This is In sha Allah the right way to deal with the matter.
@unutilisateurlambda9998 ай бұрын
the truth in his tongue is clear. one of the great shouyoukh of this time
@nomad22342 ай бұрын
Who is his teacher if i may ask?
@user-lc2cd3wr4zАй бұрын
@@nomad2234 Sheikh Muhammad Al Hassan Al Dedew
@lefourbe___Ай бұрын
He is achaari
@nomad2234Ай бұрын
@@lefourbe___ this imam?
@nomad2234Ай бұрын
@@lefourbe___ thanks for letting me know, if someone didnt learn to our ulemas, i dont listen to him. Like shejkh Albani , ibn Bazz, shejkh Uthaymeen etc.
@laidaouimajid84811 ай бұрын
i love this sheikh
@tuiyu762321 сағат бұрын
Sufi sheikh
@munawarjbaksh7875Ай бұрын
The sheikh is stating aqeedah is in accordance with the Quran and sunnah and not contrary to it. There may be ingnorance in beliefs, which are shirk or kufr. Although we should know that scholars like Imam Ashari and sheikhul Islam ibn Tayyimah may Allah have mercy upon them both, made every effort to prevent the people of their respective times falling into shirk and kufr through incorrect Aqeedah. During Imam Ashari's time, the people were in danger of likening the Creator to His creation, Allah forbid. He did not deny verses of the Quran, and through his efforts, the Iman of many was saved. However, I do believe that it was a matter asigned to that time. And that we should revert back to the approach of the Sahabah may Allah be pleased with them all. And like wise, Sheikh ibn Taymiyyah made every effort to prevent the people of his time denying verses of the Quran. Again, that was an approach needed at his time. Most followers in Aqeedah of both these Imams are ahlus sunnah. But to believe one group denies verses of the quran and the other likens the Creator to his creation is not correct. We are all from Ahlus Sunnah. No doubt there will be a minority that is extreme and in opposition to the other group from among both groups. The sheikh is not referring to the extreme he is referring to the majority from both groups that accept all verses in a manner that befits Allah's majesty and firmly believes there is nothing whatsoever that is comparable to Allah. He is unique and without comparison and perfect and pure and flawless. Yet the approach of boh Imams in Aqeedah is different and appears to be the opposite of the other Imams, on some points, not all. This is why he states it is like in Fiqh, and there may be differences. One group should not be wholesale, making takfir of the other group. Most people have the right Aqeedah. Although it is important that we take knowledge from the learned in matters of aqeedah so that we do not fall into.shirk and kufr. And where there are individuals with wrong beliefs that are close to shirk or kufr, we explain in a good manner what the correct beliefs are. May Allah give us all a life of Islam and death upon Iman.
@hilurgazzali9222Ай бұрын
This is the best comment I’ve seen in the entire comment section.
@Faith-May200511 ай бұрын
Whenever I think I reached a fair understanding in this field ,
@user-ix5hn7nc9l2 ай бұрын
Ma shaa Allah!
@InvestedMinds4 ай бұрын
My favorite shaykh and 3aalim.
@user-ix5hn7nc9l2 ай бұрын
Jazak Allah Khair Shaykh.
@CloseShaveTV Жыл бұрын
Finally ☝🏾🤲🏾
@user-ix5hn7nc9l2 ай бұрын
Bakak Allahu Feek Shaykh 4 speaking out the truth in a confused world!
@UmairAkhlaque11 ай бұрын
سبحان اللہ جزاک اللہ خیرا شیخ. اللہ بطویل العمرک
@omaradamu3845 Жыл бұрын
Jazaak Allah Khairan sheikh for explaining it ❤❤❤❤ in details
@MUSLIMSCORNER-xc1eu Жыл бұрын
ameen wa iyakum Eid mubarak here is the full video kzbin.info/www/bejne/enKahWCIo8mef6c
@onetawab11 ай бұрын
Do you really think it was in detail??
