Dumbest Arguments of the Year

[@planetpeterson2824]

What’s your favorite terrible argument?

[@xadiergarcia2663]

"why monke?"

[@Tony-w2j]

​@@xadiergarcia2663It's a 2 hour video? How you have the answer already is beyond me.

[@The_New_UG]

Double D's presup word soup...it's delicious

[@planetpeterson2824]

@@Tony-w2j that quote doesn’t appear anywhere in the video

[@RunQC]

My favorite terrible argument is that the adaptation we see is actually evolution not adaptation by loss of information. Those that are not educated in a biological science think evolution and adaptation work by the same mechanism.

[@GunnerHeatFire]

Love these “best/dumbest of the year” videos, please continue posting them. Praise spanky.

[@Sergei_Mn]

Hail Sagan!

[@moxbroker]

"It's just a theory!" Is always a hilarious argument from people who proclaim how smart they are.

[@Truthorbust]

The problem is that it's being reinterpreted as if they said, "it's just a scientific theory." That's not what they said. They said it's just a theory. On the Wikipedia page for theory, it says near the top that a theory can belong to a scientific discipline, a non-scientific discipline, or no discipline at all.

[@moxbroker]

@Truthorbust the thing is, it's a scientific theory, not just a theory. They like to say "it's just a theory" as if there isn't a mountain of scientific evidence supporting it. A scientific theory and "just a theory" are two very different things. See, colloquially theory means hypothesis. In science a theory is the best explanation for a natural phenomenon supported by repeated testing and data. It's not a guess or a hunch.

[@cosmonaut9540]

It’s the battle cry of the dumb dumbs

[@XtreeM_FaiL]

@@Truthorbust There is no problem unless you're an idiot. Theory of gravity or theory of evolution is not "just a theory", not even in everyday talk. Every time some one say "Theory of gravity" it means scientific theory of gravity.

[@ItsgamingJake]

The conversation that started at 11:30, you're an absolute saint for remaining calm LOL.

[@leamael00]

I can't even begin to imagine how many IQ points the editor lost

[@planetpeterson2824]

yes

[@ryanknight199]

Like brain cells against a cheese grater.

[@zerothehero26]

Lost it at "You can't have negative iq points Tanner..."

[@jdhorror]

I was smoking a joint when that line had me dying laughing! I wish I knew that burn in grade 5 lol.

[@tysongalloway5700]

He set himself up for that one.

[@coffeemakir1977]

When the guy said he had objectionable views 😂

[@uzi98mc]

Man, a two hour compilation of condensed stupid, peak entertainment

[@Omachronic8326]

I actually can't believe he read the definition of a pure substance, thinking I was the definition of composition of matter 😂😂

[@GAm3r52]

Take a shot every time Eric says "so the question is"

[@ThorsDecree]

💀

[@zacharyberridge7239]

My poor liver!

[@eukaryote-prime]

I would like to survive the day thank you

[@nightlydrugs6927]

We all died

[@Cocytus127]

It’s worrying that you’ve been able to compile over two hours worth of Duning Kruger in action.

[@DiegoMorales-wn1jp]

"Do you know what 'inertia' is, bro? "MY BICEPS ARE BIGGER THAN YOURS"

[@ryanknight199]

Argument invalid guns too greased.

[@Naptosis]

I THOUGHT YOU WERE BEING FACETIOUS 😂

[@psychoticgod5035]

Would he be a good detective if he saw a body and said, "I have no evidence of who killed them, but god told me who did it." Oh! Wait, someone tried this with cards before, and she got sued for blaming an innocent woman online.

[@hopmajibhohepeajibho7595]

I have no evidence but Jimmy revealed to me that he did it and because he won't confess in a court himself I wrote his confession myself

[@psychoticgod5035]

Dam... that's undeniable proof right there

[@Soapy-chan]

"look it up on google, don't trust me" ok, so when I google if evolution is true, and it says yes, then what would he do?

[@Soapy-chan]

@@catpoke9557 oops stupid typo

[@TeagueisTrash]

“Chinese people didn’t have a concept of human rights” is the most terrible racist shit I’ve heard in the past 15 minutes. As a Japanese person even though my country hasn’t always upheld them, human rights are a very important thing in asia! Just like it’s serious in the west!

