"We just stalled at high attitude and are making an emergency decent...actually, we seem all good now so we will fly another 5 hours, forget about it"
@deadendfriends19755 жыл бұрын
Over an ocean too. SMH
@antonioporras51615 жыл бұрын
More like ten hours!!
@Halfdead2114 жыл бұрын
First thing I thought...Plane just stalled and was out of control and we don't know why but it's seems ok now ...Yeah were just gonna go ahead and try to fly over the Atlantic ocean... Jesus
@F_Tim19614 жыл бұрын
@@Halfdead211 That's why they are paid so much. To do careful evaluation and make command decisions !
@damachine34 жыл бұрын
@@F_Tim1961 Yep, and instead they did little evaluation and made a stupid decision...despite the fact that all ended well.
@Commandmanhardcore5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for covering flights like these where nobody gets hurt! To some they might not be "as exciting" but I think they are just as interesting or even more interesting! don't stop covering flights like this!
@BillClay885 жыл бұрын
Well if nothing catastrophic happens, it's not that interesting. That's just reality. Most ppl don't want to see something that didn't happen.
@davesmith56565 жыл бұрын
Agree. But stalling, rolling right and left was pretty exciting! Glad the pilots recovered, but I wonder that they didn't notice any control problems after losing elevator tips and access door! Must be the redundancy built into the controls. (The videos that sicken me are the loss of hydraulics at 30,000 feet, or whatever. A doomed aircraft with five to ten minutes to impact. That's sickening. Military aircraft, you have parachutes. Passenger jets maybe you get a free shot of Scotch and time for a prayer.)
@vernonsmithee7925 жыл бұрын
@@davesmith5656 And maybe a quickie from that cute new stewardess 😋
@T0rturephile5 жыл бұрын
I like these. I like happy endings every so often.
@Nonamelol.4 жыл бұрын
Russell Scott exactly.
@robertslydell69904 жыл бұрын
Aircraft registration XA-"DUH" seems a bit ironic.
@peggyl28494 жыл бұрын
I had the same thought :)
@BassicVIC4 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂 And rather appropriate.
@daktarioskarvannederhosen25683 жыл бұрын
@Johnson Fallone how well is it working?
@2wMaliman5 жыл бұрын
Quite the extensive history on that plane. Its nice to see it didn't end on November 11, 1979.
@n.jersey82565 жыл бұрын
Seems like a high risk poor decision to fly transatlantic with an aircraft that just had a major incident and as it turns it significant damage
@dangraham97415 жыл бұрын
thats a sensible observation tho it seemed to continue its journey without any more hiccups .
@larrydavid68525 жыл бұрын
Yeah, pardon my language but fuck that. Dump the fuel and set it down.
@PaulEdgewatertheman5 жыл бұрын
My thoughts exactly. But hey, it's a DC-10? What could go wrong? ;)
@jasonyerian47195 жыл бұрын
DC 10 was the biggest airplane and now they are only cargo planes
@DanknDerpyGamer5 жыл бұрын
@@jasonyerian4719 I'm a bit confused, what is the point of the observation?
@lemao_squash44865 жыл бұрын
Just think about being on a plane that suddenly drops from the sky, but the pilots still decide to cross the Atlantic
@GarrisIiari5 жыл бұрын
As I just replied to someone else, I totally agree!
@thefurbeastunderyourbed50125 жыл бұрын
You won't need no in-flight entertainment, you'll be thrilled for the rest of the trip anyways.
@paulymac55135 жыл бұрын
Nope, I don't have the balls to do that.
@paulymac55135 жыл бұрын
@@fdzaviation If they were half way over the ocean to keep going would be right but I would land it before to get it inspected first and also for the passengers to at least change their pants. The passengers would probably say no thanks and take another flight.
@antonioporras51615 жыл бұрын
Approximately ten more hours in the air (distance from Madrid to Miami is over 5K miles). White knuckles the whole time?
@martinsloan81705 жыл бұрын
Thought this plane was going down....Instead got a quick lesson on the correct way to fly a dc-10. Whew...
