Driven! The All New 2020 Ford Explorer

The vehicle that sparked the SUV craze in 1990 is now gunning to be all things to all buyers. The 6th generation Ford Explorer is perfectly at home shuttling the kids, trekking into the wilderness, or hot lapping race tracks. You just need to pick the right model for the job. Tom Voelk takes a look at XLT, Hybrid and ST models at the press event near Portland, Oregon.
At the time of publication, E.P.A. estimated fuel economy numbers were not available. The information will be updated when they become available.
Ford Motor Company provided lodging for this review.
SUBSCRIBE HERE ► bit.ly/SUB2DRIVEN
TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS BY CLICKING THE “BELL” BUTTON AFTER SUBSCRIBING!
FOLLOW TOM VOELK ON TWITTER ► / tomvoelk
About Tom: Tom Voelk is an award-winning automotive contributor to The New York Times. His podcast was the first to win an Emmy Award (and he's won for photography, editing, producing and reporting). But really, all you need to know is in the videos. Watch a few and you'll subscribe.

[@chefbeefsalsa2938]

Love the content as always. Finally someone shows the xlt model and drives it unlike the other channels where they just show the sport and platinum. Super underrated channel!

[@ronh2660]

My family had the original Explorer. The interior video brought back memories. Time goes fast. Good review, Tom!

[@ferreo1374]

My father still has his sportstrack Explorer.

[@stupidass7334]

They always recall something on fords. Never fails.

[@nickgrigoriou1643]

We'll be seeing this new version driven by Cops all over New York and Chicago.

[@JulezWinnfield]

Ford markets their Police Interceptor designed Explorers specifically for Law Enforcement, which have mechanical upgrades and different configurations that aren't available on the "civilian" mass market models. So no, you won't be seeing this particular Explorer Hybrid as a police vehicle on the streets of New York or Chicago anytime soon.

[@vwilborn2538]

@@JulezWinnfield Be real, every single time I see the bland mass market explorer I think to myself, is that a cop? So, yes, it will be driven all over the US. An explorer on the outside is simply an explorer.

[@JulezWinnfield]

@@vwilborn2538 I'm being realer than real deal Holyfield. Even unmarked Police Interceptor Ford Explorers have different exteriors than the regular mass market "civilian" Explorers. Different wheels and tires, less chrome exterior trim, roof antenna mounts, different front grille with an optional pushbar, heavily darkened rear passenger and hatch windows, etc., C'mon V, open your eyes son😠😠

[@r4mp4g1]

@@JulezWinnfield False, they actually market the Police Interceptor Hybrid for cops, the mechanical changes are the suspension and wheels, interior on interceptor has base stuff such as column shifter. Check out Raiti's Ride's video on 2020 Interceptor for more info.

[@JulezWinnfield]

@@r4mp4g1 I'm aware of the Police Interceptor Hybrid variant however the original post stated this particular hybrid in this review which lacks the requisite law enforcement upgrades and modifications, would be seen in Chicago and New York as police vehicles.

[@ers1027]

Tom, the Eddie Bauer joke caught me off guard! I like when reviews have some personality. Tastefully done work. Always a joy.

[@rockandroll4689]

It's gorgeous inside and out! I would buy one in a second!!!!

[@apollosbrownies]

I have to say, some of the styling looks derivative, but it’s arguably one of the best Ford SUVs in years. It’s handsome and clean, not overbearing and obnoxious. This will be a good seller. Ford has me reconsidering the brand with the updated Explorer, Edge, Escape, and more now - they’re becoming very competitive again! It’ll be sad to see the Taurus, Fusion, Focus, and Fiesta all eventually die out though.

[@crownr0yalonice]

PretentiousBrownie username checks out.

[@apollosbrownies]

Haha, it’s what I’m here for!

[@golfbuddy1969]

It is nicer for sure, but that interior doesn’t look like it belongs in a $45-$60k type of vehicle. Why can’t domestic manufacturers figure out interior design, fit and finish?

[@markleckband4495]

golfbuddy1969 Domestics really have stepped up their game since the start of the decade, though. They’re on par with Japanese competition and sometimes better, imo. More tech and more luxury. FCA has been doing nice interiors since about 2011. Soft touch points and good consistency. (Really irks me that on some models door materials change based on trim or the rear doors are hard. Honda and Toyota do this.) As usual quality control is FCA’s issue. GM seems to be regressing of late. Ford’s newest products have a really functional design with decent materials. But I agree with you ! For the prices the domestics charge the top trim interiors should really be filtered down more among the trims. All brands flaunt the loaded models to the press and on TV commercials but the models people buy are sometimes surprisingly decontented or sparse.

