🚨 Donald Trump Shared OUR Video | Here’s How We Filmed It…

#THANKS FOR WATCHING!
𝕏 @RoyceChamberlin
IG @Royce.Chamberlin
MY GEAR⬇️
BASE: Canon C70
amzn.to/3U9IgVM
CAGE: Tilta Camera cage
amzn.to/3U3nqqY
SIDE HANDLE: Small rig wooden handle
amzn.to/47Iir1V
TOP HANDLE: Tilta top handle
amzn.to/3SpA1U1
MIC: Rode Video mic NTG
amzn.to/3vPDW3A
LENS: Canon 24-70 F/2.8
amzn.to/48MGEWw
LAV MIC: ZOOM F2-BT
amzn.to/490GQRt
“I can do all things through him who strengthens me.”
‭‭Philippians‬ ‭4‬:‭13‬ ‭‬‬
#filmmaking #cameraequipment #4k #canonc70 #trump #donaldtrump #usa #president #45 #america #election2024 #bennyjohnson #camera #viral #presidenttrump #edit #editing #review #nikkihaley #nikki #bamberg #southcarolina

[@DaphPeak]

This country need young people like you.

[@avery_chamberlin]

Huge accomplishment💪🏻

[@Antoinette-p1p]

Good for you young man.

[@williamfabuien1125]

Benny is a true patriot you work for an honorable man.

[@jessicasmith6470]

Good for you guys. Just subscribed. 👍🙏🏼🙏🏼

[@Royce_Chamberlin]

THANK YOU❤️

[@markk4336]

Never stop Never surrender R and A.....Great stuff.....Keep it coming!!!!

[@Bellajane127]

Congrats for President Trump sharing your video!! How cool!! Keep up the good fight and God bless! #MAGA

[@Royce_Chamberlin]

Thank you!!

[@1truthse3ker]

Great job!👍 Congratulations!👏

[@Royce_Chamberlin]

THANK YOU! 🙏🏼

[@saltymarine3679]

The man behind the scenes!

[@Royce_Chamberlin]

That’s right 😎

[@jb-vb8un]

they got a store named Piggly Wiggly .... SWEEEEEET

[@Redrosetea]

I’ve been watching Benny for 6-7 years now 🤔 He is THEE best and should I have millions and millions and millions of views each day everyday. He is in the middle not low not high. But great work for you sir whenever you work the cameras!!!!.

[@jacquelineburrows8208]

Don't be so hard on yourself. It isn't about the little details, it is about the message. And this clip got the message out loud and clear. You gave it the small town just walking around the town vibe that reverberates with most of us, instead of some fancy high tech overly edited campaign commercial.

[@Royce_Chamberlin]

😊

[@jryecart8017]

@@Royce_Chamberlin States Push Bills to Allow Illegal Aliens to Become Police Officers Share This Article: February 25, 2024 - - - The disturbing trend by states toward allowing illegal aliens to become law enforcement officers has continued this legislative session. While it is not surprising that open-border states like California, Colorado, and Illinois have passed laws to permit illegal aliens to become law enforcement officers, it is not reserved to them alone. Both the Virginia and Wisconsin legislatures are considering bills this session that would negate the U.S. citizenship requirement to become a law enforcement officer. In Virginia, Senator Jeremy McPike (D-Woodbridge) has introduced Senate Bill (SB) 69, which allows Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) beneficiaries to become police officers, including positions such as chief of police, deputy sheriff, and jail officer. Under current law, only U.S. citizens are eligible to become police officers. Since the legislature convened in January, SB 69 has been moving quickly. The Senate voted 21-18 to pass the bill on February 13. The House Public Safety Committee has also passed S.B. 69 and the legislation appears poised to reach the floor of the Virginia General Assembly. Senator McPike explained why he introduced SB 69 via X (formerly Twitter), stating, “Kids who have always dreamed of being a police officer should have the chance to do so.” Senator McPike is fortunate to have the support of William County Police Chief Peter Newsham. Chief Newsham voiced his support for SB 69, claiming it is “fundamentally unfair” for people brought here as children to be excluded from becoming a police officer. He said, “For them not to be able to do that is an injustice.” While Senator McPike and Chief Newsham appear sympathetic to DACA recipients, they seem perfectly comfortable creating a situation in which illegal aliens can enforce U.S. law-and in doing so, can arrest and take into custody U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents. Furthermore, neither has fully explained how DACA beneficiaries can serve as police officers when federal law generally bars illegal aliens from possessing firearms. < > FAIR US org

[@dnlchoc6830]

@@Royce_Chamberlin Well, your comments about jobs going to China did happen but it's a consequence of all politicians, corporations, and the filthy rich yucks whose only goal is to make more money, pay less, and get a bigger profit margin that's why I don't understand why idiots are against social programs when in reality it's the only way government returns some of our hard-earned working money. Keep up the good job next I would like for you to go to Trump's beginnings and come back with the truth. How he scams people, the 8 times he went bankrupt, wives, etc also do the same with Biden for your followers to get full view thank you!

