MechYarg's video: • Drone Fuel test compar... Please check it out and leave a like :) 0:00 The Setup 3:21 Liftoff 5:53 Transfer Speed Comparison 7:40 Round Trip Time Comparison
Пікірлер: 93
@gnhatch17 сағат бұрын
Great effort put into a very controlled experiment. good video
@martin-gaming14 сағат бұрын
Thank you for showing the fuel consumption so i can get a better feeling on how much ionized fuel i need. I already knew the speeds and energy value of each fuel type but i coudn't find anything related to drone energy usage or fuel amount per kilometer or sth like that now i know how much it fuel it needs for a pretty large distance. Video came perfectly timed and thanks to the youtube algorithm
@finlay926014 сағат бұрын
@@martin-gaming Nice to hear, happy to be of help! Good luck with setting up your fuel!
@apexmace12715 күн бұрын
Good job man, very good planned video, keep up the work
@landonphillips-de7bk17 сағат бұрын
True just needs to post more!
@WoutLamers24 минут бұрын
Great setup and video, thank you! It's also good to see my gut decision for rocket-fuel-fueled-drones validated. Consumption numbers were also very interesting to see. Thanks again!
@serverdingo4 сағат бұрын
Fascinating. I didn't know fuel affected speed, I thought it was just the burn rate. Thanks for doing this, and love your avatar!
@finlay9260Сағат бұрын
@@serverdingo Thank you, likewise!
@mmcion115 сағат бұрын
I rarely subscribe mid video, or even from one video watched. you sir are the exception. clear video, clear content, no bs, well planned, no wasting time, no promo up to 80% of the video (which is where I'm at writing this).
@finlay926014 сағат бұрын
Thank you so much, I'm really glad you liked it! Don't bother subscribing though, I'm not looking to grow a KZbin channel. Just uploading my personal stuff, and things like this if I feel there's a need for it. Go and subscribe to MechYarg instead :)
@Steampunk_Wizard12 сағат бұрын
I really appreciate this video! As I close in on end-game in 1.0, I've been really curious what the new drone fuels bring to the table, and I wanted to know how the differing flight speeds could affect the fuel consumption of the drones. I'm not sure if it's applicable to all routes, but for yours, I converted the item/m fuel consumption back into MW to compare them: Fuel consumes 171.5MW Turbofuel consumes 195.333MW Batteries consumes 222MW (Although you can't use them for power) Rocket Fuel consumes 225.6MW Ionized Fuel consumes 268.333MW Uranium consumes 250MW Plutonium consumes 250MW What I find surprising, is that (with the exception of nuclear fuels (Rounding errors?)) drones will always consume more power the faster they fly. This seems somewhat self explanatory as it mirrors real life, but it's certainly not what I was expecting from the game. Dividing the MW by the item/m transport rate brings them all much closer, but the trend stays the same. I was hoping that Ionized fuel would burn far more efficiently in drones than other fuels, but it still seems like it is of dubious value beyond jetpack fuel. For me personally, I'll probably end up using Rocket Fuel if I build a lot of drones, as it seems to be one of the best fuels when you consider how easy it is to create each MW with it.
@finlay926012 сағат бұрын
@@Steampunk_Wizard Good stuff! I think the major difference is that, unlike IRL, resourced are unlimited. So if you have the means to craft the better fuel, you can sacrifice efficiency for speed without major drawbacks.
@LordDamokles17 сағат бұрын
Nice comparison. Too bad that you can't really limit the stack size for the nuclear fuel rods.With just 0.01/0.02 per minute it is extremely wasteful to have large stacks in the drones.
@Kutan16 сағат бұрын
But on the other hand, a full stack has the potential to last literally hundreds of hours (especially in Plutonium's case) I'm actually making Plutonium Rods purely so I can just have stacks to manually put into Drones and abuse the hell out of them whenever possible.
@finlay926014 сағат бұрын
I actually forgot to talk about the fuel consumption more, thanks for pointing it out! I guess you can either have a full Nuclear Plant with overproduced rods and use the overflow, or split the rods belt a bunch of times to only extract a small amount for drones. But I agree, it would be nice to have a more elegant way of handling that.
