Does Interstellar Suck? - MOVIE FIGHTS!

[@ankurama42]

I hate to sound like a broken record but these guys didn't understand the fucking movie. The daughter was supposed to be the genius who saved everything. It wasn't a co-incidence, it was destined. And this movie made more sense than the whole humanity combined. Of course, this movie is not perfect and has some pacing issues( because you can't fit everything in a 3 hour movie). But these guys are straight up jack-asses and like to simplify everything. You guys just lost credibility and respect from me.

[@ankitsharma-bn2ey]

You just don't know what you are talking about. Do you? The soundtrack was terrible and nothing made sense. This movie sucked ass. Admit it.

[@ankurama42]

You gotta be specific about the film so that i can be able to tear you apart. The soundtrack was reasonable. Don't blame the film if your theatre was terrible.

[@ankitsharma-bn2ey]

What about the 'falling into black hole'? That made sense? Grow up.

[@ankurama42]

First of All. SPOLER ALERT. And my answer is - Ask 'them'. No, but seriously, the fifth dimensional us made sure of the things that were happening in the library(black hole).

[@ankurama42]

RobbyRaccoon That was the point. So they can understand what i was trying to say.

[@JemelOneFive]

*I don't understand* how anyone can say this film *SUCKS!* It was a masterpiece. A brilliant film from start to finish. So good i need to watch it again.

[@Skitz0frenix]

I can understand why if someones brain can't handle all the information and smart dialogue Nolan is throwing at people in his films, which makes it difficult for people to follow the movie... I haven't come across a single Nolan movie I disliked, I love how he can mess up our minds with the stories he portrays in his films. That being said Interstellar is probably his best movie *IN MY OPINION!*

[@TheRealJYPark14]

Kid Kula Inception was beyond better

[@SerenGetter]

I also agree Interstellar is definately flawed, but its far from sucking. It's a good movie, but anyone outright calling it a masterpiece seems outright biased towards Nolan

[@Lostzilla847]

Shut up

[@viktoreriksson8782]

Kid Kula There wasn't that much information to handle really. If you look beyond all the visuals, the story and the characterization is pretty weak.

[@mannyvz17]

Anyone who thinks they're smart because they "get" Christopher Nolan's movies should watch something by Andrei Tarkovsky, Ingmar Bergman or Jean-Luc Godard. I like Christopher Nolan but I'm sick of people acting like they're intellectuals because they watched "Inception" twenty times.

[@TheRealSkeletor]

Now let me know when you figure out Memento. :P Inception is another one targeted at the lowest common denominator (action blockbuster movie fans), not intellectuals.

[@afkarreza7089]

Skeletor Jopko It isn't very difficult to figure out 'Memento'. It is still my favorite Nolan movie but I agree that Tarkovsky, Bergman, and directors like Paul Thomas Anderson get overlooked. There are a lot of great foreign directors out there like Wong Kar Wai, Park Chan Wook, Lars Von Trier, Steve McQueen who also make very complex films. Not just scientifically but more on a human level.

[@TheRealSkeletor]

Afkar Reza Oh really? Then answer me this one question: Was "Teddy" the real John G?

[@mannyvz17]

Skeletor Jopko I haven't seen Memento in a long time, but I don't remember it being too hard to follow. I really liked it though.

[@TheRealSkeletor]

***** I agree, that's what I like about it also. Riddle me this, though: If "Teddy" wasn't John G, why did Leonard shoot him?

[@NavasGonzalo]

It can have its flaws, but suck? Interstellar SUCK?? come on... wtf

[@captainhowlerwilson508]

+Gonzalo Navas It's not a bad movie. It just wasn't great and it had a lot of flaws that just made everything so confusing. This movie was very, very hard to love. Why can't you understand me when I say that? I don't hate this movie.

[@Richie7788]

it really sucks

[@leemcqueen500]

He said it's crazy that people can say it suck's not that they don't love it.

[@WoodBlock707]

Can say the samething about BvS.

[@kristianvukajlovic6789]

Well it's a problem to put it in rank with BvS but it's not one of top 50 movies as according to people (IMDB)

[@gulinp1]

INterstellar is like 5000000000000 times better then any Marvel movie that SJ guys are hyping every movie fight

[@jonnemesis11]

Interstellar is a piece of shit that only childish Nolan fanboys would think its good.

[@gulinp1]

unknown unknown pg 13 explosion galore with no storyline = avengers , they look like michael bay made them

[@jonnemesis11]

Petar Gulin Self-indulgent parody of 2001 = Interstellar

[@gulinp1]

unknown unknown transformers without Optimus = av(r)engers

[@jonnemesis11]

Petar Gulin Kubrick without talent = Nolan

[@hollyroxy25]

My favorite directors today are David Fincher, Quentin Tarantino, Martin Scorsese, & Christopher Nolan.

[@snuffmeister6720]

my favourite fruit is orange, apple, banana and orange.

[@hollyroxy25]

snuff meister okay.....lol

[@suttree3233]

+Holly Roxy 1. Fincher 2.Edgar Wright 3. Stanley Kubrick 4. Lynne Ramsay

[@hollyroxy25]

Declan franks yea I would put kubrick in my top of all time but I was picking from directors that are still alive today

[@jameslisle7775]

Spielberg,Scorsese,Nolan and Terrintino.

[@Fortstorm]

I didn't like The Godfather. Do you know what that means? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

[@MADguyfps]

I hated Citizen Kane. Fucking crucify me.

[@seanmcauliffe6687]

Trolls Bane I have never seen it but i seem to be able to feel the overatedness of it in the air when its talked about.

[@unnamednewbie13]

wineandforgive Arguable. Much of its hype is backed by people who haven't actually seen it (or have the barest memory of anything beyond the Rosebud scene), just so they can pretend to be erudite. This doesn't mean it's not good, but it is, along with numerous other films, overrated on a regular basis.

[@Mecky3455656]

the word overrated is overrated and overused...

[@unnamednewbie13]

Suschko Sushi We use the word "overrated" because we don't want to type "the actual quality of this movie tends to be exaggerated by its admirers." If you don't like it and want to be unique, go invent a language based on musical pops and whistles.

[@lukes_1675]

Interstellar was a great movie, in fact likely my favorite of all time, but in this Movie Fights episode, nobody knew what the real plot was. "Love" never had any power. Throughout the movie, the real point was that love is a habit that binds humans. It was a predictable program, not a mystical force. Also, every single bit of the science is pretty accurate to an admirable point. These points both culminate in the ending. The ending wasn't about the power of love saving humanity, it was about how Coop had always just been the decoding agent for a civilization living in a higher dimensional plane, and that regardless of what may happen, people don't let go of love. It's a human pattern that makes us what we are.

[@KozueMegami]

What a complete load of crap lol

[@W97Jamie]

@@KozueMegamiwhat an amazing retort, your name suits you.

[@KozueMegami]

@W97Jamie that name is there to expose uneducated people like yourself, or else you wouldn't have remarked on that way. You truly are the wise man, lol

[@MorroWolf]

Wow you guys really took the piss out of interstellar, you were blowing small flaws in the movie that you could literally do for just about any film. The story was powerful, the setup was necessary to put the main conflict of the movie in place and make it personal for the main character. Coop leaving was painful on the one hand because he is a single father he lost his wife all he has are his kids, his daughter and son both look up to him. On the other hand his talents are being wasted being a farmer he had dreams of going into space that now have the potential to be realized he feels a little guilty over his excitement of this dream being reborn and he knows its just a matter of time before the corn dies and humanity ends. His daughter represents his intellectual nature and greatest aspirations, his son represents a person who resigned to heading towards ruin, he is solid and stoic and capable but doesnt expect to survive. This is also why his daughter and son become estranged he reminds her of how her father was before he left. The diacritical opposition of the children highlights the duality of Coops character and reiterate the theme of parents being the ghosts of their childrens future. All the space stuff is actually very well researched gravity manipulates time, the way the astronaughts sleep is actually based of some very new research about inducing theraputic hypothermia coming out of NASA just recently. The only real creative leap was what happens inside a black whole which is impossible to know because the black whole has so much gravity nothing can escape it. This idea of inter dimensional time/gravity manipulation by future humans while seemingly convenient to the plot is actually coherent with the intuitive leaps Nolan takes based on modern understandings of astrophysics. The only real problem the plot has is the one you always have with time travel which is the whole infinite loop of going to the past to do something so that circumstances eventually allow you to go into the past so on. Humans eventually make it to the place where they can move to a higher dimensional plain outside of time and there for can do all kinds of wizardry but to quote Arthur C. Clark "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." The ambition of this movie seems to just be lost on people who dont have contemporary understanding of the universe which is something Nolan was interested in exploring in this film. He does a lot of research and folds that into the movie and it was successful in inception and its successful in interstellar, a lot of people didnt like inception either because of its discussion of advanced philosophical concepts and neurology went right over peoples heads. The main characters were well thought out, matt damon aside everyone did a pretty good job, I really hated matt damon in the movie but he kind of nailed the pandorum character, he wasnt pleasant to watch as the rest of the movie was but that doesnt necessarily mean he didnt do the job he was supposed to do. I'm not sure what prevented you guys from connecting with Coop and the conflict he felt with leaving his children behind which became increasingly more painful as he realized he missed out on their entire lives and would never make it back to them but this was well represented on screen. I especially loved the relationship developing between Coop and Tars who was amazing comic relief. The whole movie worked the only problem I had with it was how basic the planets were, theres a lot of cool things we've observed just in our own solar system like the metal snow on venus or 200 mile high geysers on europa that shoot water into space or the thick atmosphere on titan that could literally allow you to double jump. However its possible going to fantastical with the planets would take away from the central aspects of the movie which is ultimately human.

[@matiiijas]

Yeah... so it seems that there are plenty of people who understand the movie much better than all those screen junkies guys... I'm not surprised that this movie doesn't impress those who love simple and not science based plots but instead of talking bed things about the movie they shoud ask somebody to explain it to them.

[@UnderearthEDO]

With you basically 100%. Too many people think certain areas are loopholes and the such when they are in fact very well researched. Also the whole idea behind Matt Damon was to show what happens to people when they are isolated for so long (i.e. the "best" of mankind becoming a selfish bastard). This is all to demonstrate the pointlessness of the movies "plan b" which is always talked about as a necessary evil for humanity to survive. With Anne Hathaway at the end we see her at the very first stages of becoming the new Matt Damon and how hopeless it all is. Interstellar is in my top 3 movies this year. Truly brilliant but understandably not for everyone.

