DON'T buy G-Master Lenses, get THIS instead

[@razafiarisonmichael4421]

Me explaining to my wife in 11 min why did I make the expense 😂😂

[@MarcelGlas]

👌😂😂

[@VincenteArt]

Agree 100%, I sold my 24-70 GMii for the 20-70, and I have zero regrets.

[@MarcelGlas]

That's great to hear! Happy you enjoy it as much as I do

[@Cary_mac]

What work do you produce that you didn’t need the 2.8?

[@MarcelGlas]

@@Cary_mac As I mostly work alone, there is lots of different gernes I'm regularly doing. This includes real estate, corporate videos, music videos, festivals, product videos and more.

[@JaneivyHilario]

Man, This video autoplayed while I was cooking and I just came back to watch it again. So just on audio alone you had me sold on your channel. Incredible job. I also agree on the focal length vs fstop. I'm also going to pick up this lens, when I was never considering it.

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks a ton! You may wanna check out my affiliate link in the description if you'd like to support the channel for free 🙌😊

[@piasadlere]

This was an excellent video. Your shot sequence and sound design is incredible. I was intrigued the entire time. Another sub!

[@MarcelGlas]

Happy to have you here! 🙌

[@eddy.alexandru]

Absolutely loved your perspective on the f/4 zoom lenses! It’s great to see someone highlight the practicality of lightweight gear without sacrificing versatility. I’ve always preferred the flexibility of f/4 zooms, paired with primes for low-light situations, rather than lugging around heavy f/2.8 lenses everywhere. Your video really validated my approach. Thank you for sharing this!

[@MarcelGlas]

Thank you for commenting Eddy! Happy to hear that you came to the same conclusion 🙌

[@PizzlesTechTime]

I went extremely overboard purchasing gear because my first gig was a wedding. I did not have enough equipment to shoot it by myself and hired someone. It was very challenging for me and I have now overbought and need to work on my website portfolio and getting clients before anything else. I really liked your video and I appreciate your perspective.

[@MarcelGlas]

Happy you found it helpful! Don't be upset about it, these things happen and it's important that you've learned a valuable lesson for your upcoming projects. There is always an opportunity to improve and do better next time 🙌

[@koronka1082]

i own a lumix s1 for only a couple weeks and have only one lens 20-60mm, I tried to think if i needed an extra lens, but this just fulfills 99,9% of my videography and photography needs PS. your video is a masterpiece

[@MarcelGlas]

Glad that you've found the perfect lens for you! That focal range is really versatile.

[@quanglinhnguyen7407]

I have the S1R and completely agree with you; for event, portrait, and fashion shooting, I don’t need another lens. just 20-60 is enough

[@azuki2919]

Completely underrated. I hope to see you get more views in the future

[@MarcelGlas]

That means a lot to me!

[@NathanBuildsRobots]

I haven’t taken the 20-70 off of my camera for almost a year now. I still have my sigma 24-70, which produces better photos and has better contrast, but with that lens I would occasionally need to switch over to an 18mm for wider shots. Most of my video work is stopped down to f/4-f/11 anyways, so there really isn’t much of a downside to the slower aperture. It also works for near-macro. Just an incredible video lens overall, and weighs half as much as my 2.8 standard zoom. It doesn’t cure my gear acquisition syndrome, but it is effective treatment.

[@NathanBuildsRobots]

I will say that if I ever had to do high frame rate video in low light I’d maybe switch over, but filming everything at 24fps, you really don’t need more light. 1/50th of a second exposure lets in a ton of light

[@MarcelGlas]

Agree with everything you said!

[@richarddzisiewski7197]

took a chance on getting this lens as I have the Sony 23-70 when it came out and have not regretted it. Love this lens and as you’ve mentioned, if you do need a faster lens for low light then you can always change !! Very happy with it

[@MarcelGlas]

Totally agreed! Glad you enjoy it as much as I do 🙌

[@CatacombMan]

It's the best lens Sony has made, hands down. The minimum focusing distance is a revelation.

