SECOND SEASON: kzbin.info/www/bejne/mJKrhWWkh5qKqJY A few notes: - We have previously covered some of these battles, but the videos have been outdated graphically and we wanted to present a more clear picture. More battles added, while the research is improved. There will be 2 more episodes covering the expansion of the early Muslim state, and these 2 videos will cover events in North Africa, Iran, Central Asia, Spain, France, and Anatolia among others. - Most of the primary sources of this period are Muslim, but they are largely corroborated by the later Byzantine and Iranian sources. - Speaking of the Byzantines. We used "Romans" and "Byzantines" interchangeably throughout the video. Some people will not like this, but the words are there to convey meaning and if the meaning is communicated, then we are doing ok. - Chill.
@realgamer10994 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video
@kingtalha0874 жыл бұрын
Lol 'Chill'.
@arandurion4 жыл бұрын
"Chill" rekt
@abdullahabu64394 жыл бұрын
As a Muslim I say thank you for these videos during Ramadan
@KHK0014 жыл бұрын
Thank you Kng can't wait for the next episode
@amsn72404 жыл бұрын
Can we appreciate that they remake a ton of their old videos instead of just leaving them honestly this is amazing dedication.
@jpstapylton4 жыл бұрын
Here! Here! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
@ibnyahud4 жыл бұрын
yep! don't mind at all I was planning on re-watcing everything at some point...but this makes things a lot better!
@robleyusuf25664 жыл бұрын
Those videos were briefing but this video contains more detail.
@shahdaniel17684 жыл бұрын
K J I agree. I am an Ex-Muslim living in Australia and it’s better than the previous muslim country I’ve live in. 😄 (my family migrated)
@robleyusuf25664 жыл бұрын
@@shahdaniel1768 Don't come back please.
@ragnarlodbrok17214 жыл бұрын
Khalid Ibn Walid is like that fantasy character who never loses a battle and wins a 100 battle, except that he's real
@sherifnabil96633 жыл бұрын
He’s a character you unlock after putting in cheat codes
@ISULTAN20033 жыл бұрын
@@sherifnabil9663 Lol still asthaghfirullah as he was a Suhabbi
@uahertm60333 жыл бұрын
Go see Imam Ali Ibn Abi Talib , he’s never lost a battle .
@zwareshag77573 жыл бұрын
@@nadjiguemarful but Hannibal lost the battle of Zama and failed to conquer Rome (even tho its Carthage fault for not sending reinforcements)
@zwareshag77573 жыл бұрын
@@nadjiguemarful they didnt even send reinforcements to his father in Iberia. Why should I read up more?? Who are you even??? You don't know me??
@FRD524 жыл бұрын
“I have fought in so many battles seeking martyrdom that there is no spot in my body left without a scar or a wound made by a spear or sword. And yet here I am, dying on my bed like an old camel. May the eyes of the cowards never rest” Khalid Ibn Alwaleed
@NBK1124 жыл бұрын
MrFahad52 رضي الله عنه وارضاه
@alfatazer_89914 жыл бұрын
What a badass.
@Kingdomsandbattles4 жыл бұрын
رضى الله عنه
@thefalcon70214 жыл бұрын
And he died standing
@herodotus9454 жыл бұрын
@@alfatazer_8991 He murdered Christian children.
@farazaltaf14212 жыл бұрын
You will face those men who loves death as you loves your lives. - Khalid ibn al Waleed 🗡️
@sirahmad Жыл бұрын
He is hero and inspiration for many
@wegweg7816 Жыл бұрын
@hiooxkrmagkis9323 He was just a Muslim who was fighting for spreading the truth and giving people the opportunity to decide their own religion, not fighting for Yemen or even for the sake of Arabs or Turks.
@wegweg7816 Жыл бұрын
@@MA-bi4em there are some bad guys in every religion who are fi.ghting just for power, including muslims of course. but Islam itself is extraordinary, and you become more extraordinary the more you adhere to Islam, and Khalid was one of the extraordinary guys, you can see that through his life story.
@Abdalrhman_Kilesee Жыл бұрын
@hiooxkrmagkis9323No you are wrong . Quraysh goes back to Adnan son of the prophet Ishmail son of Abraham peace be upon them
@UIN8 Жыл бұрын
mm it's also a honorable lineage but you're wrong. @hiooxkrmagkis9323
@Ali.shdifat3 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Khalid Ibn Al-Walid was never defeated his whole life, even when he fought against Muslims before becoming one! An absolute genius military leader.
@Mohammed-nn3ts3 жыл бұрын
The sword of Allah can't be defeated.
@raulmadrid13513 жыл бұрын
@@elmascapo6588 sword of Allah (Saifullah in arabic) was a name given to Khalid. He never fought in Spain fyi
@raulmadrid13513 жыл бұрын
@@elmascapo6588 are you talking about Al Andalus? They were about 8 centuries ruling that place (711-1492), oh yeah, and many places still carry Islamic names.
@yousefshahin26543 жыл бұрын
@@elmascapo6588 Steamrolled? Lol you took over 700 years to kick us out of there lol, remmber Battle of Sagrajas? It took more time to kick us out of the peninsula than discovering the entire Americas bruh, we Muslims steam rolled you in a few years and it took you over 700 years, so pathetic, you're so pathetic
@bizybliztaverage94143 жыл бұрын
Is Wallid that hard to type
@itsame22714 жыл бұрын
"I've fought in a hundred battles or so, there isn’t an inch of my body that didn’t get hit by a sword, stabbed by a spear, or shot by an arrow. And here I am, unwillingly dying on my bed like animals. May the eyes of cowards never sleep." -Khaled ibn al-Waleed
@ragael10244 жыл бұрын
Wow. The words of a true warrior. Respect
@ChangedNames4 жыл бұрын
'Proceeds to die standing'
@Omegaeon14 жыл бұрын
Dies standing...
@safuwanfauzi50144 жыл бұрын
@@ProfRavenSteel Khalid, Umar the 2nd caliph is the 2 person who hated Prophet Muhammad at the beginning, and try to kill him, but both heart change. both responsible for the fall of Persian and Eastern Roman of the Middle east and North Africa. ever try to reach Constantinople the capital
@JohnWhiteHere4 жыл бұрын
υlтяα ιηsтιηcт υткαяsн here’s hoping it will die off
@trewytrew63574 жыл бұрын
Byzantium: I can't beat Sassanid what should I do? Sassanid: I can't beat Byzantium what should I do! Rashidun Caliphate: Let me solve this problem...
@EinFelsbrocken4 жыл бұрын
Yup; when two argue; the third laughs :D proven by history.
@wouter.de.ruiter4 жыл бұрын
Rashidun Caliphate: hold my non-alcoholic beer!
@natsuusharti80154 жыл бұрын
@Sports Ace than the British let me take Jerusalem while at let us dissolve the ottomans
@natsuusharti80154 жыл бұрын
@@serenemountain6769 it was the Abbasid that got crushed by gheghis khan not the Rashiduns
@A_Shanto4 жыл бұрын
@@serenemountain6769 he destroyed abbasid not Rashidun even thats time abbasaid are weak and very small
@lloydthesage11642 жыл бұрын
Correction: there were a 2 reasons on why Omar relieved Khalid from commanding the Army: 1) A lot of the muslim soldiers started to get the impression that Khalid must be there in order for them to win. Omar wanted to remove this illusion from their heads for their own sake. 2) Khalid wanted to make fast decisions based on his own judgment (Abu Baker granted Khalid the freedom to do so) but Omar wanted to oversee any major movement because he was too careful about Rules of engagements especially after receiving complains from the tribes about Khalid as you mentioned and Omar is known for taking complains seriously and questioning the Commanders, Governors and Businessmen about their Ethics to prevent corruption. Even though Khalid is a righteous man but Omar still does’t like operating in the grey area. Omar’s Nickname is “Al Farouq” which means the one who distinguish between Right and Wrong in even the tiniest situations. Theres was absolutely no animosity between them, just a disagreement.
@xalkoonx2 жыл бұрын
I was looking for this =)
@Meetingpeoplefive2 жыл бұрын
Great analogy.
@banipebrianto85582 жыл бұрын
Actually there are 3 reason
@banipebrianto85582 жыл бұрын
The third is Umar bin Khattab choose abu Ubaidah to be the general because abu Ubaidah is generous and pay attention to the people of the city that defeated, Khalid bin Walid only pay attention in war, Allah know best
@smooky122 жыл бұрын
Kanz ul Ummal, Volume 5 page 619 Tradition 14091: Ibn Abi Aun and others narrated that Khalid bin al-Walid claimed that Malik bin Nuwayrah had become Murtad according to the information that he (Khalid) had received. Malik denied this and said: ‘I am a Muslim, I never changed.’ Abu Qutada and Abdullah ibn Umar testified that (Malik is Muslim) but Khalid ordered Dharar bin Al-Auzwar to behead him (Malik). Then Khalid took his (Malik’s) wife. (Umar) said to Abu Bakr: ‘He (Khalid) has performed adultery, you have to stone him’. Abu Bakr said: ‘I can’t stone him; he interpreted hence made a mistake’. (Umar) said: ‘Then dismiss him’. He (Abu Bakr) said: ‘I cannot put the sword back in the sheath'
@risatchowdhury52974 жыл бұрын
I can't believe I actually watched the whole thing in one go. 2hour worth solid content. Pure gem fam.
@KingsandGenerals4 жыл бұрын
Consider sharing!
@zizogaucho90354 жыл бұрын
What, that was 2 hours? Felt like 45min to me!! 🤯
@mushyomens68853 жыл бұрын
@@zizogaucho9035 ikr
@Katharsis5403 жыл бұрын
A human being of Culture.
@UnitedNationsSecretariat3 жыл бұрын
@@KingsandGenerals great work, i never found any KZbin content with full of knowledge and focus to main topic in 2 hours before. Even my lecturer in university can't explain the course without crossing to other topics
@archosaurs4 жыл бұрын
Dude, that must have required so much studying from different sources to create such a video. Thank you for this!
@lolpic14 жыл бұрын
yeah thought about that too, taking histories lessons from him is better instead googling complicated garbage.
@nomadichorseman4 жыл бұрын
not just Wikipedia, but from primary sources as well; Contemporaries if you will
@dhul-sabhatanalkurdi50794 жыл бұрын
Actually its a basic history lesson the average intelligent high school senior may first year college student knows by heart as well as western history. As 3rd world some middle eastern countries are they have nothing else but religion and education for any chance at advancement. I went from herein the US to JORDAN for 3 years 7th 8th and 9th grades dudes they were so far ahead in curriculum. You had to litteraly memorize everything it was exhausting and really depressing at the same time. I swear my schedule was school till 3 then a tutor of 3 to 4 hours a day other then my own work. But im happy I experienced that. Honestly our education system is letting us and our children down even in private school. Oh and I was in private school here not public I can only imagine. Basically this is mandatory knowledge to even have an attempt at college. Plus Western history meaning not just the US Europe and far East as well because it was all relavant becausethe Islamic empire spread from Africa to Spain Europe and China
@arminius65064 жыл бұрын
Most of the war build up and events can be read in the biography of Khalid Bin Waleed by a Pakistani writer... Do read it, it's a great read and I think only book about Khalid Bin Waleed considered as the best classic generals by many western and eastern historians
@Autobotmatt4284 жыл бұрын
Not to mention the graphics, Narration and editing.
@emreinan77493 жыл бұрын
Other arab generals:"Oh no we are outnumbered 3 to 1! What shall we do?!?" Khalid answering:"We send one cavalry unit to make sure that the enemy cant flee!"
@fahimfaisalayon53513 жыл бұрын
Surprisingly he didn't even know either he's going to win or lose but sent a horse unit to block the road!
@TUTANKHAMUN0773 жыл бұрын
This is what you get when you believe only in one Allah and his mercy. Unfortunately now we are slaves of wordly powers
@hussainz6663 жыл бұрын
@Julaybib is My name actually he’s saying it in a a good way, they had such strong faith that they were certain of their victory.
@user-kd7kr1zu8x3 жыл бұрын
@Jou T5 what you say is true because even in wars prior to Islam Khalid Ibn Walid never lost a battle he commanded
@elhamitaratingan12923 жыл бұрын
@Jou T5 yeah he didnt believe in allah subhanahu wa'taala but his descendant is.
@undajaya16922 жыл бұрын
38:18 Even the mortal enemies (Romans and Persians) who had been at war with each other for more than half millennium, had to cooperate against the Islamic caliphate. Even then they still lost against Khalid, the sword of Allah.
@sauseman0922Ай бұрын
I think you mean the sword of Satan! Don't call it Islamophia, the facts are right here. I shouldn't be supprised though since you people think burning people alive is justice (Hell) 😂😂. Islam is a supremisist religion and political ideology supported by the Quran and its history of conquest. The main message of your religious text is "accept Islam or else"! Even your prophet tried to convert everyone to Islam or make them face "justice", and you call your religion tolerant?! And you really feel proud of praising a sadist and warlord? Shame on you and your people!!
@Obi-Wan_Kenobi4 жыл бұрын
FYI, Khalid and Omar didn't have any animosity between each other. Omar received Khalid because he was worried that people were crediting the the victories of the Muslims to Khalid's leadership instead of to Allah. He demoted Khalid to signal the Muslim's success didn't come from a single man but from God. Khalid also didn't stop fighting, he just re-enlisted as a foot soldier and kept fighting the good fight.
