Donald Hoffman: Scientist PROVES Why Reality Is False [Simulation Theory]

[@learnhowtostart]

I hope you enjoy today's conversation with Donald Hoffman. - How to enter to win a PS5: like, comment & sub. That's it. Good luck!

[@Gawillamon]

Is the giveaway over? Regardless, I liked and subscribed authentically lol great content!

[@jlstarsound3111]

Donalds ideas are amazing! I already have this idea inside me. I have been hoping to get to the point where I can manipulate the simulation. Unfortunately i am not gifted to see colours etc with numbers yet... 🥳☺️

[@learnhowtostart]

@@jlstarsound3111 Thanks for listening!

[@prosperousmusician419]

Is the PS5 real?🤔

[@learnhowtostart]

​@@prosperousmusician419 Of course. Contest ends final week of June. You can gain enteries on our YT, TikTok &/or IG pages. Right now we about 700 entries total & hope to pass 1000+ entries by the close. 1/1000 (give or take) is a great ratio compared to other giveaway contests you'll see on here. Good luck. Thanks!

[@stonekase]

I guess i am the first African here 🇳🇬🇳🇬🇳🇬 , great video. My dad (now 85 years old) always had this quote that "No entity is capable of seeing the medium it survives in", then he proceeds to give us simple examples of humans survive by breathing AIR so we cannot see AIR, he then says "I think a fish doesnt see water, it might be seeing air as water".I never understood why he always told us that when we were kids.

[@mikebezanson6229]

Why you gotta be an "African" .. seriously.. did anybody else post that they were the first Asian, or white , or Indian? Stop the new nonsense..you're a human being.. just like the rest of us..

[@yourkingdomcomeyourwillbedone]

@@mikebezanson6229 ...sounds like a white guy

[@Amethyst_Friend]

@@mikebezanson6229 Correct, he is a human being from Africa. That's all he said. I think you should look inwards at why it made you uncomfortable. Peace.

[@charliehelyes]

That's a great quote

[@Eazy_Danny]

When I've had direct experience of reality some 6 years ago, there just was pure perceptions - just seeing, just hearing, without nobody who was seeing, no objectifications of what is seen or heard. I was seeing the trees glowing with light from within, everything was very bright as every moment seen with a fresh look. I then realised that what we see is not the real reality, and our true nature is what underlies everything we see as a world. We can experience total presence, in which there's no time, no subject-object, we experience directly awareness, our true nature.

[@maxwellndlovu4461]

You mean like in the movie Avator?

[@farmerjohn6526]

Sounds like LSD. That is just a drug messing with your brain.

[@MH-qk7ls]

Thank you for asking fascinating questions and allowing Don Hoffman to fully answer! I listen to every interview of Don Hoffman for the groundbreaking information and it is refreshing to hear new questions. You are an excellent interviewer!

[@TimoDcTheLikelyLad]

Don Hoffmans theory of concious realism is one of the most sophisticated hypothesis about conciousness at the moment. Space time is the aspect of interaction and interpretation but the basis of reality seems to be a constantly changing realm of infitnite different types of experiences into the unkown. Death is not an end - it is just to ensure a constant wonder in ones life. I would love to know how it is all ordered.

[@learnhowtostart]

Beautifully put. Thanks for supporting the show my friend.

[@silmaramcgarry7053]

Very well said 👏🏻

[@silmaramcgarry7053]

Very well said 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

[@spiralsun1]

