Hey guys, we started uploading our art to Displate: displate.com/kingsandgenerals/displates?art=5f1a2372ed4c0 These are highly recommended - the quality is great and they will improve any room. Use our link to 30% discount the first week, then 20% discount the rest of the time. We will be uploading new stuff all the time, so bookmark it. Here is the video of the previous episode of this series: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qGPGdnx6j9x6a68
@ditodanelia12154 жыл бұрын
make more modern warfare videos
@aaaa-cm6dl4 жыл бұрын
Love U from Pakistan💖👍
@mohmedsaad84644 жыл бұрын
we need your vedios in arabic
@mohmedsaad84644 жыл бұрын
Videos
@mohmedsaad84644 жыл бұрын
We need your videos in arabic
@MalayArcher4 жыл бұрын
Hey guys, I'm one of the co-creators of this series and I hope you enjoyed it! Before watching this video, it is recommended to watch our first season of Early Muslim Expansion to get better context. The link is in the description. There are more battles soon to come so stay tuned for more! As always here are TW: Attila mods that we used in this video : - Beginning of the end: Rise of Islam 622AD (WIP) - The Fall of Eagles (Some of the units have been reworked by myself) - Lux un Umbra Preset - Aztec's Graphics Enhancement - Reshade EDIT: Mods added. Best wishes, Malay Archer ڤمانه ملايو
@akmalfakhruddin72854 жыл бұрын
Terbaik bro
@awepen15964 жыл бұрын
Oh hell yea dude.. GG...
@timothywarren37484 жыл бұрын
Always waiting for some good episodes while eating breakfast
@احمد-و8غ1ب4 жыл бұрын
Iranian?
@muhzak8894 жыл бұрын
Wow, nice man. Looking forward to see the new one.
@enriquevigo17464 жыл бұрын
you can kinda imagine the despair of the sassanids, its not like their commanders were incompetent or cowardly, they were simply outplayed at every turn by the arabs
@natsuusharti80154 жыл бұрын
In wars there winners and losers
@Brahmdagh4 жыл бұрын
RNGesus bleseth, RNGesus taketh away. The rise of Persian empire wasn't any less shocking. How Korosh(cyrus) 'the barbarian' conquered all the sedented peoples.
@natsuusharti80154 жыл бұрын
@@Brahmdagh how is Cyrus a barbarian ?
@Brahmdagh4 жыл бұрын
@@natsuusharti8015 idk ask the babylonians etc
@desmondd19844 жыл бұрын
I wonder how many of these accounts are completely accurate. Definitely a "history written by the winners" kind of thing. Of course the Muslims ultimately won, but a lot of the details strike me as fictional.
@Realitycheck074 жыл бұрын
when i heard "Khalid Ibn AL Walid" this battle is already won...
@th0r_0dinson4 жыл бұрын
FACTS!
@ahamedihamiyun59274 жыл бұрын
He wasn't in this battle it was Sa'ad ibn abi waqqas
@Destroyer93004 жыл бұрын
Same here.
@mohammedmoin71804 жыл бұрын
💯
@immortal55634 жыл бұрын
He wasn't much of a hero tough According to AL tabari and ibn khaldun, He massacred civilians in istakhr and ctisephon, enslaved women and children. His river of blood is famous in masscare of istakhr where almost 15000 people got decapitated
@mlc16104 жыл бұрын
Prophet: learn to ride a horse and swimming is recommended skills for you Sa'ad + army: ride horses while swimming
@sofianeamr73984 жыл бұрын
Nope Umar ib al khatrab said that
@mlc16104 жыл бұрын
@@sofianeamr7398 oh, I think it's sunnah
@abdiali22274 жыл бұрын
@@mlc1610 you're right, they're both Sunnah that the Prophet SAW recommended
@EternalVirgin4 жыл бұрын
Based and sunnahpilled
@zakishan29954 жыл бұрын
@@sofianeamr7398 yes its Umar - Allah bless him - words
@SantomPh4 жыл бұрын
Salman al-Farsi also recommended a trench be dug around Madinah before 10,000 Meccan and allied forces could attack. Hence it was called the Battle of the Trench, or Al-Khandaq. It saved a lot of lives as only a few foolish horsemen tried to ride through the ditch only to be shot by arrows. Unsurprisingly the Persians used the same trench tactic here.
@catboy81374 жыл бұрын
He was a traitor and the most reprehensible person in iran's history.
@aestheticheart88554 жыл бұрын
@@catboy8137 so was everyone else who accepted Islam because of campasion of Arabs 😂 dude wake up that's wtf logic
@AB.9994 жыл бұрын
@@aestheticheart8855 people embrace Islam for the Islam itself. And ironically to your statement look up how indonesians became Muslims
@AB.9994 жыл бұрын
@@gerardb5220 lol? Keep telling yourself that, zakat money taken form Muslims yearly is way more than jizya money. don't embarrass yourself with dumb lies, that makes you dumb
@AB.9994 жыл бұрын
@@gerardb5220 Wow really 😂 salaries for free?!! Every soldier in every army takes a salary and the kharaj is taxes that goes to the Treasury. I want you to work for free and tell your country not to collect taxes to publicly spend. Wow really so bright
@kaveeta844 жыл бұрын
Mongols, arabs, vikings. Never underestimate people born in hardships for they have the strength to achieve victory.