[@Shige2213]

Its todays culture, if something goes mainstream there are always a small amount of people that automatically go against it not because its bad but because its hyped and mainstream, sadly these people are the loudest on the internet. annoying fucks

[@MorroWolf]

People just dont know how to judge quality, im not such a huge movie buff that I get everything going on technique wise and how it is working vs how its intended or should be working but I think this is a fine piece of film though I wont go to bat for it as hard as I would for some other types of media. To quote(roughly) David Hume, statements of sentiment are not sufficient to make pronouncements of truth. Stupid people think opinions in themselves are something to value, they have to be vetted first.

[@vkojouharov]

I'm so saddened that they think the movie didn't make sense. Ignoring the ending where Cooper 'traditionally' should have been ripped apart by tidal forces (though the actual ending could work, we don't know), everything else was dumbed down very little, yet still presented great. The whole presentation on time dilation (the core of the story itself) was great and very consistent.

[@thatgermandude6076]

The reason why Interstellar gets so much hate is because of the last 20 minutes and how weird it was. But that's the point that Nolan tried to get across. No one knows what happens when you go into black holes or wormholes (which do exist). His interpretation might seem silly but it's just as silly as anyone else's theory, because no one knows what really happens. Plus it's a science fiction movie.

[@gustavusthoren7112]

Halleluja! Exactly.

[@jameslisle7775]

Great point. And a great one over the cukoos nest profile picture.

[@IamE0N]

Except people do know what happens when you enter a black hole (as much as we know they exist). The event horizon doesn't turn into a magic library.

[@CptReynoldsStuntDble]

This is wrong. We know exactly what happens to things as they approach a black hole, "spaghettiffication" look it up.

[@KallenW]

@@CptReynoldsStuntDble after reading Kip Thorne's book on the black hole, he said that originally he would've not allowed Cooper to live when he entered the singularity, due to "spaghettification" but he said there were the existence of gentle singularities in which Cooper may have been able to survive entering. Also, according to Thorne, he never actually entered the singularity, cus the tesseract was placed just under the surface of the singularity, so copper fell into the tesseract, and then was transported to Murph's bedroom through the bulk (the higher dimensions that's theorised by superstring theory) where he was able to interact with her. It is super speculative tbh, but it's not like completely forbid by the laws of relativity.

[@TylerWardhaha]

Alright... KICK THOSE PEOPLE THAT TURN EVERYTHING INTO A SHOUTING MATCH OFF THE SHOW. We don't like it.

[@hysteria347]

In other words keep Mundy off the show.

[@TylerWardhaha]

+Shane Mundy, actually toned himself down finally. If it hadn't been for Rodger starting the yelling matchs, I think Mundy would have been alright.

[@TheLunarAssassin]

Speak for yourself man. I want a shouting match every week.

[@TylerWardhaha]

Well brooks. I'm not sure what to say about that that. Maybe we can go half and half? You know one show can have just Mundy and the other dude, and the next can be more normal people.

[@redav415]

It isn't the Mundy's yelling that bugs me most, it's that he can't shut up so others can talk--he even won't stop once the winner is decided, and they try to move on to the next topic. I want clever, insightful, & passionate discussion, but also professional. They need to have only one mic on at a time, and give the moderator power to switch.

[@aidanmcmanus7478]

Best director currently working? Michael Bay. The transformers movies are so innovative and they have such a complex plot. Just kidding, transformers is a mass cliche and explosion, even if turtles was good Michael bay sucks.

[@HYEOL]

There are actually people out there that really think that about M.Bay Any sufficiently advanced troll is indistinguishable from a genuine kook.

[@Afineaddition]

I spit my drink out reading your comment. Great job!

[@HYEOL]

Fred FHRITP Guy haha, i think he is actually innovative.... in his own ****** way. But the "complex plot" xD

[@aidanmcmanus7478]

t1gertank19 Thank you, I wanted to see the reactions people had.

[@aidanmcmanus7478]

Fred FHRITP Guy I guess you are right. :)

[@franceskototi82]

Cant take seriously opinions on interstellar from guys who have an erection over fast and furios,but everyone has their opinions and i respect that

[@mikeyflaherty6628]

Hahahaha! John mctiernan best director working today??! He hasn't made a move for 13 fucking years! Btw interstellar is a masterpiece!

[@calvincandie9345]

+Mikey F I could not beleived he picked him. Does he mean to say that he is a better director than Martin Scorsese? David Fincher?!

[@longliverocknroll5]

+Mikey F Not to mention that one of the last films he directed, Rollerball, was one of the worst remakes of all time. McTiernan easily has more bad films than good films.

[@calvincandie9345]

longliverocknroll5 despite his good films being REALLY good films. I feel like there is no middle groind with him, he is either really good or really bad

[@TheGrapeinc]

+Mikey F No it's not.

[@McG00f]

+Mikey F Interstellar is a mediocre film about space with a family crisis thrown in there for some reason

[@allanmcbean8001]

Did Nick even watch Interstellar??

[@nori9686]

How can you don't even talk about Fincher? Nolan is very competent, BUT is it even necessary a debate to decide if Nolan has ever made something superior to Gone Girl or Seven? TDK is an amazing movie with an unforgettable performance by Heath Ledger, unequal to any other superhero movie; Inception was original and entertaining for the masses, but c'mon, you know Fincher is way better! His movies have no flaws! And since when is "number of people who are pulled in into a theater" a criteria for better directing?? If it is then you should have chosen the ridiculous Michael Bay! (no need to comment the english, I already know it needs work)

[@tylertaing8325]

Yeeee

[@umangabhatta6518]

the prestige and memnto and direction is more about influencing post batman even marvel movies have become darker skyfall dirctor himslf told he was inflenced by tdk for skyfall

[@ExNyarlathotep]

umanga bhatta Direction has nothing to do about influencing anything. It about directing where a movie's story, characters etc move towards. Are you on bath salts?

[@umangabhatta6518]

ExNyarlathotep i was just talking about influence of nolan in present time is much more superior just like cameron revolutionized with avtar ...from movies to videogames have been effected by nolan's dak prospctus;his movies are long term compared to other's;even if u may nt like interstallar it is going to be a point of discussion with ur friends

[@umangabhatta6518]

ExNyarlathotep and coming back to movies superior to fencher: prestige(no1 in my all time favourite) followed by memto(no 10 in my all favourite) if u watch above video closely they mention about prestige and memnto bettr than inception and tdk

[@crowrebirth]

You know, I love when filmmakers break 'rules' and fucking ace it. Christopher Nolan keeps doing it. The biggest problem with interstellar was the underdeveloped character Tom. But I actually LOVE how they did his character. Sometimes love is lost and people lose faith. I just assumed that Tom died, having been obviously at odds with Cooper (I love that they don't say his first name too, and I'm honestly not being sarcastic. Btw, his name is Joseph). Tom says "dad didn't raise me, grampa did and he's buried out back with mom and Jessie." I assumed he died before Cooper made it out of the tesseract. And I didn't mind that they didn't mention him. Despite these small "infractions," I think this movie was a masterpiece. And I think these imperfections complete its perfection. I didn't go into it with any expectations, and I was blown away. This film was very moving and I've actually found myself addicted. I'm sick of people treating movies like products. They're pieces of art. Made to escape the boundaries we know. Made to be imperfect. Everyone needs to just throw away their cares and soak it in for what it is; a touching masterpiece, if you're open to it. You HAVE to try to dislike it to dislike it. Or you have to simply have a sort of superiority complex. Making a film is, in itself, impressive. It's not easy. Writing and conceptualizing are not simple tasks. They deserve some respect and recognition.

[@ferdia748]

Every single thing that Nick said didn't make sense was explained in the movie....

[@DonColonel]

Finaly, Been waiting for like 3 minutes. Just what the doc ordered. Please include Hal next time

[@Obeseblackman27]

Love your work Stelio Kontos

[@tannerhill6809]

STELIOOO. STELIO KONTOS STELLIOOO

[@nvrslps]

Roger's defense of Interstellar was horrible because it was grounded in the visuals and the idea but not the actual story. I can't think of anyone other than pretentious twats who would watch something if you describe the it the way he did lol.

[@nvrslps]

Also, I find it interesting how everyone tries to make Nick "the asshole" even though he mostly yells when people cut him off. Also, he was the only one to call Scott's racist casting in his upcoming movie.

[@seanmcauliffe6687]

Victor Ware His casting was not racist. As an artist he has the ability to tell any story the way he wants. The movie looks damn good and part of the reason i want to see it is because of Bale. You demanding that the casting is bad because of the race of an actor make you the racist one not him.

[@samsaoul1432]

Sean McAuliffe "NO, UR RASIST!!1" Sorry kiddo, Ware's right. Set in Egypt? Make them EGYPTIANS/people who can freaking pass as Egyptians.

[@nvrslps]

Sean McAuliffe Unless you're paying me, get off my nuts. I'm not here to educate your obviously ignorant ass. So either show me the money or stop fucking mentioning me. That goes for you and your troll bot.

[@pleasemorefunny]

That's the best Interstellar synopsis! A movie about a girl whose dad flies into a black hole and through the power of love travels back in time to his daughters bedroom to haunt an old wristwatch so that it taps out secrets to the universe in Morse code.

