see the future. 😊 Welcome back... Last video I made flanges. In today's video we will be adding a turbo molecular pump.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
I *probably* won't need to do this but i do actually have a turbo pump ready to go
@Xsiondu10 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflight stop it! Wait you built it didn't you.
@cagdasekinzohra300Күн бұрын
You can calculate the oxide formation rate by first calculating amount of Oxygen partial pressure in the tube and then looking at the ellingham diagram and checking the co-responding silicon line and its oxygen partial pressure needed at a given tempereature to form an oxide. You probably need to investigate how to read the ellingham diagram, it looks complicated but is very simple, there are some great youtube videos explaining it.
@mph875910 ай бұрын
Great math around the residual oxygen at the vacuum level, but you can flush the tube with Argon and then pull the vacuum, which means there shouldnt be more than 1E-5 oxygen that was in the Argon, which should be much less. edit: P.S. great project and thanks for sharing.I wish they were longer and more detailed, I just love the combination of engineering, DYI and physics!
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
thank you! i plan to try the argon purge soon
@agentgreengnome11 күн бұрын
Another factor affecting the external thermocouples is the conducted heat loss through the thermocouple wires. The internal TC in nearly isothermal near the tip, so no lead conduction loss from the measuring point. A chunky gauge TC traversing a steep temperature gradient, with only the tip touching is the worst case scenario. Choose an R, S, or B type thermocouple which can survive an oxidizing atmosphere, which would permit using thinner wires, and then wrap the tip at least 1/4 or 1/2 around the tube, so the tip is not involved in any TC lead conduction gradients. My $0.02
@TheHuntermj10 ай бұрын
An even better method of sealing the quartz tube is a simple cap with a rubber washer in it. It's easy to remove when off and the stronger the vacuum, the harder it pulls the cap on and compresses the tube end to end.
@the_runofff10 ай бұрын
days when you upload are always good days
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
I wish i could upload every day ;)
@matthewvenn10 ай бұрын
Can't wait to see the diffusion!
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
same here! it's been a long road to get here
@Andro5009 ай бұрын
I like what you are doing, please continue.
@denyaremov10 ай бұрын
You could measure internal temperature by knowing relation between temperatures of internal to external couple. Should be something similar to multiplying your external thermal couple temperature by 2 point something and then adding couple of degrees, a simple linear regression or can be any other kind of regression. Or it doesn't have to be linear you could just record temperature readings plot the results and see the actual relation yourself then just use the interpolation.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
yeah i didn't trust myself not to introduce another significant (>20C) temperature error so i didn't try that
@Mateo-wf1yz9 ай бұрын
No, go with the argon method. I hope he changes his mind, i must watch the rest. Well, i think i would have gone the argon method but it seemed to work well with vacuum also. Interesting and good video, thanks for sharing this stuff.
@BillDemos7 ай бұрын
Wow, such a nice video and so well presented! Thanks for the insights on glass seals. Now that you have a vacuum tube furnace, you could try putting some H2 inside, that would actually reduce any oxides, and even if your substrate was not clean enough, you could "clean" it in-situ! Also, for the external thermo-couple, yes, it doesn't see the same amount of infrared radiation, but doesn't it get due it heat diffusion at some point up to the temperature? If not, you could actually calibrate it, knowing what you get from the internal one, and not throw it away. Anyways, very fond of your channel, best regards.
@LegitNovelty4 ай бұрын
orings must rattle on the shaft, glass filled teflon so cool!
@jackmclane182610 ай бұрын
Purge the pipe with a tiny trickle of argon gas. You can get the Oxygen content into the ppb atmospheric equivalent range with argon purge and simple vacuum.
@yeetbeet4206910 ай бұрын
Great adjustments learned a little bit good video
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
thanks!
@infestus565710 ай бұрын
Youve now got a good vacuum system, and a hot furnace. I hear the sounds of CVD.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
i'm scared of the toxic chemistry involved right now but i might try it
@sleeptyper10 ай бұрын
I would add rubber grommets to the wire passthru holes, where you used glassfibre tubing. Timestamp 8:00
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
yeah i thought about that. i might try since there is a possibility of abrasion
@KulKlas3 ай бұрын
Wow nice, you are a smart boy my friend! 🙌🏻🙏🏻 love to see what people are up to! You getting a new subscriber!👍🏻
@projectsinflight3 ай бұрын
much appreciated!
@Guds77710 ай бұрын
Usually most welding supply shops sell small Argon bottles for hobbyist that doesn't cost that much. Argon setup for this purpose is 200 dollars max.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
i've been contemplating an argon purge before the vacuum as an economical fix
@amrstaha10 ай бұрын
Fascinating. Thank you for the great effort.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
thanks!