@martin-gaming14 сағат бұрын
@@finlay9260 I mean i sink the plutonium fuel rods so i don't get uranium (or plutonium) waste
@@finlay9260 another option is you can actually get more Plutonium Rods pretty easily. Since the alt Recipe can be made in an Assembler, it makes it a fantastic candidate for Slooping. A couple Assemblers overclocked with Sloops thrown in can easily make a pretty decent number of Rods a minute.
@konraddeak54614 сағат бұрын
Greatly done video! I can see the effort and the time invested behind all this setup you have made, i'm hopeful you will keep experimenting while having fun.
@finlay926012 сағат бұрын
@@konraddeak546 Definitely always experimenting, it's what makes the game fun for me!
@Sevetamryn2 сағат бұрын
Very cool test, this is a very significant difference! Nuclear fuel is a bit nasty i think. So, if you don't want to go for batteries, rocket fuel probably ist the fuel of choice. easy to produce and fast.
@soursylveon47848 сағат бұрын
Very helpful video! For some reason, the satisfactory wiki is very vague about fuel types, and stated that drones could only use batteries, so I went out of my way to start aluminum before I was fully ready. Seeing how innefecient fuel is, I don’t regret establishing a good supply of batteries.
@finlay92607 сағат бұрын
@@soursylveon4784 I highly recommend using the wiki.gg one, not the Fandom wiki. The latter is poorly maintained, and there are tons of reasons to avoid Fandom. Search for Mossbag's video on Fandom if you wanna know more.
@tristanridley16017 сағат бұрын
There are multiple wikis still showing 0.8 information. Drones could use only batteries until 1.0
@27hund12 сағат бұрын
Interesting. Thank you.
@exhale180410 сағат бұрын
Now this is a very good fuel comparison, thank you for this video, you have earned my sub.
@finlay92609 сағат бұрын
@@exhale1804 Go sub to MechYarg who had the initial idea, my video is just a follow-up :)
@exhale18048 сағат бұрын
@@finlay9260 I'll go check it out
@gunjitkumar21 сағат бұрын
Great video man, also you explained really well
@gregglazewski75576 сағат бұрын
great comparison! thank you
@BakaGrappler8 сағат бұрын
Very interesting. I actually have a megafactory in the northern tributary to make use of that wide river for Pure Ingot production. Now that the Peak Uranium deposit has been downgraded I might just make a map wide Uranium powered Drone Network for all my production needs with the Tributary Megafactory as the central hub.
@GokaiGoblin13 сағат бұрын
Very informative, and great to see them visually compared 👍
@nep10625 сағат бұрын
great video, just started using drones so this is very nice to know!
@Hhunted14 сағат бұрын
Nice one, good video. Good illustration. If you look at your usage per round trip the fastest is not going to be the most efficient, which is important when you have a problem with having the drones fueled
@finlay926012 сағат бұрын
@@Hhunted Yup, the efficiency is something I forgot to cover here, but some of the other comments pointed out some interesting things already!
@dacomputernerd40969 сағат бұрын
On the drone port randomly opening. I've seen a few odd animations in my own world. Haven't gotten to drones yet but the trains get funky sometimes. Had it leave the traincar and pick up the box it dumps them in instead once (like, the part of the station) and put that on the train, had a few where it desyncs and picks the cars back up, it's a whole thing
@finlay92607 сағат бұрын
@@dacomputernerd4096 Got it, thanks for the info. I don't mind small visual bugs like these, was just wondering...
@kayzeke85716 сағат бұрын
thank you for making this video
@blueswales999016 сағат бұрын
Thanks for this, really interesting
@NicoBuilds-g3u12 сағат бұрын
Good video! The moment I saw they were in a line, pointing in the direction instead of perpendicular it kind of triggered me, because of the different lengths. But then you mirrored them!❤ Thanks for taking that into consideration. Probably a tiny difference but it would have bothered me, hehe
@finlay926012 сағат бұрын
@@NicoBuilds-g3u Yup! The line setup was needed to avoid differences in landscape, so the only way to keep the distances the exact same was to line it up the same way, first to last and last to first.
@NicoBuilds-g3u11 сағат бұрын
@@finlay9260 ohhhh, you are right! It was pretty clever! I would have made them perpendicular (want to avoid ficsit pilot crashing into each other! Thats not efficient!) And therefore made a worse experiment. Nice!
