Terrence Howard & Eric Weinstein Drop Bombs on Joe Rogan: Part 1

[@DrBrianKeating]

Who’s right, Terrence or Eric?

[@moreno101791]

Terrence is retarded

[@scooterjackal]

You make a lot more sense than TH or any of his supporters (TH cult members) do.

[@WilliamAllnutt]

That question is insane. Eric is interesting to listen to most of the time. Terrence not ever, even for an instant. The delivery and the content make my skin crawl. So I guess that makes Eric right, right?

[@lordoftheeaglesreaches3710]

@@DrBrianKeating Eric!!

[@r1spa]

@@DrBrianKeating who are we to determine who's right? Especially when NO ONE knows everything The mindset should be open to new ideas considering the fact that we have gaps and although we know a lot we don't know everything

[@ChristophSokol]

The reason for Joe Rogan to let people like Terrence Howard talk on his show and make these extraordinary claims is what happened right after it. Smarter and more reasonable voice came forward and started explaining what was going on (even together with him as in the example of Weinstein). For me this is an overall win. The large mayority of people listening to these podcasts (like me) became smarter for it because of the dialogue and conversations happening because of it. Topics I would have otherwise never been exposed to now have been brought closer to me. And taking everyones claims with a grain of salt should be on todays "internet survival kit" anyway.

[@Ruktiet]

I'd argue that it just polarized people more into what they already believed in, in this fudged up world, barring perhaps a few exceptions. I don't believe many people who "believe" in Terrence Howard's "claims"/"theories" listened to Eric Weinsteins rebuttals and concluded that he must have been wrong.

[@foundationofthought7155]

Yes but Weinstein had a huge agenda here, because he is also not taken seriously sometimes. He realized all those claims are bogus but his point was that three establishment doesn't want to listen to ppl that they consider not in the circle. Which is somewhat true for every single thing we do. If I say I can beat Jon Jones because I have a very good backhand slap that nobody has seen, but have no proof, should Joe take me seriously? In this case he is the establishment.

[@Nall412]

@@foundationofthought7155your logic here is flawed and nonsensical… you might want to think over this one again.

[@donnick83]

@@ChristophSokol I'm not the smartest but when Terrence was explaining something toward the end Eric simply said I don't even wanna touch it that's not a more reasonable smarter person Eric pretty much spent his time saying listen your wrong cuz there's more of us who believe what I believe and we have studied all our lives so that make us right Eric even said quote I don't know if hes right I mite be wrong so that doesn't leave you confused? I'm not saying Terrence is right but people can't just keep saying he's crazy without really diving into what he's talking about just cuz he's not part of a particular academic community that needs to stop..

[@matthewnelson1136]

I generally find science overwhelming or boring. Hearing things from a person who is more creatively inclined made the subjects much more interesting, and in the process of listening to scientist "debunk" him, I've also learned some things. Scientist can be very pompous, complaining about giving someone a platform, please

[@andrewmoonbeam321]

I actually think what he's doing is conflating his own dreams with reality. It's known as the Freddy Krueger effect.

[@micnorton9487]

@@andrewmoonbeam321 Stealing this line 💯💯💯

[@mattlindgren2886]

I see what you did there.

[@mastrotentaculopapichulo]

I still see what you did last Sunday

[@Maxrepfitgm]

Lol 😆 😂 Nice one

[@ericchastain1863]

So do dreams create mytheral valance in thoughtistics

[@chrismonksellye4608]

"Supersymmetry (SUSY): A theoretical symmetry between fermions and bosons that extends the Standard Model of particle physics. Despite extensive searches, no supersymmetric particles have been observed. Therefore, the term is not reserved and Terrence has every right to claim it as an accurate description and identity for his geometric proofs and patents for same Super-symmetrical Systems."

[@Greg1g7126]

He is bring more attention to science than any 100 Phd's. You guys should love him!

[@inblackamericaradio5409]

@@Greg1g7126 that part

[@user-bt2od3yw1b]

Please try to get Eric Weinstein and Edward Witten to do a JRE Episode. It's the episode we all need. Maybe even have Brian as a mediator too you’re always great at it. Rogan has the largest platform and reach no doubt.

[@Gallowglass7]

That would absolutely brilliant

[@djsparkyy]

@@user-bt2od3yw1b .000001% of the audience would have the intelligence and knowledge to understand that conversation I'd still listen though!

[@kmb_jr]

Edward would never.

[@Gojiraa666]

I agree, that conversation would shake the pillars of the earth.

[@Gojiraa666]

@@djsparkyyyou’re not wrong at all and I too would enjoy it regardless. I may not understand most of what they are saying but it is still inspiring and at the end of the day, I would choose a convo I couldn’t understand over a loose, boring meh-burger every single time. Seek out wisdom basically.

[@dailysmelly9756]

I hope Dr. Brian addresses Terrence Howard's citation of the "Dewey decimal system" to defend his thesis. (Of course, it would've been better had Terrence actually used the system to find some books in his local library, but what the heck...)

[@B-Nice]

"In fact I'm one of the worlds experts in the Dunning Kreuger effect" 🤣😂🤣 that was a good one, Dr Keating!!

[@earl5022]

Aren't we all fools living the dunning-kruger effect? None of us know it all. And know just enough to know there's more to know. Those who put others in the dunning-kruger effect are the biggest fools, because they think they know it all and can't learn from other fools.

[@doctoruttley]

I caught that one too. He’s got such a subtle sense of humor, it is easy to miss them at times. 👌🏻😂

[@dailysmelly9756]

Or, according to Terrence Howard, the Dunkin Donuts Freddy Krueger effect.

[@Adambombgallerie]

@@doctoruttleynot subtle, spectral.

[@rwm1980]

I thought he was being literal​@@doctoruttley

[@amrendrapandey8952]

Weinstein is quite reasonable. But this guy is just all over the place. But I liked the conversation for the fact that Weinstein demonstrates beautifully how to have a conversation even if the next guy is almost indefensible.

[@someblackguy100]

@amrendrapandey8952 get off his nuts he don't know u

[@jesusmtz29]

Eric is a clown

[@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu]

Check this, I see a problem. Inflation might not be happening when you comb through the actual observation evidence more honestly. Radiation and mass energy dynamics differ fundamentally, with radiation representing kinetic energy and mass embodying potential energy in a low kinetic state. This distinction means we cannot equate the behavior of photons with mass objects like galaxies, atoms, and massive particles. Redshift, often seen as evidence for the universe's expansion, might be misunderstood due to these intrinsic differences. The expanding universe concept assumes an external vantage point, which we lack. Observing from within, mass radiates energy and gravitational waves, decaying and shrinking proportionally to these losses, creating an illusion of expansion when compared across different masses where all mass evaporates at the same rate do to it's fundamental energy dynamics being the same (volume shrinks). Additionally, galaxies formed from the freezing and breakdown of the Big Bang's barometric waves rather than their continuous expansion, indicating a localized energy dissipation and structure formation process, in the form of angular motion potential energy wells (galaxies), with radiation loss over time (from gravitational waves and radiation). This suggests redshift and cosmic observations indicate mass shrinkage due to radiation or dissipation of big bang convection energy. This explanations is grounded in observables without assuming an external framework that can't be grasped scientifically.

[@consistentche3979]

He wouldn't let the guy talk. A wasted time talking about the right vocabulary instead of the working inventions of Mr Howard.

[@tkyotv1794]

@@consistentche3979what working inventions?

[@yianniskanellopoulos6719]

We still talk about this bullcrap because we live in the age of clowns 🤡

[@tallahoramismo]

✳️ *Content for Views* ✳️ *Opportunity to bring science to people who aren't usually interested in science.*

[@yianniskanellopoulos6719]

@@tallahoramismo you could have said the same for the flat earthers, and every other clown. It saddens me that we need clowns to promote science. While we have geniuses like Brian, Eric, Sabine etc. I wonder these clowns haven't gone to school? Do they know how a book works? Or have they smoked themselves retarded?

[@markonar140]

Didn't the Bees invent the HoneyComb Structure before Terrence!? 🍯🐝🍈

[@Ruktiet]

but they didn't PaTeNt it!!!!

[@fredflintstone8048]

Yes, but Terrence was the first one to try and get a patent. The bees didn't bother with that.

[@wendyg8536]

...and Bees function intrinsically with the electromagnetic field ..so to say that the Seed of life ordering is not relative to the field, has to be bogus....or all bees and their Queens are phony.