@twoZJs5 жыл бұрын
Who would be able to recall to what switch was thrown or lever adjusted to put the 10 back to normal cruise attitude after those panic moments?. Mention DC-10 between a rock and hard-place, and my mind always flips to the 'Iowa corn field event' way back in the days. Geez?
@SuperScottCrawford5 жыл бұрын
Dude! OMG, I had the same reaction. But what's crazy is my comment is roughly identical to yours. Even the "whew" at the end! I typed my comment, then was just scrolling through them and I read yours. I almost fell out my chair, but I wasn't sitting. This means something. You should reply.
@shermankelly90624 жыл бұрын
@@twoZJs GDR, you are speaking of United 232.
@Toyota--Camry5 жыл бұрын
As soon as I saw, “the pilots pull the nose up”, I knew shit was gonna get bad. But then, it just didn’t hit the ground. Great video Allec!
@tjking19095 жыл бұрын
Hummmm, sounds like Air France debacle.
@Toyota--Camry5 жыл бұрын
TJ King Exactly what I was thinking
@dx14504 жыл бұрын
I was thinking it was going to be bad because this was a flight in the 70's using a DC-10.
@nickv37403 жыл бұрын
@@tjking1909 no, Air France happened because the co-pilot excessively pulled the nose up to avoid a storm. That plane didn’t stall until it had reached its maximum flying height. Pilots are correctly supposed to put the nose down, apply speed brakes and auto flaps when the plane is descending in a stall.
@alhanes58032 жыл бұрын
@@dx1450 Yeah because there was 1 crash because of a DC 10.
@paxmaac14 жыл бұрын
That AeroMexico livery is awesome I wish they'd bring it back.
@julosx3 жыл бұрын
It would also be nice if they had better looking aircrafts than the ones they currently have.
@Digitallycloned5 жыл бұрын
Wow I would love to know how many cycles or hours of flight that plane has. A 45 year old DC-10 that never crashed.
@haysfordays5 жыл бұрын
@@sparkyobrian6417 As a person who knows next to nothing about flying or aircraft, I love reading stuff like this. It's fascinating to me that a plane can withstand that many years of stresses. I'm guessing there are structural upgrades through the years?? Or maybe not?
@julosx5 жыл бұрын
@@haysfordays It's all about maintenance basically. You still have DC-4s and DC-6s that are flying despite they were built during or right after the war.
@MrBurndonesinkchair5 жыл бұрын
Federal Express has a few DC-10s pushing 50, still working.
@haysfordays5 жыл бұрын
@@julosx So the guts are the same. Wow. Quite a testament to the engineering all-around. Thanks.
@None-zc5vg5 жыл бұрын
It ought to be preserved but won't be. I wonder if it has all the features (floor-mounted pressure-balancing vents, hydraulic-reservoirs, etc.) that were missing from the T.H.Y. plane that crashed near Paris in 1974, killing hundreds.
@TexanInItaly4 жыл бұрын
Ladies in gentlemen, fasten seatbelts due to an emergency with the airplane. We will attempt to land at the nearest airport. Plane stalls followed by a long dive. 5 minutes later: Hey guys, you still up for Miami?
@SuperScottCrawford5 жыл бұрын
I was like "That sucks. They crashed in the ocean." Next thing I see is it landing. Whew!
@bookeratkins81345 жыл бұрын
In addition to the tragedies, these videos are depressing. 95% of the planes in these videos are written off, stored, or scrapped. Makes me tear up a bit.
@annetteslife5 жыл бұрын
I think you mean tear up. To me these videos are not only in a sense depressing but they are fascinating as well. Thankfully other than a few hundred pairs of pants that were full no one was killed in this
@bookeratkins81345 жыл бұрын
@@annetteslife thank you!
@redwingsfan36215 жыл бұрын
You 2 Flying has always been by far the safest way to travel. Your life is much more, “at stake,” when you’re driving to the airport.
@None-zc5vg5 жыл бұрын
@You 2 It amazes me that pilots may have to go through manuals and checklists in order to deal with an emergency, instead of being able to use just the controls and the information available to them from the instruments, etc., which are in front of them in the cockpit.