@Khairy984 жыл бұрын
@X M16 what a nobel cursade you do. you fail to defend your religions with reason so you just curse and spread some lies. what a strategy
@abloodorange52334 жыл бұрын
X M16 =💩💩💩
@awepen15964 жыл бұрын
Thank you.. Master kenobi...
@restrokruc26884 жыл бұрын
@X M16 your emogy is not worth it
@Dbadaing4 жыл бұрын
@X M16 pajeet detected
@franzferdinand51504 жыл бұрын
As a muslim, I apreciate your non-biased way of explaining muslim history. Not for nor' against. Thank you.
@dinsahovic1064 жыл бұрын
But... at the time or even hundreds of years before when Byzantines and Persians fought it was in hundreds of thousands, and yet when they talk about fighting Arabs it's "They couldn't possibly gather more than 15k troops. No way."
@Squidward5584 жыл бұрын
@@dinsahovic106 Battles of hundreds of thousands were rarely if ever seen in the ancient world. Not until the days of Napoleon would such forces be mustered in any sort of regularity. The ancient Roman Empire fielded perhaps half a million men across all of its territory at its peak but battles would only consist of tens of thousands of soldiers at most. Supply lines were primitive and it was near impossible to put hundreds of thousands of soldiers into battle at one place and time. The sources that describe such numbers and usually pumped up for the fantasy and spectacle of the reader as history and fantasy are often intertwined in ancient historical accounts.
@zonu1004 жыл бұрын
@@dinsahovic106 after the fall of the western empire, byzantines suffered from major epidemic ( bubonic blague) that killed half of the population of Constantinople, 2 famines multiple civil wars and war with Persia that lasted decades. All of Byzantine armies combined probably numbered in the 50k range. Persia in the same range but even more unstable. Most battles Muslim forces fought in they outnumbered there enemies.
@dinsahovic1064 жыл бұрын
@@Squidward558 thank you
@omid10264 жыл бұрын
If the Sassanians didn’t start a civil war within themselves, Islam wouldn’t exist today
@qaishasan4 жыл бұрын
“No place in my body is without marks or scars , i have fought hundreds of battles and I’m dying like this ?? On my bed? Khalid ibn alwalid
@nazeemsultan1233 жыл бұрын
It is not for the sword of Allah to fall in battle
@qaishasan3 жыл бұрын
@@nazeemsultan123 what a great comment
@badrquenj20803 жыл бұрын
@@nazeemsultan123 Mashallah wa la Hawla wala Qowata Ila Billah
@nazeemsultan1233 жыл бұрын
@@worfoz no. He did not have a humiliating death. He died peacefully in his death bed.
@Topagendadolla3 жыл бұрын
@@nazeemsultan123 kinda humiliating for a solider such as himself. Went out with no glory.
@n-78392 жыл бұрын
“You will have only yourself to blame for the consequences, for I bring the men who desire death as ardently as you desire life." Khalid ibn al-Walid
@AlTarif Жыл бұрын
Such a great man and a great religion. What wisdom.
@buttercxpdraws8101Ай бұрын
@@AlTarif lol
@signalhd97933 жыл бұрын
Army: 'surrounds the Muslim Army.' Khalid: "I'm not locked in here with you, you're locked in here with me!"
@aswing27063 жыл бұрын
Then how was the muslim ottoman empires were destoryed by the christian britian empire. In the end game before the UN and such,the christian armies destroyed and ruled over every muslim empires including even arabia. Deal with it
@signalhd97933 жыл бұрын
@@aswing2706 ? I'm talking about Khalid ibn walid who never lost a battle in his life. Just deal with it
@themercifulguard39713 жыл бұрын
@@aswing2706 Because the Ottomans grew weak by their own mistakes Also you're speaking outside the topic
@tasinal-hassan82683 жыл бұрын
@@aswing2706 There is no such thing as a Christian army in this day and age.
@espadaix15053 жыл бұрын
@@aswing2706 Lol someone is butthurt 🤭
@denniscarr92343 жыл бұрын
This video was fascinating to me. In the western histories I've read, the early Muslim conquests tends to be glossed over, usually stressing that the Romans & Sassanids were depleted after their war and thus implying that the Arabs just lucked out and benefited from an easy opportunity. But this video has shown me that they did go up against some massive armies, fought against overwhelming odds, and wouldn't have succeeded without a great deal of heroism and ingenuity. Khalid really is an amazing figure.
@seanmac17933 жыл бұрын
@quotetheraven90 I doubt that is the case. I believe that these great empires came up with excuses and these are what historians had to go on.
@Kolesha3 жыл бұрын
@@seanmac1793 Nonsense. Western historians are obviously Eurocentric.
@seanmac17933 жыл бұрын
@@Kolesha okay so while what you say is true and what I said be true
@Onlyme20153 жыл бұрын
Western Education has never been fair to Muslims. Its not there to educate you but to IN doctrine you.
@arminius65063 жыл бұрын
His campaign against the Persians is the most epic, he would defeat a Persian army every week and Persians would send another. At last he decided he won't take any prisoners and don't let soldiers flee the battlefield.
@unstoppable-ar32923 жыл бұрын
Khalid ibn alwaleed, the most underrated general of all time!! What a genius!!
@mrsarcasm68853 жыл бұрын
better to be underrated than to be over rated
@rajababy20093 жыл бұрын
it is underrated for Western as they think about their own History only , And we damn care about their History and what they think , Khalid Ibn Walid R.A is a household name in every Muslims house , We named Our Children Khalid
@RazorEdge20063 жыл бұрын
Khalid is one of the GOAT generals. But Westerners with an anti-Islam agenda refuse to acknowledge it.
@primarchjmg30053 жыл бұрын
@@smellypatel5272 snowflake
@memomashash12873 жыл бұрын
Sword of god 🗡 Never defeated , all victories , non have killed him , he broke and have destroyed two large empires ( Romans and Persians ) at once Yes was truth what the prophet said : Khalid is the sword of Allah ..! And that’s a miracle , because if he is really the sword of Allah he should never be beaten ! And it was 😎♥️😊 miracle
@aasemkhalid36852 жыл бұрын
Romans: we have a Persians problem Persians: we have a Romans problem Khalid Ibn Alwalid: I can solve all your problems
@hamidtabrizi70282 жыл бұрын
Arab : we have a Persian problem Arab : we have Roman problem Changeiz Khan Mogual : I can solve all your problem
@luthric14602 жыл бұрын
@@hamidtabrizi7028 do you know Seif El-Din Qutuz
@alphawolf78512 жыл бұрын
@@hamidtabrizi7028 do u know who is rokon ad din bibers
@hassanhlfawi81292 жыл бұрын
@@hamidtabrizi7028 Ha-ha-ha-ha, Genghis Khan failed. He did not fight the Arabs. He died before they reached Baghdad, and no one could stop the Mongols except Muslims.
@mujeebmohammed77112 жыл бұрын
@@hassanhlfawi8129 yes but it caused much damage to the muslim empire. such as khwarezmians etc
@althesian97414 жыл бұрын
Bloody hell... khalid is a absolute monster. I’ve heard he was an excellent general but i wasn’t expecting this level of tactical brilliance. Both empires despite being battered by wars with one another are still able to recruit massive armies to strike back at the muslims yet khalid just kept on winning. Khalid might even give caesar or hannibal a run for their money. Forget saladin, this might just be one of the greatest muslims commanders yet!
@omayah4 жыл бұрын
He is honestly in my opinion the best commander ever. I think his record has zero losses. All the other contenders were eventually defeated or killed while he died on his bed wishing to have died on the battlefield
@J.R.Penrice4 жыл бұрын
@@omayah Best out of Muslim commanders or all time? Alexander the Great was never defeated.
@omayah4 жыл бұрын
@@J.R.Penrice I would say best of all time not only among Muslim commanders, based on his numbers. Alexander has actually been defeated in India.
@omayah4 жыл бұрын
Greco Cabanero i read about it and it seemed that either he was defeated (not exactly though) or he won a hard victory. I think its the latter. This can make sense about the mutiny because usually soldiers actually get wealth and power after wars if they are winning decisively. If they are not, they mutiny. I think that what happened
@saqlainalvi54854 жыл бұрын
@@J.R.Penrice yeah Alexander was also undefeated but Khalid was also a great administrator. Observe how he stopped after every successful conquest of a city to establish a tax base and a supplies, appoint governor's etc. Alexander conquered for the sake of conquest. He died and so did his empire.
@iBaCKeYeZz3 жыл бұрын
If history taught me a thing, it would be.. - Do not invade russia in winter. - Do not challange an arab in a sword duel.
@amaterasu68883 жыл бұрын
@Evilpimp a muslim who fight in the name of allah every week during 30 years : EZ
@alperen76423 жыл бұрын
@@amaterasu6888 Nah. Even if I’m a muslim, I don’t think, the master of the Katana would fail in 1vs1. Maybe an army, that is clever and strategically strong could win against an army full of Samurais.
@muslimman81043 жыл бұрын
@@alperen7642The Muslim could beat the samurai but the Muslim would be very strong with his sword but the samurai is very agile
@paanbon65433 жыл бұрын
they always argue that the only rival for Japanese Samurai was a Knight wielding a Longsword, but after study history closely, I seriously think that an Arab wielding Shamshir that fight in the name of God is the true rival for Japanese Samurai (this documentary even support Muslim/Arab Claim, they hardly lost any duel)
@alperen76423 жыл бұрын
@@paanbon6543 wow, I didn’t know that! Thanks👍
@Driv3ItLikeUStoleIt3 жыл бұрын
The reason Omar Bin Al-Khatab changed leadership from Khalid to Abu Obaida was because most of the major victories were under Khalid's lead and he didn't want soldiers to develop the believe that victory comes because of Khalid's leadership only leading to a major loss of moral in case of his death, and to show them that it was the sincerity and sheer devotion of the soldiers that brought victory no matter who leads.
@ashikrahman48133 жыл бұрын
@ali bazzi i ithink so he waas jelous about khaalid
@sitikhadijah-co4fd3 жыл бұрын
@ali bazzi umar never envy with his cousin. Yes khalid al walid his cousin. Umar al khattab have more power than khalid al walid.
@sitikhadijah-co4fd3 жыл бұрын
@ali bazzi if umar is power hungry why he live in poverty? He is muslim leader yet he choice to be poor and live in paycheck.
@aamirbatatawala30413 жыл бұрын
Calling a sahabas jealous? i don't know what you people are but you are certainly not muslims
@ahmedima24633 жыл бұрын
@@aamirbatatawala3041 i think they are shia. Just let them Clout chase. They are Haters of the Sahaba so dont take them Serious
@linkon9828 Жыл бұрын
When Muslims were very few in numbers and were facing an attack from Meccans, Muhammad (pbuh) prophesized that the key to Yemen, Persia, Rome was given to him. He also prophesized that Muslims will conquer Egypt. And all of it were conquered by Muslims within just a span of few years.
@linkon9828 Жыл бұрын
Al-Barā’ ibn ‘Āzib (rA) reports that while digging the trench outside Madinah to repel an approaching army, a massive boulder obstructed them and no ax could break it. With time running out, and with people’s fears and hunger growing, the Prophet ﷺ walked over and picked up the ax. He said, “Bismillāh (In God’s name),” and hammered the boulder, reducing a chunk of it to rubble. He said, “Allāhu Akbar (God is Great)! I have been given the keys to Shām; I can see its red palaces at this very moment.” Then he shattered another chunk and said, “Allāhu Akbar! I have been given the keys to Persia; I can see Madain’s white palace.” Then he shattered the last chunk and said, “Allāhu Akbar! I have been given the keys to Yemen. By Allah, I can see the Gates of Sanaa at this very moment from here.” Regarding Egypt, he ﷺ took its conquest for granted, knowing his Lord’s promise was true. Abū Dharr (rA) narrated: The Prophet ﷺ said: “You will certainly conquer Egypt, a land in which [a currency called] al-qīrāṭ is customary. When you conquer it, be gracious to its people, for they are entitled to a covenant and [the right of] family bonds. And when you see two men disputing over the place of a brick, then leave [Egypt].”
@CatholicCrusaderofYeshua11 ай бұрын
How peacefull
@linkon982811 ай бұрын
@@CatholicCrusaderofYeshua You decided to completely ignore the fact this is a mind-blowing prophecy which came true. And you also decided to completely ignore the fact that the bible is full of violence. If you are a truth seeker destroy your own bias first.
@CatholicCrusaderofYeshua11 ай бұрын
@@linkon9828 Sure, keep justifying occupation and conquest cry later about palestine
@linkon982811 ай бұрын
@@CatholicCrusaderofYeshua Prophet Muhammad forbade the ki...ing of woman, children, animals. Even destroying crops is forbidden. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) also prophesied the sufferings of Muslims today. He said, "‘The nations will summon each other upon you as you call guests to eat from a plate of food,’ they said ‘Will we be few in number on that day O Messenger of God?’ He said, ‘No, rather you will be many on that day, but you will be [disunited and weak] like the foam on the ocean. And God will remove the fear in the hearts of your enemies and place in your hearts al-wahan.’ They said, ‘What is al-wahan O Messenger of God?’ He said, ‘Love of this world and hatred of death.’ " -------------------------- If I condemn occupation and conquest it will stop America, Israel and the West from invading us, right? Actually we see the opposite from the history. Since Muslims have become coward and stopped fighting the injustice upon them only increased. Today we are crying helplessly. We are begging others not to k...ll our children. Did it stop the Christians and the Jews? No, and it never will.
@minegamer56804 жыл бұрын
The enemy: *Out number Khalid by 3 to 1* Khalid: Then it is an even fight.
