🚨Don't miss this one: Wilson Pro Staff Six.One 95 tennis racquet review: classic feel & precision

[@James-qv1dr]

I liked the new format. It came across as really professional and high quality. However, the production quality of the older videos had a more personal feel and felt less like a commercial.

[@Raven05R6]

I really like the new format, especially how it makes comparison between reviewers opinions easier with how it is segmented. The music was too commercial feeling and I could do without it, less of it, or at least a lower volume.

[@dunsdonjone1537]

yeah its more informative, longer, and more natural/organic. The previous format felt so regimented, scripted, and robotic; felt like something that was made by PR firms instead of tennis enthusiasts.

[@alexcortez3007]

Never thought Wilson would bring this racquet back. Glad they’re still catering to the 95 player base.

[@Stu49583]

Don't know why brands are scared to offer anything below 97. Are people really thinking they would hit only the frame with a sub 95 racket? I play best with a 93sq Prestige Mid, definitely not more difficult to play with than the larger 98-100s.

[@kabob21]

@@Stu49583 It’s not a matter of hitting the frame. With a smaller head, there’s a small sweet spot and thus less forgiveness on off center shots

[@Stu49583]

@@kabob21 That smaller sweet spot is more consistent and precise though. There is reason why we don't play with 137sq frames

[@gnerd07]

yes yes yes & yes. This format feels so much more comprehensive. Properly segmented and everyone gives their 2 cents on each segment. Comparisons to the old racquet described and the specs shown graphically. Absolutely love it

[@bcccangel]

"I can really feel where my balls were" - Chris Digging the new format 👍🏻

[@mauricioreginato]

that was so funny man

[@hxhky]

Really like the new format. Aligns better with the written review. Whereas old format is more freestyle, where I really have to filter and look for those pieces of info like control/power/spin/etc.

[@therealdavidleong]

Agree, and chapter markers would make it even better

[@tenniswarehouse]

I can work on adding in chapters to help! KZbin is supposed to auto-chapter now! But it seems to take more than a few days! Michelle, TW

[@stewpatterson1369]

could watch tennis on this beaitful background all day

[@b.lakeberg7456]

The new format is appealing with breaking down the review into categories and have each playtester give thier perspective on the category. I enjoyed how the new graphics looked. It made seeing the racquet info easier. Great music! This updated review format was perfect for a classic racquet.

[@PLRNZOO]

I really enjoyed the new format. It was easy to follow and more digestible than the former. Made sense from a content standpoint. Also enjoyed the moments of levity and leaving in some off the cuff dialogue and laughs. This helped keep it natural and personable which i think resonated with me as one of the many who have been watching you all the over the years. The old format is endearing, but you all are on the right track to make it better than before. Keep refining, i think it’s close-find the right balance of keeping the reviews high quality, digestible, and personable and you guys will have a winning new format.

[@ronmutnjakovic3437]

Keep this format. The only thing I would change is in the beginning, show the racquet closeups a few seconds longer along with the specs so you can read them and see the stick without having to pause or rewind lol. Thanks guys!!

[@d0min0danc1ng]

Tennis Warehouse.. I love these guys! I've always had the best experience shopping with them.

[@-Munditimum-]

Wow, next level format and quality. Wow. Always love seeing content from you guys. The product presentations are just a bonus! Cheers! M

[@EP-77o]

Interesting edit. I guess it mirrors the written reviews a bit more. Which makes sense. Would love to see Wilson offer the old 16x18 again.

[@joeabib]

All I want for Christmas, is... a remake of the 6.1 95 Classic. 80% graphite, %20 kevlar, no fancy materials technology bullshit (n-code, k-factor, blx, etc. etc. etc.), and a 16x18 spring pattern. That's it; nothing else other than that sweet orange, yellow, and black paint job!

[@snodahsc]

New format is great! Interesting to hear in-depth feedback from players with different styles and those who have used previous models of the PS.

[@WaltKurtz68]

I recently blew the dust off of my original Pro Staff Classic 6.1 16x18 and had it strung with Velocity MLT 1.25 at 20kg (44 lbs). I also replaced the 30 years old Fairway leather grip with a fresh new Hydrosorb Pro. Excellent choice ! If swingweight, plowthrough an stability are important to you then either get your Pro Staff Classic 6.1 down from the attic, get a Head Prestige Tour, OR check out THIS new Pro Staff 6.1 95! That is if you live in the USA. TW hasn't (yet?) made it available in Europe so far.

