Vladimir didnt pick Orthodoxy because "churches were lavish", he did so because he first considered Catholicism and concluded that Pope meddled too much in the state business, whereas the Orthodox clergy was perfectly happy to mind their own business as long as they had their privileges.
@tonuka62574 жыл бұрын
Still makes for a funny story
@joeblack53932 жыл бұрын
@@thehammerite9437 Sure there was, just wasnt official yet. But Byzantine and Roman rites were absolutely rivals and competing to convert still pagan realms.
@ze_baronkrigler76112 жыл бұрын
Thank you, That triggered me as an Orthodox and Rus' History Enjoyer (idk what to say but you understand what I mean)
@taherbertolinirodrigues91042 жыл бұрын
Also, in orthodoxy, the religious head of a country is picked by that country’s ruler, which is another power grab from the main head of power
@georgekashuba16562 жыл бұрын
Volodymyr is correct spelling.
@UsefulCharts5 жыл бұрын
Very nice. I was doing some research into the early Rurik Dynasty awhile back in preparation for the big Eastern European Royal family tree I'm doing later this year and this helps put things in perspective. Your channel is great because most history channels focus primarily on Western Europe.
@UsefulCharts5 жыл бұрын
@@MLaserHistory My usual way of handling such things is to go with the best guess and then throw in a question mark 😀
@rudolfkraffzick6425 жыл бұрын
No, not so nice. A LOT OF MAPS ARE INACCURATE. Balts settled around 1000 far more to the east and Finno- Ugrians to the south. Please, no eastern slavs nationalism.
@garrettallen74275 жыл бұрын
Interviewer: so tell me Vladimir of Novgorod, why did you convert to Orthodox Christianity? Vladimir: Well I don’t like being not drunk so that left Islam out of the question. I was thinking about Judaism but the fact that its followers couldn’t hold Jerusalem reminded me too much of Sviatoslavs’ recent holdings being taken from him. Then I thought, why not Christianity? But then I needed to decide which one. I took one look at an Orthodox Church and was instantly captivated! I took another look at a Catholic Church and knew which religion I wanted to practice. Interviewer: .............ok
@kolemjdouciturista14465 жыл бұрын
I still cant belive that something so important was decide by one man and his feeling... Trust me my subjects I know what is good for you.
@romanpopyk5 жыл бұрын
I think he decided to take Christianity because Byzantium was their main trade partner and a lot of Slavs(Bolgars and Serbs) already had been converted to it
@krisskross30765 жыл бұрын
@n. фффвär eat drink man woman foreskin ...all those matters, if you design a Religion you better keep that in mind
@dmitriygryaznov92105 жыл бұрын
@@argumentativelysound2001 As far as I read (from Russian sources, so chance of bias) first he decided to take Eastern Christianity, then he thought being asked to be converted is better from a political standpoint, and so decided to go through with the marriage. And I prefer readings where Eastern Christianity was the cause of the marriage due to the former having quite a lot of other reasons (strong trade connections to Byzantine Empire, Eastern Clergy being subject to local authorities unlike their Western counterpart, etc.)
@dmitriygryaznov92105 жыл бұрын
@@argumentativelysound2001 My comment may be slightly off-mark because I am not %100 sure I understood yours. I find your reading of the situation unconvincing; Helga was a Christian but failed to convert even her son Svyatoslav (Vladimir's father), who cited being afraid of losing respect with his troops and ended up fighting a war with the Byzantines. In this context, Vladimir sending delegations to other countries looks like making sure that a possible choice of religion would be supported by his nobles, whose help he'd later use in Christianization of the rest of the country (while Helga had previously been content with being Christian ruler of a Pagan country). The marriage looks like part of a wider trend and giving it precedence is weird. I am not even mentioning that Povest' asserts 987 as the year of the boyar council where Vladimir decided to accept Christianity (because Povest' is not %100 reliable).
@reds.victim10234 жыл бұрын
"Drinking is the joy of all the Rus'." Classic.
