Why F1 Pistons Cost £50,000!

[@Driver61]

Did you know so much goes into these Pistons? Thanks to Fuel for Fans for supporting the channel! Check out the link in the description!

[@MrUltraworld]

The other cost here is the incredible amount of time and labor spent on development (R&D). But $67,200.00 is more than I could have imagined.

[@blackace7782]

I'm genuinely surprised they don't use some sort of titanium aluminum alloy

[@3canctheayr]

Ummm, no way they cost 50k pounds. Maybe for their entire allotment for a whole year, but not per engine and definitely not per unit. Each team makes many of these pistons each year & the tech is well developed and understood & has been for a long time. Ultra high rpm engines have been around since the late 50's/early 60's. Modern machining is extremely fast and very accurate & can easily get to very high tolerances. The metallugy is also well developed. Pistons have been made slightly oval on all kinds of engines for decades now. These pistons cost no more to make than anything you'd find in any high level sportbike(many of which spin over 15k rpm). Once they have the design figured, the rest is pretty straightforward. The design work is also much easier now that it used to be. The software available for this is incredible.

[@Iggy900ss]

@@overlandwalkabout6376 I was thinking the same, also he stated that F1 pistons runs with 0.15mm clearance, that does not add up. I hope he will clarify

[@overlandwalkabout6376]

@@Iggy900ss it is an urban myth that f1 engines can't be rotated cold.

[@michaels.ramsey7803]

I built BMW V10 F1 engines in the early 2000s for a Williams chassis team out of Dallas. We machined our own pistons from forged billet bar stock. Then we hardened them by a process of heat treating and cryo cycles. Less than .001% expansion from 0-280°C. F1 tech has made leaps and bounds since then, but what we were doing was pretty cutting edge back then.

[@mtndew4746]

That has to be one insane CNC machine

[@Omega-Phil]

What material were they made from? I don't know of any material that expands less than .001% from 0-280c

[@mgcharoudin]

First time I didn't skip the sponsored message for its smoothness

[@Driver61]

Cheers man!

[@altafmustafa1310]

Kinda agree

[@GRamerDim]

and I still dont trust their legitness

[@HighLifeGermany]

is there any car related video on YT in the trends without a comment from u? :D

[@thoubias]

Then what for did you skip it? 🙃

[@philup4947]

The company I work for makes F1 pistons and I can assure you we get nowhere near £50,000 folr a piston not even £1,000 think you have pulled numbers out from where the sun does not shine.

[@Steph.98114]

I thought it was way too high, yeah it's gonna cost more but in the end it's just a piece of metal with a different tool path on the cnc.

[@tylerboto8930]

I was thinking this like there are alot of backyard built 1000hp motors around and i know they cant hold full noise for the duration of an f1 race but still all it is really is just higher quality control

[@asylumville8544]

Serious question. Does the team you produce for actually win?

[@asylumville8544]

@@tylerboto8930 Can those backyard 1k horsepower builds turn 15k plus rpms..... reliably?

[@tylerboto8930]

@@asylumville8544 thats what I'm saying they cant ,but if backyarders are doing that on a budget of a quarter of the price of a single f1 piston then there is definitely some money wasting going on

[@Bob-je3kx]

Actually the materials are not allowed to be more expensive. F1 regulation really hammers down that they don’t want exotic materials used. Mercedes complains about that all the time, they say that their F1 engines are built out of the same alu and steel as their road cars.

[@DIOSpeedDemon]

I watched a commentator do a series on these engines and the one thing he said, which blew me away, is THERE ARE NO GASKETS..!! Each component part is blue printed to tolerances so close, they parts meet perfectly and dont need gaskets. Amazing! Also Nikki Lauda interview, he laughed when asked where the key was on an F-1 to start it???? (there is no key, just a start button ) . Amazing engine and video, thanks , RH DS D KING DIO

[@fargeeks]

Maybe thats explains why they dont have blow outs at excess rpms

[@tomte47]

As a cnc programer and machinist I call BS on £50,000 unless the raw material cost is £49,000. The tolerances you mentioned are tight, but not something a regular industrial cnc machine can't handle.

[@catttcattt]

As a CNC shop owner in China, I must say you totally nailed it. If the tolerance requirements mentioned in the video are correct, the challenges of making these pistons are just nothing more than our everyday tasks.

[@josefmuller86]

The costs are the R&D costs, certification/F1 legality checks cost and the simple fact that the buyers are willing to pay this price. Normally, the R&D costs in for products would dilute, but since these are made in quadruple digits at best it can be crazy expensive. Not to mention that these need to withstands such forces. And do not forget the certification costs! My parents are dentists and they have to use a lot of certified things, but these are not only the dentist devices, these apply to even things like computer monitors or metal trays, which do not even get close to the patients mouth. The certified metal trays cost $48 (I dont know the exact exchange course), while you can get similar in store for $4. 12 times the price for the same product.

[@hyperlemongt4890]

maybe they buy a new CNC machine for each piston?

[@davefoc]

@@josefmuller86 Even if this were true the pistons still don't cost 50,000 pounds. The research costs what it costs, The question is what does it cost and F1 team to buy the next piston. 50,000 pounds would be nuts.

[@marksmyth9861]

Graphene costs abut $100 a gram but from those in the graphene industry that i have talked to, everything is top secret and they told me that there is an upper limit on the amount of graphene that is used. Graphene is many times stronger than steel and is a mystery material for the outside world. Of course the $15,000 racing bikes and both the Williams sisters tennis rackets are made from graphene, but in racing the old adage is "Speed costs money, how fast do you want to go?" John Force could use it in his NHRA Funny Cars because one explosion he had in 2019 or 2018, cost him about $750,000 in lost stuff as everything on the car and frame was toast. For a racing engine, not Top Fuel or Funny Car, about one percent of graphene in a 750 gram piston will raise the cost of the piston by a few hundred dollars. Two percent is a good number, but in Indy cars, it is about perfect, as they are no where near as expensive as F One engines. But, can you run better pistons at just some of the races but not all of them? Such as the Indy 500, where the winner gets about $2 million in prize money and extra endorsements, running a piston worth $5,000 is probably worth it, just for that one race....even if you place second where you take home about $800,000.

