Dodge Shadow Acceleration V6 5-Speed

Stock V6 5-Speed 1993 Dodge Shadow. Not bad for 175K.

[@off_mah_lawn2074]

I love those barebones Dodge gauge clusters from the 90s. They still hold up today IMP

[@TBPony]

8 seconds 0 to 60, sounds cool though

[@louisbabycos106]

Not bad for a 1990s car .

[@yuriypodgorniak2728]

Not bad for such an old car!!! I think it's about low 16s

[@RyanUrbanski]

My buddies and I have had relatively stock cars mid fifteens to low 16s. My best in a similar car was 15.7 If i recall correctly.

[@SpectrumRefurb]

mods was done to this 3.0, not a single one runs as good as this one, unless they modded them. Factory they had 141hp and 171 torque. The pbody is lighter than the vans and dynasty that they put this engine in, but the 3.0 was gutless unless you modded it. 3.3/3.8 much better engine ( at least in 92, my 93 dont run good at all )

[@RyanUrbanski]

This car literally stock with an exhaust system because factory one rotted off. I parted this car out to save another, but yeah, this was stock. Ive never owned one that ran bad or was a “slug” (for what they are.) What killed the 3.0’s power were the awful auto transmissions 99 percent came with. Between my shadow 5-speed running 15s/16s and my current spirit with a 3.0 runs mid to high 17s in the 1/4 mile, the difference is very very noticeable to say the least.

[@kunu98]

My 97 ram has a similar layout and dash design lmao

[@Chickenassable]

Sad a Honda v6 mini van is faster

[@RyanUrbanski]

Yeah the 90s wasn’t very “power” plentiful. Fun none the less

[@alexlau5022]

Not a honda van from that time period.. A corvette of today would smoke a corvette of that era but its not a fair comparison.. This little car was a hot little monster back then not many other sport compact could keep up

[@officialjeeff]

Thanks youtube recommendations

[@danielmartin5951]

Man I miss mine 3.0 v6 coupe it was so fun to rip on if u would of stayed in it it would of kept going iv bared mine before