@ВасильМолодой4 жыл бұрын
It's was saying in 16 cetery. In Kievan Rus people not drink so much
@wielkapol94692 жыл бұрын
vodka comes from poland
@ze_baronkrigler76112 жыл бұрын
Yes, Thats one of the reasons they didn't want to be islamic
@wielkapol94692 жыл бұрын
@@ze_baronkrigler7611 christians arnt meant to drink either
@ze_baronkrigler76112 жыл бұрын
@@wielkapol9469 Thats straight up wrong
@silentone111111113 жыл бұрын
We need more stuff on central and Eastern Europe. It’s stuff we don’t get in school. Generally if it’s not about England or classical stuff it’s like it never happened. So good work 😀
@gots0359 Жыл бұрын
bro you must be american or something. Even I from Asia have learned general history of central/eastern/also US itself just because our education minister thinks it's vital and I agree. Like wtf are you even from
@silentone11111111 Жыл бұрын
@@gots0359 UK. So they teach you history, but not how to not be rude. Bro. Maybe work on that English grammar of yours. It needs some work.
@gots0359 Жыл бұрын
@@silentone11111111 my bad for not knowing my third language on a perfect level grammar bro. Plus i wasnt rude i was just amazed by how your minstery of education treats you. Like how come you don't even learn anything outside of england lol
@jacondo27315 жыл бұрын
this is the easiest and simplest explanation thanks man.
@jacondo27315 жыл бұрын
@@MLaserHistory you responded thanks mate
@eypandabear74832 жыл бұрын
The way the Slavs adopted the Rus’ name is interesting. It’s similar to the Romano-Celtic people of Gaul becoming the “French”, isn’t it?
@MLaserHistory2 жыл бұрын
I mean it is interesting but not unusual. Name is just a meaningless word unless someone gives it meaning. That meaning can be altered and changed and as such names can be abandoned or adopted very easily. That is why many societies have names that they identify with very strongly that, in etymological terms, don't come from their current language family.
@rty37512 жыл бұрын
It's the same as the Ukrainia got their name from the Russians Okraina - an outskirts.
@olgert35512 жыл бұрын
@@rty3751 No, it's more like Vkraina - which means country in our language. So our country name is like supreme version of word - homeland
@amalekh Жыл бұрын
@@olgert3551 cope
@nesirosern8596 Жыл бұрын
@@olgert3551 Yeah, right 😂😂😂😂
@TheSto4004 жыл бұрын
Your videos on early slavic history are amongst my favourite on youtube. Three suggestions for future videos: 1) Medieval Bulgaria 2) Medieval Serbia 3) Ottoman conquest of the Balkans
@Dexusaz4 жыл бұрын
Slavic history is very underrated, great video!
@aryanpugilist4 жыл бұрын
Bell Witch!!!
@csbanki3 жыл бұрын
I love how every ruler becomes a saint after their conversion to christianity :D Again great video, I don't think I've ever learned about a huge slavic empire in the east, that's pretty interesting!
@anderslniemi5 жыл бұрын
This is a great addition to one of my favorite series ever! Thank you!
@anonymousbloke1 Жыл бұрын
Rurik's first town was indeed Staraya Ladoga later pictured in your map, not Novgorod. Novgorod was founded a century/century and a half later, more or less
@klearkhoswashokani17975 жыл бұрын
those videos are seriously underrated with such an effort in them
@polina55204 жыл бұрын
13:19 I think the main reasons were that he didn’t want to submit to the power of the Pope + orthodox Christianity claimed that the power of a ruler was holy
@bossschmutzfink98653 жыл бұрын
The main reason was becoming closer friends with the byzantinian empire
@tereziamarkova2822 Жыл бұрын
As far as I know, the whole "Vladimir rejected islam because of the ban on drinking" is mostly a legend, Vladimir's main motivation appears to be the growing closeness of the Kievan Rus' to Byzantine Empire, which was their most important trade partner and biggest, most developed regional power. Building ties with them really made the most sense.
@Name-t9fbd Жыл бұрын
Saint Vladzimir was also a rapist. One of his victims was Belarusian princess Rahnieda of Połack.
@tereziamarkova2822 Жыл бұрын
@@Name-t9fbd Trying to be shocked over here that a 10th century warlord would kill a man for slighting him and forcibly marry his daughter, but somehow I can't muster the outrage. I mean, it's a horrible story, but not something I wouldn't expect from one of the descendants of the goddamn Olga of Kiev. (For the record, I am not really Christian, so the title of "saint" doesn't hold much moral weight for me, unless it's really given for being exceptionally charitable, as opposed to, say, being the ruler that forced their people to get baptized.)