[@dylanmcghee9471]

Never seen someone put in sponsors so seamlessly it doesn’t bother u at all as they normally do!! Great work

[@thunderlucas8923]

Maybe linus?

[@nabo4604]

@@thunderlucas8923 beat me to it

[@endwolf103]

Only channel I know that's as seamless is Tier Zoo

[@lamegliogioventu]

actually they made me stop the video

[@TechGaming45]

I take it you haven't seen rich rebuilds then...

[@WarpedYT]

Thank you for giving me credit! Awesome Video

[@dakillatay6935]

i wach all your viedos

[@nakata607]

i saw it

[@endokrin7897]

More like: "Thanks for taking snippets of my (your) videos (which took days and weeks to make) and, combining them with dozens of clips from other content creators, adding a narration over the top, and making money from it!" I (you) might get a handful of viewers due to this 'exposure'. I'm sure these guys contact every youtube channel they steal...errrrrr borrow... from to get permission! I bet they even share the royalties from the millions of views, and share sponsorship profit.😂🙄🤔

[@adedhuman9582]

@@endokrin7897 really? It's kinda ironic that you're writing a whole paragraph for attention as well

[@kingcosworth2643]

See they spelt it ' Warped PerceRption'

[@overstack7128]

5:40 a 300g piston subjected to 200g force will effectively "weight" 300*200=60,000g or 60kg, not 600kg ! If you multiply the result by 9.81, you get the force necessary to accelerate the piston in newtons not kg

[@firefoxchind555]

at 2:46 why does the coaxiality itself as a base, a roundness or cylindrical shape toleranz would fit mouch better. Valve, pls fix

[@HydraulicPressChannel]

You might want to check the statement that piston experiences more force from direction change than the combustion pressure. I couldn't find the exact number for piston diameter or peak cylinder pressure but max bore is 80 mm, so lets use 75 mm on calculation and then lets use relatively low peak pressure of 150 bars. That generates already 6 tons of force against the piston.

[@Driver61]

Hey, great to have you here! This is the reference for that statement - blog.wiseco.com/how-to-make-pistons-lighter

[@bigfoot1980]

Man I noticed that too but it took me a second and then i was like wait a minute that's not right

[@andyplain4153]

@@Driver61 6seOa

[@1crazypj]

Nope, 100% correct that maximum load is at TDC OVERLAP as there isn't any 'cushioning effect from mixture or combustion. That's something I knew about from motorcycle literature in late 1960's. As for why pistons cost £50,000, didn't explain that at all. (see my general comment)

[@anthonylehner3643]

Damnit Lauri, why do you Finnish think you're so smart?😀 Had to give you some shit! You should get ahold of some of these and do some press tests...

[@TheCarPassionChannel]

I was today years old when I learned that F1 engines seize at room temperature.

[@bizkify]

Same, i was not ready for that information. Also, hi miata dad f1 engine when??

[@norton750commando]

That means my old Alfa engine was an F1 engine but I didn't know it!

[@Martink9191]

they should be too loose to start engine, not to seize... something is wrong. Edit: video has several misinformation. So yeah, pistons can't seize in room temperature. Metals expand when heated, so engine components are really loose on room temperature. Thats why they need to heat up the engine before starting. They just could not start it at lower temperature, because compression flows past the compressor rings at room temperature.

[@phillyphil1513]

@@Martink9191 remember the block and bore diameter also shrinks. the passageways for the pre-heated oil/water are of course located in the block. the piston then gains most of it's dimensional changes off the intense heat of combustion AFTER the engine's running.

[@paulholstein2159]

They are NOT seized prior to starting. The internal components (piston, rings, wrist pin, con rod, etc) "swell up" once they are hot. If it's "seized" prior, it won't start once it's up to operating temperature because aluminum, steel, plasma moly, actually swell up BECAUSE OF HEAT, so the pistons would be even more seized 🙄 than before temperature is brought up lol.

[@daneholt1986]

The key thing that wasn't touched on in this video was production volume. You could spend hundreds of millions of dollars in the design/tooling/production planning of a piston, but if you manufacture millions of them, the cost of each piston decreases closer and closer towards its variable raw material cost. If you spend only $2 million dollars in the design/tooling/production of a piston which will only be manufactured less than 100 times, your per-piston cost is much higher than just the materials, since each piston is absorbing massive amounts of the research/design costs. Long and short, it's not the materials or design that's extraordinarily expensive compared to consumer vehicles, it's the fact that there are only a handful made compared to the millions that are produced for commercial applications.

[@protipskiptoendofvideoandr286]

Look at ev batteries, that logic fails a lot.

[@TamagoHead]

Great points!

[@robertholderman7552]

And the cylinder seizes in the engine block .. LoL . Rubbish .. they say this about halfway through that’s when I stop listening .. !!!!

[@bradgriffith4231]

Actually, quantity doesn't always translate to lower or higher price. My buddy just had a set of Ross forged pistons designed & built for his Olds Diesel block 440ci Super Comp engine with a set of custom 1 off Batten heads & they were exactly the same price as a more common set of small block Ford or Chevy pistons, about $1,400 for a set of 8, including a set of very thin Total Seal rings(.037 comp & .078 oil rings). He was worried he might have tweaked 1 of the oil rings so he called Total Seal & bought 1 comp ring, which was $80 inc shipping! Same thing with his set of TD rocker arms. The heads had to go to BOTH manufacturers for the parts to be designed & made & each pair rockers MUST go in specific locations on the heads. His mid 80s Cutlas has gone 7.96/168 with NO power adders on race gas with a single Pro Systems carb at Phoenix in June with 4,000 ft altitude air density, so it's no slouch & he knows what he's doing. Reher & Morison told him that HIS 555 BBC engine made 50 more HP than theirs! He's hoping for sub 8.50s on an 8.90 index. BTW, his 440 has so little ring friction that the engine won't stay on TDC while adjusting the valves without the spark plugs in the cylinders or a lock on the flywheel.

