Does the Fine Tuning of the Universe Demonstrate the Existence of God?

[@johngeverett]

JWW, you take technical scientific concepts and put them within the grasp of the folks in the pews! Great presentation!

[@red-eyedmagister1595]

Please understand this: The Scientific Community will do anything to AVOID LETTING THAT DIVINE FOOT IN THE DOOR!!! for to do that would mean they would have to acknowledge the authority and divinity of Jesus Christ and the Church. if you took nothing away from this brilliant man's lecture, please get that!!! have a great week!!!

[@johnsey2625]

JJW is gifted by God in explaining difficult concepts simply to all

[@JRTIGER07]

This is No longer a Cold case ..Great work Detective 🙏 Blessings 🙏

[@soulbrothermike316]

Absolutely amazing, informative, and enjoyable presentation. Thank you J. Warner for strengthening my faith and giving us a reasonable and repeatable approach we can use to share the truth about God’s existence with others.

[@nejiskafir8198]

We should ask the Multi-versers for their evidence. Extrodinary claims require extraordinary evidence, does it not?

[@cougarcat7070]

Thank you! This video is pure gold! Very engaging and informative.

[@sabhishek9289]

@@markgallemore8856 Ahh yes a cry baby named Mark Gallemore spotted crying and complaining without even watching the video.

[@Katharina643]

Thank you so much for this. You made such a wonderful case for the Creator. For me it is the one who says I AM the Eternal One. His name is Yehovah ❤

[@Myfivestarsuccess]

Wonderful teacher! Great examples! Every Christian needs to watch/ listen to this video!

[@shipwright6122]

The Heavens declare His glory 🙏🏼💫 A fool in his heart says there is no God

[@arcguardian]

Man that last question was tough. Especially when he said the conversation is over the moment I go to the Bible. I also lack conversation skills so that doesn't help either... it's like asking a swordsman to fight and win w/o his sword.

[@papermason]

Multiverses -- like practice makes perfect ending up with our universe? So who was practicing?

[@sdm101869]

I think he missed his own pun. It would take 12 royal flushes to form Atoms or.... Adams.....😊

[@sanityisnotstatistical5912]

Phenomenal presentation 👏

[@Lillaloppan]

Thank you so very much 🙏😊!

[@justmefl7045]

An hour and ten minutes to answer the question? Let me help - Yes.

[@lexiatel]

To prove the question that people still don't grasp ❤️

[@Michael_H_Nielsen]

Good ending. But what is probably better is to speak prophetic into peoples lives by the power of the holy spirit.

[@markalfery5830]

Infinity is not a number it is a concept. the number one is a number.

[@automatic6216]

I'm sure if JWW leaves it alone long enough, his PowerPoint will evolve through time and chance and appear on the screen - at least in one of the Multiverses.

[@chisexton5845]

God is so good.

[@JoylieC]

Thank you very much!

[@RichWards-Wins]

Yes the universe was created. GOD is very REAL. Ask JESUS and HE will reveal HIMSELF to you.

[@farhadfaisal9410]

Alternatively, you may postulate -- in place of postulating an 'uncreated creator' of the universe -- that the universe exists on its own needing nobody to create it. (It would avoid one extra hypothetical step that is not needed for its factual existence.)

[@gregariousguru]

He's right......"chance" consists of no properties or mechanisms. It's an abstract concept....not science!

[@mildom9223]

Multiverse theory can disprove anything, even itslef

[@Dylan_Devine]

If the multiverse theory is true then there's a universe where it isn't.

[@nadams8863]

Amen✝️❤️🙏🙋‍♂️

[@johnmartin4152]

Minor quibble: Kaku has said repeatedly that he believes in a sort of "God", i.e. the God of an Einsteinian/Spinozan variety of pantheism, a "god of order". He does not buy the explanation that depends on chance plus self-organisation plus time as the only factors that matter. Larry Kraus is kind of cocky...no kidding?