[@golfbuddy1969]

Mark Leckband Some of GM interiors are downright embarrassing. Ford at least look mostly modern.

[@MrEpic6060]

EVER SAT IN A BLACK LABEL LINCOLN CONTINENTAL OR NAVIGATOR? OK. GO TO A DEALER. ENOUGH SAID. 🤔

[@Lucky8s]

@@golfbuddy1969 Epic dude is right. Lincoln's new vehicles have some of the best interiors out of anyone. It's yacht level luxury

[@alliejr]

@@golfbuddy1969 Agreed. GM is _WAY_ behind everyone with their interiors. The Koreans have left them in the dust. The latest Korean SUVs have better interiors than this Ford, also, but I think the RWD-oriented exterior design of this Ford is VERY good-looking.

[@homeplate60613]

“You won’t have to put passing maneuvers on the calendar” .... laughing so hard had to pause the video. Excellent car reviews.

[@Drebo1971]

This is perfect for driving the flooded streets of Chicago and the suburbs these days. And the off-road capabilities will be very useful for the van-sized potholes.

[@Raven1180]

That ST model... yum

[@keithb1258]

I saw the title that said the SUV that started it all and I expected to see the Jeep Cherokee. Surprised to see the Explorer, that came out well AFTER the Cherokee.

[@fernandolouismiramontes2520]

Wish they did one with a 5.0 v8! That and building it to receive better small front overlap safety ratings by the iihs would make it a perfect option.

[@ferreo1374]

Not build for big V8s but if they can a 3.5l V8 that would be awesome.

[@fernandolouismiramontes2520]

@@ferreo1374 They can re-design it. For example, Jeep's got the v8 hemi's (trackhaws, srt), landrover rangerover autobiography/ sport has a supercharged 5.0 v8, Chevrolet Tahoe/ Suburban have a small block v8 - Ford could do it as their premium level explorer and expedition. I'd pay the extra. I have a 2016 explorer and I love it, but I do wish there was a Ford v8 under the hood.

[@garrettcolby4239]

Yeap 5.0 would have been great.

[@rayguzman5101]

Hey Tom - IMO, your reviews are great. Extremely concise. Thank you.

[@blitzbbffl]

It strikes me that by going back to a RWD based drivetrain - that Ford has instantly separated the Explorer from the gazillion FWD based SUV competitors. Now they're competing with BMW and MB (who they can undercut) and FCA's Durango (which is an ancient platform). Also, for a hybrid design - having that "Pancake" motor in front of the transmission is a clean and efficient solution, which can be adapted to many other future Ford vehicles, including the next Mustang.

[@fgeiger41]

Great review. If I were in the market the Explorer would be my first choice whilst I listed after the Lincoln version.

[@stephenhendricks103]

Great effort as usual, Tom, especially considering the embargo on driving impressions. With the demise of its sedans you're right that Ford has a lot riding on the Explorer, as well as on the Escape, Edge, and humungous siblings like the Extravagance. With its dominance in fleet sales to public agencies and rental companies, Ford will almost undoubtedly retain its overall sales lead in the category. So it's worth noting that they didn't simply phone it in with the Explorer. A prime example is the hybrid version. With combined fuel economy within shouting distance of 30 mpg's, it's no Prius but it's noteworthy. Based on early impressions there's not a lot to criticize but I'm skeptical about several things. That 2.3L turbo four banger is a very impressive engine in the base Mustang but I have some doubts about its performance and durability in a vehicle with a curb weight well over two tons. Load it with fuel, passengers and cargo and you're over 5000 lbs. If that engine was in a loss leader with relatively few sales it would be one thing but it's in the volume seller. I could be wrong but I'm skeptical. Second, I was under the impression that the primary rationale for shifting to a RWD platform was to improve the Explorer's towing capacity. But with a 5600 lb rating, that's only 600 lbs more than a number of rivals. In fact, it's only 600 lbs more than my KIA Sorento. It's seriously short of vehicles like the Dodge Durango (8700 lbs) and some versions of the Grand Cherokee (7200 lbs.) Even the Nissan Pathfinder has a higher rating (6000 lbs). I don't tow anything heavier than trash cans on my long steep driveway but if I were serious about towing I'd be disappointed. Finally, there's the issue of price. I don't put much stock in MSRP's versus real world prices, especially in brands that are likely to be heavily discounted by dealers. But at a $60K+ MSRP, potential customers are likely to cross shop some loaded alternatives in the mainstream category like the Telluride for considerably less money or lightly optioned versions of Ford's own Lincoln Aviator in the luxury class. As I said, Ford doesn't have to worry about losing its overall sales lead in the midsize SUV category. Its fleet sales guarantee that. But I'm not so sure about the Explorer making a big splash among consumers. The competition among midsize 3 row crossovers is tough and getting tougher.