[@tenniswarehouse]

We wish it were as easy as TW making it available but unfortunately, often with racquet, footwear and even apparel brands, the availability of products can differ between regions and there are different offerings that aren't always available world wide. Our Europe team has asked Wilson if they can bring it in but unfortunately at this time, they haven't been able to get stock. Fingers crossed that changes in the future! But we love that you got the Pro Staff Classic out for a hit! So fun! Michelle, TW

[@johnluu83]

this new style is breath of fresh air imo. it feels like the reviews from the playtesters seem to be wayy more personal and more honest which I prefer.

[@promotry6934]

more organized. this is the perfect start of this new format on this all time classic racquet.

[@WaltKurtz68]

Now I hear a number of play testers specifically mentioning this is the 18x20 version. Does that imply there's also going to be a 16x18 (or 19) version like with the original Pro Staff Classic 6.1? I still have one of both. Just weighed the 16x18 and it's 333 grams unstrung. So very close to the V14. As soon as Wilson releases a glossy all black version (like the Pro Labs one) I'm seriously gonna consider this racquet! Thanks guys.

[@zeroelus]

Liked the format. As a relative newcomer to these reviews, it gave me what I wanted and moved at a nice pace. Regarding the racquet itself, I still have (and play with about half the time) with an nCode six one 95 16x18. so I'm happy Wilson keeps cranking these older school models out, PWS and all. That ncode and this v14 one have a very similar stiffness rating (I wonder if they are related), and it's one of the reasons I still use it, that plus some multifilament strings make it very comfy. And my impression is the same regarding the weight, it doesn't seem heavy, esp, comparing it to something like a pure drive 100 which is what I play with the other half of the time, and that strung and with the same grips and overgrips the 6.1 outweighs the PD by some 20 ish grams. If Wilson came out with a 16x18, I'd happily retire my one of the nice ncodes I'm saving for when my "beater" frame finally gives up.

[@Nadu16]

Loved the new format, its production is top notch. Also love the notations throughout the video with important information

[@craignelson5689]

I like the new format y'all! Very professional finish on the vid, but there was still plenty of personality from the group. I think the by-category review does a good job ensuring that each reviewer provides a full set of feedback, rather than focusing on one aspect over others. Keep them coming!

[@markhansen9731]

Bravo on a nice refresh to the format. I can go either way on organizing the reviews by categories or by the play-tester. No argument against the attempt to chunk the review into smaller sections and bring in some more graphics. In any case, always appreciate the context and thoughtfulness in T-Dub reviews.

[@Blocher117]

Great job with the new editing format. Makes it way easier/funner to watch/pay attention to.

[@10nishobby75]

format was good, but the racquet stole the show! well done TW, keep up the great work! long time fan!

[@JV-py3lg]

New format is refreshing

[@clarencelim212]

Love the new laid back presentation. Laid back yet professional.

[@christianolsson834]

Love the new format! Not that the old one was bad, more that the new one feels fresh and clean but still unmistakably TW!

[@davidglasgow4199]

Whipability! I do like the new format. Like the new graphics and mixing up playtester comments by test category. Good to keep the content fresh!

[@christon.stevens4898]

New format is excellent guys

[@javierjimenez786]

Refreshing format! Also, that tennis court is gorgeous!!

[@blopauru766]

Loved the new format!!! Thank you for the great reviews TW !!

[@hmdayrit]

I like the new format. Sometimes different playtesters say the same things and this new format condenses the opinions and avoids repetitions.

[@tonymcbroom5252]

Loved the new format!

[@tenniswarehouse]

Glad to hear it!

[@ginofellino89]

Great new format, much more comprehensive , Great work guys and all the best 💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼

[@shrirham489]

Love the new format!

[@malcolmsmith6016]

Great new format ... pops along nicely. KEEP IT!!!

[@richard141724]

I like this new format. Thank you.

[@vladzubac5360]

absolutely love the new video format!!!!

[@garethward5010]

New format is definitely better! Way more information gathered! Keep them coming like this!

[@WaltKurtz68]

To Michelle, as you mentioned your RF97 is discontinued and you'll eventualy have to look for a replacement, how do you compare this Pro Staff 6.1 95 to the Head Prestige Tour? I remember you were super positive about the 2021 edition, with the hefty swing weight and head light balance and all. Which of these two do you like best?