That’s the trick. You get it when you say “how it is all ordered” I can say that, and offer an explanation that you seem to be seeking, because I implicitly understand what he shows in the computer models. In my first book 20 years ago I had a chapter on “going beyond our evolutionarily-limited world view” which assumed that people knew what Donald Hoffman shows. For example the narrow band of the electromagnetic spectrum which humans can actually see was one of the examples I used which now is one that a lot of people use. It’s extremely important to understand how the brain works in order to fully transcend what “works” for mere survival-which is why I write that the theory of evolution is pretty much the “keys to the kingdom of heaven” in that regard-the key to transcendence of the “evolutionarily-limited” world-view. Religion speaks of transcending illusion, or things of this world. The idea of sin. All that stuff is what the “program” in your mind can follow and therefore blind you to higher meaning. I show in this regard that humanity is a transitional organism which absolutely was meant to take over its own evolution for just this reason, the blind forces of past evolutionary history cannot otherwise be transcended in a sustainable way. In other words we have no future without conscious careful evolution. We already UNCONSCIOUSLY self select in destructive ways that serve proximal purposes because we in majority don’t see the larger picture. Indeed the wages of sin is death, and global warming is only symbolic of the real issue which is not following the actual information laws of the universe I delineated in my 2 books 20 years apart-because they don’t think that language is any more than a human invention or that our kind of consciousness is the only kind. Stuff like that. I don’t know what else to say. I am a mutant. 😂 🤷‍♀️ Love Donald Hoffman’s stuff. I am extremely glad you liked it. Thanks 🙏🏻 If you want to know the higher structure and meaning to things I can definitely help. It has been my entire life’s work. It’s gratifying to see people learning these things. 🥰💡

[@deborahhebblethwaite1865]

I love Donald Hoffman. He is such an intuitive thinking outside the box kind of guy. The world is blessed with him in it. Love listening to him…..🙏🇨🇦

[@learnhowtostart]

Thanks for tuning in! :)

[@farben_]

I have synesthesia and it didn't affect me in the daily life. When I was a kid it was much stronger and varied, it was quite odd trying to ask if other kids saw colors in numbers and letters and they had absolutely no idea of what I was talking about. I also see moving shapes and colors when listening to music, they're 2D but rotating and moving on a 2D plane like a drawing, definitely not like the example Hoffman gave. Every person has a color based on their name, I don't put any thought into it nor can I ignore it, it's all the brain doing on its own. It's definitely not a trip or a drug or a special power at all, just a mild curiosity at best in my case. I stopped trying to talk about it to other people a long, long time ago since a person that doesn't have it can't relate at all, they have no idea in the slightest and you feel like a fool trying to explain.

[@nonpareilstoryteller5920]

But your experience is fascinating though. Isn’t is disappointing how incurious people are? I really don’t understand it at all.

[@transportation-talk]

It is so exciting as well as terrifying to think that our senses are also part of this interface. Does that mean that 'real' us do not see, taste, hear, etc.? This is mind-melting.

[@learnhowtostart]

Couldn't agree more - my mind struggled to keep up in this one!

[@flafaloon]

The real you, is beyond anything you see, beyond an idea or imagining. The real I is what we are yearning for. We are incomprehensible. Some mystical describe our being as more of an energy system of swirling vibrating energy, and even that comes from a void of nothingness. We are undefinable being/knowing/awareness. If a body part were referenced we are the black void in the IRIS of every being in the cosmos.

[@michaelrainbow4203]

But then who created the interface, and how would they create such an interface without knowledge of senses? Did consciousness accidentally stumble upon senses? Do our senses naturally grow out of consciousness? Whatever the case, senses must exist in order to discover them or have knowledge of them. They must exist outside of the interface, because they had to exist before the interface in order to be incorporated into the interface. Or so it seems.

[@flafaloon]

@@michaelrainbow4203 what I understand from esoteric and mystical teachings is that we are this energy which is pure consciousness. Basically, it only knows. As Spira says “we are the Knowing which knows itself to Be”. This energy is overflowing with creative potential, in fact it can be called simply, creative energy. It is very easy for this system to develop a human world with its own senses. This whole experience was created, the story is that we came into this experience, when the truth is we created this experience, the world is in us, we are not in the world. The senses, biology, animals, politics, religions, aging, movies, sports, everything is a fiction. And You my brother, are the watcher NOT the doer.

[@flafaloon]

I might add, the Hindus believe the world to be a play or drama. “The world is a stage” as the saying goes. I know this to be true, it is not my assumption or something I heard or read, or a conclusion I developed, but this is my fact from a spiritual experience I had wherein as I watched my barn lights at night I realized and remembered this world is a stage and all its objects are props. It is cosmic entertainment. Sorry but the ego will be crushed at hearing this, and deep inside you there is an inkling of this truth. So readers may react aggressively, for your human form is an image only, like the last movie character you saw.

