What do you think about today's episode? Do you have HMS Hood in your Port? 📝 Leave us a comment right after subscribing to the channel 🔔 wo.ws/KZbin-subscription Today, we're focusing on the British Premium Tier VII battleship, HMS Hood. She's a British naval legend and the historic rival of the equally famous German battleship Bismarck. For a long time, this swift-going battleship was the biggest, and arguably most powerful, ship in the Royal Navy. 00:00 - Intro. Dry Dock: HMS Hood - British battleship 00:30 - History of HMS Hood 02:30 - HMS Hood - British Premium Tier VII battleship In World Of Warships Recommended playlists: 👁🗨 Dry Dock - wo.ws/34bpBh1 World of Warships is the largest virtual shipyard in the world. The quality of the work performed by our artists improves each year, and the requirements for the accuracy of the models they create intensify respectively. 👁🗨 Naval Legends - wo.ws/2Kharxt Naval Legends is a series about the construction, service, and daring deeds of legendary 20th-century ships. Very few vessels survived World War I and II -- most were decommissioned and scrapped. The Naval Legends production crew travels all across the globe to visit almost every active museum ship and chronicle her story. 👁🗨 Naval Fortress - wo.ws/3wbRm8u Naval Fortress is a video series dedicated to the famous strategic forts and coastal defence fortresses. 👁🗨 In The Ports of World of Warships - wo.ws/3q8uy5w In this series, we'll be talking about the intricate details and exclusive features of our in-game Ports. 👁🗨 Armada - wo.ws/3vjlf3b Deep guides for in-game Warships: history, gameplay tips, unique features, advantages and disadvantages and many-many more! 👁🗨 Head Over Keels Is Back - wo.ws/3Jlgk92 👁🗨 Warships Size Comparison - wo.ws/35Wrsef This is a playlist where we compare ships by class, nation, tier, firepower, etc. 👁🗨 Armchair Admirals - wo.ws/3i9sgPp 👁🗨 Naval Traditions - wo.ws/36Cllbz 👁🗨 1:42 Scale Ships - wo.ws/3teWqqx 1:42 Scale is a video series about the history of ship building in the Russian Empire, which is based on the masterpieces of the ship scale modeling. 👁🗨 World of Warships Movies and Trailers - wo.ws/3ewuN4y ⚓⚓⚓ Keep an eye out on the official World of Warships website: wo.ws/website Quick start in WoWs for our subscribers: wo.ws/yt-gift If you're a console player, check out WoWs: Legends wo.ws/WoWSLegends Twitter: wo.ws/twitter Facebook: wo.ws/fb Instagram: wo.ws/inst #worldofwarships #warships #wows
@Gordon5194 жыл бұрын
DETONATION
@tidehunterzamora93154 жыл бұрын
No.. can I have one?
@hansgunsche24604 жыл бұрын
1. "You recreate ships accurately", yeah we all know how good you are at that. Horrible would be an understatement. 2. First you call Hood a cruiser then a Battleship. Do you even do any research before making these videos? Doenst seem like it as Hood was a Battlecruiser. Look shit up Before u make a video where you say shit that not even close to reality. Quote. "She was well armored" Yeah lets just neglet the FACT that she had NO Deckarmor when put in service.
@frostedcat4 жыл бұрын
@@Gordon519 your joke is lame, sod off
@ProHunter124 жыл бұрын
Why no comentary on german ships in dry dock
@tommyleesheils20614 жыл бұрын
My grandad served on the HMS Hood, 1936-1941. Went down with his ship
@frostedcat4 жыл бұрын
who was he ? there's a list of hood's crew you know
@loclam37914 жыл бұрын
Frosted Cat I’m not sure that’s a good idea to ask someone in their family name, that’s went into a war and never came back, but tigerloaf game can say it’s he want to
@johnthatcher23494 жыл бұрын
I watched an interview with 1 of the 3 survivors. Interesting but very sad
@isharveerdhillon83484 жыл бұрын
@@johnthatcher2349 where did you watch the video i want to watch it
@patricklenigan43093 жыл бұрын
@@frostedcat and what did he do on board?
@freddieellis84494 жыл бұрын
We accurately recreate them to their original blueprints... Yet we give Hipper 10mm less armour because reasons.....
@errornamenotfound25134 жыл бұрын
"elegance is not just for show"
@dutchthespitfire32043 жыл бұрын
Is that a Azur lane reference?
@dutchthespitfire32043 жыл бұрын
Hell yes it is
@tawelwchgaming89574 жыл бұрын
"We recreate ships accurately, according to their historical blueprints" Agir and Siegfried begs to differ
@LiamTheLegend4 жыл бұрын
Nevermind them, you can see rocket launchers in the friggin video here on the model
@Blueman-in3lv4 жыл бұрын
LiamTheLegend the hood did have rocket launchers for anti air, although they weren’t very effective. They called it the unrotated projectile. It was put on many other british ships as well like hms nelson. But they were all withdrawn in 1941 because they were unreliable and ineffective
@LiamTheLegend4 жыл бұрын
@@Blueman-in3lv Wow the more you know. Thanks for that info that's actually elic
@CloneDAnon4 жыл бұрын
When did those ships exist?