[@aricbearce9111]

Royce ftw

[@punstress]

Ocala Florida sounds like Oh, Califlorida. Whatever that is.

[@CherryVanila]

💙Love your work with BJ, but If I may put on my "grammar hat" - it's : "my brother and I," not: "me and..." You wouldn't say: "me went to the store," so you don't say: "me and..." . I know that a whole gen of young folks say that--prob because of teachers, but you could put your peers back on a good grammar path!

[@Royce_Chamberlin]

Very insightful lol Thank you!!

[@JeffCamfield]

Thanks for bringing truth to Americans. You're generation is so critical to the freedoms we are on the verge of losing. FJB HE'S CORRUPT TRUMP 2024 MAGA FOREVER 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[@Royce_Chamberlin]

✊🏼💯

[@ecatarina7915]

Doamna😅presedinta You.luss.your.time You.luss.energi.for Nating.your.destin. Is.in.anader.way❤😢😮

[@ChrisPerez2119]

Haha you did fine in the sidewalk

[@cathrynkari661]

I am not looking for perfect photography etc. I want to hear the message only. Stop being so hard on yourself.

[@PhyllisGriffin-sm9kh]

Plus it’s shameful the way he portrayed your video. With the man clearly not holding a trump sign in the video. Seems cool to you because it was a decent video. Just way too bias! Considering someone else is in charge of that town and has been for a long long time. Like still blaming your math teacher because you still can’t add. No! I’m not even republican. I just thought it was so unfair and bias!

[@PhyllisGriffin-sm9kh]

Why didn’t you be fair and ask about Trump?

[@OldProphet61]

Ok, let's play. Haley is running on her "record" that she was great for South Carolina. Facts speak otherwise. On the other hand, Trump WAS great for America. He lowered inflation, increased jobs, and brought back American energy production and manufacturing in a huge way. Globalist Haley won't ever do that. She's George W. Bush in heels.

[@jryecart8017]

Remain in Mexico On October 29, 2021, Secretary Mayorkas announced his decision to terminate the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) program.[6] MPP was created under President Trump, and required migrants to wait in Mexico while awaiting their asylum hearings. MPP took important steps towards decreasing asylum abuse and illegal border crossings. The termination of MPP was part of a slew of open border policies that encouraged lawlessness and asylum abuse, and made it much more difficult to prioritize asylum seekers with legitimate claims.

[@jryecart8017]