[@Soapy-chan]

i mean human rights arent that important in china, india and north korea nowadays... what we should take away is that humans always were and always will be complex beings and some societies disregard human rights and others don't, independent of "race"

[@TeagueisTrash]

@ remind me again which country doesn’t consider water or food a human right 🇺🇸. I’ll have nothing if your “easterners are primitive and savage Hitler people” bs that you Americans spread

[@gwanael34]

Or South Korea too with the current martial law

[@TeagueisTrash]

@@gwanael34 South Korea has always been a fascist puppet of the United States

[@hasanmuttaqin464]

​@@Soapy-chan >says absolutely racist stuff >"independent of any race" my guy doesn't even realize that undrraged grape victim in texas needs to marry their offender and can't dismiss their marriage beofre 18 because they're below the age of consent if i were a woman, i'd rather march down roads in seoul with a big feminist logo on a banner than stepping foot in south america, at least korean wouldn't rip my womb and splatter it on the floor first before killing me

[@TheInterestingInformer]

I lost about 17 years off my life and 33 IQ points in the first 18 minutes. I’m about 3 minutes away from an aneurism. My blood pressure is 483/201.

[@AdamEdn]

I applaud your optimism.

[@Nelsonstephenson7654]

That first guy is setting the bar high for the rest of the video. “You have no evidence.” Lmao the irony

[@white_isnt_a_race2338]

Its amazing how many times people think they are correct when they also think scientific theory is just an unproven concept

[@bighomiemike5675]

the entire composition of matter section was the most infuriating interaction i’ve ever heard. he literally was reading random stuff off of google not even knowing what it meant

[@GeistView]

Just like Flat Earthers when they ask for "Proof" they really mean "show me something that agrees with my worldview", a moving goal post. It's always wise for then to explain what that "proof" is. That way as the before mentioned "moving goalpost", cant pop up.

[@jr-pn1dt]

"I can hear both of your brain cells playing ping pong inside of your head" "Yeah it is" 😭😭😭

[@alexritchie4586]

"Evolution is false, and here's why; * talks about Lamarckianism *" Every. Fucking. Time.

[@shiina29]

Oh, come on. They've got "we didn't come from monkeys," too!

[@emuman09]

" when we find the ice wall" wonder where that guy is since the final experiment happened

[@Soapy-chan]

23:20 i dont understand how people cant grasp how ridiculous their beliefs are when you hold a mirror up to them

[@purrlionpony9317]

Using their own arguments against them does make it more dumber they think it is

[@shanegreer1947]

How utterly stupid do you have to be to think the best argument is "I don't need the science behind it dude"?

[@MindForgedManacle]

Logic refers to either the rules of correct reasoning or rules which preserve the designated value (usually "true") across transformations of propositions. It does not rely on minds. It's mathematics.

[@Soapy-chan]

and even if it relied on minds then it would rely on ours and not a god's

[@Monstermunchies]

This is the most hilarious video ive seen for a while, brilliant!

[@jakstrieder]

ok that last guy has got to be the funniest cause he's so dang sheltered he didn't even know what Root Bear is

[@NoGodsNoMasters-o1u]

These are ALL my favorite bad arguments, because they demonstrate, thanks to the internet and our understanding of relativity, that even the most slow-witted buffoon can be completely wrong at the speed of light.

[@shiina29]

When you lose comparing brains, suggest comparing biceps.

[@fridgeman]

A 2hr Planet Peterson compilation? My day is made

[@sebben13]

24:00 Now that is pure gishgallop, he just started rapping trying to match the Rap God pace 😂

[@Bruujah]

I love when these buffet bandits say " its just a theory" they instantly loose by saying that.

[@TeagueisTrash]

Morality wasn’t taken from religion, religion was created after the fact and is influenced BY morals

[@145pajamas]

Which came first, chicken or the egg?

[@101stub]

​​@@145pajamasthe egg. If we are talking about hard shelled eggs, early reptiles were the first to lay them. If you want to go back further, fish laid eggs, just without the hard outer layer. So, depends on your definition of an egg. And correct Teagueis, before the Israelites began to dictate their laws, Sumeria, Babylon, Egypt and others had already written laws, which included murd*r, theft, r@pe, among many others. Many of them are quite similar to the laws dictated in the Torah. Without morals, even tribal societies fall apart, hence why even in the most primitive tribal societies that exist today have laws and morals, even if their morals and laws are different to ours.

