We all watch this like we’re gonna buy a Jet one day 😂
@ques4estas2 жыл бұрын
One can dream 😂
@concretecat2 жыл бұрын
Hey u never know
@ramos82 жыл бұрын
Nah, it’s my insomnia, it’s either this or the guys who build mansions and pools out of mud
@osto10942 жыл бұрын
@@ramos8bro💀😭
@BiGi777 Жыл бұрын
Maybe!
@AngelDlamini-g3k2 ай бұрын
Very informative
@ralphcarbone2993 жыл бұрын
Nice video but there is not one PC24 flying single pilot due to insurance regs.
@stories-myhalfcenturyasapi39783 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Exactly the video that I was wanting. Choices include Phenom 100, Mustang and Eclipse, plus the Citation I SP, Eclipse 500-SE and Eclipse 550. The $4+ million jets and the Cirrus are not on the table.
@nik35522 жыл бұрын
Why no sf50?
@ArmAmericaFTG3 жыл бұрын
Love love love this Channel!
@dogguyful3 жыл бұрын
Beautiful jets
@chandrachurniyogi83943 жыл бұрын
planning to start air charter services with a fleet of three brand new Pilatus PC-24 ER light business jets followed by a fleet of brand new Bombardier Challenger 350 mid-sized business jet in the near future . . .
@letthetunesflow2 жыл бұрын
Wish you the best of luck! Sure is a difficult business, so I hope you have your wits about you. Crush it! Hope you are very successful, and get to follow your business aspirations all the way! BTW: Any update on how things are going? Would love to hear what’s happening, and what the companies name is/going to be, so I can check your company out!
@mianzahidmahmood3 жыл бұрын
Great Stuff
@neilhaas60243 жыл бұрын
Love the channel and private jets. Nice video of these airplanes. 👏👍🤗😁😀💔💘🛩️🛩️🛩️🛩️
@vedbarua24683 жыл бұрын
Excellent. Planning to buy pre-owned. Needs guidance
@Puzzoozoo2 жыл бұрын
Check out the company that makes the aircraft, to see if they are doing well or are in financial trouble.
@clarencehopkins78322 жыл бұрын
Excellent stuff bro
@nkt0811 Жыл бұрын
Honda Jet Elite II will be my dream private jet ever…
@bryonraper35062 жыл бұрын
Loves me some M2 GEN2. I’m 6’6” and the flight deck is as comfortable if not more than an MD-11. The designers did a fantastic job with that whole airplane.
@farrukhahmad5552 жыл бұрын
Hi will you Hire Me I Do Asset Manager, Accounts And Tax Manager , Insurance And Transaction Purpose I Do Work with safe and Honestly
👌Great quality Pilatus PC 24 made in 🇨🇭 with lots of option to use at different runways and with perfect longterm investment🙏😎
@harrynelson92032 жыл бұрын
My dream jet, dirt landings and short take offs 🤤🤤😍👌🏻
@mrabrasive513 жыл бұрын
Premier 1A..hello!!
@neilhaas60243 жыл бұрын
I like the Honda jet Honda aircraft nice plane.
@pycontiki3 жыл бұрын
Not enough range
@parimal75283 жыл бұрын
@@pycontiki Check Honda 2600
@nik35522 жыл бұрын
@@parimal7528 still a concept only...
@kennethonyenah11032 жыл бұрын
You forgot to mention the jets that have bathrooms.
@OMG_No_Way2 жыл бұрын
@@kennethonyenah1103 The Honda Jet has a bathroom.
@rrocketman3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, might consider acquisition👍
@LMays-cu2hp3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much..
@farrukhahmad5552 жыл бұрын
Hi will you Hire Me I Do Asset Manager, Accounts And Tax Manager , Insurance And Transaction Purpose I Do Work with safe and Honestly
@mitchellisaac74903 жыл бұрын
I never thought I would see efficient and private jet in the same sentence .
@NicksStuff3 жыл бұрын
Note than none of these is an efficient aircraft, they're efficient *jets*
@farrukhahmad5552 жыл бұрын
Hi will you Hire Me I Do Asset Manager, Accounts And Tax Manager , Insurance And Transaction Purpose I Do Work with safe and Honest
@pmb00013 жыл бұрын
And a ‘wiser man said; “If it flies, floats or fu*ks - rent it”
@2011blueman3 жыл бұрын
You're quoting a drug addict character of a tv show that had head injuries.
@marcelobitaraes23723 жыл бұрын
“If it flies, floats or fu*ks, always rent, never buy”
@thecman262 жыл бұрын
Why is the Lockheed C130 not on this list? It would make a great family hauler! Oh, duh! Turboprop...