@Jeff-ub4lr5 жыл бұрын
Who cares about the planes? Human lives are important, planes are just machines.....
@lindalaw83683 жыл бұрын
I bet the storage planes have great stories to tell each other!
@derbagger225 жыл бұрын
I noticed the narration is longer in these newer videos than the older ones. Not sure if that's because of the incidents being recreated or not. But I do find the wordier ones a little harder to understand.
@andrewk29963 жыл бұрын
Thanks Allec, I also like how you give information on what happened to the aircraft after.
@nenblom4 жыл бұрын
“Everyone survives with no injuries.” Greatest words ever! That plane sure flew for a lot of airlines.
@scottstewart91545 жыл бұрын
When I saw the pilots pushed the nose down I knew it was going to be one of the few videos like this where the plane is not pancaked into the ground.
@MorganBrown5 жыл бұрын
11:18 evidently patete means “hot potato” in Spanish. Nobody kept this plane for long!
@KriegerDelfin245 жыл бұрын
That is not entirely True. Lufthansa Cargo still operates eleven MD 11-F
@synergy60375 жыл бұрын
think he meant this exact aircraft, not the DC-10 fleet in general : )
@JCDofNYC5 жыл бұрын
I know. I half expected the video to end with "In August 2019, the plane was purchased at auction by a guy named Harold," and the signage is just hatch marks over the prior owner's logo, replaced with Sharpie scribbling reading "Harold's plane".
@iaminevitable80455 жыл бұрын
Well they probably discovered Allec's video, and thought Get Rid
@ted.angell76094 жыл бұрын
If I remember right, "The Three Stooges" is translated as "Los tres patetas" in Spanish.
@moriver38574 жыл бұрын
I must've work and rode jumpseat on this aircraft while I was with Emery. Great history and she survived to storage.
@ANTINUTZI4 жыл бұрын
... With all the repainting jobs, I'm surprised it could get off the ground.
@haiwatigere62023 жыл бұрын
Funny funny
@gregmiller71233 жыл бұрын
After the last repainting the cargo capacity was limited to 4 rolls of toilet paper and 6 feather pillows!
@RX7GSLSEowner4 жыл бұрын
Excellent aircraft history at the end. Well done!
@redwood4104 жыл бұрын
Love that the ac reg is XA-DUH!!!! DUH!!! Glad they somewhat caught their mistake. Pilot's aren't always perfect.. Good outcome that could have further harmed the DC-10's record
@johnwatson39485 жыл бұрын
Alec I don't know where you find pictures for each owner of the aircraft but it is amazing -
@AllecJoshuaIbay5 жыл бұрын
All you need is the aircraft's registration :)
@1SqueakyWheel5 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed watching the plane's livery metamorphosis through the years. That progression of pictures is just captivating all on its own!
@BigP19675 жыл бұрын
I worked at the Hub at KDAY for Emery from Dec 2000 to April 2002 and I remember that tail number. I also remember loading belly freight (mostly US Mail bags) into the aft cargo hold while on "Outbound Crew". I worked in "Mod 6", & sometimes would drive a belt loader while working Outbound. It was a great place to work with some really good people.
@byronharano23915 жыл бұрын
Thank you Kuya Allec for this informative video. Your attention to detail Kuya is appreciated. So nice to see aircraft like this DC-10 have long flight careers. In storage 2019.
@Awilgu4 жыл бұрын
Wtf is Kuya? Damn you to hell
@byronharano23914 жыл бұрын
@@Awilgu Don? Are you feeling okay? No. I am washed and protected by the Blood of YESHUA! I reject your curse and may the stone you attempted to roll over me roll back on you and crush you. Are you feeling okay?
@sarahalbers55555 жыл бұрын
Cheers to everyone! Thanks for yet another great vid! These keep getting better all the time!
@Capecodham5 жыл бұрын
What did you do with the time you saved not typing eo?
@sarahalbers55555 жыл бұрын
@@Capecodham happy holidays Burt. Just in case, it's an abbreviation commonly used, for video.
@Capecodham5 жыл бұрын
@@sarahalbers5555 You use the abbreviation because you are so important you don't have the time to type eo, Sar.