@lostmusic994 жыл бұрын
was looking for this comment, didn't get disappointed 😆
@boredidiot16404 жыл бұрын
Walid "Perfectly balanced as all things should be"
@Enraged-vu2vb4 жыл бұрын
then he was sacked and the muslims lost battles
@aymenyahyaoui17714 жыл бұрын
@@Enraged-vu2vb First he was demoted Second the battle of kadissiya that ended the sassanid empire was won without him as a leader
@johnmct98064 жыл бұрын
@@Enraged-vu2vb ah i see that hate of yours ... Well khaled never lost a battle so u calm yourself ur opinion is worthless cuz his action speaks for him a great general with unique understanding of warfare tactics and fighting skills
@refatalsakka67403 жыл бұрын
Guys believe or not.. I was living in the same neighborhood as the grave of Khaled Ibn Al-Walid in Homs. The neighborhood called “alkhalidia” and i used to visit him almost everyday when i was going to school. That was before the war in Syria
@saad_wahab3 жыл бұрын
May Allah help Syria, I hope the war ends soon, and stability returns to the Middle East. Honestly, I envy you for being able to visit the grave of one of the greatest commanders in history.
@bensaadabdessamed93083 жыл бұрын
رحم الله خالد بن الوليد
@bensaadabdessamed93083 жыл бұрын
@RD Do The word " sword" was mentioned 200 times in the bible, in Koran non . And the sword is used to peel potatoes
@bensaadabdessamed93083 жыл бұрын
@RD Do ok , so the 30 million africans were captured enslaved and transported to americas by muslims ? Estimates of the number killed by the Spanish Inquisition, which Sixtus IV authorised in a papal bull in 1478, have ranged from 30,000 to 300,000. Some historians are convinced that millions died. in my country In 2017, the Algerian League for the Defense of Human Rights, an NGO, estimated that the victims of the French colonial rule at over 10 million from 1830 to 1962 .not mentioning 17 nuclear boms experiments . please don t tell me our religion is violent
@abab12473 жыл бұрын
@RD Do Iraq and Afghanistan war started by the US where millions died and millions more are displaced was started because of christianity. Bush said that "God" told him to invade Iraq and Afghanistan. Not to mention the DOD was given the president defense reports littered with biblical verses complimenting pictures of the previous days war efforts. Also, dont forget the last words of the bombing crew that dropped two nuclear bombs that killed millions in japan: "In jesus's name amen" Now, reverse the situation and imagine if a Muslim leader said that "Allah" told him to invade two countries in lets say Europe and the defense department of his country were giving him reports filled with Quranic verses with pictures of the war. Or lets say a bombing crew of a Muslim country (for example pakistan) ends their prayer with "In Allah's name ameen" before heading to their bombers to drop two nukes in a european country. How much would you lose your mind and start going apeshit about it? keep in mind this is all recently in the modern era. NOT the medieval or pre-medieval era.
@jpweek58854 жыл бұрын
This video should be titled, "Their army was destroyed but Khalid lost just a few hundred troops"
@MuhammadZubair-yv5iw4 жыл бұрын
@J Pweek, Yeah. Khalid bin waleed never lost any battle and he fought more than 100 battles.
@MuhammadZubair-yv5iw4 жыл бұрын
Gengis khan lost the battle against his brother. So never stand in this class
@MuhammadZubair-yv5iw4 жыл бұрын
@@DisHappah Hahah my friend you are smoking weed. He and his brother had a battle (i.e fight) over his father throne and he lost. Later on his son had battle (i.e flight) with each other to have the throne which makes his empire very week.
@mohamedalmotasem8904 жыл бұрын
@@DisHappah he was defeated in Kabul, later losing after animosity ensued inside muslim army , so that's one defeat to gingis army in his life , a decisive defeat. Later , the mongol were annihilated starting from qutuz mamluk , who deployed their own tactics and were higher in discipline, then Baybars the memluk lion decimated mongol stronghold on middle east and anatolia over 33 years sweeping the area clean of them . People who hate muslim prowess and valor , say the elections of Khan Khanate saved the world from their conquest , stands not true , in Europe they already won the two well known powers, Hungary and Russia . In Muslim lands ,yet , the memluk were the most powerful power in the east , more to your dismay , they literally ended the Mongolian invasion , a type of people who never let go of losing battle without retribution , after the no. 1 world power established itself , they were annihilated and bit away to bitter losses, they just don't say it , because it doesn't suit them
@mohamedalmotasem8904 жыл бұрын
@@DisHappah which one stands out a lie to you ? The defeat gingis army encountered at Kabul in afghanistan , the later win he got from the divided muslim army that just bashed him previously? Or the change of events starting from the glorious win in ain jalut on qutuz hands ? The ensuing chain of wars to retaliate that defeat , which down played to keep the won lands , which downplayed again to run for their lives and leaving Syria, Iraq, turkey and half of Iran free from mongol control for good , on the hands of ferocious Baybars For 33 years ? Which one , exactly , stands out as a lie ? Or is it what I explained before hand, disheartening hatred towards Islamic achievements , even if it meant saving the world from brutal blood lusting , not convinced except by sword, arrogant people !!
@ghaniadz642 жыл бұрын
Khalid ibn al waleed was an amazing man He would spend all his day in the battle field and all his night worshiping Allah. That’s one side of the muslim personnality that wasn’t mentioned in this beautiful documentary. Thank you
@buttercxpdraws8101Ай бұрын
“worshiping Allah” lmao - is that what you call it 😂
@sauseman0922Ай бұрын
No suprise that you enjoy and praise war and sadism since it is a core part of your religion!
@sauseman0922Ай бұрын
@@buttercxpdraws8101 These people think burning someone alive (Hell) is "justice" and a perfectly fine punishment, not to mention the act of a morally perfect God. What do you expect?!
@Ysf400024 күн бұрын
@@buttercxpdraws8101 how is that funny you clown
@AhmedCheikh-azayemed14 күн бұрын
@@sauseman0922could’ve been more considerate of other peoples beliefs you and the commentator above.. Like you have the moral high ground. False confidence is usually the demise of foolish people.. better your knowledge and perhaps get wiser as to how you address topics that are sensitive to most if not all humans.. Or you can choose to speak crom ignorance, you’re only hurting yourself
@alexwschan1854 жыл бұрын
Anyone facing the Muslim army need to stop opening battles with a duel...
@pixelwortel95784 жыл бұрын
Yeah losing officers to wariors is stupid.
@serenemountain67694 жыл бұрын
imagined if Romans used Elite Gladiators to open Battles ... catch my drift...
@alexwschan1854 жыл бұрын
@@serenemountain6769 Oh yeah 100% morale boost, makes the Roman feel a lot more heroic than bureaucratic.
@rifqyfadhilahrahman24984 жыл бұрын
That's human ego for you. They knew some generals were killed in a duel like that, but they might think that defeat would not happen when they are the one who fight until reality proves them wrong.
@serenemountain67694 жыл бұрын
@a. s. they will send Maximus in my timeline lol *Are you not entertained!* _
@alman298123 жыл бұрын
"May the eyes of cowards never sleep" -Khalid ibn al waleed Edit: wow never expected a war out here+958 likes Edit 2: I think u should go read the replies. They're litteraly so amusing
@yousefshahin26543 жыл бұрын
He famously said this quote on his death bed
@65073533 жыл бұрын
well, he is long dead, was probably kicked out of Jannat for so much killing, but then Islam rewards for murders.
@alman298123 жыл бұрын
@@6507353 you don't understand islam ok
@yousefshahin26543 жыл бұрын
@@6507353 You don't understand Islam, so don't say this, he made this killing in Jihad, but not as a blood thirst.
@realairlot3 жыл бұрын
@@6507353 he fought for Islam m8, also many of your Christian kings also killed many people, but, then again, Jesus forgives all sins so they will go to heaven 😂
@jesontjowari97233 жыл бұрын
Such an unique start of a religion, challenged 2 big powers to war at the start of it expansion. Even demanding the leaders of those empires to convert. Khalid Ibn Walid though, he probably one of the best commander in history.
@haithamalakhras25543 жыл бұрын
reed more about that theres much more infos in books than in this video 👍wish you the best
@user-ke8dy5tj7k3 жыл бұрын
Actually they already know they’re going to take down the 2 big empires , because prophet Mohammed prophesied it, when the muslims were in makkah surrounded by quraish pagan tribe, muslims were weak at that point and lesser numbers , even the companions said to themselves how we gonna do it?? But yet nothing is hard for allah the almighty.
@abdullaevo27453 жыл бұрын
@Mo Mo what sources?
@abdullaevo27453 жыл бұрын
@Mo Mo المصدر : صحيح النسائي @Mo Mo
@abdullaevo27453 жыл бұрын
@RD Do it was always the religion of peace for people who want peace , for what god say :- AND FIGHT in God's cause against those who wage war against you, but do not commit aggression-for, verily, God does not love aggressors.
@cristoforo59122 жыл бұрын
It is amazing how small Arab armies defeated two great empires, the Roman and the Sassanid Empires
@angrybutgoodbosniak91282 жыл бұрын
Yeah, it is very heroic what was done to Muslims in Bosnia,Iraq,Afghanistan ,Palestine,it takes such courage to bully people and nations who can’t fight back right,even tho I was rejected a lot and called ugly when it’s not my fault ( Poor Me ) I still feel bad for our Bosniak women and young girls during the aggression.✌️👎And nope ,I don’t hate on Serbian and American women/girls.❤️❤️. Justice and Peace for Muslims!!☝️
@persianwithazin1290 Жыл бұрын
Khaled en walid was a war criminal. He killed so many of us in the most brutal way. Don’t beautify a terrorist’s murderers. Islam invaders (specially in Iran) were the most shameful crime against humanity.
@readquranandlearnaboutisla592 Жыл бұрын
Be Muslim
@mark8243 Жыл бұрын
Brothers we fight to save both Christians and muslims from the hands of oppressors I am a muslim and you maybe a Christian But remember we fought to only those who were oppressors 🏴🏳
@MOJAHED-XAN Жыл бұрын
Muslims Army and not Arabs in Islam we are Muslims
@tiger_io4 жыл бұрын
Khalid's troops: 15000 Enemy troops: 50000 Khalid: finally, a worthy opponent! Our battle will be legendary!
@julesbrags16613 жыл бұрын
@@SpokoistvieSupreme It's universally known that Rashidun scribes stupidly inflate and exaggerate enemy numbers to make their generals appear miraculous. If you really believe that those numbers you mentioned are accurate, well history is not for you.
@RockLeeKait3 жыл бұрын
@@julesbrags1661 Is that what you tell yourself every night crying to sleep in fear of having caliphate nightmares
@julesbrags16613 жыл бұрын
@Matricx700 Exactly, those inflated numbers does more in delegitimizing their feats than making them greater.
@RockLeeKait3 жыл бұрын
@K Lmao just because romans and other competitors can't match that doesn't mean it's not true. Sorry to burst your bubble son.
@julesbrags16613 жыл бұрын
@@RockLeeKait You're not busting anyone's bubble in your own fantasy world you troglodyte.
@habibiefaried13554 жыл бұрын
I can watch this for free on yt, what a time to be alive
@KingsandGenerals4 жыл бұрын
Indeed. And looking from our end, we have an ability to broadcast it to millions.
@nayomayo6034 жыл бұрын
@@KingsandGenerals thank you so much for the effort!
@mehdibc58524 жыл бұрын
Well said man! Kings and Generals thank you for such a beautiful work and great content.
@cenktuneygok89863 жыл бұрын
If we were to see a character such as Khalid in a movie or series, we would find it unrealistic and absurd. Yet there he stands as a part of the real history, proven by multiple sources. He was indeed the sword of the God, as the prophet foresaw.
@abdullahthebutcher22753 жыл бұрын
that's why they demoted him he was becoming more powerful. omar was a smart man r.a
@elliehamada75703 жыл бұрын
@Choudhry Ali no they don’t
@retrogamer25033 жыл бұрын
@@abdullahthebutcher2275 He was demoted so as to stop the people from thinking that Khalid specifically was the one who won us those wars, because it was not a mere human who helped us win these wars, but the Almighty who did, otherwise Hazrat Umer had no problem with Khalid, just that people were beginning to praise him too highly and some might have even started equating him with Allah (Astaghfirullah)
@abdullahthebutcher22753 жыл бұрын
@@retrogamer2503 I agree with you and read this story many years ago that's exactly why they demoted him.
@retrogamer25033 жыл бұрын
@@rahman9749 Indeed.
@Romanized_Quran Жыл бұрын
The strategy at 36:00 is one of the most incredible I have heard of in warfare history. Imagine, dividing your army into 3 factions, maneuvering and getting them past enemy lines, to all meet up at the same time at the designated target location. In the age of information, I can't even navigate my own city without using a GPS when I am going out for a drive. It blows my mind the ingenuity and sheer brilliance executing this task! Khalid was truly one of the greatest generals in history! Marvelous!
@greencape9146 Жыл бұрын
Totally agree 💯 unpredictable and perfectly executed
@Rashidun10 ай бұрын
there is an historian called roy Casagranda who said exactly the same thing (about this exact same event using the example of the GPS in modern times !) ! Yes really Khalid ibn al walid and the rashidun caliphate in general were outstanding exceptions in history.
@gioduduchadze24304 жыл бұрын
Khalid was a legendary General didn't know this much about him before thanks
@C0wb0yBebop4 жыл бұрын
The sword of Islam 🗡 without DJ Khalid the Arabs wouldn’t have been nearly as successful in breaking the backs of both the Sassanids and the Romans.