@Visible-jb2ew10 ай бұрын
@@onetawabwhat did you not find clear about it brother?
@mdkhan3928Ай бұрын
🤷🏿♂️🥇🏆🌹
@ali6369 Жыл бұрын
ما شاء الله
@somebody23102 ай бұрын
The second part of his speech has refuted the first part. Just as the Quran and Sunnah refutes innovation.
@MontaneroАй бұрын
I advise you learn more about this sheikh before making a judgement on him. The most renowned scholars and daees refer to him as the modern day source of knowledge and wisdom, he has extremely high credentials.
@foulanedepaname9828Ай бұрын
He said that the nount uhud is a sahaba and like wiping his face with saliva from his friends what more proof do you want from him. @@Montanero
@TheOneRockanАй бұрын
@@foulanedepaname9828proof or shut up
@evzalxheladini12052 ай бұрын
We cannot listen to you as long as you don't testify that God is above the seven heavens,in hi majestic throne!
@MoeedKhan197910 ай бұрын
Absolutely true. To the point ❤❤❤❤
@-.M.--11 ай бұрын
Q: Is it permissible to say that the Companions differed on matters of `Aqidah (creed) such as the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) seeing his Lord on the night of the Mi`raj (Ascension to Heaven) and the dead person hearing the living persons? Do such matters constitute part of the `Aqidah? A: There was no difference or disagreement among the Companions or those following them from among Ahl-ul-Sunnah wal-Jama`ah (those adhering to the Sunnah and the Muslim main body) with regard to the Islamic `Aqidah. This is because they all believed in what is mentioned in the Qur’an and the Prophetic Sunnah. Moreover, they never introduced new practices into the religion. This was the reason for their unity and agreement on the same beliefs and the same method, acting upon Allah’s Saying,”And hold fast, all of you together, to the Rope of All’ah (i.e. this Qur’an), and be not divided among yourselves.”(Surah al-Imran 3:103) One of these beliefs is the belief that the believers will see their Lord on the Day of Resurrection, as all agree on this belief as is proven by the reported proof from the Qur’an and the Prophetic Sunnah. They never differed on such belief. As for the difference and disagreement on the question whether the Prophet (peace be upon him) saw his Lord on the night of the Mi`raj with his physical eyes or not, there is a disagreement on a particular event in this life, not a disagreement on seeing Allah (may He be Exalted) on the Day of Resurrection. The majority of scholars are of the opinion that the Prophet (peace be upon him) saw his Lord with his insight, not with his eyes. This is because when the Prophet (peace be upon him) was asked about this point, he said, “Light, how could I see Him.” Thus, the Prophet (peace be upon him) negated seeing his Lord in this situation out of the light which prevented him from seeing his Lord. Also, scholars unanimously agree that no one can see his Lord in the life of this world, as mentioned in the Prophetic Hadith, where the Prophet (peace be upon him) said, “No one of you shall see his Lord until he dies.” (Related by Muslim). It is worth mentioning that our Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is excluded from this rule, as he saw his Lord, but not in this way. May Allah grant us success! May peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, his family and Companions! Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta’ `Abdul-`Aziz ibn `Abdullah Al Al-Shaykh, `Abdullah ibn Ghudayyan, Salih Al-Fawzan, Bakr Abu Zayd Sheikh.Ul- Islam Ibn Taymiyyah Said “And the intended purpose is that the Sahaabah - may Allaah be pleased with them - did not fight ever, over a principle (qaa’idah) from the principles of Islaam originally. And they did not differ in anything from the qawaa’id of Islaam, not about the Attributes, not about the Qadr, not about the issues of al-Asmaa` and al-Ahkaam (rulings), nor in the issues of the Imaamah.” (Minhaajus-Sunnah (6/336) of Ibn Taymiyyah) ------- 1 . Sheikh. Al- Allamah Saleh-Al Fawzan Question Posed to Shaykh Saalih al Fawzan Concerning the Statement “the Sahabah Differed in Aqeedah” Qustioner : is it Allowed for say That Sahaba differ from the Aspects of Aqeedah ..??? Sheikh Replyed : "Who Said this ..?? It Is Not Mensioned Any where that the sahaba ever differed in Aqeeda Never Whoever claims that they differ in Aspects of Aqeeda He is A LIAR “.