@jonobrien88487 сағат бұрын
burn rate on the construction page, definitely something they should add!
@Nallenbot2 сағат бұрын
Thanks for the complete absence of nonsense in this video
@finlay9260Сағат бұрын
@@Nallenbot It's the magic of not trying to grow bigger, I literally just wanted to get this video out :)
@Thomas-ld4ie21 сағат бұрын
can they also fly on ficsonium fuel rods and does that make them go even faster?
@finlay926019 сағат бұрын
@@Thomas-ld4ie Nope, drones can't run on Ficsonium as of now.
@pondwtreblex937913 сағат бұрын
If it did it would likely be slower because ficsonium is less energy dense than plutonium
@dimercamparini18 сағат бұрын
Very good video, kudos to you. I thought rocket fuel was slightly better than batteries (like 5-6%, not much but relevant...I tried a very basic comparison in my game and it seems better like that)...but apparently they are basically the same
@finlay926015 сағат бұрын
Yeah, seems like they are almost exactly the same, with batteries having a slight edge.
@martin-gaming14 сағат бұрын
In the wiki they are both listed as 37m/s but rocket fuel has 20% more energy
@shirozoi17 сағат бұрын
Do these stack per minute accurate or they differ in actual no.
@finlay926017 сағат бұрын
From my experience they seem to be spot on, but the drone ports in my actual save are always full to the brim, so I don't know if it stays accurate if you run out of items.
@blockchaaain13 сағат бұрын
I was wondering about this ever since they announced alternate fuel types! I already have batteries and was looking into using rocket fuel. I didn't know they would be exactly the same! Where batteries fit in was one of my top questions about this update.
@juiceguy478416 сағат бұрын
Great test. Good work
@raphlin710 сағат бұрын
You can see the fuel and speed values on the wiki
@finlay92609 сағат бұрын
@@raphlin7 True, but I wanted a visual comparison and look at all the numbers myself, since you can't know if all the info on the wiki is up to date. Also, the wiki doesn't specify anything regarding round trip times, stacks/min, etc. because those depend on the fly distance.
@tzxazrael4 сағат бұрын
very nice. getting close to drones in my playthrough, and i've been wondering about the speed differences myself. personally, i feel like even if the radioactive fuels are much faster, it's probably not worth dealing with the radiation, but that's just my take. for a "more perfect" scientific test, having all of them placed side-by-side would be ideal, though with matched rows at either end, i don't think it would actually make any difference.
@finlay9260Сағат бұрын
@@tzxazrael I might've not explained it well enough in the video, but the reason why I lined them up like this is to avoid differences in landscape. If you place them side by side, the leftmost drone e.g. might fly through a valley or over a mountain that the rightmost drone can avoid, which saves time. In order to make it equal, the ports are placed in the opposite order on the other side, so the first drone has to fly to the last port etc. So I think this should be "more perfect" :)
@tzxazraelСағат бұрын
@@finlay9260 the line vs side-by-side i get your reasoning. i wonder if there's really enough variation in the terrain being crossed that it would make a difference, but whatever. when you say "opposite order" that makes me think 1234 4321 ... which would give drone 4 an advantage over drone 1 because drone 4 doesn't have to fly over the other ports on each pass. i'm assuming you meant 1234 1234 ...? and are just having trouble explaining it
@finlay9260Сағат бұрын
@@tzxazrael Yeah, if you watch the original video by MechYarg (linked in the description), the terrain caused a big issue, though for them it affected the liftoff and landing of the drones. I just wanted to avoid that as much as possible, even though it probably doesn't make a huge difference. And yes, the setup is 1234 1234
@thoriandragontamer141116 сағат бұрын
20 is accurate, and the info you're looking for shows up when you hover it in the build menu, fyi. :)
@finlay926015 сағат бұрын
Yeah, I didn't think about that in the middle of making the video. Thanks!
@thoriandragontamer141112 сағат бұрын
Welcome! :)
@Gazer755 сағат бұрын
Speed and consumption is already listed on the wiki since release.