@bobobobo31424 жыл бұрын
@@C0wb0yBebop Don't put DJ with his name 😡. He lead more than 50 battles as general in his lifetime and never lost even a single one. He was nicknamed "Saif-ullah" by the Prophet (P.B.U.H) which means Sword of God. Music is not considered good in Islam so putting DJ with his name is disrespectful, I hope you understand.
@gioduduchadze24304 жыл бұрын
@hiOOxkr magkis He didn't only kill people he did great things aswel, why are you shitting on west while someone praises Muslim warlord? also Alexander the Great is mentioned in Quran aswel and not as a mass murderer
@gioduduchadze24304 жыл бұрын
@@yasinibrahim But It's considered isn't it?
@transparentknowledge72884 жыл бұрын
Dulkarnayn is said to be the Persian king Cyrus the great not Alexander who was confirmed to be bisexual . God would never chose such a sinner as his prophet
@EricMcLovin134 жыл бұрын
here i was thinking about how roman civil wars were a mess, and this persian one made the year of four emperors look like childplay
@alirezafalamarzi70624 жыл бұрын
Eric Da Silva Ferreira True 😅
@mustafarehman15804 жыл бұрын
History is full of such stories
@lilblondeboy41424 жыл бұрын
Eric Da Silva Ferreira very true
@alex39876544 жыл бұрын
Incredible how a single civil war can have huge effects and led to the end of a 400 years old empire.
@saeedbarkhordar52444 жыл бұрын
Ultimately there was a betrayal by the Parthian clans amongst the 7 that led to the fall of the Empire. They refused to back Yazdegerd after Nahavand and made separate peace with the arabs and were complicit in the murder of Yazdegerd .
@Ismail-Ibrahim8414 жыл бұрын
Take a shot everytime someone takes the Persian throne.
@SmOlEnSk62014 жыл бұрын
I'll be as dead as all of them. lol
@5ryans4 жыл бұрын
*Persian throne exists* Everyone else : 'Its free real estate'
@tasinal-hassan82684 жыл бұрын
Zoroscums weren't so bright.
@Radonatorr4 жыл бұрын
@@tasinal-hassan8268 No, Zoroastrians definitely didn't controll Middle East and much of the Arabian Panninsula for centuries. And the Library at Ctesiphon, built by Zoroastrian emperor Khosrou Anushirvan definitely wasn't the main inspiration for the House of Wisdom. And Zoroastrians definitely didn't play a major role in both Caliphate administration and the Islamic Golden Age (the translation movement). Definitely they weren't as bright as the enlightened Muslims. Believe what you want and lie to yourself, but lemme quote one of your caliphs: "The Persians ruled for a thousand years and did not need us Arabs even for a day. We have been ruling them for one or two centuries and cannot do without them for an hour." ~Abbasid Caliph, Al-Ma'mun
@tasinal-hassan82684 жыл бұрын
@Warmessage Cyrus the Great was not a Zoroscum. He was a monotheist,and he married a Jew. He's one of the candidates for Dhul Qarnayn. But otherwise, you're right.
@arifeens2 жыл бұрын
Outstanding documentary! One person appears to be a real life super hero, that’s Khalid ibn al-walid! One of the greatest of all time.
@moizkhan9719 Жыл бұрын
Your PFP ❤❤❤ thundercats
@henghistbluetooth7882 Жыл бұрын
If your superheroes impose their religions on others, destroy their cities and populations, send tens of thousands into slavery etc. Etc. Don’t remember Superman ever doing that :)
@sunnya.0711 ай бұрын
@@henghistbluetooth7882Depends on what side is viewing him. But yes, he can be called a hero.
@abdulrahmanalenezi887910 ай бұрын
@@henghistbluetooth7882he didn’t impose his religion on anyone. If they chose not to convert then surrender and pay Jeziyah
@PrimarisAngelusMortis10 ай бұрын
@@henghistbluetooth7882 He was indeed a superhero. The romans were even more immoral and bloodthirsty. They and the persians have been fighting pointless wars for centuries. Innocent people suffered the most because of it. So yes Khalid (May God be pleased with him) and all the other Muslims of that time were indeed real life heroes much to the dismay of you and the likes of you.
@barbiquearea4 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: The title of "Caliph" means successor, steward or deputy and it stems from the Arabic word "Khalifa" which means successor or ruler. So Abu Bakr by taking on the tile of "Caliph" symbolically signaled that Muhammad was still the true leader of the Islamic faith and he was only acting in accordance to Muhammad and by extension Allah's will.
@vonilao22094 жыл бұрын
tsk tsk tsk ,, 😷😷😷😷
@Spitamenes4 жыл бұрын
„Khalifa“ is short for „khalifat Allah“ and means „representative (of God)“. That was the title of all Muslim Caliphs until al-Mamun. Only then it was changed to „khalifat Rasul Allah“, „representative of the messenger of God“. See also the book „God‘s Caliph“ by Danish professor Patricia Crone.
@apotato62784 жыл бұрын
@@Spitamenes There's also the less talked about but still historically significant title of "Wahalimarti Khalifat" roughly translating to "Walmart manager" in english. During the 21st century they established themselves as rulers of rural America. In many ways they mirror their Rashidun ancestors in their talent for trade and their swift though often brutal conquests...
@TheAmrthe2nd4 жыл бұрын
@@Spitamenes well, khalifa "خليفة" in Arabic literally means successor not Representative, so it couldn't be representative (of God),
@Spitamenes4 жыл бұрын
Amr Farouk That may be its meaning today, but 1400 years ago it was more or less „representative“. In the Quran itself (2:30) the word is used to describe Adam as the representative of God on Earth. Adam could hardly be Godˋs successor. That‘s also why the Shia still consider their Imams „khalifat Allah“, representatives of God, preserving an original Islamic concept that has been lost in Sunniism.
@omerali26904 жыл бұрын
Khalid's army is outnumbered before the battle.. Khalid further cuts a portion of his army to block enemy's route of retreat.. Thats the confidence I need in my life.
@practicaldeen53333 жыл бұрын
Get connected to Allah swa and implement as many sunnahs of prophet Muhammad sas as you can. To make this easy for you go in the path if Allah swa and Allah swa will make your heart strong and fearless. May Allah swa make it easy for all of us.
@ShahjahanMasood3 жыл бұрын
@@practicaldeen5333 Inshallah brother. May Allah grant us wisdom and courage.
@practicaldeen53333 жыл бұрын
@@ShahjahanMasood amin
@uniuni88553 жыл бұрын
That's what Nirtzsche was looking for all his life, the Next Superman.
@V8V883 жыл бұрын
@@mzs114 dude you are an idiot you can’t compare Khalid Ben alwaleed with Muhammad Ali and khabib. Are you an idiot!?
@vazeerkhan48384 жыл бұрын
History teacher: “can anyone explain how Early Muslim Expansion happend?” Me: (raises hand) 🤚 History teacher: “anyone else besides *Kings And Generals* subscribers?”
@elkhaqelfida59724 жыл бұрын
also teacher : "we only have 15 minutes not 2 hours"
@imnotmarthastewart81204 жыл бұрын
Elkhaq Elfida 🤣
@1980bdr4 жыл бұрын
Victory is from God
@1980bdr4 жыл бұрын
@@s.ii.5829 Brother, I do not know if you are a believer in God or an atheist. If you were a believer in God and read about the miracles of the Prophet Muhammad and what the Muslim army did and how they fought to the death, and how events and opportunities were ripe for them, you would know that God was with them as he was with Christ, Moses and Abraham. It is not possible for those whom I have called (farmers) to invade the largest of the world empires and to establish the last religion that God has revealed on the earth, and to take the east and west of the earth, so far, and the religion of Islam increases and does not decrease And Islam, if they fight it, will become stronger and stronger, and if they leave it, it will spread and spread. My brother, there are hundreds of people who claimed to be prophets, or to be Christ, or to be messengers from God by lying, where are they now! They don't exist! Nothing remains on earth except for the religion of "Islam" which God revealed to Moses, Jesus and Muhammad, who are the three sons of "Abraham" And you are a free person in his opinion, and in your belief, And if I were a believer, I would tell you what God said in the Qur’an that He revealed to Muhammad, peace be upon him [ (64) Say, "O People of the Scripture, come to a word that is equitable between us and you - that we will not worship except Allah and not associate anything with Him and not take one another as lords instead of Allah." But if they turn away, then say, "Bear witness that we are Muslims [submitting to Him]." ] Note, I do not know if my words are clear or not because I do not speak English and use Google translation with difficulty,
@darkstarvisuals52704 жыл бұрын
@@1980bdr I personally am not a believer, but there is no way the Muslim army did not have some type of supernatural force on their side. An incredible story
@BloodyKnives66 Жыл бұрын
Never learned any of this history in school. Learned about European history, etc, but didn't realize how interesting early Muslim history was. Great video! 👍
@عمير-ز2ج3 жыл бұрын
Many people forget Abu ubaidah in the shadow of Khalid but Abu unbaidah was a wise brave and patient leader and played one the greatest if not the greatest role in the Levant conquests
@Slave_of_the_Most_Merciful2 жыл бұрын
One of the 10 promised paradise and told by Prophet Muhammad(S.A.W) to be the most trustworthy of his ummah.
@neanderthal9621 Жыл бұрын
Hazrat Abu Ubaidah ibn al jarrah If i ain't wrong He is one of Ashrae mubashra ...
@Recreational_Activities Жыл бұрын
@@neanderthal9621 yes he is one of the ten blessed companions subhanallah
@infinitecontent800111 ай бұрын
Abu Ubaidah was put into a tough position. While a good commander, he knew Khalid was most likely a better field commander than him. Giving Khalid field command at Yarmouk was a great command decision.
@عمير-ز2ج11 ай бұрын
@@infinitecontent8001 yes , but I think it wasn’t a tough decision Khalid was the best general and Abu ubaidah was the overall commander , i think Khalid was the best general and Abu ubaidah was a better govenor and administrator he was called the trustworthy for a reason , thank you
@bitar20424 жыл бұрын
"We are a people who were ennobled by Islam, so if we seek nobility through something else, God will debase us." - Umar ibn al-Khattāb RA
@abdulraheem4154 жыл бұрын
Bro that statement is sooo deep because all I see today amongst muslims is that they shout with pride that they are Egyptian, Syrian, Morrocan ect but I rarely hear them say that they are proud to be Muslim PERIOD!
@17-MASY4 жыл бұрын
We are Muslims, and that is more important than the place we were raised or born in.
@aonirsplayground62244 жыл бұрын
Quite a poor statement, basically they justify all their actions as noble since its in the name of their religion, so thinking outside of it would be sinful, way to brainwash your soldiers I guess...
@aonirsplayground62244 жыл бұрын
@@nuranisha9576 The problem with that is you can apply anything, look: "If I choose to burn down this village, if I choose to murder these infidel for refusing to convert, If I bla bla bla, because the "holy book" says so, no way I can be "not noble", and if I refuse to do it, I therefor am sinful"... Yeh its a nice excuse to apply to whats convenient to you.
@imperator6924 жыл бұрын
@@aonirsplayground6224 Lol, you don't understand the saying. It means that before Islam his people were savage and sinful, but because of Islam they have achieved nobility.
@jhonfrederick98734 жыл бұрын
He faought over hundreds of battles and died on his bed RESPECT!
@husseinezz0074 жыл бұрын
When Khaled bin Al-Walid attended the death, he said: “I witnessed a hundred or so creeps, and there is no place in my body for an inch except a blow, a stab or a throw, and I die on my bed, so the eyes of the cowards did not sleep! And I have no business, I hope that there is no god but God, and I am keen on it
@jhonfrederick98734 жыл бұрын
@@husseinezz007 wow......why he so underrated tho?
@MohammadMP74 жыл бұрын
@@jhonfrederick9873 probably because of his muslim background
@jhonfrederick98734 жыл бұрын
@@MohammadMP7 so that is why he underrated? Just that he is muslim? Historians are just selfishes!i know if he was a christian he he would probably be on every history book about warriors
@MohammadMP74 жыл бұрын
@@jhonfrederick9873 sad but true, atleast it seems like more people acknowledge how good of a warrior he was
@OA72 жыл бұрын
Arabian Hejazi knight Khalid Ibn Al Walid: The sword of God. Hejaz History is amazing. The land of Abraham and his first son Ishmael "peace be upon them".
@eternaljade974 жыл бұрын
Sassanid general: It's time to DUEL! Khalid Ibn el Walid: I'm about to end this man's whole career.
@GuderII4 жыл бұрын
Literary ..
@maazghulamullah19154 жыл бұрын
😭😭😭
@AmineEssahfi4 жыл бұрын
Whole life*
@KJ-is5ug4 жыл бұрын
Rising of the desert cult
@YouhavetoBelieve33474 жыл бұрын
Only cus both Empires had been completely militarily exhausted on both sides by 500 years of non stop warfare lmao
@RJTrenbath3 жыл бұрын
It really is incredible that all of this - from the Prophet arriving at Medina to developing and spreading a religion across vast expanses of sparsely populated desert to going toe-to-toe with two of the largest empires the world has ever seen while fielding tens of thousands of soldiers - happened in only 15 years.