[@IHATESTUPIDS]

DAMN I WISH I WAS IN A BETTER SIMULATION

[@Mikey-rj1lr]

As you evolve you will

[@divineoracle7944]

You need to stop saying REALITY when talking about this world. It's an experience of light, color, and vibration nothing more. It's not reality.

[@daniel_caron]

The size (or presence) of the moon is not determined based on caloric expenditure. We're rendering the moon because it exists (in so far as current science tells us). Your question was: "why would we render the moon at all?" and he answered the question by talking about caloric distances. I'm not buying it. I appreciate he has done much more research on consciousness than I have, but if his theory can't answer basic questions, then the theory isn't holding up. Perhaps I'll try some of his other videos. I thought your question was great.

[@learnhowtostart]

Thanks, Dan! I just tried to keep up (my mind was overheating haha!)

[@maxwellndlovu4461]

Thank you for asking precise questions that a lot of us want to know the answers to and I appreciate you not interfering while Donald was answering.

[@drew-shourd]

Great episode, thank you for making/sharing it. As far as math goes, did humans create or discover it?...my answer: both. It is no different than time in that respect. There are sets of laws that exists, and mankind has just learned to 'label' them, in a means to understand them. So we did create AND discover it. We discovered there were constant vibrations and patterns in space and all around us and then we created a way to try and understand it, we call those math and time. I gotta say though, when KZbinrs have a 'give away' IF you like, comment subscribe is like putting toys in breakfast cereal....a way of saying, "Our content is weak, so we need to bribe people"...shame things have gone that route. This is a very cool channel, no need to stoop down giving away toys for viewers bro.

[@dropdead_red]

Brilliant! I’m glad I fumbled around the tube for a few different options of interviews with Don, this one was perfect.

[@learnhowtostart]

Thanks, Brittani! Means a lot!

[@diycraftq8658]

Love the Don. I don't think he's totally right but he's one of the ones on the path to the answers same as kastrup and some others

[@learnhowtostart]

Thanks for checking out the show!

[@anirudhkannan9]

Where do you think he may be wrong?

[@markupton1417]

@@anirudhkannan9 I also intuitively feel that Hoffman is on the right path. Where I think he might go "wrong" is in not better showing conscious agents in action without sensory perception. But I just started this video and my "critique" is based on other videos I've seen of Hoffman.

[@Mikey-rj1lr]

Tom Campbell is another one

[@user-lu9hq6jv4v]

Consciousness; alters material reality and is fundamental. So much to learn, thanks, for helping. I have never heard such perfect questions!

[@caviper1]

He does not prove it. He presents a very strong hypothesis, to which I agree to.

[@learnhowtostart]

Agreed! Thanks for checking out the new show my friend.

[@jdub2378]

Ramana! Hes the samadhi King! We are on the same page!

[@JanSandahl]

Just found your channel. Half way through the video and enjoying this very much (I always enjoy Donald, you are a good interviewer making it enjoyable). I think Tom Campbell and his views, expressed in his work "My Big TOE" does have something to offer in conjunction with Hoffman.s. it took years until Donald said the words "virtual reality" out loud (publically), even if I heard Tom's views echoed long before that. They should talk. Or maybe you should talk with Tom, to add to the topic of this being a virtual reality, and a scientific, logical model that also includes things like love and purpose beyond simply reproducing biologically. I may be able to help getting in touch with Tom, in case if you're interested. Thank you!

[@Mikey-rj1lr]

I am a big fan of Tom Campbell

[@anthonynewton7435]

We see this reality platform perfectly. Humans have been designed to experience arrangements of particles through our sensory systems,the way they appear to us. There is nothing outside conciousness and if there is,it doesnt matter anyway. The way we see it is what sets reality. We had to be given a perception level,this is our setting and it works amazingly. What's behind the thing we call the quantum field dr Hoffman?