[@rightlanehog3151]

Tom, I hope you get a week with the Hybrid to see what real world mpg turns out to be.

[@danger450]

Chevrolet introduced its Suburban Carryall in 1935.

[@DrivenCarReviews]

Yes it did and it's the longest running nameplate in automotive history. But the Explorer (which was designed to appeal to woman) took it a much higher level when it was introduced. Ford had trouble meeting demand for years.

[@colinabegg4168]

What about the xj Cherokee it was out several years earlier and is and was popular

[@jody024]

And Ford is bringing the Explorer to the Netherlands. A very interesting decision.

[@vwilborn2538]

$54k for a hybrid, well, then, what is the point of the hybrid? $17k more than the base to save $450 a year? How does that make sense?

[@DrivenCarReviews]

The hybrid comes with more standard kit.

[@amigatommy7]

go for the acoustic glass in any vehicle

[@crownr0yalonice]

5k away from 100k! Let’s go Tom! Woohoooo!

[@venom5809]

Seen several KIA Tellurides near me in the last couple of weeks, I assume once the Hyundai Pallisades hit they will move well too.

[@apollosbrownies]

The Telluride is phenomenal - Ford and the like will be facing extremely stiff competition from the Koreans.

[@channelnotfound403]

And with the "reliability" of Ford, I don't even think it will make it to my list either. So far the Telluride and the Palisade are at the top of the list. Can't wait to try the Hyundai, just test drove the Kia last week; great vehicle.

[@mybro727]

John Sanford Hyundai and KIA reliability isn’t better than Ford. Hyundai is facing a class action lawsuit for their randomly failing engines as we speak.

[@channelnotfound403]

@@mybro727 and how many class action suits has Ford had? Until Kia/Hyundai is found at fault and have to pay out / fix, it's just an "allegation". Plus I'm simply quoting ALL sources I could find online that rate reliability and Ford is less reliable than Kia/Hyundai and about 10+ other brands. Maybe after the conclusion of that class action things will change, but I prefer not to make assumptions.

[@mybro727]

John Sanford well it isn’t an assumption that the woman’s engine in her Hyundai randomly failed due to a design flaw and horrible engineering causing the vehicle to ignite up into flames on the road. www.motor1.com/news/297762/hyundai-kia-lawsuit-engine-fire/

[@Cyberslug1]

You keep mentioning ipads so are you saying it's not Android compatible? The screen looks like a Android tablet not a ipad. Apple does not make a tablet with a screen ratio like that!!

[@DrivenCarReviews]

Because "iPad" is easy shorthand for 10 inch tablet. Saying "Android tablet device" is too cumbersome. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard.

[@patrickmichaellangan576]

At least this Explorer is nicer looking than the previous Explorer.

[@cacline72]

"The SUV that started it all" *Jeep Cherokee XJ Crying in the distance*

[@quantum_entangled_tardigrade]

Don't be surprised when the turbo's on the 2.3 start self-detonating en-masse in a few years. Too much pork (4,400 lbs?) for such a small motor.

[@rayguzman5101]

Tom - You are great at these reviews. Valuable information and straight to the point. I want this SUV. I am waiting for the upcoming Memorial Day weekend to see if I can land a great deal. Thanks for educating us.

[@TJC450]

The 4th gen Explorer is my favorite.