@anarchistalhazen70845 жыл бұрын
@M.Laser The knowledge of making Damascus Steel did not come from India, but the Abbasid Caliphate. Syria was as a centre of sword manufacturing even in the Roman era, But the metal that was used was from India.
@AsatorIV5 жыл бұрын
@q1k9i3l0ä5å Yes, but only partially. The most important part of forging steel are the chemical reactions that turn iron into steel afterwards. In other words, it was more about the process of making the steel, rather than about the ore.
@MLaserHistory5 жыл бұрын
I made a mistake there, the correction is in the description. "I actually meant to say crucible steel not Damascus steel as the ulfberht swords never actually where true Damascus steel. They where sometimes considered as pattern welded "false Damascus" steel which is a form of crucible steel but isn't actually true Damascus steel." And crucible steel and it's production comes from southern India and Sri Lanka, from there it traveled across the middle eastern trade routs and eventually up the Eastern European waterways all the way to Scandinavia.
@HistoryHustle5 жыл бұрын
Very interesting video. Haven't studies much about early slavic history!
@keeganmoonshine71834 жыл бұрын
I am shocked this is the first time I'm seeing your videos. You're really good. subscribed
@andreman27672 жыл бұрын
Eastern slav' history amateur here. My imho notes: 1) Expansion to east was actually much slower and at described times area was (presumably) significantly smaller in east and north parts (then in 2:00). Finno-ugric population by time was assimilated by slavic communities, so yes, it looked like in top north at 2:00, but at the position of letter c in words Finno-ugric should be much less slavs and more finno-ugric peoples (and slavs near Volga in 9 century?). Also, dencity should be showed to be much sparce then shown 2) Presumably baltic peoples also had more land then shown on 2:00 3) Here at 2:20 map looks more accurate in terms of slav spread in pre-11cen. (If without 2 eastern tribes - i would say it will be pretty close in 8-9 c.). However due to common tribe distribution maps, even through neighbourhood is right, tribes commoly drawed in different places (mostly bit to east), for example main Severian city - Chernihiv - located here between Drevlans and Polans, i.e. Severians waaay eastward then they should be Upd: Also see video's description, here some words about that i said here, so it may be considered that it was 'fixed' :D Actually very liked this slavic series, especially part about western slavs, good job!
@NihilsineDeo1866.5 жыл бұрын
Hi im new here and you channel is nice.
@historyrhymes17015 жыл бұрын
Awesome video. You covered a lot of controversial topics , probably in the best possible way . One small correction though, the first law reforms in Eastern Europe were done by Krum of Bulgaria (or possibly by his son Omurtag) Although ofcource if you exclude the Bulgarian possessions north of the Danube at the time , Bulgaria could have been considered as part of Southern Europe.
@historyrhymes17015 жыл бұрын
@@gagaspraga8194 Han what is that ? the title is Kanasubigi. And what we see from their inscriptions the Bulgarians never ever put their names infront of their titles like the turks and mongols. And as of the tatars they firstly arrived in Europe in the 13th century and the first sources about Bulgarians living in Europe (The Caucasus) date back to the 3rd century
@hexapodc.19735 жыл бұрын
Very nice, you really need more subs man. Your videos are amazing.
@MikeHaggarKJ2 жыл бұрын
Your videos are extremely good and I love watching them.
@BraveGisgo5 ай бұрын
This channel is a treasure trove of often neglected central and eastern european history. 💯💯💯💯💣💣💥
@cathyg88253 жыл бұрын
This is the best video you ever made !
@stefangamble26375 жыл бұрын
Are you planning on following up these videos with middle Slavic and late Slavic history
@MLaserHistory5 жыл бұрын
Maybe in the future yes, but for now there's just not enough time since I can't do youtube full time.
@rigbytheanimal38685 жыл бұрын
wait wat why so small amount of viewers this is so underrated
@Sparticulous5 жыл бұрын
RigbY TheAnimal he is a new speaker. I’m sure his popularity will grow with this quality
@HistoryandOtherStuffwithBV5 жыл бұрын
brain4breakfast and M. Laser upload a video on the same day? Is this heaven?
@alexeychalov1633 жыл бұрын
North-east sloveny from Ladoga and Novgorod were north-west slavs, colonising the trade from Baltic Sea to the south by settling on the north part of Volga river enter. As well as south East Slavs as Radimichi and Vyatichi did the same thing on Oka river (middle part to enter Volga). There were no much differences in slavs tribes and there languages or whatever, but they practiced different types of social hierarchy (Dnipro was more patriarchal clans, east was more independent communities).