@sarahalbers55555 жыл бұрын
@@Capecodham No Burt, i was too busy wrapping your gift and baking you cookies. No, i am nor that important. But I am also not being snide about a commonly used abbreviation.
@Capecodham5 жыл бұрын
@@sarahalbers5555 Commonly? Out of 40 comments where "video" was used in this video two used the term, "vid." Thus only two out of 40 think they are better than the rest. Commonly?
@tomfoolery44975 жыл бұрын
Great job. Good research, and an excellent explanation of a complex issue.
@Ralph24 жыл бұрын
I know I'm 40 years late, but was there no way to provide an interlock preventing the pilots from configuring that mode? Always happy when I see a normal touchdown!
@stretch130MFE4 жыл бұрын
The research you put into these is outstanding. Great job and much appreciated.
@spiritof69862 жыл бұрын
That old girl gave good service.
@leesantos97114 жыл бұрын
The DC-10's were great workhorses, just like the 747 still is ! Too bad they are no longer being built .
@calvindmncn80852 жыл бұрын
Mc Douglas made bankrupt because of DC 10.. If the 747 was the same level of safety as the 737,boeing surely made bankrupt too
@rogerrendzak80552 жыл бұрын
Too bad?? Yeah, too bad they're not KILLING anyone, anymore😆!! Why do you think McDonell-Douglas discontinued that, model?? Wow, another problem with vibrations, on a DC--10's, number 3, engine!! That's a pattern, obviously!!
@calvindmncn80852 жыл бұрын
@@rogerrendzak8055 in fact it's mostly part of time human error, as the cargo door who won't close correctly The motors wich wasn't fix correctly ect
@rinsedpie2 жыл бұрын
Excellent.. a non-fatal incidence.. something to learn from with no deaths
@DirtyRocha5 жыл бұрын
The correct name of the Captain is Rafael Breton Paniagua.
@warrengamameilhardin5 жыл бұрын
Excellent video and analysis. Something about this one is more chilling...the fact the engineers designed a control mode which pitches up a plane with absolutely no feedback or maximum limit is incredible.
@artokiiskinen10584 жыл бұрын
It would have been interesting to hear what happened to the pilots
@jimmycline47783 жыл бұрын
They got a raise! 👍
@johnnash2973 жыл бұрын
This DC-10 was passed around like a party joint.
@mansoormuzamil30374 жыл бұрын
When the Aircraft entered a nose dive. I thought the aircraft will surely crash.But the pilots collectively showed composure and managed somehow.However fantastic research. Keep it up Allec
@d1agram45 жыл бұрын
6:33 “XA-DUH”
@bacchuslax79674 жыл бұрын
Hit the button because I saw that awesome TriStar and the Aeromexico livery. Such a blast from the past. Remember going to Acapulco and PVR with my parents in that plane during the 70’s. Awesome to see this end well
@cryogeneric5 жыл бұрын
It's amazing how long these planes last.
@MikeBrown-ex9nh5 жыл бұрын
If you spent that much money maintaining your car, it would last forever.
@38911bytefree5 жыл бұрын
@@MikeBrown-ex9nh Nope, some airframes cant pass a certain amunt of cycles without cray expensive work. This doesnt happen with Douglas designs. 20 year old 747, 330 etc most be available and "more economical" to mantain. Somehow, Dougls is still going and the others scraped. See the MD-11 66 hour around the globe vid Ufthansa Cargo. You will wonder WHY
@skydancerforever4 жыл бұрын
Love the DC-10, flew on American, United and Northwest. Once flew a fully loaded United DC-10 ( not a seat left) from Chicago to Detroit. We were heavy but that DC-10 rocketed into the sky like no one was on the plane! Engines were screaming. I had American 191 on my mind when we were hauling ass down the runway. Hoping an engine wouldn't fail. I remember we were delayed because United Mechanic's came aboard and went into the cockpit for about 25 minutes to fix something? Must have been ex military pilots because we did some fast sweeping steep bank turns that put you into your seat good coming down from cruise into Detroit. Best short flight i ever had!!
@odinsson2045 жыл бұрын
That could of gone sideways quickly.