[@aayonce4]

You're sooo amazing!! But man is this thing expensive like wth. That luxury prices why not just get the lincoln

[@DrivenCarReviews]

Because the Lincoln will be even more

[@aayonce4]

@@DrivenCarReviews my point exactly don't you think things are getting TOO pricey?? I mean ouch

[@ericfrancis7816]

I owned a 1990 Chevy S-10 Blazer that I still recall with great fondness. I always wonder why the Explorer gets credit for being the vanguard of the SUV craze when the S-10 Blazer had been around for eight years by the time the Explorer made its debut. I suspect it's because the Blazer was all truck and didn't pamper its passengers, while the Explorer was truck underneath and outside but family sedan on the inside. Does that make sense to anyone else?

[@DrivenCarReviews]

The Explorer was roomier and engineered to handle people with ease. If I remember right, the S10 Blazer had small back doors and was pretty cramped. My roommate had one.

[@strelnikoff7]

If you don't research reliability reviews, only thing you'll be exploring after 60K miles is - mechanic shops and Toyota dealerships. I'll never buy Explorer again.

[@TalismanPHX]

Great review, Tom. The new-gen Explorer is very handsome, almost Range Rover-ish. I think an Explorer in the low-mid $40s range is a Decent buy.

[@66skate]

Good review on a really nice vehicle. Ford really addressed a lot of issues with the new model.

[@matt1315s]

I had a 07 Explorer and I loved it to death. However I only had it about a year, because I was commuting from Burien to Bellevue on I405 for school. Gas mileage became an issue. I averaged about 14.5 mpg.

[@matt1315s]

@Go MGTOW Remember those are press cars. There not daily driven.

[@plektosgaming]

Minor correction - the first SUV was actually the Jeep Cherokee.

[@1227Masher]

Test drove the ST model and loved the way it drove. However. The real world fuel economy of the ST is horrible. But that wasn’t the worst part. The model I drove stickered for nearly $61K but had an interior worse than many $25K vehicles. I just couldn’t do it. The acres of cheap black plastic combined with the afterthought vertical nav screen was a put off. We are buying a KIA telluride SX AWD instead. To make matters worse - the quality issues they are having is very concerning. Wouldn’t want a first year model of the Explorer or Aviator. Who would have thought Kia would make a better more luxurious better equipped three row crossover than the company that popularized the segment.

[@michaelh6225]

Excellent review, thanks Tom

[@teamracing6]

I thought it was pretty well established that the "SUV that started it all" was the Jeep Cherokee XJ of 1984.

[@digitalfutur]

more like the Chevy Suburban from 1935.

[@DrivenCarReviews]

I did not say it started it all. I said it helped user in the change in taste from sedans to SUVs and the numbers back that up. Yes, there were SUVs before Explorer but none that were nearly as popular. It was the right size at the right time.

[@teamracing6]

@@digitalfutur Yes, the Suburban has been around a long time. But it didn't start the SUV craze anymore than the Blazer or the Bronco or any other previous 4WD people mover. They weren't even called SUVs back then and people weren't ditching their cars and station wagons to buy them. The Jeep XJ was the vehicle that coined the term SUV and got people to rethink how they hauled their families around. The fact that American cars were total garbage in 1984 surely helped. Fords big role with the SUV was sales volume. Remember, Jeep was owned by AMC in 1984 (pretty small company) and then purchased by Chrysler in 1987 (the smallest of the "big three"). So while the Explorer was 6 years behind the XJ Cherokee, it was a Ford with all that went along with that. So while Ford helped popularize this "new" vehicle called the SUV and definitely fueled the craze, the Jeep Cherokee started it all.

[@tkewrestler2662]

I would give credit to the 1984 Jeep Cherokee. It was a run away success. My parents bought a red one in 1984

[@willb3018]

@@digitalfutur Makes sense to me. They were the first. What do they say.....success has many fathers.

[@HALWG51]

When are they going to have the Base available?

[@porscheguy09]

I don’t like the way the grill tucks under the corners of the headlights. Something about that doesn’t look good to me.

[@robertnapier6608]

Lots of bugs in the software. Expect glitches like the radio and navigation to stop working. Screen to go dead and backup camera to go on the fritz. Not to mention little clunks in the suspension and drive train. I have two ST Explorers. Ask me how I know.

[@crazyone1067]

Hope they have fixed the Exhaust fume issue.

[@DetachedGarage]

I'm very excited to drive the PHEV version of the Aviator.

[@mariuskub]

Thank you Tom

[@turner02]

Telluride more better for sure.

