Doctrine of Estoppel || Section 115, 116, 117|| Indian Evidence Act, 1872

This video is based on Estoppel covered in Chapter 8 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
Case Laws:
1.Gyasri Bai v. Dhansukh Lal 1964
It was held by honorable apex court that if the first two conditions are fulfilled, but the third is not, then there is no scope to invoke the doctrine of Estoppel.
2. The doctrine of Estoppel was developed in the case of Pickard v. Sears (1837) (Lord Denman)
3. The doctrine of promissory estoppels was developed first in Hughes v. Metropolitan Railway Co. 1877.
4. However, the doctrine lost its value and again brought back by Lord Denning in the case of Central London Property Trust Ltd. V. High Trees House Ltd. 1947.
5. The history of doctrine of promissory estoppel in India can be traced back to the case of Ganges Mfg Co. v. Sourajmul 1880, where the Calcutta High Court had held that the doctrine of estoppels was not only limited to the law of evidence, but that a person may be stopped from doing acts or relying on particular arguments or contentions.
Estoppel Against Government
6. Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills v. State of U.P. 1979
It was held that the government was bound by its estoppel and was liable to exempt the appellant from sales tax for a period of 3 years as per the earlier rule framed by it.
Estoppel Against Private Parties
7.Century Spinning and Mfg Co. Ltd. V. Ulhasnagar Municipal Council 1970
It was held by honorable Supreme Court that the concept of promissory estoppel also applies to private individuals or entities.
No Estoppel against Statutes
8. Jatindra Prasad Das v. State of Orissa and others 2011
Orissa high court held that there can be no estoppel against statutes and the statutory provisions and therefore, the said statutory provisions cannot be ignored on the grounds of an earlier administrative decision or precedent.
9. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation 1986
It was held that there can be no estoppels against the constitution of India or against the fundamental rights.
For more videos, click on the links:
Notice under section 3 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882
• Notice || Transfer of ...
Presumptions of Burden of Proof
• Presumptions of Burden...
Presumptions Under Indian Evidence Act, 1872
• Presumptions under Ind...
Presumptions Related to Documents
• Presumptions Related t...
Introduction to Transfer of Property Act
• Transfer of Property A...
Section 5 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882
• Secction 5 TPA 1882 ||...
Injunctions Chapter VII and VIII of Specific Relief Act,1963 and Order 39 Rule 1-5
• Chapter VII & VIII || ...
Section 20 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.
Section 17,18 and 19 of Specific Relief Act, 1963
• #sra #section17specifi...
Section 12, 13, 15 of Specific Relief Act, 1963
• #specificreliefact #sr...
For More videos click on the following links:
Section 188, 120B, 269, 270, 271 IPC, 1860
• #section188 #indianpen...
Section 511 IPC, 1860
• Section 511|| Chapter ...
Criminal Intimidation:
• Criminal Intimidation ...
Receiver
• Receiver || Order 40 |...
Forgery
• Forgery || Chapter XVI...
Criminal Trespass
• Criminal Trespass || S...
Suit by indigent
• Suits by Indigent Pers...
Counterclaim and set off
• #setoff #counterclaim ...
Free Consent & Capacity of Parties
• Free Consent || Capaci...
Burden of Proof
• Burden of Proof || Ind...
Public Nuisance
• Public Nuisance|| IPC ...
Bail under CPC
• Bail Under CrPC || Law...
Theft, Extortion, Robbery and Dacoity
• IPC Lecture || Theft |...
Private Defence
• Private Defence|| IPC ...
Offences Relating to Marriage: Chapter XX
Sections: 493-498
• Lecture on Offences Re...
Cruelty to a Married Woman; Section : 498A
• Lecture on Chapter XXA...
Learn about Defamation:
• #ipc #defamationlaws ...
Please do not forget to like, comment, subscribe, share and support. It matters to me a lot.
Thank You
With
Best Wishes!