[@FlappySock]

@@145pajamas The egg

[@vaskovallidis552]

​@@FlappySockThere are two types of people

[@Naptosis]

Inventing someone invisible that is always watching and judging you, and is eager to punish you for all eternity, seems like a smart way to reduce the incidences of vioIence/thieving, in an age where it was very difficult to be certain someone did something, unless you caught them in the act. Even psychopaths _might_ think twice about doing something malicious if they think they will burn perpetually for it.

[@jwomackandcheese73]

10:56 Does Homeboy understand that money, the pledge of allegiance, and the Constitution are different things? And that items one and two have nothing to do with item three?

[@lunalegion]

A movie length video? I’ll go get the popcorn.

[@jasoncraig2281]

“You have a potato fallacy, once again.”

[@KirinDave]

I'm still not quite sure I can believe Peterson can make such a perfect crickets noise with just his mouth.

[@markvonwisco7369]

I wish I could do that!

[@spunkyj9642]

"Let's compare stomachs" killed me 😂😂😂😂😂

[@markvonwisco7369]

Just bros doing bro stuff. Nothing wrong with that, totally not gay! 💪💪😂

[@wsheasley]

18:00 this guy is so insufferable its unreal. Everything he called you was what he was being the living definition of

[@emuman09]

😆 the consisten way he says " you viking!" Its almost as if he's clicking a soundboard every time

[@jasoncraig2281]

DON’T MAKE ME SHOW YOU WHY I’M THE ALPHA!

[@eukaryote-prime]

This is like a masterclass in arrogant Dunning-Kruger… edit: man that fast talking guy was really annoying

[@okiedad5784]

@1:12:40 the stupidity of this caller is outright painful "Mammals are animals that eat meat" wtf

[@FSP_RAPTOR]

32:09 can we compare biceps is crazy 💀

[@whofxyt]

This is so funny, this feels like a compilation of frustrating moments in your life

[@theanimestarter1697]

The crickets always kill me 😂

[@cosmonaut9540]

I’m jealous of his cricket powers

[@sparkyskraps9]

Potatoes are fruits.. I mean VEGETABLES!

[@seljo]

19:49 "the essence of butthole" 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@johnferry7778]

“Don’t make me show you I’m the Alpha” now that’s funny!

[@scorptrio8231]

What kind of uniform do presups wear? A theotard.

[@antoniusgrave1348]

10:20 “god’s written into the constitution” 😂 The greatest lie theist makes about America.

[@chimchu3232]

I'm convinced most of them don't even know what the constitution is. 😂

[@Naptosis]

​@@chimchu3232Americans literally go to _other countries,_ commit petty crimes, and then shout at the local police officers about "The Constitution™", their "5th Amendment right!" to ignore the officer, and the classic "I'm an American!" when the police officer pulls them over / asks for ID / requests they use their inside voice, etc. So I definitely believe many Americans know the word 'constitution', but can't spell it, nor know anything about it, other than the first three words, and that they think it _gives_ them rights they can use anywhere, like buffs in a video game. 🤔

[@MurderCraw]

Idk about favorite argument, but "all dogs go to hell" is my favorite belief to hate. Edit: Aha, found my favorite dumb argument! That humans aren't animals. 😹

[@ThorsDecree]

"Are humans vertebrates?" "No, we have vertebrae."

[@planetpeterson2824]

that guy also gave us, "Me: there's no evidence of creation. Him: okay, such as?"

[@101stub]

​@@planetpeterson2824such as .......... 😂

[@markvonwisco7369]

"Parabolic language!" 😂😂😂

[@George_Coddiwombleton]

Just look at the trees man ! 😂

[@alphaalvey5029]

lol pls make a “how to” on that cricket chirping sounds🤣

[@muhtorbek1998]

We need planet peterson out of context compilation

[@Robisquick]

Clitler, as the kids like to call him… HILARIOUS

[@TheRealestBubby]

This was a fun watch, absolutely insufferable, but fun. Thank you for taking on random cult members whilst somehow remaining cordial

[@GriffonSpade]

8:10 He is indeed very simplifying. I don't think he could become any more simple-minded.