[@JamesThomas-dn6ee]

No it's not more better lol

[@colsphere]

The quad tailpipes are blocked forcing the exhaust to exit out the bottom (via cutouts) of the tailpipes. Any explanation why ford did this?

[@bjlilbbobby]

@tedball Ford did it because of the exhaust fumes that people were complaining about in the previous generation.

[@genius-no5sl]

This is an awesome vehicle

[@ryuninjah]

Don't like the fake exhaust tips. They cut holes in the bottom of the tips for the exhaust to aim to the ground to prevent fumes into the cabin wth lol.

[@shopwithaaron]

Is this on a brand new platform....or maybe a stretched Mustang?? Wondering...

[@DrivenCarReviews]

Brand new platform.

[@stevej.1428]

The 1986-87 Pathfinder is what got the ball rolling with modern SUV's as they eventually became recognized as, as a response to the Blazer, Bronco, Cherokee and 4Runner, which were follow ups to Landcruisers, Suburbans, International Harvesters, and and the 1990 Explorer was just another take on the same general style that's been around since the 50's. The Explorer didn't spark anything, it simply put gas on the fire. There's nothing original or considered a benchmark in design about the Explorer other than they sold a lot of them in the 90's.

[@DrivenCarReviews]

But it did spark the gas in major way. That was my point.

[@wind7sailor]

Once you add the safety suite of equipment to the Explorer, it costs 45k to 60+k; there are many luxury brands that compete in this realm beyond the mainstream 3-row segment. Is a mainstream Ford vehicle worth that sort of money? It is up to the buyers, mainstream, near-luxury, luxury buyers and the US police departments.

[@threepac]

I wonder if Ford could be persuaded to put the Rapter engine in the explorer...?

[@smacdiesel]

I bought a Bronco II in 1985. It was the real prototype.

[@gladdy02]

How long before the recall on this?

[@danzfamily]

Ford fan and Explorer fan...but I still LOL'd.

[@markspark3360]

I've been buying fords since 1987 with my lx 5.0 .... I'm 50 and Had not had a problem yet with any of my ford products

[@RAY-THE-WAY]

Im a ford fan but I'll assume 5 months after release.

[@markgosser9578]

Are you kidding me my 2013 f 150 has had only 2 recalls and one did not have to take to dealer. Honda, Toyota and Nissan are probably triple that.

[@SSS-mp8th]

Pricing on these are like they have factored in the $10k off you'll get after a year. I doubt the Platinum is worth $13k more than a loaded Telluride or Palisade although you do get a more powerful engine. What is the weight to HP ratio?

[@markleckband4495]

The hybrid really begins at 53k ?? I don’t see them selling many at that price. Maybe it’s supposed to be 43k ? Awesome review as usual, Tom !

[@rustlesee]

Highlander hybrid is right there price wise. It's competitively priced. $43k is nicely equipped compact to a midsized CUV range.

[@markleckband4495]

Russell C I just remember the Highlander Hybrid being a 40-50k car. I’m sure Ford did plenty of research and know a fairly loaded hybrid will sell at that price but I don’t know...maybe they’re allowing room for incentives ? And I thought this class (midsize mainstream SUV) typically start in the low to mid thirties and the volume sellers are about 40 or so. Top shelf models are 50 and above. But this is off the top of my head. The avg vehicle transaction price in the USA is rising pretty fast so I could be off a touch. I know in Canada prices are greater - sometimes substantially so.

[@t-bone9239]

Why is the towing capacity so low tho

[@markleckband4495]

My top picks in this class: this vehicle (Ford really have done their homework and it’s clear they will say on top of the sales race), Highlander (safe choice, but I look at it as a 5+2 - small third row, one of the shortest in class), Telluride/Palisade (insane feature content, NKOTB, awesome interior), and I still love the Durango...though now that the Ford also has a rwd unit body chassis the only reasons to get the Dodge is a better interior, higher towing, and v8 rumble...plus it’s not THE cop car. Id actually avoid the Pilot. I’m not a fan of the current gen or and last one (loved the first gen). I feel like upper trims of Explorer - and others - even step on the MDX’s toes. Avoid Pathfinder for obvious reasons (though it fits the bill for people that need CHEAP family transport and will ditch it before the warranty is up). Atlas feels kinda generic and cheap feeling for a VW plus the V6 is slow and uncompetitive. I look at the Traverse as like a more rugged minivan - plenty of space ! It’s length really pays off for families that use the third row every day. Like Tom always says, really test drive and pick the vehicle that BEST FITS your family’s needs !! Great content, Tom !