Home Elizabeth Jacobs Trump Didn’t Kill the Senate Border Security Deal - the Deal's Provisions Did Trump Didn’t Kill the Senate Border Security Deal - the Deal's Provisions Did February 27, 2024 President Joe Biden and multiple news sources have blamed the failure of the Senate’s recent border bill on Republicans’ desire to keep the border crisis in the news or, some say, simply because they were instructed by former president, and now presidential candidate, Donald Trump to do so. I cannot tell you what former President Donald Trump has or has not said to congressional Republicans on this issue. What I can tell you, however, is that the Senate bill would have done little to improve border security or reduce illegal immigration into the United States. There’s good reason to believe, even, that it would have increased illegal immigration across the southern borde The most important point to understand is that the Senate bill did not even attempt to address the known pull factors for illegal immigration across the southern border. These pull factors include, principally, the near-guarantee of release into the United States after apprehension by a U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) officer. Migrants can expect a near-guarantee of release for a few reasons. Primarily, an almost 30-year-old court settlement prohibits the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from detaining migrants who arrive to the United States with a child, or as a family unit, for more than 20 days. At the time the settlement was issued 20 days could be reasonably expected to complete immigration proceedings for illegal border-crossers. Given today’s immigration court backlogs, however, it is nearly impossible to provide a final decision on an alien’s immigration case in 20 days. Second, DHS, under Biden administration leadership, has done nearly everything in its power to ignore federal laws that requires DHS to detain illegal entrants pending completion of their immigration proceedings. Section 235 of the INA is clear that aliens who submit credible fear claims “shall be detained” pending the completion of their proceedings. Inadmissible aliens who do not demonstrate a “credible fear” of return must be removed “without further hearing or review” if they are placed in what is known as expedited removal proceedings or detained pending completion of standard removal proceedings. The law only allows DHS to avoid detention altogether if it chooses to return an alien who crossed the southern border to Mexico to wait for an (expedited) immigration court hearing, consistent with section 235(b)(2)(C) of the INA. The Trump administration implemented this law under a program called the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), more commonly known as “Remain in Mexico”. The Biden administration here, too, has refused to utilize this existing border security tool. President Biden denounced the policy as “dangerous” and “inhumane”. Despite this, the Biden administration, under Secretary Mayorkas’ leadership, has created what might be called a “wait in Mexico” policy of its own, requiring migrants to wait in northern Mexico to schedule an appointment using DHS’s new CBP One app. The difference with Biden’s policy, however, is that instead of placing a migrant in front of an immigration judge on an expedited schedule, as MPP required, the Biden administration’s program simply allows the migrant to receive parole when their appointment comes up, be released into the United States, and given an employment authorization document (EAD) that may be valid for up to five years. The Biden administration policy, on its own, created a new pull factor for illegal migration. The Senate bill was never offered as a good-faith compromise. It was offered to provide the president cover to say, “Well, I tried.” The Cato Institute, which advocates for mass immigration and open borders, has even exclaimed that Mayorkas’s CBP One scheme is “Worse than Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’”. Cato’s David Bier wrote, “Under the Biden administration’s Wait in Mexico policy, immigrants and families dumped back into Mexico would not even receive a hearing date to await. They do not enter the asylum process at all. All they get from the Biden administration - beyond a push in the back on their way out the door - is the vague promise that at some undefined future time this administration will do ... something to make things better.” Bier acknowledged that under Trump’s Remain in Mexico policy “an immigration judge could at least theoretically grant [a migrant] asylum and entry into the United States”. (Under the Trump administration, Remain in Mexico cases were placed on the immigration courts’ expedited docket, prioritized before removal proceedings of non-detained aliens, and often decided within a matter of weeks or months.) Third, the Senate bill did nothing to address DHS’s abuse of its parole authority. Congress has strictly limited circumstances in which DHS may lawfully parole an alien into the United States and crafted the parole statute such that it may only be used “sparingly”. Specifically, the statute only permits DHS to parole an alien temporarily into the Untied States, on a case-by-case basis, for urgent humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons. The Biden administration has taken this small loophole in immigration law and turned it into a black hole. In addition to permitting aliens to schedule their unlawful arrival to the United States using the CBP One app to specifically request parole, the administration has also created numerous programs to allow migrants to apply for parole from home if they are not eligible for a visa to the United States. These policies allow migrants to fly directly to U.S. airports, receive parole, receive work authorization, and be added to historic immigration court backlogs - in some cases, simply by virtue of having relatives in the United States. In other cases, they allow aliens from certain countries to jump the line and enter the United States based on green card eligibility, while nationals from all other countries who may also be eligible must wait abroad. Even if an alien has not formally applied for parole using CBP One, they may be paroled out of detention and released, again with work authorization, simply because DHS has determined it is not in the “public interest” to detain the alien, despite the federal law’s mandates. Resource constraints and space may also provide DHS a justification (albeit a legally inadequate one) to release migrants CBP has apprehended who have entered illegally. The Senate bill did nothing to address this, either - and might have significantly increased this incentive by allowing DHS to grant work authorization immediately to migrants who enter illegally and submit an asylum claim. Second, it would have allowed DHS to remove ICE and immigration judges from the asylum process altogether by requiring USCIS asylum officers (who typically only screen migrants for credible fear cases, not make final decisions on their cases) to release migrants from detention and allowed them to make final decisions on those cases. It would have also provided additional funding to the USCIS asylum division to do so because the asylum division is already underwater and experiencing historic backlogs. (Sources from USCIS tell me that the affirmative asylum backlog (i.e., asylum cases that are not filed as a defense to removal, but often by aliens who already have lawful immigration statuses) alone has already exceeded one million cases, for the first time ever. That means that an applicant who files an affirmative asylum application today may not receive a decision on their case for as long as a decade.) Third, the Senate bill tried to spend another $1.29 billion on the flawed Alternatives to Detention (ATD) program and provide nearly $7 billion in funding to NGOs and state or local governments to provide housing, transportation, medical care, and other services to migrants, and even foreign governments, as my colleagues Jessica Vaughan and Jon Feere explained in early February. In short, the bill would have expanded what we sometimes call the “illegal immigration industrial complex.” Nothing about this is border security. Rather, it was designed to streamline illegal immigration and obscure the crisis from American voters. House Republicans were right to declare last month that the bill would be “dead upon arrival”. They didn’t need Donald Trump to tell them to kill it. < > CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES