Really pleased you took the time to do this valuable comparison Jake. As an original Mavic 3 owner (who wants to upgrade to the Pro), I was curious to see the differences. Much appreciated.
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much and you are most welcome
@burakcan717211 ай бұрын
In the pro model, the camera should have 20x optical zoom, 4k video and 5.1k photos
@burakcan717211 ай бұрын
In the pro model, the camera should have 20x optical zoom, 4k video and 5.1k photos
@Atsf1976Ай бұрын
On another Mavic 3 video, you had mentioned how the 7x zoom had autofocus issues. I take videos of trains and I was wondering if you think that I would have issues with the autofocus when using the 7x zoom. Thanks for your time and thanks for your honest reviews of the equipment.
@JakeSloanАй бұрын
I think you would be ok especially now. They have updated the camera and lens on the 3 pro and it’s significantly better. Also for trains you likely would want to use manual focus for photos a lot and I’ve seen some spectacular images done with it
@Atsf1976Ай бұрын
@ thanks, but I’m talking the mavic 3, not the mavic 3 pro.
@vonheise Жыл бұрын
If my memory is correct, one of the earlier complaints about the Autel was that it exaggerated sharpness, which can be either good or bad, but it would be nice to be able to adjust it in the settings or as you said, just turn off the change. I hate doing much editing as it is a slow process for me. I prefer to take time setting up the camera rather than additional editing. I actually like the Mavic 3 coloration better in some cases, especially with trees or green colors.
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
agreed on all counts lol
@AbstractFilms Жыл бұрын
Any clue what those white orbs / specs are flying across your screen at 0:47 & 0:48? I've captured a few over the years and they can be distracting.
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
Those are cotton wood tree seeds blowing in the wind. The telephoto lenses will make them super obvious
@MavicAir2TW Жыл бұрын
I prefer Mavic 3, the max flight time is longer, the max flight distance is longer. It would be awesome if Mavic 3 Pro can support Ocusync 4.0 (up to 20km video transmission) with. DJI RC 2 or RC Pro 2 if available.
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
Agreed!
@flatheadprints Жыл бұрын
Well done Jake, I didn't consider the Pro until I saw how much better it is. I guess my Mavic 3 is officially for sale now.
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
LOL well I would only do that IF you use the tele camera a lot otherwise I dont think it's worth it
@CaminoAir Жыл бұрын
Really appreciate this video, Jake. Not only for answering a key question about the M3 Pro for M3 owners......but also I need to relax after having just completed both my aviation authority drone licence renewal and my drone insurance policy renewal. And I'm only a recreational pilot! I can't imagine what the e-paperwork (and online technical glitches/quirks) would be like for a professional such as yourself.
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
Thanks so much! there definitely is a lot involved
@SunriseWaterMedia Жыл бұрын
3:06 Jake on the right, "look, something shiny!"
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
actually I think it was: "was that a bear???"
@SunriseWaterMedia Жыл бұрын
@@JakeSloan Oh right!!! Ha ha yikes!
@no15minutecities Жыл бұрын
What about RAW stills from each camera???
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
what about them? They are ok at best, the mavic 3 pro is definitely better
@Thephotowanderer Жыл бұрын
Hi i really loved your video H265 video is lagging on my pc during playback , would you have any suggetion to remove the lag . I have a mavic 3 cine Thanks
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
try recording in h264, many times that is easier for computers to work with
@BlueDroneBlues Жыл бұрын
The Mavic 3 on the close up showing background looks better. Background on the pro looked more blurred out. The Pro looked darker side by side thought cloud’s playing a factor. Most people like me watching this on an iPhone can’t see any big difference besides one being darker than the other. I guess it depends on what your intent is?
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
The pro will be a little more blurred out since it has the 3.4f stop over the 4.4 f-stop of the mavic 3
@CLIFFLIX Жыл бұрын
I'm seeing gobs and GOBs of EXTREME noise reduction! It seems like DJI's image processor programmer manager said: "OK guys.....let's completely OBLIERATE even the smallest amount of noise grain. Let's make this image completely void of ANY texture. If I see even a SPEC of grain,...you are FIRED" So? They set the spatial and temporal noise reduction parameters to "100%" across the board. This is why we see this image look "WAX". Uggg,....guys,...RELAX on the noise reduction!