[@WC3isBetterThanReforged]

When will Ford invite you to drive the Aviator?

[@DrivenCarReviews]

Soon

[@jeffreysegal2065]

Wow. I think the interior tech is great. As for the vertical screen? Accessory phone cradles are usually vertical, aren't they? I like it. Good update overall.

[@brianmurphy9084]

Great review!

[@pjay1281]

It has a very interesting powertrain, but I prefer the KIA TELLURIDE for its near luxury feel.

[@aayonce4]

You really think kia is more luxurious than Explorer?

[@Kryotek7]

@@aayonce4 Just compare the interiors, the difference is night and day. Not to mention the Telluride exterior is infinitely better looking.

[@miguelircontar]

Ford is gonna slap an ST badge on every SUV now since they took away the Focus 🤦🏽‍♂️

[@Acreyman]

This is quicker than the Focus in a straight line

[@byronrideaux]

It looks like a Range Rover Sport

[@ThirdBrainLives]

I'll take an Odyssey. Thanks.

[@jerrymiller3320]

Oddesey....a minivan??? You're funny and boring too

[@ThirdBrainLives]

@@jerrymiller3320 Yeah, a minivan! I have balls big enough to drive one with worrying about my ego. Nothing compares to a minivan if you're carrying people or cargo.

[@DrivenCarReviews]

@@ThirdBrainLives True. Very true Carson.

[@sansfreedom1629]

Honda Automatics, ESPECIALLY in the Odyssey are not reliable in this day and age. I'd go for the Sienna.

[@ThirdBrainLives]

@@sansfreedom1629 Not true. Honda consistently ranks among the highest in reliability. The Sienna is a great van but not nearly as refined and attractive.

[@cliffordlheureux5388]

I paid 25000 for a 200A 2021 Ford Explorer with 25 k miles on it..trade in 2015 ford fusion with 70000 miles on it.

[@haze1123]

I truly hate the way the new blobby headlights intrude on the grille. Current gen is much better-looking. The side and back look mostly unchanged. And pretty dated.

[@telliesmith9825]

Doesn't look like much the styling is bland like I've seen it before Idk

[@jdm1039]

I've seen it in person at car shows. There are noticable styling differences. Majority of changes is everything below the skin.

[@cameron503]

I don't know how Tom Voelk isn't influenced by these junkets that are paid for by the auto makers that he reviews.

[@DrivenCarReviews]

Because I'd rather be accurate than schmoozed.

[@cruzechevy3485]

So, they trying to make it look like more of the range rover.

[@edb.8388]

Good review and yes, the IPAD glued to the dashboard was an afterthought. The top trims are too pricey as well. No arguments with the new design - too bland but not offensive.

[@JamesThomas-dn6ee]

Hardly an after thought dont be stupid

[@edb.8388]

James, that would be called sarcasm...

[@wildone106]

1:32 a cathode ray tube ipad? wtf so thick? Does it have a VHS player in the trunk too lol

[@amigatommy7]

have not figured out screens yet

[@wildone106]

@@amigatommy7 It hasnt even come out yet and already looks dated lol thats typical Ford, they dont age well.

[@djizzah]

numerous faults glitches breakdowns and a myriad of other stress inducing headaches after 2 or 3 years and you'll cut it loose and buy a toyota so you can relax and finally learn the true meaning of trouble free stressless automobile ownership

[@Acreyman]

My 2013 has had zero issues. My 2016 Tacoma was in the shop ALL THE TIME. My mew F150 has been flawless. I think Toyota had reliable cars for the most part, but man they are lacking in innovation and tech.

[@artureff3046]

funny, but the best ford 5.0 V8 engine can be found only in Jaguar/Range Rover SVR models….

[@user-mt4zr5kp7h]

Artur Eff welp... That's what I'll be buying then.

[@JoeSmith-nu8oo]

I'll be driving a Black one with a bunch of little antennas on the roof and special lighting and watching your speed decline rapidly when you spot me on your way home!

[@DrivenCarReviews]

You need one of those side spotlights too.

[@limpunsing224]

Why was the video cut at 9:53, did the Explorer stall uphill ? Whatever, it's a good video review

[@bogga67]

Best car reviews.