@LiamTheLegend4 жыл бұрын
@@Blueman-in3lv Know if there were any on HMS Rodney?
@McBruch4 жыл бұрын
When they say:“It’s all good in da Hood“ but you know the fifth salvo of Bismarck is on the way Sorry but that had to be said Still though Hood is a beautiful ship
@Gordon5194 жыл бұрын
DETONATION
@derrickstorm69764 жыл бұрын
Nice one
@kyleborboranmain82953 жыл бұрын
Imagine If HMS hood have the 18 inch gun from HMS furious bro so overpowered
@bigmac33733 жыл бұрын
@@kyleborboranmain8295 G3 battlecruiser moment
@GaryJones694203 жыл бұрын
@@bigmac3373 K2 Battlecruiser moment
@reg1mbald2943 жыл бұрын
HMS Hood is a beast for this reason: she's got an AMAZING angle of rotation for her aft turrets! You can angle yourself to take minimum damage and make an 8 guns salvo, I'm glad I bought her, no regrets! :)
@ayan81702 жыл бұрын
Good ammunition protection specially for Fireworks.
@dontran391 Жыл бұрын
For Britain's BattleCRUISER, HMS Hood was surprisingly longer & have MORE TONNAGE than all of Britain's Battleships. She was definitely bigger than HMS Vanguard (where the Vanguard Class is already Britain's largest Battleship); but Hood is only a Cruiser & is bigger than all the Battleships of Britain.
@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 Жыл бұрын
The "battlecruiser" was on account of her speed. At the time of her construction she could go "toe to toe" with any battleship in the world, having both the firepower and armour to trade blows with allcomers PLUS she could achieve nearly 32 knots at a time when most capital ships could only achieve 23 knots.
@RedditzGG4 жыл бұрын
Oh It's Hood Hood: Wargaming, thank you for covering me, Here, have some Tea
@bhishmaMbt4 жыл бұрын
😘😘😘
@SwankySpitfire4 жыл бұрын
The description literally says quote: "Today, we're focusing on the British Premium Tier VII battleship, HMS Hood. She's a British naval legend" SO MAKE A NAVAL LEGENDS ABOUT HER! OR AT LEAST WARSPITE!
@haradimitroula31754 жыл бұрын
Fucking say it.We get naval legends for the fucking soyuz class which none knows about, and im a nerd in naval warfere and not a single word about the might of the queen elizabeth class battleships or the hms hood and/or renown classes
@danishkfd4 жыл бұрын
@@haradimitroula3175 hms hood was the glory of royal navy but still little was serviced
@haradimitroula31754 жыл бұрын
@@danishkfd if is the so-called "little" 20 fucking years, then i dont know the ammount of carrer u consider big mate
@kulot-ki1tu3 жыл бұрын
hood was like the yamato, largest ship of its respective navy yet saw underwhelming action, if they make a legend for yamato they should do hood or atleast warspite
@dutchthespitfire32043 жыл бұрын
@@kulot-ki1tu Hood literally survived multiple U-boat attacks and sunk french battleship Bretagne
@jakubslavik55952 жыл бұрын
Hms Hood, the ship with greatest tea making facilities.
@t.gojirafanstudios58534 жыл бұрын
Hood is a great ship and a great battlecruiser I like the ship a lot but I dont like that She got one hit by bismarck in her Ammo rack but still she is a great Battlecruiser. And A Great Episode World of Warships I am a big fan of you.
@Gordon5194 жыл бұрын
DETONATION
@sander64383 жыл бұрын
It was 3 shells one in the 4.7 inch magazine 1 above the main tower and the third in the main magazine
@RekhaSharma-wg4kr3 жыл бұрын
Why do people always keep giving the excuse of one lucky hit. I mean it doesn't matter how Bismarck sank Hood what matters is He did sank her.
@keighlancoe59333 жыл бұрын
@pAtRiCk StAr she could have taken on the Bismarck, Hood wasn't a paper tiger by any means, in fact she was the best ship the British had for the job; her guns could have caused devastating damage to the Bismarck if only she could have landed a shot. The main problem was her rear deck armour had not been upgraded (the front section had, and would have survived the hit) so she was especially vulnerable to plunging fire. Unfortunately because the government of the time didn't want to spend the money on upgrading her armour, they paid instead with the loss of the ship and all of the men inside. Prince of Wales managed to damage Bismarck and put a few holes in him, and she had inferior guns to the Hood. Bismarck was formidable but not invincible and he had some glaring flaws in his design as well. One was especially fatal, if the Bismarck took a hit to his stern section there was a chance it might break off due to a design flaw in construction that greatly weakened the stern (Bismarck's stern ripped off as he sunk due to this design flaw)
@keighlancoe59333 жыл бұрын
@pAtRiCk StAr PoW actually managed to shoot a shell straight through the Bismarck all the way out to the other side, kinda mad when you think about it. Had it actually blown up inside of the ship as it was going through it could have done a hell of alot of damage, luckily for Bismarck it didn't. Hood did have the biggest and most deadly main armament on offer of any British vessel though, and if she managed to land a salvo, it could have done some devastating damage to Bismarck, however it wouldn't be like when Hood blew up and I think nothing less than a modern anti-ship missile or a nuke could actually make Bismarck sink without the direct aid of its crew, but she could deal out enough to knock out his main gun battery's and cause serious blowy-upy issues for Bismarck's bridge and Admiral Lütjens. But yeah, ideally she could have had more support with her as she was far more likely to be the one to to blowy-upy, I'd say PoW and Hood were nowhere near enough to take on Eugen & Bismarck and they should have ambushed both of them with as many ships as possible. I'm not sure what ships were immediately available and in the area so there is that I guess, maybe PoW and Hood were the only ones there who could intercept them in time to try and strop them before they got to any civilian shipping. I know HMS Norfolk was in the area, and while a completely outclassed WWI era ship her extra guns and being a general annoyance could have helped somewhat, even if only as a sacrifice of sorts
@MrHowardMoon3 жыл бұрын
WG: "We recreate ships accurately" Literally half the Russian tree never existed lol
@vespelian57694 жыл бұрын
The most beautiful steel warship ever built.