@pbasswil Жыл бұрын
There's a twin turboprop that's a worthy competitor for some of these, the Piaggio Avanti P180. Super aerodynamic, it's as fast as the average biz jet, but much more economical to fly. And it looks cool as hell.
@ericsordillon27163 жыл бұрын
Another good vidéo of you ! You scribe the technical description it's well ! For the people like me who their english in not good ! Bravo continue ! Kiss from France ! 😍❤️✌️
@geobely3 жыл бұрын
Good selection but why the piper jet was not on the list
@stories-myhalfcenturyasapi39783 жыл бұрын
There was a total of 1 (one) ever built. Haven't heard anything about it since the Aliaire was cancelled.
@farrukhahmad5552 жыл бұрын
Hi will you Hire Me I Do Asset Manager, Accounts And Tax Manager , Insurance And Transaction Purpose I Do Work with safe and Honestly
@josemariamorentinpascual51613 жыл бұрын
Quisiera conocer los datos técnicos de estos jets y los precios
@TheMormonPower2 жыл бұрын
I like the Honda Jet, because it's the smallest jet to have a bathroom 😱
@walterweigert98403 жыл бұрын
A question: when you say "miles per hour", do you meen terrestrial miles or nautical miles. In the aeronatical community "knots" is the right term for velocity and Nautical Miles is the appropiate term for range. "Miles per hour " is a bit confusing. Thanks for the info. Cheers from NE patagonia, Argentina.
@matthelord76953 жыл бұрын
Dude
@matthelord76953 жыл бұрын
How are normal miles more confusing than knots or nautical miles
@walterweigert98403 жыл бұрын
@@matthelord7695 Both, Terrestrial and nautical are called miles. The diference in between are: TM (Terrestrial Mile) messures 1609 meters (or 1,609 Kilometers), and NM (Nautical Mile) messures 1852 meters (or 1,852 Kilometers). The ratio in between both is 1,15078, witch meens 1 NM is equal to 1,15 TM. In other words, 1 NM is 15% longer than 1TM; therefor the velocity mentioned in the video is confusing. Most of the terminology used in aeronautical lengage comes from the nautical environment, and in nautical terms, speed is always mentioned in "Knots", witch are Nautical Miles per hour. It was absolutely not my intention to disrespect anybody with my comment. I hope this answer clears a bit your concerns. I wish you well. Cheers from NE patagonia, Argentina. BTW, I´m a former pilot.
@matthelord76953 жыл бұрын
@@walterweigert9840 i dont think you exactly understand what i was talking about
@matthelord76953 жыл бұрын
@@walterweigert9840 its easier for me to understand how far or fast we are in miles than nautical miles because we use miles all the time and not nautical miles
@JJ7Redick2 жыл бұрын
A couple things: Does your cost figure not include the price of financing the jet? I don't feel like going to check your math and figure it out myself at the moment. The Honda jet was designed by American engineers working for an American aviation branch of the Honda company. But call it japanese engineering if you'd like.
@josemariamorentinpascual51613 жыл бұрын
Hay posibilidad de oír este video en castellano?
@Dwaynesaviation3 жыл бұрын
No lo sé, pero puedo enviarte el guión para que lo traduzcas y lo leas.
@amigochevere52173 жыл бұрын
If a win the lottery I promise to buy one of these
@Puzzoozoo2 жыл бұрын
The moral is if your company is needing a small corporate jet(s) before it needs needing a bigger jet(s) best to checkout the company that makes it, otherwise the company will go bust and will be gone, and you'll be screwed for maintenance and spares. Cessna's offerings might be more expensive, but you'll know that Cesena isn't going anywhere soon.
@JG-me5bd Жыл бұрын
As an A&P Mechanic for over 33years Parts for replacement AND Maintenance... It Depends on your pocket book..
@flameout123452 жыл бұрын
Can you fly these from Singapore to LAX?
@PennyLiz999 Жыл бұрын
I highly doubt it.
@noisnaosabe3 жыл бұрын
EMBRAER 🇧🇷🇧🇷💪💪
@pycontiki3 жыл бұрын
Designed in Brazil 🇧🇷 Made in Florida 🇺🇸
@marcelobitaraes23723 жыл бұрын
@@pycontiki yep
@fmac644114 күн бұрын
2:40 vs 4:40, is better use always the same exemples. How compare distances of diferent places? Both your american audience and any african Will have only gets half of the information. Ok that you said the number, but the reference is lost
@anthonyhunt701 Жыл бұрын
Do these all have lavatories?
