SLIP TEST - Honda CR-V AWD vs Toyota RAV4 AWD vs Subaru Forester S-AWD

No video

SLIP TEST - Honda CR-V AWD vs Toyota RAV4 AWD vs Subaru Forester S-AWD - @4x4.tests.on.rollers

Рет қаралды 40,874

4x4 / AWD slip tests on rollers channel

Күн бұрын

Stacja Kontroli Trakcji - join us on Facebook: / stacjakontrolitrakcji
Follow us on Instagram: / 4x4.tests.on.rollers
Honda CR-V 2.2 iCDTI MT Real Time AWD (2005)
vs
Toyota Rav4 2.0 D4D MT AWD (2005)
vs
Subaru Forester 2.5 XT AT S-AWD (2007)
#duszaniespokojna #hondacrv #subaruforester #toyotarav4

Пікірлер: 68

@user-hw8bo3so4g Жыл бұрын

Thank you! Been waiting for the CR-V gen 2 to appear on your channel. I'm really liking mine (2006/petrol/manual), a workhorse with lots of space. The AWD performance seems pretty typical for that era (based on what i've seen in your channel), not bad.

@leonsilcott4895 4 ай бұрын

1 2 3 and the winner is Subaru Forester

@Softroader Жыл бұрын

With the passage of time and the large number of videos shot, the results of this test are not really surprising. The CR-V shows the slight response times of the Dual-Pump system in returning torque to the rear. It also shows a certain limitation in the amount of torque it can send back, but if seems sufficient when the rear 2 wheels have grip. It also shows effective traction control, but this is totally dependent on ESP. As is often the case, this system is less effective at the rear. Combined with the limits of torque transfer, this is the limit. Finally, the Rav 4 has quite similar problems. Here, it's the viscous coupling that manages the locking rate of the central differential that is limiting. As a result, even on the front axle, traction control is not sufficient. In the case of the Forester, we can see quite clearly the difference in the way the multi-plate clutch operates between position D and 1. Traction control seems to be active earlier and more strongly in 1. Conversely, ESP seems rather intrusive.

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

Perfect comment.

@AlberHB.1 Жыл бұрын

El primer video con estos modelos en todo youtube 🤩

@LilDiabloRob Жыл бұрын

I’ve owned an 04 CRV AWD 5 speed manual and 07 Impreza NON-TURBO automatic wagon. CRV did better than my Impreza in the winter but BOTH NEEDED LIMITED SLIP DIFFERENTIALS for where I live. On the way to have a two installed in the CRV but sold it due to rust/rot. Impreza was traded in due to miles and headgasket.

@dundee1080 Жыл бұрын

Subaru and headgasket go hand in hand like bread and butter.

@Eugen-E Жыл бұрын

@@dundee1080There was only one engine model with head gasket issue - the 2.5 naturally aspirated. The 2.0 n/a and turbo and the 2.5 turbo didn't have it.

@krys8870 Жыл бұрын

W tej generacji ravki opcją był bodaj Torsen w tylnym moście. Piekne czasy, kiedy ksiegowi nie mieli jeszcze tyle głosu przy produkcji aut. Ogolnie jak na swoje lata wszystkie auta się spisały.

@chevyhighrider 6 ай бұрын

I ended up getting a ‘10 CRV even though I kinda wanted a Subaru. I didn’t want any potential head gasket issues, consumer reports rates the Subarus quite a lot worse in terms of long term reliability and the interior was uglier. Pretty happy so far with our “new” CRV. Had 101,000 on the clock and feels like new.

@dannybrezelhorner2715 Ай бұрын

I'm super happy with my 2004 CRV, Her traction control has kicked in only a few times for me but works really well, My dad forbid me to get a subaru because of their issues lol

@andreykakitis7025 Жыл бұрын

Люблю на старые машины посмотреть.В них душа есть.🎉

@angie_pinhead Жыл бұрын

@andreykakitis7025 Жыл бұрын

@@angie_pinhead Да

@trajanaugustus8783 3 ай бұрын

Subaru is King here, but I do like the older Rav4 as well.

@dannybrezelhorner2715 Ай бұрын

The CRV is still my favorite hands down, it may not outperform the Subaru, but I guarantee it will outlive it

@RayRay40613 Жыл бұрын

Symmetrical-AWD can do all levels

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

It depends which type of S-AWD.

@vasiliskatsiaounis 11 ай бұрын

of corse subaru with center diff lock at low range as expected, it rocks... but only for snow because of the small ground clearence... CRV, wich i own is so impresive!!! fistly because it fails only on the one test to the rear whell wich is ecpected because the torque that is tranferd is only 30%!!! and adittional the hydrolic system is the most reliable from every other system... the rav4 wich well kown as an off road car is 3rd and it strugles

@4x4.tests.on.rollers 11 ай бұрын

Subaru doesn't have low range. There's also no diff lock, there's a clutch pack which can temporarily lock the diff if computer decides to do it. It's also permanent awd system, so is the one in Toyota (mechanical center diff). CRV has on demand awd system and its biggest disadvantage is that it is only reactive system, there's no handling assist.

@vasiliskatsiaounis 11 ай бұрын

@@4x4.tests.on.rollers the manual i think it has low range

@4x4.tests.on.rollers 11 ай бұрын

@@vasiliskatsiaounis It does but this one was AT.