@unknodud13465 ай бұрын
So this confirms what the sheikh said , right?
@-.M.--5 ай бұрын
@@unknodud1346No. The Scholars of sunnah have refuted this astray individual, please beware of him. He rejects clear ahadith of the Messenger of Allāh صلى الله عليه وسلم and claims there is differing in Aqeedah (creedal) matters.
@Ibnyajoh3 ай бұрын
@@-.M.--when n where??
@-.M.--3 ай бұрын
@@Ibnyajoh السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Akhi I don't really want to put doubts into your heart by showing you the speech of this innovator. He has rejected the hadith of the slave girl Jariyah, who the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم attested to her Imaan after she affirmed that Allāh is above he heavens and that he(The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم) is the Messenger of Allāh صلى الله عليه وسلم. I can tell you where to find this but akhi by Allāh I fear misguidance for us and don't want anyone to listen to this mans poison. He does what the innovators of old all did, they reject the Qur'ān and sunnah using philosophy and opinions. May Allāh protect us from misguidance and the callers to misguidance āmeen.
@markward3981Ай бұрын
Everything that people call Aqeedah isn't an obligation to speak upon nor delve into. The prophet salalahu alayhi wa salaam nor the sahaba never used the word Aqeedah in the way scholars later did and the way we use it today. The believe the Quran and followed the messenger salalahu alayhi wa salaam. They used the Quran to understand Quran and asked the prophet salalahu alayhi wa salaam and the other sahaba to understand further .
@abuahmedabdurrahmanalamree6122Ай бұрын
May Allah عز وجل guide Muhammad dedeu to the Siratul Mustaqeem to the Ad Dawah tus salafiyyah the path of the Prophet ﷺ and his Sahabah and leave the Bidah and the Ahlul Bidah Allahumma Ameen
@Dragon_warrior96Ай бұрын
What are you talking about ? Bidah?
@abuahmedabdurrahmanalamree6122Ай бұрын
@@Dragon_warrior96 I'm not sure what your asking he has Ikhwani influences he is a member of The international Union of Muslim scholars and was actually the vice president at one time
@Dragon_warrior96Ай бұрын
@@abuahmedabdurrahmanalamree6122 he is a great sheikh (may Allah (swt) protect him) . I thought you were criticising him.
@muhammadisahlapai3178Ай бұрын
Ameen ameen
@abuahmedabdurrahmanalamree6122Ай бұрын
@@Dragon_warrior96 he has Ikhwani influences like I said I mean he actually said a 5 o'clock shadow as a beard is sufficient for growing the beard
@afrozesidq2 ай бұрын
(Know that there is no god in truth worthy of worship except Allah) this is the Qur'an translation where Allah said get the knowledge of La ilaha illaa Allah ... What do you say about Allah saying to learn about that
@zahin29862 ай бұрын
JazakAllah ❤.
@FAR-in-UK Жыл бұрын
ALLAHU AKBAR KABIRA ☝🏽
@lovemamahouse2 ай бұрын
Allah bless this dear man
@ahmadalbadr2111 ай бұрын
You are the one who is delusional
@team-yx4kh5 ай бұрын
Why?
@belalhossain69694 ай бұрын
SubhanAllah Alhamdulillah mashaAllah Allah Hu Akbar
@egzonosmani1552 ай бұрын
What you said is aqeedah, but those thing are in general and they include details that also is fard to believe, for example peope believe in the last day but they refute that they will see Allah, or they believe in akhirah but they refute the life of barzikha. Don't confuse people because aqeedah is belief, and belief of a muslim should be one.