[@beavisjones1831]

Yeah i dont believe him either

[@anthonynewton7435]

@@beavisjones1831 I suspect he knows far more than he dares to share. In the least for career reasons but as the subject is of the highest order,could be deeper reasons. He spells most of it out but doesnt even hypothesise over the obvious possibilities his theories provide!

[@beavisjones1831]

@@anthonynewton7435 one of the weirdest things to me is that time CERN was caught having some type of satanic ritual and the legacy media just took them at their word that it was a “prank” and never talked about again

[@anthonynewton7435]

@@beavisjones1831 Yes that was one of the many strange things about CERN. I went down that rabbit hole deep a few years ago. The craziest thing logic wise,is they completly ignore the observer effect. It's no surprise that they keep finding what the theorize 20 years in advance. Its designed so we experience being human and alive,hack proof for good reasons

[@beavisjones1831]

@@anthonynewton7435 really? Thats odd because i remember learning how weird it was that those protons or what ever they shot through the slits would behave differently just from being “observed” thats so odd?

[@timdavis45]

This guy is amazing, really great interview, I'll be looking for more!

[@learnhowtostart]

Thanks Tim!

[@Amethyst_Friend]

Get rid of the word "prove". *No-one* has the definitive answers to these questions. However, we should keep asking them.

[@willsmith9357]

Great podcast! :)

[@learnhowtostart]

Glad you enjoyed it! Thanks for listening.

[@Gawillamon]

I liked and subscribed, great content!

[@shahira331]

I think conspiracy theorists partially understood this and ran with it. From what I understand he is saying that the theory of natural selection says that all of our senses have evolved to the extent that, mathematically, they are 100% different from what they were in the past. Each one on its own. So previous humans might have been able to feel more detail on surfaces of objects, but now we feel less. Pair that with maybe we used to see objects in more detail (picked up different colours, etc) and we have a combination of the senses working so differently from then to now, that the same objects look and feel different to us now than they previously did. With the evolution of all 5 senses according to the theory of natural selection, keeping in mind whatever the mathematical rate of evolution is, he is saying that all the senses evolved so much that there is no chance that any of them receives stimuli in the same way as they did before. This is why he says there is a 0% chance that we perceive the world as we do now. He doesn't mean we are living in a simulation controlled by anyone, he means that our senses together with our brains, now receive their surroundings in a completely different way than they did in the past. Therefore we don't know what objective reality is.

[@daddelong7269]

I've died twice. We don't die but you can be looking right at your dead body & have no clue it's you. It's like you instantly become someone else.

[@roddevere2975]

Thanks for making some complex ideas understandable by asking the right questions. Excellent work!

[@stelun56]

Reminds me of Bach, Escher, and Godel. contrasting parts meeting and aligning as one

[@maxwellndlovu4461]

Well my question is, the Construction/Simulation - is it created by the Brain or the consciousness? I assume we all know that when a person dies the brain gets left behind and the consciousness moves on, now if the Construction is done by the consciousness wouldn't it be safe to say that even when one dies and pass on to the next dimension the consciousness will once again construct a headset in the next dimension thereby obscuring reality once again.

[@_BioKnowledge_]

Impressive! Donald Hoffman is absolutely insane! He is doing tangible/intangible advances in human psychology, Meta-Science like i name it and Non-Duality stuff, i do love 'evolution by natural selection' in the way he talks about. It's outstanding!

[@ziggydow5503]

Loved the vid, this stuff is fascinating

[@learnhowtostart]

Appreciate you!

[@alalohwhydee]

I may be totally wrong, but I think that Donald Hoffman has a very seriously strong point.

[@rosieeilon1882]

Wow!!!New Brave Reality💕 Thank you for the enlightening conversation... Can’t wait to hear more exciting lectures.

[@flafaloon]

Reality is truly fake. I had a powerful remembering of this as I looked in my yard. It’s difficult to process from an ego perspective.

[@michaelrainbow4203]

Yes, but is it REALLY fake?

[@flafaloon]

@@michaelrainbow4203 it is about as real or as fake as your dreams are. This analogy is the best I can use.