[@sunslayer553]

You guys should do a fight where you GIVE each of the guests something to defend and let them go at it. In my opinion make them defend something bad... Example: Prove your franchise is better: Guest 1: Defend the Transformers franchise Guest 2: Defend The Fast and The Furious franchise Guest 3: Defend the Saw franchise

[@ViperT17]

This is pathetic guys. The least you could do is get some intelligent movie watchers around the table for this argument. In my opinion, Interstellar is, hands down, Nolan's best movie. Your problems with the movie were that -You don't understand theoretical physics. -If a director makes you infer anything you turn your brain off and call it a plot hole. You should bring the same guys back to review a movie like Birdman. They'd probably think it's terrible. Also, as for the premise: The "Power of Love" was not what brought him back; that was his motivation. Extreme gravity bending space/time is what brought him back. Despite Star Trek, the human race actually still DOESNT know what will happen if we enter a black hole and could survive it. Casey Afleck was not a "psychopath." He was an uneducated fear driven human. If we went back to a medieval era movie, we wouldn't say "Why are they going to cut that guy's leg off? All he has is a rash." NO we wouldn't! Why? Because they weren't exposed to the same education that all of you were. If you caught on at the beginning, the education system in that world is INCREDIBLY fucked. They breed uneducated, fear driven people to blindly work to preserve the human race. He was drawing parallels between the two children to emphasize the effect of Cooper not being there. These people are morons. They literally just take everything the characters say on their word. There's this concept in good movies that not all characters are spoon feeding you the plot at all times. In a good movie characters can be stupid, irrational, and lie! And many many more. Because that's how humans work, see? I didn't hear a SINGLE word about form. How about the AMAZING scene where they come back from the water planet and Cooper is watching the videos of his children losing faith in him and eventually giving up on him as they grow old? How they showed the video for about 2 seconds and then held on Cooper for the REST OF THE VIDEOS. Bold move by Nolan and the editor, but goddamn that scene was worthy of the term masterful. My point is. Get these pseudo-intellectual movie zombies out of your show. Give us someone that will show us something new about the movie. Or give us insight that we wouldn't have had otherwise. Go watch some Every Frame a Painting on youtube and find out how little you actually know about film form.

[@jack0lantern93]

Jeez that Interstellar fight was just a 3 on 1 fight there, not very fair and not great arguments either.

[@zerothefaceless4888]

I have no doubt about it. Interstellar is a movie that is either loved or hated. From the moment it ended i knew there will be people who will dislike it. Personally i really liked it and i know that Nolan did his best. Of course as every movie it has flaws, there were better and worse moments, but still it was great. At the same time i understand people who dislike it, and i know there are many.

[@Koinoyokan01]

I've never been so confused about how I felt about a movie in my life. Towards the end, I felt upset that he went in the direction he did, and I felt like certain things were missed throughout the whole movie, so I want to think I didn't like it. BUT, I don't think I've ever wanted to see a movie again as bad I wanted to see this one. I literally wanted to step into another theater and watch it again right away. It's inexplicable how I can criticize a movie so much, but at the same time I can't wait to see it again.

[@jasonbrown4526]

Charles Pulman Hate the ending, but the rest of the movie was pretty interesting. I would watch it again.

[@ShogunOrta]

Okay, about the Blackhole Library thing at the end, I think the one guy who is defending it is correct that it made logical sense in the movie. Buuuuuuut, the reason why it was corny as hell for audiences is because those events are the last thing you would expect for a movie that is trying to be as REALISTIC as possible. I mean, yeah, those events could happen, but as soon as he ejected from the ship into the blackhole...they lost me. Everything I've ever known about a blackhole told me this guy is dead in 2 seconds. So that's the problem, not that the end wasn't built up, but because it was too corny. Sure, I'll even go with the tesseract and the future humans helping him, but it was too cheesy.

[@jasonbrown4526]

The ending of the movie felt very forced.

[@ShogunOrta]

Agreed. My friends and I figured out that most of the later events happened the way they did because it was all predicated on the notion that only Murph could solve the equations that Coope sent her through the blackhole. You know like she was an Einstein and hence could be the only one out of all of NASA to figure it out. This, I would be okay with it if they properly built her up to be that. Yes, in the beginning the teachers were complaining that she was too smart and her dad thought so too. But she herself didn't do or say anything that made me think Wow that girl is a genius. All the teachers' complaints could have been about any number of the millions of above average smart kids in the world at that time. But there was nothing that made me think that she was THAT smart ever and therefore destined to be the one whom this whole movie would secretly revolve around. So yes, the ending was forced and I would accepted it more if they had built it up properly, but I would have liked a better ending than Cooper finding a library inside a blackhole. Coughs- jumping the shark - coughs! Sorry, I've got a head cold.

[@hello-fo5yg]

No one knows anything about what "inside of a black hole" The ending made perfect sense, if you don't get it look it up.

[@ShogunOrta]

It's not about not understanding it. I get it. But it just felt cheesy. Which is why this movie is ranking in the 70s on rottentomatoe.com

[@shmooveyea]

How do you know what would happen in a black hole? No one knows, thats the point, Nolan could do whatever he wanted in there

[@ctr1502]

calling out a lot of the required story elements like nick mundy does can be done on any film realistically. interstellar was a good film. it was damn imaginative, maybe even above inception. there's a lot they've missed I think.

[@efenebilcanik2431]

I was a HUGE SCREEN JUNKİES FAN. But when Dan said ''Interstellar cannot pass logic test'' i understood that Screen Junkies is full of action-lover nerd marvel fans. I enjoy MARVEL films but i forgot them after a week or two. I can re-watch them but just for fun. (except that GotG which was GREAT). Interstellar had very coherent story, logic (SCREW YOU DAN MURRELL, COME ON DUDE, there wasn't any plotholes, nor logic problems) performances were great especially Matthew McConaughey, VFX were perfect, plot was great... For me, it is a true FLAWLESS MOVIE

[@TomaszWota]

It sure as hell wasn't flawless. Multiple problems can be pointed out, and the whole plot is based on a time paradox. ;) It was good, even thought it felt like drawn out at times, and yet, didn't feel anywhere near 2h45 long. ;)

[@alprudhomme1]

Great comment. I don't know if it's possible to be flawless, but Interstellar is pretty darn close to that.

[@doubleoscar773]

The only plot "problem" that comes to mind is with Casey Affleck and Jessica Chastain. She burns his corn and gets the wrist watch, then when Casey Affleck comes back and is super pissed, she just hugs him and problem solved.

[@doubleoscar773]

Although since it wasn't a major plot point in the movie, i don't mark down the movie at all

[@TheNugettinage]

I find it extremely amusing that you think that calling someone a nerd or a marvel fan is an insult.

[@ProfessionalBob]

I agree with most of Spencer's points but I don't think they make it a bad movie. For me, the biggest problem with it was that the score was too loud in many parts. Nick just doesn't seem to understand the logic behind the movie, none of his arguments against it's continuity actually make sense. What if young Murph wasn't really clever and she didn't figure it all out? It was Cooper who was sending her the signals, he knows how clever his own daughter is... Also, there's definitely an element of 'what if?' as we can see how desperate Cooper was for her to figure it out, the movie simply went down the route where she actually DOES figure it out. You can't criticise a film based on what could have theoretically happened. In Inception, what if Cilian Murphy's character had figured out what they were trying to do before they did it? There was a disease which was killing off crops and corn was one of the few things they had left, older Murph burnt the corn fields to get her brother to leave because all of the dust was killing his family's lungs. He was angry at her (I don't think he ever looked like a raging psychopath) because she burned his fucking livelihood... Matt Damon made the worst performance of his life? I agree that he didn't really need to be in the film because it was distracting, but that was the only problem with his character, I didn't see anything wrong with his acting.

[@jackwald4394]

God i would love to join this Interstellar argument. One of my favorite films of all times

[@markozoric8063]

Here we go: I thought it was a bad Nolan film. Average on its own, but bad coming from Nolan. There you go, argument started.

[@jackwald4394]

Marko Zoric Yes, here we go! I partially agree with that. It wasn't Nolans best film, but in my opinion, it's one of the best. Doesn't match up to The Dark Knight, maybe Inception. But i think what really sets it apart is that it has such a deep emotional pull. Nolan brings us so far away from earth, and doesn't hold back from imagining what can happen within the laws of physics. But he also does such a great job of keeping it very human, and keeping us feeling so intimately connected to the characters. And just wanna throw it in there that I absolutely hate the fat guys arguments. He's ripping on it because he didn't fully understand it. I could explain any one of his "plot holes"

[@markozoric8063]

Jack Wald Well Nick said it himself that he is a dummy, but he did make a valid point about Matt Damon. My biggest problem with this film is that it forces that love is the key to everything, love is la la la. Characters are also so selfish about their love. Anne Hathaway is willing to sacrifice entire human race so she can see the one she loves. Cooper, while on that frozen planet, decides that he's going back to Earth and would rather die in the dirt with his daughter than try to save mankind. It's as if no one is willing to sacrifice himself for this mission. Sure Cooper does that after that dock explodes, but we know he's not going to die. The ending is bullshit as well. After all that he goes back to his daughter and she basically tells him to fuck off and go away. The film should've ended with that bright light after the tesseract collapses. Also "I need to hurry up" scene inside the tesseract makes no sense, because he has all the time in the world inside there. So yea. Didn't like it. It was made for mass audience. It doesn't let us conclude anything but rather chooses to spoon feed everything to us. Nothing is smart about this film, and it's very predicable.

[@jackwald4394]

"Nick said it himself that he is a dummy." There's one thing I agree with him on lol. And I didn't think Matt Damon was as terrible as he seems to think he was. He was bad by Matt Damon standards, and it's fair to say that having a big name actor in that role kind of distracted from the film. But I don't think that's enough to ruin the movie. As for love, Anne Hathaways speech (love it or hate it) was about that. That we still experience love even when it has no biological purpose. Whether there was something to that, or she just said it because she was so bogged down by love, we don't know. But it's something to think about. Also, I think that could be seen as a moral to the story. Maybe Nolan's trying to illustrate that love can cause us to think illogically and make bad choices. Murph didn't tell him to fuck off, she said "no parent should have to watch their child die," and sent him off to once again save humanity. And how can you say it was predictable? Did you expect him to end up in a maze of Murph's bookshelf? If so, I'm impressed. And look at other great films like Pulp Fiction, Schindler's List, Star Wars, etc. (just a few randoms pulled off of IMDB's top 250). These all clearly explain what happens, but still have lessons to be learned. I think Interstellar definitely does have lessons to be learned about love and human nature. The only reason your argument can be made is because you're comparing it to other Nolan films like Inception, Memento, The Prestige, etc. Even compared to those, Interstellar still has a reasonably ambiguous ending and allows us to conclude and interpret for ourselves. We aren't really sure what happens when Cooper goes to join Anne Hathaway or if humanity ever makes it there. And we can definitely still ponder about a deeper meaning.

[@doubleoscar773]

I hate how everyone in the comments assumes that anyone who enjoys and defends the film is a "nolanite." Personally, I loved it, Solid 9/10.