@Luna_the-Idiot9 ай бұрын
" *WELL YOU SEE IT ALL STARTED IN 882, WHEN RURIK-* "
@noco72432 жыл бұрын
My girlfriend is Belarusian. Now I know why she lives in a hut and hibernates during the winter. Thank you.
@παυροεπής2 жыл бұрын
Does she really?:)
@noco7243 Жыл бұрын
@@παυροεπής Why of course.
@justrandomguy5010 Жыл бұрын
based berry collector gf
@00MSG5 жыл бұрын
Put off by Islam because "Drinking is the joy of all Rus. We cannot exist without that pleasure." What a wise man.
@aryanyadav6332 жыл бұрын
You make very impressive videos. Keep it up!
@AnthonyConstable4 жыл бұрын
Excellent video! Thank you!
@ninostrcic67095 жыл бұрын
Will you cover rest of slavic history or is this it
@ninostrcic67095 жыл бұрын
@@MLaserHistory good to know
@oli315 жыл бұрын
Please do history of Finland, thanks! Awesome channel!!
@Aurinkohirvi5 жыл бұрын
Please don't! There's already heaps of uneducated storytellers doing the same thing!
@Omnigreen4 жыл бұрын
I hope there will be continuation, you left at the most interesting part.
@UpcycleElectronics5 жыл бұрын
Well done
@petemcfadyen16974 жыл бұрын
Could you put time stamps within the video? It would make it a lot easier to follow in an historical perspective. Thanks.
@PaveLiki Жыл бұрын
Awesome video, thanks for your work.
@NikiTheWreck Жыл бұрын
Hi, thanks for a very clear explanation. Can you cite your sources for this video? I don't mean primary sources necessarily
@williamkartatar47595 жыл бұрын
Good job!
@dmitriygryaznov92105 жыл бұрын
Can't help noticing how in the end you must be referring to comments of these emissaries about them feeling "like in heaven" in Hagia Sophia, but their words are often interpreted (at least in Russian historical tradition) as not about lavishness of the temple but rather about a special religious ceremony Byzantines put up to impress them. But, I still really liked the vid and found it well-researched. Also, a fun bit of speculation: the time Vladimir was making the faith choices were just a couple of decades after the "special" Pope John XII and the broader "saeculum obscurum," and a couple of Russian historians speculate rumors of these happenings did not really strengthen Western Church's appeal in the eyes of Rus' (not saying "weakened it" because accepting Christianity from Rome rather than Constantinople was already unlikely due to much stronger trade and cultural ties with the latter).
@emil36574 жыл бұрын
really nice, and you don't sound so monotone in this one
@georgetacaprarescu87169 ай бұрын
Dear Sir thank you for the video. I want to ask you the next question. Did the Slavic people merge or did they absorb the Scythians and Sarmats? And please indicate the sources for the answer. Thank you!
@Domciskas3 жыл бұрын
I'd love a video about the balts
@deep_boy63765 күн бұрын
The East Slavic region, encompassing modern-day Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus, has a rich history deeply influenced by the Kievan Rus, a medieval state that emerged in the 9th century. This period is a cornerstone for many *history documentaries*, as it marked the beginning of Slavic culture, Orthodox Christianity, and early state formation in Eastern Europe.
@vrixphillips4 жыл бұрын
"The Eastern Orthodox Christians have the prettiest churches, so I guess I'll convert to that."
@lerunya174 жыл бұрын
@Внук Ельцина not Russia-_-
@Ammmssk5 жыл бұрын
great video! hungary next !! or the romances people in the balkans + romania
@TheLocalLt4 жыл бұрын
The rurikid dynasty founded both the Kievan Rus and the Russian Tsardom, which Ivan the terrible created hundreds of years later after expelling the mongols
@mikeg2306 Жыл бұрын
Fun Fact: Ivan and nominally his son Fyodor were the last rulers of the Rurikid dynasty, meaning the dynasty lasted over 500 years. Also Ivan styled himself Czar (i.e. Caesar) because he was literally the grandson of a Byzantine princess, niece of the last Byzantine Emperor. By Ivan’s time the Paleologos family was effectively extinct so he had as good a claim as anyone to the title.