[@spacesciencelab]

2:40 so THIS is why I refer to myself as ''we'' like we should do this or we should do that.

[@garyallen4486]

Evolution of the consciousness as played out here in this dimension in this lifetime from birth to death. Individual consciousness under these circumstances seem not to be aware of this learning experience. Sometimes interruptions for example a near death experience suggest through that experience there is a glimpse of our ‘real’ consciousness out of a space time lifetime.

[@crystal0712]

Why do we all see the same things? how come we don't see ourselves differently? Or see our so called objects different than eachother? Like why or how do we all see an apple see the same shape and see its red? How come we all say it's red and some cant see its blue or whatever?

[@crystal0712]

Does anyone understand what I'm asking lol?

[@emannnyy]

Crystal 07 how do you know that red looks the same to you as it looks to me

[@isiakamfugale3621]

@@emannnyy But it's red, for u it may look deep red while for me it may look pale red. I think the question is not answered yet.

[@ovilee4618]

It is the same Consciousness that lives, moves and has Its being in and through YOU... 'as' the dreamstate character that lives, moves and has Its being within this Consciousness. It is All•One ... ALONE. Playing all the parts. This was an NDE experienced with all communication being subatomically telepathic. Not anything I ever believed or even thought about until it occurred. The VR headset is for navigating this 3D dream/realm.✨️

[@pereraddison932]

... virtually virtual reality is really unreal virtuosity showcasing how to literally fill imaginary emptyness

[@silmaramcgarry7053]

Greatly well said 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

[@dragonskinavi]

Great interview...! Better than many older interviewers 😋

[@yifuxero9745]

The problem with the simulation theory is that it's excess baggage. Per Shankara's Advaita Vedanta, everything (The Class of All sets), is Pure Consciousness, "In-Itself". This includes all simulations. Besides, there could be an infinite regress of simulations, one behind the other. We can transcend them all in the sate of nondual Awareness. No problem. Access "Mahamritunjaya mantra - Sacred Sounds Choir" and listen to it for 5 min per day for at least two weeks. The "false" part of existence is Maya, the notion that objects are independent of Pure Consciousness.

[@SGH1111]

Love Donald Hoffman! Love listening to him and learning from him.

[@triple_gem_shining]

good style of interviewing. keep itt up

[@tellurian434]

Most people who thinks somewhat alike to this theory but perceives that consciousness isn't limited to this reality not defined by the common conception of life and death have already given up on reproduction...

[@anthonynewton7435]

Mathematics has to be a fundamental of conciousness. All numbers come into existence from the first concious observation of zero or nothing. The concept of zero creates a singular thing which creates number 1. This automatically continues to infinity. If conciousness exists then all numbers come into existence. That's relativity.

[@floepiejane]

But how does mathematics work without grammar? Grammar is more fundamental.

[@anthonynewton7435]

@@floepiejane I dont think that could be correct. Language is built from objective relativity. Numbers are fundamental as soon as more than one thing exists. Objectify one external thing,and two seperate things exist. One thing plus two things creates three things,all the way up too infinity.

[@floepiejane]

@@anthonynewton7435 how do make sense of the calculations and formulas without grammatical order?

[@subhuman3408]

3:22 ^ 18:49 E 38:33 >

[@sharonhearne5014]

When speaking of this “attraction mechanism” between humans (animals) toward reproduction: I come from a family with a history of mental illness; I mated and created two offspring and these offspring opted not to reproduce offspring. Does this mean that there is an unconscious mechanism in mating between some species where evolution is unconsciously halted in order to ultimately benefit the species because of the negative effects of mental illness?

[@turbojav]

Just because something is subliminally perceived doesn't mean it's a simulation, and not real. It also doesn't mean it can't actually be perceived (with focused attention). Need a stronger example. And how do determine what is real according to Prof. Hoffman's theory?

[@ArtByHazel]

Great concept. Mind blowing idea that will shock your old way of perceiving things. 👌🏼

[@spaceted3977]

I am sure he's correct !!! I've been puzzling over Reality for many years, but Donald Hoffmans theories are the only ones that make senxe !!!! If you watch his videos a few times it becomes Crystal Clear. It is Mindbending Stuff, but fantastic to Understand !!!!