[@JakeWitmer]

They bee geniuses! 😂

[@prometheus6474]

Son of a bee

[@Tom6567my]

Lol...😂 People are so jealous because a guy with none of your fancy credentials has challenged the bigger science communities 😜

[@jasonl3254]

If Terrence Howard were an average Joe, then people like Joe Rogan, Brian Keating, and Eric Weinstein would laugh in his face.

[@ajR_tv]

Academia does that anyway, it's deeply imbedded in elitist culture. Everyone over 25 knows this is just how things are and has been for a very long time.

[@MickWop]

no shxt... the literal whole point of Weinstein taking time out of his day was because he (Terrence*) reaches such a large audience with his platform making it way more dangerous to spread that kind of misinformation as opposed to the average Joe with a couple hundred friends on facebook and telegram that more than likely already subscribe to this hogwash.

[@livinginthisgalaxy7961]

IDK...Joe rogan isn't as smart as all the alpha bros think he is😅

[@neepers]

He's just a bullshitter, and Rogan constantly falls for those idiots.

[@r1spa]

That's a dumb statement for the following reason as it can go both ways Because Terrence is not an average person and a celebrity, that's why he is getting so much hate when talking about science.

[@808bigisland]

Time to re-open mental wards.

[@scooterjackal]

Believe me there are a lot of them out there!! I’ve been arguing with TH supporters. It’s like they joined a cult where fanciful thinking is encouraged and critical thinking is shunned.

[@jho2646]

"... all the wonderful films he'd been in" 😂. That was a good one

[@brockparaf97]

Thanks to Brian for packaging his argument.👌

[@DrBrianKeating]

You bet!

[@RodrigoCorreia2099]

I Think people love to witness situations like this because deep down, they want to feel ‘empowered.’ They perceive the ‘academic’ as being wrong, while the person who doesn’t conform to rules or follow conventional paths is seen as better, even a ‘genius.’ It’s reminiscent of 80s movies where an ordinary individual triumphs over Olympic champions and achieves the seemingly impossible. There’s a sense that perhaps, even without formal study, training, or effort, they too can succeed.

[@micnorton9487]

AND IT IS possible,, but there's being a genius and being a genius and most geniuses respect rational basics....... Howard doesn't want to do that, he's delusional and evidently he's seen the movie Good Will Hunting but doesn't remember it because he's casting himself in the title of the main character... His entire performance at Oxford was a joke,, and oh well but he's only gotten crazier...

[@RodrigoCorreia2099]

@@micnorton9487 I agree. I believe all this attention It's just feeding his ego and alienating him even more.

[@micnorton9487]

@@RodrigoCorreia2099 It's kinda sad because as an outsider observer I only see the paranoid narcissism and the delusions of grandeur,, and I haven't walked in his shoes... at first I wanted to believe his flower of Life stuff but then when he started with the one times one stuff it was plain he was delusional and I just,, I felt why is his family not doing anything about this...

[@SilverSlayer]

Eric went a bit too easy on Terry in my opinion.. Actually, that podcast almost seemed to validate Terrance from the perspective of the average viewer

[@Alejandrakoxxx]

🤦‍♂

[@dalaimommadrama8929]

Yes because now his cult following are saying that Eric said Terry was right about everything but that he just used the incorrect verbiage/wording to describe his great theories.

[@TheJamiester]

Yep Professor Dave explained that perfectly: Weinstein is just there farming clicks. He doesn’t want to alienate the lunatics.

[@RWin-fp5jn]

We can all sympathize with Terrence going against the establishment, as we feel something is off in physics (if not academia entirely). Lacking formal education, Eric’s help is appreciated to get his ideas translated into more modest proportions and more acceptable language. Eric’ s own interest lie in the geometric part of Terrence ideas. But new descriptive geometry itself will not save the day. We can’t fix physics by adding new stuff. We can only fix it by pointing out the flaws in our existing theories first. Anyone can add new geometry (GU) or new math (string theory) that has some kind of correct correlation to reality. That’s easy. What is hard, is to cut the crap and start to acknowledge Einstein’s SR is incompatible with Einstein’s GR. All other subjects are irrelevant if we don’t fix this first. The main discussion is about whether we have a real grid (spacetime) or not in physics. And if we agree we do have a real grid; how does motion impact this grid (think contraction of frontal space and time) and how does the grid in reciprocity impact the object in motion (think adding relativistic mass and energy to the object). We have been potty trained not to discuss this single most essential topic in the landscape of physics. Instead we are encouraged to discuss the irrelevant topic of having two different maps of the territory (namely GR and QP). Sorry, but who cares if we have two descriptions. Have 10 different descriptions for my sake. It is not about having different maps of the territory. The essence is whether the territory physically exists in the first place. Einstein’s GR says the MUST be a physically real grid (spacetime). Einstein’s SR says there is no such thing as a spacetime grid and thus speeds of objects are relative only to them selves. Both theories can NOT both de fundamentally correct. Einstein later admitted there must be a real grid otherwise GR could not work through it. It is now up to us to insert this spacetime grid (and its frontal contraction due to speed) as a reality into SR. How else do we suggest the moving object gets its relativistic mass (inverse time) and relativistic energy (inverse space). If speeds were relative only to each other, there wouldn’t be relativistic energy and mass associated with speeding objects, right? Why do we think Einstein constantly dodged the question of relativistic mass during his entire career? The denial of spacetime as a fabric is a LIE that has gone on for 100 years, stopping all progress. Anyone who doesn’t first address this issue is not serious about wanting to grasp fundamental physics leave alone improve our understanding of it.

[@elvisponari3481]

@@RWin-fp5jn lovely

[@gwt123]

Mumbo-Jumbo...word spagetti....Thats about it.

[@wetguavass]

mondongo

[@monraie]

Next suggested video after I finished this one: "Remember this dog? He's famous now". And that sums it up, kids. We're living in weird times.

[@yoyofargo]

When Neil Degrasse Tyson talks about the Dunning Kruger effect, I hope he read their paper, "Unskilled and Unaware", because if he did, he would realize that graph that he's talking about isn't in it. The great irony of it all, is that him doing that, is itself, a quintessential example of the Dunning Kruger effect.

[@Virakotxa]

To me, he always exemplarized the whole concept to perfection. No matter how wrong Terrence was, I couldn't help but to laugh out loud at that line.

[@JaredFarrer]

A lot of scientists suffer from this assuming there doctorate extends to other subjects…. You may have a PhD in astrophysics but that doesn’t mean you know anything about psychology or physiology

[@wrelensmash]

Tyson fell for many of his political circles' hoaxes. He is just as bamboozled as those he sees.

[@Dayz3O6]

@@JaredFarrer dude is a cult believing in more than 2 genders, Neil is as political as you can get his PhD mean nothing if cult dogma cloud your common sense with actual reality.

[@carlosenriquegonzalez-isla6523]

@@JaredFarrer... and the other way around, but I have to admit that physicists are more prompted to do that

[@donnick83]

So Terrence is explaining something toward the end and Eric says I don't even wanna touch it Eric spent most his time telling him your wrong because your wrong because we studied longer and there's more of us who believe what I believe, Eric didn't explain why Terrence was wrong he just explained his own knowledge and why it's right

[@henrytep8884]

Eric does explain why he is wrong multiple of times. What are you even talking about??

[@gabrielsilva5780]

@@henrytep8884 naaa, all he says is "nu huh, you are using our words and terminology wrongly and that hurt our feelings" hahahaha that's all Eric said

[@andrewdavis8777]

He explained why Terrence was wrong for 4 hours. Where were you?

[@ericgraham8150]

Well, consider if someone came into your trade or expertise. Something you’d been successfully been doing for many years. Like maybe being a carpenter or a surgeon. They tried to tell you that you’ve been building houses wrong for the last 20 years… they called nails screws, and Vice verse. They were trying to say they could build a house better than you, yet they had never actually built their own house. They were giving you blue prints that had a hand drawn house that was pretty an abstract design that had no technical information… or technical information that didn’t actually made sense in reality. They were telling you dimensions and instructions that were non sensical . You would try and correct them where they were going wrong and show them all the issues they were confused with.