@Matteo-ks6fn3 жыл бұрын
Astonishing graphincs as usual, whith precious detail of watery reflects on the decks. What a wonderful ship she had to be.
@ploppysonofploppy60664 жыл бұрын
Might have been worth mentioning that Hoods post Jutland re design added 6000 tons, a significant percentage. She never handled as she should, quarterdeck frequently awash.
@jamesbergquist82804 жыл бұрын
Thank you WoW, I love the way you combine historical records & photos with the game... Well done! Do not have the "HOOD"... Perhaps someday if the grinding doesn't get me first! lol
@Straswa3 жыл бұрын
Great vid, Hood is among my favorite British warships.
@grandad_poi67044 жыл бұрын
*Cue the unoriginal detonation jokes*
@HeIsAnAli4 жыл бұрын
_Bismarck: Hood_ was always _FUN & ENGAGING._
@reeeec3 жыл бұрын
bismark_: receives "devastating strike"
@tanjianyumoe5700 Жыл бұрын
The HMS Hood was kind of destined to sink due to its very weak top, which was also why it sank. The top area was thin and weak
@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 Жыл бұрын
How "thin" and "weak" was it?
@Speedbird205 Жыл бұрын
well thats wrong do ur research right next time alr?
@bored-z2397 Жыл бұрын
@@Speedbird205i mean it's true, do your research as well
@-ZM_Gaming-3 ай бұрын
Drachnifel put this one to bed
@Aelvir1142 жыл бұрын
Now if you guys could make a Hood with her 5.5” guns and torpedo-tubes, that’d be greeeeat
@ozkanbiryan45344 жыл бұрын
0:12 Where can we find that book ?
@auntieh.47844 жыл бұрын
Wargaming Headquarters
@pipecuu3 жыл бұрын
@@auntieh.4784 heist time
@cookoo4cocopuffs2214 жыл бұрын
0:34 The BATTLEcruiser Good thank you very much
@kkhagerty63154 жыл бұрын
The most beautiful battleship ever built
@kmsbismarck1372 жыл бұрын
Purely subjective.
@TheSoling274 жыл бұрын
Hood has Port and Starboard torpedo tubes -- which should be in game -- like Nelson/Rodney forward tubes -- lets start a petition
@kennyforgot834 жыл бұрын
hoods torp tubes where useless in real life, and if i recall they where fixed mounted so you had to move the ship to aim them and their speed was also another issue
@lewisshaw12424 жыл бұрын
24 knots speed for 4km and 40ish knots for 2 km
@s.31.l504 жыл бұрын
Kenny yeah but it would be an awesome meme weapon
@thatguyonyoutubemk27464 жыл бұрын
@@kennyforgot83 Imagine the satisfaction of landing a hit with one though 😂
@Knight68312 жыл бұрын
@@kennyforgot83 The Torpedoes were more likely intended for sinking Merchant ships during commerce raiding
@geoffburrill98504 жыл бұрын
Such an amazing ship, very well modelled.
@wilsthelimit4 жыл бұрын
I miss the Mighty Hood, deserved a Refit and a fair fight
@gfdx32144 жыл бұрын
I have a scale model of the hood, its a really beautiful ship and it was fun to make
@CloneDAnon4 жыл бұрын
Hood is going to be a hidden gem for tier 7 ranked.
@dutchthespitfire32043 жыл бұрын
If Hood is played right its a monster
@viettrungnguyen12424 жыл бұрын
Admiralty: The Mighty Hood is unsinkable. Bismarck: Hold my blood and iron.
@mikecamp2364 жыл бұрын
Kriegsmarine: The Bismarck will be unsinkable! Royal Navy: Hold my Flag and call the boys.
@connor658thepagan84 жыл бұрын
Terror of the seas
@AyushSingh-ny2id4 жыл бұрын
@@connor658thepagan8 Sabaton refrences I hope
@connor658thepagan84 жыл бұрын
It is
@HeIsAnAli4 жыл бұрын
Ark Royal: Come on! I just want to thank Bisko for giving Hood a _FUN & ENGAGING_ time!
@davidmanangan26304 ай бұрын
Apparently,there was supposed to be 3 more Admiral-class battlecruiser like Hood,but the other 3 ships were suspended as the material and labor required to complete them were needed for higher-priority merchantmen and escort vessels.