[@garyevans4524]

Doesn’t take a genius to see a design in everything

[@timb8970]

Where do they get the 1 in 10 to the 60 chance for hitting a target at the other end of the universe? How was that determined?

[@DaBigRMV]

Yes.

[@fortunatomartino8549]

Multi verse is science fiction

[@red-eyedmagister1595]

If you are not practically doubled up in pain from laughter at this multiverse nonsense ( these clowns don't see the obvious with their superior intellects) then i have to question your CSQ ( commons sense quotient as opposed to intelligence quotient). have a great day!

[@flickedbic]

Multiverse theory as posited via universal inflation would knock out a number of these points. I agree, the universe appears to be designed with fine-tuning. If ours was the only universe, this would be very powerful. We are looking for good evidence for the multiverse, but that seems a difficult proposition. Thanks I'm going to go back to watching as I'm sure you address this.

[@Xgy33]

Absolutely not. There’s no a shred of evidence for that bs theory

[@appaloosa42]

BUT: where did the multiverse generator come from? Is that your version of an uncreated eternal source… albeit impersonal, so there is no personal surrender to authotity required?

[@mrsteresa1999]

Hi Jim 👋😁

[@jeffross8676]

If there is signs of past life on Mars that would just point to the fall.

[@JScholastic]

J

[@djsarg7451]

Does the Fine Tuning of the Universe Demonstrate the Existence of God? Yes. To have life anywhere in the history of the universe, the mass of the universe must be exactly what it is. More mass and the universe would only have only heavier-than-iron elements. Less massive and there would not be enough heavy elements needed for life. The required fine-tuning is so extreme (one part in a quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion) that if a single dime’s worth of mass was added or removed, no life anywhere at any time in the universe. This is just one parameter, dark energy, dark matter, the expansion rate and a number of other parameters also must be highly fine tuned.

[@shipwright6122]

The fact that we even have a job title like “Theoretical physicist” says a lot about the condition of “science” these days.

[@JScholastic]

Science is all about what ifs nowadays.

[@Sooner-im9qf]

Well, we don't know everything about everything as yet, so it's ok to have theories and investigate different avenues of possibility. Sometimes they are researched and found to be proven true and knowledge is advanced. Some are researched and don't work out, which still advances knowledge.

[@tonyr6365]

Jesus is the Son of God. Jesus was born by the virgin Mary who conceived by God. For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son so that anyone who believes in Him shall not perish but have everlasting life. Jesus raises the dead, casts out devils, and heals people. Jesus did no violence and no deception was found in His mouth. Jesus did no sins. Jesus was crucified and died for the sins of the world. Jesus's Blood was shed for the forgiveness of sins. Jesus is the lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world. Jesus was buried in a sepulchre. On the third day God resurrected Jesus from the dead to Life. Jesus left the tomb. Jesus was seen alive by Mary Magdalene and other women. Jesus was seen to be alive by Peter, the Twelve, over 500 brethren at once, James, all the apostles and Paul. Paul persecuted the church but became a christian when Jesus appeared and talked to Him. Jesus Christ is Lord. Anyone who calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved. Jesus ascended to heaven and sat down at the right hand of God. Jesus will return to earth. Read the Bible, New Testament to know more.

[@moriahgamesdev]

The trouble with the fine tuning argument is that you can say this about anything. The only reason we think we are special is because we said so.

[@potatoxgaming9466]

Just because we ate designed does not mean we are special there are higher being out there.

[@gregariousguru]

Your cookie cutter argument might have had some ground if only life wasn't balanced on a razors edge. If the universe didn't have precision to sustain or create life, you might have argument. If the goldilocks phenomenon was common throughout the universe, you might have an argument. Only the fundamental constants proves to be finely tuned and "special." Your "chance" consists of no properties or mechanisms to suggest anything. It's purely an abstract concept....not science!

[@astrawboiii1853]

What you said is literally debunked in this video.