@DoubleMonoLR4 жыл бұрын
Could *have*. Just a pet peeve - I think people often write 'of' as we shorten it so often to could've.
@doubledouble41764 жыл бұрын
Great video and great report. Nice to see the pilots were so good at their job.
@espenBredessenJones5 жыл бұрын
always a relief when there is a happy ending.
@gomphrena-beautifulflower-80435 жыл бұрын
Wow! What a tank. That jet had a long, long life even after the crisis. Wondering how many hours the flight crew had accumulated on this type because they weren’t totally familiar with its systems. Nonetheless, everyone lived! Thanks Allec, another Aviation story well done and very well articulated, as usual.😊
@RMAB19815 жыл бұрын
Very accurate video.....on take off you can catch a quick glace of Rhein-Main Air Base which was opposite the Frankfurt International Airport.
@n668dh95 жыл бұрын
You always do a good job on these videos
@MrCrystalcranium5 жыл бұрын
That DC-10 has had quite a life! Probably has a couple thousand pounds of paint on it! (just kidding) It's testimony to the DC-10's ruggedness and design that it was able to fly in 4 decades and might still have some utility left in it. The air transport industry certainly got everything they could possibly expect out of that magnificent machine!
@GarrisIiari5 жыл бұрын
Someone else just posted here that most of those cargo changes were the same owners just doing corporate rebranding as the business grew and they merged with others, not real "transfers."
@typoqueen54173 жыл бұрын
I'm glad the plane made it safely to Miami. I was a nervous wreck just watching and hoping they would. I love a good ending.
@barrywhite91144 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the Explanations of How & Why. They’re Vital to Education & Understanding!
@JupiterMan12.0005 жыл бұрын
This DC10 has a long History Built in 1974 and still flying 45 Years in Service Very Old
@alvaroakatico91885 жыл бұрын
Star 737 Instead of saying ancient, you should say antique.
@ib3kii6645 жыл бұрын
Instead of saying hotel, you should say trivago.
@CHixon4 жыл бұрын
In this depressed economy, It will be scrapped. No demand to justify storage costs.
@widionugroho79175 жыл бұрын
1974 to late 2010' s this infamous crash aircraft still airworthy..mean while the first A380 has been retired..😅
@andrewthomas55405 жыл бұрын
Simple soul. Little things please little minds.
@38911bytefree5 жыл бұрын
DOUGLAS AIRFRAMES HAD NO EXPIRATION DATE. MD-8x SURPASSED THE LIMITS OF CYCLES DURING TEST. THEY QUIT TESTING IT. THEY COULDNT DAMAGE THE AIRFRAME. THEY DID GOOD THINGS APPART FROM THEIR FAILURES.
@DoubleMonoLR4 жыл бұрын
The a380 is a very good plane, it just doesn't suit the market.
@axl16324 жыл бұрын
Good luck trying to make the A380 into a freighter without finished into an “American 587 2,0” chapter, bus boi.
@jornalnumero15 жыл бұрын
0:15 the engine roar are perfect!
@PlanesAndGames7325 жыл бұрын
TF39
@neilherrera54975 жыл бұрын
Excellent video Allec👍✈️
@rsattahip5 жыл бұрын
The DC-10 was the 737Max of the 1970's. It was put into production in a rush to match Boeing and beat Lockheed, whose far superior plane sadly failed to sell well. Despite the Paris crash that killed so many caused by a cargo door blowing out, no one from Douglas was ever sent to prison. The cargo door had failed in testing and had nearly brought down an AA flight from Detroit. Sadly Boeing will also prove that corporations can kill with impunity.
@user-tq1tf6hh9w4 жыл бұрын
The DC-10 was not put into production to match Boeing. It was created pursuant to a set of specifications created by Frank Koch, chief engineer of AA. They wanted something larger than the 707 and 727 but smaller than the 747. It had to have three engines in order to travel over water more than 60 minutes from land (this was before ETOPS or ETOWS engines). Boeing bowed out of the competition as it was ramping up 747 production. Lockheed was by far the better plane and used modern technology. It also was 25% more expensive per unit due to the redundant safety features the DC-10 lacked. The DC-10 was a redesigned DC-8. MD corporate culture at Boeing pulled the same crap with the 737-Max, trying to gussy up an older design rather than redesigning from the ground up.