@k9tirion9274 жыл бұрын
It would have been interesting if Hood was modernized (that was long overdue) before encountering Bismarck, might have been an entirely different outcome.
@frostedcat4 жыл бұрын
debatable. she would still remain vunerable to the detonation, but not rushing in will allow the brits to have a chance to cripple the bismarck, and buy time for the norfolk and suffolk to arrive
@jkN13374 жыл бұрын
Not really
@kkhagerty63154 жыл бұрын
Frosted Cat they had to rush in given the circumstances, Hoods deck armour at the time was only 3 inches at the most and 1 inch most places. Hoods belt armour was the same as the Queen Elizabeth class which could resist 15 inch shells so the idea was to get close enough to use her main belt and avoid plunging fire
@kkhagerty63154 жыл бұрын
Jaurl Z tell that to the warspite
@frostedcat4 жыл бұрын
@@kkhagerty6315 yes, that's the point. with the refit she still remains vunerable to the detonation.but at least the deck gives some immunity and allow holland to not rush in and find range more precisely
@sander64383 жыл бұрын
0:32 hood was the longest warships untill the yamato came was the longest and when iowa came she was the longest ship
@BellaZuikaku47856 күн бұрын
Actually, I read both Hood and Yamato have a similar length from stem to stern. And actually your wrong, it turns out Hood is the longer warship and she’s 873 Ft long while the Yamato is 863 Ft. She’s literally 10ft shorter then Hood And even tho the Iowa is longer, 887 feet, most of the modern ships like Iowa, Yamato and even other warships like Hood had their lengths mostly roughly 800-895 ft
@cd65834 жыл бұрын
0:33 wait mighty CRUISER hood? wtf
@achieveunlocker69994 жыл бұрын
I Just Love The Background Music Is From Dancing Line
@9a-14-juandinhara44 жыл бұрын
Hood:exists Bismarck:I’m about to end this mans whole career
@Gordon5194 жыл бұрын
Detonation
@张桓瑜4 жыл бұрын
Laughs in Swordfish
@stbg17194 жыл бұрын
You know actually fairly acurate which is surprising when all the miss-info about the Hood out there, WG clearly used accurate sources like the Hood Assosiation website, they have her armour thickness correct and are correct that for 20 almost 21 years she was the largest warship in terms of length and one of the most powerful in the world, and though she was classed as a battlecruiser by the time she entered service she was essentially a battleship only classed a battlecruiser in speed, as the RN at the time classed capital ships over 30 knots as battlecruisers, as a few comparisons the QE Class a tough class of ships their main belt was only 1 inch thicker than Hoods at 13 inches, also their armour to weight ratio was about 34% Hoods was about 33%, compare the Bismarck Hood was actually pretty even and IIRC in places better protected, another comparison the Renown a true Battlecruiser her belt was only 6 inches thick half that of Hood, Hood was indeed a Battleship in every respect but speed she was basically one of the first Fast Battleships another comparison Vanguard both Hood and Vanguard were similar with similar speed but Vanguard was classed a Battleship as due to progression by that point even battleships that were fast were no longer being classed battlecruiser but battleship, had the Iowa's been in RN service the RN would have classed them as Battlecruisers due only to speed, the simple way to put it is Hood proved that a Battleship could be both well armoured but also fast before that was a thing, also side note Hood was not destroyed via a deck penetration she was too close for that and even if she was her Armoured Decks added a total of 7-8 inches in thickness and would most likely have been enough to stop the shell, it was more likely a pen through her upper 7 inch belt armour (above the main 12 inch) into an extended 4 inch magazine that was extended in the late 30s meaning there were shells outside the protective zone of the magazine this ignited and spread to the after 15 inch magazine causing the explosion, also Hood turned onto a miss, at the time German Battleships really weren't that accurate and the shell was on a course to miss the Hood, Hood began her turn unknowing that by doing so turned into that shells path sending it from a miss to a hit, a hit to an area on the ship probably the size of a cupboard, had Hood not turned when she did or was in her pre 1938 configuration she would most likely have received little to no damage continued to fight and the outcome of DS would have been her different.
@stbg17194 жыл бұрын
@@After_Pasta Ah you don't like Historic fact?, 1st the reason Hood didn't his Bis is because she wasn't shooting her she was targeting PE, PoW scored a hit to the Bis that caused extensive flooding and forced Bis to have to cut short her mission and return to German occupied Fance, you say could hit both Hood and RN well RN wasn't the name of a ship it's short for Royal Navy... Bismarck was ordered not to engage British warships unless unavoidable, Bismarck was based on the old WW1 Bayern design and really was not as powerful or super as is made out in reality she was not as accurate as made out, yes she made short work of Hood because she got lucky with that pen if you looked into any reliable source you'd soon learn that, you say the RN would have been next without a challenge, let's examine that after the Hood was sunk the RN had 13 Battleships still in active service (5 QE, 4 Revenge, 2 Nelson and 2 KGV) Bismarck was damaged to the point her mission was cut short and abandoned from damage from just 1 of them 13 Battleships with 1 14 inch shell, then she had no fighting chance against 2 Battleships, let alone the Cruisers and Destroyers that were also present or the Aircraft that crippled her further, so no the Royal Navy wouldn't have been next without a challenge when 1 battleship with gun problems was able to cut short her mission then a plane with a single torpedo further cripples her then 2 battleships turn her into a bringing wreck finally being sunk by a cruiser, these aren't opinions they are historical fact that is all out there, your clearly a Bismarck lover and I'm sorry that historical fact isn't what your opinion is but facts are facts, your the one talking 'rot' so before commenting maybe go and do some actual historic research and don't come out with all this baloney...