[@eterirongen4939]

the main problem with interstellar, its that if you make a movie about love, or more to the point a dramatic separation between people, WHY the reunion was so badly written? First you have the reunion between the father and the little girl (not so little), so badly done, and then she says to hem that there is a woman that could need hem, and the movie ends... why didn't they made the end the reunion of Cooper and Amelia, it would suffice the look on her face, when she sees hem from 1 mile away, but NOOOO they end it just before, a movie about love that didn't give any finality to love, just a broken promise and a run for the hangar. Also the lack of explication was unforgivable, they explain why he and tars needed to detach, but they didn't explain why the earth couldn't sustain plants, or why only corn could be planted, especially since corn its not a simple plant, and to be honest, any eradication or this earth plant life, would eradicate us a lot sooner, and I don't mean because lack of nourishment. PS: why they dint need engineers??????? that's stupid.

[@najeefareed8890]

people like Nolan movies because they are told they are supposed to

[@JohnSpawn1]

No. People like his films because they're good. That's it.

[@najeefareed8890]

Tom Waits good is relative.

[@JohnSpawn1]

Najee Fareed Sure it is. But considering that his films are both highly acclaimed AND hugely popular seems to indicate that they are good.

[@najeefareed8890]

Tom Waits not to say he has never made a good film. He is just overrated.

[@JohnSpawn1]

Najee Fareed He might be, yes. Still hink he's one of the finest directors out there, though.

[@DerronOfCairon]

I don't know who the big guy's name is, but the fact that LOTR has a true, satisfactory ending, not rushed, but completely acted out, that makes it the best.

[@RitchieChavez]

Tarantino > Nolan. Nothing can ever top Pulp Fiction.

[@zachheller6681]

Hard to say. They make completely different films.

[@RitchieChavez]

Zach Heller True, and I have the utmost respect for Nolan, it's just that I believe that Tarantino redefined cinema, and the guy can write the fuck out of a screenplay.

[@imranhq13]

The Dark Knight easily can

[@TheControversialToon]

Ritchie Chavez The Dark Knight and Memento shit on Pulp Fiction, sorry :(

[@TheControversialToon]

***** Well, at the end is up to opinions.

[@fosterfied9007]

Honestly i thought Interstellar was a good film, it's just that people just want to see fun movies, no one really cares for a "story" anymore, just visuals and shit. It is one of Nolan's best, wayyy better than that overhyped "Gravity" film, and it honestly put the science fiction genre into a different limelight honestly.

[@nestorb2pj3]

+Fosterfied I agree except from the part that its one of Nolans best. Memento , Prestige , Inception and Dark Knight are way better

[@fosterfied9007]

+la antarctica Yeah you're right lol. But honestly still this was a pretty good movie and honestly they can blame it on the audience why movies rarely have intriguing stories anymore.

[@nestorb2pj3]

I totally agree

[@fosterfied9007]

+la antarctica lol thank you!!! Did you see that debate they had with if Jurassic world was a failure or a good film?

[@nestorb2pj3]

+Fosterfied nah, but ill probably check it out at some point. Im new to this whole MovieFights and im so excited about this . Plus i really like to see more opinions on movies i love and hate !

[@jaycievictory8461]

Roger seemed so happy in this video. Whether he was chilled out and smiling or screaming and laughing. And the rivalry between him and Nick seemed much more friendly. I like this Roger and Nick. Let's have them back, please :)

[@MosesRides]

Interstellar was awesome

[@sid1619]

Fast and the furious is fun and interstellar sucks??? Lol.. Wats wrong with you guys??

[@johnhasaguitar]

Before I saw Interstellar I didn't know who the fuck Christopher Nolan was. It was a name I've heard before, but I couldn't list a single movie he'd made. In fact if you had asked me, I'd probably think he was a baseball player. After I saw this movie and was completely blown away, I started looking around on KZbin and found that apparently anyone who likes Interstellar only likes it because they are a "Nolan fanboy". For fucks sake, am I the only person who watches movies because they look like they have an interesting plot, and not who stars in or directs it?

[@fabianbarrera8266]

Wow Nick saying that Nolan dosent care about his actors is just blind ranting, everything he says is just random with no true meaning or support to back it up. All the actors that have worked with Nolan love working with him because he gives the actors the duty of actually acting. By that I mean that for many shots, he only does one take, and goes on to the next scene which shows the actors how good they actually are, giving them the confidence to do their best, basically giving them a relaxed enviroment. Great debate show, but lack of balance between unbiased and biased people, but still great at its core.

[@vinchisters]

Interstellar is amazing.

[@Gaafar93]

Best Director is David Fincher no arguement.

[@VMG3001]

Paul Thomas Anderson is REALLY overrated David fincher is REALLY underrated but I'm gonna say Quentin Tarantino

[@Gaafar93]

They're all great, and they all surpass the directors they named. They're just picking their favorites. Fincher has managed to get everyone into the cinema with Gone Girl. PTA may not be as successful for the "whole" audience but his movies are up there with the greats. I agree about Quentin. He does great original movies and they are plenty of fun, but in the end for me its David Fincher.

[@walkieer]

People who didn't like this movie. Feel free to shoot your arguments; I'm looking forward for actual valid points. The only major problem I had was the very end where Cooper magically got out of the blackhole, transported to Saturn and got saved in time. Also you can't objectively judge a story outside it's logic really.

[@Barrobroadcastmaster]

I thought Interstellar sucked, made no sense and was forced. The scenes where he finally reaches the "5th dimension" or whatever were just complete bullshit. I did not like this movie, that is my opinion.

[@Barrobroadcastmaster]

***** Just because it's interesting sci-fi doesn't mean it can't be bullshit. It is bullshit and I don't find it very interesting. You're free to enjoy it if you want, I didn't.

[@dpotter2113]

Nick Mundy apparently watched the movie while also surfing the internet and juggling, because he didn't understand half the things that were very well explained in the film.

[@TheCoffeeNut711]

I liked the film. The "Love transcends space and time" part made me cringe though.

[@racewiththefalcons1]

Short answer = yes. Long answer = fuck yes.

[@vilchico]

in the world of arts nobody is right, it's just taste.

[@shanemccauley8009]

That's blatantly untrue, there are bad movies, and there are good movies. You're relative experiences of movies can change due to taste, you can like an objectively bad movie, or dislike a great movie, and that's fine. That's where taste matters.

[@sonofgod2907]

+Shane Mccauley I wish more people understood this.

[@Celstray]

Shane Mccauley yes

[@connorshelton9535]

The best movie trilogy is the Indiana Jones trilogy and the best director is Steven Spielberg.

[@agentredphoenix0204]

I still say Spiderman dude

[@connorshelton9535]

The reason why I prefer the Indiana Jones trilogy is because all 3 movies are awesome whereas with Spider-Man 1 is good, 2 is great, but 3 is average.

[@agentredphoenix0204]

True man true

[@darkevilazn]

Connor The Critic You really liked Temple of Doom? Wholly shit, thats a first.

[@connorshelton9535]

darkevilazn There's actually quite a few people that love Temple of Doom. I do agree it's the weakest film in the original trilogy though.

[@Pcron7]

It's funny how 'love is important' is the only message majority of these guys get from this movie as it is so much more. It establishes and develops characters and the bond between them ( McConaughey and Mackenzie Foy), depicts the conflict : Earth dying and him leaving his daughter to go on this mission to discover habitable planets, and the resolution : surviving all odds and returning in one piece. All of this is backed by a combination solid science and plausible fiction. Yes there were some convenient instances but in a movie where so much is happening, convenience is like a calm breeze that is almost welcomed.

[@spainbarcarealmadrid]

I thought Interstellar was just meh. Ambitious but didn't live up to its enormous hype. It is a solid film that isn't an abomination but isn't a masterpiece either.

[@thesamesam6292]

+Nicholas Lim ZJ Agreed.

[@samhynninen]

Wow, Roger is really drinking the Nolan kool-aid. Seriously, you can like the movie but him claiming that it's a masterpiece is just embarassing.

[@anamorgana.]

"Well, that's just like, your opinion, man..."

[@Smeet9]

+Samuli Hynninen im not trying to correct you or anything but where did he say that interstellar was a masterpiece?

[@MrPinbert]

+randomuser942464 And you're too illiterate on good storytelling and plot development to realize that Interstellar was a bit flawed in that department.

[@Smeet9]

randomuser942464 yeah id like you to explain to me with your superior science literacy the ending in the fifth dimension love connection bullshit

[@leobergmiller873]

Michael Haneke and Pedro Almodovar are easily 2 of the best working filmmakers working today but I would imagine none of them have heard of either

[@Jostipi]

Jesus you guys have awefull taste. This was one of te best movies I've seen in years.

[@Jostipi]

***** Thats why I said I dislike their taste. I never said they were wrong. Everyone has their own opinion.

[@Jostipi]

I specificly formulated it that way because words like 'awful' remove any notice of objectivity.I never claimed to be an all knowing objective force that knows everything and is always right. I used to word awful so it was clear it was an opinion. Nothing more.

[@sma_sma]

SPOILER FOR INTERSTELLAR the reason why love is considered such a driving force in interstellar is because "they" or mankind, have left a trail of clues and advanced technology for humans to follow because they care about the human race. The love that "they" feel for mankind is then reflected upon Cooper's love for his daughter which ties the plot together in the end. I believe this movie was simply genius.

[@gaborrajnai5356]

Well, guys, honestly you didn't even get the real paradox on this movie. How Cooper sent a message through time to himself is nothing compared to how the wormhole got to Saturn. Future humans could build the tesseract for Cooper inside the black hole, if plan B worked on Wolf's planet, but without the wormhole there would not be interstellar travel, Wolf's planet, plan B and future humans, therefore who created the wormhole on the first place?

[@redpandarampage2191]

Lovin these movie fight shows!!! Keep em comin! :D Awesome channel Screen Junkies! Btw why do they have a time limit? o_O

[@BrotatoFefins]

im suprised they didn't like matt damon in the movie. his character was my favorite because it showed the human fear of being alone forever. he was amazing in my opinion, but i don't follow him in other movies so i see him as the character.