@4nciite4 жыл бұрын
The 737 Max still pales in comparison to Airbuses problems at the 737 Max could even with the design flaw still be flown safely, with Airbus the pilots are at the mercy of the Flight Control System, that cannot be overrode. Airbuses Flight Control System is almost halfway as reliable as Teslas Autopilot.
@alhanes58033 жыл бұрын
@@user-tq1tf6hh9w The DC-10 was not a redesigned 8. There was no similarity whatsoever, except for both being extremely good airplanes. The last 50 years proved that.
@aviation045 жыл бұрын
It is such a miracle that no on board died, it looked like that was going to hit the ground at 400-500 knots! Great job by the flight crew!
@Nasrul2605 жыл бұрын
Plane: **stalls** Pilot: **pulls the nose up** Me: "uh oh..." Also Pilot: **pushes nose down to recover from stall** *_"That happened in the 1970s"_*
@ScreechingPossum5 жыл бұрын
You wouldn't think this could be said on videos about air crashes and incidents, but... *I get that reference*
@michaelosgood98762 жыл бұрын
What an amazing aircraft this one is- to still be flying nearly 40 years after this 'mishap' is quite remarkable.
@joelopez74594 жыл бұрын
Was not expecting that, that was the best livery aEROMEXICO HAD
@mechcntr71855 жыл бұрын
I love these videos. Nice work Allec.
@neskyz42594 жыл бұрын
It cracks me up that you post a video of an incident where there was no crash, no deaths....and 215 people give it a "thumbs down". Bloodthirsty followers you have here! Keep up the great videos!
@johnmeye5 жыл бұрын
Cool to know the entire history of these planes👍👍
@basilpunton57024 жыл бұрын
No answer to the question: what was the cause of the vibration that resulted in shut down of the engine?
@peteconrad20774 жыл бұрын
Early stall buffet. They thought it was engine vibration
@weaponofmassconstruction19405 жыл бұрын
The aircraft was then sold to (company name) in 2083 and flies daily.
@kentwilliams41524 жыл бұрын
As a private pilot, and having watched many of these videos, it seems that the auto pilot and auto throttle interactions are both quite complicated and IMHO (truly) it would seem better to hand fly the aircraft to the desired altitude and then turn on the auto pilot to maintain heading and altitude until it is time to descend where again they aircraft could be hand flown for descent and landing.
@peteconrad20774 жыл бұрын
No. They aren’t that complicated once you get to know them. Hand flying saps capacity and uses up attention that is better used building wider situational awareness.
@baraxor5 жыл бұрын
Something going wrong with a DC-10 in 1979, and not crashing? Boy, did they beat the odds!
@333anders65 жыл бұрын
except nothing went wrong. pilots were temporarily not flying
@danielhartin76804 жыл бұрын
That's one hell of a chance to take, experiencing mechanical issues then deciding to head across the Atlantic anyway.
@johannesbols572 жыл бұрын
I'm not litigiously oriented, but in this case I would've sued AeroMexico for endangering my life, if I'd been a passenger on this flight.
@davidg52904 жыл бұрын
Love these videos and have watched a lot. This is one that I really couldn’t understand the lingo as I am not a pilot or have any knowledge of flying.
@hellosunshine10905 жыл бұрын
Amazingly durable aircraft - despite the DC-10s other issues. As tough as my classic Benz with 212k miles @ 20 y/o & eager to go more... SO glad all were ok I bet lots of prayers by 300 Souls as they felt the stall...
@ellen-aau4 жыл бұрын
So basically... "pilots nearly murder plane but she lives on to have a long and happy life..." Good lord, I was seriously annoyed with the crew lol
@colered51055 жыл бұрын
Sees dc-10 Hmm its prob gonna crash
@sidefx9965 жыл бұрын
Cole Red Sees DC10 video. Immediately expect moronic comments like yours...