@stbg17194 жыл бұрын
@@After_Pasta Not triggered the Hood was sunk that was just unlucky more o do with the fact that there is still loads of miss info about the Hood going around which is simply not true. When you say Hood simply didn't have what it took, this is one of them miss info that goes around about the Hood, in reality she was more that up to the task she was still one of the most powerful ships in the fleet and had constant refits that allowed her to maintain that title for near 21 years, however one such refit did create the weakness that caused the explosion, Hood had the same firepower as the QEs and in fact her guns were slightly different all 15 inch gunned RN warships mounted the Mk1 15 inch guns in Mk1 gun houses whereas Hood mounted the Mk1 15 inch guns in Mk2 gun houses and in terms of armour she was more than capable and was on par with the QEs her belt was only 1 inch thinner (12 inch main, 7 inch upper, and all 3 armoured decks above the magazine's added to about 7-8 inches of armour but deck armour is not a relevant statistic when talking about her loss as the range she was at would have made a deck penetration not possible) the problem that Hood had at DS was she incorrectly targeted Prinz Eugen not Bismarck (PoW correctly targeted Bismarck) by the time Hood realised the incorrect aim and went to correct it it was too late, the Hood had began turning and that shell was now on a direct impact course for that weakness that was created in that late 30s refit, take into account Bismarck would not have been at her most accurate as her radars where out of action after being knocked out by the concussion of her main guns (When she fired at the shadowing cruisers earlier on, also why PE took the lead), but in terms of Hood she was probably the most sensible choice for such a mission, a Battleship with good firepower and armour protection but was also fast (on me classed a BC due to speed as the RN back then classed capital ships over 30 knots as BCs regardless of armour thickness) look at Vanguard her and Hood were very similar but Vanguard classed a fast battleship mainly due to the term battlecruiser sort of evolved into fast battleship (after all Hood proved a BB could be well armed and well protected while not sacrifysing speed before that was even a thing) same reason why I say if the Iowa's had been in RN service they would have been classed BCs they were faster than 30 knots at the time the RN classed such BBs as BCs same would probably be true if Bismarck was RN, PoW also defiantly had what it took her problem was mechanical problems (the 14 inch guns were a new gun to the RN not to mention the quad mounts were also new) so due to the new gun system they still had what is best described as 'teething problems', and ended up jamming (the reason she smoked and retreated no point being there if she can't fight, no point losing another ship, her damage was actually minimal) however before her guns did jam she got that critical hit on Bis that ruptured her fuel tank and caused extensive flooding which put Bis down by the bow (fuel slick helped find her again) however after the problems with the 14s were figured out they became one of the best naval rifles in used during WW2. You could say Bis got unlucky with that torpedo to the rudder while turning, long story short Hood was more than up for the job, was well protected and armed but just got unlucky at the worse time to a weakness not there before 1938 and being in the config she was before then she'd probably have survived, PoW had gun problems and Bis got unlucky with the torpedo hit, sorry I got a bit snappy, the amount of miss info out there and constantly see it just winds me up not because of the person commenting it's not their fault most sources spread the miss info but the source spreading that miss info, the Hood Association website (official website for the official Association with people who served on Hood, Ted Briggs that last survivor of Hood to pass away was for a while the president of the Association) there's also the official Hood Association Facebook page with many of the Hood Association members there where your able to discuss Hood, her service, her statistics, armour etc and the battle of DS along with experts and people who study Hood etc. But majority of the info can be found on the Hood Association website, however the people of the Association FB group are kind and informative can help identify the year of a photo, a part of the shop and much more both are reliable sources with reliable information and members which is pretty self explanatory being official Hood Association sites but I'm rambling now.
@frostedcat4 жыл бұрын
@@stbg1719 stop, the guy ios just trying to save his face. why humillate him any further ?
@stbg17194 жыл бұрын
@@frostedcat I was't intending to humiliate lol, if he doesn't want to believe historical fact thats his prerogative I'm not repeating the same stuff over and over again lol.
@dutchman7216 Жыл бұрын
I truly hope whoever wrote the material for this little video. Please understand HMS Hood was a battle cruiser not a battleship he referred to her as a battleship at least twice.
@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 Жыл бұрын
If I call you a "banana" does that make you a banana?
@dutchman7216 Жыл бұрын
@@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 of course not.
@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 Жыл бұрын
@@dutchman7216 After her redesign while still on the slipway Hood possessed the same armour protection as the contemporary RN "Queen Elizabeth" battleships which was FAR in excess of the previous "Lion" "Tiger" "Indefatigable" and even "Renown" class battlecruisers. Does that fact count for nothing? As Shakespeare's Juliet put it "What's in a name? That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet". In other words something "is" what it "is" regardless of what we choose to call it. HMS Hood was a "battlecruiser" with battleship armour and battleship firepower BUT was 7-8 knots faster than the rest of the world's battleships in 1920.