[@mensaswede4028]

@@bradgriffith4231 Well, that’s because your buddy’s pistons didn’t have $2M of R&D time put into designing them. Someone probably spent an hour or two tweaking some parameters of a template and that was all the design work that was required.

[@roywallace5899]

I was making this comment because I do know that when you buy pistons for an engine and build it there may be a few thousands or more difference in a piston size and each hole in the block is bored to fit that specific piston

[@roywallace5899]

A lot of common thinking about mass production in there I do not know but I doubt very seriously except for the casting or the forging that these are not mass-produced in the sense of their produced and then put out as a product they are produced and then precision machined to exact sizing hence the cost not sure just taking a guess great information I believe

[@PedroDelgado724]

Damn and I'm over here crying about paying $180 for every piston ring

[@aaronstevers5015]

i mean that's still nearly extortion for most cars.

[@nzsaltflatsracer8054]

Somebody's sticking it to you Pedro. Contact one of the ring manufactures with your ring sizes. I just bought Perfect Circle rings for my 638" (4.625" bore) chevy for $212.00

[@rallikas]

and F1 teams burn someone elses money too

[@bigsean2473]

@@rallikas they cost that much because the sport generates that type of money so the parts companies charge them way more. they could sell them for 6-8k each. but it you can make somebody pay more why sell for less.

[@DashzRight]

Too expensive for what you actually need

[@hlxshady]

300 gram at 1G weighs ~= 3N ~= 0.3kg at 1G 300 gram at 200G weighs ~= 600N ~= 60kg at 1G Right? If so, then it's 60kg instead of 600kg.

[@lukasstadler6594]

yep

[@zipsuma6971]

Except they take nearly 10 000g

[@CMCFA57]

Yep, he got the g-forces wrong and the clearances too, so much for precision...

[@Toolman999999]

Thats right. And the g-forces is also uncorrect. The old F1 engines that reved 20 000rpm had as high 10 000g on the pistons, gives the max force on the piston converted to kg, 3 000kg.

[@BademeisIer]

5:43 you are calculating a force (in newton) not a weight here. That statement is completely wrong, 600N don't translate to 600 kg.

[@corwintipper7317]

Yeah 😂

[@BademeisIer]

next time you tag something #Engineering, check the units;)

[@Douken]

Also 2:55 0.15mm is not 60 thou but 6.

[@grumpyone5963]

300 grams x 200G = 60kg

[@dan4653]

Better check the G force numbers again too. Those posted here are way low.

[@Welcometofacsistube]

As a professional machinist who deals with .0001 thousands tolerances, this is just everyday for me

[@colbywalton3238]

Lol was about to comment the same thing 🤣.

[@jamesfoo8999]

.0001 thousands tolerances? Damn man in my job that might as well be the size of a house.

[@avishai7830]

Woo machinist party! I've made parts for both NASA and F1, and keeping tolerances under half a thou are tough, but not impossible! On really critical parts I always use fresh tooling (thanks ISCAR, love you) and loooots of coolant. What machines do you guys use? I'm a HAAS/MORI guy myself

[@colbywalton3238]

@@avishai7830 a party it is!!! I’m a haas guy mainly but have my assortments with fanuc

[@jamesfoo8999]

Yeah I was just being sarcastic really :D Hat's off to your profession requirements, enjoy the party..

[@IlyaBlay]

If the pistons don't fit into the block at room temperature, how do they assemble the engine?

[@sr8159]

Good video but you forgot the biggest cause of costs. The reason why the pistons are so expensive is the low quantity. Designing and planning those pistons is extremely expensive due to the wage for the engineers. You basically have dozens of people work for one product so this product has to “carry” their wage. Normally a high quantity would spread those costs over thousands of components.

[@andriusstankunas6555]

So it basically cheap to make, but they just make it expensive

[@ARockyRock]

@@andriusstankunas6555 I mean when you spend 10 million dollars designing one component and only make 20 of them, you gotta make money somehow

[@jakub8860]

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him. And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ. And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No. Then said they unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself? He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias. And they which were sent were of the Pharisees. And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that Christ, nor Elias, neither that prophet? John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose. These things were done in Bethabara beyond Jordan, where John was baptizing. The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world. This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me: for he was before me. And I knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water. And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him. And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost. And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God. Again the next day after John stood, and two of his disciples; And looking upon Jesus as he walked, he saith, Behold the Lamb of God! And the two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus. Then Jesus turned, and saw them following, and saith unto them, What seek ye? They said unto him, Rabbi, (which is to say, being interpreted, Master,) where dwellest thou? He saith unto them, Come and see. They came and saw where he dwelt, and abode with him that day: for it was about the tenth hour. One of the two which heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter's brother. He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ. And he brought him to Jesus. And when Jesus beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone. The day following Jesus would go forth into Galilee, and findeth Philip, and saith unto him, Follow me. Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter. Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph. And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip saith unto him, Come and see. Jesus saw Nathanael coming to him, and saith of him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile! Nathanael saith unto him, Whence knowest thou me? Jesus answered and said unto him, Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee. Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel. Jesus answered and said unto him, Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these. And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man. And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there: And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage. And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come. His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it. And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three firkins apiece. Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim. And he saith unto them, Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast. And they bare it. When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knew;) the governor of the feast called the bridegroom, And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now. This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him. After this he went down to Capernaum, he, and his mother, and his brethren, and his disciples: and they continued there not many days. And the Jews' passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem, And found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting: And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables; And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise. And his disciples remembered that it was written, The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up. Then answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign shewest thou unto us, seeing that thou doest these things? Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? But he spake of the temple of his body. When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said. Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.” Gospel of John - Chapter 1-2, King James Version.

[@ARockyRock]

@@jakub8860 can you tell this god dude you speak of to do something productive for once instead of being a petty, murderous, power hungry child?

[@roberthoyland94]

With tolerances so tight, I would love to see how they assemble the engines and get those pistons inside in the first place.

[@Noodle999]

Very carefully with a warm block I'd imagine.

[@davidmalin5491]

They use dry ice to freeze the piston which shrinks it

[@Wehra96]

i work with tolerances down to about +-0.0015mm and i can say it's more time consuming than it is hard to work with. such fine tolerances also very expensive ofc.

[@devinhudson4905]

@@Wehra96 what do you do? Those are tight!

[@Wehra96]

@@devinhudson4905 i manufacture parts mostly for hydraulic systems, my job title is CNC operator but i also do honing of valve components which usually have a tolerance of either +0mm to -0.003mm or +0mm to -0.005mm. anything over 0.01mm would be considered pretty easy tolerances to deal with.

[@RedSpringChest]

That was the smoothest sponsor transition I’ve ever seen

[@justincase51]

M

[@zafrylaiman8695]

Eh maybe from a car channel. Polymatter does it better, that's what he's known for.

[@JB-zn1kx]

"This is why the engine block seizes when it cold... the cylinder block expands more than the cylinder when it's cold" I guess you didn't realize this was total rubbish till someone called you out

[@thecloneguyz]

I had a 69 Buick LeSabre that had a 350 in it that would literally SIEZE itself when it got hot and when it cooled down you could fire it up again and it did this over and over and over again! When it was hot you could not turn anything with your hands as soon as it cooled down you could spin everything in the front end again

[@tonythemadbrit9479]

The problem with cost of parts in F1, Indycar, WRC and other expensive series is that if the cars could be built much cheaper, the sponsors wouldn't accept paying multimillion dollar deals. These teams are out to make a profit, so cheaper cars means less money from sponsors, and therefore less profit for the team. I rallied when it was possible to build a competitive WRC car for about the price of this (alleged) £50,000 piston. If I'd asked my sponsor for £1,000,000 for the season he'd probably still be laughing today.

[@danielstr3924]

2:55 : My 14 years old motorcycle has a maximum clearance of piston and bore of 0,05mm... Are you sure this number is right? 0.15 is huge...

[@therwfer]

This. 0.15 is more of a russian standard.

[@spike4850]

@@therwfer "Eh, stop complaining Vasiliy, I hammer it into block so it fit"

[@klesmer]

He got his MM vs Inches mixed up.

[@MrHarleyjohnsson]

0,15mm is normal clearance for forged pistons, cast pistons require much less clearances.

[@eduards9379]

I think it migth have been an example and not coroct

[@SidneyCritic]

1:37 It's a big misconception that the 2nd ring is a compression ring, it's actually an oil scraper. If the 2nd ever traps comp it will lift the top ring and kill power. Pro Stock has a higher G loading because it has 3x longer stroke and revs only 3000rpm less.

[@bradgriffith4231]

Pro Stock engines are actually very short stroke for being 500 cubic inches. The Chevy PS engines are currently 4.700" bore & 3.600" stroke, although that is probably at least 3 times the stroke of an F1 engine

[@Victornoo]

but the alu piston of my bike costs like 40$ and also revs up to 15000rpm

[@LanceCampeau]

I re-watch your videos all the time... There is so much quality information. I love the F1 "rocket fuel" and "Group B madness" videos the best

[@kdwaynec]

These comments are truly amazing! I am humbled to be "rubbing elbows" with so many intelligent, knowledgeable and experienced F1 engineers, racers, and engine builders who are gracious enough to correct nearly everything this fellow said! Thank you all so much!

[@davidorama6690]

I hadn’t thought about clearances in an F1 engine before... pistons effectively seized in a cylinder until the engine approaches operating temperature is amazing and surprising... but makes perfect sense... now I understand why start up and shut down procedures are so crucial to preserve an engine and maintain tolerances... amazing engineering... thank you for this video.

[@Remsster]

I've heard numerous times that it's just not true. But that preparing does help with reducing wear.

[@philipplippe3607]

Wow im real stupid but I’m a learned milling machine operator in Germany, and when you talk about 0,1mm its like such an incredible huge of variation,... like even if you’re are an apprentice on a 50 year old machine, you have to be capable of producing products which are 10 times more accurate, and sometimes up to 50 times... and that is really something a good machine operator can achieve ... Just interesting to see it from another perspective

[@philipplippe3607]

P.s. I worked on road car parts and even there, there is no part of the motor in which tolerances of 0,1mm can be accepted .....over here we call it carpenters tolerances... but 0,1mm is a waaaaay to big tolerance in Automobil standards... even if it’s not f1

[@trevor9947]

I was so confused by that part he definatly has the conversion wrong because 60 thou is such a big number for anything the first part I ever made in school was a 30 thou tolerance

[@methardris]

Ive put Wiseco forged pistons in my s13’s ca18det. €1050,- for 4.

[@moninum]

Hey, that´s a bargain!

[@randomtux1234]

7:25 pounded into shape in the UK- is it dollared into shape in the US?

[@henryriehl2114]

the tolerances you mentioned are wrong

[@maximumst]

How are these engines initially assembled? Do they have to be at operating temp then as well?

[@rShadowFace]

they probably cool the pistons & rods and heat up the block, that should make it easier, u even use that technique in normal cars sometimes, like changing bearings in a gearbox or engine etc.

[@willlucas1032]

I had the same question

[@RallyRat]

Unless the engine block is magnesium, the aluminum pistons will expand and contract at the same rate as the block, so the pistons aren't what would seize in a cold engine. The block would be undersized around the steel crankshaft at room temperature however.

[@silvereith]

@@RallyRat I doubt that the piston rings are made of ally!

[@king-su5uc]

@@overlandwalkabout6376 but the exact opposite was said in the video 🤔?

[@rogerking7258]

2:50 Absolutely love the way you're talking about F1 pistons and then show the combustion chamber from a sidevalve engine in action.

[@RHBTurbochargers]

dont want to be that guy but at 2:54 - 0.15mm is 0.006" (6 thou). also a human hair is about 0.002"

[@riaxrichoffical791]

'Slightly wider' is key word

[@johnchristensen3030]

If the difference between the piston dia. and the cylinder dia. is .006 the piston to cylinder wall clearance is .003.

[@tallinthesaddle1727]

@ 9.18...Wrong. .15mm is NOT 60 thou! No internal combustion engine would run with that much clearance. It would have zero compression. .15mm equals .0059 which is fifty-nine ten thousandths, or nearly 6 thousandths of an inch which is still wrong. It's way too much clearance. Even big American V8s don't run that much piston to cylinder clearance. They run about .0012 to .0016 clearance, or roughly 1 and 1/2 thousandths of an inch for cast aluminum pistons and slightly more for forged aluminum pistons. Check your numbers and your math Driver61!

[@romanroad483]

Also at 2:38 the sketch shows a tolerance of the gudgeon pin hole (wrist pin)of 0.25mm(around 10thou) . Would rattle like mad. Many errors in this vid.

[@dalegribble9101]

lol. 50k? The cnc engineer saw you coming mate. I can create tolerances that good at work on the busted 20year old machines.

[@Conservator.]

I love these videos where you show and explain some of the incredible technical details of F1 cars and engines. Thank you! 🙏

[@justicewarrior9187]

Thanks for explaining how there's absolutely no reason for the piston to cost as much as a Ferrari engine

[@1312_PV]

Yeah, he totally forgot the fact that the R&D cost is divided between few produced units, which is likely the largest contributor to cost. I doubt it costs much more to manufacture an F1 piston than a high-end sports car piston.

[@jdalbion]

​@@1312_PV Yep, also F1 whole engine doesn't cost more than 500k in material and labor, not 7M lol... Especially considering that they pretty much use the same engine from year to year with just small adjustments. And what costs the most is that research, not the engine or parts themselves. If you would put an F1 car in production so everyone can buy, you could literally sell the whole car for 1-2m in mass production...

[@SocietyUnplugged]

Great Video as always. I think this is exactly why durability made F1 actually more expensive rather than saving money. I remember in the V10 era that a rule change mandated the V10 to last for 2 weekends to reduce costs. I'm not sure who it was but some teamboss said, the budget remains the same so each engine will simply be twice as expensive. Before that an 19k rpm V10 "only" costed around 150.000 pound.

[@bigdarbs19]

There are plenty of other components manufactured using those sort of tolerances and materials that don't cost that much. Superbike engines rev much higher. In my experience the cost trebles as soon as its mentioned that its for F1.

[@richardkell4888]

wow ..... 02:12 looks a right old fashioned homemade machine.

[@CODY1989...........]

I like a lawnmower engine...

[@camillecirrus3977]

This might just be one of the most well-made videos i've seen in a while. And that sponsor transition was smoother than even the most perfectly machined F1 engine.

[@philup4947]

But very inaccurate.

[@jackhammer111]

there's a suck-up for ya. A like troll.

[@prdoyle]

If the pistons are siezed when cold, how do they assemble the engine? Do they have to heat the block to put the pistons in?

[@christycullen2355]

@M P well its not. The tolerances are that fine. The tolarances are normally found in air craft

[@jackhammer111]

@@christycullen2355 in piston engines in aircraft? I think not. Same as road cars.

[@chrisdpalmer31]

Most metal's expand when heated above Ambient temperature. Plus most metal's contract when temperatures get lower than ambient temperature. I'm thinking some parts will go in the freezer and some will go in the oven, fore assembly.

[@iangraham6730]

@M P same principle applies..

[@moninum]

Forget it, the piston has allways a smaller diameter than the block. The piston heats up much to higher temps than the block, so it expands more. This guy (61) has no clue what he is talking about.

[@theanimelibarian7881]

That was a smooth transition to the ad I wish everyone else was like that

[@worldhello1234]

@0:06 It is a good reason that it is build to the highest standards, not a good reason for 50,000 quid, since it could be 33,333, 66,666 or 77,777 quid. ;)

[@trackie1957]

Thank you for a good explanation of tolerances! So many people equate “tolerance” with “precision”, when in fact it is a statement of how much imprecision is tolerable.

[@LGSHHS]

0.15 mm is actually closer to 6 thou

[@lornetontegode6986]

Yeah, I was looking to see if anyone else noticed this.

[@tomthumb3085]

Yep, I think they missed that! Even though, even 6 thou seems a bit on the large side, I think.

[@LGSHHS]

@@tomthumb3085 yeah I noticed that too, I would think a close fit for that diameter is like .03-0.04 mm

[@jenniferwhitewolf3784]

He is confused on imperial measurements.. thinks a "tenth" is 1/10 of an inch.. Noooooo... it is 1/10 of 1/1000 of an inch. Not knowing the terms used when he looked things up, created an error of 1000 times

[@ShawnDickens]

Yeah 0.0055" can be a common gap on 2618 aluminum pistons. 4032 aluminum with 12% silicon will expand less and be around 0.0040 depending on coatings on both. If these are built seized then they at most would have that clearance when hot and have negative clearance when cold. This does have me wondering what my clearance is at temp as I only check it cold. Have to look into that next week.

[@vincentwhite7693]

As a machinist with 30 years experience I can promise you that there is some cost-shifting going on with that £50,000 Price Tag...

[@Zohar-Modifier]

Its a click bait ... $50k my ass lol ... Judd and Cosworth would gladly give you the whole F1 engine instead :) for 7million they could give you 10 or 100 in bulk :) crash all you want :)

[@neilmcmahon]

@@Zohar-Modifier I don't think it's 7m for an engine, it's probably that amount per year in design, development, production, and testing etc. for the whole engine allocation for a race season.

[@57thorns]

@@neilmcmahon Sound resonable, and they build and use how many engines in a year? For racing, the limit recently seem to be 3 per driver and year (for 22 races). With two driver per team, and a few engines used for practice and testing, this would be less than 20 engines per team per year. So the total budget would be about 140 M$ for engine development, manufacturing and tooling. Compare this to making hundreds of thousands of engines per year even for a relatively short series of road cars. So the cost for these parts is very much a factor of short series, probably more than the tolerances.

[@brentsullivan2556]

I agree, no way we would have won that quote, just add 500% markup and you'll be good to go.

[@ameraldas3641]

even an ameture machinist like myself could get a .001 mm tolerance with a good cnc mill. at most they could cost $1000, also keep in mind that the honda s2000 has almost the same piston speed as an f1 engine and those are reasonably priced cars

[@degusa1]

Great video, I enjoy your insight into F1 tech and race theory. One note: At 5:44 you mention the effective weight of the piston at 200G is 600kg. Weight (or Force) is measured in Newton’s, so it would be 600N. A more accurate comparison would be to say a 300 gram piston will behave like 60 kilograms; a 200 times multiplier

[@Baboner984]

too bad 1kg isnt 1nm. its around 10. 9.81 to be exact

[@DIOSpeedDemon]

I would love to see the spare part price sheets for these motors , especially when they tear them down for routine maintenance. The engines alone are works of art to me. I love the V-12 motors personally.

[@andythedarkone1982]

Regular pistons do not cost £50 each, they cost £5 at best, an modern ICE costs just over £200 to build, all in.

[@TheCymbalProject]

In reality, I'm not really fan of F1 but I do love exploring the sport's ground breaking technology... Great content!

[@Mr2it3881]

I'm in the US and I love racing but I cant watch Nascar. I like Indy car but F1 is where its at for me. The cars, the people are just so interesting. IMSA is pretty cool so is the LE Mans, those prototypes are sick!

[@rolandtamaccio3285]

So, who else doesn't accept the NON explanation of the price ?

[@jamesscott7527]

Yawn ~ I love when they give some tolerance (200g force) with zero comparison ~ Maybe a standard cylinder takes 180g force ? Sounds more like military pricing than any type of 'legitimate' reasoning. Big Yawn ~

[@rolandtamaccio3285]

,,, NASA, could buy beryllium pistons, tested, on the Space Station, for less than that . I guess Daimler is glad it's a ¥-6, ,,, lol .

[@rolandtamaccio3285]

@@jamesscott7527 ,,, see above .

[@Ecne3D]

those tolerances are not that hard to achieve, also "very expensive materials" which is aluminium? :D

[@Zohar-Modifier]

Judd and Cosworth will sell you F1 engine for price cheaper than 7million in bulk of 100 :)

[@SingleTrack66]

I actually have an F1 piston and con rod from Eddie Irving’s jag . It’s in my shed because the mrs didn’t like it on the mantle piece .

[@michaelhenry4405]

I'm busy with F1 valve design and having the team audit our site next week for production in 3 weeks... I can tell after going through this development why it costs so much. That little piece of the entire engine with only our costs is 130 pounds worth. And I'm receiving the already made valve... It's crazy just listening to what and how F1 engineers think. They are another breed of human.

[@gvare001]

Forged pistons expand at operating temperature, hence why they're always undersized in relation to the cylinder bore, and also why it is normal to hear piston slap when cold on a built engine for boosting applications using forged pistons. The idea of a F1 engine with forged pistons being seized up when cold is a kind of odd, and I think that there is more to the story than being told.

[@dmitryhwguy1646]

Agreed. Why noone talks about this is odd. Modern engines have 0.03-0.05 mm gap between the piston and the cylinder wall. F1 engine has 0.15 mm gap. This is done because the engine always operates at maximum power, the piston is very hot and expands way more. If a road car has forged pistons, it has a bigger gap about 0.07-0.1 mm

[@stratis722]

Did anyone else think this was a Donut Media video at first when they clicked on it

[@nekomimi793]

Yeah like the thumbnail of money pit series

[@JJs_playground]

Lol.. yup

[@automech4315]

People meet what they love and deserve

[@nickegan3988]

Great video! I am a bit confused though. At 0.39 you say an F1 engine is effectively seized when cold due to its tight tolerances. Surely it is tight clearances, not tolerances, that cause this issue. Specifically, there is no clearance between piston and cylinder wall until the engine warms up.

[@scottb721]

Same amount I've spent at Amazon this year

[@300ml_brasil]

50 bucks?

[@dagameboy]

@@300ml_brasil *grand

[@zer0751]

What how

[@procatprocat9647]

You've probably given amazon more than amazon has paid in tax !

[@kosztaz87]

Jeff Bezos thanks you for that.

[@USERNAME1-x5u]

These guys trying to say a piston head is $50,000 should probably not file their own taxes or go grocery shopping.

[@1crazypj]

I think the most fascinating thing about this video is how it's still getting a load of comments 2 years after being uploaded

[@mpuck972]

Way over priced simply due to the application and budget of F1 teams. I used to work in the tool and die industry building molds for plastic parts. Some plastic flows very easily when in a molten state during the injection molding process, so areas where two components come together in order to stop the plastic from flowing (called a shut off area) need to be precision machined. The tolerances in these areas are +.000/-.003 mm and we could hold that tolerance with relative ease. For example, if you have a pair of sunglasses, the two mold inserts that make the concave and convex shape of the lens are machined to the tolerance above in regards to the diameter of the insert. The radius of the concave and convex surface are machined using a process call "diamond turning" which is a highly accurate process of machining a radius. That process could hold a tolerance of +/- .00013 mm. The cost of two of those inserts (a set) was around $10,000 USD. The physical size of these inserts are similar to a piston, however, they were made out of high grade 400 series stainless steel, and underwent special coating processes to help with the finish of the actual optical surface. The estimated cost of these pistons is likely that high because teams need to justify the budgets they ask for, and are simply over priced. It's similar to how a government will spend $500 on a hammer that you can buy from a hardware store for $25! Also, if they were looking for true precision, they wouldn't leave the underside with a cast or forged finish, they would go in and machine that area which would help with a number of things including being able to produce a matched set of pistons in terms of mass and fit. Finally, forged parts will be stronger than machined parts, and machined parts will be stronger than cast parts. It's all about the grain of the material (just like when you see someone break a plank of wood during a karate demonstration, rotate the plank 90 degrees, and he would have a much tougher time breaking it). Forging actually bends the material which allows for the grain of the material to follow the bend, with machined parts the grain remains as it is which makes any bent areas with a grain that no longer follow the bend, and with cast parts, well the grain is going every which way but uniform.

[@tylerboto8930]

Very informative thanks 👍

[@kpsig]

One more thing to consider is that the hourly rate of engineers in F1 is double-triple than elsewhere but aerospace.

[@howardosborne8647]

My vote is with Mike Puckett's view on this hideously high costing estimate. The greatest artistry with these unrealistically expensive pistons is the con artistry to justify that price. Mike I also have previous experience in aerospace engineering and some experience with precision molding dies so everything you raise here I am in agreement with.

[@nssherlock4547]

This is video bogus, most F1 teams pistons are now printed, (LMF) even the pistons we now use in hydraulic lifts are printed. Fine metal powder/dust is laser bonded, micron by micron layer at a time under pressure.

[@ukrainiansincanada3155]

0.3 kg * 200 (g) = 60 kg for each piston... not 600

[@lukasstadler6594]

jup

[@AmNeSiA98750]

x9.81 for gravity. F=MA with acceleration in m/s

[@ukrainiansincanada3155]

@@AmNeSiA98750 so in space there will be no forces acting between pistons and rods if we take same engine and rev it in same way? so how gyroscopes work in space? Or you don't know the difference between mass and weight.

[@Sarruji]

I work on jet engines and I regularly deal with tolerances of +/- 0.001

[@lomdonsreets5350]

I travel on jet engines and I regularly enjoy tolarences of +/- 0.001

[@Sarruji]

@@lomdonsreets5350 I have slept in one and enjoyed the tolerances as well.

[@jackassplus]

Even street engines can have those tolerances. Particularly in the bearing journals.

[@frederf3227]

Jet engines have metal crystal growth bias to minimize clearance. I wonder if F1 materials use this or the temps aren't that extreme

[@jackassplus]

@@frederf3227 crystal domains are an issue particularly in Jet turbine sections because of creep. The spinning blades want to get longer as due to centripetal g loading. ICEs don't have that level of force. (200g vs 20,000g)

[@chrisdaigle5410]

I think he means the cylinder expands more than the piston, allowing the piston to move in a warm engine. It seems to me that a cold forged piston with machining to final dimensions would be the most cost effective when weighing strength to weight ratio. I'm guessing that when they assemble the engine, they freeze the pistons and heat the block to allow them to fit.

[@TwoInTheNeck]

I watched this video twice because I was so intrigued.. Your information and delivery is spot on. Well played Sir. I will be enjoying more of your content.

[@kivimike]

Could you make a video about wheel to wheel battles? About what moves are considered dirty or clean? I think that would be a great topic + it would be cool to see breakdowns of some battles of f2 2020 season such as Mazepin vs Drugovich in Sakhir in the first race. Really liked the breakdowns you did in the past!

[@tomthumb3085]

I’m amazed that there’s as much as 60 thou piston clearance. Was this figure correct.

[@randytremaine1622]

no, typical clearance for a normal engine is @ .003.

[@MrSolarstu]

He got it wrong in the video, it should have said 6 thou.

[@rheesegoodemote4371]

0.15mm is .006 in, not 60 thou as stated in the video, looks like they just forgot a zero in the conversion or some sort of other editing mistake

[@lunkydog]

There are a lot of inaccurate statements in this video. Conversion from metric to imperial just made it worse.

[@lucasschofield8716]

Not a chance, 60 thou is 1.5mm

[@nayr87]

2:52 is credited to project farm, its amazing how many people have stolen that video.

[@SkillzorZ021]

Fair use my dude

[@MrJamesonStyles]

@M P No, PF actually made the polycarbonate cylinder head for a lawnmower engine and used it to film the combustion of various different types of fuels over several videos.

[@1312_PV]

There are tens of stolen clips in his video. Terrible.

[@ctsean]

If you are saying that that clip is actually from a Project Farm video, it isn't. PF does have similar clips, but the source for this one is easily found on Warped Perception's page.

[@nayr87]

@@ctsean the idea not the actual footage

[@swapnade4347]

the only channel where I don't mind checking out the link in description.

[@seanpatterson5574]

The clearances (not tolerances) mentioned are nothing special. Most motorcycles run similar clearances, and a competent mechanic can resize cylinders with a hone and an electric drill. My guess is that most of the cost of the piston is to recover the money spent in development, and in the development of parts that never got sold.

[@1crazypj]

I used to teach it at MMI, had a few students who could hit exact numbers after only a few hours training.

[@ajsteffen41]

How do you build an engine that is seized when cold?

[@wyattroncin941]

Heat up the block (flame heaters or hot water/oil), and toss the pistons (with Conrod in place) in something cold (liquid nitrogen is a common thing to use). Don't touch anything with your hands.

[@overlandwalkabout6376]

Haha, you don't, he got it wrong

[@overlandwalkabout6376]

On the video that is, the comment above is correct in its use of sarcasm

[@devries9528]

Incredible 👍... just learnt new things.. thanks 👍

[@Yamaprilia]

I like this video, Im a precision machinist and I find it very difficult to explain to people why precise machined components are so much more than the junk we see from china. People say things along the lines of "I wouldnt pay £500 for that part, you can get one from china for £10" But if you know engineering you know why it costs so much more for precise UK machined components and why chinese stuff is so cheap.

[@russellpaulsson]

The real reason is that you are not making thousands of the same part. You need to understand that.

[@rcabert70]

Another great video, but still can't find your Cosworth piston design video. Really hope you are able to put it back up for viewing.

[@tmoss017]

I didn't think I'd be this interested in this video. Good vid

[@johndennis3181]

I'm not seeing 50k of work and material. I think these prices are very over inflated.

[@danieljakobsen1289]

+50% of the price is R&D, the engineers who design f1 engines use a lot of time researching how to make every component lighter or stronger just to be a couple of grams lighter than the opponents. But yeah it doesn't look like 50k pistons 😅

[@LoudandProudBSE]

That may be the price per piston when the engineering cost, tooling, and fixtures is amortized in per like the 20 sets they get before they change it and start all over again

[@awellner3285]

Thats the average price for the whole production run including R&D and exotic materials. Production cars have batches 1000x larger than F1 teams so the R&D cost average is 1000x smaller.

[@LoudandProudBSE]

@@awellner3285 yeah exactly. This video only talks about the tolerance which is an extremely small portion of the cost in this case.

[@danieljakobsen1289]

@@awellner3285 where is the exotic material? Just wondering

[@darthvader8433]

Sounds impressive until you look at the revs that mass produced high performance motorcycle engines routinely go to.

[@fightfanian]

I dont l Iike f1 at all, but I love the technology and engineering.

[@andraskovacs517]

@ 5:54, he talks about _rotating_ mass. Well, that matters, too, but in case of a piston, it is the _alternating_ mass which counts.

[@glynndraper437]

Back when money wasn't capped I remember ferrari casting one of Schumachers gearboxes out of a single solid block of beryllium. If you look at a list of how many cars he drove its huge , evolved chassis throughout each season , if he had every chassis in a museum it would be vast and wonderful to behold in my opinion. I'm loving this sort of content , thanks ever so much mate.

[@jakub8860]

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him. And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ. And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No. Then said they unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself? He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias. And they which were sent were of the Pharisees. And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that Christ, nor Elias, neither that prophet? John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose. These things were done in Bethabara beyond Jordan, where John was baptizing. The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world. This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me: for he was before me. And I knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water. And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him. And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost. And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God. Again the next day after John stood, and two of his disciples; And looking upon Jesus as he walked, he saith, Behold the Lamb of God! And the two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus. Then Jesus turned, and saw them following, and saith unto them, What seek ye? They said unto him, Rabbi, (which is to say, being interpreted, Master,) where dwellest thou? He saith unto them, Come and see. They came and saw where he dwelt, and abode with him that day: for it was about the tenth hour. One of the two which heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter's brother. He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ. And he brought him to Jesus. And when Jesus beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone. The day following Jesus would go forth into Galilee, and findeth Philip, and saith unto him, Follow me. Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter. Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph. And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip saith unto him, Come and see. Jesus saw Nathanael coming to him, and saith of him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile! Nathanael saith unto him, Whence knowest thou me? Jesus answered and said unto him, Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee. Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel. Jesus answered and said unto him, Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these. And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man. And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there: And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage. And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come. His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it. And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three firkins apiece. Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim. And he saith unto them, Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast. And they bare it. When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knew;) the governor of the feast called the bridegroom, And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now. This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him. After this he went down to Capernaum, he, and his mother, and his brethren, and his disciples: and they continued there not many days. And the Jews' passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem, And found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting: And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables; And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise. And his disciples remembered that it was written, The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up. Then answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign shewest thou unto us, seeing that thou doest these things? Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? But he spake of the temple of his body. When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said. Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.” Gospel of John - Chapter 1-2, King James Version.

[@glynndraper437]

@@jakub8860 are you f785ing mental ? I think you need psychiatric help or hospitalisation, I'll be more than glad to help hospitalise you , your brain is beyond repair . Go away and top yourself so you can be with your imaginary friend in the sky you total spastic.

[@dominuscircensis3645]

Very interesting video, especially from an engineering standpoint! Kepp up the good work!

[@Cobra427Veight]

I think you need to spend a bit more time on your, math conversions ! .

[@frankburdodrums8984]

I just wanted to say thanks. I don't know how I would be able to sleep tonight without knowing this. This was literally thee most important information I learned this entire year.

[@PossumMedic]

Next year: how to spell "the"

[@frankburdodrums8984]

@@PossumMedic Next time you learn to read English. Thee and the are 2 different words. Open a book on English linguistics.

[@PossumMedic]

@@frankburdodrums8984 did thou learn english in the xviiith century?

[@frankburdodrums8984]

@@PossumMedic Pick up a book on English and Roman numerals, expand your horizons.

[@PossumMedic]

@@frankburdodrums8984 books are heavy 🙁

[@lucifermorningstar1274]

because a guy with a lathe is a good talker

[@talgatmelisbekov3423]

The quality of this video is top shelf

[@jaredvanbergen7904]

Interesting note: The Pistons in the old Cosworth V8 motors would be subjected to over 10000G at TDC when the motor was spinning at 20000rpm.

[@infamousg7207]

Then Cleetus McFarland and Bob the builder get 1000 hp for 10k engine

[@renacimientoargentino7515]

Getting 1000 horsepower for the cheap is easy, just take a low comp LS, and bolt two turbos from a tractor, and some intercoolers Getting 1000 horsepower ,from 1.6 liters, while running at >50% efficiency, and making the engine last 5000KM at full throttle all the time, that's quite difficult

[@marktucker1651]

BS on most of this.

[@addicz2]

How so?

[@StJiub]

Just found your channel a bit ago. Subbed. Interesting vids :)

[@puits-de-science]

Manufacture 100's of them with a cheap process and sort them. They will come much cheaper I think.

[@chronokoks]

Those tolerances are nothing amazing if you're a machinist. It only amazes people who have no idea about machining. Btw you did not correctly explain why they cost 50 000 pounds in this video. You only said they are expensive and gave few very basic inspecific arguments, which hold little water. The materials on this piston are cheap (in comparison to other special alloys that exist) and they are not machined for "hours". These are relatively simple objects, and can be machined relatively quickly. What is the most expensive part on this are the astronomical salaries of the very very skilled and experienced R&D people. So thumbs down. I hate simplistic hype.

[@quistan2]

As amazing as that is. I find it more amazing that my 92' camry has 270k miles on it, will easily log 500k, the whole car cost me less than the price of a set of new piston for a standard car, and when the car finally dies it will not be because of piston failure. Engineering for extremes is interesting, dont get me wrong, but I find it even more interesting that some things that man can create seem to have some self fulfilling destiny, like they are meant to go together because they had to, almost like magic.

[@geniferteal4178]

1:37 Unless you're Ferrari!

[@massari4u]

Very informative video! Thank you for posting