@anonymousbloke1 Жыл бұрын
He didn't claim to be a Byzantine emperor descendant and because of that, the title Tsar wasn't born due to those reasons. It was rather because of "muh third Rome" larp after the fall of Constantinople. AKA "Rome is gone and so is constantinople now, therefore the only true heir of Rome is Moscow!", that was his reasoning@@mikeg2306
@xanthosparashis88194 жыл бұрын
concerning the avars, which rivers and other geographic features defined the extent of their domain and their sphere of influence at their greatest extent?
@MLaserHistory4 жыл бұрын
South would be today's northern Greek Border (Although this hold on the whole of the Balkans was brief), west would be the eastern ending of the Austrian Alps and the Ore Mountains in Czechia. North we don't know all we know is that they didn't reach the Baltic sea and East again we don't know exactly all we know is that they bordered the Khazars so the border is usually put somewhere between the Dnieper and Don rivers.
@krisskross30765 жыл бұрын
13:04 rational drinker
@myhal-k2 жыл бұрын
I might be not the first one pointing this out, so pardon me for not reading all the comments, but on the timestamp 2:19 you show "Rusyns/Dulebes" over the Carpathians. I find this rather misleading, as we do have some confirmations that they called themselves White Croats (or at least were called that way by neighbors), but we don't have solid proof that local Slavic people are in the Carpathians would call themselves Rusyns at least by XII century.
@MLaserHistory2 жыл бұрын
Yes the Rusyn identity came in much later and it would be more appropriate to just leave the name of White Croats there as that is an attested name in the sources.
@user-0xDEEDBEEF Жыл бұрын
if there was a "new gorod" then it must be old too and it was. It name is Ladoga. the first kind of capital.
@otosart82835 жыл бұрын
Very interesting,,,A good effort...
@globetrekker86 Жыл бұрын
I knew that Ivan the Terrible’s hijinks would come up!
@Востоклавия3 жыл бұрын
Very nice!
@alterix57115 жыл бұрын
does anyone know anything about the other East Slavic Chiefdoms? Also, these are really great videos
@MLaserHistory5 жыл бұрын
If they existed there are no written records about them so unless a new discovery is made we won't know anything about them.
@user-histor4 жыл бұрын
@@MLaserHistory what about Askold and Dir? P.S. Great video!
@starless267 Жыл бұрын
@@user-histor Those were varangians too. Askold and Dyr are Scandinavian names
@Michael-qj5sx3 жыл бұрын
Do you have any explanation for the connection between the Slavic culture and the Vedic culture? There is some solid indication that these two are very much related.
@scammerofyoutube33662 жыл бұрын
Well I guess because the people of indo-european culture, due to Kurgan hypothesis, were from the steppes of modern day Ukraine and Russia
@Solaire_au_Frohmage2 жыл бұрын
Basically, all accounts that mentioned Vedic culture didn't go too much in detail, and the archaeological findings were scarce and technically the pottery in the supposed Vedic region was either the same as Slavic pottery culture or heavily influenced, by it meaning they are either only a part of the Slavic culture or were driven out of their land by goths or vandals during great resettlement.
@antosolegycz4 жыл бұрын
2:13 You pointed the Slavs strongly to the east, Finno-Ugrics lived along the Volga
@bossschmutzfink98653 жыл бұрын
Finno Ugrics lived everywhere in northern European Russia.
@Armorius21995 жыл бұрын
Early history of the Greeks!
@thebelltower8040 Жыл бұрын
Velikiy Novgorod first mentioned in 859 AD in its own town's Chronicles. By the way there is the town of Staraya Ladoga witch is connected with Novgorod region and Orik (Rurik) dynasty as well, and it was founded in at least in 750 by slav tribes. So actually historic Rurik's Novgorod can be also "Rurikovo gorodische" that is located few kilometers otside of Velikiy Novgorod (The Varangian name of the city Holmgård or Holmgard (Holmgarðr or Holmgarðir) is mentioned in Norse Sagas as existing at a yet earlier stage, but the correlation of this reference with the actual city is uncertain. Originally, Holmgård referred to the stronghold, now only 2 km (1.2 miles) to the south of the center of the present-day city, Rurikovo Gorodische.)
@qweasdoUAttgl5300 Жыл бұрын
Thx for map on preview
@madmasseur642210 ай бұрын
13:21 if he only knew about the Gothic style of architecture
@rsabinioan4 жыл бұрын
Imagine Russia these days being jewish lol Edit: well oh..