[@MarcelGlas]

Another good reason to pick it up 🙌

[@ITMUSTBESTEPHAN]

Banger video, mate! Can’t wait to see more stuff from you!

[@MarcelGlas]

Thank you Stephan! There's a lot more in the works 🙌

[@HDBnB1]

I love my 20-70 f4 and although i wish it was a 2.8 this video makes me want to focus more on composition and creating depth. Great video

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks for watching! The perfect lens for me would probably be a 20-105mm f2 but that thing would be impossibly large so I'll gladly stick with the 20-70mm instead... 😄

[@Onesnapmedia]

Awesome video man, very informative. My setup is Tamron 17-28 2.8/ Tamron 35-150 2 2.8 and Sony 70-200 F4 macro oss II paired with the fx3 & fx6.

[@MarcelGlas]

Sounds very versatile as well. I'm quite curious about the 70-200mm f4.

[@got2b981]

banger video dude, the narration is absolutely beautiful

[@MarcelGlas]

Thank you so much!

[@UV_MEDI]

This is the first video of yours I’ve watched, and im impressed, kinda changed my view on photography, thank you.

[@MarcelGlas]

I'm glad to hear this! There's more coming soon 🙌

[@jaybanzia]

This man bring a certain werner herzog vibe to the video that I can't help but like.

[@MarcelGlas]

I can definitely see where you're coming from ✌️😂

[@arminbreuer7968]

Marcel, are you Bawarian by any chance?

[@MarcelGlas]

@@arminbreuer7968 I'm from Baden-Württemberg, so somewhat close. 😄

I have it since early 2023. it's beautiful, great sharpness and versatility!

[@MarcelGlas]

Agreed! 🙌

[@danmarm5357]

Love the thumbnail, what typography did you use? Looks beautiful

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks! It's called Bee four. 🙌

[@danmarm5357]

@@MarcelGlas thank you 🙇🙇

[@Mraz75]

Great review and your video is full of art. So dope. I was convinced with your Tamron 2.8 lens. Hence i went to buy 24-50mm lens. I already had this 20-70mm and later had PZ 16-35mm. These are all great lenses. But i need to experience the 2.8 lens and i'm grateful with your two reviews on Tamron. May be once i'm done with FE 24-50mm i would go back to 20-70mm. that ultra wide and extra reach are really versatile for run n gun situation. Thank you for inspiring me.

[@MarcelGlas]

Glad it was helpful! You know your needs better than anybody else. Often times testing it yourself will quickly point you in the right direction. :)

[@Mraz75]

@@MarcelGlas thank you that is reassuring for me.

[@calebbrunkow]

Absolutely love this lens, it never leaves my FX3 unless I’m slapping some vintage glass on

[@MarcelGlas]

Agreed! Great combo 🙌

[@cbcinematics]

Love the way you presented this! Thanks a lot! I know a lot went into making this video ✊️ (subbed btw)

[@MarcelGlas]

Trying my best to give every piece of equipment a fair shot and actually use in in real world situations. Glad you liked it and happy to have you here!

[@AndyMitchell.]

I subbed and rang the bell seeing beautiful video through out the video and a very pleasant voice over covering a subject I find fascinating was well worth it keep on creating great work

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks Andy! Happy it was worth the watch!

[@8notes_]

Insightful video, KZbinrs taught more facts like this and not blindly hype every new product that comes out. Thank you!

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks a lot! This is exactly what I strive to do 🙌

[@stevenwaldstein2249]

Thank you. I am not a video shooter so my needs are different. I’ve recently started using the two newer Sony compact C bodies of the A7CII and A7CR for travel so smaller lenses have attracted me away from my GM primes and GMII holy trinity. I consider the 20-70/4 G but decided to try the newer 16-25/2.8 G and 24-50/2.8 G instead. Different trade-offs but I still may try a 20-70/4 G since I like its flexible focal range. T also looks ideal to pair with the FE 70-200/4 MACRO G OSS II. Another smaller size, for its focal range, telephoto zoom. All great offerings. Take care.