@xavermaier962510 ай бұрын
Can you do a workshop tour? I would be really interested in how you use your mill and lathe...
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
i'll do that just as soon as i get a scanning electron microscope ;)
@till291110 ай бұрын
I saw a Video from breaking taps about copper metalization with a Diode laser you can use that to make the conductive traces on the silicon
@imdaboythatwheheryeah10 ай бұрын
You could calibrate the thermocouple result, by comparing it to the inside thermocouple. I believe it should correlate to the inside temperature linearly, so calibration would be easily doable
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
i thought about it but i right now am not confident i can achieve the same temperature accuracy with such a method. perhaps in the future
@airtongabriel682710 ай бұрын
Can you check if termal diference is constant if it is you can just add the the diference
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
it may work, but i don't want to introduce any unnecessary sources of noise in the measurement
@ThalesManarin_10 ай бұрын
Now you could just flush the oxygen out with argon and then pull a vacuum, should work but might depend on how you plan to add the dopants. I've had some experience with tube furnace while making activated carbon using KOH and this flushing -> sealing method worked.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
i'll have to look into this. it seems like a good idea
@XA--pb9ni10 ай бұрын
Man i love this channel! keep going !
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
thanks! I plan to :)
@thesciencefurry10 ай бұрын
Idk why people keep saying borosilicate glass has such a high "melting point" It is higher than normal glass. But much lower than quarz glass. You even showed in the video that you can melt it with a normal torch ;D
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
that may be true, but after double checking these tubes are actually not even borosillicate at all
@hantrio432710 ай бұрын
The difference of the softening temperature is only 100K and the difference of the max working temperature only 30K. The advantage of borosilicate glass lies in the lower thermal expansion and higher chemical resistance
@omitsura10 ай бұрын
This is amazing, man!
@Kicikoci2810 ай бұрын
Never use a sodium silicate as separating layer between heating wire and quartz, because fused silica is not immune and will react with it on surface creating some kind of soda glass with much lower melting point than a quartz. As heating for operating 1200deg C only option is Kanthal A1( and equivalents ) in ribbon form , not a wire . Another thing is quartz (or fused silica ) can work up to max 1000 deg C for exdended period of time , higher temperature cause recrystalization of quartz , tube became opaque and very fragile.
@TheBaumLord10 ай бұрын
Nice oven upgrade, was kinda hoping for a flow setup but going vacuum/batch is still plenty good in 90% of cases. As others have mentioned the math for V(O2) is off, also im pretty sure the unit is written mol. I have never seen Mol before.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
yeah youtube removed the ability to add annotations to the video to correct things like this sadly. i pinned a comment which is the best i can do to correct this
@sto277910 ай бұрын
18:25 - Interested on making these compression tube fittings. Can you explain in more detail how this compression implementation for the fittings works? Thanks
@bretcannon382610 ай бұрын
When pumping down to pressures much below about 1% of atmospheric pressure, the vast majority of the gas is water vapor and not residual nitrogen or oxygen unless there is a significant leak in the vacuum system.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
that is probably true for systems at room temperature. i am not sure if it is true in this case, given the interior of the tube is extremely hot. it is possible that the water vapor is being boiled off aggressively and desorbed from the inner wall of the tube as a result. i suppose not all of the interior is at hundreds of degrees C though.
@bretcannon382610 ай бұрын
The end of the tube opposite from the pumping connection is near room temperature and so will be a continuing source of water vapor flowing through the tube and over the silicon wafers.
@RustyInventions-wz6ir10 ай бұрын
Very interesting. Nice work
@MJTVideos10 ай бұрын
You can use argon for much cheaper. I live in the US and got an argon setup for my lab. I have a 10 ish lb cylinder and I got it from airgas for like $200 ish and the regulator setup for like another $200 because I have both a flow regulator and a pressure regulator for pressurized inert atmospheres. It’s totally doable for not that much. Also if you want to get even cheaper, look up argon wine preservation. There are setups with decent sized cylinders for around 200$ for everything. One more thing, what vacuum pump are you using?
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
I'm concerned that the amount of argon required is high. i think you need at least 1cc/s flow rate, and i have no idea how much i'd need to refill the argon if i have to run several hour long diffusion steps
@subasurf10 ай бұрын
"it was slightly colder than before and the o-rings were firmer as a result" NASA management: "Write that down! write it down!"