[@juggernauts444]

The calm approach Eric used remind me of the doctor in the movie Mr. Glass. Dr. Ellie Staple: A psychiatrist specializing in delusions of grandeur who treats patients convinced they are superhuman beings and attempts to are not superhumans. If there is any true or knowledge that they don’t want revealed what approach should they use to stop it from being revealed? The direct approach from the NSA saying this is a matter of national security and taking prohibiting Terrance from disclosing the information. Knowing Terrance he will still do it. Or the Epstein approach and Terrace outing himself. Not convenient either. Terrance talk about zero energy and other topics that if true will change everything. I give Terrance the benefit of the doubt and will wait for him to bring forward proof repeatable experiments. Time will tell

[@bradwilson4387]

While Terrence Howard's theories may be largely inaccurate, they have had a positive effect by sparking interest in scientific research among individuals who might not have otherwise engaged with the subject. This increased curiosity is directing people toward experts who can provide accurate information, which is a beneficial development. Additionally, I admire Terrence Howard’s exceptional communication skills and impressive memory. His passion for science is inspiring more individuals to explore scientific principles and theories. This newfound interest could potentially lead to more people pursuing careers in science, contributing to scientific research, or simply gaining a deeper understanding of the world around them.

[@carlosenriquegonzalez-isla6523]

The only thing that this whole charade is reveling is the failure of our education system.

[@onlyonewhyphy]

​@@carlosenriquegonzalez-isla6523it's worse than that. People openly interested, in general are typically against societal norms and need to be ok with that. Most aren't. Especially in this new Turbo-Vapid world.

[@ajR_tv]

I agree, but then you have Elitists and their colleagues that step out of their protected domes to label you crazy and stupid, even though they themselves have no idea what gravity even is. It's quite hilarious to watch these so called 'educated' people act just as stupid as the people they label.

[@NikoAmeristar]

Is Albert Einstein's theory accurate?

[@ajR_tv]

@@NikoAmeristar It's accurate to what we can see in our macro scale, that's about it, nothing more.

[@Aroundtheworld-ew6rx]

Terrence has said he knows 1 x 1=1 but when you associate multiplication there isn't anything multiplied in the real world where the result is 1.

[@chriss4432]

We all know that a something times a something = something else. But 1 of something is still 1 of that something. He hasn't spotted something new. He doesn't understand numeracy.. you want to trust him on math?

[@DaDgLObElolL]

the result is me and you marked with the 1 and thats mine too but you steal and care less so by all means. I owed you everything, nothing all the middle and 1. and zero and void and its no striaght lines just concentric. arks.

[@ichigokurosaki2838]

​@@chriss4432 But he does because he literally said he knows 1 x 1 = 1. Just in nature, nothing happens like that.

[@chriss4432]

@@ichigokurosaki2838 he knows now! Can you imagine how many people have laughed at him. Nature and the relation between how many of something.. you don't even get it.. ffs..

[@MDCDiGiPiCs]

I watched the Rogan Eric and Terrence interview. I think that Terrence is smart, but he's no mathematics, physics or science expert. He's deluded by his own hubris. Thanks for your rigorous review Brian. Absolutely fantastic.

[@timellis6914]

I agree. It seems like he gets an audience by celebrity. His content is just disappointing.

[@MDCDiGiPiCs]

@@marcosolo6491 most people are smart, just like you pal, it doesn't mean that you are in the league of the scientific elite, or maybe you're one of the millions of typical turds on the internet that have to say something, anything to make themselves feel better. Poor you TROLL

[@DustinRea]

I think you need to do some DMT

[@JaredFarrer]

I think all people who are in leadership roles or PhDs should have psychedelic experience at least once or twice.

[@okeyokey578]

@@JaredFarrer why?

[@okeyokey578]

why?

[@riffman6948]

Because it gives you those couple important puzzle pieces u didn't even know u needed or even lost

[@JoseSantisteban-m5q]

@@DustinRea they have

[@laslog]

Dracula Keating!

[@mikebar42]

🧛💭 Blah! Hahaha

[@wetguavass]

uses hair dye

[@Gil2727]

Eddie Munster vibe 100%

[@BlaziNTrades]

This dude is spitting straight bullshit and the world is afraid to call him on it. Tough times. 😊

[@gen_x_dad]

He's been called on it many times. He just keeps getting attention because he's famous and the usual crowd considers him a misunderstood genius challenging big science.

[@JaredFarrer]

The guy is a narcissistic retard who thinks he is a special being that some alien planted these ideas in his brain. It’s comedic

[@carlosenriquegonzalez-isla6523]

Terrence Howard, Donald Trump or Eric Weinstein?

[@busybillyb33]

Doing so will cause a tear in their own fabric of reality they want to push onto others. i.e. they don't want to be subjected to the same level of critical thinking themselves.

[@onlyonewhyphy]

I think calling him on it has almost become its own genre of KZbin video.

[@matthewmulkeen]

I'm a US patent attorney and agree, I searched the USPTO database and his patent application was abandoned, so that's an abandoned patent application, not a patent. I have no idea where he gets the number 97 from. Perhaps to him 1 X 1 is also 97?

[@FLAC2023]

Both Terrence and Eric are Con artists

[@WilliamAllnutt]

@@matthewmulkeen 🤣🤣🤣

[@duartecunhaleao]

Could it be there are 96 then??

[@scooterjackal]

I’ve seen someone trying to research this. There’s a thread on Reddit about it actually. Patents were filed under slightly different names but yes he has APPLIED for something like 90 patents but not all have been granted. TH says he has to clearly to embellish is credibility.

[@rwm1980]

He said the lawyers wanted him to pay 200,000 dollars, lol I wouldn't pay either

[@ichigokurosaki2838]

When you look up the history of who created the definition of multiplying any number by 1 preserves its identity, not change the value and why this 'special case' was created. You will NOT FIND AN ANSWER.

[@sagenod440]

I think the fact that he calls it Terryology is a big red flag. Is any form of science named after its pioneering researcher?

[@Jose-kv4uh]

what should be the name of it ?

[@koreycain7263]

@@Jose-kv4uhnothing it’s BS 😂

[@koreycain7263]

The sun didn’t spit out planets😂

[@aussiehardwood6196]

Here we are in 2024 with world renowned scientists proving what 1x1 equals....🤦‍♂️

[@Ruktiet]

No hope for postmodern society's stupity.

[@FishermensCorner]

That should always happen. It should never become "religion."

[@Ruktiet]

@@FishermensCorner agreed upon definitions shouldn't be questioned when they're used as tools to advance things. That is just counter-productive.

[@hikelfin5941]

@@Ruktiet we don't live in a "post modern" society, stop drinking conservative tabloid cum.

[@oskarskalski2982]

Just like in the movie "idiocracy";).

[@andrew_owens7680]

The privilege of the rich and wealthy is that even their frivolous ideas get SO MUCH attention! If a coffee king from Starbucks wants to run for president, he gets interviewed by every single mainstream show.

[@TheMaddBlackMann]

Why do people keep skipping past the fact Erik said Terrance is a genius and his Lynchpin idea is brilliant

[@state_of_the_Art712]

cherry-picked

[@HumaKhan9]

Everyone who's smart dont necessarily have to have a PhD. Two young high school kids just solved a 2000 year old math problem. Pythagorean Theorem. I think it is admirable for these 2 little black girls with not even a high school diploma yet. Just like it's fascinating to see an actor be so dam smart. There are a lot of surprisingly smart people out there. It's nice to see something positive for a change. I hope Terrence win a Noble Prize.

[@tsunami6082]

I'm guessing that the girls you mentioned are capable of calculating 1 x 1. Anyone that is not is a moron.

[@drewproductions1358]

I wonder if Einstein started every speech by enumerating his PhDs.

[@Drewdrewdrewdr]

Can anyone give a source where he claims to have a phd from usc? I heard in the Oxford thing he referred to a partner of his as “another doctor”, implying I think that he is one, but that’s all I’ve found

[@HughTube-ni6kb]

If, as here, it were relivant to the foundations of his argument, yes.

[@micnorton9487]

Einstein didn't have to list his credentials,, Dr K. is a contemporary heavyweight who's still building his public name... I think he's giving his resume to contrast with the completely unlettered Terrence Howard,, and to set his mark before part 2 where he discusses the GENUINE heavyweight Eric Weinstein...

[@Swellstew]

Hopefully, no one really thinks T.H is a modern-day genius.

[@Spawn303]

Giordano Bruno was executed by the Catholic Church in 1600 for supporting the Copernican theory that the Earth revolves around the Sun…

[@Doob3i]

He may or may not be a genius. The issue is his lack of detailed understanding of traditional science. If you want to expand on or break rules you need to understand the current rules or laws in depth. He thinks differently which is great but needs to understand the current proven laws and rules in order to expand on our change.