@icetea1455 Жыл бұрын
@@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 hood armor is 305mm belt on QE and R clAss is 330mm. If she have that kind of armor she wouldve lost some speed.
@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 Жыл бұрын
@@icetea1455 You're forgetting that the belt armour on the QE's and Revenge class was vertical... Hood's was angled outwards at 13° which gave the equivalent of 13in of belt armour.
@champagnegascogne97554 жыл бұрын
Elegance isn't just for show.
@justinschauwecker6 ай бұрын
Hood had a crew of 1,418. Only 3 survived.
@liamegan11844 жыл бұрын
Love this series, keep it up. :-)
@haradimitroula31754 жыл бұрын
Wish they were recreated really accurate
@HarunaKaiNi4 жыл бұрын
You're right Why isn't it ripped in half
@haradimitroula31754 жыл бұрын
@@HarunaKaiNi any time she fights a bismarck she has to detonate😂😂
@frostedcat4 жыл бұрын
@@HarunaKaiNi very funny. at least she had a more glorious career than the ugly haruna
@haradimitroula31754 жыл бұрын
@@frostedcat well she was the might of the royal navy.Poor russians wouldnt even imagine to ever have such glorious vessles
@frostedcat4 жыл бұрын
@@haradimitroula3175 yeah, indeed. one lucky hit and those wehraboos go crazy
@NicholasPaulBernardo-wv2ok4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the info of the ship
@DimoB84 жыл бұрын
The man who killed you is my hero!
@kylespringer23553 жыл бұрын
Was sailing in my Bismarck just yesterday and came across a broadside Hood halfway across the map, fired a salvo and nailed a quad citadel that nuked the ship instantly. Immediately sent a message to the victim that said, “ Ahh...history is repeated”. “Sod off” was his reply. I think he was British 😂
@-ZM_Gaming-3 ай бұрын
Dam... History repeats itself, even in wargames
@HighCalibr3 жыл бұрын
"Decent anti-aircraft armament" Doesn't even talk about the fact that she has *rocket pods* as AA guns and can take down and entire squadron of *tier 10* planes
@reeeec3 жыл бұрын
Hood comes with a certian flag when you play the game
@diegosilang48234 жыл бұрын
USS Mount Hood indirectly named after Samuel Hood, suffered an ammunition explosion, huge loss if life.
@finol61274 жыл бұрын
J B when you involve a Volcano and an unlucky name in naming a ship it isn’t going to go well.
@lxmedia39114 жыл бұрын
I could only imagine manual loading on those guns. Must be a big exercise routine for the sailors.
@finol61274 жыл бұрын
LX Media it’s not literally the sailors carrying shells, it’s done through the use of hoists and pulleys.
@BenTheTiger1314 жыл бұрын
It’s HMS HOODY
@Smuggerino4 жыл бұрын
Does it come in two parts?
@perlasandoval78834 жыл бұрын
So her majesty's ship hood is a balanced battlecruiser in wows amazing but eh i need speed so i focus on japanese destroyers or cruisers
@どーどー-n9w4 жыл бұрын
I want to watch more Dry Docks
@rollsross85704 жыл бұрын
Since WoWs isn't about historical accuracy anymore (the Soviet line alone is a proof of that) you could make a version of the Hood after the refit that she was supposed to get but never got, make it replace the old Hood, or if you really want to milk the money just make it a completely "new" premium
@frostedcat4 жыл бұрын
or make her a nice tech tree ship for the future battlecruiser line
@bandog32144 жыл бұрын
What about USS Bunkerhill?, i think it should be added as a premium ship.(Im still new on the game so i dont know much, maybe the carrier is alredy in the game)
@finol61274 жыл бұрын
Black_Puma 98 an Essex class was in the US tech tree until the CV rework. Now the only Essex class remaining is the Premium USS Enterprise which is no longer on sale. I doubt they would add Bunkerhill a relatively unknown ship but the return of USS Essex is expected.
@skies30083 жыл бұрын
i am still wondering something Why does the HMS Hood has AA missiles
@pilotmix.2317 Жыл бұрын
Unrotated Projectiles
@reee59634 жыл бұрын
I always thought the Hood was a heavy cruiser
@charlesdelacruz70754 жыл бұрын
THAT BATTLESHIP IS GOOD
@j.varcano17084 жыл бұрын
The Hood that I know is Blonde, Elegant and like to drink tea
@velkoz1104 жыл бұрын
Hood one-sama
@owenjohnson93254 жыл бұрын
weeb 🤢
@kmsbismarck1372 жыл бұрын
Another one of those "individuals" that like to make anime girls out of perfectly fine ships...
@adamdubin12764 жыл бұрын
If only Hood had been properly modernized... that battle would have been so different...
@stefans.86724 жыл бұрын
No, it would propably not have been. She was an old, worn down ship with mechanical issues, 25 year old armour techology which had to go fight a ship 20 years younger with guns that could have even penetrated her 12 inch belt if she had completed her turn. She was outmatched by bismarck in every way. If she were accompanied by a worked up ship, so maybe KGV insted of PoW, then things might have been better but she still would have had the worse hand to play.