[@MarcelGlas]

Hey thanks for sharing! I've also been thinking about the 70-200 f4 Macro for a while now. Currently I can't justify a purchase but it stays on my list. :) I'd say the 20-70 is absolutely worth a shot, should you need a bit more reach during your shoots. But definitely get some good hands on experience with the other two lenses first. 🙌

[@TheFilmmakersWorkshop]

I do similar work to you on Lumix FF and have 3 lenses; 24-105 f4, 14-24 f2.8 and a 45 f2.8. FWIW I have a 70-200f2.8 ef lens with adapter which I never use! Lol! Thanks for the video. I do miss my old Sony with clear image zoom- great feature

[@MarcelGlas]

Versatile set for sure! Thanks for watching 🙌

[@IZE_FILMS]

I feel the same way about the 16-35 f4 it’s so underrated.

[@MarcelGlas]

Unfortunately I don't have any hands-on experience with this one but I absolutely agree that too many people overlook the value of f4 lenses!

[@DevAcharya]

The explaination : You got a sub man.seriously appreciate your story telling

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks a lot man! Glad you're here 🙌

[@hoangvn95]

bro that is crazy awsome video. I am so charmed by how you making sound and text title on this. Could u share more how to make the text title like yours

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks man! Grab a nice bold font, add a duplicate layer of the title below the first one and use a gaussian blur effect to create the glow. I also add a film damage overlay set to the Screen blend mode as well as a gate weave effect to make the titlecards move ever so slightly.

[@HoomanBhr]

Love the way you made this video, great job. I recently got Sigma 24-70 mark II and I love it so much. the bokeh and low light capability is two big factor that separate smart phone vs mirrorless cameras especially on social medias which uploaded videos low bitrate won't show that much sharpness of cameras. so I decided to have F2.8 on my priority for choosing a zoom lens. maybe I'd buy a 85 f1.4 in future as well.

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks! Yeah, the Sigma is without a doubt another great lens to consider. 🙌

[@commonprecisionaz]

Now this is helpful content! New subscriber. Thank for making this professional think about his kit choices.

[@MarcelGlas]

Happy top help! Thank you for being here!

[@schoeferfilm]

Great video Marcel 👍🏻 trotzdem auch ohne parfocal liebe ich das alte 24-105 f4 😉

[@MarcelGlas]

Zweifelsohne auch ein großartiges Objektiv! Habe lange zwischen den beiden geschwankt. Dann geht's einfach nur darum die eigene Arbeit und die eigenen Anforderungen einzuschätzen. :)

[@bencebuzek]

Veryveeery well told, thanks mate, it helped a lot, great aspects

[@MarcelGlas]

And thank you for taking the time to watch!

[@josuastangl7140]

Great and very useful video, subscribed!

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks man! Willkommen 🙌😄

[@Johsua_v]

SUBBED! Gonna sell my sigma 24-70 2.8 and get this lens. My eyes are ruined from seeing the version 2 and I don't have money for GM2 lol. Astounding work and thank you for making a video on this that no one talks about. Gonna use extra money for lighting gear, a rig/ gimbal, and hopefully get another cam solely for video or low light. Thank you again for dropping the keys

[@MarcelGlas]

You're very welcome! Hope this setup will serve you well 😌 Spending some money on lighting equipment is also usually an even better investment than buying the newest camera gear. Great idea! 🙌

[@webcastdude]

My Sony camera has 5 stops of IBIS, so f/4 is no problem. This lens lives on my camera practically 24/7. The 20mm is great to have 👍

[@MarcelGlas]

Glad you enjoy it as much as I do!

[@ese.studios]

challenged my perspective, great video

[@MarcelGlas]

That's what I was hoping to achieve. Thanks for watching!