@syedasadullah7462Ай бұрын
When will people of salafism give duroos of fatawa ibn e taymiya vol 12 where he praises tassawuf and sufism! Even saudia doesn't publish that Jild of fatawa!😅😂
@abuahmedabdurrahmanalamree6122Ай бұрын
IBN Taymiyyah never praised sufiyyah he actually wrote books to warn against them
@muhammedjallow9987Ай бұрын
Seems they have an agenda they are pushing
@TheOneRockanАй бұрын
bring proof or do not speak without knowledge.
@abuahmedabdurrahmanalamree6122Ай бұрын
@@TheOneRockan read كتاب التصوف draw your conclusions from that that will give you your answers
@sriNi-zf1od4 ай бұрын
This Guy doesn't explain how important the practice of Rasulullah Muhammad shalallahu upon rukun iman and Islam is! And how shahabat radhiyallahu anhum interpret and exercise them all accordingly. I Smells bidah
@nazmulslater839810 ай бұрын
You have to avoid shirk and kufr too to enter Jannah.
@Visible-jb2ew10 ай бұрын
That’s included in the shahada “I testify there is no one worthy of worship other than Allah, and I testify that Prophet Muhammad PBUH is his messenger”
@aboeyousfie240910 ай бұрын
@@Visible-jb2ewtrue but what if someone negates the attributes of Allah or says the quran is created. Or says that grave worship is not shirk … shirk kufr occurs when the fundamentals are Not studied firmly . That’s what the people that encourage studying aqeedah mean by .. so people don’t fll in to shirk and kufr while they don’t realise it and are even defending it wa allahu musta’haan
@fulan011229 күн бұрын
@@Visible-jb2ew your right it’s in the Shahadah but how many us know the conditions of it the meaning and the things that nullify it that’s why it’s so important there are pillars of iman pillars of Islam and pillars of the shahdah and then there’s nullifiers that’s why actually studying aqeedah is so important the scholars unanimously agreed that just merely saying it is not beneficial so we have to study it and act upon it
@fulan011229 күн бұрын
@@Visible-jb2ew your right it’s in the Shahadah but how many us know the conditions of it the meaning and the things that nullify it that’s why it’s so important there are pillars of iman pillars of Islam and pillars of the shahdah and then there’s nullifiers that’s why actually studying aqeedah is so important the scholars unanimously agreed that just merely saying it is not beneficial so we have to study it and act upon it
@houseoftawhid Жыл бұрын
What a deviant scholar! May allah guide him
@proudhindustani7 ай бұрын
Why deviant? Can you explain?
@tatsuyakuragi35786 ай бұрын
What are you talking about?
@nbarr3186 ай бұрын
Anybody who is not a dogmatic salafi is a deviant in your eyes
@methree38214 ай бұрын
@@tatsuyakuragi3578These people are a cult from Saudi, who claim to represent the Salaf but are just a cult created by the powers that be to control the ummah and unquestioningly obey the rulers, even when they are blatant foreign agents. The Salafi manhaj is the same as Sunnah. So true Salafi scholars are criticised or put in prison or killed, and that leaves about two and a half scholars, according to them I.e. Those that tow the government line 100%. Naturally, that is not true Islam at all! On the other hand, Sheikh Dedew, like any scholar, is not above criticism, but those guys take matters to the extreme in service of their extreme version of Islam. Unfortunately it gives a bad light on the Salafi manhaj as a whole, as they claim to be Salafi (I.e. following the path of the Sahaba and their followers), and most people do not realise that these guys are just a small cult. Sheikh Dedew says he is Salafi. So one can be wary of these cult guys and ignore them. They have been given wrong info and narrowed Islam into something else.
@hassanbegdouri8734Ай бұрын
Whom or what gives you the right to call him deviant? The day you reach his toes with knowledge and emaan you still have not the right to call him like that.