[@tenniswarehouse]

Correct. The biggest difference for me is the handle/pallet shape...having used a Wilson for so long, this one feels right in my hands. I still struggle a tiny bit with the more oval Head pallet. Also, yes, loved that Prestige Tour...didn't like the update as much. and haven't hit it in a while but the Head frames that have been in heavier rotation for me is the Radical Pro and Gravity Pro (mod'd up spec though!). I just don't think I need to go DOWN in head size...but this racquet definitely didn't play like a 95 square inch frame in my opinion. Michelle, TW

[@WaltKurtz68]

@@tenniswarehouse Thanks very much. That is very interesting. I've watched a number of reviews all saying the 2023 update is so close to the 2021 it's hardly worth "upgrading to" the new Prestige Tour, but if I am reading this correctly you don't agree. Maybe I should stock up on the 2021 while they're still out there 🤔. I don't know if the Prestige Tour has the more rectangular TK82 pallets but if it does maybe you could swap 'em out to TK82S pallets. Or try the Prestige Pro. That one already has the TK82S pallets (at least mine does). Happy hunting! PS yes, Radical Pro with some lead at 3&9 and under the grip plays very well! Cheers!

[@brandomaxwell]

I'm guessing you're on the Continent,@@WaltKurtz68, bc the 2021 Tours are all but gone in the states. If so, get 'em while you can. Word is, the initial batch averaged 338sw, and the rebatch ~331; which sold well enough that Head kept its 315g, 31.5cm, 330sw specs for the 2023. So, depending on the batch your 2021s are from, you could maybe get an identical 2023 but for the flex drop from 65 to 62 RA. And, yes, still TK82S. "The horror! The horror!" Sorry, that was more about your handle than the Tour's; I couldn't resist...🧐

[@WaltKurtz68]

@@brandomaxwell Interesting. I got my first one early march 2023 and my second one late november, but I only just got racquet 2 back from the stringer! I'll try it asap next week but now you've got me wondering how far these may be apart swing weight wise...

[@WaltKurtz68]

@@brandomaxwell I prefer TK82 too, but I don't mind TK82S that much. If you hate TK82S you could buy a grip size smaller than normal and make the pallets thicker only on the sides so that you create a more rectangular grip shape. I put thin strips of hard plastic on the bevels of the pallets, firmly tape 'em on there and then reapply the racquet's basegrip. I do all bevels but of course you could do only the left and right ones. Could be worth a try. Or try it first on an older racquet to see if you like the resulting grip shape (and size).

[@12GaugePadawan]

New format was super dope! 🔥😃

[@kevinnguyen9596]

Best review format ever!

[@golpherguy6388]

New format is a big step forward. No going back now. 👍🏻👍🏻

[@mm93249]

Great video and new format! How does it compare to the Boom Pro ‘24?

[@tenniswarehouse]

The Boom Pro is a bit easier to maneuver, and provides easier access to power and spin. This SIx One 95 is more solid, has a heftier feel, and provides more precision. Troy, TW

[@paulperaza798]

New format is great and with this dream classic Pro Staff even makes it better. Maybe trying different courts and surfaces as well as different balls will make it even more appealing

[@rocksuper1147]

New format ROCKS!!!!

[@raidersofsteak2227]

Nice review loved the one on one interview of the old reviews

[@gnaca47]

Love the new format 👏🏽

[@vnishpt7036]

Is TW going to post a review of this stick (w/ratings) on the TW website? If not, how would TW play-testers say this one compares to the Head Pro Tour 2.0 in terms of feel (other than the comparable specs)?

[@QawiemJamil]

love the improved presentation. I like how the use of measurements are now presented at the same time. Comparisons with other models was a great touch too. While I love getting each one's perspective, it does get difficult synthesize somewhat. I think a quick summary at the end that collates all common opinions would be great. Obviously, not everyone will have the same opinion so I think each presenter's key traits can be mentioned as well to give context. Perhaps things like current racket of choice, play style, swing style - these can help me relate to the presenters better and would give me an idea of how much weight I should give to each presenter's opinion. Keep up the great work! Ya'll are killing it.

[@renatoyap]

I'm adding " whipability " to my vocab now... those potatoes looks like a high whipability factor

[@aubreypwd]

Like the format! Very informative!

[@yarivfreed1098]

Enjoyed the new format - thanks

[@donaldchambers2988]

Hi Guys. Great review @tenniswarehouse. Comprehensive format. Love it. Think it would also be great if you left in each players perspective on how it feels per different stroke - one handed backhand, serve, etc. I went on the europe version of your website and could not find the racket. Can you help please. Keep up the great work. Cheers, Don.

[@Mewborne89]

This style is way better IMO. Also, demoed this racquet and loved it! The only downside was I would have preferred a 16x19 version instead just for those days I’m not at 100 percent. Great looking stick too.