@ThreeStrikes015WW5 жыл бұрын
@@sidefx996 finnaly, a decent comment
@brianthebarbarian78604 жыл бұрын
Dc-10s were built to crash, its a fair assumption
@axl16324 жыл бұрын
Bob the noob and how’s the Boeing 737 max?
@IceFive54 жыл бұрын
@@brianthebarbarian7860 aw man,How about the MAX? or Boeing Are cool?
@polduseri9095 жыл бұрын
immediately after the incident, per order of the captain, all the passengers received for free a beef taco and a shot of tequila
@Giratina19994 жыл бұрын
Somebody’s racist eh?
4 жыл бұрын
That aircraft sure had a checkered life.
@desdicadoric2 жыл бұрын
Interesting to see just how long some of these planes are in operation for. This one is almost as old as me
@Kwantifye4 жыл бұрын
Whenever I watch a video like this, I find that I'm gripping the armrests of my seat and almost holding my breath. So glad nothing happened to the passengers and crew!
@JoshuasPHXAviation5 жыл бұрын
Awesome video Allec! Keep it up. Also I was wondering could you do TACA Flight 390 or Maybe AirBlue Flight 202?
@Anna-ym5mh5 жыл бұрын
Good morning Allec from Frankfurt am Main, excellent video 👏👏 Glad to see everyone survived ❤
@38911bytefree5 жыл бұрын
DC-10 hater coments on any other vid "DC-10 would habe crashed and killed 2000 people". douglas airframes were superior that took all this load, still flew with missing parts and landed safely. That the reason we still have DC-10-30s converted to MD-10 flying. Their airframes exceded the number of cycles tested and still going ... they just stopped testing it. Somehow, the made solid plane. Of course with flaws like any other 60s jets appart from the L1011.
@ywluvstojam5 жыл бұрын
OMG! That takeoff engine roar is AMAZING! AWESOME! 😍❤️✈️
@EphemeralProductions5 жыл бұрын
It seems like people with as many flying hours as they all had wouldn't do something that put them into a stall. Yet that's what they did. I'm sure there's more to it though (I don't know much about flying!) They at least seemed to recover from it pretty well!
@MrCapi555 жыл бұрын
When I saw 318 Kts. for Climbing speed there came an immediate "Master Caution light" in my brain (too much power would be required for climbing). Other factors that you pointed to regarding the relationship between Climb Speed, Vertical Speed, Power & Angle of Attack sure would have been taken in mind by the pilots. Even when they have received the proper training, All these DC-10 Aeroméxico pilots came Directly from Non-Automated equipment such as DC-8´s and DC-9´s, so they "Overconfidence/Misoperated" the automated systems. In Discharge of Aeroméxico´s DC-10 pilots and Maintenance Technicians, I Must Point Out that in more than 15 years of operations in the "Dark Days" of de DC-10, None of Them were Involved in An Accident or Written Off in the History of Aeroméxico. Great follow-up of the aircraft Allec Joshua (Accompanied with Astonishing Photos). XA- DUH (named "Castillo de" Castle of Chapultepec), was the second DC-10 delivered to Aeroméxico in 1974. The First was XA-DUG (named "Ciudad de México" City of México). I Appreciate Allec Joshua, In Deep. Merry Christmas for You and Your Beloved Ones from México City .
@Martin_Adams1845 жыл бұрын
An excellent video, which explains things very well. This is quite a story. I have to admit that, as someone who does not have aviation's acronyms, such as IAS or ATS or AP, under my belt, I had to keep looking up what they stand for. Would it be possible to repeat the meanings of these acronyms in full text occasionally after their first appearance [e.g. "IAS (indicated airspeed)"]? Thank you for such an informative and well-organised series of videos. I'm glad I subscribed.
@RatPfink662 жыл бұрын
Its quite possible. TheFlightChannel does it, albeit inconsistently. They use a footnote style, small text across the bottom of the screen. Of course Allec runs all text across the bottom as it is, unless it takes up a full screen.
@hanoverbill81742 жыл бұрын
To say that plane "got around" would be a gross understatement. I imagine a lot of passengers would be shocked to learn the history of the plane they are relying on to get them to their destination safely.