[@sammiejoyner3532]

There is one divided into the many playing all the parts the dream is real who's dreaming u

[@marcobrambilla2439]

Basically, Immanuel Kant updated

[@AmerinDay]

We exist in a Brain, which is consciousness. We exist there for any number of reasons. Which one, I'm not sure but there are two potential possibilities. Either we exist within the consciousness of our creator or god simply because it is superior to us or we are inferior to it. Alternatively we exist along the event horizon of a black hole. In both case we exist within a two dimensional reality. However, those who rule over us and maybe once upon a time we two existed in the 4th Dimension. A place where time no longer exists for it's occupants. Much like a book, for those in the 4th Dimension they can see and know the whole book or choose to go to any point within the book and become a part of the story without ever being part of the story. But for you and me, we are locked within the story living it out even if we can figure it out. Let's call it our penitence. We create reality as do those around us. Although I now believe that there are a limited number of us, the rest are simply Holographic images created to fill the void that exists within our world. We don't die, but simply return again and again, a sort of hell, for reality isn't what we think. We are prisoners of a greater consciousness or trapped within the Event Horizon of a Black Hole. Black Matter, exists within the 4th Dimension, it is like the blood within our brain and gives life to consciousness, our consciousness. This is our reality, we are prisoners. The Question is, is it of our own choosing or were we put here. If the Universe as we perceive it was coming to an end the place most likely to permit us to continue to exist would be a place where there is no time. Either in the 4th Dimension, which exists outside of time or on the Event Horizon where time also ceases to exist. But even if I am right it changes nothing and I remain a prisoner of this reality until freed. But as of yet, I remain here. The End. Good-Luck and Good-Bye !!!!

[@nonpareilstoryteller5920]

Take the ayahuasca.

[@clarencehui9448]

Bad analogy, how is music bad for your health? Stop thinking about it. Try to feel it.

[@twinsoultarot473]

These consciousnesses in balance are the keys that unlock the door that leads to existing outside of time.

[@omenow]

36:09

[@tanujSE]

No sub atomic particles have non microscopic reality too

[@MicheleHerman-z5m]

Darn I missed the contest

[@bandicoot5412]

Yes we are

[@123Human]

We don't exist.

[@marcdeckard7064]

My simulation is as real as I can experience, so it is my reality.

[@yifuxero5408]

The science of Consciousness goes back to the Buddha plus more refined philosophical analyses of Nargajuna (150-250), then on to the foremost advocate of Advaita Vedanta, (Shankara, 788-820). Advaita Vedanta states that the entire universe is Consciousness,, Brahman; and Shankara provided the means of tapping into and merging with IT in the state of Samadhi (Satori). No problem. Access the foremost Shiva mantra of the Rig Veda, (Mahamritunjaya mantra - Sacred Sounds Choir") and listen to it for 5 min per day for at least two weeks. Enjoy the Bliss.

[@Zurealz]

A good shroom trip would bring credence to this hypothesis.

[@DisfiguredGaming]

One of my favourites :')

[@learnhowtostart]

Thank you!

[@childofkhem1.618]

Man your video list is very appealing. I can't wait to get into it. Like a fat kid in a candy store. Keep doing what your doing bro and send me that ps5!! 🤣 🤣 🤣

[@learnhowtostart]

Haha thanks, Jason. The contest ends in 2 weeks, check back in the comment section then!

[@OtherSide..]

Good work

[@lucashood9265]

I've been up and down and all around this topic for yrs. I agree with his input and also see it slightly different. Our reality is a product of us being third dimensional beings coupled with a manipulating force but once we break through the program and see the true nature of our existence then we can begin to create our own reality and therefore what we perceive as our reality is our reality whether it may take on a different appearance we are unaware of it still is our reality

[@maxwellndlovu4461]

So our reality is actually a collective consciousness.

[@ovilee4618]

​@maxwellndlovu4461 The collective reality is actually a Consciousness.