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
agreed I really wish they would give us control over it
@CruisePerspectives10 ай бұрын
Hey great stuff Jake, tell me what’s the comparison like with the 3x lens vs the standard lens cropped in to 3x (using better lens, better sensor and adjustable aperture) is the 3x lens provide any better results?
@JakeSloan10 ай бұрын
you definitely get better quality from the 3x camera because you loose a LOT of resolution from the main camera cropping in that far
@FlyZoneFpv Жыл бұрын
awesome comparison jake. yes the pro has a bit more focus and sharpening
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
thanks and agreed
@haydeezz6 ай бұрын
how is the zoom comparation ? they have same quality zoom image ?
@JakeSloan6 ай бұрын
The pro has a better image. Its subtle but it’s definitely better
@reishimo6390 Жыл бұрын
Is the Pro Cine version worth? I might need one for TV docs but I'm not sure if ProRess is really better than H.265....
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
It is in your use case. I use the mavic 3 cine for lots of TV show shoots and all the colorists I have given footage to have been very happy working with the pro res. The few times I have used h265 or h264 footage they have mentioned they much prefer the prores
@reishimo6390 Жыл бұрын
@@JakeSloan Thank you so much Jake! It is great to know colourists opinions.
@petersuvara Жыл бұрын
Thanks. Much appreciated, don't feel like I lose out too much on the mavic 3.
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
Glad to help
@dragonshivu Жыл бұрын
Interesting to see the jump in quality.
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
there definitely is a jump
@dronemagics730111 ай бұрын
Thanks for the review, although I think there is an important aspect that is missing: using the x7 camera IN MOTION. I own a Mavic 3 and the x7 camera is not really usable in terms of quality ( resolution, dynamic range etc, ) from medium to pro works. Last autumn I rented a Mavic 3 Pro for a paying gig and it worked superbly. The M3Pro x7 camera quality was great, the footage editor in post production was able to match and integrate the main 24mm camera, to the x3 cam , the x7 camera shots AND all the other MILC ( Sony A7 series ) camera shots that were also used on the scenes ! Now, the interesting thing is that I also made some short tests with the two drones' x7 cameras during that day, and from my window aiming the neighbouring trees and houses, IN STATIC postition, there was hardly any difference in quality between the two x7 cameras ! BUT when flying, shooting moving objects the difference is enormous... the M3Pro is good and usable, the M3 is unusable. I am still looking for an explanation... ( I will also make this comparison in a vlog format when I'll have the time )
@JakeSloan11 ай бұрын
I believe ti has to do with the bitrate of the camera. the mavic 3 pro can film in 10bit 4.2.0 on the 7x camera up to 60fps where the mavic 3 can only film 8bit 4.2.0. DJI did something to allow better quality from the mavic 3 pro vs the mavic 3 on the 7x camera
@ryanmcdonnell793 Жыл бұрын
what software were you using to compare the side by side shots?
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
I was using Final Cut Pro to edit and review the shots
@johnnybermudez Жыл бұрын
As always Jake well done. That 100k Subscriber plaque is so well deserved. Thanks for always sharing your insight brother! 🙏🏼🎥
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
I appreciate that!
@BrendanRiley7 ай бұрын
what software are you using for video editing?
@JakeSloan7 ай бұрын
Final Cut Pro
@JonnyRay82 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for making this comparison. It was VERY useful!
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@fredrikwilles5299 Жыл бұрын
Tack!
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
🤙
@DavieMorgan10 ай бұрын
Jake how much Flight time you getting until your 1TB storage is full using Pro Res buddy ?
@JakeSloan10 ай бұрын
Flight time or recording time? Flight time about 35-38min depending on how I’m flying. Recording time about 45-50min of prores HQ
@marianriabic9573 Жыл бұрын
I understand that you shoot mostly video and hence the sharpness uniformity across the frame is not as closely scrutinised as it is by stills shooters which I am one of. There has been fair bit of discussion going on various forums where people were troubled by soft blurry areas in their photos taken with the main 24mm Hassy camera. Have you looked into this? It would be nice to get your take on this. Some people have apparently returned 7 units and still see the same issue. I went through four Mavic3 before I got a reasonably good one so this is starting to look like a systemic lens problem with the main camera on all Mavic3 models
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
I shoot a lot of photos with mine and and I am now on my 5th mavic 3 and none of them have had any issues and when I say a lot of photos I mean a LOT of photos including work for very high end rendering architecture firms
@marianriabic9573 Жыл бұрын
@@JakeSloan Thanks for your reply. It is good to know.