@ebrahimi442 ай бұрын
How are we supposed to read the subtitles when there are so much cluttered writing allover the translation?😮
@TefaUK10 ай бұрын
Ok, So apparently to his logic, I can believe in the 6 pillars of faith but believe Allah is everywhere, or believe in all the 6 pillars but pray to the graves, NONSENSE.
@FaysalAhmed-zk5ln10 ай бұрын
This is the Aqeedah that jibreel brought to prophet (pbuh).
@TefaUK10 ай бұрын
@@FaysalAhmed-zk5lnno. This is the pillars of Iman, that's not only the belief we are supposed to believe in, we follow the prophet peace be upon him and the companions and their beliefs were more than that hence why their beliefs are documented with proofs in all the Aqeedah books since the 100s, for an example, the prophet said wiping over the khuf is allowed, this was what Allah ordained for us, this was the belief of the prophet and his companions, a sect ,(rafidah) came after and said no its not correct and deviated, so this issue became from the Aqeedah of Ahlu Al Sunnahti wal Jam'aa to differentiate us fr them and their deviancy, and that applies to everything that the scholars had put into the Aqeedah books and how the deviant groups and sects have deviated from the salaf, its not only the 6 pillars of faith and whoever thinks like that i swear by Allah either an ignorant or a deviant himself, go read the books of the salaf and educate yourself, seek knowledge, we will die one day and we will stand infront of Allah. may Allah guide me and you and everyone else.
@nbarr3186 ай бұрын
Praying to graves violates the shahada and the first pillar of Iman, so no Believing Allah is everywhere is wrong but would not make you a kafir
@TefaUK6 ай бұрын
Barak Allahu feek akhi, naa'm you're correct, just to make it clear in sha Allah, I didn't bring both examples to make them equal by any means, but I would like to also let you know that major scholars of the Salaf did say whoever denies that Allah is above his throne is a Kafir, (General Statement) and not a General Takfir on individuals just so people wouldn't misunderstand but barak Allah feek for the heads up brother.@@nbarr318
@Inaya-dt1sv3 ай бұрын
Allah is everywhere in knowledge 😊
@barisansultan27792 ай бұрын
no no wait this is wrong . aqida is not ijtihad shaykh this is wrong
@MuhammedYaseen-ki5pv2 ай бұрын
Naudhubilla
@gardenofedencoltd..30482 ай бұрын
How I wish I could get knowledge from this Shiekh. May Allah bless you Yaa Shiekh
@scave889310 ай бұрын
Is tawheed not part of aqeedah it is not comparable to louga or fiqh
@muhayminrasheed2 ай бұрын
Such nonsense subhanAllah
@user-gm8oc3yx8gАй бұрын
هههههه حلو كتير منك يا شيخ اذا كانت عقائدهم فيها شك كيف تفرض ان الأصول صحيحة بدون شك وهيا من نفس المصدر الروائي 😂
@abdulqaderhasanАй бұрын
انت لم تفهم كلام الشيخ
@hushabyehum4805 Жыл бұрын
Awesome wisdom from ppl of actual knowledge not KZbin debators whose sole joy seems to be to lie and mislead about ppl of knowledge to blame them and women for imagined sins
@falaknaz59672 ай бұрын
Naah.. If aqeedah is corrupt the salah is corrupt, the fasting is corrupt, the iman is corrupt.... The qaadiyaani also affirm all those things he said are they people of Jannah.??
@mvvx3132 ай бұрын
qadiyani don’t affirm these as by rejecting the nabi ﷺ being the khatam al anbiya they are also rejecting the shahada and quran
@thewayoflife..-be4bl2 ай бұрын
This man is not sunn be careful guys He speak of him self
@user-ix5hn7nc9l2 ай бұрын
Shaykh can u tell us about Al-Khilāfah as it is the biggest obligations on Muslims like the schoolars said.
@SAUDI322 ай бұрын
Dajjal
@deadshotff422711 ай бұрын
This is Sufi, your aquida is wrong
@n.d.242911 ай бұрын
Evidence please?
@playyourself11 ай бұрын
Says the guy that can't spell the word.