@czowiekbezperspektyw46284 жыл бұрын
U know that half of communist goverment were jews?
@rsabinioan4 жыл бұрын
@@czowiekbezperspektyw4628 thats why i ironically said "oh wait"
@czowiekbezperspektyw46284 жыл бұрын
@42 No its not. Half of soviet goverment were jews. Stalin wife also
@czowiekbezperspektyw46284 жыл бұрын
@42 www.timesofisrael.com/putin-first-soviet-government-was-mostly-jewish/ Trocky was a jew Brezhen said : "I am a Jew. I want to live in the Jewish state. That is my right, just as it is the rights of a Ukrainian to live in the Ukraine, the right of a Russian to live in Russia, the right of a Georgian to live in Georgia. I want to live in Israel. That is my dream, that is the goal not only of my life but also of the lives of hundreds of generation that preceded me, of my ancestors who were expelled from their land. I want to my children to study in the Hebrew language. I want to read Jewish papers, I want to attend a Jewish theatre. What is wrong with that? What is my crime ...?"
@czowiekbezperspektyw46284 жыл бұрын
@Krupa Brezhnev
@whaddyamean994 жыл бұрын
I wrote a paper last year about the authorship of the Primary Chronicle. There are many inconsistencies and my basic conclusion is that while we don't necessarily know who wrote it, it was almost certainly not Nestor
@LunarEchoes14 жыл бұрын
I’m Catholic but I’m Slav I’m from the west Bosnia and Herzegovina not far away from Croatia
@atewebg4 жыл бұрын
what about volga bulgaria?
@erikmarsicek51535 жыл бұрын
you should do an episode on battles like agencourt
@ssw19882 жыл бұрын
Busy pwning each other in the 21st Century...
@hlibushok2 жыл бұрын
I'll write down the list of Rus' monarchs mentioned in this video and their deeds because writing helps memorizing. Maybe someone will find this helpful: Rurik (862 - 869) - conquered one of the northern Slavic chiefdoms and established himself as the ruler there. Died. Oleg (879 - _940_ ) - Rurik's kin. Acted as a regent for Rurik's son Igor. Did a lot of conquest including Kyiv, which became the realm's new capital. Lost a war against Igor over the throne. Igor ( _912_ - 945) - Rurik's son. Won a war against Oleg over the throne. Fought Byzantines and Khazars. Was brutally killed by his subjects from the Drevlia tribe for demanding too much tribute. Olga (945 - 960) - Igor's wife. Sviatoslav's mother and regent. Avenged her husband by burning down the Drevlian capital. Centralized power. Enacted law reforms. Adopted Christianity. Sviatoslav (960 - 972) - Was pagan. Fought the bordering nomadic tribes. Lost a battle to the Byzantines. Was ambushed and killed by their allies - nomadic Pechenegs. Yaropolk (972 - 978) - Sviatoslav's son. Defeated his brothers Oleg (killed) and Vladimir (fled) in a succession crisis. Lost all the conquests of his dad. Was killed by Vladimir. Vladimir (978 - 1015) - Sviatoslav's bastard son. Was defeated by his brother Yaropolk in a succession crisis and fled to Norway. Gathered an army there and retook the throne. Reconquered some of his dad's conquests. Converted the country to Orthodox Christianity.
@poo_88574 жыл бұрын
East Slav gang
@crazygoat25945 жыл бұрын
4:05 wait didn't damascus steel come from damascus i'm so confused
@MLaserHistory5 жыл бұрын
read the description
@andreyche1934 жыл бұрын
There is a confusion of a damascus steel and the one which is composed of alternating layers of two or more different steels ( which is commonly called "damascus steel" as above). The actual damascus steel was made in and around Damascus and it didn't "come" anywhere as it's secret was lost (or a particular high-quality ore used for its manufacture was finally exhausted).
@abloodorange52334 жыл бұрын
You only went through the kingdoms you didn't go through the groupijgs of slavs in that region at all
@WombatSteve4 жыл бұрын
13:08 And Vodka would later corrupt Russia.
@Заяц-г8ю4 жыл бұрын
Водки до семнадцатого века не существовало! Тогда пили медовуху!
