Dushyanth Sridhar on Ramayana and Mahabharatha connected | Ramayana Kalpavrksham 2024

At the Third day of Ramayana Kalpavruksham 2024, held at CCRT, Hyderabad, Dushyanth Sridhar in his discourse, talks about what beyond temple of Ayodhya and how we should adopt Ramayana to live our daily life. This Video is a part of his whole discourse where he shows how Ramayana and Mahabharatha are connected.

[@shivaramakrishnanpn5924]

Let the entire discourse be placed.

[@meghashyamk]

Sure, I am working on it.

[@bharathchandra1843]

Y no comments yet 😮🤦🏻

[@meghashyamk]

The Video has not yet reached many. :)

[@radhakrishnanv2286]

This speaker makes many lectures. What is that single message that comes out of these lectures ? Or.... Are these lectures meant simply for passing time ? I feel more "commitment and responsibility" is a must for the speaker in orienting the listeners towards their inner growth (instead of making general lectures for amusement and criticism)

[@meghashyamk]

Namasthe Radha Krishna garu, His lecture with amusement and criticism is to orient young listeners towards inner growth. In his lectures, he even quotes the soka and explains it. In this lecture, his message was what beyond Ram temple and what must we do to imbibe those qualities in our day to day life. I will upload full video soon with subtitles.

[@radhakrishnanv2286]

@@meghashyamk Namasthe ji Thank you for your kind response. You have mentioned "amusement and criticism" is added to attract the young listeners ! Which means there is false stuff that is deliberately being added into the lectures to attract the audience. Can a professor add false/irrelevant stuff and waste the valuable time while teaching calculus or any science subject ? Now the question is whether youngsters or old, the subject matter is the same. Especially youngsters can understand the subject and get the vision more easily than the old(who are biased by various religious stuff). Especially youngsters (or anyone) should be able to visualise the "false as false" & "true as true" in himself/herself, after listening to the speaker. I doubt no such effect can happen in such amusement & criticism based upanyasams ! Anyway the speaker has to speak on my comments !!

[@meghashyamk]

Sir, I understand your point. But if there's anything incorrect in his speech, we can comment on it, but the style of delivery is subjective. Some professors make the lecture joyful and interesting by bringing in humour and contemporary things. Some other don't do that still give an interesting lecture, and it doesn't mean they are less valued. I hope I made sense.

[@radhakrishnanv2286]

@@meghashyamk Thank you for your nice note . Yes , I comment on the content. As the content, any spiritual lecture should contain 1. the clear definition of fundamental human problem and make the audience understand that problem systamatically 2. make the audience to visualise the solution to the problem then & there (Not somewhere & sometime later or through some process or by becoming something etc) The speaker can take any model for delivering the above two. Here we see, amusement & criticism as complete content in the name of spirituality. We rarely find speakers with a clear about their own words and speak spirituality to address only the problem and solution of human beings (without adding any high-sounding/sugar-coating words). Ultimately, crypto-religions have grown /are growing in society with which the actual human problem is kept out-of-vision from human beings by pushing back the philosophy of any true religion. Thank you!