[@aladdinswunderlampe]

Amazing video in any aspect - congrats! How do you achive this depth in your shoots? The footage is incredible! 💖

[@MarcelGlas]

Thank you very much! Depth is all about layering. I often compose my shots in a way where I have a visible foreground layer. This could be people, plants, even furniture. Lighting is also very important since it gives people or objects dimensionality. Best part is, most of this light is... well... free. :D

[@JeffCorcelius]

Nice Vid, I shoot F4-5.6 way more than I do F 2.8 and below. Thats why I want to get the Sony E PZ 18-110mm f/4 G OSS Lens (I shoot with an FX30)

[@MuhammadIhsan390]

I rented this lens last week and was blown away by its performance!

[@MarcelGlas]

I've heard about this lens just recently. Very curious to hear what you think. If you can affoard to have a larger and heavier setup, this might be a great choice!

[@ChimeThinker]

i 100% agree!!! Bokeh is for someone who doesn't work on sets or utlize environments!

[@JaimeDelRio]

This was a great video and kept my attention the whole way through. GREAT JOB. LOVED IT. Also... I didn't even know that the 20-70 f4 lens existed. Thank You.

[@MarcelGlas]

You're welcome Jaime! There is more to come soon. :)

[@kushaalprasad2178]

I have the 24-70 f4 carl Zeiss. I just needed something for interview shoots and few other stuff. Sometimes i use my friend's 24-70 2.8 and like the more sharpness and depth it adds but most of the everyday stuff gets covered.

[@MarcelGlas]

You can add so much more to a scene by controlling the light or doing a bit of set design that an extra stop of light really isn't that important. 🙌

[@LorenzKami]

Junge was 1 Brett. Geil gemacht!

[@MarcelGlas]

Grazie man 🙌

[@angelomoises2016]

genuine question. Is the 24-105 just as good as the 20-70? and would you choose the 24-105 over the tamron 28-75 considering you took the 20-70 over the tamron. i’m so close to buying either of these lenses so i need opinion

[@MarcelGlas]

All three lenses are great in my opinion. Personally I vastly prefer the 20-70 over the other two though. The image from the 24-105 isn't as sharp as the 20-70's and it has worse performance when it comes to chromatic abberation. The 20-70 also has superior AF performance, is smaller and lighter. Both Sony lenses have superior image stabilization compared to the Tamron but the 24-105's optical steady shot isn't necessary for the work I do, so it's not a factor for me. Like I've said in the video, the 20mm at the wide end is a game changer for my projects since I don't need to get a dedicated wide angle lens and can basically do almost anything with my 20-70. The 24-105's zoom range also isn't as clear of a winner to me since I can crop in on the 20-70 with clear image zoom. Hope this helps!

[@richardgmisoles]

We’ll explained.. well done, great video 🎉 Subscribed to you..

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks a lot Richard and welcome! 🙌

[@suvajeetdatta1220]

I've found the holy trinity for Sony APSC Sigma 10-18 Tamron 17-70 Sony 70-350 (+ Ttartisan 27mm for street photography)

[@MarcelGlas]

Unfortunately I can't comment on APS-C lenses but it sounds like this can definitely cover everything you'd need!

[@LetsTakePicsG]

Amazing video Marcel you definitely earned my sub!!!! Question, how would you compare this to your other video about the tamron 20-40mm f/2.8? Wondering if I should get this 20-70mm f/4 or get the tamron 20-40mm f/2.8 with a like 85mm prime?

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks a lot friend! I really like the Tamron because it's tiny and perfect for travel. However, if you're asking me about professional use I'd recommend the 20-70mm f/4 without a doubt. The 20-70 has significantly better auto focus, smoother bokeh, way better stabilization (due to being a first party lens), it's still small and light and offers a more useful zoom range for most situations. That said it is clearly more expensive. If you can afford it or plan to make money with it, the 20-70mm will likely suit you better. If you want something small for travel or for fun, the Tamron is a good option.