@antonmursid35052 жыл бұрын
Antonmursid 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏💝🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨💝👌✌🙏
@dunaigeorge7264 Жыл бұрын
Fun I never flight in my life because I scared of flying but I promise to my self if one day I can buy my own plane I will try the flying! I hope and wish who see this comment one day able to buy a jet!🙏
@DinhDapDa2 жыл бұрын
Ich mag Power & Speed too!!!!!!!!!!
@DanFrederiksen11 ай бұрын
The Eclipse actually had great potential and I think it was pratt and whitney's greedy pricing that killed them. 2023 price per engine was 911k$. Not easy to make money on a half million dollar jet when pratt and whitney wants 2million dollars in protection money. What Eclipse should do is make their own engine. Because the Eclipse is so great that it has better fuel economy than a Baron 58 piston twin while going 60% faster in jet silence. A small jet engine like the one they use is simply not that hard to make, it's machining of completely conventional steel and inconel. No exotic bearings or metal. As I see it it's simpler than a piston engine to make yet they are priced VERY differently. VW said a few years ago that their typical 4 cylinder turbo diesel engine cost them 2k€ each and that's not a simple engine. Yet that's 0.25% of the price pratt wants for one engine. The high pressure turbine in the PW610f is so small you can palm it in your hand. And that has to cost 1million dollars... I really don't think so. It's so despicable because it's really arresting GA. If they had a more reasonable price, say 50k then people would build all kinds of amazing aircraft around it. It's actually what the 100million dollar nasa project in 2000 tried to do. Williams got 39million dollars to develop a small engine and delivered nothing. They could just have scaled down their existing engines but no... nothing. The truly mindblowing thing is that turbofan jets can have as good or better fuel economy than piston props. And I know which one is cooler and more capable. And because jet engines are light for their power you can make truly ridiculous aircraft with more thrust to weight ratio than fighter jets. Able to climb straight up. So much untapped potential in GA. We could have had personal jets with good efficiency in the 1960s. Yet it wasn't done.
@ichbinlieb71253 жыл бұрын
Where's the list of the comparisons of these 10 Jets?
@farrukhahmad5552 жыл бұрын
Hi will you Hire Me I Do Asset Manager, Accounts And Tax Manager , Insurance And Transaction Purpose I Do Work with safe and Honestly
@herranton2 жыл бұрын
The lav on the pc24 is ridiculous. No millionaire is going to want to use that. Who thought transforming the gally into a lav was a good idea?
@josephhann88443 жыл бұрын
The words jet and economical don't belong in the same sentence no matter what the brand or level.
@Puzzoozoo2 жыл бұрын
They are 'economical' in time saved for business meetings. 😉
@JERios-wv8lx3 жыл бұрын
No surprise there's no "Gulf Stream" or "Bombardier" planes in this vlist! (However, i thought maybe the Bombardier's "Lear Jet 75" could be included.)
@sajp88593 жыл бұрын
Lemme mount machine guns with
@sajp88593 жыл бұрын
0
@dmack18273 жыл бұрын
I think they selected single pilot aircraft so an under-experienced exec could write himself off. Look at all the money you save! The Lear 75 isa two crew FAR 25 aircraft.
@DinhDapDa2 жыл бұрын
Beim 3 Klasse war ich schon Sprachlos bis heute 😀😁😂🤣😃
@markbuckingham3631 Жыл бұрын
All the range capabilities are always eastbound….I’ve had up to 130 kt tailwinds. Give the range westbound.
@xyzaero3 жыл бұрын
HIRING THAT SECOND PILOT HUGELY INCREASES YOUR OPERATIONAL SAFETY !! If you have to save money by hiring just one pilot, you should not get into the business jet game, because you definitely don't have the money to do so !! furthermore crew salaries are just a fraction of your jet operating costs. your biggest cost is asset depreciation and fuel. Stay out of aviation, if you can't afford proper and safe multi crew operations.
@andrewjeon24113 жыл бұрын
Very true, and you gotta give us jobs
@pycontiki3 жыл бұрын
Totally agree. But some people will argue about an extra $150/hr for an extra pilot on a $3-4000/hr aircraft charter. 🤦🏻♂️
@xyzaero3 жыл бұрын
@@pycontiki it gets even worse than saving 150$ on a charter trip. Many Part 95 operators don’t even calculate for performance degradations if they loose an engine during takeoff. They operate a Gulfstream or Challenger and waste all the safety provided by these machines, just to be able to drag one or 2 more passengers out of a short or hot/high airport.
@xyzaero3 жыл бұрын
@@andrewjeon2411 there are countless jobs out there. It just depends on your qualifications and willingness to work.
@dellclouds30903 жыл бұрын
0:44 Damn, good luck to whoever turned down his deal.
