DOGE: Are Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy on Mission Impossible? • Prof G Ramesh

[@rtos]

A good point made by Prof Ramesh. Work with the bureaucracy or any other entity you're trying to optimise, rather than condemning and shaming them from the onset. Even with Twitter there would have been excellent employees who were core contributors, however Musk's approach was to blacken everyone right from the onset, and humiliate the essential team to get his way.

[@Wiintb]

Look like you are a bureaucrat!😂 Good people in Twitter might have left. Business goes on. Chain saw and done. India should go out and remove UPSC.

[@gautamtendulkar8808]

Jai Hind Jai Bharat

[@SarahScott-o8x]

Thanks for sharing! Just a quick off-topic question: I have USDT in my OKX wallet and I have the recovery phrase. 《pride》-《pole》-《obtain》-《together》-《second》-《when》-《future》-《mask》-《review》-《nature》-《potato》-《bulb》. What is the best way to transfer them to Binance?

[@satyabratamaiti2848]

Nothing is impossible if you don't have to do it.

[@geethanjalirajaram9288]

Mr Sree, they can take people from the bulging govt offices for setting up offices for Musk and Vivek. That way they need not employ new people and spending more. Same with the office too. For all we know Musk could be planning on AI of his firm doing business with the govt to make money rather than people earning? Secondly, does the govt functioning and axing, making people work, the way they slog in the private companies actually work? I hope for the sake of democrats it will. Then other countries can take a leaf out of their books.

[@emmanuelpark4847]

Sorry to say Prof. , is out of touch. You should see the video by Musk outlining the structure of his goal. For ex Musk said he asked Google how many Govt agencies in the US, and even Google and every AI could not give a proper count. Google put the number between 420 and 450. Musk then asked , supposing we start a new country, how many agencies would you need ? 40 , 50, 100?

[@DilipBMadan]

Things are generally done for reasons never stated.

[@KKJain-v1q]

Sir will there will be award wapsi in US or something similar to.Already many are making noise abt the picks of admins

[@geethanjalirajaram9288]

But Prof Ramesh, what happens then, wouldn't the unemployment rate increase drastically leading to the word of America?

[@dilipchanchani8772]

There is always a job loss after the new invention. When the auto came cycle the rickshaw man lost job

[@paulB77166]

Very boring and confused guy

[@inoidontknow]

Vivek is the reincarnated Swami Vivekananda

[@user-jh9kj5hk8h]

😂 is he even sure what he is talking about ?!

[@nsmurty4296]

Mr Iyer, Your guest does not know anything. This is a sheer waste of everyone's time and even misleading. His experience is with the Indian bureaucracy whose legacy and history are totally different from the USA. Modern India is a country still in the making, battling several fissiparous tendencies and has won significant battles against breakup and achieved a reasonable measure of unity, based largely on two factors. One is its legacy, Anglicized bureaucracy and the other is the defacto adoption of English. These two have served to unify your country and continue to do so, sometimes at the expense of native voice, culture, religion and philosophy, but that is for a more developed India to wrestle with. Coming to the USA, the situation is totally different. The USA is the most mature political country in the world, i.e. has the longest system of constitutional government (you could compare with the British but that is not strictly or technically constitutional). What this means is that the role of the federal government and its bureaucracy in the USA is different because of its historical evolution, the political philosophy of the USA and the impact of Marxist/socialisms of the 20th century. All of these have been conflated by your guest(s). The US federal government is not the primary deliverer in the areas of healthcare and education, that role was always historically the primary function of the states and local governments. The US is a very strongly federal system (unlike India which is far more centralized administratively and also in a certain conceptual sense, politically). On the other hand several departments have been started in the US federal government due to historical political factors. The department of education is a prime example. The federal DOE does not actually dictate school syllabi or school programs as that is the purview of the states. However, in response to the growing socialisms of the world in the early to late 20th century, there was a systematic growth of an overarching education bureaucracy in the US, primarily to give federal government a way to control the state and thus the school education within all the states. There are positive aspects to this such as enforcement of civil rights and countering systemic prejudices and discriminations that may be prevalent in state and local communities. The negative is of course the overarching bureaucracies that have been captured by elitist interests which are self dealing. That is where the role of these outside consultants comes in, to preserve the essential functions of such departments or the federal government in ensuring civil rights and equality, but also curtailing bureaucratic excesses and obstructionisms evident in the past experience of the administration. Similarly, there are several departments whose roles and regulations are being questioned. Your guest bringing up Arsenic toxic contamination in drinking water is misleading. Nobody would suggest that the federal government does not have a role in protecting the environment.

[@anilnema3274]

अडानी पर घुस के आरोप पर भी विडियो बनाकर भेजे।

[@AshokJayanthi]

Very pessimistic

[@SumantraSen-bi8wi]

No comment from you on the AG pick - Matt Gaetz ? These kind of moral less trash are being picked by Trump

[@RS-ox1vd]

Someone’s thrash is somebody’s diamond!