@finlay9260Сағат бұрын
@@Gazer75 True, but not the specific round trip times, stacks/min etc. since they depend on the distance. I wanted to get a feel for this by doing this test, and to have a visual comparison :)
@Thebuird8 сағат бұрын
I loved being able to beat the game without ever having to create a single battery
@evanherriges404211 сағат бұрын
4:15 that's the manta lol looks similar tho
@Turtle_on_da_skateboard8 сағат бұрын
Wow I never knew that different fuel types had different speeds I thought it was just different consumption ammountd
@tristanridley16017 сағат бұрын
I recently discovered that all my drones should be using plutonium fuel, and it doesn't really cause radiation. Never using any other type of drone fuel again.
@georgehewitt804114 сағат бұрын
Deserve a sub & like - wel done sir.
@finlay926012 сағат бұрын
@@georgehewitt8041 Thank you! You won't get much out of a sub to me, but go sub to MechYarg for the initial idea of making this comparison!
@lordtulkus4015 сағат бұрын
Iv never use Drones but can they use BioFuel? Would be interesting on the consumption levels if so.
@finlay926015 сағат бұрын
They can't unfortunately. The 7 fuel types shown in the video are all the ones you can currently use.
@Sonic70127 сағат бұрын
the actual test starts at 3:30 if you want to avoid the extra talking
@PowerofRock2411 сағат бұрын
I just use batteries. They seem to be a good all-rounder. I don't want drones spreading radiation everywhere, and it seems like a waste of late-game resources. The only time I use fuel to power my drones is when I need plastic and rubber byproducts transported off my oil rig to my train station nearby. I usually have plenty of excess fuel and it's more convenient than transporting batteries to them as I have all the resources for packaged fuel on site. It also frees up more ports at my battery factory for other factories.
@finlay926010 сағат бұрын
@@PowerofRock24 Sounds good if you already had that set up. I didn't have a battery factory, but instead already had a fuel factory that was just waiting to get upgraded to rocket fuel, so that's what I went with :)
@tristanridley16017 сағат бұрын
The drones seem to only pick up a miniscule amount of plutonium fuel rods, so the only radioactivity is the refueling station.
@nArgari9 сағат бұрын
Is'nt there a charcoal drone ???
@finlay9260Сағат бұрын
@@nArgari Not really? Unless I'm missing out on something hidden :D
@gwellsgavin17 сағат бұрын
Can drones run on liquid biofuel.
@finlay926017 сағат бұрын
They can't, the 7 fuel types covered in the video are what drones can use. If you click the little orange fuel icon on the drone port's fuel input, you'll get a list of all the compatible types.
@Fawstah15 сағат бұрын
I thought you could only use batteries for drones, woah
@finlay926015 сағат бұрын
That was the case before the full 1.0 release, where they added the option to use all these other fuel types :)
@martin-gaming14 сағат бұрын
The future is now old man
@goldeneagle2569 сағат бұрын
so, its basically going according to the information put out by the devs. fuel value: speed (m/s) Packaged Fuel 750 25 Packaged Turbofuel 2,000 30 Battery 6,000 37 Packaged Rocket Fuel 7,200 37 Packaged Ionized Fuel 10,000 45 Uranium Fuel Rod 750,000 42 Plutonium Fuel Rod 1,500,000 45 in terms off efficency vs cost to produce, i think ionized fuel is by far the best fuel choice for the drone fleet, and what im using.
@finlay92607 сағат бұрын
@@goldeneagle256 Late-game definitely, though I like getting into drones as soon as I can after completing phase 3 and I often find myself just expanding what I already have. Perhaps one day I'll attempt a switch to ionized!
@tristanridley16017 сағат бұрын
Isn't the cost to produce plutonium roughly zero as it's a byproduct of uranium waste disposal?
@finlay92606 сағат бұрын
@@tristanridley1601 If you see it as waste disposal? Before 1.0 plutonium was the "upgraded" uranium with better efficiency and less waste. Only with 1.0 it's now possible to further process Plutonium to fully get rid of the waste.
@goldeneagle256Сағат бұрын
@@finlay9260 what ive done, i just pick up little extra rocket fuel from my power plant, package it, and send it to a location where i have some shard production going, and turn it into ionized fuel, before spreading it around my drone network. but yea, you cant do ionized fuel before you get to lateest stuff in the game