Hey all - earlier video this week to cover this release of the M2s: So what do you think? Is this the best sounding mini Wireless Microphone yet? Does it really compete with the DJ for features? Watch this next for my full creative desk setup kit on a budget: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iXmwpWqCg9t-ZpI
@petercofrancesco98125 күн бұрын
I can hear a difference but I think it's mainly due to mic positioning. While M2s is more convenient clipping it to the collar near your throat and under the chin loses the high tones. The DJI has less bass but the mid chest is the best lav position (I actually prefer it). Like you said for paid interview gig it be stressfully relying on either. I really do like the design of the M2s, although the market is getting flooded with these type of wireless mics in all manner of shape, size and features.
@paulhall1114 күн бұрын
I prefer the DJI Mic Mini for its fuller and brighter sound. It's a winner for me.
@mypawgi6 күн бұрын
if your using DJI cameras...i think DJI mini is best option since it can be connected without the receiver
@BetterCreating6 күн бұрын
Yep totally.
@Crazypostman4 күн бұрын
My opinion is the M2S has a deeper, less "sparkly" audio. More of a flat EQ, to my ear
@RoryWalker928 күн бұрын
Great review and video! I’m a new subscriber and I’ve been loving your Apple product reviews. I’ve decided to purchase a base M4 Mac Mini based on your review! Keep up the great content!
@BetterCreating8 күн бұрын
Awesome! Thank you! Yeah - I think the M4 Mac Mini is a fantastic deal at the moment. Hope you enjoy it :)
@itsr7studioКүн бұрын
Fantastic review, Simon! I’ve been looking for something that is compact and has decent sound for Zoom work calls. The AirPods Pro have such a frustratingly tinny sound that I don’t wish upon others! I love my Rode mics, but they take up space on my desk for day-to-day (keeping them for when I need to record online tutorials or have a big presentation). Thanks to your thorough review, I ordered the M2S! I’m surprised by the quality of the audio (even without noise cancellation) in my untreated home office, the compact form, and ease of use.
@BetterCreating3 сағат бұрын
Awesome - totally agree - these are perfect for quality calls easily - and fair for the money :)
@RedWolfe2 күн бұрын
I did find myself liking the “DGEEI” sound quality better while listening to you on my Sony WH-1000XM5 headphones. It sounded fuller overall to me with less of that subtle high end whine that can created by noise cancellation. I ended up going with the Mic Mini and I like how I can leave the USB-C adapter connected to the transmitter and it still fits nicely into the case making it easy to just remove from the case and it’s ready to plug into my 15 Pro Max. The larger size of the transmitter on the Mic Mini vs the Hollyland can be an issue. The tight clearance when I used it with my Osmo 6 did cause me concern. Thanks for the comparison.
@BetterCreating2 күн бұрын
Haha - yes - can’t help myself on that one! Ha. Totally agree here on the ability to leave the usb-c attached. It’s fine on the phone but I worry I could knock it and break it. :)
@xaviermagana295518 сағат бұрын
It's kinda contradictory, but a fix for the deadcats is to shave/cut the hairs just a little bit. I did that with my Lark M1 and Lark Max and i reduced them quite significantly without loosing the windscreens capacity to control excess noise
@BetterCreating3 сағат бұрын
nice idea! Haircut time?
@RichardWilson3973 күн бұрын
Both great products, I prefer the DJI's build quality.
@BetterCreating3 күн бұрын
Same here - just - on build quality and all-in-one portability - it's just so much better all in the case - but I would say I love the M2s for video calls via the USB-C reciever - I think it's best for that use case.
@djxcel232 күн бұрын
How do you use the usb-c to lighting cable that is included?
@BetterCreating2 күн бұрын
Yes - it just plugs into the receiver as an option for lighting version - so. It so great as far as I can tell - I would go for the M2 if you want lighting direct to a phone.
@AlexRyan_7 күн бұрын
The lark noise canceling is much more noticeable but seems more flat IMO
@BetterCreating7 күн бұрын
Yes - a little - bit changing it to low is better - I had the DJI on low which is much better
@Fredo.heavyy8 күн бұрын
We don’t need more wireless mics without internal recording & 32bit float 🗣
@BetterCreating8 күн бұрын
I do agree - I'd like to see these companies release a Pro version with those features!
@Frank5Gmedia8 күн бұрын
Well said bro
@orvet7 күн бұрын
I’d humbly say it depends on the use case. For video calls 32-bit float etc is not needed. Ease of use however is key. IMHO it’s good to have different gear for different occasions/needs. Yes it’s more expensive to buy two bits of gear but the single perfect product doesn’t exist 😜
@Fredo.heavyy7 күн бұрын
@ Except the OG Hollyland lark M2 was released a year ago. This "new" model has same old specs and no innovation. It's a text book cash grab product + we already have exact clones of these mics for Mobile user from many other brands.
@orvet6 күн бұрын
@@Fredo.heavyy The design is the innovation and USP: visible size, lack of logo. And the sound quality is IMHO very good. Not every bit of a product needs to be entirely new for a product to be worth releasing. Cash grab, I respectfully disagree. That particular light can be shone with more certainty on other brands.
@m1kel7 күн бұрын
i reckon the usbc phone receiver does not need to be charged like the m2 (orig)
@BetterCreating7 күн бұрын
That’s right - it take power from the device.
@evareikilife8 күн бұрын
Maybe you know, if it will be in white color, coz i never wear black clothes…( would buy white ones immediately!!!
@BetterCreating7 күн бұрын
Nice idea - I think they may do it at somepoint!
@wirafajarsejahtera91538 күн бұрын
who win?