[@S-Magma1215]

30:03 No! Stop! He sounds so sad and defeated i just want to give him a hug! 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺

[@WhoThisMonkey]

No alpha's don't need hugs 😂

[@Grimm-3000]

I wish I could have half of these conversations

[@EricusXIV]

📊 Comparing stats for Joško Gvardiol and Andrew Robertson: Defensively, Joško Gvardiol outshines Andrew Robertson. Gvardiol averages 1.1 interceptions, 1.6 tackles, and 2.6 clearances per game, significantly higher than Robertson's 0.4 interceptions, 1.4 tackles, and 1.1 clearances. Gvardiol is also tougher to beat, being dribbled past just 0.3 times per game compared to Robertson's 0.6. In duels, Gvardiol demonstrates superior strength, winning 2.9 ground duels (60%) and 1.4 aerial duels (57%) per game, compared to Robertson’s 1.8 (55%) and 0.2 (43%). Additionally, Gvardiol is more secure in possession, losing the ball 8.1 times per game versus Robertson's 11.1. Offensively, however, Andrew Robertson has the edge. He boasts 2.19 expected assists (xA) compared to Gvardiol’s 1.97 and has created 4 big chances to Gvardiol's 1. Robertson is also more effective with long balls, delivering 2.2 accurate attempts per game (50%) versus Gvardiol’s 1.4 (56%). Moreover, his crossing ability stands out, with 1.2 successful crosses per game (25%), far exceeding Gvardiol’s 0.2 (25%). In summary, Gvardiol excels as a defensive powerhouse, showcasing solidity, aerial dominance, and careful ball retention. Conversely, Robertson thrives as an offensive playmaker, leading in chance creation, crossing, and long-ball precision. Sofascore rating: JG 7.38 vs AR 6.79

[@bellywood7688]

Bit too early for this vid ya still have another month of stupid to choose from😂

[@planetpeterson2824]

What I'm actually doing is best of Planet Peterson 2024 in 3 separate videos. This video covers May-Aug. Sept-Dec will come out in a few weeks.

[@zacharyberridge7239]

​@@planetpeterson2824imaginary God bless you!

[@ItsRJC123]

YOU VIKING! How dare you

[@ferretfather2000]

😅😅😅Peterson deals with so many frustrating people😅😅😅

[@LanceHall]

Lol 'space Hitler'

[@doranku]

needs a nukular facepalm warning.

[@daredoggo]

This is the dumbest person I've head this month. How did I know he was from Florida?

[@KirinDave]

Whew, thank goodness the music is back.

[@razior100]

This videos makes my blood boil and im just listening, i dont know how you can endure so much quantity of stupidity. You have my respect, Peterson. I need to know if you find a way to detox your brain for that amount of insanity.

[@zacharyberridge7239]

Lol! Clitler!

[@evilmeerkat007]

Am i wrong in thinking the composition of water does change? H2o isnt stable and makes h3o aswell? Or we just mean its H and O?

[@stormburn1]

I'd say it is by definition. If the composition isn't water, then it's not water. In other words, if A is A, then A cannot be not-A. If A were to change, A would no longer be A. It's a bunch of silly nonsense that only makes sense if you ground it in reality, but then you get fuzziness. In reality, it's more like "We call the matter in this space A. If the matter occupying this space changes sufficiently that it no longer is meaningfully equivalent to the properties we attribute to A, then it is no longer A. Thus, so long as we have a defined reference point, our definition of A does not change and such the composition of anything defined as A cannot change." It helps to think of language in terms of the inherent tradeoff between precision and accuracy. The more precise a statement, the less accurate it is in reference to reality. The less precise the statement, the more accurate it is when describing reality. Balancing the two comes down to utility, whatever goal the speaker aims to achieve and how well the statement serves achieving that goal.

[@eukaryote-prime]

Anybody know what book they were looking through that had no equations?

[@jeffsole8653]

some of these are just the absolute worst. ugh

[@d614gakadoug9]

The Plane of Inertia is the space in which the Azimuthal Grid of Vision is found. Geeze. Everyone knows _that!_

[@SchiwiM]

I'm really losing hope in humanity with these people 😑

[@bribro23]

18:21 “that’s why you just googled it to make sure you weren’t wrong on the stupid ish your saying “………….if he was making sure he WASNT WRONG how is that saying stupid things. if he’s NOT WRONG &backed up by his google search?!?

[@ThinkerT]

I think the point at 1:07:00 could be a bit more nuanced with regards to whether a person in a vegetative state is an atheist. I personally subscribe to the opinion that to lack a belief something has to be capable of that belief in the first place, otherwise it's a category error. For example, a rock isn't an atheist, because a rock isn't capable of holding a belief in god-ascribing atheism to a rock is a category error. The argument then becomes whether a person in a vegetative state can have a belief in anything. Being a human means that they're capable in general of holding beliefs, but their current condition precludes them from holding a belief. I can see validity either way - they're an atheist because they're inherently capable of holding a belief in god and currently lack that belief, or that it's a category error because they're currently not capable of holding any belief in god.