[@natrotho1855]

You couldn’t say Terryology without laughing 😂

[@MrMarcRomain]

Terrence Howard is the modern-day professor Irwin Cory

[@ichigokurosaki2838]

Is there anyway to apply Walter Russell's periodic table to some modern day experiments so we can with certainty discredit?

[@NuAege2302]

I don't think i have heard where Terrence acknowledged that atoms have no electrons.

[@shaundiltz5821]

Most of the dumbest people I’ve worked with had phds

[@geaninatudose4063]

@@shaundiltz5821 yes, right, name them.

[@apophisxo4480]

Where do you work???? It may be your field or the type of job you're in. There are a few possibilities. 1) You work for an organization that requires PhD's. 2) You work for an organization which requires PhD's unnecessarily (in that intelligence is not required to do the work). 3) The PhD's you are exposed to were not gained through work in fields of study that are considered rigorous (ie basket weaving, although just about anything can become complex if you look deeply enough into it). Let's just say non STEM. 4) It could be that your definition of dumb is not mainstream, maybe you mean awkward or lacking street smarts. 5) You might be exaggerating or flat out lying. 6) You may just be an internet troll / asshole.

[@ak47ava]

@@gwt123 lol what you just name social science phds. These aren't stem phds. Lmfao

[@ivant5054]

PhD in bullshitology doesn't count, cmooon, you can at least invent some fake data in economics or behavioral studies... but sociology and the like are just completely made up, it's an insult to even be in the same sentence with engineering, mathematics, physics, chemistry

[@kricketflyd111]

Been there.

[@BumpyHumpyDumpy]

Neil Degrassi Tyson 😂

[@jamesmoore1482]

@@BumpyHumpyDumpy You know ... the guy they named that High School after.

[@tsunami6082]

Are you a racist?

[@Dapper_Ant]

Calling him war machine is amazing lmao

[@islandbuoy4]

P.D. Ouspensky suggested the theory of gravity could be replaced by a theory of interconnected spirals

[@JakeWitmer]

Eric and Joe should take this show on the road...go to some homeless camps and bus terminals...there's an unlimited well of crazy they can mine for future episodes!

[@IntuitiveIQ]

Did he, or did he not, say that 1 x 1 = 2 is a metaphor? The answer is in this video around the 17 minute mark. Specifically, in his conversation with Rogan and Weinstein, he said that he doesn’t believe in mathematics that doesn’t have a representation in the real physical world. He also said that when you multiply something by something else, there’s always a reaction. This means that you can’t multiply two things together and get the same thing you started with. It’s not hard to follow his logic. He didn’t literally say that 1×1 = 2, he’s using it as an example to make a point. The fact that you don’t realize that surprises me. Stop taking him so literally and understand that he’s a brilliant guy with a different way of thinking, and as Eric pointed out on the podcast, he hasn’t had a traditional education, so he doesn’t know how to describe what he believes to people with traditional educations. That doesn’t mean he’s crazy, it means that you may not be able to understand what he’s trying to say. Now, that doesn’t mean that I think everything he says is true, he certainly may be wrong about many things, but he is also clearly brilliant, and has some great ideas, maybe even some groundbreaking ideas. That is what Eric also said at the end of the podcast.

[@paulmuriithi9195]

@IntuitiveIQ torrence is wrong, problem is he knows it and also knows people cannot robustly debunk him. Math is a numerical representation of field lattice symmetritism. Symmetry breaks and convergence bring forth particles. Because of this,torrence is wrong. Sorry

[@2muchtime26]

Thank you for this... after seeing many reviews and comments on his stuff everyone gets hung up on the 1x1=2 thing when he clearly states it was a metaphor meant to get attention. Can't attest to whether or not Terrance is right but I've felt for a long time that mathematics has to be flawed or misunderstood if we constantly have to make exceptions in it to make it work.

[@Alejandrakoxxx]

bro, please study

[@ioanvladescu5987]

Just because he's good at word salads does not make him brilliant. He's brilliant to someone who doesn't know anything about the topics, yes. He's brilliant to simple folk who are against the system, whatever that means, and just want to stick it to "the man". He's anti establishment, and this has become somewhat of a ticket to fame and success if you're extreme enough. I don't think he's bs-ing, but it shows that he has no educated people in his antourage, because any one of them would have told him in the years he spent dedicated to building his worldview that he's flat out wrong and what he's saying makes no sense. I admire Eric for trying to be polite to the guy, but the truth is that he has no theory of anything. It's just word salad. I can pick any inflamatory statement, like : light does not exist, the photon does not exist and start scrambling random stuff about scientific discoveries to arrive to the "ah, you see?" a couple of times and I'm suddenly a genius. Flat earthers also use very "scientific" vocabulary in defending their position, or so it would seem if you know nothing about science. That doesn't mean the Earth is flat. I agree that you don't have to be tenured to be permitted to speak, but when you're trying to articulate your worldview at least learn the basic vocabulary of science, because otherwise nobody will understand you. And that's the issue here, that even if he lacks "traditional education", if he took half the time invested in his whacky ideas to learn some scientific vocabulary, he'd soon realise his theory isn't a theory because it doesn't predict anything, it doesn't explain anything and it's impossible to falsify. His claim regarding 1x2=2 is not a metaphor, he actually doesn't "belive" in, as you say, mathematics with no representation in the real world. And I kind of get that point, because there is this "debate" in physics regarding math, if it's invented or discovered. Terry would probably say it's discovered, but the reality is that it's a mix of both. Math is in part natural and in some capacity is probably universal (if we ever meet aliens, math will probably be the language of communication) but certainly parts of it are invented, because it's a language. 1x1=2 is part of that language. The number "i" is also part of that language, and both have uses. For a guy who talks so much about everything being geometry and no straight line existing, I'm surprised he's so stupid that he doesn't understand why square root of -1 is fundamental to his own "view". There's nothing groundbreaking, profound, great or even logical in his thinking. I'm tired of people like him receiving so much attention, especially a guy like him who's already famous (I can understand for a nobody trying to use it like a quick ticket to fame), while lots of important and real discussions have no change of ever being in the spotlight, like the fact that gravity is in fact a biproduct of yo mamma.

[@tsunami6082]

p x q means that there are p number of q. Howard refusing to accept that a single word can have more than a single use - such that he believes that the word multiply can only be used to mean to increase - is the essence of his ignorance. Words are not platonically pre-defined absolutes. They are defined by their use. in this instance the word is being used such that 1 x 1 means 1 of 1. To be fair, in my experience people commonly say 1 times 1 which is even more clearly 1 of 1.

[@bazookajoe6133]

Gary Busey had the same answers as Terrance Howard.

[@oliverchapman51177]

Utah, 1x1=2. Yeah, grab me 2

[@robertpaterson5477]

@@oliverchapman51177 Best comment on this video😂😂

[@christopherstolper5306]

I feel he can do without the “headphones over the hoodie” little jokey jokes…- I 10000 percent agree with everything he’s saying… But I mean… headphones make your ears sweat I put my hoodie on so it doesn’t suffocate my ear… idk.. but you’re better than that doc.

[@theboizee6606]

Will you talk about the things that Eric agrees with?

[@NikoAmeristar]

Didn't Terrance say it's a metaphor?

[@hadroncollider17]

He said that one time in the beginning but then later on contradicted himself saying that he really believed 1x1=2

[@Ryukikon]

@@hadroncollider17 no he did not

[@BrazaBryan]

@@hadroncollider17that’s a straight up lie lol

[@fredflintstone8048]

Yes he has said that, but he doesn't explain the metaphor. He jumps to the simplistic argument of the semantics of the term, 'multiply' asking the question, 'doesn't multiply mean make more of something?'' I.E 'Go forth and multiply'. He also misapplies multiplication by multiplying one apple with one apple, and one dollar with one dollar'. He also made a claim that multiplying by zero gives you one of something. As Eric pointed out Terrence had some cool ideas about the flower of life in a 3d model, but in truth, Terrence is all over the map with his associations.

[@warrioromarzthefirst5949]

​@Ryukikon yes he did. He stated it clear.

[@kevincarmon2639]

Wow! Why go to such lengths to prove him wrong. Why not just say so and leave it at that? If a homeless man on the street were saying these things there would be no debate.

[@safeysmith6720]

Because it’s misinformation.