[@pilover314159]

The reason why i like lord of the rings as the best trilogy is because its more than just a movie trilogy, there are actual themes that can be taken away from the movie and applied to greater things. The first movie is the meditation of self doubt, where the ring can be viewed as a symbol of a false idealization of a greater good and young Frodo is faced with the impossible mission of overcoming self doubt. The bad guys in the first movie (these large overwhelming dark figures keep in mind) can be viewed as Frodo's own spirits that try and prevent him from going on this journey. Notice how only Frodo can see the spirits. The second movie, the twin towers, is a beautiful juxtaposition of the conflict between good and evil. The name itself is a good metaphor for this allegorical contrast, where it is implied that two twin forces, are battling. It isn't just about defending the kingdom, its about how good defends good, while bad only attacks good, i.e. helms gate was defended, the twin towers where invaded by the trees. Finally the return of the king, was a solid movie through and through. Saying the ending sucked is an insufficient statement because one must look for the greater meaning behind the ending as in the previous two films. The reason why the ending was still good was because evil is destroyed, and good triumphs over evil, and yes that may be a universally applicable motif among movies, I believe lord of the rings does this quit poetically. The casting of the ring into the volcano was to realize that Frodo can handle his own self doubt on his own and doesn't need a false totem to bring up his courage. His decision to start another journey in the end of the movie was not only a good conclusion, but an important decision for Frodo as well. Frodo made his decision to leave the village, on his own terms, that which he would have never made in the first movie (he was summoned in the first movie). Therefore there where simply no parts of the lord of the rings trilogy that may have appeared insignificant because every scene was important to the plot, and executed quite artistically which is why I think it is right to call it the greatest trilogy of all time.

[@silentprophet777]

I think the reason people don't like interstellar is simply a lot of people don't realize how weird astrophysics and theoretical physics can get. 10 dimensional theory and relativity can get really weird. If you can manipulate 4th or 5th dimensional space like we can manipulate 3 dimensional space, then the ending does make sense logically, (the only flaw being the black hole was not by any means realistically deadly in the movie) its just so weird and such an obscure brand of science that everyone just thinks its dumb mystical crap. Its the same phenomenon when witches were burned for creating medicines.

[@akash9818]

No most people disliked it because it's an absolute mess as a piece of narrative. The 3-Act structure is godawful. I don't know what happened to Nolan in recent years. Both Inception and TDKR were abysmally structured and incoherent on so many levels. This is the same person who made one of the most intricately constructed movies of the past decade with Memento and turned a Batman film into a stunning 5 Act shakespearean tragedy with the Dark Knight. What happened? Now, he seems to have forgotten how to write screenplays that aren't completely contrived and convoluted at every stage.

[@js100serch]

Derek Wilkinson I'm totally totally agree with you dude. You've said it all. Yea black holes are deadly those things would crush every atom of your body BUT!! the graphics are really acurated that was the most realistic black hole ever portrayed in a movie.

[@94Newbie]

the physics in the movie is bullshit. not time dialation in generell, but do you know how fast you would have to travel, or how deep inside a gravity well you would have to be for time to go as slow as on the planet in the movie? there is no way they could ever get out of that gravity well, especially not with a single stage to orbit vehicle like they had one (where the hell did they get that thing anyway? why did they even bother with the rocket in the beginning?). there are thousands of flaws with the movie, simple orbital mechanics even. like magically falling out of orbit and then even more magically flying out of orbit, having an orbit around a planet isnt some thin line you easily cross. the black hole looked nice, same as the wormhole but thats all there is to being accurate. and lets not even get started on how bad the story and even the premise of the story is. ok so humanity is fucking up but seriously crop failure? and then you solution is to fly to space where even if you find a nice planet you would still have to grow plants in an controlled sealed of enviroment. why not build a fucking green house on earth, sealed from the outside against disease etc. people are already doing stuff like that. there is really no way that humanity as a whole will simply starve to death. aslong as the temperatures on earth arent high enough to cook us there is a way to survive thats easier than flying into a wormhole to colonize some unknown planet. if humanity expands into space then its not because of food. its for other ressources (like rare metals and helium3), and because we choose to do it not because we would starve otherwise.

[@robertjones3443]

94Newbie finally someone who gets it. They had advanced AI (that they used for making jokes) but couldn't build greenhouses. what about the 9/10 IMDB rating for this bullshit movie? I have difficulty explaining this other than a lot of people are easily impressed by wormholes and blackholes and dimensions and think it's clever

[@Gala-yp8nx]

Robert Jones The whole thing about everyone suffocating on earth was that there was a blight that was killing off all the oxygen producing plant life on earth. I think the problem a lot of people had with understanding Interstellar (discounting plot holes) was that every single little detail mattered to the story.

[@SubterrelProspector]

I don't understand therefore PLOT HOLES duuuur

[@WryLion]

That is the pain of the Doctor Who fan that actually understands the rules of the show. While hordes of idiots call the writing terrible because they can't wrap the concept of a fixed point in time around their head.

[@supastar25]

Exactly...most of the supposed 'plot holes' I've heard of so far are just people not even attempting to understand the themes and concepts being explored.

[@Str1000ac]

Something is terrible wrong with the movie if people are discussing about "plot holes"

[@Str1000ac]

***** The whole Interstellar movie was made by fixing plot holes. It does nothing else.

[@Jessejec109]

How arrogant do you have to be lol THIS MOVIE IS NOT COMPLICATED. It spoon feeds you basically everything. Stop blaming peoples dislike for the film on not understanding. The film is completely disjointed. The pacing is awful and half the characters are irrelevant and unnecessary. It has the ambition of a Kubrick but is executed like a Shyamalan

[@JoeStaehle]

Seemed like uneducated attacks on the movie Interstellar. I understood the movie just fine and I was neither bored nor distracted. I thought it was great.

[@CaelDegg]

Same!

[@virtualsplash72]

Space and stuff is hard :P

[@cobb541]

Does Interstellar Suck ? Is that even a real question ? Because it seems to me that Interstellar is the best fucking movie of the century (after The Dark Knight). Do you wanna know why ?

[@augusteriksson878]

yes, tell me

[@eggsoup]

August Eriksson Because he is batman?

[@JayIvan2010]

August Eriksson Because he's batman.

[@JosephWorrellwes]

is it because your batman ?

[@he.smile_]

Because you're Bruce Wayne ?

[@johnhasaguitar]

What is that large man talking about? "It the most convenient movie I have ever seen" "What if he hadn't found Nasa? What if his daughter wasn't a super genius?" This logic makes no fucking sense. You could say that kind of stuff about any movie. "What if Luke had crashed his ship instead of shooting the target in the Death Star?" "What if Spock fell off a cliff while he was in Starfleet Academy?" "What if Mary Poppins got knocked up, and was therefore too busy to be a nanny to some other kids?"

[@kewltony]

Cooper flying into a black hole was not the plan. If you want to make a coherent analogy, the Star Wars plot would have depended entirely on Luke Skywalker crashing his ship (contrary to the plan) and in doing so, he sends the coordinates to the rebel base back to himself, and the plans to the death star back to his daughter. And then he reappears in his home solar system close enough to a star base that wasn't there before, just in time to be rescued before he runs out of air.

[@johnhasaguitar]

Point taken. Even if he hadn't sent the coordinates to himself, I wouldn't call this "too convenient." Usually one goes to see a movie because it's an unusual story. Every time a gunman misses the protagnist's face in a movie. "OMG SO CONVENIENT"

[@michaelhall5870]

kewltony Time DID NOT exist in the black hole! If you didn't know that then that explains why you didn't like the movie. So he could have stayed there forever, but he was found by humans in the future

[@kewltony]

Michael Hall A) He is still experiencing time, he is still breathing air, his neurons are still firing. The chemical reactions that sustain his body are still in progress. The time dilation relative to earth is unknown. B) None of this has anything to with what I said.

[@kewltony]

johnhasaguitar {{ Every time a gunman misses the protagnist's face in a movie. "OMG SO CONVENIENT" }} No, again you are saying the exact opposite thing that would complete the analogy. An analogous situation would have the protagonist, despite his best efforts, getting struck by a gunman's bullet but it happens in such a way that it transports him to another dimension where he can send a message back to his daughter that will save her, but also a message back to himself that will put him in the exact location to get hit by that bullet. And then he emerges from the dimension to be saved just before he died and OMGDRAMA while his daughter still has a few drops left in the tank.

[@Iamthedeception]

"Can we not have a 10-minute long docking sequence in space movies?" Fuck off. That scene was one of, if not the best scene in the entire movie.

[@travegbert3447]

So true. The suspense music, visuals, the ferociousness of space, physics and gravity... All exhibited by Matthew McCaughney's brilliant acting and charm: there's no comparison. Also nice display picture. You Homestuck?

[@ankushm3t]

Agreed man... Even my ass got goosebumps :p

[@Hebchabsbc]

Seriously agreed!! I was literally on the edge of my seat. Such a great scene!

[@kinghenrock3598]

the point is how cliche is it? if every space movie does it... these guys watch lots of movies from their point of view i would agree...

[@kewltony]

I'VE SPENT THE LAST FEW YEARS NOT FLYING, IN CRYO-SLEEP, AND GETTING AMMONIA POISONING THAT SHOULD HAVE BLINDED ME IF NOT KILLED ME, BUT FK YEA CHECK OUT THIS SWEET MANEUVER

[@SNOREOFF]

Watched Interstellar today and my reaction is just WOW. This is one of these movies that makes you think about humanity and were we are going. There is also a scientific part in it which makes you realize how "undeveloped" we are, for the time being. Nolan is a genius, not only he made a brilliant film but also that screenplay was fantastic you really have to be smart to come up with something like this. Anyway this movie will definitely win Oscars next year, the question is how many.

[@jarib3858]

I watched it today to!!!! and i fucking liked it! dat mindfuck!

[@ankurama42]

***** Nolan said this movie was inspired by mirror directed by Starkovsky.

[@SNOREOFF]

Nicholas Bertagna Exactly :D Also how come his movies are so popular and are in cinemas all over the world.

[@ankurama42]

***** I don't know. I haven't seen either. I just saw Nolan's interview.

[@jarib3858]

you must watch it! its DA BEST MOVIE EVER!

[@capenati]

Whoever says Interstellar sucks has no knowledge of film making and should just stick watching to Transformers and comic movies. Do I think Interstellar is a masterpiece? No, it had a few ambitions that it could never fully resolve, but the cinematography, plot, acting, direction, and general pacing were fantastic. A solid 9/10 for me.