[@fabiojock]

Thanks a lot, now I want to buy one :)

[@MarcelGlas]

🫶

[@EstudioHelios]

I relate to you on so many levels

[@MarcelGlas]

🫶

[@andresabrigo7891]

Gran lente! La única desventaja es que es difícil sacarlo de mi cámara.

[@Jmarzphotography]

Loved the video thanks

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks for watching! ✌️

[@TyroneLT]

I just want to say this video was well put together. 👏 👏

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks a lot Tyrone. Happy that you found it enjoyable!

[@kalanilin]

super well made video! subbed

[@MarcelGlas]

Happy to have you here!

[@ruff1draft]

I use the Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-F4 on my Nikon D5500 and it's my most used lens

[@MarcelGlas]

Great zoom range!

[@SNEHRATHORE]

i got a 18-105mm f4 sony lens and its great

[@kanilautis796]

What a great vid! subscribed!

[@MarcelGlas]

Thank you so much and welcome!

[@frankfountain7680]

Fantastic! Subscribed!

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks a ton and welcome!

[@joshuachubbphotography]

Great video. Now I’m wishing I would have kept my 20-70 instead of the 24-50 lol

[@MarcelGlas]

I bet the 24-50 is a great lens. Really only comes down to what you wanna use the equipment for and how flexible you need to be. 🙌

[@saxophonicmusician]

Thanks for the video. I have been looking for a zoom range lens, the only other lens that I am still looking at is the Tamron 17-70mm 2.8 lens which is cheaper in price still. I am thinking of selling my other 2 lenses and keeping the Sigma 30mm 1.4 for closer shots and getting a zoom lens. 👍

[@MarcelGlas]

You're very welcome! An important thing to note is that the Tamron is an APS-C lens while the Sony 20-70 is full frame. Depending on your current camera setup this might make the decision easier for you.

[@saxophonicmusician]

@@MarcelGlas I have the Sony ZVE10 1st gen camera so it's an APSC. Would the Sony 20-70 still be good on the Sony ZVE10?

[@MarcelGlas]

@@saxophonicmusician If you don't intend to eventually move over to a full frame camera I would advise against this as FF lenses are usually significantly more expensive

[@saxophonicmusician]

@@MarcelGlas thanks!

[@ArturoIzurieta]

Once again, another truly incredible video of yours. This format is so well crafted and appreciated; such an easy watch all the way through!

[@MarcelGlas]

Thank you Artur! Happy you liked it 🙌

[@simhawk3986]

WOW! what a video.. Well done.... Just subbed

[@MarcelGlas]

🙌😊

[@oluakinode]

Wow! Subscribed! Whats your color grading process

[@MarcelGlas]

Welcome! My process has changed a lot. It involves Split Toning, a lot of Curve Adjustments, using LUTs and generally pulling the exposure of the images way down. Bit too complicated to explain it quickly haha

[@oluakinode]

@@MarcelGlas wow! Well done man! You videos look exceptional. Nothing like anything I’ve seen. Please make a color grading tutorial soon. Best wishes

[@MarcelGlas]

@@oluakinode Thanks a ton man! 🫶

[@AdamInside]

Brother i just subscribed this is incredible

[@MarcelGlas]

Thank you Adam! Glad you liked it 🙌

[@WizZarDHouSeRecorDs]

very insightful

[@MarcelGlas]

Glad it was helpful!

[@blainemitchell]

How did you get those macro shots with that lens and the clear image zoom? I have some coins I would like to shoot, but I can't get that close unless I use my phone.

[@MarcelGlas]

Hey Blaine! Some of these shots were created with Close-up diopters and others with the more professional NiSi Close-up lens. If you're interested in learning more you may wanna check out the detailed comparison video on both products I recently did.

[@Jona]

Wildes Video, von wo bist du?

[@MarcelGlas]

Grazie ✌️ komme aus Baden-Württemberg

[@Jona]

@@MarcelGlas nice, bin aus Würzburg

[@Marine_0317]

Question: Does the same apply to Photographers?