@علي-ش7ث8ب3 жыл бұрын
🟨🟨Jesus lived in the region called today Middle east,that's why you should check what historical sources in this region are saying,history is about sources not "theories",Jesus was the Messiah simply a man,a reformer of faith.The majority of people under Romans and then later Byzintines in Syria,Iraq,Egypt,North Africa,part of central Asia and even Goths in Eastern Europe and Spain, and Germanic nations believed in Jesus simply as a prophet of God but Romans and Byzintines under the fast spread of the movement founded by Jesus tried to save the ideology of the impire which is paganism by integrating the new faith into their ideology and this is how "christianity was born" and they forced it on people around the ancient World with persecution,burning religious books and hisorical sources ,all what happened from the 1st century AD till modern era has been about this struggle,nations in what's now called Muslim World and in Spain for some period of time accepted Islam since it's close to their faith and Islam gave them religious freedom and these nations fought with Muslims and this why Islam spread so fast in few years , European nations stood against the Church in Rome and Constantinople but with time the Church was able to spread their political ideology,this period was called the "Darks ages" and it's the Church which made it dark ,later the European renaissace was just an other phase of this struggle. Europeans today have no idea of their true history simply because the "Church" wiped it out .
@smiemon4938 Жыл бұрын
It was already prophesized by our beloved prophet (pbuh) brother, when they were preparing for the War of Trench.
@ΔημήτριοςΔαλακλίδης Жыл бұрын
Which prophet, qfter muhammads death there were many
@resentfuldragon Жыл бұрын
@@ΔημήτριοςΔαλακλίδης Don't play dumb, its clear who he is talking about because we are on a video of muslim expansion.
@williamyoung9401 Жыл бұрын
Keep in mind, several factors worked in the Muslim's favor. Everywhere they invaded had been hit by either civil war or were weakened by constant warfare with another empire. Eastern Rome was weak from losing Egypt, the eastern Mediterranean and Turkey, and from constantly fighting Persia. Persia was also weak from fighting Rome and Arab raiders. Africa was also weak because they had not only civil war, but destroyed their fortifications and crops in the hopes it would dissuade the Muslims from invading, but all it did was accelerate their conquest. I also love how K&G stays as objective as possible and completely avoids any discussion on Muhammad's life or the details on the rise of Islam. "Muhammad started Islam, he died, and then this happened..." lol, brilliant.
@edenromanov4 жыл бұрын
I swear if it weren’t for this channel I’d be ignorant about much of the history of the Middle East and Asia, thank you for your hard work my friend 🙏
@Ahmed-bv9rc3 жыл бұрын
@@Scotty-P reading is not interesting for some
@samiedi41343 жыл бұрын
It's questionable for me, Why did the Arab Nations call 'Khalid bin Waleed' a "Hero"? 'Khalid ibn Walid' was from the 'Bani Makhzum' tribe of the 'Quraysh' tribe (Of the 29 battles of the Prophet Muhammad, 12 was against the Quraysh tribe. The Quraysh tribe was one of the Arab tribes of Hejaz.) His father, 'Walid ibn Mughira', was one of The most stubborn enemies of Islam. 'Khalid ibn Walid' was one of the 'Quraysh' allies who had the "position of the Dome," meaning the arsenal and ammunition, as well as the position of head of the 'Quraysh' army. He was one of the commanders of the polytheists (pagan) in the battle of 'Uhud' Against Islam and one of the causes of the defeat of the Islamic army in that battle. He took part in all the pagan wars "against" the 'Prophet Muhammad', After (bayʻat ar-riḍwān), they united. In the case of the Massacre and looting 'Malik bin Noireh' Arab tribe, After Massacre 'Khalid' killed 'Malik ibn Nuwayrah' while he was (an Arab and Muslim) then raped his wife that night, and put Malik's head in a pot of food and cooked it! had also committed adultery. also, the Massacres and looting Muslims of the 'Jazima' Arab tribes (The way it was fought was also cowardly, This is another story). in the battle of 'Ullais', 'Khalid Ibn Walid' said if they could defeat the "Sassanid" army in the battle of 'Ullais' (the Ullais region in the al-Badiyah area near the Euphrates River, 633 AD in Iraq), "I paint the river red with their blood" and because the 'Sasanian' Army was defeated( Coup in the Sasanian capital, This is another story); By order of 'Khalid', the people of the city (They were of Arab descent), all of them (Anyone who could not escape the city, children, women, old men) taken captive, By order Khalid They beheaded them And their blood was shed in the river. 'al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba' says" There were mills along the river, by order 'Khalid' They made flour with bloody water for three days and prepared food for the army of 18,000 or more. The dead in 'Ellis' was forty or seventy thousand people. 'Khalid bin Waleed' committed war crimes. he is the butcher of a lot of Arab people (Muslims and non-Muslims). According to Shari'a Law, They should have executed 'Khalid bin Walid'. For political reasons 'Prophet Muhammad' covered 'Khalid' sins And crimes because he needed his services. Actually 'Prophet Muhammad' was a partner in the sins of 'Khalid ibn Walid'. for example, 'Amr' (second caliph), strongly objected to him, called him an enemy of God, and swore that he would kill 'Khalid'. (throwing stones at his head until he died). But since 'Abu Bakr' (first caliph) desperately needed Khalid's powerful army to advance his rule, he defended him and did not impose any punishment on him. . In fact, 'Khalid bin Waleed' was a criminal Mercenary in the service of Islam so that Islam could grow and spread with the help of his sword. With this description, 'Khalid bin Waleed' cannot be called a "Hero". If you look in history books, you will see many such acts. Some audiences criticize what I have mentioned above and deny it, Some people also said that Khalid bin Waleed became a Muslim and all his sins were forgiven by God. I must say that we are not talking about supernatural matters, for this reason, I mention to reference: I have translated the source address into Arabic to make your work easier, Please check again, And please read history without religious prejudice: .Reference: (History of Ya'qubi, vol. 2, pp. 110 and Al-Ghadir, vol. 7, pp. 158-166; Complete, vol. 2, p. 137; Tabari, vol. 2, p. 503; Beginning and end, vol. 6, p. 322-279) (Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari; Volume 4) (Ten thousand-year histories of Iran; Volume 2) (Tabari volumes 3 and 4;) (The Book of the Prophet's Wars; Muhammad ibn Amr Al-Waqidi; Volumes 1, 2 and 3;) (The book of the character of the Messenger of God; Ibn Hisham Volume 2.) . اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 5 صفحة : 160 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الطبري تاريخ الرسل والملوك وصله تاريخ الطبري ، مؤلف : الطبري، ابن جرير المجلد : 3 صفحة : 67 اسم الكتاب : القرآن شعراء/سوره26، آیه216 اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 5 صفحة : 160 اسم الكتاب : السيرة النبوية - ط مكتبة محمد علي صبيح وأولاده ، مؤلف : ابن هشام الحميري المجلد : 4 صفحة : 883 اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 8 صفحة : 74 اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 9 صفحة : 73 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الطبري تاريخ الرسل والملوك وصله تاريخ الطبري ، مؤلف : الطبري، ابن جرير المجلد : 3 صفحة : 280 اسم الكتاب : الاغانی ، مؤلف : ابو الفرج الإصفهاني المجلد : 15 صفحة : 203 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد: 2 صفحة : 24 اسم الكتاب : المختصر في اخبار البشر ، مؤلف : أبو الفداء المجلد : 1 صفحة : 158 اسم الكتاب : وفيات الأعيان ، مؤلف : ابن خلكان المجلد : 6 صفحة : 14 اسم الكتاب : مراه الجنان وعبره اليقظان ، مؤلف : اليافعي المجلد : 2 صفحة : 90 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد : 2 صفحة : 24 اسم الكتاب : كنز العمال ، مؤلف : المتقي الهندي المجلد : 5 صفحة : 619 اسم الكتاب : جامع الأحاديث ، مؤلف : السيوطي، جلال الدين المجلد : 24 صفحة : 433 اسم الكتاب : المختصر في اخبار البشر ، مؤلف : أبو الفداء المجلد : 1 صفحة : 158 اسم الكتاب : وفيات الأعيان ، مؤلف : ابن خلكان المجلد : 6 صفحة : 15 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد : 2 صفحة : 24 اسم الكتاب : الکامل فی التاریخ ، مؤلف : ابناثیر عزالدین ابوالحسن علی بن محمد جزری شیبانی المجلد: 2 صفحة : 217 اسم الكتاب : نهایة الارب فی فنون الادب ، مؤلف : النویری المجلد: 19، صفحة : 52
@amberlight58303 жыл бұрын
@@samiedi4134 copy paste, I have answered you. Don't spam.
@ripalmaripat53183 жыл бұрын
@@samiedi4134 spam ea bro
@mahdimehdi4453 жыл бұрын
@@samiedi4134 stop spam
@omarmoawad99292 жыл бұрын
Im Egyptian muslim and i find this content very fair like many other contents. You deserve the Oscar of online content for such a channel. Khalid Ibn Al-Walid inherited his fathers wealth, who was the wealthiest man among all Arabs, yet him and his two brothers, Hesham and Al-Walid give it all away for the sake of spreading the new religion Islam. He was named (The sword of Allah) by prophet Mohamed peace be upon him and maybe be he didn't die fighting because the sword of Allah can't be broken. Became the Emir of Muslim armies and died leaving behind only his sword and horse. if i have a boy ill name his Khalid without doubt.
@ezoid5431 Жыл бұрын
One thing tho, the sword of Allah SWT was Imam Ali A.S
@rahulchavan4088 Жыл бұрын
So u mean to spread a religion or change a person's perspective to the creator u have to brutally conquest that area 🙄
@emmettdonkeydoodle6230 Жыл бұрын
@@rahulchavan4088well… that tends to be how that worked. Both Christianity and Islam have very long histories of military conquests, persecution of religious minorities, and forced conversions. They are also the largest religions today so those tactics clearly worked haha
@sauseman0922Ай бұрын
The sword of evil will most certainly be broken for anyone who was a reasonable mind and does not worship conquest, terror and spiritual sadism!
@sauseman0922Ай бұрын
@@rahulchavan4088 Doesn't it make you sick how people praise and love religions that are rooted in political ideology and inhumane cruelty as a means of "punishment"
@acigercek4 жыл бұрын
Extra context: In the Qur'an, the holy book of Islam, there's the Chapter of Rome. First few verses talk about the wars between Rome & Persians in the context that Rome was a Christian Empire believing in the God of Bible just like the way Muslims believe. So any defeat Rome had was making Muslims feel bad and the pagans feel extremely happy. Chapter of Rome was revealed after a major victory of Persians over Romans prophesizing a major victory of Rome against Persians some 10+ years later and it happened. Worth reading.
@awepen15964 жыл бұрын
I remember this... I read its translation once... They mention Romans and persians.. But thata all i remember..
@akase_13954 жыл бұрын
Suat thank you brother for sharing this information PROUND TO BE A MUSLIM
@Banditxam44 жыл бұрын
@@MyDefendor this is why kruds should not get their own country 🤣
@asomebody34484 жыл бұрын
@davidl0917 ofc an atheist is claiming our holy Quran has been changed
@Sakibkhan-on9hw4 жыл бұрын
the quran is the most preserved book historically . look up your facts and stop reading fake articles with fake history on the internet please
@bramvanhooijdonk11854 жыл бұрын
Kings and generals spoiling us this quarantine
@Muhammad.14 жыл бұрын
As Khalid did
@A_Shanto4 жыл бұрын
@@anasevi9456 read history Theophanes the byzantine historyan says their number is around 80,000- 140,000 so byzantine are outnumber thats not lie
@serenemountain67694 жыл бұрын
you are 100% right ! Muslim history is very Rich!
@serenemountain67694 жыл бұрын
@Gazi Arian Ahmed Yes, our numeric system came from the Islamic Golden Age : ) among other things ... Credit is due ,where Credit is due!
@cardinalhistory60454 жыл бұрын
@@anasevi9456 I've got ocean front property in Arizona
@defenderofeu70064 жыл бұрын
Khalid ibn Walid: Undisputed Undeafeated Champion.
@lyrooo3264 жыл бұрын
I'm amazed at the feats of that man.
@maxmuller86334 жыл бұрын
@@lyrooo326 He is one of the only general that had me amazed.
@قآھړآلْطۈآغڀٿ4 жыл бұрын
He is the Sword of God as the Prophet Muhammad called him. No man and no army can defeat him.
@قآھړآلْطۈآغڀٿ4 жыл бұрын
@@mohamadahmad5973 Alexander is nothing compared to Khalid in Al Walid
@dherghamalhilo59664 жыл бұрын
I really hope you reread your history. Khalid Ibn al Walid was not so brave. There’s another man that took the spotlight for his massive accomplishments and also took the banner of Muhammad from Khalid because he put too much fear in the people of Mecca with the way he was flaunting it. Search up Ali ibn abi talib.
@AdnanAizal5 ай бұрын
عظیم عرب جنگجو اور صحابی رسول صلی اللّٰہ صلی علیہ السلام۔ اللہ تعالیٰ ان کے درجات بلند کرے آمین
@Abdullah..........4 жыл бұрын
Umar RA relieved Khalid RA because people increasingly started to put their faith in him and Umar RA believed that this weakened their faith in Allah. It was not out of any personal animosity. These caliphs were not typical monarchs, but spiritual leaders as well. So Umar (RA) showed the people that the victories were from Allah, hence strengthening their faith.
@fulltimetravelersftt22323 жыл бұрын
Exactly Bro.. ❤️
@rashidabdarrahman52343 жыл бұрын
It's the wrong decision, although I love 💘 umar, what you forget is that the Noble prophet Muhammad s.a.w) and Abu bakr would never have demoted him, sword of Allah, remember..