[@TheHelghast1138]

Put passing moves on the calendar 🤣 nice cop car 👮🚓👮‍♀️

[@zhiyuanli8735]

Does Ford EcoBoost engine in this generation of Explorer use dual fuel injection now? I do not want to get a carbon-infested air intake valve in the GDI engine every 30k miles.

[@pdlynch4330]

Always wanted an Explorer, but was always worried about reliability

[@rightlanehog3151]

Your worries are well founded.

[@brandonyen7837]

Love it but too expensive for me so I'll get a Telluride or a Palsade .

[@rockislandred]

Simple (but dumb) question.........what's the diff between the Explorer and the Flex?

[@tjs114]

Flex is FWD, new Explorer is RWD. The FWD Explorer and Flex are built on the same platform and share a significant percentage of their interior parts and running gear, but the Flex is essentially Ford's "mini van" meaning the interior cargo space is greater, but not by much.

[@DrivenCarReviews]

While Flex used to share an architecture with Explorer, that has changed with the new platform. If you want a Flex, you might start want to buy one sooner rather than later...

[@prodbyflo]

Tail lights look like dacias

[@fujicross456]

The original midsize SUV was the Jeep Cherokee.

[@mariocomparan5473]

looks like a highlander or old land cruiser

[@JamesThomas-dn6ee]

No it doesn't

[@mariocomparan5473]

@@JamesThomas-dn6ee look at the front headlights

[@mariocomparan5473]

@@JamesThomas-dn6ee its identical

[@2Greenlid]

Nothing like a land cruiser , any generation.....

[@mariocomparan5473]

@@2Greenlid except all of them

[@dygardion9130]

What you say scoosh more???? 😱😱

[@Redhotandblue89]

You forgot passport ;p

[@DrivenCarReviews]

Nope. Passport only has two rows.

[@CTP1111]

ugh this thing is a focus group abomination of a vehicle

[@romeotango58]

$60,000 for the top trim is kinda over the top price wise, you can get a fully equipped Lincoln Nautilus for the same price!

[@DrivenCarReviews]

Hmmm, the loaded Lincoln would cost more and you'd be leaving two people behind.

[@truckinaway2004able]

2nd great review

[@lexusfan100]

so all the engines take regular or premium gas

[@paulm6481]

Thanks but no thanks. Pilot and Highlander have buttery smooth non-turbo V6 engines that will last for easy over 200k. The turbo four will break down and have lag and oil sludge in less than 50,000 miles. Stay away, treat this as a warning.

[@markleckband4495]

Paul M the Pilot only really makes sense and offers value in the EX trims. The Highlander makes sense top to bottom.

[@marcob1729]

Maybe I'm crazy, but the interior looked good to me. Like all Fords, I'm sure that it can be optioned to an absurd level given that quality, however

[@DrivenCarReviews]

The Platinum has a nicer interior with cut and sewn dash. The others are good but not up to Telluride appearance.

[@marcob1729]

@@DrivenCarReviews although Titanium vehicles are definitely nice inside, I've never found them to justify the price. Ironically, some used to feel a bit better inside than last generation Lincolns. My mother's MKZ was just... unimpressive, to be polite about it

[@alliejr]

@@DrivenCarReviews Agreed. I think you nailed it.

[@michaelondracek4920]

The SUV that started it all? That's misleading as hell

[@DrivenCarReviews]

Not misleading at all. It helped start the trend and there are stats to back that up. The first year of production (1990) was constrained by production at around 150,000. From then on on it averaged around 300,000 annually for years. There were SUVs before but none that sold like Explorer when it first came out. It attracted moms that didn't want to drive minivans anymore.

[@michaelondracek4920]

@@DrivenCarReviews well you see you never really talk about AMC years with Jeep. I can promise as a former Jeep dealer Jeep had that crowd locked down. Ford was just a bigger company. So yes that article is VERY misleading.

[@robertjones7565]

Saw one at the dealership I was in yesterday....all black inside & out....no thanks.

[@ripster9713]

Looks like the Edge 😂😂

No thanks I'll keep my Toyota for the last 50 years

[@samaanalkhaldi2364]

The new Ford Explorer is just missing an available V6 Naturally Aspirated Engine, not everyone wants turbo or hybrid engine. Thanks.