@tonylam9548 Жыл бұрын
I think you are totally wrong, the most efficient jet is a turbo prop, like king Air, P180 or PC12. The public been conditioned in the last 3/4 century that jet is good and propellers obsolete, so they have to hide the propeller with a shroud and rename the propeller a fan. All high by-pass turbines are basically glorified turbo props but the public are too ignorant to know that. Jets have also been stuck at the "sound barrier" for 3/4 century. The fastest one is just a few knots faster than the next one. Biz jets are also only suitable for those short business trips and predictable schedules.Airlines with the big jets still have the edge in range. I will not get into any single pilot airplanes unless I get the co-pilot seat, or unless hostile natives are after me , like Indiana Jones. I rather fly with a pilot that is a bit drunk than one that had the vax. The drunk will sober up, the vax one can just keel over and someone else will have to land the plane.
@peterkelly96142 жыл бұрын
All the pictures of cockpit show two pilots
@hustlinsteaks53203 жыл бұрын
🥂✈🇺🇸🙏😇
@ampmskm2 жыл бұрын
Hondajet has no match for small private jets
@gailmrutland65083 жыл бұрын
*Ummm you are allover the place with this vid. Organize it by some CONSISTENT metric, and speaking of metrics PICK ONE don't quote on plane in NM and the next in miles. A little re-work and it could be VERY GOOD!*
@thecman262 жыл бұрын
No, Kay tee a ess
@mr.commander39472 жыл бұрын
yes, I like to buy the cirrus, but with a long waiting period, 2 years long waiting. what a giraffe long neck.
@douglasgeorge61863 жыл бұрын
Syberjet has the range and altitude
@daveriley63102 жыл бұрын
And similar to the Piper jet, the Syberjet is too rare to even have a place in this video.
@TB127102 жыл бұрын
@@daveriley6310 are you good at math ? After a mission from St. John’s Canada to Manchester UK how many more miles can an SJ30i travel ? 😊
@daveriley63102 жыл бұрын
@@TB12710 Yeah. No wind, light load, 583 NM beyond Manchester until fuel exhaustion.
@kellyfennell45593 жыл бұрын
Always amazes me someone that can afford a single turbine buys it instead of a twin turbine to save fuel what is your ass worth a little fuel ,in ag flying turbine engines quit all the time
@daveriley63102 жыл бұрын
You are correct, Kelly. The writer of this video narration is saying that by adding a parachute it becomes the safest jet. I consider that to be ignorant BS. I have flown single engine jets and multiengine jets. I loved flying the singles, both of which were top of the line fighters when they were built. But I had ejection seats and the military was basically assuming the "insurance cost." The Cirrus Vision Jet is not on my shopping list. Just wish the Eclipse had room for luggage and/or golf bags.
@farrukhahmad5552 жыл бұрын
Hi will you Hire Me I Do Asset Manager, Accounts And Tax Manager , Insurance And Transaction Purpose I Do Work with safe and Honestly
@dezurnilogicar69693 жыл бұрын
Piaggio Avanti II is the best
@bravocharlie6392 жыл бұрын
The Most Economical Jet is a Turboprop.
@brycecampbell48452 жыл бұрын
Flying has gotten too expensive. I'd rather hire a driver and get A Maybach or Rolls Royce
@sami-khondakar2 жыл бұрын
Should've included these: 1. Bombardier Global Express 2. Falcon 900 3. Falcon 50
@richardrubert9698Ай бұрын
Your list are all small jets. None practical for real corporate travel.
@ceciliaieav3 жыл бұрын
The Honda looks like the head of the Kamen Rider Black... very ugly! Cesnas are very beautiful inside and ugly outside, reminiscent of cars from the 80s... No wonder the Embraer Phenom-300 is the best-selling private jet for the last 10 years in a row... Like the Phenom-100, they are the best in their equivalents, not just because they fly faster, higher and farther, costing less and maintaining the VIP +AAA standard of the product... but their great differential idea, I believe is Embraer's proprietary Fly By Wire system, and not a generic off-the-shelf system, as most of them don't even have a FBW system.
@ampmskm2 жыл бұрын
You need a big update!! You still in the 2010's.😂😂 Honda jet has no match technically, or value for money and it's the highest seller already and rising..
@ceciliaieav2 жыл бұрын
@@ampmskm I'll pretend the Phenom 100 and Phenom 300 aren't the best-selling jets for the last 10 years straight...
@Batman-wv5ng2 жыл бұрын
I think the Honda is the ugliest on this list , especially with those breast sticking up on the wings .
@sherylwright22332 жыл бұрын
Businessmen??? As a business woman, who owned and operated my own jet, I take offence to your archaic language.