@SimplyScotlandPhotography Жыл бұрын
@DJI Get Mr Sloan on the list. Best reviews by a Royal Mile
@CaminoAir Жыл бұрын
I second that. Long overdue, DJI.
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
thank you both!
@SunriseWaterMedia Жыл бұрын
Interesting how different they are!
@BlairAir Жыл бұрын
The difference is astounding. No minor tweaks here.
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
agreed
@paulmorris4759 Жыл бұрын
Very informative. Thanks!
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
You're welcome
@milankarakas30054 күн бұрын
I have DJI mini 2, and I was happy with the quality until I saw videos with Mavic 3 Pro. I am tempted to buy new one, but I am having problem with budget. Wanted to buy new PC with better CPU. So, I should to make decision - to buy Mavic 3 Pro, or keep small one but with better PC for image processing and also 3D work which require really good computer. Thank you for showing me how looks really good quality videos from that beauty.
@JakeSloan3 күн бұрын
glad this helped!
@mxrz Жыл бұрын
The aperture difference is not even one full stop of light, it's a marginal improvement. They could have improved the tele lens significantly, if they didn't include that third lens.
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
agreed and thats why I said marginal at best
@navpreetsingh8156 Жыл бұрын
Perfect just what I was looking for, thanks
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
Glad it helped!
@RaminAbbasnezhad8 ай бұрын
Hello, I have some questions about mavic 3 pro. I have DJI RC-RM330 Smart Controller for my drone mavic 3 pro. I dont see at all ( format code: D log m and apple pro res 422 in main (x1) and second (x3) camera, 12 mb or 48 mb resolution pixel in second camera) in cine and normal version. I bought my drone july 2023 and did not update my drone until now. Should I update at all? Does anyone knows the answer?
@JakeSloan8 ай бұрын
You will only have the pro res option if you purchased the mavic 3 pro cine edition
@Squirrel-Chaser8 ай бұрын
I really wanted that 7x.... but I couldn't justify paying over a grand more for it, and went with the Air 3 instead... But man, that looks gorgeous. Are your shots grades, or is that the raw footage?
@JakeSloan8 ай бұрын
That's mostly the raw footage with some slight exposure adjustments to match them up
@vihat_studio20005 күн бұрын
What is Edit Software ???
@JakeSloan4 күн бұрын
I use Final Cut Pro
@Drone_Journey5 ай бұрын
i have the mavic 3 classic and think that the mavic 3 is really cool because 7x just gives you special opportunities , but i would never EVER think about buying the pro! for me in europe the weight difference just changes everything and i wouldnt sacrifice the C1 label just for the 3x zoom
@JakeSloan5 ай бұрын
yeah in the EU loosing the C1 label is a big deal
@BlairAir Жыл бұрын
Well considered and useful to those on a fence. I'm really pleased with the Pro, all things considered, and agree with your assessment! A bit comicsl that the folks moaning about the upcoming Air 3 not having a 1 inch sensor absolutely love the 1-1/3 paired with the 70mm equivalent lens. I wouldn't argue against a larger main sensor, but for KZbin production the Air 3 will be a great setup. 10 m/s Ascend & Descend speeds are faster than Mavic 3, O4 transmission, fast charging, long flight times, etc. aren't enough, wait. I'm sure DJI will tweak imaging options now that the form factor is set. Its an agile, efficient and modernized platform.
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
thanks and I agree on the Air 3,I cannot wait to test one out
@gcarmichael Жыл бұрын
Well done. The Classic model has a longer battery life and can record in 4K 60 fps. I still cant see the attraction to a zoom lens that changes image quality.
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
thanks
@MarkH163 Жыл бұрын
Definitely like the Mavic 3 Pro Cine better, wow how cool is that in the close up detail!
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
Totally agree!
@maker3440 Жыл бұрын
Beautiful shots :) Amazing :)
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot!
@BLAKEISHart Жыл бұрын
Do you prefer 265 over 264
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
I prefer h265 over h264 but the difference is very small
@Thephotowanderer Жыл бұрын
Hi i really loved your video H265 video is lagging on my pc during playback , would you have any suggetion to remove the lag . I have mavic 3 cine Thanks
@waverunneradventuregfx Жыл бұрын
From India..☺️
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
cheers
@mathew896 Жыл бұрын
Can you take photos with the zoom?