[@ellistai]

I like the new format too. Getting outdoor and seeing the sunlight make everything much more lively. Quick question: so the two six.one 95, v13 & v14, are actually different in spec? I thought there was only paint job update. Thanks!

[@tenniswarehouse]

I believe the target specs are supposed to be the same, however these were the average measures specs we took in house, once we had a few samples strung for testing. I think the biggest thing we noticed was the flex rating being a bit lower with this v14. However, the swingweight and weight can fluctuate quite a bit in a given batch of racquets, no matter which version it is, and that is why we offer racquet matching services if requested, when purchasing racquets from us. Troy, TW

[@tomathome77]

Great new format btw!!!!

[@leoooomoney]

This place is beautiful! Where is it filmed?

[@tenniswarehouse]

On the Central Coast of California!

[@enriqueburgos3659]

great work!! 👍

[@JeffreySkinner-t8u]

I think it would be interesting to have a comparison with the Head Prestige Tour 95 since they have many similarities.

[@bounce_hit3534]

The slice sound effects! 🔪

[@DJDJ-qi6wr]

Agree with other comment. Older video formats better. The old ones with Andy and co where you had playsight data were amazing. The BMS racquet reviews work well, to the point with great honest insight. These new ones are ok, but it does feel like an ad, and looks like every other youtuber putting fancy graphics, music, headings etc. The written reviews are great for that (old scoring on the TW page was better also, love that format)

[@alfandosavant4639]

I prefer the previous format, except for the racquet specs information. This kind of racquet specs information is well-framed into 2 frames of video, where i can get any information about the racquet. The playtest however, i love the previous style because it's full of highlights and based on how deep/spinny/powerful the racquet based on my observation. Does a racquet hits deep on average?

[@hingemethod5938]

so much better. well done. seems that this racket is very similar if not identical almost to the prince phantom 93p

[@tenniswarehouse]

Some similarities to the 93P 18x20, but this one is a bit firmer and packs a little more punch or energy return. The 93P 18x20 feels a bit softer and has a slightly thinner beam; so maybe a bit more comfort and feel. Troy, TW

[@experientialtennispickleball]

This longer format is much better. Having recently played the Wilson BLX Six.One 95 18x20, I'd make sure to whom this racket is oriented and just add that on one hand it's not a viable option for intermediate to make a full switch to it, since it's quite heavy and demands long takeback and big swings, but on the other hand, it's one of those rackets you can have fun with hitting for 30 minutes, especially slicing and hitting flat and through.

[@mikeobiwon]

I like the new review format, and don't have anything else to say aside from what's already said by others in the Comments section. I do have one question, though. Do you know if Wilson has any plans to make a 16x18 or 16x19 version of this Six.One 95? I think I know the answer already, but just thought I'd ask. Thanks, and keep up the great work!

[@markbrodeur1707]

I enjoyed the new format. I do miss the format where it compared the subject frame to the playtesters personal racquet. As someone with a long tennis history of playing every size and weight from the Dunlop Fort to my 2019 Prestige Tour, I wonder if going smaller and heavier brings any advantages. Hate the rust color. Black please.

[@zumzool]

Feels more corporate feeling but I like the inset picture and breaking down the different areas.

[@edwardstilwell9252]

I also enjoyed the New Format was much more informative about the racket ... also did you use new camera equipment? The video quality seemed much better more contrast and color noticed!

[@phillip391984]

Awesome format. More information than before when you split different categories like spin, feel etc. The old format has been there almost 25 years, since Chris was doing racket review in TW. So its about time for change and changes is welcome. It would be nice if you tell us also how its to play the racket with different string setup like multifilament, polyester and natural gut combo, the game change a lot and it will help users maybe to find a good setup easier and faster. Granville should be on this review, that must be the gem of tennis racket for him, thats the only minus for this review

[@jayp123]

Wonder if they will release the Prostaff 90s

[@BriceBriceBabyy]

New format is good but would be great to have a specific section on both serves and volleys

[@rogerzwaterzs]

@tenniswarehouse is there any way to get this racquet delivered to Canada?

[@tenniswarehouse]

I don't believe so, as we are restricted from shipping Wilson product outside of the US. -TW Staff

[@youtubisorpa]

@tenniswarehouse, will this be available in Europe as well?

[@ommpaloomplak53]

When is the blade pro coming out for sale on tw?

[@michaelp9061]

Was this the Del Potro frame that was a pro lab only product ? Super glad to see it is available. Will you carry the blade pros as well ?

[@michaelp9061]

Thanks !