[@gorbalsboy]

Because he has a huge audience,fame, appearance on Rogan which means the public will attribute meaning and therefore belief in what he is claiming it also is a good example in fact checking,hope that helps,all the best from sunny troon Scotland 😊

[@bjorneriksson6480]

Frequency of sound is a function of the medium sound propagates through, so his numbers of sound frequency is totally arbitrary and can be anything you want depending on medium through wich sound travels?

[@treece1]

Makes sense to me. Asking as the medium is consistent

[@JamieMichael-s6o]

Frequency remains the same, but the same sound may have different frequencies

[@bjorneriksson6480]

I was thinking about when you inhale helium and produce a higher pitch? It is all very confusing to be, it is not clear to me what he is taling about

[@williamswilliams5617]

Saying that someone is wrong is not attacking them. Agree with Howard or not, you colleagues weren’t attacked, they were challenged.

[@EYErisGames]

The audio in this video is too quiet. Every time an ad comes up it threatens to blow my speakers.

[@julenrojo4624]

Eric doesn't seem to love the periodic table

[@0tedaCecapS]

Eric should come up with a periodic table he approves of and let others evaluate it.

[@bsting601]

If Terrance has some sort of schooling in these subject rather than Listening to layman terms off the experts and thinking he knows , he might have some respect ! I can have thoughts as well off what we all hear but will never have the math or schooling to back it up .

[@OBGynKenobi]

I have a new theory, 5x5=42. Will everyone please talk about me now? But this what America has become, a giant soapbox for utter clowns, and people are in awe. WTF!!?

[@henrytep8884]

You probably don’t even know why axiomatically 1x1=1.

[@OBGynKenobi]

@@henrytep8884 I don't have to know axioms or set theories. But I do know that multiplication is repeated addition, and that's all I need.

[@scooterjackal]

Correction… A giant soapbox for Clowns with money and celebrity!

[@Trojanmachine69]

@@OBGynKenobi 1x1=1 isn't repeated addition by the way lol.

[@experienceofchris1108]

Omygosh you are a genius and the voice of a generation!! Someone quick get this man some acting roles and get him on JRE!! 😂

[@annabee75]

When Brian showed his envy and bitterness about the watch Joe gave to Lex I knew enough about Brian. We should praise people like Terrance for his interest and effort and sure not talk down on them like Brian does.

[@tsunami6082]

We should praise all toddlers that learn to use the potty. Howard is an adult. He hasn't grasped that one of something is one of something yet. If we don't refrain from praising this level of stupidity, then praise will be made worthless.

[@nnnnnbcsyihgfchj]

Lack of required funds when it comes to obtaining a patent for your intellectual property should not be allowed. It has blocked the stone that the builders rejected (which just might be the chief corner stone) for an improved world system.

[@mrcleanisin]

I am not surprised when people are fooled by bad science, because 99% of people cannot understand the 3 doors puzzle.

[@scottboyd3838]

What da hell isthe 3 Door Puzzle??

[@scottboyd3838]

Jkjk

[@mrcleanisin]

GOOGLE it.

[@benorozco3156]

Did Howard actually claim expertise in these fields, I don't think he did.

[@tsunami6082]

Assuming that it is his belief that he has no expertise - why is he explaining theories that contradict the theories of the world's leading mathematicians and scientists? Does this not imply that he regards himself as superior by virtue of the 'fact' that he has arrived at deeper truths?

[@benorozco3156]

@@tsunami6082 that's the difference I'm not assuming, but if I were to grant you your assumption. Why can't he do that, and why are these academics clutching their pearls and shrieking in response. I don't know about his theory as a whole, but his idea about the negative spaces within the flower of life looks interesting, and how people are using what he said to make drones that can fly suspiciously like that tic tac UFO.

[@mikehipps1015]

How can we be rigorous without debate? Are we not obligated to argue points to suss out truths? With respect, were the experts not touting their bonafides and using that authority to denounce Galileo, Copernicus (sp?) and Einstein?

[@rogerforsman5064]

Galileo, Copernicus and Einstein was proven correct by experimental confirmations of predictions from the models not via podcasts!

[@Ruktiet]

Incomparable situation; these people had actual ideas that could be written down in a way that people would understand what their hypothesis were. That is not the case for the semantically incomputable schizoid ramblings that came out of Terrence Howard's mouth and fingers.

[@Mr.PeabodyTheSkeptic]

Should serious scientific inquiry be debating the existence of pink unicorns, the flat earth and 'wave conjugations'? Seriously?

[@wendyg8536]

The fact that Einstein had an open book of Velikovsky on his desk on passing, and was good friends with, is enough to say that even the experts are inspired by far out theories.

[@ethanellis465]

We can be rigorous with mathematics and experiments...

[@Cinnabuns2009]

The only thing I found interesting about Mr. Howard's presentation was the hexagonal pattern demonstrated in a very simple GIMP particle simulator with the conical forces depicted creating the spheroid and the hexagonal pattern as seen in Saturn images. Such a simple model could be tested and combined with current weather models to test accuracy or possibly further our very inaccurate weather models. Hurricane prediction or general weather models may be helped a great deal using that underlying modeling but we'll never know if we wholesale discount that idea and not test it. Also, we have phenomena like "hot spots" (some call spirit wells like the native americans) or "bermuda triangle" spots on the planet that could be possibly explained by these cone centers.

[@bobbybrix00]

Falling to the Gravity is a force trap again, ok. At least this can you spare us from.

[@joecolon8327]

Galileo is a hero now but back then, He was treated exactly like Terrence is treated today. They just want him to shut up.

[@travisbickle9357]

Get out the tin foil hat.

[@simonpeyton-n3h]

that doesnt make him right though,he sees that example and it just feeds his delusion that one day he'll be accepted like Galileo and i dont understand how u cant see that flaw in your argument

[@Jamie-b5e]

@@joecolon8327 anyone ever read king James demonology book lol it's where we get the term psychology. It explains why we kill are prophets like Galileo,Jesus, and Tupac 😉. CERN knows what Shiva is and God open Shiva as female and dropped a atom bomb lol the elite/alien/illuminati/elite/angels don't want us knowing or believing anything because the gig will be up

[@apophisxo4480]

Well, you're right about the "shut up" part.....

[@Thefamilychannel723]

You are right, yet that does not mean Terrence is right. What I agree with is that the ego of a lot of people come in the way of them genuinely looking at what makes sense in what Terrence says or even trying to understand what he is saying. Let's not forget that Terrence, just like Michael Faraday, is an autodidact, a self educated person.

[@jwilson7689]

The more people rip him apart to discredit him the more I think maybe there’s something to it on some level.

[@WilliamAllnutt]

That is what suckers people into every and any con, beware

[@SisypheanRoller]

By that same reasoning, all rejected journal submissions are actually reliable and accurate. See the problem?

[@kmb_jr]

The sky must be green huh?

[@Alejandrakoxxx]

yeah, maybe on the level that he knows absolutely nothing about physics, or math, or chemistry... or any science at all!

[@ismaelbarnes2141]

Terrance is self taught but if you have gone through a Masters program in science, math or engineering you realize there are specialties. The problem with Terrance he jumps to conclusions not fulling understanding the why which is why he’s not onto something bc he can’t explain how he got there. Additionally his work has not gone through peer review. Peer review has its issues which Eros discussed. Eric was very nice to Terrance like a professor is nice to an eager student.

[@patheticpear2897]

Patent pending or actual patent aside, has Terrence actually applied for 97 patents? If he hasn't then he can't even be mistaken in his belief in the assertion, so would be clearly lying.

[@scooterjackal]

This is in fact how he has been embellishing his credentials. He has APPLIED for 97 patents. Some have been granted and some haven’t. The AR/VR patent was abandoned after he didn’t respond to questions from the patent office. But anyone can apply for a patent and applying for a patent does not mean he is right.

[@gardenia3044]

And claiming he's patented mathematical formulas or scientific theories is blatantly false as these aren't things that can be patented, period.

[@Burglecutter]

Weinstein is a joke.

[@througtonsheirs_doctorwhol5914]

1 x 1 = 1! And 1+1 =2 in normal maths.... BUT : 1 + 1 = 1 as well, in pure mathematics.... Wajdi Mouawad starts his theater set "Incendies" with a pure mathematics speech about 1+1=1 in that context...

[@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler]

The problem with the dunning-kruger effect is that the expert on the other side has the same confidence as the fool...