[@clancywiggum56]

Money thinks avengers is a masterpiece. It's safe to say he doesn't have a clue about movie quality

[@jackragnarok8141]

The music and the sound in general sucked. The story was a cliche. The emotional bond between father and daughter was none existent. Whoever say Interstellar didn't suck, knows nothing about audio production or emotional story telling. And is just defending Nolan because he is Nolan. 2/10.

[@R3DSH1FT196]

Dogpool Only if you think that a film has to be an artistic masterpiece to have quality. I hate it how people think action movies that are fun to watch are somehow invalid as being good movies.

[@dolamitic]

The acting was good but was not central to the movie. As someone who understood all the physics and mathematical plot holes, I would commend them on the accuracy and explanation on a lot of these. The cinematography in a lot of areas was fantastic. The dialogue was clunky in areas and the ending was very cliche.

[@capenati]

Holypikemanz LOL what? your comment made me laugh so hard

[@ryanmccreadie152]

I loved interstellar, watched it on Friday.

[@TheQazzow]

***** Don't even compare them.

[@pedrojpinto]

Harry Arthur-worsop You don't need to compare them. There's enough love to go around. I wish we could get one of these a year.

[@JAFOpty]

Toy Story 1: One toy is lost, the other toys go find it. Toy Story 2: One toy is lost, the other toys go find it. Toy Story 3: One toy is lost, the other toys go find it. I wonder what is the plot for 4.

[@davidmendez3899]

not even close

[@JAFOpty]

Ok let me be more accurate: A toy gets lost, stolen or "left accidentally"... then goes back. BTW I am never said they are bad movies, but the plots are basically the same.

[@noecamarena9]

***** so... retrieve lost toy?

[@Ndoelicious]

JAFOpty Every superhero movies plot : origin story-introducing villains-save the world. It's a family movie, do you want them toys to be always in the house all the time?

[@JAFOpty]

I agree 100% with that superhero comment too. And It is OK, I am not a hater, but objectively, they are the same. I wish Pixar could become the next Ghibli Studios.

[@navyman8903]

Interstellar Is a Masterpiece.

[@oafkad]

By definition that means that is the best film Christopher Nolan has ever made. O.o...

[@jackjansen4704]

Isles of Scion Wrong, Inception and The Dark Knight are also masterpieces.

[@USMFAN1996]

Jack Jansen and Memento and The Prestige and Insomnia are close as well

[@oafkad]

Jack Jansen Not really. "Considered the greatest work of a person's career or to a work of outstanding creativity, skill, or workmanship." Like irony the word is losing meaning in the modern world of Hyperbole. But whatever. Not something I really care all that much about (the film itself I mean). It's a drop in the bucket compared to the Prestige or Memento.

[@jackjansen4704]

Isles of Scion Oh can we say that Interstellar is his space masterpiece, DK his superhero masterpiece, and Inception his action masterpiece?

[@tresjohns8444]

what blows my mind is that in the same breath these guys can rip apart interstellar then want more fast and furious......

[@stondexx7381]

lmao ,my thought exactly.

[@marymulroy3397]

fast and furious knows its stupid, interstellar asks you to take it seriously than hits you in the face with "love is the fifth dimension bullshit"

[@bobcharlotte8724]

They're going for different things and are incomparable. Fast n furious has no identity crisis, interstellar does.

[@breadordecide]

Why do nolan fans always defend his films with "you didn't get it?" Interstellar is pretty damn simple to anyone with an average IQ. An episode of COSMOS is more complex than Interstellar. With that said, it's a good, sometimes great film, with an awful third act. Why spend all your time being so precise and smart and then you just say "oh yeah love is the answer."

[@Shige2213]

crawl back into your hollow earth

[@Shige2213]

and you stick to your online documentarys ... i mean they are on youtube ,its the internet they must be right?

[@jasonraley2971]

***** Snoop dog should play moses in exodus. Its off topic I know, just putting it out there.

[@calick7208]

Because movies like this need some sort of emotional element, simple as that.

[@Shige2213]

Obviously he has figured it all out. He should cure cancer

[@jack0lantern93]

Roger was right in every feckin argument! He should have won them all but he was relegated to being a snob because he likes good movies.

[@princepis]

I know right?

[@CptReynoldsStuntDble]

+Jack Hartnett What a load of shit. Interstellar is a mediocre movie at best.

[@leemcqueen500]

Ok you must be a troll. Fair enough if you didn't think Interstellar was amazing, But to say it's a mediocre movie is mental.

[@CptReynoldsStuntDble]

Lee Mcqueen Nope not trolling at all. Interstellar has huge problems most people simply ignore. There are good parts: actually showing the problems of Physics when it comes to traveling in space, visuals, and some performances were great. The bad far outnumbers the good though: 2 bad performances for every 1 good performance, the score sounded like the orchestra fell asleep at their instruments, the entire 3rd act, Coop refusing to look at or speak to any of his descendants after talking to Murph for 3 minutes, and finally the horribly shoehorned implications of love between Anne Hathaway and Matthew McConaughey. I could go on but this comment is too long as it is.

[@PaddyCollector]

1, title is ok and makes sense since supposedly to justify the extreme difference in special effects/ power of the jedis in the original movies versus the prequels the people using the force were weaker than those in the past. hence the force awakens makes sense since the new jedis (luke and leia) don't know much about the force or how to use it. 2 interstellar was good just admit and stop being hipsters. 3. best director is probably david fincher but best filmmaker would be christopher nolan since he isn't just a director he writes the movies as well. unless you want to a totally different criteria like say best as in most profitable then it would be michael bay. 4. best trilogy is lord of the rings because it is just like one long movie most cohesive and they need one another to work. but best 3 individual movies would probably be back to the future or star wars. 5.fast and furious? who cares they are fun summer popcorn movies. 6. no, andy serkis is not that good. gollum is arguable but you can't really give him an oscar retroactively now can you. 7. no, even toy story 2 was totally unnecessary. all those movies are basically the same, in fact ALL pixar movies are basically the same. old thing dying off and getting replaced by the new. wall e did it, incredibles did it, cars did it, toy story did it, up did it. they are all same exact thing thematically. make a toy story tv show but no more movies. a tv show makes a ton more sense. 8. disney owns everything now so everything is basically disney anyway.

[@Nicholasryan17]

The fact that you think someone being a hipster means anything shows how fucking stupid you are.

[@FilmemachFan]

The Star Wars movies are based on Jidaigeki films (Japanese period dramas, often about the noble class of the samurai... "jidai" and "jedi"... sounds similar, doesn't it? :D), particularly on Akira Kurosawa's "The Hidden Fortress". If you have never heard about Kurosawa, well you have got to catch up with quite something.

[@PaddyCollector]

Nicholasryan17 pretty much everyone thinks the movie was good including nearly every reviewer so to say the movie sucked is just going against what everyone else is saying. and it was a joke, the easiest way to enrage people is to call them a hipster.

[@FilmemachFan]

PaddyCollector Well, you can in a way invalidate any opinion with the anti-mainstream argument. Doesn't men these vies do not have a point.

[@rward1423]

Honestly I think there is alot of stuff on the fringe of our understanding with the laws of physics going on in this movie. Alot of people don't want to see a movie that makes you think and thats OK.

[@Miss_Murph]

Something I've noticed is that the majority of people who hate the movie didn't exactly pay bloody attention. Something I've heard a lot is "how does copper just conveniently end up near Saturn?" And that is one of the stupidest fucking questions about this movie. He goes through the wormhole, that's why he ends up at Saturn! Not only that, but fat guy (sorry, don't know his name) was asking how cooper got to the NASA place. Again, stupid fucking question. Cooper had gotten the co-ordinates from TARS and had it converted to Binary to tell himself how to get there. People need to pay more attention before bashing on amazing films. :/

[@kewltony]

Except the black hole and worm hole are not the same.

[@josend]

kewltony After the tessarract collapses, he goes through the wormhole.

[@kewltony]

It was a good thing he mastered faster than light travel to escape the pull of the black hole and navigated toward the worm hole before his oxygen ran out.

[@josend]

he didnt, but maybe the ones who build the tessaract did

[@kewltony]

they build a tesserract connected to a girl's bedroom in the middle of a black hole, with a faster than light ejector seat, on the off chance that her father will fall into the black hole and convince himself to fly to the black hole... because they couldn't master morse code

[@PR0T0Blues]

I really dont understand what these guys had against interstellar. I mean comparing him to shamalan is ridiculous. This had trademarks that all scifis have which is not a bad thing. But It is very emotionally griping which many scifis lack. The actors gave a very gripping preformance. They spent like 40 minutes building the relationship between mconohay and his daughter how much more develpement did it need. And the sound track: I freaking loved it. It was powerful and fit the film so well.

[@PR0T0Blues]

When he was like "it is the most convenient movie...": he clearly did not pay attention to the plot. mcconaughey clearly LED himself to nasa and he chose his daughter becasue she was smart.  also cmaparing a nolan movie to armageddon is... not a great comparison

[@PR0T0Blues]

also that summary of the movie by the red headed guys was such a biased blow. you can make any movie sound ridiculous with a crazy summary especially a 3 hour movie

[@chanceneck8072]

Yeah, this movie really grew on me. Yet Spencer was completely right about the score and the sound mix. The sound mix REALLY sucked in this movie, sometimes you can't even hear anything what the characters say...

[@Achilles-hh2yh]

its because alot of these guys are snobs.

[@BeyondLaura]

Interstellar is the best movie of 2014, haven't seen The Hobbit yet tho.

[@VMG3001]

There is no way in hell hobbit will be better than interstellar

[@Adam-jl7qq]

What about Guardians of the Galaxy?

[@ShockwaveMuncher]

VMG3001 it might actually

[@hysteria347]

The Happy Turtle Guardians was a fun movie but Interstellar is a great film.

[@VMG3001]

Shockwave Muncher no it won't

[@swiftyproduction]

Guys, there's no point in trying to tell people in the comments that Insterstellar is shit, its a Christopher Nolan movie, which means that all the Nolanites will defend it to death and won't bother listening to your points.