[@Ichiro_Kinosita]

I want to sound more photosynthesis too(

[@johnmcnair8854]

Props man, i don't know how you do it. I'd be pushing the drop button so quickly.

[@FIoydFan]

15:36 Fraunhofer lines of distant light sources have red-shifted in frequency due to space itself expanding. We know the bands of the spectrum of light for elements producing light. This is how helium was first discovered. If we know space itself is expanding, and we were to turn back the arrow of time, all matter would rush to a singularity. A point where everything began. This is evidence, but not proof. I personally am attracted to the idea of Brahman dreaming our universe and everything in it. One day, Brahman will awaken, and reality will collapse to a point of singularity. At that time, Brahman will slumber again, re-creating reality. Nam Nam Christian tears because internet man invoked other world religions in a comprehensible manner.

[@FIoydFan]

You were flustered and I'm sure you would have nailed it if you weren't being hecklede. Btw, I stole the hinduism line from a Carl Sagan episode of Cosmos. Not sure if you would’ve got the reference…. I might be old.

[@SirSaltyHethan]

1:09:53 my favorite call of all time

[@tysongalloway5700]

How do they (adapt)? Adaptation!

[@richardlittrell3310]

Interesting how someone can read off a definition and not understand it. He might as well have read it off in a foreign language he did not speak. It’s a deep lesson. The theory of the expansion of the universe is not complete but so far as it has been worked out it has been confirmed by observation and experiments.

[@ryanknight199]

Oh my God if that guy wasn't such a jackass that was so funny. You wanna compare biceps brah?

[@markvonwisco7369]

Is "Viking" an insult now?!?? 😂

[@shockman8014]

"No I googled"

[@jasoncraig2281]

The “Go!” guy at 12:00 is one of the most annoying people I’ve ever heard in my life.

[@timothyt2981]

The one guys sounds like miles teller, if miles teller was a flat earther

[@-gearsgarage-]

32:39 the gun show

[@Soapy-chan]

jesus sacrificed himself for our sins, by being a faith healer and cult leader who got ratted out to the romans by judas and then getting crucified. Even if any of these events happened and the mythical figure existed, it wouldnt have been a sacrifice for anything. christian mythology makes NO SENSE.

[@Julian0101]

The sacrifice is made worse when you combine it with the chris tian excuse of "dying for chris tians is just moving to another place".

[@zacharyberridge7239]

I always liked the way Dillahunty said it. God had to sacrifice himself to himself to serve as a loophole for rules he created.

[@Soapy-chan]

@@zacharyberridge7239 yeah but even for that god would have made judas betray him

[@Diviance]

@@Julian0101 I am just curious what he sacrificed himself for... because God already did the global flood to remove sin from the world. So, what... did God _miss?_

[@Julian0101]

@@Diviance Well, jesus sacrificed a weekend in exchange for an eternity sitting in a throne.

[@andreasplosky8516]

This makes Americans look very bad. Are these voters? I am very worried about your future.

[@SNORKYMEDIA]

Only 46% of them have passports...85% in the UK for example. Most have not been anywhere else their whole lives

[@wiledman2430]

Same man same

[@glados7682]

GODDAMN mr planet peterson you're practically a male model with that beard I SWEAR TO FUCKING GOD (even if I don't believe in him lol) 42:35

[@nosredep7873]

😐

[@davidmarquart3912]

YOU VIKING!

[@Doggystyledaydream]

“Evidentiarily” isn’t a word, checkmate you’re entire argument is incorrect now

[@OGU44]

Very enjoyable science denial cringe compilation❤ and undefeated peterson served all of them

[@OGU44]

Well still have a half an hour left but I'm sure the rest will be as good

[@OGU44]

I was correct

[@Truthorbust]

14:45 PP says, "you asked for evidence, and I'm giving you evidence," then proceeds to ask a question. Repeats. I can't stand when people treat asking questions as if it's a form of evidence in debates. Normally I like PP but this is one thing I can't stand.

[@Petticca]

Dumbest arguments of the year *so far *No need for this defeatist, throw in the towel attitude. There could be more, there's still the last little bit of the year to go.

[@wiledman2430]

This has aged well

[@chudwick6516]

Wow, that second guy should just be a rapper instead. Take a breath, dude.

[@handl3869]

Maybe, but an inarticulate person sounds quite silly when they try to speak rapidly.😅