@wackyvorlon10 ай бұрын
Did you use thermocouple wire for that lead? If you used regular wire that means your cold junction is at the end of the tube, and that will mess up the cold junction compensation.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
the cold junction is just outside the tube and is roughly at room temperature. i was surprised it wasn't super hot but i guess the tube actually doesn't conduct heat very well
@fallytp741710 ай бұрын
You should try to make an end cap with 2 tubes, one goes to the vacuum pump and the other goes to an argon tank. Just saying
@trabladorr10 ай бұрын
He can do that easily with the current setup, with a valve connected between the end cap and the vacuum pump: First pull a vacuum, then open the valve connected to argon to flhsh the tube with argon, then close it and pull another vacuum. The leftover oxygen should now be reduced by a few orders of magnitude!
@fallytp741710 ай бұрын
@@trabladorr You're right 👍, my bad fam
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
i've definitely been considering adding an argon purge for this reason
@kayakMike10009 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflightyou read my mind. Argon purge for the win!
@Argosh13 күн бұрын
I can only second this. One or two purge cycles and you can guarantee that the amount of oxygen molecules left in that thing is too low to even bother measuring.
@bobsagely81210 ай бұрын
Any ideas on how to get compression fittings without a lathe? Or are you pretty much just stuck having to buy them
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
i don't really think it's possible to make your own without a lathe, but you can always use the PVC pipe caps method instead
@bobsagely81210 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflightthe kf flanges have 24/40 glassware adapters which is what i need, pvc cap could just use a hose to the glassware I guess
@AJMansfield110 ай бұрын
2:10 You are way overthinking the setup needed for argon. You don't need any kind of seal better than a bit of aluminum foil or any regulator other than the primary regulator on the tank; you just prevent oxygen from leaking in through the cracks, by flowing enough argon to ensure you're only leaking _out_ those cracks.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
maybe so. I do like to overengineer my solutions sometimes
@AJMansfield110 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflight On the other hand, now you have a vacuum-capable system, which opens the door to a whole slew of techniques, like chemical vapor deposition or other reactive gas processes.
@ericlotze772410 ай бұрын
15:18 Wait I’ve seen this one before…
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
i cry every time
@sumguysr10 ай бұрын
This is a pretty small volume. Thermal sputtering some titanium wire might get you a much better vacuum.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
a titanium sublimation pump would definitely work to remove air but i'd be better off using a turbo pump instead because of concerns over contamination
@sumguysr10 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflight I was just thinking a bit of wire and a high voltage is a bit easier to come by.
@GermanMythbuster10 ай бұрын
Why not leave the vacuum pump running while the furnace is heating up? There is such a low mass of hot air in there left anyway it won't damage your pump and you get a even better vacuum. Also there are small 1L Argon bottles with 100 Bar for like 25$. The trick is to just get a cheap valve for them and use it to fill a balloon. Now you have a nice low pressure gas for flushing :) 2 or 3 Flushes and your vacuum is free of oxygen. You can do Argon flushing for under 100$, of cause not pretty but this is science not a beauty contest 😄
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
it takes a while for the furnace to come up to temperature. however, it's possible that i could start at say 700C, put the chip in, then vacuum the air and then crank it to 1000C and not have to wait too long. that would only take an additional 6 minutes and not introduce much error
@FlyGamingChannel10 ай бұрын
Great series. Please show the lathe work next time.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
if people are interested i can make a whole video and making those flanges
@shoumikahmed637310 ай бұрын
May be you can flush out the oxygen within the tube with argon before vacuuming to reduce oxygen or connect argon to the end of the tube so that if leak is present, it takes argon other than air. By the way, when I saw the test tube started melted that easily with butane torch, I was sure it will be melted in the furnace 🤭🤭
@DC_DC_DC_DC10 ай бұрын
The solution to pollution......
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
i have a glassblowing friend and i kept thinking: "he totally would have not let me make that mistake if he were here"
@Hepad_10 ай бұрын
Could you add some material with a high surface to volume ratio that gets oxidized alongside the wafer and consumes the oxygen ? I'm thinking of copper dendrites
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
any copper in the tube would risk contaminating the silicon. Copper ions are a bad dopant and ruin its electrical properties
@Hepad_10 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflight any material that suits your constraints !
@petroskard693710 ай бұрын
love you videos you have gaven me alot of adias
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
thanks! glad to be able to make interesting things
@Naturesyouth10 ай бұрын
This is fascinating, would it be possible to add a material that sublimates into an inert gas either with temp rise or pressure drop to further remove oxygen ?