[@MarcelGlas]

In general, yes it does. However it is highly dependant on the type of photography you're doing so a general answer wouldn't be too useful

[@rrs6509]

20-70 is the best that can be!) 99% of shooting only on 20-70 and 1% on G Master fix

[@MarcelGlas]

Totally agree!

[@VersatileBeatsArunSharma]

Why didn't you discuss Tamron 17-70 2.8??

[@MarcelGlas]

Because it's an APS-C lens and not full frame ✌️

[@saeedrouhani9806]

Genius thanks for share

[@MarcelGlas]

You're welcome!

[@arkliuchannel2913]

Great video! Makes me more confident to get a 20-70 G for sure. All of information and feedback are helpful. Subscribe already,thx!

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks man! Sometimes we just need a little reminder that the gear we already have can be pushed even further 👏

[@pedrogzc]

What do you think for an APSC camera like the A6700? Everyone is talking wonderful about the sigma 17-50 2.8 contemporary

[@MarcelGlas]

Unfortunately I can't give you any input on the A6700. I've heard a lot of good things about it but never had the opportunity to test it myself.

[@GarfieldGuy]

Bravo coaie , am privit pana la final…..se intampla rar treaba asta

[@SAPIENSTALKS-y1g]

Subscribed ! ❤

[@MarcelGlas]

Thank you and welcome!

[@vijaychitte6921]

THE ONLY BENEFIT OF G MASTER LENSES IS IF YOU ASK BIRDS THAT YOU HAVE GOT GMASSTER LENSES TO TAKE PICTURES IN THE JUNGLE THEY WILL START POSING IN FRONT OF YOUR CAMERA...

[@alvinbartolome1239]

So its a 20/70 F4 and a 35/1.8 for you for videos. Cool.

[@MarcelGlas]

Exactly. Depending on the project I may also use a modded Helios 44-2 or Super Takumar 28mm vintage lens but I've decided to minimize my lens collection as much as possible.

[@alvinbartolome1239]

@@MarcelGlas tbh, add another camera plus an 85/1.8 and its a great photo and video using 3 light and small lenses sans GMaster

[@abeylabeyl]

Great video. What would be good for an apsc then?

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks a lot! Unfortunately I don't have any hands-on experience with any of the APSC lenses so I won't give any recommendations

[@iamJoshPayne]

🔥 video.

[@MarcelGlas]

Thanks man!

[@Blckswt]

Totally agree 🤌

[@MarcelGlas]

🙌🙌🙌

[@sentralent1850]

Is the Sony 24-105mm F4 Parfocal?

[@MarcelGlas]

No, it's not. Just as the other competitors it will try to compensate with AF but results can be unreliable.

[@sentralent1850]

@@MarcelGlas Thank you!

[@wzk921109]

I use the 24-105, it’s good for 95% of the time.

[@MarcelGlas]

Great lens for sure!

[@ChimeThinker]

Is the Tamron 17-50 F4 parfocal?

[@MarcelGlas]

Unfortunately I have no hands-on experience with this lens. From what I can find it doesn't appear to be parfocal but I'm not 100% sure.

[@88realestategroup5]

Dude you should more views in this video

[@MarcelGlas]

Thank you!

[@nagendrakumar6487]

does it lag focus when fx3 set to 120 frames

[@MarcelGlas]

I shoot in a PAL region so I am only using it at 100fps but there are no issues at all. Haven't encountered anyone who said this was an issue at 120fps so I'd bet you're gonna be good 🙌

[@Johsua_v]

Okay so I've been looking around online and apparently this lens isn't a true parfocal. For clear image zoom maybe it looks like that but for the actual zoom ring ive been seeing it go out of focus but the shift back to focus is very quick

[@MarcelGlas]

Check Gerald Undone's review for this. If you have autofocus enabled while zooming even a parfocal lens may jump a bit, depending on the situation. Testing for parfocalness is done in manual focus. And my copy, just as Gerald's shows the same results. Hope this helps 🙌

[@Johsua_v]

@@MarcelGlas goated fr 🐐 I go watch. you shoulda said that in the vid bro, flame every single one of these creators just glazing details and regurgitating the specs. Greatly appreciate it brotha it’s tough out here

[@MarcelGlas]

@@Johsua_v 👌😂

[@Realist-m9c]

24-105 is stabilised, that’s really important for FX6 users.