[@NoToobForYou]

Maybe, but is that confidence justified?

[@option387]

But experts have a PHD to back up their knowledge. Dunning-kruger effect is when someone has a bit of knowledge and thinks they know better than an expert.

[@patheticpear2897]

Did you actually look at the graph? They don't have the same confidence, it is even clearly labelled confidence gap.

[@kmb_jr]

@@patheticpear2897 Exactly, confidence never reaches the initial height.

[@ethanwilliam9944]

Eric handled that conversation like a scholar and a gentleman and I think a friendship was born. If nothing else Terrence should be praised for thinking so differently. Being wrong is an important part of science and he shouldn't be ridiculed.

[@fredflintstone8048]

Eric pointed out that Terrence needed to stop talking like a teacher. Terrence wants to be a guru, looked up to. Looking at how he argues his points we can see a very large ego at work here. He also applies an age old trick of deflecting questions about his assertions with questions putting the burden on the person asking him the question. Those questions are not only deflections, they're red herrings changing the subject. example: "Doesn't multiply mean make more of?"

[@scooterjackal]

@@fredflintstone8048 Also until the recent JRE appearance TH never said 1x1=2 was “metaphorical”. In his proof he actually ended by saying the education system needs to be updated to now say that 1x1=2. He repeated this last year at the Oxford Union address. He finally learned how to multiply and is now backtracking. An egotistical narcissist of the highest order!

[@ethanwilliam9944]

@@fredflintstone8048 I just don't understand all the animosity. I'm not saying he's right or wrong. He had many more claims aside from 1x1 and some should be explored. All I'm saying is, and this especially applies to those that consider themselves scholarly, there's no need to shoot him down with malice and hate. Just simply prove why he's wrong. Eric corrected him with class and more should follow his lead on that. I'm not going to even get into the subject of peer review as Eric accurately pointed out the major flaws in the process. I am looking forward to Eric and Brian's discussion on Terrance. If nothing else, Terrence has us talking science and questioning things, (with the exception of the 1x1 ) that's always a good thing for science as a whole.

[@SisypheanRoller]

​@@scooterjackalCan we please stop calling literally everyone a narcissist? It's making the word completely useless in the vernacular.

[@scooterjackal]

@@SisypheanRoller Definition for narcissist: “Personality qualities include thinking very highly of oneself, needing admiration, believing others are inferior and lacking empathy for others.” TH pretty much ticks all those boxes. I can’t be blamed if others are using the word incorrectly.

[@civwar64bob77]

Why didn't anyone ask him, "Then what is 1x2? 3? also 2?" Then ask him if you have 1 group of 3 cats how many cats do you have? How about 1 group of 2 cats? Now how about 1 group of 1 cat? (Answer - Zero That cat thinks you're nuts and ran away.)

[@maxwellsmart0099]

Can 1 cat be considered a group

[@maxwellsmart0099]

It's seems like in multiplication 1 is the problem when multiplying it you itself, that would be the me, my self and I conceptions myself. That's a problem

[@civwar64bob77]

@@maxwellsmart0099 LOL yes. I'm using the everyday word 'group' instead of the math term 'set'. You can have a set with 1 thing in it. And a set with nothing in it is called the empty set. So 1 group of 0 cats equals 0 cats. (Of course, the ancient greeks did not like 0 because how could your have something mean nothing, Such is progress.)

[@maxwellsmart0099]

@@civwar64bob77 a group is defined by more than 1

[@civwar64bob77]

@@maxwellsmart0099 My point wasn't about the actual word group. Use box instead if you prefer. 1 box with 3 cats, then 2 cats, then1 cat.

[@BillyJoeJimBob8]

Eric Weinstein was totally correct when he warned Terrence, Re: what you're doing,... "I want you to think legitimately of what you are doing as a drug, OK, if you are not very careful with the mathematics you're playing with, you are going to get so high that you see everything connect to everything...the concern I have, to be totally honest, is that you have to get disciplined about this as a drug because otherwise, you're going to see everything in everything all the time and you're going to be having the same repetitive conversations where people don't take you seriously because (blackjack reference here) you keep hitting on 19." . Dunning-Kruger effect Indeed!

[@inblackamericaradio5409]

Eric sounds like the guy who will pat you on the head and make you feel wrong, meanwhile stealing your concept and sharing it with his friends as his own. It sounds like Terrence is in the ball field of what’s going on and either the gatekeepers don’t know or don’t want it known. Truth needs no explanation so it will always come out eventually

[@slavesdetach]

Terrence said it's not his periodic table it's Walter Russell's, from like a hundred years ago.

[@christupper0]

Physics breaks down in the quantum realm. The Big Bang Theory has so many exceptions that occur nowhere else in the universe. Euclidean geometry has exceptions. 2D math to describe a 3D world doesn’t make much sense to begin with logically. All of the great breakthroughs in science were preceded by resistance and ridicule. To the point where careers have been ruined to find out later they were right all along. I’m not saying Terrance is right or wrong but at least he has the balls to keep what science is all about alive. People are talking about math and science more than ever before. Terrance might not change history but maybe he inspired someone else who will. Ego has no business in science but yet it prevails everywhere. The knowledge gatekeepers pretend they know everything while we know nothing about the universe isn’t helping anyone

[@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu]

Good point. Multiplication (times) means that something occurs (n) times, therefore 1*1=1 because 1 occurs 1 times. Also, when you multiply by zero, you are saying this thing occurs zero times, when you divide by zero, you are saying there is infinite times a zero can fit into the number, which is true because zero doesn't have a value that can divide against the number on top a finite amount of times. Also (Eric is somehow not able to explain this simple point, and continues to try to sound smart, instead of giving the right answer). The big thing that Terrence said that we will likely discover to be a profound truth is that (something comes in, then something goes out), we will likely find this to be a fundamentally true aspect of the Universe and energy conservation. Also, science is not a community, it is a method, full stop. You can't redefine science to fit your agenda, or to stone wall critics of your theories, science is not a enclave of privileged pampered fools, it is simply a method, full stop.

[@seanharris2188]

@@christupper0 I respect your point of view and I agree with you 100 %. At least he approached science humbly. I haven’t heard him say he knows everything, yet Eric who is human as well is dismissive and rude. And he didn’t provide any tangible proof to dispute Terrance.

[@tsunami6082]

@@seanharris2188 Do you need someone to prove to you that one of something is not two of something? I refuse to consider anything someone has to say once I am made aware that they can't calculate 1 x 1. The opinions of morons are not worth my time.

[@BobsUruncle-dl7cs]

Hes right, the Philosophers Stone was transmutation in the Coles Notes version...c-51 nanotubes grafted to our telomeres.

[@seanharris2188]

@@tsunami6082 he said that was a metaphor 20 times. Anyone who believes in God knows that we don’t know everything. And if 1x1 isn’t 2. He not going to he’ll be hind it so let him “COOK”. See what he chefs up, you don’t have to eat it moron. Knowledge doesn’t belong to any one person and none of you self righteous ppl who pretend to know it all, Can explain how we exist so pray for wisdom , not on me cuz I don’t lean on my own understanding! And Im not as polite as Terrence.

[@poettreeclimber]

Maybe I missed it in this video, but where did Terrence claim "the periodic table is wrong?"

[@jediaelisrael3227]

First joe rogan interview. About a month ago.

[@tsunami6082]

Assuming he agrees with it - what is the point of his putting forward a different one? Every claim that he made that was not in agreement with the standard periodic table is an implicit denial of it

[@NaR00W]

"Math is fundamentally wrong" > "Actually no. Here are some highschool math proofs"

[@BrentRainbow-rh6xf]

Very sad to see the science so could top people. Knock Terrance down. Why guys . Because he challenged the narrative .....

[@paultrauzzi5360]

Terrence is the perfect example why people believe conspiracy theories even after they've been properly debunked. Terrence's ignorance is the reason people support ALL religions but especially scientology and mormonism. We have an enormous need for competent teachers and doers but we get popularities; not what you know but who you know. My good friend considers himself an astrophysicist but has ZERO physics background, he has a music degree. We've had 100s of drunk conversations about useless theories, all funny to me, BUT he is a high school principle. Rogan's show is awesome but it is ENTERTAINMENT and many times he has hacks on that gain HUGE credence and popularity after the show. There are no scientific or technologies in the pyramids that we haven't figured out but that doesn't stop people searching for aliens or worse. Terrance, stick to the arts.