@negotive43034 жыл бұрын
@@Заяц-г8ю Дело говоришь
@mountaindewgaming235111 ай бұрын
@@negotive4303its potato so obviously it would not exist in 9th century rus though the varagians vikings were notorious drunkards often drinking themselves to death
@mountaindewgaming235111 ай бұрын
So you know like modern russia
@mountaindewgaming235111 ай бұрын
Did pagan slavs ever settle the Ural Mountains
@MLaserHistory11 ай бұрын
no, they never got that far as pagans
@mountaindewgaming235111 ай бұрын
How far east did east slavic pagans expand I can find almost no information the extent of eastern expansion
@bloodkelp2 ай бұрын
@@mountaindewgaming2351 they never stopped expanding
@erikf.76963 жыл бұрын
Princess of Polotsk: I won't marry you, you bastard! Vladimir: well see about that. And then he did the only sensible thing.
@salar1586 Жыл бұрын
I wonder what script and language russians spoke before 8th century
@mountaindewgaming235111 ай бұрын
It’s unknown as writing only became widespread with glagotic and cyrillic both of which were invented as acceptable substitutes in which to translate latin into by the orthodox church invented by monk methodus and cyril if there was a script in pagan rus it is long since lost or never existed at all as the pagans mostly used degradable materials and most were destroyed in the campaigns to covert east europe ie northern crusades as well as other revolts and wars
@mountaindewgaming235111 ай бұрын
It was probably something similar to old church slavonic linguistically which was close to baltic languages
@superbrutus2369 Жыл бұрын
Dont rus come from the finnish name for the Swedish
@warrcoww67173 жыл бұрын
Saint Olga, patron saint of mass arson
@globetrekker86 Жыл бұрын
“Vladimir killed Olga’s father and forced her to marry him, anyway.” Sounds like another Vladimir’s tactic of choice
@olehsamko7235 жыл бұрын
Do not say Vladimier, right to say Volodymyr. So it is written in the Tale of Nestor
@PseudonymsAreGovnoYaEbalGoogle5 жыл бұрын
1) It's Vladimir, not Vladimier or Vlaedamaer; 2)Old East Slavic language had a lot of dialects, and, to be fair, even OES' successor languages had dialects, like Russian language had 24 dialects, so there is several "right" ways to pronounce some words.
@anonymousbloke1 Жыл бұрын
No it is literally written "Володымер" in the chronicle (VolodymEr, with an E instead of a second Y)@@PseudonymsAreGovnoYaEbalGoogle
@VoidRDM5 жыл бұрын
Go Rurik!
@СергейКопыл-х3м Жыл бұрын
Slavic tribe never settled on Volga River region.There are ugro-finnish settlements, their descendants are russians
@ludwigschneider22584 жыл бұрын
imagine a muslim Russia....
@isadanjan47624 жыл бұрын
Русские это православные славяне, а татары да. Но у татаров есть отдельная регион и они не русские ес что.
@ludwigschneider22584 жыл бұрын
@@isadanjan4762 это правда
@ЛюдмилаАфанасьева-т2ь4 жыл бұрын
@@ludwigschneider2258 Ты идиот
@mountaindewgaming235111 ай бұрын
Moscows 20 percent muslim
@ИльяВоронин-п9г4 жыл бұрын
9:15 Voronezh was built by Peter the Great. It cannot be on the map THAT early. I live here k?
@MLaserHistory4 жыл бұрын
It's not the Voronezh but a Voronezh. A Slavic town settlement has been found in that area on the Voronezh river dating back to around the 8th century. Plus Voronezh was mentioned by the primary chronicle so it definitely existed during the Middle Ages.
@NN-js3vl4 жыл бұрын
@@MLaserHistory , May I ask you what kind of sources you have used to provide this historical review? Today, many Ukrainian and Russian historians claim that Voronezh and Russia in general are descendants of finno-ugric settlements but not Slavs.