[@peulichakraborty6660]

16:34 sec 116 18:25 sec 117

[@varshaupadhyay2543]

Thank u ma'am aapke wajah s bhut bacho ko benefit hua h directly and indirectly......thnx 🙏🙏

[@Sunshine-yk2eg]

Extremely thorough and clear explanation 👌👌Great job ma'am (and especially thank you for the case laws 🙏🙏) bahot jald aapke channel ko 100k+ subscribers milenge. Amazing videos 👌

[@ASHISHSINGH-wk8ss]

Carry on ma'am nice Explaination

[@ArchnaSukhija]

Thanks a lot🙏

[@420420919]

Bahut hi accha explain kiya

[@shambhunaththakur6852]

In short bhut acha thanks

[@satyajsingh]

Nicely explained madam.

[@tushita0907]

very nice xplaination maam...

[@archanabose5555]

Thank you mam

[@AnoopSingh-sc3xi]

Ur are such a great great teacher for us...keep it up🥰

[@sohailkhan1651]

Excellent.

[@vinimalhotra1321]

Amazing explanation

[@JITENDERKUMAR-fs5oy]

Madam, your lecture is good.🙏🙂

[@farazmirza2656]

Thankew so much mam.....ur lectures plays a vital role in my exams 😇😇😇

[@madhuBala-mg4qk]

Good explanation ma'am... thank eww

[@mahaparaahmed]

Mam, please flesh the name of case laws on screen, I think it would be much better. You explain very well.

[@manivasaganchettiar2185]

You vidios very helpfull mam and make more vdeios

[@Shashikumar-gg7fo]

Hi Archana mam, I am from Karnataka (Bangalore) and i am not a student. I have 1 query "Whether rule of estoppel applies against plaintiff by virtue of his attestation on Ex.D-1 which is registered sale deed" . Below is the Example Illustration : 'A' as made agreement (But not Registered sale deed) with 'B' and 'B' Sold the property to 'C' with registration and Sale deed and here 'A' attested his signature as a witness (Knowing or unknowingly) under this sale deed. Now the substantial question of law is that "Whether rule of estoppel applies against 'A' by virtue of his attestation on Ex.D-1 which is registered sale deed" 'C' went for appeel on 'A' asking that Property belongs to 'C' Please let me know the answer

[@mansisapra2371]

Ma'am please make video of section 8 evidence Act

[@sindhavsuresh8560]

Nice mam

[@swarsaha5152]

Mam aap samjhati bahut hi ache se h but thoda please slowly teach kijiye jyada fast nhi isse samaj me ache se ayega please it's my humble request..thank you mam

[@ArchnaSukhija]

Thanks a lot for your valuable suggestion. I will definitely keep in mind for the next time. Thanks and sorry for inconvenience 🙏

[@namratapurohit5420]

Thanku mam

[@bipinbihari8166]

thanku mam

[@sijjalrehman511]

Awesome 👍 hai mam love from Pakistan

[@MAkram-xn7vk]

Decent

[@ArchnaSukhija]

Thanks a lot🙏😇

[@sohailkhan1651]

thanks

[@rahilmechanism90]

Ma'am, whether there is a action or not, Then? Plz...

[@arpitmishra940]

ma'am what is issue estoppel? ?? please reply ma'am

[@mohammedkhajaahmedhussain9876]

Your explanation is easy to understand but I suggest you to make few vedios in English as well

[@shalabharse2924]

Bahut bhater mam,yk bat samj nai ati ki case mi v/s. Mi commisnor ,emperor, pre counel , is prkar mi ,kon vadi, prtevadi in sabd ka MATLAB ki hota, please batliya,

[@ArchnaSukhija]

I m really sorry 🙏 magar mujhe samjh nhi Aaya k aap kya puchhna Chahte hai🙏 plz explain.

[@shalabharse2924]

Mam ydi believe nai karte to ye foreseeable nai ho GA,, danvad

[@bilalabrar4346]

Mam Love from Pakistan ❤

[@shalabharse2924]

Mam hoga ya nai?

[@sujatatyagi720]

Mem thoda hindi me btao hindi medium student h

[@ArchnaSukhija]

Theek hai main next time se dhyan rakhungi.. sorry for inconvenience 🙏

[@abhishekshukla7507]

The wordings of example is quiet incorrect.

[@ArchnaSukhija]

I m really sorry 🙏 but kya aap please bta sakte hai k Maine kya galat use Kiya taki agli Baar se main dhyan rakhu

[@abhishekshukla7507]

"No sorry "🙏🏻. The "example of estoppel is quiet confusing "i.e.,land business between A & B.