@-.M.--11 ай бұрын
@@n.d.2429Q: Is it permissible to say that the Companions differed on matters of `Aqidah (creed) such as the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) seeing his Lord on the night of the Mi`raj (Ascension to Heaven) and the dead person hearing the living persons? Do such matters constitute part of the `Aqidah? A: There was no difference or disagreement among the Companions or those following them from among Ahl-ul-Sunnah wal-Jama`ah (those adhering to the Sunnah and the Muslim main body) with regard to the Islamic `Aqidah. This is because they all believed in what is mentioned in the Qur’an and the Prophetic Sunnah. Moreover, they never introduced new practices into the religion. This was the reason for their unity and agreement on the same beliefs and the same method, acting upon Allah’s Saying,”And hold fast, all of you together, to the Rope of All’ah (i.e. this Qur’an), and be not divided among yourselves.”(Surah al-Imran 3:103) One of these beliefs is the belief that the believers will see their Lord on the Day of Resurrection, as all agree on this belief as is proven by the reported proof from the Qur’an and the Prophetic Sunnah. They never differed on such belief. As for the difference and disagreement on the question whether the Prophet (peace be upon him) saw his Lord on the night of the Mi`raj with his physical eyes or not, there is a disagreement on a particular event in this life, not a disagreement on seeing Allah (may He be Exalted) on the Day of Resurrection. The majority of scholars are of the opinion that the Prophet (peace be upon him) saw his Lord with his insight, not with his eyes. This is because when the Prophet (peace be upon him) was asked about this point, he said, “Light, how could I see Him.” Thus, the Prophet (peace be upon him) negated seeing his Lord in this situation out of the light which prevented him from seeing his Lord. Also, scholars unanimously agree that no one can see his Lord in the life of this world, as mentioned in the Prophetic Hadith, where the Prophet (peace be upon him) said, “No one of you shall see his Lord until he dies.” (Related by Muslim). It is worth mentioning that our Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is excluded from this rule, as he saw his Lord, but not in this way. May Allah grant us success! May peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, his family and Companions! Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta’ `Abdul-`Aziz ibn `Abdullah Al Al-Shaykh, `Abdullah ibn Ghudayyan, Salih Al-Fawzan, Bakr Abu Zayd Sheikh.Ul- Islam Ibn Taymiyyah Said “And the intended purpose is that the Sahaabah - may Allaah be pleased with them - did not fight ever, over a principle (qaa’idah) from the principles of Islaam originally. And they did not differ in anything from the qawaa’id of Islaam, not about the Attributes, not about the Qadr, not about the issues of al-Asmaa` and al-Ahkaam (rulings), nor in the issues of the Imaamah.” (Minhaajus-Sunnah (6/336) of Ibn Taymiyyah) ------- 1 . Sheikh. Al- Allamah Saleh-Al Fawzan Question Posed to Shaykh Saalih al Fawzan Concerning the Statement “the Sahabah Differed in Aqeedah” Qustioner : is it Allowed for say That Sahaba differ from the Aspects of Aqeedah ..??? Sheikh Replyed : "Who Said this ..?? It Is Not Mensioned Any where that the sahaba ever differed in Aqeeda Never Whoever claims that they differ in Aspects of Aqeeda He is A LIAR “.
@MichiganTroopers12310 ай бұрын
Your comment is the equivalent of the village idiot slandering an electrical engineer and trying to teach him how electricity works
@Wijk8_up7 ай бұрын
@@playyourselfits an arabic word which is written in another alphabet. When translating that in latin alphabet you can have a wide variety of spellings for a word. As long as if the word is pronounced right in this spelling its fine. You are just a mad little sufi. Go dance in your mosque 🕺🕺🪩🪩
@chadspinnox5662 ай бұрын
This is the shaykh of shaykhs but not known in the west
@cjchris8317Ай бұрын
😂😂😂May Allah guide him and you. He's so wrong about saying Aqeeda is ijtihad.