Hey Mr. P! What was the reason you didn't add the acceleration vectors for parts u and both
@joanferreira38963 жыл бұрын
Thank you again Prof.
@alyssamenezes954 ай бұрын
I have a question. Wouldn't the acceleration of part two u change because you dropped the camera and therefore decreased in mass? The mass total would be lighter and therefore the acceleration would increase because the force from the jetpacks stayed constant. Or in this problem are we assuming that the camera has no mass? Thank you so much for the amazing videos though!!!
@joudyrehan36404 сағат бұрын
The acceleration is independant of mass! During free fall, mass is irrelevant
@surajkrojha13429 жыл бұрын
for part 2 camera BO said 52.5+(-9.81)(5) and mr.P wrote 52.5+(-9.81)(5)^2 o_O!! WELL IS IT A MISTAKE OR I M SOMEWHERE WRONG??? equation is also diffrent
@FlippingPhysics9 жыл бұрын
suraj kr ojha You are correct that there is a mistake @ 7:26, however, you have the mistake reversed. The typo is on the board. The change in time is not squared in the equation. Sorry for the confusion and thanks for letting me know. I have added an annotation to point out the error.
@science1878 Жыл бұрын
why does the second(last) answer have only 2 sig figs
@Charlessen9 жыл бұрын
This video is "flipping" cool
@FlippingPhysics9 жыл бұрын
HumdrumCheetah7 Thanks! :)
@shauryasingh95532 жыл бұрын
@Flipping Physics Why is the acceleration in the first part of the problem taken as 10.5 m/s^2? The jetpack has an acceleration of 10.5m/s^2 but at the same time the gravitational acceleration is 9.81 m/s^2 so shouldn't the net acceleration be 10.5-9.81 = 0.69m/s^2
@parvinder93734 жыл бұрын
Why initial velocity is taken zero
@shaima34454 жыл бұрын
the initial velocity of the object before moving(or at start) is taken as zero since it has zero kinetic energy. When the body is at rest and it starts moving. initial velocity is equal to zero(u=0),only when the object starts from rest.