@BetterCreating7 күн бұрын
I think I like the M2s best for sound quality and the DJI for everyday carry and use with filming. :)
@tenzinseeds68784 күн бұрын
Bon3 to pick 😂😂😂
@andyz_w35848 күн бұрын
Greata honestly Comparision, thank you Bro. M2s looks sounds better. could you do some 32bit microphones?
@BetterCreating8 күн бұрын
Thanks my friend - yes - if I can get some I will do! I think the Rode Wireless Pro is the choice for 32 bit float at moment
@MoncefVortex7 күн бұрын
They were all sounding great until you used the MKH50 which destroyed them 😆
@BetterCreating7 күн бұрын
Haha - Sorry! Yes - but it’s 7x the cost + the rod-caster: nice thou :)
@MoncefVortex7 күн бұрын
@@BetterCreating yes, it's much more expensive, and they have different purposes. Thank you very much for the great video!
@sneeks7 күн бұрын
Are any of these microphones suitable for capturing ambient audio while on the move? I occasionally use a phone mounted on a gimbal and follow alongside pipe bands and brass bands, will these capture the audio from these ok? The iPhone microphone struggles with wind noise and clipping while walking alongside the bands.
@JWNRW596 күн бұрын
@@sneeks As the Hollyland is Omni-directional, I would expect it to be able to pick up some ambient noise.
@AJTrucker6 күн бұрын
It’s DJI, not DGI
@BetterCreating6 күн бұрын
Yeah totally - I just can’t get myself to say it! Haha
@Crazypostman4 күн бұрын
If I'm not actively thinking about it and trying to enunciate, it sounds like I say DGI also
@CAMTechChrisКүн бұрын
No shit! You really think he didn't know it's DJI not DGI??
@BetterCreating3 сағат бұрын
@ haha. I think there was a cycle brand called DGI when I was younger who made pedals or something... it's baked in!
@psoon042868 күн бұрын
I have used Hollyland products, they are pretty good but at this time any new mini mics coming into the market have to be divided into ‘no internal recording’ or ‘ able to do internal recording’. Most other features are nearly identical
@BetterCreating7 күн бұрын
Yes interesting - internal recording - we need it on these! I think the sound is better on these new Hollyland M2s than the old version thou…
@JWNRW597 күн бұрын
The Fulaim X5M is another compelling option as well. It’s not a mini mic, but is very very good all around. These mini mics are interesting, but are we pushing smaller size just for the sake of smaller size?? The M2S is pretty competitive and clearly price point will be lower than the DJI. Don’t think you can go wrong to be honest with either.
@BetterCreating7 күн бұрын
I actually think the size hasn’t changed - just what is shown - the mic feels better on quality and quiet noise floor too - much improved IMO over M2 :)
@mex53416 күн бұрын
yes, Fulaim is good! but the size ...
@JWNRW596 күн бұрын
@@mex5341 Funny that the size of the Fulaim mic was sufficient before the DJI mini. The allure of the smaller form factor really is compelling, I must say. When my Fulaim X5 dies, I’ll likely go for one of the mini mics.
@mex53416 күн бұрын
@@JWNRW59 i have x5 but i need smth smaller like this m2s.
@JWNRW596 күн бұрын
@@mex5341 Makes sense - if you need the smaller form factor. The X5 is a couple of years old at least now but admit it’s getting a bit long in the tooth for me as I use it every day in remote meetings between 4-6 hours 3 to 4 days a week. It’s been a trooper but happy to see these newer smaller form factors coming into play.
@reedeema8 күн бұрын
Man i just love Hollyland .. Ever since the M1s ...
@BetterCreating7 күн бұрын
These are very good with a low noise floor :)
@teamkaskas8 күн бұрын
The lark M2 sounds better than the mini and m2s
@BetterCreating7 күн бұрын
Interesting - yes they are well loved - I notice it’s a mix of preferences across these three - so all all are very good - just comes down to taste perhaps :)
@tiemji4 күн бұрын
Thanks for this review. Those M2s looks really great especially the design not too much visible compared to other. Thanks for sharing
@BetterCreating3 күн бұрын
No problem!
@musicforever51948 күн бұрын
Nice review! Is it possible to measure the audio latency of these mics? How many ms have through 3.5mm output? Thank you very much!
@rickicoughlan4 күн бұрын
I picked up the Lark M2S and will be testing it over the coming weekend.
@BetterCreating3 күн бұрын
Hope you enjoy it - it's a real close call on the DJI - I think i prefer the DJI for mirrorless video work on the go, the M2s for video calls and use with a Mobile.
@agambhasin6 күн бұрын
I think I prefer the M2S and I am gonna get it, I have the Dji Mic Mini and the Dji Mic 2, but I think The M2S has a slight edge over both of those
@BetterCreating6 күн бұрын
The sound is better I think. I do find though that the all in one case for the DJI means I lean towards that for on the go video work with a mirrorless camera.
@agambhasin6 күн бұрын
@ Sure, everyone has their own use case, but as an audio enthusiast and mic collector I choose the one that sounds better to me and works for my voice, I am yet to get the M2S bcz its still not available here in India, and I feel its gonna be a good addition to my collection. I feel the wireless mics especially the budget ones are still evolving and this year we can see a lot of innovation in this area, I am hoping for the best Good Wishes
@Tha-Kelly4 күн бұрын
I purchased the Hollyland M2S Lark Mobile Version for type C and I will test it this weekend :-). Thank you
@BetterCreating3 күн бұрын
Hope you enjoy it! It's great for mobile use - I think I like the DJi for more serious video work on a Mirrorless cam
@pilea.agency3 күн бұрын
I absolutely LOVE your videos Simon. Thanks for having them all and for this real comparaison. I'll buy the M2S
@BetterCreating2 күн бұрын
Thanks so much! Great to read and thanks for being part of the community. Hope you enjoy them!