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
Yes you can
@TasmanianTiger88 Жыл бұрын
Awesome, really as expected I would say. Everyone outside the EU can enjoy the MA3 Pro with no limit due to its weight. I downgraded myself from the pro purchase to the regular M3 to be able to fly in the C1, so it's not a legacy drone render it useless. People in the U.S and Canada gets all the goodies, FCC and no stupid weight rules.
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
that is really unfortunate for EU people...
@jesserik2000 Жыл бұрын
I really want a drone with hassleblad camera and 3x zoom. There isn't one, thinking of just buying a used M3 so I can use my M3P controller with the original Mavic.
@johnmajka54046 ай бұрын
I have 6 DJI Drones, but my best 2, are my AIR 2S, & AIR 3, I also have the Mini 4 Pro, Mini 3 Pro, Mini 3, & FPV Drone. All fly more combos. I love my AIR 3 & I like filming wildlife, I can get pretty close with my AIR 3, & that 3 power optical zoom helps, but I need more zoom capabilities. I just got the Autel Evo Lite Plus Premium Bundle, but I think im going to send it back & get the Mavic 3 Pro for the zoom. I would wait for the Mavic 4 & AIR 4 to come out in August, but im scared, that if I wait, for the AIR 4 or Mavic 4, the DJI Drone Ban will pass the Senate, & and I'll be screwed. Im currently studying for my Part 107.
@JakeSloan6 ай бұрын
you should wait just a bit and see if the new leaked DJI drone comes out soon. Even if the DJI ban passes we have time and any currently approved products will still be for sale
@maidn1887 Жыл бұрын
not worth to upgrade for the money. but thx for video
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
I'm glad this video helped you make that decision
@ShootswithnitoАй бұрын
My mavic 3 zooom in really far without loosing detail
@JakeSloanАй бұрын
It can
@marraben9 ай бұрын
Have to say I prefer the color on the mavic 3, there appears to be a cooler + magenta cast to the pro footage… am I the only one seeing it 😵💫
@JakeSloan9 ай бұрын
There definitely is a color difference between the 2.
@jimanderson4865 Жыл бұрын
Hi Jake. Great video. My M3 will have to do for now. Not looking to win an emmy....😂😂
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
hahahahahahah thanks for that
@kevindiossi Жыл бұрын
This is the first I’ve seen these two compared for their telephoto lenses and I’m happy to find it. WOW…the colors on the Mavic 3 Pro telephoto are legitimately terrible. I don’t care about the sharpness difference that much for the shots I’m getting with mine, but I do care about blue shadows, toxic greens, and magenta colors off the 3 Pro. The shots on the Original Mavic looks natural and the 3 Pro shots looks like they need a lot of work to get colors where they need to be.
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
They take a bit more work to get them where they need to be for sure
@no15minutecities Жыл бұрын
rubbish
@steelgtr3 ай бұрын
All you drone footage is so soft. Video from your main video is sharp so it's not me :)
@JakeSloan3 ай бұрын
VERY different lenses cameras and sensors sooooo idk what to tell you
@trimotionmedia5487 Жыл бұрын
Solid video. I have both, and definitely notice a difference in quality. Only gripe I'd say in this comparison video is that the drone will nearly NEVER EVER be used to get a close up shot like that of your face. Need more practical use examples for how content creators and professionals will be using the camera :) Good video! I like your A Roll talking framing, scene and background
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
LOL but it does show detail like nothing else, the trouble with moving shots is they are EXTREMELY difficult to match up thus I only did one.
@navpreetsingh8156 Жыл бұрын
The Mavic 3 cine seems steadier
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
both of these are the CINE version of the Mavic 3 but the Pro does seem to do a little better
@jesusgjchuza6491 Жыл бұрын
😎😎
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
😉
@techunboxing8933 Жыл бұрын
Why is this crap more expensive then my computer lol
@JakeSloan Жыл бұрын
because its a computer that also flies and takes great videos and photos?
@bushmanphotos11 ай бұрын
wtf is with the background music drowning out your voice???? It's not even nice music and it drowns out your voice makes it unwatchable in places.
@JakeSloan11 ай бұрын
BS, the music is more than 30db lower than my voice... at no time does the music "down out" my voice, there are lots of parts where I am not talking just showing examples.
@filmprojohanwagner Жыл бұрын
Great comparison Jake. I found the difference to be a bit bigger: kzbin.info/www/bejne/g2aph39joZqjd8k -Thanks for all your efforts.