[@twinsoultarot473]

Balancing checkbooks has less than nothing to do with mathematics that shape the universe.

[@helenbostock2350]

No he very clear. I like order one though after another. Wow you explain what very well and simple thanks

[@markupton1417]

You know...you can mix Hoffman together with Leonard Susskind-s holographic universe and mix in a little Nick Bostrom's simulation argument and top it off with problems with information and the Cambrian Explosion and it could really make you wonder....

[@keepinitrea]

So if reality is false.. are people around one not real too!?

[@patriciaching6392]

Just a couple of thoughts.. when stuck say in thoughts of death question if you are dead already?.. A internal death can be more painful than a external. Don't quit before the Miracle. The totem of the Lion or Rabbit, the Rabbit continues to give birth in a world of predators.. don't second quess Consciousness as evolution is included.

[@crystalinabacteria3430]

Every brain on earth experiences a different perspective of reality. One persons thoughts are different to the next. We all seem to be creating our own game. We are run by a biological foundation. We are a biological computer & we grow & die like a plant. Amazing thoughts.

[@helenbostock2350]

Hi writing seems a mission for me.

[@chrisdaldy-rowe4978]

Thoughts faster than the speed of light

[@josephaelredhernandez2835]

There are natural concrete objects. And there are ideas associated with these objects. Reality depends on whose perception. The realm of nature is true. Human consciousness is a false reality but may be true in the virtual sense where truth is consensus.

[@IHATESTUPIDS]

what does all this mean????? i'm an idiot

[@domingomelchor4902]

Now, that’s the greatest oxymoron: False Reality.

[@crystalinabacteria3430]

The more I think the wierd things I think of. Are we in control of our brains or are our brains in control of us?

[@helenbostock2350]

No I hit my toe and my reality is I feel pain.

[@a.rosehawk9751]

Hmmm…he’s correct.🕊🌹

[@bjenkin100]

Donald Hoffman not once ever says anything about a simulatiion....Not his vision AT ALL. he's even been asked about this and he does not at all describe reality being a simulation. I'm SOOO tired of B.S clickbate thats ridiculously misleading. Clickbate like this actually have opposite effect and turn people off of something they might otherwise find quite interesting. Donald Hoffmans much more fascinating than some stupid simple minded simulation movie meme

[@vincesonofgod5534]

THOUGHT IS FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT ....🍞🍷

[@markupton1417]

Kurt Vonnegut....

[@prettysure3085]

My question is did i have a choice to be in this game? and did i sign a contract or something? Coz i sure wanna get out of it in my sleep. But i still keep on waking up :(

[@OtherSide..]

I talk to myself too all the time

[@tylerdrake5002]

Details

[@tomdickandharry9182]

So glad I found this. Brilliant apart from the fact he seems to think art is made by men to impress women! Huh?

[@MicheleHerman-z5m]

How about I get a gift card for some food times are hard and I'm on a fixed income of 934 a month disability. I'd have rather had food more than anything else.

[@tylerdrake5002]

I like the this theorem

[@virkots]

why is it black and white with a yellow frame around it. make it normal. hey google, remove the yellow border. hey alexa, make it now black and white

[@helenbostock2350]

Oh that's interesting

[@Sharperthanu1]

Donald Hoffman should get that mark on his nose checked out by a doctor.It could be skin cancer

[@timemechanicone]

⁉️ TIMESPACE & Time Mechanics solved the theory of everything. ✔️ uncontested

[@xdassassin]

They deleted the vid lol

[@Eyes02357]

Ye sab shri krishn ji ki maya h

[@marcdeckard7064]

Scientist proves that he is a simulation.

[@lemonlimelukey]

the levels of yikes 🤣🤣 my nephew could run laps around mans

[@Dr.Pepper001]

There is no science to this. Just opinionated philosophy.

[@DrunkenBoatCaptain]

Hoffman = Kant + Darwin

[@earrain]

BitTorrent

[@subhuman3408]

©ëL_

[@aguilalaluz7835]

Double talk rubbish--my opinion.