[@MarcelGlas]

Depending on the kind of work you do and whether you want a handheld look or not, this can be an important thing to consider, agreed. 🙌

[@shweshwa9202]

Me using the 24-70 GMII and when I tried 50mm 1.2 I wanted that for the light sensitivity... 4? no way!!!

[@MarcelGlas]

Well this is exactly the point I was talking about in the video, no? People are looking at their lenses out of context but if you own a slower zoom lens as well as a fast prime lens for low light shots, you can film just about anything. This doesn't mean that the zoom lens has to have a fast aperture as well.

[@STGFilmmakers]

no VC no ty :P imo the 17-70mmf2.8 is a much better value with VC

[@MarcelGlas]

17-70mm is an APS-C lens though. Completely different case

[@luvgandhi]

1:02 😂😂😂😂

[@sqlevolicious]

Nah, the new 24-50 f2.8 is far better.

[@MarcelGlas]

Care to elaborate on your statement?

[@Paul-by1cm]

20-70 is not parfocal

[@MarcelGlas]

I've heard varying reports on this. Watch Gerald Undone's review where he tested the lens for parfocalness. My copy performs the exact same during manual focus.

[@cokrlicix]

I'm glad you were able to find gear that suits your needs, and it's quite obvious that you are relatively new in this occupation (that comment about watching movies is a glaring example) but you need to relax, dude. You "discovered" one of the most used focal lengths from one of the most popular brands, and the thing about Soviet lenses is widely known for a decent amount of years now. No need to be so over the top with your "discoveries". Because as time passes, you will learn more and more things, and when you get to a certain point, you will become aware that there is so much more to learn, so much that you don't know. The more i know, the more i realize i know nothing, that's how the saying goes. Point being, you made few findings that work for you, great. Don't let hubris get the better of you, as soon you start thinking how perfect your work is, that's the moment your decline starts. In this work, you can always do better, and there is always someone better.

[@MarcelGlas]

Something in this video got you on an emotional level, else you wouldn't have taken the time to write a lengthy comment like this. Not sure what made you believe I view my opinions as facts or why I'd need to "relax" after offering an alternative perspective on gear which isn't driven by monetary gain, unlike the majority of filmmaking KZbin. Also not sure why you reiterate the word "discoveries" as if I had presented my points as some hidden truths. Then again, ironic to be accusing people of hubris while simultaneously implying you've got all the answers.

[@fabiojock]

You clearly didn’t get the point of the video. Maybe you should watch it again…

[@cokrlicix]

@@MarcelGlas It was a well intentioned advice, becouse I worked with people like you who got intengled in their own "greatness" and before you know it all that great turns to sh... but they cant't recognize that becouse they are sure they know everything. And judging by your reply that is path you have choosen. I felt sorry for you Kid, all that becouse you found one lens that works for you...and if you are able to read my point was excatly the opposite of knowing all the answers. Anyway do as you please.

[@MarcelGlas]

@@cokrlicix I don't question your intentions, I question your tone. Assuming you've worked with "people like me" after having watched one video on the internet. Calling me "kid" or "feeling sorry for me". Once more, I'm not sure how you come up with these accusations of "greatness" but you've clearly had some sour experiences with people in the past which you now project on me.

[@nativestrong7253]

You have to be color blind in some way to find these colors even remotely acceptable for professional work.

[@MarcelGlas]

Be my guest and tell my paying clients.

[@GlassfilmWeddings]

meh. GM primes way better imo.

[@MarcelGlas]

I'm sure you have your reasons. The way you phrased this didn't exactly add anything to the discussion though.