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
so, it's actually really interesting that you bring this up specifically. you see, the most common dopant for silicon is phosphorus pentoxide, which sublimates at 600C and reacts with the silicon to form a phosphorus-glass layer on the surface. what's interesting is that the dopant actually contributes small amounts of oxygen, so the need to totally purge the reaction chamber of oxygen is not really necessary
@Naturesyouth10 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflight that's really cool! I look forward to seeing where this goes!
@andytroo10 ай бұрын
could you combine the two appraoches - flush with non-oxygen, and create a moderate vacuum - and do you need to use oxygen - could nitrogen be a cheaper flush?
@6alecapristrudel10 ай бұрын
3:44 The 22.4 number comes from something else! It's the INVERSE! It's how many liters one mole of gas occupies!
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
oh man... what a silly oversight. oh well
@xavermaier962510 ай бұрын
Also more machining videos please
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
if people want them i'd be happy to provide
@senorjp2110 ай бұрын
If you put something in the tube that reacts quickly and completely with oxygen maybe you could just use up all the oxygen. Like magnesium? That would happily react with the oxygen and form high temperature stable magnesium oxide with a 2500 C melting point
@TheKubux10 ай бұрын
Then, you risk magnesium contamination as the leftover magnesium will start to evaporate.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
yeah i shy away from adding chemicals into the furnace because even nanograms of vapor can contaminate the silicon
@w__a__l__e10 ай бұрын
hey man hit the groves on the brass bung with some Emory board to slightly champher the material so it doesn't cut your o rings!
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
i hit them with a chamfer tool but didn't show that clip in the video
@w__a__l__e10 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflight therefor it didnt happen. lol my bad.. also i made that comment mid way.. i was thinking you should make external claps. great work man!
@infestus565710 ай бұрын
3D-Prints are even with 100% Infill not airtight. Trying to fix that is not worth the hustle.
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
yeah hence why i used aluminum ;)
@ErikLevholt10 ай бұрын
isnt the nicely homemade compression flange on backwards? it looks like the o-ring sealing part wont make much difference? whats keeping the seal between the end of the glass tube and the big open gap between the halves of the compression fitting?
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
sorry, my diagram may not have done a good job showing it. the front oring (closest to the flange) does all the heavy lifting and seals against the tube, the front flange piece, and the coupling piece
@joli2210 ай бұрын
wouldn't making a thread around the whole inner/outer piece be better for this? then you wouldn't have to worry about tightening the 4 bolts too much one by one, or not equally tightening them
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
it would be an appropriate solution, but i chose to make it this way because i saw it as a slightly easier machining operation
@electrodeyt349110 ай бұрын
Well, now I know what I need to add to my (mental) design of a tube furnace lol
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
eventually i'll iterate through everything and make a single video on the best way to build the furnace lol
@draganjekic4187Ай бұрын
Why didnt you get another attachemt and conected argon, then you pull a vacum again, then you pump arogon again. You do this few times and most of the air in tube is argon.
@projectsinflightАй бұрын
For now, the vacuum alone seemed ok, but i want to upgrade to argon in the future
@papanyanz10 ай бұрын
I think if you purge your system few times with inert gas before final evacuation there will be even less oxygen left in there
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
yeah i'll probably try that at some point soon
@jimsvideos720110 ай бұрын
Nice work on the flanges. Any concerns about their weight causing the tube to deflect?
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
so far it seems to be just fine. i was considering adding some supports to the tube near the flanges though
@KulKlas3 ай бұрын
This “vacuum gauge digital reader” wher did you bay this one?
@projectsinflight3 ай бұрын
Uniweld UVG. Not sure if they are still making them but the company was super helpful when i troubleshooted it (wasn't the gauges fault it turned out)
@KulKlas3 ай бұрын
@@projectsinflight thanx bro🙌🏻🙏🏻
@crackedemerald49307 ай бұрын
if glass sucks at tension, then how come fiberglass is so strong?
@projectsinflight7 ай бұрын
i believe that it's the improved flexibility of the glass fibers that increases the tensile strength of fiberglass. the fibers have some ability to move without cracking in a way that solid glass does not. Add to that the strength of the epoxy resin, and the fact that crack in a single glass fiber won't propagate to others like it would in a piece of solid glass.
@RobertL199910 ай бұрын
For oxide thickness have you tried a weigh strip weigh method?
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
not sure what you mean
@sashimanu10 ай бұрын
O-rings and low temperatures, I think I’ve heard that before
@projectsinflight10 ай бұрын
thank god lives don't depend on my engineering
@ango70877 ай бұрын
what kind of glue are you using to stick coil heater element? thank you
@projectsinflight7 ай бұрын
refractory cement
@neilredelinghuys326310 ай бұрын
what if you flush the tube with an enert gas and then pull the vacuum?