@dose1433 жыл бұрын
@Rashid...it would have no worries if Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was alive but he was not. Omar was worried Khalid (ra )would have been treated like how Shia treats Ali (ra)right now
@samiedi41343 жыл бұрын
It's questionable for me, Why did the Arab Nations call 'Khalid bin Waleed' a "Hero"? 'Khalid ibn Walid' was from the 'Bani Makhzum' tribe of the 'Quraysh' tribe (Of the 29 battles of the Prophet Muhammad, 12 was against the Quraysh tribe. The Quraysh tribe was one of the Arab tribes of Hejaz.) His father, 'Walid ibn Mughira', was one of The most stubborn enemies of Islam. 'Khalid ibn Walid' was one of the 'Quraysh' allies who had the "position of the Dome," meaning the arsenal and ammunition, as well as the position of head of the 'Quraysh' army. He was one of the commanders of the polytheists (pagan) in the battle of 'Uhud' Against Islam and one of the causes of the defeat of the Islamic army in that battle. He took part in all the pagan wars "against" the 'Prophet Muhammad', After (bayʻat ar-riḍwān), they united. In the case of the Massacre and looting 'Malik bin Noireh' Arab tribe, After Massacre 'Khalid' killed 'Malik ibn Nuwayrah' while he was (an Arab and Muslim) then raped his wife that night, and put Malik's head in a pot of food and cooked it! had also committed adultery. also, the Massacres and looting Muslims of the 'Jazima' Arab tribes (The way it was fought was also cowardly, This is another story). in the battle of 'Ullais', 'Khalid Ibn Walid' said if they could defeat the "Sassanid" army in the battle of 'Ullais' (the Ullais region in the al-Badiyah area near the Euphrates River, 633 AD in Iraq), "I paint the river red with their blood" and because the 'Sasanian' Army was defeated( Coup in the Sasanian capital, This is another story); By order of 'Khalid', the people of the city (They were of Arab descent), all of them (Anyone who could not escape the city, children, women, old men) taken captive, By order Khalid They beheaded them And their blood was shed in the river. 'al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba' says" There were mills along the river, by order 'Khalid' They made flour with bloody water for three days and prepared food for the army of 18,000 or more. The dead in 'Ellis' was forty or seventy thousand people. 'Khalid bin Waleed' committed war crimes. he is the butcher of a lot of Arab people (Muslims and non-Muslims). According to Shari'a Law, They should have executed 'Khalid bin Walid'. For political reasons 'Prophet Muhammad' covered 'Khalid' sins And crimes because he needed his services. Actually 'Prophet Muhammad' was a partner in the sins of 'Khalid ibn Walid'. for example, 'Amr' (second caliph), strongly objected to him, called him an enemy of God, and swore that he would kill 'Khalid'. (throwing stones at his head until he died). But since 'Abu Bakr' (first caliph) desperately needed Khalid's powerful army to advance his rule, he defended him and did not impose any punishment on him. . In fact, 'Khalid bin Waleed' was a criminal Mercenary in the service of Islam so that Islam could grow and spread with the help of his sword. With this description, 'Khalid bin Waleed' cannot be called a "Hero". If you look in history books, you will see many such acts. Some audiences criticize what I have mentioned above and deny it, Some people also said that Khalid bin Waleed became a Muslim and all his sins were forgiven by God. I must say that we are not talking about supernatural matters, for this reason, I mention to reference: I have translated the source address into Arabic to make your work easier, Please check again, And please read history without religious prejudice: .Reference: (History of Ya'qubi, vol. 2, pp. 110 and Al-Ghadir, vol. 7, pp. 158-166; Complete, vol. 2, p. 137; Tabari, vol. 2, p. 503; Beginning and end, vol. 6, p. 322-279) (Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari; Volume 4) (Ten thousand-year histories of Iran; Volume 2) (Tabari volumes 3 and 4;) (The Book of the Prophet's Wars; Muhammad ibn Amr Al-Waqidi; Volumes 1, 2 and 3;) (The book of the character of the Messenger of God; Ibn Hisham Volume 2.) . اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 5 صفحة : 160 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الطبري تاريخ الرسل والملوك وصله تاريخ الطبري ، مؤلف : الطبري، ابن جرير المجلد : 3 صفحة : 67 اسم الكتاب : القرآن شعراء/سوره26، آیه216 اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 5 صفحة : 160 اسم الكتاب : السيرة النبوية - ط مكتبة محمد علي صبيح وأولاده ، مؤلف : ابن هشام الحميري المجلد : 4 صفحة : 883 اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 8 صفحة : 74 اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 9 صفحة : 73 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الطبري تاريخ الرسل والملوك وصله تاريخ الطبري ، مؤلف : الطبري، ابن جرير المجلد : 3 صفحة : 280 اسم الكتاب : الاغانی ، مؤلف : ابو الفرج الإصفهاني المجلد : 15 صفحة : 203 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد: 2 صفحة : 24 اسم الكتاب : المختصر في اخبار البشر ، مؤلف : أبو الفداء المجلد : 1 صفحة : 158 اسم الكتاب : وفيات الأعيان ، مؤلف : ابن خلكان المجلد : 6 صفحة : 14 اسم الكتاب : مراه الجنان وعبره اليقظان ، مؤلف : اليافعي المجلد : 2 صفحة : 90 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد : 2 صفحة : 24 اسم الكتاب : كنز العمال ، مؤلف : المتقي الهندي المجلد : 5 صفحة : 619 اسم الكتاب : جامع الأحاديث ، مؤلف : السيوطي، جلال الدين المجلد : 24 صفحة : 433 اسم الكتاب : المختصر في اخبار البشر ، مؤلف : أبو الفداء المجلد : 1 صفحة : 158 اسم الكتاب : وفيات الأعيان ، مؤلف : ابن خلكان المجلد : 6 صفحة : 15 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد : 2 صفحة : 24 اسم الكتاب : الکامل فی التاریخ ، مؤلف : ابناثیر عزالدین ابوالحسن علی بن محمد جزری شیبانی المجلد: 2 صفحة : 217 اسم الكتاب : نهایة الارب فی فنون الادب ، مؤلف : النویری المجلد: 19، صفحة : 52
@dose1433 жыл бұрын
@@samiedi4134 you don’t even know the basics of becoming a muslim and you are trying hard to slander our religion. Our prophet Muhammad (PBUH) did not cover Khalid’s sins, Allah covered him. In Islam, if non believer becomes a believer, he becomes like a baby that’s born and all his past sins are forgiven, even if he committed a genocide. That is the benefits of those who were not born in islam and find their way gets.
@hadipawar25394 жыл бұрын
Regarding Umar RA relieving Khalid from his command, It wasn't due to any animosity it was actually due to the fact that Khalid was winning so many battles at so many fronts in such a short time that the general populace started Attributing victories towards Khalid himself rather than Allah. Fearing that such high reverence of Khalid might lead to some sort of apostasy he immediately relieved him of Command. All though in his later years Umar RA would severely regret the decision citing that had Khalid Remained commander he may have conquered the entirety of Europe and Asia on his own.
@shuaybmuhammad10374 жыл бұрын
Not sure about the 'later regret part' as it was because of his decision that he could fight in battle of Yarmouk leading it to the unexpected victory
@shuaybmuhammad10374 жыл бұрын
@Michael Donato i think Umar RA made a wise decision, because Khalid Ibn Al Waleed was conquering lands faster than the Caliph could keep track of + as @hadi mentioned, his name was revered more than God, for whom he was fighting. It was not out of the fear of him making a separate name for himself that Umar RA gave the decision but the consideration of how his heroics could create space for people to idolise him. Any wise muslim ruler will take this into consideration. Plus, it was because of this decision that he was able to defeat the Byzantines in Syria
@TVkeyse4 жыл бұрын
In Islam there is no what if , when it comes to the past , everything happened accordingly as part of Qadr of Allah.
@abdimohamed42434 жыл бұрын
Ikeyse what Allah pre decreed is accepted umar ra is wide and made his decision best on what would please Allah
@MohsinRaza-uq2ow4 жыл бұрын
@@shuaybmuhammad1037 Let my life be sacrificed for Hazrat Umar ra but he did not make a right decision that time Coz after the death of Saifullah he regretted his decision.Sahabas are not infallible they made mistakes and the best part is they accept it without any hesitation. Hazrat Umar's reign saw Islams rise but the conquests were relatively slower cz he interfered too much in the army's welfare. He sitting in Medina used to give instructions to the commanders like who will be in charge of the left or right flank, where would the army rest when to send reinforcement. Obviously there was no whatsp that time so it took months conveying a single message and this slowed the conquests.
@SOMEONE-eq5bu Жыл бұрын
can't believe i sat through this 2 hour masterpiece. very well explained and visualized, great work
@auradzrts6914 жыл бұрын
57:16 The reason why Umar R.A change the position the leader of the muslim army was because people start to think if the victory gained by the muslim army due to Khalid bin Al-Walid not because the help of God. So, Umar had to change Khalid with other general to lead the army to teach the muslim that victory is come from God not from a mere mortal.
@m.albdr.k50904 жыл бұрын
Well said
@saadarshad25754 жыл бұрын
@TheSpecialistGamerX2 Now, I want to tell you that those Muslims won wars with faith i.e beleiving in God. You think challenging and defeating two empires is just tactical brilliance.
@mobinshuaib8214 жыл бұрын
TheSpecialistGamerX2 mate it’s all about faith and belief in god he never lost a battle becoz he was deemed the sword of Allah that is a miracle in itself
@TheFreshestLyrics4 жыл бұрын
Actually he was scared his general would become too popular and take his place.
@aayushpatel27884 жыл бұрын
Saad Arshad it is tactical brilliance lol dude if you were told to command that army you would easily lose
@photon8124 жыл бұрын
when they block your trade-routes so you take half their empire
@HP_lovecrafts_cat674 жыл бұрын
This saying can also apply to hannibals conquests
@hassjand26713 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@alialrawii33063 жыл бұрын
big moves from Khalid bin waleed
@keshavsinghal32923 жыл бұрын
Ha ha ha
@rifqihawarid.95673 жыл бұрын
When promise had been broken, no mercy for u
@khal77024 жыл бұрын
Moral of the story, have more then one competent leader or only send champions to duel.
@AmineEssahfi4 жыл бұрын
Makes sense.
@GuderII4 жыл бұрын
Khalid, it's just like archiles from Arab ,
@Khaibar064 жыл бұрын
Khalid had the boldness of Richard the lion-heart and the cunning of Julius Caesar
@nikkollaus4 жыл бұрын
@@Khaibar06 just not the ambition of either man.
@fabbro87474 жыл бұрын
@@nikkollaus which is a good thing. An ambitious general is a dangerous thing; he knew his place and accepted it
@shaks73632 жыл бұрын
Khalid was relieved of his commanding post because the people used to praise him for his constant victories, and Umar the caliph at the time had to remind the people that victory only came from God.
@quirinoguy86653 жыл бұрын
Man this guy is an absolute monster, hearing about him the first time just feels like It's movie plot but it's real, reality is stranger than fiction.
@cheesefan15793 жыл бұрын
Khalid ibn walid wasn't a monster, id say he was more of a smart warrior
@SA-od4sf3 жыл бұрын
It's really unlikely that you understand invasions in that era, but you can't compare it to your "idealist" world.
@AbdulWahab-lz4ey2 жыл бұрын
Indeed he was sword of Allah ♥
@sauseman0922Ай бұрын
@@AbdulWahab-lz4ey No wonder Muslims disgust me! And I think you mean sword of Satan!! Muslim: Inhumaine cruelty is okay because God does it to people in hell (especially those who reject Islam!), and whatever God does must be good! Someone who actually uses their senses: 🤣
@SSFFAA-gt9rq4 жыл бұрын
Arab scout: we are outnumbered 3 to 1 and two more enemy armies marching towards us khalid: seems like a fair play....
@VIP-ov1qo4 жыл бұрын
im dead
@muayarab4 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@awepen15964 жыл бұрын
Mandalorian vibes...
@mvmed124 жыл бұрын
@Winston Maraj 20 to 1 ? Usa , Europe, zionist billionaire companies are joke to you ?
@hazemnadeem28694 жыл бұрын
@Winston Maraj boi stop crying in every comment .. you are bragging by wins in 6 days ? .. yeah but we won in 6 hours in 1973 LOL .. we literally crashed your parleef wall "which you was calling it the strongest defence in the world" with fckin water hoses man wtf are you talking about
@amitaghosh21904 жыл бұрын
Respective spies to the Romans and Persians: so you want the Khalid news or the Khalid news.
@sami123yz4 жыл бұрын
Hahahahahaha
@aducaale3284 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@autumnicleaf4 жыл бұрын
Clever.
@goganii4 жыл бұрын
Is this an Aladeen reference?
@gyorgylukucks9094 жыл бұрын
𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗛𝗜𝗩 𝗞𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗱
@empeemp2 жыл бұрын
The greatest military commander known to mankind.. Khalid Bin Walid.
@Theservant.12 жыл бұрын
God gives victory
@walid56472 жыл бұрын
@محمد العنزي اجل من افضل منه؟
@somaliballer17352 жыл бұрын
@محمد العنزي the best ever, none come close to him.