[@tsunami6082]

Howard is very vague. He says 1 x 1 = 2. So what is 2 x1 ? What is 0.5 x 1? Does he accept the rest of established arithmetic whereby he believes that (1 x 1) = (2 x 1) ? Can he provide a definition for 'multiplied by' such that 1 x 1 = 2 and 2 x 1 = 2 and 3 x 1 = 3 etc follow from the definition? Or does he claim that 2 x 1 = 4? What would he make of (1 x 1) + (1 x 1) = (2 x 1)? 1 x 1 is 1of 1 just as 2 x 1 is 2 of 1. Such is a tautology: If I have 1 x apples then how many apples do I have? Howard claims that if he has 1 x apples then he has 2 apples! Whereby, if Howard has 1 apple then Howard has 2 apples such that 1 = 2 !!! Not only is his assertion absurd, it leaves all these questions unanswered whilst providing zero proof. The man is an idiot. Why would anyone bother to consider any other theories of a person incapable of solving something as simple as 1 x 1? All anyone needs to know about Terrence Howard is that he lacks sufficient intelligence to solve 1 x 1. On top of which, after getting the answer wrong his narcissism was so extreme that he has been unable to admit that he was wrong to the present day!

[@micnorton9487]

🎯🎯🎯 Terrence is truly delusional,, to take a dumb calculator trick along with some stoned out rambling about the function of multiplication,, to then cram a few terms and references and wow gullible audiences like The View and Oxford lol, that's one thing... It's celebrity bull crap and I didn't pay attention at the time but then this Rogan thing came along, with Terry really for the first time in his life gaining worldwide attention, the man is truly delusional to think he could come in front of an actual mathematics heavyweight and Eric Weinstein was just going to go wow Terrence you've changed the world... Eric was INCREDIBLY gentle with Terrence,, when Joe brought up Terrence's sun pooping out planets theory Eric just politely said I don't want to go there with an indulgent grin... Terrence is suffering from delusions and it looked like Eric was actually impressed with his mathematics knowledge, I think until the end when Terrence kept insisting on flexing his stupid patents and not recognizing any of the art math equations Eric was bringing out so Eric just basically ended the show ,, shaking Terrance's hand and saying see ya round...

[@Mylove_94]

Anyone with an idea against the “norm” is considered crazy.

[@LucidLoki]

Sure, if you have no solid proof and are fact checked by ACTUAL scientists and just won’t accept your wrong. Then you’d be considered crazy.

[@Spacetime67]

"New things are crazy until they aren't," Elon Musk 🙏 Terrence Howard

[@MojiWord]

True🙏🏽

[@JoeDavidson-hg2el]

Anti gravity does work with voltage plasma

[@babyface2k]

Let’s allow him to discover and invent something (as he promised) because right now we are evolving slow-technology, machine, and building-wise to be complaining 🧐. Slow motion evolution.

[@3D_TUTS]

He's making artistic, associative assumptions, really lovely man, but he has to learn a lot ;) Eric Weinstein was 10000% right about the whole "peer review" debacle though. Well made video Brian, Cheers!

[@DrBrianKeating]

Interesting!

[@micnorton9487]

Yeah but peer review is peer review,, a construction workers peers usually know if you can do a good job or not just if you know how to describe it,, same with auto mechanics or whatever discipline and Eric is an ivy League drama queen who can't resist flexing his credentials LOL but THEY ARE valid credentials,, and I enjoyed the rundown where he calmly told Terrence that he, Eric, had just given Terrence a genuine peer review that other genuine mathematicians in the field would KILL to get, and then saying you're welcome LOL... AND TERRENCE STILL try to flex with those ridiculous patents and came back to his misinterpretation of the word multiply and Eric just gave up...

[@3D_TUTS]

@@micnorton9487 I'm not saying that peer review isn't necessary, I'm just pointing out the significant gatekeeping within the scientific community. It often resembles 'scientism', an almost religious and dogmatic perspective on everything. The Covid era opened a can of worms for me. A PHD means nothing if you can't discern the basic truth from the current political climate. I appreciate how honest Eric is, he's undoubtedly a brilliant man not afraid to speak his mind. On the other hand, Terrence's logic is deeply flawed and often absurd. The mere fact that the interview went viral is strange. However I respect Eric immensely for his approach to Terrence. Any smart 18 year old could easily debunk Terrence's claims, but Eric tried to find common ground and understand what Terrence was trying to convey. But yeah, Terrence's rigidity and overconfidence immensely hurt his position, and his constant 'teaching' was indeed incredibly annoying. Honestly, NDT's video was so well made, he was honest and precise. but you know, calling someone a victim of the 'Dunning Kruger effect' is offensive. While it may be true and evident, it's still deeply insulting to a common man, it's like saying, 'oh, your IQ is too low' or something like that.. But yeah, there's no place for FEELINGS in science. ;D English isn't my native language, I hope you get what I'm trying to say.

[@micnorton9487]

@@3D_TUTS You explained it perfectly,, and I agree... to be fair Neil SHOULD have said that EVERYONE has the dunning-kruger effect to some degree, most handle it well because their ego is in check... And I see what you mean about the "Ivory tower" nature of contemporary high science but the problem is,, and I'm not arguing because I'm sure you'll agree,, that Terry tried coming in at the TOP of the art math discipline when he doesn't have any credentials or any real talking points...... It's all delusional manic talking points about having the key to everything that on the one hand has actual mathematical professionals making highly technical videos knocking Terry's delusions off one by one,, and on the other hand has gullible members of the public flocking over to conspiracy theories and looking for an easy answer to everything... I said before Eric is an ivy league drama queen who can't resist flexing his weighty credentials but THEY ARE valid credentials,, I think Eric is far too taken with his own brilliance and apparently thinks that solving string theory will keep society from collapsing...... I don't know exactly how he thinks that,, the current conflicts over both Ukraine and Taiwan could go nuclear at both ends of the planet at any second and people aren't aware of it but Eric IS ... And the other global problems of global warming and other issues aren't related to art math so I don't see how he claims that high science is being so underfunded but I guess he's the expert... So the main problem the world has to face is either the world coming around to Wall Street's cutthroat capitalism and accepting constant wars into forever, or the world learns how to socially live with each other and then high science can take a Great leap Forward because there will not be any money spent on weapons and ALL industrial Capital can go to uplifting humanity... I'm not familiar with Eric's problem with Fauci and the government's handling of covid,, personally I think it was a real disease and is a real disease and I'm sure Eric isn't pushing the conspiracy theories about it BUT I also noticed that the death count was vastly overestimated, at one point everybody who died of anything was being called a covid death... I sort of understand why the government would employ scare tactics like that but they should have known that they would get a huge backlash from people who know the truth....

[@veveysan]

Terrence does have a number of granted patents under the name T. Dashon Howard or variations. I found 45 patent publications dating back to 2013 on Justicia. 11 are patent applications, 23 are Design Patents (really just patenting shapes represented by drawings, with a separate patent for each shape), and 11 are granted patents that are not Design Patents. Two are for what amounts to a gun where the explosion is from an electric arc causing gas expansion, rather than gunpowder ignition. The others are for structures such as Lynchpin as a framework for a drone and the building blocks of various shapes, covering some of the materials that they could be made from and suggesting some of their applications. I don't know how he gets to 97, but it's clear from his interviews that he's including the applications, and probably counting both the application and the grant in his total. There is still no demonstration that any of these really solve any fundamental problem, as cool as it may be to look at a lamp made from geometric shapes or fly a drone that can spin in any direction. The Lynchpin patent covers motion through the ground in addition to water or air (quite an engineering challenge). Other companies citing his patents or applications are just acknowledging his prior art, patented or not, in their due diligence. Microsoft or whoever then has to convince the patent examiner that their invention is substantially different and novel.

[@em-dy3hn]

A patent holds no proof int he quality of an idea.

[@Foodstamp_Plug]

@@veveysan things a hater would say for $500 pls.

[@monraie]

​@@Foodstamp_Pluga "hater"? Do you think people here discuss a basketball game or something?

[@bobbyd5167]

@@em-dy3hn Quality?

[@bobbyd5167]

@@monraiePeople here? Can you please make sense? And why the basketball reference? Your comment was almost as dragged out as the podcast and taught nobody here anything😴

[@CAB1701]

Eric might be leading the way for humanity. imagine people & country's actually sat down & had a dialogue with each other. Even if what they talk about is incorrect, there's no harm in listening & much benefits in trying to teach someone. Well done Eric, humanity can learn many listens from you giving a fellow human the time to listen. how much better could the world be if everyone had a heart like Eric.