[@upgradeyourtennis1790]

I enjoyed it as TW has consistently been the benchmark for as long as i can remember on KZbin for reviews but the constant fancy transition graphics can make it bit dizzying. Also I kind of just want to see them walk out and see how the ball flies off the racquet to get a good gauge if its going to suit my game or not. Slow mo, then chop and change scenes gets a bit annoying. That's just me.

[@justoo8811]

@Tennis Warehouse love the new video format! @Troy TW I was wondering how does this v14 6.1 95 compares to the v13 version? Does it play the same (just new cosmetic)? or does it have a different feel completely? Thank you!

[@tenniswarehouse]

I don't think it plays all that much different, however I do like the feel and "whipability" of this v14 haha. On the ones that we spec'd it seems as thought the stiffness is bit lower with the v14, which I enjoy. Also, the swingweight seems to be a bit lower on average, helping with maneuverability, and for those that want more swingweight a quick fix with a little weight tape. The v13 did feel a bit firmer and a bit heftier on the swingweight, however I didn't spec as many of the v13 racquets as I did with the v14; as I was digging through our stock for matching pairs. Troy, TW

[@martinrosemary5654]

I saw some review of this racquet from a year ago, is this the same racquet or a new release?

[@shabzone]

nice format

[@larayhanhaddy336]

where is this court on the video?

[@tenniswarehouse]

On the Central Coast of California! Pretty perfect, right?! Michelle, TW

[@larayhanhaddy336]

@@tenniswarehouse it's beautiful! I'm from Indonesia by the way, hope I can play there sometimes! ☺

[@landonschaefer]

How does this v14 compare to the v13 that came out about 1.5 years to 2 years ago? I thought the v13 had a hollow feel and a bit wobbly.

[@bounce_hit3534]

I like it. I feel like we are watching a written review where you focus on categories and not play testers

[@AbigailJrney-1]

So basically this is the same racquet as the older red & black BLX Six.One 95. My dad owned 4 of those BLXs from back in 2012. He gave me 2 of them brand new. It's a bit hefty that's for sure! But, it's a great racquet.

[@tenniswarehouse]

Yes, definitely a great racquet. Basically the same frame or mold as those older versions but these Pro Labs versions feel a bit better in terms of vibration dampening and comfort. We aren't for certain if they are foam filled, but the feeling is more plush than I recall from the older versions. Troy, TW

[@claudiow1129]

What a beautiful court. Where is it?

[@tenniswarehouse]

San Luis Obispo, CA!😉

[@andresgarcia6337]

What’s the beam size? Is it just as thick as the other pro staff models ?

[@tenniswarehouse]

21 mm, compared to the 21.5 mm of the Pro Staff 97. It is also an oval beam or shaft, whereas the 97 is box beam design. We will have a in depth chat about the Six One racquets in an upcoming podcast, if you'd like to check it out stay tunes as we will post it here on KZbin. Troy, TW

[@Shankar-Bhaskar]

Is this 95 square inch racquet available in a 'lighter L' model?

[@tenniswarehouse]

No, it is only available in this spec (331 grams unstrung). Troy, TW

[@kagakai7729]

It's really close to Djokovic's actual spec so I'll definitely be trying it. I like control.

[@garyhilson7220]

The new format is good. Instead of me going back and forth while viewing the video.

[@melkon1an]

new format is good. I mean this in the best way possible, but it would be much more informative getting input from higher UTR players

[@antoniocamboa7511]

Grommets for this racket, anyone can help??

[@davidmaloney9505]

How can you have a review without Mark starting "I was honored to be chosen for this review..." or Troy saying "I would slap a leather grip on this and weight it up at 10 and 2..." or Chris saying "My slice....". What are you doing TW?

[@bibou929]

Hey TW, is there a multifilament string out there with a very crisp feel ? Thank you

[@tenniswarehouse]

I would say your closest would be Tecnifibre Triax, or Wilson Sensation Control. Troy, TW

[@Bob-hq5lj]

Are you kidding? I love the new format and I know Tennis Warehouse does too so stop sandbagging haha. Seriously congratulations on the aesthetics of the new format.

[@tomathome77]

Is the new format Mark's glasses 🤣??

[@HonkyMonky]

Best stick on the market

[@OldSkoolLegend]

80's disco vibes are always welcome... hehe... and im not even from the 80's.

[@jcvicelli]

A classic racquet for a reason. If only they had the classic painting, or at least in black...

[@MMm-kp7lk]

the old one is black you can find it on wilson pro labs it looks dope

[@kyzersoze.musicology]

Loooooove the new format….

[@emjay2045]

Older format !!!!! 🤚🏽 🔙