@yazan-teacher2 жыл бұрын
@محمد العنزي يا متخلف في قائد عسكري في العالم خاض 100 معركه وبجيش صغير وهزم اعظم امبراطويتين في ذالك الوقت في وقت قصير خالد ابن الوليد رضي الله عنه اعظم قائد عرفه التاريخ منذ بدايه البشريه
@sirahmad Жыл бұрын
indeed imagine this was khalid bin walid and how imam mahdi will be
@sherifnabil96633 жыл бұрын
*Khalid ibn Al Waleed pulls up with his cavalry* Roman General: why do I hear boss music?
@giorgijioshvili97133 жыл бұрын
@John Monday nobody cares About china or EU!!! this is historical video!!
@AhmedIbrahim-eb7mh3 жыл бұрын
@John Monday LOL?
@mixedmartialarts81233 жыл бұрын
AHAHAHAHA You literally made my day😂😂👍👍 Great comment brother in the Islam👏💪
@rowanasher54713 жыл бұрын
The Total War : Last Episode
@jasonvanroekel69423 жыл бұрын
Reguardless of your personal beliefs it was a impressive rise of power and deserves respect
@علي-ش7ث8ب3 жыл бұрын
🟨🟨Jesus lived in the region called today Middle east,that's why you should check what historical sources in this region are saying,history is about sources not "theories",Jesus was the Messiah simply a man,a reformer of faith.The majority of people under Romans and then later Byzintines in Syria,Iraq,Egypt,North Africa,part of central Asia and even Goths in Eastern Europe and Spain, and Germanic nations believed in Jesus simply as a prophet of God but Romans and Byzintines under the fast spread of the movement founded by Jesus tried to save the ideology of the impire which is paganism by integrating the new faith into their ideology and this is how "christianity was born" and they forced it on people around the ancient World with persecution,burning religious books and hisorical sources ,all what happened from the 1st century AD till modern era has been about this struggle,nations in what's now called Muslim World and in Spain for some period of time accepted Islam since it's close to their faith and Islam gave them religious freedom and these nations fought with Muslims and this why Islam spread so fast in few years , European nations stood against the Church in Rome and Constantinople but with time the Church was able to spread their political ideology,this period was called the "Darks ages" and it's the Church which made it dark ,later the European renaissace was just an other phase of this struggle. Europeans today have no idea of their true history simply because the "Church" wiped it out .
@IseekHonestY2 жыл бұрын
Haters will always hate bro
@Sidejob10 Жыл бұрын
@@mateopribyl9218are you comparing nazis to muslims?
@Ilovemarvelll9 ай бұрын
Okay, it would be the case if you disregard all the false conversions etc
@Bellasrius3 жыл бұрын
"I would throw myself into the ranks of the enemies until I was certain I would not come out alive." - Khalid Bin Al-Waleed R.A.
@shabirwaziri65632 жыл бұрын
@marouane Attahali exactly, I noticed that too many times.
@classified07132 жыл бұрын
@marouane Attahali you are right howevrr he did say the arabs had more mobility and less armour. The persian army was heavy armoured and are not used to hot desert weather like khalids beduin army also their clothing added to their heavy armour didn’t help hence why I believe this to be true they were more fatigued then the arab army
@classified07132 жыл бұрын
@marouane Attahali thats the reason why khalid always chose to fight with the desert to his back. But the reasons you mentioned is exactly why the muslim army was more comfortable and more mobile. Yes they lived on dates and water which made supply easier and less heavy than their persian counter parts. Less armour made them more mobile and less tired in the desert than persians who are not used to the desert.
@classified07132 жыл бұрын
@marouane Attahali It depends hannibals army in cannae was less armoured than the romans but other factors played in. Yes the favour in terms of arms was im the hands of the persian but in terms of terrain was for the muslims more mobile and less armour means faster movement and less fatigue its very logical?..
@G.M.Cheema2 жыл бұрын
may the eyes of the coward never sleep. Khalid ibn Alwaleed
@omarlibanishaq Жыл бұрын
after reading some comments from some other Muslims, I am luckily very proud that I was taught all of these history under the age of 12. Here in Somalia it is very common that children learn the religion and the history of the deen before anything else.
@berrlett3 жыл бұрын
So to resume all of this Khalid can take a few guys, few camels, few horses and destroy empires. Now that’s IMPRESSIVE. An even better one how often do you hear in this video Khalid was outnumbered so Khalid devised a plan. LEGENDARY.
@alisaleh10003 жыл бұрын
Not simple as that
@Cecilia-ky3uw3 жыл бұрын
i beg to differ with maximo he is currently oone of the greatest generals of history greater than frederick the great of course he still loses to mr takeda shingen mr wellington and mr napoleon bonaparte the greatest general in history(although we can maybe put yi sun sin somewhere on the list since he was the god of the seas like amazing fights seriously)
@asmrnaturecat9843 жыл бұрын
@@elmascapo6588 its like comparing a freshly made bicycle with a 25 years worn out ferrari
@3laaalsoub7073 жыл бұрын
@@elmascapo6588 The Arab tribes were also fighting each other
@WeAreGhuraba3 жыл бұрын
@@asmrnaturecat984 This makes no sense since the Muslims themselves came out of their own civil war. When the likes of Jordan Peterson mentioned paraphrased "no scholars understand how it was done" cuz of how wild and unprecedented it was, who are you to make an lame comparison like that?
@CrimeanHorseArcher4 жыл бұрын
We have to appreciate Caliph Umar's leading. A very solid modern state established. He is also ranked as second most influential muslim ever lived after Prophet pbuh, also one of the 100 most influential persons in history.
@CrimeanHorseArcher2 жыл бұрын
@@ADINSANE Do not lie
@عبدالكريم-م6ن4ض Жыл бұрын
@@ADINSANE don't lie
@DarkKing0094 жыл бұрын
I never heard of the Muslim conquest until I got to college and it blew my mind.
@ivartheboneless88684 жыл бұрын
It was the Arab Conquest they wern't even known as muslims during those times!
@sharafmakahleh41254 жыл бұрын
@@ivartheboneless8868 This comment clerfies that u don't know anything about muslims
@jasemalromi52404 жыл бұрын
There are Muslim cons not Arab
@TheTariqibnziyad4 жыл бұрын
@@jasemalromi5240 nope, Arabs not muslims, lot of chritian Arabs participated.
@TheTariqibnziyad4 жыл бұрын
It only succeeded cuz the Persians and Byzantians were in total ruin after plagues and a 15 year war.
@amrabdulrab49922 жыл бұрын
Correction at 8:45 Yemen entered Islam willingly at the life of the prophet, the entire Hamadan tribe entered Islam in one day which made the prophet knell to God with gratitude. Yemen wasn’t “easy prey”, this implies it raised the sword against Islam while it accepted it without force.
@MeDoAdEn2 жыл бұрын
الحقيقة ان كتاب التاريخ مابعد الخلافة الراشدة حاولوا بكل الطرق الاستنقاص من اليمن في كل فرصة يجدونها مثلاََ حين يذكر القادة العظام من الصحابة والذين ينتسبون لمضر او نزار وا غيرها من القبائل العدنانية تجدهك يكتبون كل الامجاد التي تبدوا في مخليتهم لكن حين يأتي الدور على القادة العظام من العرب اليمانية لا يذكرون الا مروراََ كأنهم مضطرون لذكرهم قادة من امثال ذو الكلاع الحميري والعلاء الحضرمي َعمرو بن معد يكرب وغيرهم يذكرون على استحياء وهذا ماتعمدت فعله كل المصادر خاصة في عهد الامويين واوئل العهد العباسي.
@defensegeneral98934 жыл бұрын
Khaleed Ibnu Waleed best general ever, 100 of wars, never defeated
@geediosman64154 жыл бұрын
@@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 napoleon and alexander come close also this indian dude whos name i forgot i think it was chandragupta or something like that he was a beast too
@Evzais4 жыл бұрын
He was defeated in the Battle of Mutah and that's his only defeat. However he was able to conduct a successfull retreat
@anirudh1773 жыл бұрын
@@geediosman6415 I would put Chandragupta somewhere between 20th and 30th rank of best generals. I say that as an Indian who studied Indian History.
@tomymykes4 жыл бұрын
A very interesting often overlooked period of human history. I feel like these Arab generals never got their due respect in modern western accounts of military history. Even more so with the generals who led the expansion of the Ummayyad Empire.
@pengen_gantinama4 жыл бұрын
Not only Western world, even in muslim countries they skipped so much interesting history of medieval Islamic states. Like as a muslim i didnt even know Amr ibn As is a general or the undefeatable reputation of Khalid before watch the video.
@MohamedTheHilalian4 жыл бұрын
@@khalildz1552 They were Arabs. Not Berbers, not Persians, not Turks. The Arabs are the ones who started everything at that time including the golden age under the rule of Harun Al Rashid who was an Arab from his both parents.
@MohamedTheHilalian4 жыл бұрын
@@khalildz1552 I'm an Arab atheist and I glorify race and my culture.
@MohamedTheHilalian4 жыл бұрын
@@khalildz1552 I consider them Arab affairs, you won't find me giving opinions on Safavid or ottoman or Almoravid topics.
@MohamedTheHilalian4 жыл бұрын
@@halalpolice23 That ummah you're talking about were only Arabs at that time :)
@balrawg59904 жыл бұрын
The Battle of Yarmouk is simply a masterpiece of tactical genius...
@letmesee0814 жыл бұрын
And siege of Emisa was brilliant.
@mousinkhan37204 жыл бұрын
@@laitilulu 30k islamic soldiers vs 2 lakh byzetiye roman allied forces
@aducaale3284 жыл бұрын
@@laitilulu he means millions in Urdu. Even I a Muslim don't believe it. If the Roman number was more than the Muslims its 2 to 1 maximum and some of Muslim sources dont exaggerate while others make it a sci-fi novel 😂
@Gamoo3y4 жыл бұрын
@@laitilulu Bring your sources then, or stfu!!
@saudalhelal4 жыл бұрын
@@laitilulu so what sources are valid? from people who never saw or heard about the event? in your standard even roman history and Macedonian history would be under same skepticism as their events were documented by roman and macedonian historians respictevely. So, in your standards, history of humanity is not reliable.
@mohammedfathi35922 жыл бұрын
Protect this channel at all cost, it's amazing KZbin hasn't yet found a reason to sensor your work.
@sushanalone4 жыл бұрын
The Sassanian court intrigue makes GoT look like a Disney movie,
@josephclaessens81604 жыл бұрын
@Александр okay sure buddy
@miraakprinceofapocrypha79984 жыл бұрын
@Александр First seasons werent.
@bullseye97234 жыл бұрын
@@abdelrahmanwasea5065 yeah mumluk dynasty was amazing .... and the important thing was the slaves became the kings
@stygian80494 жыл бұрын
And the sex! Never forget the xwedodah
@Yanuu4 жыл бұрын
Александр GoT was good and deserved the praise it got until season 7 from there it went downhill ruining the the whole series
@osmanalie6743 жыл бұрын
It suffices to call Khalid, as the Holy Prophet called him "the sword of Allah", and the Messenger was always honest.
@tatoarg95084 жыл бұрын
Yarmouk Battle had me on the edge of my seat! Amaaaazing content here. Didn't know about Khalid.
@hamadahmed54154 жыл бұрын
Battle of yarmouk was surely one the most important battles in history because it decided the fate of the region
@diasiqasse65324 жыл бұрын
Battle of yarmouk byzantine empire gatthered all theirs armies approx 250k soldeirs while arab army was only 30k .(allah gives victory to whom he wanted to)
@sergelucca6354 жыл бұрын
Khalid Ibn Walid is a well known general in islamic history. he was known as the Sword of Allah. although, there were warriors amongst him that did not participate in those battles such as the 4 caliphs. those 4 caliphs, specially Abu Bakr and Omar R.A. fought Khalid in battle (he was not a muslim at that time and the prophet was alive) and he was defeated but not killed. Omar Ibn Afan being the strongest warrior at that time. being a testament in the video, Omar is Indeed feared in his time.
@NorahAlkhalaf03 жыл бұрын
@@diasiqasse6532 muslim army*
@GiovanniGeo3 жыл бұрын
@@diasiqasse6532 wow dude chill, there wasnt a 250k army, for like, ever, until the napoleonic wars, the roman army in yarmouk was more like 70k. Winning such a force is still an awesome feat of khalid as he was outnumbered 2 to 1 but just get your facts straight
@MrDaBBaS2 жыл бұрын
Khalid ibn alwaleed is arguably the greatest war strategist of recorded history
@infinitecontent8001 Жыл бұрын
He;s up there with Napoleon and Admiral Yi!
@forgondor14 Жыл бұрын
😂😂
@henghistbluetooth7882 Жыл бұрын
Impressive. But a bit of a one-trick pony.
@ryster110010 ай бұрын
@@henghistbluetooth7882if it wins it wins 🤷♂️
@ALPHA1255710 ай бұрын
Also undefeated in his duelling against Arabs, Sassinids and Romans, and a known frontliner. He is unmatched
@tamazghaunion91584 жыл бұрын
Germany '' you can't win a war when you fight on two fronts " Rashidun caliphate " hold my beer ,,, sorry i mean my water !!!
@ridhoillahi22324 жыл бұрын
hold my zam-zam
@قآھړآلْطۈآغڀٿ4 жыл бұрын
@GustavusAdolphus1 This is the army of Rashidun Caliphate if u know what means that, they are Muslims they dont drink alcohol.
@قآھړآلْطۈآغڀٿ4 жыл бұрын
@@tamazghaunion9158 Thats irrelevant, thier past is not related to the topic and the event. They become Muslims already and look at your comment: u said Rashidun Caliphate you are talking about islamic period not pagans.