[@derekholland2001]

I have noticed that... Holy shit

[@BoilingHotCoffee]

John Harrison you're acting like a nolanite right now idiot

[@aaronrivas7977]

I don't like how people think that the fact that you like a movie made by Christopher Nolan, then you are a die hard fan, and you just speak nonsense

[@swiftyproduction]

Commander Cody I was talking about how most if the people *commenting* were die hard Nolan fans.

[@RippinTent]

***** anyone who liked contact forfeits their right to have an opinion on anything for the rest of time as they have no ability to reason or even feel basic human emotions like hunger and thirst. you sir are an abomination, a scar upon the face of rationality and decency. you are the one percent of the one percent that fail to understand humanity, yet seek to control it through strange rituals the likes of which would horrify any species capable of thought. all this is incontrovertibly true and has in effect been confessed by you already. I can only conclude that your sole reason for existence is that god planned long ago to fashion a punishment for satan so severe that none could ever again question the absolute power of our lord. I only pray that when you're deep in the pit of hell, torturing the devil with your mere presence, that he can hold onto the pride that though the lord hast wrought the entirety of his vengeance upon him, that at least he, satan, is still not so despicable a being as you.

[@AmanSingh-wb5tp]

Intersteller was easily one of the worst films of the decade.

[@JoashYoungberg]

+Aman Singh Nonsense. It was incredible.

[@tritone11]

Aman Singh it was one of the best. now go watch twilight.

[@AmanSingh-wb5tp]

tritone11 judging by your suggestion I don't doubt that you consider interstellar one of the best films.

[@jaykrishnak3268]

@@AmanSingh-wb5tp just cos you don't understand general relativity which btw is a 11th grade(atleast in CBSE) chapter on which most of the movie is based on doesn't mean it's the worst movie.

[@AmanSingh-wb5tp]

@@jaykrishnak3268 lol

[@georgemeyers9087]

Dear nerds; I really think you should start watching other movies instead of watching Star Wars over and over again. There are so many names that didn't come up during the Best Director fight... But let me put one out there just to exemplify how many you have forgotten: Martin Scorsese!!!! And there are a lot more. Shame on you.

[@breadordecide]

nerds only pay attention to genre directors. What about Spike Lee, Chan wook park, wong kar wai, and so many other great directors?

[@georgemeyers9087]

breadordecide I totally agree.

[@4Everlast]

George Meyers Maybe they dont know bout those directors or did you think about them not liking their movies, theres a difference between a GOOD movie in your opinion and your FAVORITE movies. Thats why discussing films is pointless, and jet fun. ALL FILMS AS ART ARE SUBJECTIVE.

[@georgemeyers9087]

Dino Sabalić absolutely, but the fight wasn't about favorite directors, but BEST directors. While it might be impossible to convince someone it isn't impossible to give good arguments. And to me it seemed as if they didn't have enough inputs to give better arguments.

[@4Everlast]

George Meyers I agree.

[@HughWalenski]

Did anybody like me just think it was pretty ok? I mean, it was too long, and had some silly 'power of love' plot points, but it was fun and creative. How is every movie the worst thing ever, or a masterpiece? Why is every reaction either hatred or worship?

[@jamesclayton7846]

i thought that, its an okay movie lots of creative visuals cool setpieces etc. but when you start combining love and emotion with scientific plot points such as time travel and black holes. it just becomes too far-fetched. So yeah like spencer said its an ok normal movie but not a good nolan movie

[@matthewbecker3997]

Roger seriously needs to become a main member of Screen Junkies. He's one of the best parts

[@cian104]

Yeah Roger is awesome.

[@Akc3nt57]

He's the only one who make sense! Srsly Interstellar was the best SyFy movie in years!

[@xxqcwaslukxx]

Interstellar is one of the movies ever made. You made me unsubscribed, just by your stupid title. It's not a movie fight. Like you can't like interstellar because its not your type of movies. But it doesn't suck, and that is fact. If you think it sucks well.. you have no knowledge in movies.

[@notinuse3165]

They have no knowledge in in movies? You have no knowledge in the English fucking language!

[@BoilingHotCoffee]

Nobody gives a damn if you unsubscribe... You're probably still going to watch this channel for the honest trailers. Just because you like interstellar doesn't mean everyone should. Idiots seem to forget what an opinion is.

[@BestPlayedLoudLtd]

All they like is stupid superhero movies, they are the cliche of film geeks with the collectable mini figures and everything. So when a film like interstellar comes along all they can Pisa compare our to something like man of steel

[@TheCalComics]

Yes, Interstellar is one of the movies ever made. It was definitely a movie.

[@BrianDiCaprio]

That first sentence made me lol

[@harvirdhindsa3244]

Interstellar is a defining movie for Christopher Nolan. A masterpiece that will stand the test of time. And those who did not like it are likely just not very bright and are not able to keep track of the film and how time dilation and black holes really work. And what the hell was it with bashing Hans Zimmer? That man is a genius composer and I have not heard a single score of his that wasn't great. Interstellar, Inception and the Dark Knight are three movies among others that make Christopher Nolan the best there is today.

[@Laf92]

Does anyone actually know how wormholes work?

[@Laf92]

I don't think people hated interstellar because they didn't get the science, I liked it but it had lots of flaws.

[@harvirdhindsa3244]

longhorns13192 what flaws, may I ask? That's fine its your opinion but justify it please.

[@harvirdhindsa3244]

longhorns13192 wormholes are a real possibility and are obviously one of the more extreme physics present in the film. I know the concepts partially at least and understood the movie. But no one on this planet can say they know all there is about wormholes. If they do, they are lying to you.

[@Laf92]

Harvir Dhindsa the exposition in the first 40 minutes of the film was clunky. The justification for the ending with the watch was nonsensical. But despite that I did not think the ending was bad, i thought the movie did earn that "sappy" black hole discovery because it set it up well in the beginning (that ghost stuff with Murphy). It was a great sci-fi adventure movie that provoked a lot of emotions and thought so I have little to complain about it

[@QLCHerald]

Interstellar was an average movie! Full stop.

[@QLCHerald]

I don't have the defining answer to how average the movie was (and it definitely was) The movie just felt lazy to me, if it weren't for Christopher Nolan, a lot more people would realise that its average. It show in the rating of rotten tomatoes.

[@Hojotheklown]

QLCHerald Rotten tomatoes really isn't a good measure. You're entitled to your opinion though. I enjoyed it however.

[@QLCHerald]

Thanks for being reasonable!

[@TBH717]

In what way could it be average? Having seen the movie myself and having an understanding for general critical reception for the film, it really is one of "those" movies that you either love of hate. It's ambition, the scope of the story told, the grandeur and awe of the visual effects and the journey put it at such an extreme end of the spectrum that I can't see how it could fall into "average" territory such as science-fiction movies like Prometheus and Signs.

[@RedRushFilms]

INTERSTELLAR was an amazing film!!

[@rickylongo2808]

People keep calling Matt Damon a straight villain but he wasn't! He still wanted to help humanity! I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY EVERYONE KEEPS CALLING HIM EVIL. He was just selfish and a coward, that doesn't make you evil. He wanted to be picked up so he can go to the other planet with the other team.

[@rickylongo2808]

Also people keep talking about things that don't make sense, when a lot of the movie is saying there is so much out there that we can't even comprehend..like love.

[@bradyjohnson383]

He was the human Hal, I mean he wasn't evil he did what he thought was right like Hal.

[@rickylongo2808]

Brady Johnson Pretty much, except the whole giving them false information. But that was just because he was selfish and a coward, but he still wanted to save humanity. He wouldn't have tried killing McConaughey if he didn't try going home.

[@Fletchersfletch]

Ricky Longo very true. Imo the movie was amazing. My only complaint would be the slow beginning, but they did talk about the moon landing :) *SPOILERS* The people I went to see it with all disliked the 5th dimensions moment, but I liked it. I'm not a fan of superhero movies or anything exaggerated and I think it was a cool idea. We act like we knew everything, but theirs so much humans dont understand. The fact that the aliens were advanced humans was pretty cool too. My brother said it ripped off 2001, but I disagree. And will people let The Dark Knight go already. Yes a good movie, but lol better then this? No!!

[@rickylongo2808]

The Shamal Casino I thought it was amazing too! And I can see where the 2001 comparisons come from but in no way is it a rip off of it. To me what I took out of it the most was that there are so many things that humans right now can't even comprehend and that's why they don't directly explain every little thing.

[@jack0lantern93]

I'm baffled at how the fact that lotr was thought of as one big long movie does't qualify it as the best trilogy by definition?

[@BtXpGaming]

Jack Hartnett but it isnt 3 hours its 6 with 2 sets of movies they are meant to be told as 1 big advenutre

[@AlexTTzer0]

Jack Hartnett If u are saying Lotr is long but that shouldnt matter,i defenitely agree with u man. Plus if i want to see a good movie,i prefer to see something good for 3 hours than for 1 hour and a half...and lord of the rings is 10 hours AND IT IS THE DEFINITION OF THE BEST MOVIE!

[@PK_Fire]

Jack Hartnett I am so pissed. It's 3 movies, that's a trilogy! And each are distinct in their own right!

[@DevilsAdvocateofnazareth]

Will Benjamin say that, then watch the godfather 'trilogy', or kill bill volumes I and II. It's 1 big fucking story- the numbers are just there to tell you where to come back after your piss break.

[@bradwright9477]

The Hobbit films have been brilliant, these guys wouldn't know a fun movie if it slapped them across the face

[@salvador155]

Brilliant is too strong a word. Hobbit movies have been a lot of fun, but they aren't any where close to brilliant.

[@danielevans5160]

As Bilbo said, "Oh no. What have we done?"

[@rocksteel9238]

salvador155 Regardless as to whether you think they're brilliant or not I think we can agree Nick Mundy saying those movies suck is way too harsh for and my definition a movie that sucks is one that is not and cannot be fun for anyone and with the Hobbit Films story telling aside it has enough good action and humor to be fun and entertaining not to mention it does have a lot of good moment as well like for instance Bilbo meets Gollum, Gandalf goes into Dul Gul Dur, and Bilbo's confrontation with Smuag. And not to mention unlike the Prequels the Hobbit films don't intorduce any lore breaking bullshit like mini clorienes.

[@rocksteel9238]

***** Yeah and the truth is though the movies may get stretched thin at times they do have some great epic momments worthy of lord of the rings like when Bilbo meets Golum, or when Bilbo meets Smaug and has to by time by talking to the dragon, or even gandalf in Dul Gu Dur.