@mikespencer99135 жыл бұрын
I was expecting the plane to go down over the ocean. Glad I was wrong! Allec, two questions; First, is there an airplane version of CarFax? ;) It's amazing that you can get such detailed history on a particular aircraft. Second, why would AeroMexico keep the plane but give it a new tail number? I mean, besides the fact that the old one was "DUH"! :P
@65SATisfaction5 жыл бұрын
Mike Spencer - There are websites devoted exclusively to “Plane Spotting”, on which enthusiasts post photos and N-numbers of aircraft operating at airports all over the world, and this pictorial information is accompanied by registration history, and such. In the US, for example, all aircraft registration information is publicly available, searchable by N-number, aircraft type, aircraft owner/operator, etc. This is probably the case for many other countries too.
@devinspruill4 жыл бұрын
I am addicted to your videos!!!!
@GroomLeader5 жыл бұрын
Sounds like that DC 10 had a long and distigushed career. And that was pretty ballsy of the flight crew, deciding to push on to Miami, not wanting to waste 140,000 pounds of fuel, which is understandable. Glad to see it all worked out, and nothing more that some scary moments.
@donmccollough32135 жыл бұрын
How many on board? 250 something? Probably would've said " nah, save the fuel....we're good!" You're back in the cheap seats saying "dump that shit and get my ass on the ground!"
@RatPfink662 жыл бұрын
there exist conceivable situations where corporate would go easier on pilots for _actually crashing_ than for dumping tons of fuel or fouling up schedules...that is, as long as there wasn't obvious pilot error or _too_ much loss of life.
@npxmnpxm4 жыл бұрын
Would the passengers have had any idea what was going on? What does a stall feel like? Carnival ride? Free fall?
@joshuapatrick6824 жыл бұрын
Great piloting! I just knew at the beginning of this that it was gonna end in the typical “all on board were lost” situation I’ve come to expect from videos about a DC-10 during this time period.
@peteconrad20774 жыл бұрын
Pretty crap piloting to get into the stall in the first place. Great recovery though, I agree!
@RyanKlapperich4 жыл бұрын
That plane got a lot of paint jobs!
@tiadaid5 жыл бұрын
I remember watching about this flight in an old BBC documentary. I always thought that it was a Mexico-US flight but I didn't realize it was a Europe-US flight! They flew all the way across the Atlantic in a broken plane?
@ODGgaming15774 жыл бұрын
It's very hard to like any tragedy, but I really do enjoy all of your content, it's all in the learning experience after the crash._. Thanx a lot 😉
@FabJK45 жыл бұрын
Love the intro with the aircraft taking off.
@ahuehuete47035 жыл бұрын
I believe that I once flew on that very same jet (Castillo de Chapultepec), many years ago.
@colered51055 жыл бұрын
Thanks for these videos They are very well produced Can you do ueberlingen mid air collision please :)
@richardshiggins7045 жыл бұрын
40 years old and still flying !!
@lisalu9105 жыл бұрын
Allec, you look so young in your profile photo but you have an amazing channel with excellent, high quality content. You are a very talented young man, keep up the good work!
@333anders65 жыл бұрын
King Allec Joshua Ibay does it again with a flawless vid. All hail king allec!!
@ILoveNumbers_MarioFan4 жыл бұрын
Breaking news reporter: “An Aeromexico DC-10 stalled, but recovered without injuries to anyone!” Passengers: That’s bulls***, DC-10’s usually kill people at this rate! Note: This incident happened 6 months after AA Flight 191.
@TakeDeadAim5 жыл бұрын
Research the fate of United Flt 409 which crashed into Medicine Bow Peak in Wyoming in the late 50's or early 60's. It was a DC4 and took a short cut south of the MDB VOR on it's way from Denver to Salt Lake City. The shortcut caused them to slam into the very top of the peak in cloud cover. In fact, people were found OVER the other side as well as on the impact side. The National Guard later had to use Howitzers to blast off wreckage to keep scavengers from getting into trouble themselves. In 1977 I was hiking with my Dad up there and found a spoon (which I still have) belonging to the flight and to this day there is still wiring and small bits that are still in the rubble.