@vasiliskatsiaounis 11 ай бұрын

@@4x4.tests.on.rollers i am sorry but i don't drive automatics

@4x4.tests.on.rollers 11 ай бұрын

@@vasiliskatsiaounis That's your choice, no relation to the test. But be aware of the fact that sometimes automatics have better awd systems...

@adammacejko1194 4 ай бұрын

Honda surprised positively, Subaru negatively...It also should be compared automatic to automatic and manual to manual trans.

@4x4.tests.on.rollers 4 ай бұрын

Subaru is the only case where type of transmission influences the type of awd system.

@nagval7592 3 ай бұрын

Так Subaru единственная кто выехал с трёх роликов при загруженных передних! Так,что Subaru удивила положительно,а вот Honda отрицательно по факту!

@adammacejko1194 3 ай бұрын

@@nagval7592 if you know something about cars, you know that main benefit for Subaru is their 4wheel drive systems..Honda has other benefits - reliability, space, comfort,.. and their system is really simple and low maintenance - but as we could see, pretty well capable! So yes, Honda suprised positively, despite it is not in the same level of 4wd sofistication.

@mikmik9234 11 ай бұрын

Хм,не ожидал от Альфы, я удивлён 👍

@dachicicqishvili8493 Жыл бұрын

CR-V:)

@dimitu_ Жыл бұрын

Subaru is as expected, but seems that one really need to tell the system what to do with switching to 1 + Off, otherwise the electric brain is not smart enough.

@andinamm2246 11 ай бұрын

Wow! What happens on Subaru when first gear????

@4x4.tests.on.rollers 11 ай бұрын

It locks the center diff.

@841106noel Жыл бұрын

Mam taką crv. Na prawdę nieźle wypadła na rolkach. Niestety w terenie lekki wykrzyż i stoi. A w subaru kontrola trakcji działa lepiej jak się ją wyłączy 😜

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

Masz wersję z VSA? Co do Subaru, to kontrola trakcji zawsze jest aktywna, wyłącza się ESP 🙂

@841106noel Жыл бұрын

@@4x4.tests.on.rollers Tak, mam z VSA. Coś tam w terenie stara się robić, ale pod niewielką górkę jak stanę w wykrzyżu to nie może podjechać. Właśnie jak to sprawdzałem to zrobiłem zdjęcie i jest ono w miniaturce.

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

@@841106noel Nie da się zmusić układu do intensywnej pracy? Koła prosto i trzymać gaz równo przez jakiś czas, nie ujmować ani nie dodawać.

@841106noel Жыл бұрын

@@4x4.tests.on.rollers Próbowałem, ale na nic. Jak wciśnie się za dużo gazu to system dławi obroty. Elektroniczna przepustnica.

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

@@841106noel Zatem sprawdzi się na śliskich nawierzchniach, ale nie w terenie. Dopiero w czwartej generacji, i to po liftingu, rozgraniczono te funkcje i po wyłączeniu ESP można dawać więcej gazu, TC pozostaje zawsze aktywne.

@ihravagina 10 ай бұрын

Is there a lift kit on the CR-V? If yes, how thick spacers?

@4x4.tests.on.rollers 10 ай бұрын

There is but I have no detailed information.

@ihravagina 10 ай бұрын

Ok, thänx!

@simonpatrascu7462 Жыл бұрын

Subaru îs impressive

@thepelivideos2933 Жыл бұрын

vw golf country next

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

If we only find it...

@milanpesic9979 Жыл бұрын

Testiraj te i Reno senic Rx4 sa Tojotom Rav 4 2

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

If we only find it...

@MrBrzosti1989 Жыл бұрын

Forester winner. Ps. jakoś mnie to nie dziwi

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

Zgadza się, aczkolwiek mamy tu egzemplarz z topową wersją S-AWD, czyli VTD+VDC. Szeregowy manual wypadłby tu najgorzej z wszystkich.

@MrBrzosti1989 Жыл бұрын

@@4x4.tests.on.rollers Ja teraz mam już trzecie Subaru (outback 3.6) i szczerze nie chce innego auta z AWD

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

@@MrBrzosti1989 Rozumiem, ale jak wspomniałem, jedno S-AWD nie równe drugiemu, zupełnie inne konstrukcje, inne działanie.

@user-rb4ui3br4m 5 ай бұрын

Honda xrv dizayn 👍

@radisatosic709 3 ай бұрын

SUBARU FORESTER kao i uvek je TATA

@MemphisMojo15s Жыл бұрын

The ground on which we drive does not roll underneath the tire like a roller does so therefore you cannot absolutely get any traction whatsoever on a roller when it is not stationary but the ground itself is stationary and the right tire can help grip on ice or mud or something else

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

I don't get your point. Tire on the ground has grip and it should pull the car, that's the point of the test.

@poetsrear 10 ай бұрын

@@4x4.tests.on.rollersI think he means what I was thinking as well. This is laboratory test. Even the sloshiest mud gives more traction than the rollers with relatively zero resistance; you'll never end to this kind of situation in real use. I'm not saying that's implied, but it's just something I thought.

@4x4.tests.on.rollers 10 ай бұрын

@@poetsrear But that's not correct. Roller under load has quite a lot of resistance, probably more than black ice and definitely more than wheel in the air, which is normal situation.