[@kangkim150]

Then you don't know Eric. He had a meltdown on twitter few years ago when 2 physics students challenged his paper. Then he rage quit his successful podcast and went unhinged on Discord also. Now he pops up here and there on his friends podcasts.

[@Education-x6l]

​@@kangkim150can you share the title of the research from the students? And possible links?

[@patheticpear2897]

A guy who has been shown to be lying multiple times, has punched women in the face multiple times, yeah I am so glad he is given air time for Eric to gush about the toys he made. It would be a much better world if wife beaters were treated with a bit more heart.

[@patheticpear2897]

@@kangkim150 Yeah, someone who criticizes his theory is a despicable person and doesn't deserve a response, someone who punches women in the face and says 1 x 1 = 2 that is the person that deserves more time and attention.

[@NuAege2302]

Abuse is abuse, be it physical or mental. If you have never beaten a woman but have shout down on her or cause mental anguish, that is still abuse and people still give you the time and attention in other things. Just because yours is mental and not physical, don't make you or anyone else different or better. There's no perfect relationship with happiness only. However, life must go on in other aspects. Whether physical or mental abuse, both are wrong on equal level and both have caused people to lose their lives.

[@lennysinner15]

Brian, be the change you want to see. In your own community guidelines you ask of us: 1. Be civil and respectful 2. Challenge the argument, not the person. I would hope you follow your own rules. You do not. You brake them multiple times already in the first minutes of this video. The glaringly obvious indignation in your tone of voice, phrasing and condescending quips alone are enough to stop watching this video. When you brake your own guidelines on top of that, it becomes to hard to stomach. My view on Terrence? That's beside the point. And according to your own words, it should be. Hope you take that into account in future videos. I have enjoyed your videos until recently as this trend of increasing sarcastic mockery, and making your person and ego an ever larger part of the video on the expense of the subject matter or argument, sadly, seems to only point upward. Take a page from, your friend, Eric's book. He treated this absolutely masterfully on JRE. Granted, he was exceedingly gracious, but fair when calling BS and explaining why it was BS. With a clear intent of openness and helpfulness to move everyone towards enlightenment, rather than snarling elitist slander with a snobby smirk from the saddle of an academic high horse. Is that what good teachers are supposed to do? The result is, I listened to ca. 5 hours of Eric's walkthrough, with riveted excitement and I learned so many cool new things, both in physics and countless other domains! Things I will remember and things that will prompt further research and learning. I listened to ca. 5 min of this video before needing to stop because of bad taste. The only thing I learned was how to correctly spell "condescending" for this comment. Be better bro, sincerely hope you take this to heart.

[@MarkoTManninen]

It is a universal human right to participate in cultural life, including science, and to benefit from public channels to enjoy and publish, protected by intellectual property rights. Science belongs to everyone willing to take part. The community, whatever form it may take, should review and validate work guided solely by the virtue of truthfulness. Debates on society do not affect the essence of this right as stated in UDHR Article 27. Societies, forums, and governments that attempt to deny this right should be seen as acting against the progress of a better world. The best systems allow two-way anonymous peer review for any citizen scientist, regardless of age, color, race, gender, or titles. Hope that engourages. Good luck with your work.

[@thedude5740]

A cymatic pattern is a slice of something far more complex. There is an as above so below aspect to what you witness with a cymatic pattern. When you see shape and formation designed by vibration on a surface, it is only the 2D version. The 3D versions are the patterns you see as "reality". I understand what Terrence is trying to point to, the issues we are having today boils down to the symbols we use to convey our experience.

[@state_of_the_Art712]

yes

[@AlexanderWiggins-y8z]

Dr. Szasz stuff

[@philippelabrecque6658]

The guy who built the Coral castle in Florida ,alone, using over 10 ton rocks in impossible ways ,wrote a small physics booklet and while drunk said many times that he knew how the Egyptians built the pyramids. He said that the electron model was wrong. He talked about spiraling , spring like forces. He moved 30 tons rocks alone at night with 3 long sticks and a black box at the top. I have no idea how he did it but he did things that aren't supposed to be possible. Went to listen to the Mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot( fractals, chaos law, Jurassic Park...) and he explained how we can predict the outcome of small variable models and complex ones with the help of supercomputers to calculate and predict the outcome of complex models and he said that the Maxwell equations were tampered with and that mathematics were intentionally made to be boring to children to keep most people away. Our history down to Mathematics were tampered with. Im not saying Howard was right but i think we should keep an opened mind on these subjects. Just the debate it has created is good for science.

[@tsunami6082]

We should keep an open mind about Howard's bullshit because of your bullshit? No thanks

[@BobsUruncle-dl7cs]

Mathamatics was weaponized against humanity.....Terrence is not wrong.....Resonant Frequency Physics is not new and this world is about to change at warp speeds....because Subluminal Travel is possible.

[@philippelabrecque6658]

@@tsunami6082 you should keep an open mind because that's the correct disposition in Science since its ever evolving and ever changing and we know so very little and because so much information is hidden from us also. Im in science are you? I don't think so. When Einstein was asked how it felt to be the greatest genius in the world, he responded:" i don't know , you'll have to ask Tesla". And how much of Tesla's inventions were buried again? That's right...

[@mosaicmind4816]

I'm over hearing out Terrence Howard. He's been heard, he's had his chances. He's wrong. Done.

[@Nik-by5mi]

You do realize you debunk yourself multiple times proving Terrance Howards ideas are in fact relevant. 13:20 You state that the Periodic table and elements do not have any frequency.. then you say they do.. but you can't hear them because its a micro wave frequency... WTF? Just because you can't hear a dog whistle doesn't mean there is zero sound. It's still resonates a note! 23:30 Terrance is opening a discussion for truth to solve things and you consider it an attack on you and your science buddies? odd & weird...(victim complex) 25:53 Yeah...The universe is electrically charged.. we are literally swimming in radio waves light waves and cosmic radiation everywhere.. All forms of Electricity! And you again debunk yourself about gravitational waves being the same speed. yeah.."Quite a coincidence." 28:25 then you say Terrance could be right if he's talking about quantum gravity theory" wtf? 29:40 Then you agree with Terrance because other scientist figured out that magnetism and gravity actually are related.

[@adammontgomery7980]

I think that I could convince Terrence that 1x1=1 by showing him that if 1x1=2, then the sqrt(2) = 1 which would mean that the hypotenuse dividing a unit square would also have to be length 1 which is demonstrably wrong.

[@througtonsheirs_doctorwhol5914]

Terence Howard doesn't groks the basic fact : ZERO is an absorbing number... it does exist

[@ichigokurosaki2838]

He said zero doesn't exist in nature, everything is in motion.

[@ichigokurosaki2838]

He said zero doesn't exist in nature, everything is in motion.

[@througtonsheirs_doctorwhol5914]

@@ichigokurosaki2838 he is dumb cuz we see zero motion in tons of things in nature. we see zero God!!! And Zero absorbs, so zero in nature aborbs motion as well in the end as well all know through thermodynamics.

[@junebugjunebug4492]

Let us hear the tones? Make it happen Terrance

[@JaredFarrer]

I’ve seen people like this… folks that with no physics degree or chemistry degree think they know everything about everything. If you think about it… it’s like a strange narcissistic personality disorder. Somehow he read some obscure Walter Russel stuff and some other things and put it all together in his head and thinks he’s right. Lol. People who are convinced they are right are just funny to me. He probably thinks he’s god or some special being to… watch he will

[@Ruktiet]

Are you saying he is wrong about waking up in his mother's womb, discovering "his theories" and telling himself he needs to remember it for after when he's born??!? lol

[@state_of_the_Art712]

credenal-ism is dead, lots of people with those fancy papers doesn't mean anything, and in-fact a lot of these people are dumber than rocks...it only shows they appealed to the Rockefeller-ian education establishment enough and wasted enough of their money to be given a so-called degree, doesnt mean they can think on their own

[@babyface2k]

When Terrence was saying 1x1= 2, he specifically said to use common sense (not the endless mathematics). That for every action, there is a reaction force. Yet to multiply is to increase or cause to increase. But I must say there is not just one meaning to multiplication. It can also mean to obtain from (a number) another that contains the first number a specified number of times. And a push force + reaction can also be done by one thing (1x1=1) 🧐