@Xadiac3 жыл бұрын
@@stefans.8672 i guess its why he said if it was modernised?
@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi37232 жыл бұрын
29 knots was here top, the fastest battleships ever known from WW2 were the Iowa class being in 1st place and the Bismarck class in second place more exactly the KMS Tirpitz as it did reach 32 knots, That underbelly paint job has got to go,
@Legion64 жыл бұрын
Hello, my name is Bismarck. Hood: Ho shit
@Rex_the_Badger4 жыл бұрын
shame she's pretty much useless in the game, even the gimmick that was originally used to sell her (the Def AA) is now defunct. she could really use some love (as could the Vanguard for that matter!)
@MRx360004 жыл бұрын
Brett50 Indeed... Her selling point was that shot no fly zone, and that guimick is long gone now >.>
@kagakai77294 жыл бұрын
What about the eight guns with the best penetration angles in the game with quick turret traverse and very good accuracy What about the fact that she has the second best armor scheme at t7 with the highest go She has plenty going for her
@DaManBearPig4 жыл бұрын
Lol get in line
@Rex_the_Badger4 жыл бұрын
@@kagakai7729 best pen angles with some of the worst pen/ Krupp makes her pretty feeble, Quick turrets are not something special to Hood and the armour means nothing when the ship herself is huge and the citadel is easy to hit, i'd rather take a ship with trash armour but underwater citadel, then most shots will just overpen.
@kagakai77294 жыл бұрын
@@Rex_the_Badger her fuse and penetration were normalized to standard 380mm performance a *while* ago, my guy
@techsupportmr94094 жыл бұрын
Montana: im still waiting here
@constantinethegreat67133 жыл бұрын
From elegant lady to Royal Navy's sea monster
@prisuners62754 жыл бұрын
Saw one of Hood player several days ago, and guess what? The Hood was detonated by a Bismarck in some lucky salvo. History tends to repeat itself, I suppose..
@_Meriwether4 жыл бұрын
Citation needed
@thatguyonyoutubemk27464 жыл бұрын
I main Hood and I am happy to say that I've never been sunk by a Bismarck 😁
@sinisabalentovic96174 жыл бұрын
I am also Hood player and i sink the Bismarck couple of times!!!It al about how you play it!!!Hood is a beast of a ship when used how should be !
@IndrawanGamingStudio4 жыл бұрын
I wish WOWs adds Illustrious, Unicorn, and Akagi as well
@USSAnimeNCC-4 жыл бұрын
Ah yes that'll be nice
@prisuners62754 жыл бұрын
We only need Akagi, since Unicorn is mostly a resupply CVL during the war and Illustrious is quite redundant since we already have Indomitable
@lxmedia39114 жыл бұрын
@@prisuners6275 Set Illustrious as a premium ship for those pixel ships collectors. There Wargaming! A way to profit.
@theliquor64233 жыл бұрын
Realism? There's so many examples of ships in this game with extra or missing armament... For (one) example, Where's Hood's torpedo tubes? 🤷♂️
@itsjames46402 жыл бұрын
it's something called balance
@PhucNguyen-me9zk2 жыл бұрын
is still game anyway dude is game balance you should have know that
@itsjames46402 жыл бұрын
@@PhucNguyen-me9zk who knows ask wargaming 🤷♂️
@deluca10314 жыл бұрын
Bismarck:What a nice ship you got there,would be a shame if someone *Destroy It*
@frostedcat4 жыл бұрын
horrible battleship you got there, would be a shame if obsolete torpedo bombers mission kill her
@deluca10314 жыл бұрын
@@frostedcat Yeah I have Shitty AA
@frostedcat4 жыл бұрын
@@deluca1031 horrible armour, too. bismarck's guns are good, but that's just it
@deluca10314 жыл бұрын
@@frostedcat Actually it has good armour,when the last battle with the Royal Navy,The Bismarck keep afloat even though has been turned into hell The Only reason Bismarck sink was because It was Scuttled by the Crew itself
@frostedcat4 жыл бұрын
@@deluca1031 good armour, compare to what ? go read phoenix_jz article
@K8774 жыл бұрын
Do about Hakuryū ... I mean, Shinano
@peottoterlanger5259 Жыл бұрын
Die armen Matrosen.Waren doch nur Kanonen Futten.
@halolime1174 жыл бұрын
i like the bullseye on the turret. I can sink it easiler with my Bismarck
@张桓瑜4 жыл бұрын
Hood is the best Royal Navy girl, unless you prefer tsunderes.
@EthanPhillipps4 жыл бұрын
A man of culture
@obiphil86723 жыл бұрын
Hood had gotten everything except luck!
@justavideo63244 жыл бұрын
Bismarck: Ahh shit,here we go again
@scorpio8716Ай бұрын
The mighty HOOD
@Han_Ji_Ye4 жыл бұрын
HOOD : England Tier 7 firewood.
@ruslina.sinurat4 жыл бұрын
Um.. will submarine come to blitz too?