@jionochi4 жыл бұрын
@GustavusAdolphus1 romans and sassanids had nothing left except larger army than the muslim. and a bunch of elephant
@protector8084 жыл бұрын
Let's just appreciate the praise made in Tamazghas comment. His intention was only to show how badass they were in achieving those wins, beer was just modern slang reference, which he even clarified by turning it into water :)
@danraf15624 жыл бұрын
A Greek Muslim Jonah by name, suggested Khalid to chase the Byzantines after the three days of armistice agreed upon was over. He gave his services to guide Khalid through a short cut route to reach them as soon as possible. According to Muslim chronicles this Greek man Jonah was in love with a girl who was his fiancé and was to be married with him but when the Muslim army launched the siege of the city, the marriage was postponed until peace was restored. Frustrated with the long siege and delayed marriage Jonah came to Khalid and informed him about a weak post on the Wall of Damascus where that night security was to be weak. Khalid with other Muslim warriors climbed up the wall and opened the gates and the Muslim army positioned at the Eastern gate entered the city. Jonah's fiancé on hearing of his conversion to Islam broke the engagement and decided to move with the Byzantines to Antioch. This prompted Jonah once again to go to Khalid. The plan of Jonah was accepted by Khalid: they would launch a pursuit after three days, when the three days grace period was over. The Mobile Guard would dash out in pursuit and go at breakneck speed. On Jonah's suggestion it was decided that all would be dressed like local Arabs, so that any Roman units encountered on the way would mistake them for such and not intercept their movement. Due to a heavy downpour, the Byzantine convoy had dispersed on the plateau, seeking shelter from the weather, while their goods lay all over the place. So many bundles of brocade lay scattered on the ground that this plain became known as Marj-ud-Debaj, i.e. the Meadow of Brocade, and for this reason the action described has been named the Battle of Marj-ud-Debaj, or the Battle of Meadow of Brocade. Jonah and other scouts established the location of the convoy without being spotted and they brought back sufficient information for Khalid to plan his attack. Khalid personally killed Thomas (Son in Law of Emperor Heraclius) in a duel. After some more fighting, Roman resistance collapsed. Since the Muslims were too few to completely surround the Byzantine army and the fighting had become confused as it increased in violence, thousands of Byzantines were able to escape and make their way to safety. But all the booty and a large number of captives, both male and female, fell to the Muslims. According to a chronicle Jonah found his beloved. He moved towards her to take her by force; but she draw a dagger from the folds of her dress and killed herself. As she lay dying, Jonah sat beside her and swore that he would remain true to the memory of the bride he was not destined to possess, and would not look at another girl. When Khalid came to know about this he offered Jonah the daughter of Emperor Heraclius, the former wife of Thomas who died in the battle that day in a duel with Khalid. Jonah rejected the proposal. Jonah died a few years later in the Battle of Yarmouk.
@m.thorton93054 жыл бұрын
damn the onions...
@RexoryByzaboo4 жыл бұрын
Abu Bakr: "Conquer just Leva-" Rashidun generals: *"INSTRUCTION UNCLEAR! CONQUER HALF OF BYZANTINE EMPIRE!"*
@Eiad9994 жыл бұрын
@Ammar Hanafi What? he conquered so many lands
@gabrielszohner62434 жыл бұрын
no proof abu bakr even existed .
@gabrielszohner62434 жыл бұрын
@Saquib Khan NO i DON'T BELIEVE THINGS WITHOUT PROOF.....YOUR DUMB...GO READ ABOUT SOLOMON'S FLYING CARPET IN YOUR QURAN , OR MAYBE TALKING COWS....HEY i'M BEING NICE AND NOT MENTIONING THE SICK STUFF MUHAMMAD WAS NOT A REAL MAN .
@RexoryByzaboo4 жыл бұрын
@Saquib Khan Well, but Umar did conquer intensively.
@rainvast89824 жыл бұрын
@@RexoryByzaboo he conquered when it's needed
@universal_human9162 Жыл бұрын
3 years and I'm still watching the videos you guys upload 😄
@user-up1hv5ez2q3 жыл бұрын
Arab general : The enemy outweighs us 3 -1 ! what shall we do!?? Khaled: Send a cavalry behind them to make sure that the enemy cant flee
@MatriouseThaGod2k3 жыл бұрын
Stolen comment lol
@fathishaker49003 жыл бұрын
Brilliant comment. I laughed so much
@emreinan77493 жыл бұрын
That comment was mine! =D
@aarenanas92143 жыл бұрын
@@mzmi1422 talk about yourself, we like it.
@مرماسالرويلي3 жыл бұрын
@@mzmi1422 we like nationalism
@balkan12374 жыл бұрын
Nobody ;Romans and Persians fights for 600 years Rashidun Caliphate: comes and end their game of rivaly in couple of years.
@coolcat15304 жыл бұрын
Nothing like a kill steal...
@boono29124 жыл бұрын
@Suspicious Ned Flanders Yeah, by a toddler who can't even walk properly! Because the caliphate was newly born.
@ME9111194 жыл бұрын
@Suspicious Ned Flanders The persians and romans BOTH had an advantage in 1. Numbers 2. Military Experience 3. Wealth 4. Military Equipment 5. Logistics 6. Training 7. Fighting on their own land
@tasinal-hassan82684 жыл бұрын
Zoroscums suffer from an inferiority complex. That's why they think anything post-Islamic Persia has achieved was because of their ethnicity. What a bunch of diaspora leftovers.
@Brian824064 жыл бұрын
@@ME911119 Well, it's probably not as advantageous as you think. I doubt the level of training and military experience was actually that different. Both Empires were large enough to have to fight different enemy in different fronts while having internal strives at the same time. It is very likely that the training and experience of the troop Roman and Sassanian sent simply could not match the quality of Arabic tribal worriers until the battles in 636. On the top of it, Arabic leadership were simply more talented and daring than Roman and Sassanian.
@DarkMaxStorm4 жыл бұрын
everyone is gangstar till khalid ibn alwalid emerges from the desert
@MahoCan4 жыл бұрын
Just hear his name.
@azizithelethargic92294 жыл бұрын
@Tattle Boad what a strange conclusion of this conversation.
@JohnDoe_511514 жыл бұрын
@Tattle Boad Isn't Qatar one of the richest countries in the world?
@captainsalif47524 жыл бұрын
Indeed
@alexvanmarle82534 жыл бұрын
ever heard of vald te empaler haha
@MohamedGamal-bb1qs2 жыл бұрын
Envoy: Cesar, good news, bad news. Roman commander : start with the good news?! Envoy : Our army outweighs the Muslims 4 to 1 Commander : and the bad news?! Envoy : Khalid Ibn Elwalid.
@Lp-army12 жыл бұрын
There was no battle that the Roman's outnumbered them 4 to 1 not even rome could muster a 4 to 1 advantage ever
@muhammadeisa1459 Жыл бұрын
@@Lp-army1 Muslims love to exaggerate
@BahanbakarSubsidi Жыл бұрын
@@muhammadeisa1459 No worry man our sources is more reliable than others, and you will agree if you study and understand "mustalah alhadits". If not, yo will only become an ignorant fool.
@sherifnabil503 жыл бұрын
Fun fact about Battle of Yarmouk: The reason Khaled sent his cavalry units to block the path of escape on the final day of the battle is that he received reports from his scouts that a sandstorm is heading north from the dessert. Khaled knew arab bedouins being familiar with navigation through sandstorms would give them a decisive advantage against the Romans which outnumbered them 5 to 1. His strategy was to remain on the defensive until the sandstorm arrived. He knew the Romans could not handle the sandstorm because the wind was blowing in the direction of their faces while it would be to the backs of the Arabs. Once the sandstorm arrived, the Romans were blinded and panicked, and the Arabs went on a killing spree. The Romans that tried to escape through the bridge were met by the cavalry unit that sent them to their maker.
@sidibouchrit3 жыл бұрын
This phenomenon happened also in many others battles ,specially in the Qadasiyya battle,which favored the outnumbered Muslims forces immensely, as it started in the third day ,when QaQa Ben Ameur with 700 troops went undetected through the enemies forces ,in order to kill Rostan and his entourage; The killing of Rostan precipitated the loss of morale in the ranks of the Persians Sassanids Zoroastrians forces!
@MohsinRaza-uq2ow2 жыл бұрын
@@sidibouchrit Qaqa bin amr ra did the same manouver in battle of nehavand
@sidibouchrit2 жыл бұрын
@@MohsinRaza-uq2ow , JZK for the info. ! I wish I have time to catch on all the intricacies of all the battles,that the early Muslims engaged in ! The SAHABAS (RA رضي الله عنهم ) were developed and trained , and taught discipline and myriads strategies by the last prophet and final messenger(Salutations and Blessings be upon him/صلى الله عليه وسلم ) !
@MohsinRaza-uq2ow2 жыл бұрын
@@sidibouchrit Appreciated
@lilo77412 жыл бұрын
everyone can do that
@a.g19853 жыл бұрын
It’s mind boggling that the most underrated fewer people fought the two superpowers and the Arab rebellious at the same time and won! Even the alliance of the Sassanid and the Romans couldn’t stop them. I am also amazed by the courageous women that stoned their men to return and fight back while they were in a clear disadvantage. It’s nothing less than a miracle!
@sidibouchrit3 жыл бұрын
MUHAMMED (صلى الله عليه وسلم/Salutations and Blessings be upon him), was truly the last prophet and final messenger; He was called the Ameen (trustworthy), and was neither a soothsayer,nor a poet, nor a magician,and nor a madman (ASTAGHFIRULLAH) ! Even what you stated is understated , as those early Arabs Muslims were fighting with much inferior war armors ; They had three things in their favors : 1: faith (Eman) in ALLAH (SWT/ سبحانه وتعالى ) , 2: Being the best fighters of that Era ,3: Their swift mobility
@chiefrabbi67353 жыл бұрын
This is because Allah was protecting them
@TheBarser2 жыл бұрын
@@chiefrabbi6735 why did Allah abondon Muslims today?
@chiefrabbi67352 жыл бұрын
@@TheBarser they must be doing something wrong
@الحمدللهسبحاناللهالعظيم-ذ6غ2 жыл бұрын
@@TheBarser God is always with us and has never left us, for He has mercy on us, consoles me, gives me of His great bounty and covers me with His mercy. Who are you on the day you speak of God?
@nadjaforster68934 жыл бұрын
No joke i didn't know about the existence of any of these people and now I feel ready to conquer half a continent.
@justworship05703 жыл бұрын
ps4 or ps5?
@xrete3 жыл бұрын
@@justworship0570 lelelelelel
@Aysevem3 жыл бұрын
You can only play Total war on PC
@MaidenLover132 жыл бұрын
Amazing VIDEO!!!! Never thought the early muslim expansion would be this interesting!! Amazing video, loved every minute of it!! Job well done
@Driv3ItLikeUStoleIt3 жыл бұрын
One of the amazing things about Khalid's plans were that he was he such a strong believe that he'll win with the will of God that he takes horseman away from his outnumbered army to block fleeing soldier. Thanks for the details to all who worked on this video, truly an amazing work to put all this information and animation together
@whatever-tp2ek3 жыл бұрын
"thats why he said may the eyes of the coward cant sleep"
@sherifnabil96633 жыл бұрын
There was a sandstorm in the dessert heading north and he knew about it. When the storm struck he knew the Arabs could see better in it and the Romans would flee. So he sent a cavalry unit and blocked the escape route to make sure he killed all of them.
@tomolo26192 жыл бұрын
**////////⚠️⚠️ Allah's prophets are named after another GOD⚠️⚠️ Has Allah forgotten his name or is he just an IDOL!⚠️⚠️//////////*** Why is it the unforgivable sin in Islam to confess " there is only one God and this is YHWH"" The Name Jesus means------------- **"YHWH SAVES "* Elijah means------------- --------------**" MY GOD IS YHWH"** John means ----------------------------**" YHWH has been gracious""** Zakariya means -----------------------**""YHWH has remembered""** **********are all prophets according to the Quran********
@rrhh47492 жыл бұрын
I had the same thoughts
@Glebean4 жыл бұрын
by far an amazing amazing AMAZING video, as a professor of medieval warfare, this is something people should cherish, I'm going to buy Merch and hand it to my best students because this channel has helped so many of my students enjoy history and look forward to the lessons! Thank you Kings and Generals
@KingsandGenerals4 жыл бұрын
Thank you, good sir!
@mcchonky57094 жыл бұрын
@@s.ii.5829 how?
@VIP1G4 жыл бұрын
@@s.ii.5829 only haters say that because this is true the truth hurts my brother
@VIP1G4 жыл бұрын
@@s.ii.5829 this is what you think i won't argue with you because that is useless you will not believe if i gave 100 evidence because you are mind washed
@user-sl9lm3dy2s4 жыл бұрын
Muislm and proud from Egypt 🇪🇬❤️ thanks kings and Generals
@Abdulrahman-tt2sf4 жыл бұрын
you Egyptians do have a great history . hope to see some of it in the next 2 episode how Egypt became Muslim
@rockefeller17872 жыл бұрын
trust me, when you scroll down on the comment section is all about "Khalid bin Waleed" what a great general and choosed to finally join the Muslims after several encounters fighting against the Muslims, i beleive there must something positively interesting about islam which left that brave heart (Khalid bin Waleed) surrendering...
@detectivegenius97448 ай бұрын
read sirah then if u want to know
@sauseman0922Ай бұрын
Not just that, it's full of people praising war in the name of God!