@ИльяВоронин-п9г4 жыл бұрын
@@MLaserHistory by a Voronezh you mean some settlement by the river, right? I'll try to contact someone who has more knowledge about the town than I do, but the museums, schools and administration have the opinion of Voronezh being 400-450 years old (there is a proper year but I don't remember it). If it was *some* settlement, however, it might've been anything. We even have one of the biggest early-human settlements in Kostyonki village, so some slavic settlement is not something unbelievable
@ИльяВоронин-п9г4 жыл бұрын
@@MLaserHistory oh, and also, can you provide sources? The pages of primary chronicle would be awesome to read
@MLaserHistory4 жыл бұрын
Primary chronicle 249, mentions Ryazan, prince of Yaropolk, fleeing to Voronezh after losing a battle. ------------------------ "a number of settlements. In the lower reaches of the river, a unique Slavic town-planning complex of the 8th - early 11th century was discovered, which covered the territory of the present city of Voronezh and its environs" Wikipedia sights there sources with this and considering I have read about it in other English sources (that I don't really have access to at the moment as libraries are closed) I have no reason to not believe it. В. П. Загоровский. "Воронежская историческая энциклопедия". Воронеж, 1992. Стр. 53. А. З. Винников, А. Т. Синюк. "Дорогами тысячелетий: Археологи о древней истории Воронежского края". Издание 2-е. Воронеж, 2003. Стр. 185-187, 236-242. Н. А. Тропин. "Южные территории Чернигово-Рязанского порубежья в XII-XV вв." Автореферат диссертации на соискание ученой степени доктора исторических наук. Москва, 2007. П. А. Попов. "Воронеж: древнее слово и древние города, а также древние леса и древние реки России". Воронеж, 2016.
@druzhynets914 жыл бұрын
I have a very historic name :)
@alexeygrinin89415 жыл бұрын
Being slav....That's great!
@MrWr994 жыл бұрын
I like those tridents. One is depicted on my passport cover. I’m proud to be a Ukrainian.
@adnannazifi45326 ай бұрын
Rasha is good to be with European Union , itis good for the economy ,
@MikeMaris5 жыл бұрын
Kievan Rus' is one of the coolest names for a kingdom lmao. Maybe this is why Putin has his eyes on Ukraine lol
@havanascp96025 жыл бұрын
You mean that's why my gov the USA did a coup to make sure Slavs were no more 😬😬
@alekshukhevych26445 жыл бұрын
@@havanascp9602Strange coup, no military, literally MILLIONS of people on the streets.. That's called a revolution bud, and if it rly was a coup, WHICH IT WASNT. WHy DID RUSSIA RECOGNISE THE ELECTIONS THAT FOLLOWED? So Russia recognised the COUP? lol...That's not to say that western powers didn't support it, but it would have happened with them or with out them...Ukrainians have rebelled god knows how many times against the authorities in their history, usually its foreign authorities...Russians even gave us the nickname " Buntovshchikki'. " THOSE WHO RAISE REBELLIONS".!
@ivanhouk71124 жыл бұрын
You are talking about something you don’t know) There was no Kievan Rus, there was just Rus. The name Kievan Rus was given by historians in the 20th century to determine the specific period of the existence of Great Russia.
@ivanhouk71123 жыл бұрын
@@ВікторКушнір-й8о It does not matter when exactly the name Russia appeared. Some states change their names over time) And it does not even matter where and from whom Russia took part of its culture) So all the wet dreams remained in Ukraine, did the smart guy catch on?
@tingleblade42743 жыл бұрын
@@alekshukhevych2644 people of Donbass and Crimea not supporting the thing. You have received natural consequences. When one part of the country, outside the law, usurps power, the other part of the country opposes.
@leander43034 жыл бұрын
fuck i want to know what happens next
@ichtozavuzovsky8370 Жыл бұрын
The amount of bots fighting in the comments is pretty funny. Kyiv was the center of Rus' case and point. Kyiv is in Ukraine, not Russia.
@monarchistheadcrab88193 жыл бұрын
"Drinking is the joy of all Rus..." This, gentlemen, is why nowadays we don't have a chechnya in the size of Russia
@MCorpReview5 жыл бұрын
Vladimir d hardcore
@plaidpvcpipe37924 жыл бұрын
It's amazing how a throwaway decision could've vastly changed Jewish history as we know it.
@TheCarloza5 жыл бұрын
Great video, you obv did lots of research, check out my animation on European history ^^
@KingAGBozz5 жыл бұрын
Thumbnail Map ist wrong
@ArchaiaHistoria5 жыл бұрын
Funny that you missed out Алекандер the Great who was the GREATEST SLAV in history...
@nezperce27672 жыл бұрын
He fixed the Cyrillic alphabet no doubt
@unknownbenefactor80294 жыл бұрын
Why the Rus convert to Orthodox. Simple, *VODKA* No Vodka No Russki.