@kkhagerty63154 жыл бұрын
MrBatuBara YT a few years probably, we just got British battleships, next will be Russian BB’s then submarines
@unidentifiednobodyabsolute47533 жыл бұрын
Hood is a Religion lol
@hmshood17573 жыл бұрын
I can confirm this haha
@unidentifiednobodyabsolute47533 жыл бұрын
@@hmshood1757 Lol
@HMSHyde022 жыл бұрын
very much confirmed
@kmsbismarck1372 жыл бұрын
It seems my work is not yet finished....
@Dan-pf1jf Жыл бұрын
@@kmsbismarck137 *fairey swordfish noises* it is now.
@donkkim733 жыл бұрын
Oldies are not always goodies.
@commandernightstrike4 жыл бұрын
behold the mighty HMS HOOD
@drae21734 жыл бұрын
0.34 so this is a CRUISER eh? okay WG
@jakegrant56983 жыл бұрын
Uh, yeah lol, it's in the name. Battlecruiser
@hanbyeouljang67564 жыл бұрын
Hood needs a buff
@senagi13663 жыл бұрын
we recreate ships accurately according to their historical blueprints and send them into battle THE MIGHTY CRUISER HOOD" "In world of warships hood is a t7 premium battleship" 0:15-0:36 2:30
@jakegrant56983 жыл бұрын
A battlecruiser is a type of cruiser, yes, but in the game, hood is more similar to battleships than other cruisers.
@AzureProject4 жыл бұрын
I wish I got the Hood tho
@f18_lovermacdonald-doaglau694 жыл бұрын
0:35 *battle cruiser
@jakegrant56983 жыл бұрын
A battlecruiser is a type of cruiser
@shahdangalahad6984 жыл бұрын
Wow the eldest Battleship.
@thatguyonyoutubemk27464 жыл бұрын
Eldest? Hardly.
@jakegrant56983 жыл бұрын
@@thatguyonyoutubemk2746 one of the eldest by WW2, and very active until her sinking
@thatguyonyoutubemk27463 жыл бұрын
@@jakegrant5698 one of, but I'm pretty sure that she wasn't in the top 3 oldest by ww2. Pretty sure that honour goes to the Renown Class (Ik its not a battleship but neither was hood officially), QE class and the Revenge class
@jakegrant56983 жыл бұрын
Yeah, you're right
@MikelH0 Жыл бұрын
@@thatguyonyoutubemk2746 what about Uss Texas
@arquebus774 жыл бұрын
I wish you guys would get rid of the scaffolding sitting next to the larger ships in dry dock so I can see the hull shape better. Also could you please change the lighting in the Designer's Table. The light comes from behind from a lamp so the side of the ship toward the camera is dark. I like to sit and admire the ships in my flotilla and I am unable to see the whole ship in dry dock or Designer's Table.
@crgkevin65424 жыл бұрын
Have you tried the designer's table? That's one of the best ways to see hull shape IMO, since the ship is placed on a model stand.
@arquebus774 жыл бұрын
@@crgkevin6542 thats what I meant by 'desk dock', Im going to edit my post to correct to use the correct name.
@劉濬-e9c4 жыл бұрын
Glad to know that azur lane is gonna have the third captain package running in the armory soon =) hope hood is there as well so imma sail with her on herself lmao
@prisuners62754 жыл бұрын
Hook me up on the info, mate
@99batran4 жыл бұрын
Noice
@tantanagojo2624 жыл бұрын
It 's sad the hms hood sunk during 1941 those god dang germans with there bismark
@jvtagle3 жыл бұрын
Best Azur Lane doujin
@-ZM_Gaming-3 ай бұрын
Shes sfw too, GREAT
@derrickstorm69764 жыл бұрын
AA defense is pointless to mention anymore 😷
@crgkevin65424 жыл бұрын
Sadly true. I remember the old days when Hood was first added. I used to be able to completely demolish entire squadrons in mere seconds as they passed overhead!
@raulalexandrubota4 жыл бұрын
Yeah true I remember when even Gneisenau was great at dealing with the planes... now the game balance has been thrown out of the window.
@Miko-st7nu4 жыл бұрын
i didn't get anything on the roulette number i chose came out!!! ...... no comment
@netbol-pv5xp4 жыл бұрын
And that's kids is why you always use the anti detonation flag
@美國球-y6u4 жыл бұрын
Pay attention to its anti-aircraft gun...
@SlickCookie4 жыл бұрын
Royal Navy: “We have the best ships in the world!” Kriegsmarine: “Hold my beer”
@pilotmix.2317 Жыл бұрын
Kriegsmarine: Guys look at our state of the art ship. Really good. Definitely not a rewarmed ww2 design. Uh why is it too heavy. Uh.... Heavier better yeah definitely. Stop being a casual and watch drachinifels videos on bismarck.
@user-ym6jk2fh2h4 жыл бұрын
HOOOOOOOOO OOD!
@kmsbismarck1372 жыл бұрын
I supposed 20 years of experience doesn't necessarily matter, now does it? Schade!
@usssouthdakota55412 жыл бұрын
I've heard of you, I was still being fitted out when you sank her, hehe
@garrettledford11474 жыл бұрын
-Cruiser -Ship of the line I don't think those were the right terms to use wg