E400 Blood Glucose Smart Watch - Glucometer Test at. 6:30 PM /18:30 (Conclusions in the description)

[@-Munditimum-]

I tried this watch for a few weeks. I tested my glucose levels about 8 -16 times a day. I also purposefully got my levels very high and same with lowering it to very low levels. Over 90% of the results were completely off. I also know this since I have used other glucometers to put this watch against. Otherwise it's actually a descant watch with its other useful features, but if you're getting it for your blood sugar levels know that at least for me, they were totally off. Cheers! M

[@GeekyPalette]

Buen video, del reloj más vale no fiarse mucho😄

[@Gadgetsnewsandtests]

No es un dispositivo médico, pero sería bueno si la medida fuera cercana.

[@katonhonarede1853]

Sem condições. Diferença absurda kkkkk

[@krollpeter]

The blood sugar data it displays are not measured, they are pre-programmed. It always shows data that are fairly ok, except around 10 am, 3 pm and 7 pm. Then it displays slightly higher values (after mealtimes). The step counter is inaccurate, the pulse rate is being measured and displayed even if I put it on a flat table surface, etc etc., nothing with this watch works correct except the time display. I gave mine to a kid as a toy.

[@Gadgetsnewsandtests]

Maybe you're right. I have yet to test it. Before the 4:30 PM meal I had 84 mg/dL, after the 6:30 PM meal I had 105 mg/dL, and now at 8:30 PM I have 119 mg/dL. Certainly, there are some algorithms and if they develop, it will be a success and high accuracy. As for the pulse. It works like a hospital finger pulse oximeter. The fact that it measures the pulse of the table is because there is no proximity sensor for the hand. There are smartwatches that know that they are not on hand and inform about it. As for the measurement of steps, of course, they are more or less accurate. Because they count steps from the shock, the movement of the hand. Some manufacturers require you to specify the hand the smartwatch is on to make the measurement more accurate.

[@rolandholtz8250]

The difference in value renders this device completely unusefull. Thanks for showing the results. I was about to purchase one.

[@Gadgetsnewsandtests]

It seems to work better here kzbin.info/www/bejne/qJucn6uihN6rgtk

[@grzegorzmika5204]

Czyli te pomiary są g... Warte....

[@Gadgetsnewsandtests]

Tylko z cukrem jest problem. Ale zobacz mój film z cukierkami i E500. Po zjedzeniu słodkiego poziom się podnosił. Robiłem to kilka razy.

[@grzegorzmika5204]

@@Gadgetsnewsandtests ale co z tego skoro glukometr wskazuję 150 a zegarek niespełna 100. Mogę zaakceptować błąd rzędu 15 mg/dl ale nie taki bo tego rodzaju wyniki to ledwo zauważalna korelacja ze stanem prawdziwym....

[@Gadgetsnewsandtests]

To prawda, ale liczyłem że błąd będzie powtarzalny. Tak mi mówił przyjaciel, że ma błąd powtarzalny. Ale zobacz mój film i u mnie nie był powtarzalny - kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z4S9i4OqhdWXepo

[@ashalatha5048]

Nearly 57 points is difference in watch

[@1234epps]

This watch isn’t even close my sugar was 400 it said 117 DO NOT BUY

[@sunnybunny3317]

Light sensor cannot taste sugar in skin😅