[@Morgi647897]

No, they weren´t.

[@MobBossBobRoss]

Nick knows diddily-squat of today's movies, and pretty much resorts to the same 80s action films whenever he gets a chance to speak. He used to be fine to watch, but he's gotten sooo repetitive that it feels like he bogs down every discussion. Does anyone else feel that way?

[@iAmerica1776]

Nope, we need different aspects and opinions for this whole fight to work. We need an 80's action movie lover just as much as we need a Disney fan or a Fast and the Furious enthusiast. People like reassurance of their own opinions. They wanna hear other people who share the same opinions. Just because you're not a big 80's fan doesn't mean there aren't others who are. There just having fun. Plus I like Dick Fundy

[@MobBossBobRoss]

Jacob King You dont think the others (or i) love 80s movies? We're all aware of them and their awesomeness. Nick just doesn't provide decent arguments for them, it's always just "They're awesome".

[@v1d30c05]

I disagree. There was only one time I remember Nick just using the awesome argument and that was Iron Man vs. Captain America. Most of the time, he cites previous plot lines and themes and shows the incongruity and inconsistency of them. He often uses the perspective of someone who view of films isn't limited to the last five years, as most of the others seem to be at times.

[@MobBossBobRoss]

Marcos Velasquez Okay, i was being hyperbolic saying he knows nothing about movies and that he just claims his favourite movies to be awesome, BUT he doesn't delve into the intricacies. How does he argue for Star Wars in this? He goes broad: It's consistent, it's fun, it's what got them into movie-geekdom. He doesn't address such matters as the practical effects, setting, or tone of the film. Those, i think, would have won him the fight instantly. We're getting watered-down arguments from a relatively stubborn guy fixated on 80s films. They might as well put one of their dads on the show.

[@hysteria347]

100% agree. Couldn't even watch this episode because he's so annoying.

[@jarib3858]

when the movie ended and everyone left the theater, no-one talked because of the mindblow!

[@jbaum10]

That was the same for me! Amazing movie!

[@jarib3858]

damn right!

[@NidorinoAlliance]

I am yet to find someone who praises Interstellar for another reason other than "It's scientifically accurate" and "The performances are good". People seem to be avoiding talking about the script written by two men with their own pretentiously poetic thumb stuck up their asses. Hmm...

[@imasepan]

And this is why nobody except me bothered to reply to you.

[@NidorinoAlliance]

Hurry Calls Every single top comment I can see for this video is saying that the movie's a masterpiece for just those two reasons. It's kind of baffling.

[@jamesbuchanan4979]

stfu

[@imasepan]

kentucky fried chicken whoa dude. I liked the movie but you shouldn't go around hating on peoples opinions.

[@jamesbuchanan4979]

im sorry

[@gdbaradit]

It's funny how Nolaners try to look down on people who don't like his movies. His movies are fun, but they DO HAVE tons of plot holes. Deal with it.

[@svallee]

You realize there's as many people who disliked Interstellar going out of their ways to look down on people who loved the movie, right? It's a two way mud fight. Personally, I don 't care much for most of Nolan's movies, so I was relatively surprised to love Interstellar as much as I did.

[@gdbaradit]

blahblahblah Proly, but there's this annoying tendency of some people who think Nolan movies are so deep, profound, and complex, and by not liking them you get a condescending "you just don't have the brain for them" . And that really piss me off. I really enjoy Nolan's movies, but I think he is not a perfectionist at all.

[@XxBatmanCrusaderxX]

Tons? Name them.

[@fuckwebrat]

back to transformers bro pls

[@rkrokberg]

Giorgio Baradit I understand what you mean, but when people point out flaws that aren't flaws at all and bash the movie because of their own stupidity, let them be educated. I don't think nearly everyone who disliked Interstellar did so because "they didn't get it", but there's many who did it for that reason, and it's bloody annoying when people act like they know better than actual science.

[@marcusluera89]

Worst episode yet. The screaming match was horrible. I still think this show needs Grace Randolph .

[@Noctis198]

aw hell no!

[@LostUtopiaFilms]

I agree on everything except adding in Grace lol

[@albertpnc]

That might be kind of tricky, she's on the opposite side of the coast.

[@marcusluera89]

albertpnc she could use Skype and be apart of the show that way.

[@lefred5151]

I dont think the episode sucks but the screaming stuff was way too fucking loud almost woke people up in my house

[@darthvator955]

If you think interstellar was convinent, just wait till you see the martian

[@koubl]

both but yes the Martian was awful in its final third.

[@bkdmode]

How the hell can you a call yourself a movie nerd and not even mention Steven Spielberg as the greatest director? He has been nominated 7 times and won twice. He directed such greats as Jaws, Close Encounters, E.T, the Indiana Jones Trilogy, Jurassic Park, Minority Report, War of The Worlds (2005) In a more serious tone, greats he directed included, Color Purple, Empire of The Sun, Schindler's List, Saving Private Ryan, Catch Me If you Can, Munich, Lincoln. I do not even remember the name of the guy Mundy said, not sure if he was serious or not... Ridley Scott directed some classics too but he can't hold a candle to Spielberg. Ridley has been nominated 3 times compared to Steven's 7 and Ridley never won. The closest to Spielberg by active directors is Scorsese who has been nominated 8 times but won only once plus Spielberg has shown a greater range, though Scorsese is better at getting the best performances from his actors.

[@bkdmode]

Niko So Schindler's List was mindless, The Color Purple was mindless, Lincoln was mindless, Saving Private Ryan was mindless? Amistad was mindless? Let me guess, you never saw any of the movies I listed, you only saw his scifi genre movies.

[@Bl4ckBull3t1]

martin scorsece :)

[@user-xo7yt1cw9n]

what about clint eastwood? he hasnt directed alot of movies but the ones he has are amazing and nominated every time

[@i_am_ergo]

War of the Worlds was one of the biggest piles of shit in movie history.

[@i_am_ergo]

***** Well, phrasing alone hints towards that. So yes, obviously I'm exaggerating. Point being, Brian should not have brought it up.

[@KimberlyPerrye]

Re: Interstellar - the genius of the film is that the "sappy love story" & the "ghost element" that you guys hated so much is the very first film representation of a complex scientific theorem, 5D "Bulk Beings" interacting with our 3D "brane". The difficulties inherent in translating those concepts mathematically are daunting enough and to be able to put them onscreen, making them pivotal to the theme and plot, is beyond commendable; it is extraordinary. Yes, the "love story" and the "ghost in the bookshelf" seem out of place and perhaps a bit corny or simplistic in a Sci-Fi 'space film' at first glance, yet when you realize that Christopher Nolan is actually giving a doctorate-level physics lesson to the entire world through his storytelling, we should be in awe of his gifts. There is a reason that so few every achieve the level of education and understanding requisite to study 5D Bulk, 3D brane, theoretical gravity, and the physics of black holes, and despite these barriers Nolan created a vehicle in Interstellar that allows even children to grasp these concepts and for that, we should give him the credit he is due.

[@johnhasaguitar]

Kimberly Perrye Fuck yes. Thank you! No one even attempts to address subjects such as these in a Hollywood film. Is it perfect? No. But a couple of tiny flaws don't negate the fact this is one of the most ambitious and brilliant movies of all time. I'm glad he didn't pander to the lowest common denominator. How any intelligent even quasi-scientifically minded person (or at least one who can appreciate raising the bar for intelligent concepts in a film) can brush off this film boggles my mind. This film actually gives me hope for the future, for raising the intellectual bar when it comes to entertainment, and reigniting the spark in some for science. I saw this for the first time in STL, and was impressed I later went on to see it at the largest imax in the country in NYC in 70mm film. If you haven't seen the 70mm version, please find a location that it showing it before it disappears. You won't have another opportunity to see it in 70mm in the future.

[@KimberlyPerrye]

johnhasaguitar LoL, I'm glad my post was appreciated. To be frank, this film ought to be part of the curriculum for Intro To Physics/Astrophysics in college. A singular achievement for Nolan et al.

[@johnhasaguitar]

or even better, at the highschool level. Generate interest in the field before reaching college.

[@KimberlyPerrye]

johnhasaguitar Agreed. It would be a refreshing change & a needed step forward.

[@alprudhomme1]

I really appreciate your comment on the film Kimberly. I couldn't agree more. I don't think I've ever seen such a successful blend of art and science in cinema before, and it has to be celebrated. The film may actually inspire future researchers to be interested in those questions and keep making important discoveries.

[@Expl0rati0n]

The fact that Gravity got a higher rating than Interstellar bugs me to no end. I liked both movies, but Interstellar was far superior in the storytelling, the music, and even the visuals. The ending of Interstellar was a bit weak but it still hit a high note. Yes even I was rolling my eyes at the Matt Damon part, if there's anything I'll critique the movie about it's everything involving Matt Damon. Other than that I feel like it was one of the best movies I've ever seen in Theaters. The wormhole visuals were mindblowing, feeling my clothes shake from the loud take off was amazing, the time dilation was done perfectly. If you like superhero movies but didn't like Interstellar you're the reason why the movie industry sticks to the same old formula over and over.

[@BrynjarReynisson]

While I dont like the plot of interstellar it actually has a plot unlike gravity. Gravity sucks

[@1997residente]

Gravity is much easier to watch...and there was no Exposition !! Just Suspense...there is no phylosophy and no unnecesssary characters with boring developments.

[@InterpretHowever]

+Expl0rati0n Gravity is far, far better

[@deathrager2404]

superior story telling? so jumping from A to Z with very little explanation, very little bonding is good storytelling? LOL you have no standards. they go from earth to space within seconds barely explaining anything, characters are not bonding. this is not a good movie bro.

[@hablemosde1950]

@@InterpretHowever área you kidding me? Interestellar its a Masterpiece...Gravity it's only a funny film

[@conkersla]

intestellar had - amazing graphics - good music - accurate science facts but god damnit the plot was SHIT, the story is the main thing in a movie so the movie sucked.

[@robinshaw4748]

conkersla Why does the story suck? Provide a reason.

[@kewltony]

darkevilazn "falling into a black hole makes corn grow in orbit around saturn" - interstellar fan's 100% accurate scientific opinion

[@nickelpickle1134]

I liked the story because of the huge twist in the end