@arianrezaie47294 жыл бұрын
the thing is becouse of the late sassanian wars with every one after the battle of ninevah with heracleus it had only 9,000 man left(this is not accounting for the plague that killed at least a thired of the population) if you notice islamic wars are the only battles where the sassanian army was majority infantry showing the soldiers of these wars were just farmars and not real soldiers these battles are just storys(the earliest sources of islamic history we have is at best wroten 201 years after muhammad what do you expect)you look at persian roman wars the persians were almost always out numbered but almost always won so do yourself a favor and stop beliving these storys go look at the tactics and storys of battles like yarmuk and tell me do they make the slightest sense also almost all other battles the arabs have had have been losses so dont compare these storys with real ones
@hassanbassim40074 жыл бұрын
@@arianrezaie4729 arabs destroyed the romans too , and at the ame time during they wars against persia , what saved the romans is their geography otherwise they wouldve been destroyed completely just like persia the weak nation.
@idries234 жыл бұрын
@@arianrezaie4729 Arabs destroyed the whole persian empire and maybe that is the reason you can't find a reliable sources to describe the persian point of view btw the arabs history books said that the sassanids were always larger than the arabs Muslims also arabs were fighting on two fronts against the Byzantine in the western north and against the Sassanids in the east and before that arabs fought against each other in the reda wars that killed many of them after Muhammad died many arab tribes left Islam again so if you try to find a silly argument to justify why the Persians lost their empire quickly just rethink again because even the arabs sources mentioned that even they as arabs lost many battles and it was never about numbers it was a complex of many elements .
@JJJBunney0014 жыл бұрын
@@annzsalamov7657 Most civilisations have held strong religious beliefs and armies that included religious zealots, including the vikings and mongols. It's definitely more a case of a harsh life breeding hard people
@hederachfedaykin96964 жыл бұрын
A new ideology or belief that makes people think that said ideology/belief is worth fighting/dying for, that greatly inspires men to such heights. That helps alot too. ie: Revolutionary France, American war of Independence and Civil war, The Crusades, and in this case Islam.
@m.nurrohamanpratama7814 жыл бұрын
Everybody gangsta untill cavalry run across river
@SyamuNekoSan4 жыл бұрын
Or when a cockroach flies
@youwentus68314 жыл бұрын
You made my day man 😂
@fathfez79914 жыл бұрын
*Or the ships starts to walking*
@3ktor4 жыл бұрын
💀
@isaacespinoza22594 жыл бұрын
Apparently they swimed 😬
@roscoe40922 жыл бұрын
Khalid Ibn Al Walid is one of my favorite of all ancient generals and battle commanders, what a wonder it would be to be able to witness the events of his era. His generosity is what led to his dismissal, but in my opinion it only made him greater. He wasn’t as attached to materialistic things as others were, often greatly rewarding his men.
@rajeshdevika88272 жыл бұрын
He is earliest Isis jihadi
@abdikariimaliahmed17272 жыл бұрын
@@rajeshdevika8827 he want humanity to be guided that's why he was doing what he had done
@AdamNoizer4 жыл бұрын
A video on the Rashidun/Umayyad army structure. So we can see how they were winning so many battles whilst outnumbered.
@siavashashavand48344 жыл бұрын
They were outnumbered if you were to believe the only source of this wars, their so called "hadiths",religious stories which are "said" to have been narrated by their religious leaders
@KAD1324 жыл бұрын
they had no special structure or special weapons... Actually their army was quite basic compared to the Parisians or Byzantines
@neniAAinen4 жыл бұрын
@@KAD132 they did have completely different army, with a completely different set of advantages(primary one being the combination of their lifestyle and Arabic horse) and different tactics coming down from them(ironically - very different to those commonly perceived: very little or no special focus on horse archery, for example, which runs directly against common image), all this reinforced by religious zeal and sense of belonging to something larger. It took Byzantines a looong time to find effective antidots against this "basic" army, and Persians never ev even had the chance. By the time Eastern Roman empire got it, however, it was essentially crippled.
@jasonblack27604 жыл бұрын
Siavash Nikvand well most of medieval sources are unreliable, which is why historians try to use other clues to make judgment. But the early Islamic conquests has corroborating evidence from non-Islamic sources and it’s widely accepted they were outnumbered.
@arianrezaie47294 жыл бұрын
the thing is becouse of the late sassanian wars with every one after the battle of ninevah with heracleus it had only 9,000 man left(this is not accounting for the plague that killed at least a thired of the population) if you notice islamic wars are the only battles where the sassanian army was majority infantry showing the soldiers of these wars were just farmars and not real soldiers these battles are just storys(the earliest sources of islamic history we have is at best wroten 201 years after muhammad what do you expect)you look at persian roman wars the persians were almost always out numbered but almost always won
@MrGenoHydra4 жыл бұрын
I was waiting for this one. And i just re-watched the compilation of part 1 of the early Muslim conquests a week ago so the timing is excellent.
@Marweezy19924 жыл бұрын
Please keep continuing the Muslim series I’m learning a lot about early Islam ☪️
@muhammadzain88294 жыл бұрын
spread by conquest. that's all i know. but one thing still make me confused.... How can the muslims army can defeat two super power empire (Roman empire and sassanid empire). Tactic? Mental? Skill? Equipment? or this two empire just having their bad day... and having that until their collapse? well i dunno...
@logout0104 жыл бұрын
@@muhammadzain8829 cuz they never been togather until Islam came
@samuelnathan3124 жыл бұрын
Muhammad Zain Bachmid They were partly exhausted by decades of indecisive wars(note the point about extreme taxation in the video) but tactics, mental fortitude and conversions of key people were also in play.
@anashasiba28944 жыл бұрын
@@muhammadzain8829 Because Islam cannot speak to describe it
@mk-oe8yx4 жыл бұрын
@@muhammadzain8829 God was on their side
@dheiyomain67754 жыл бұрын
"il combat you one on one Arabs!" Arabs: *"you have fallen mistakes to one of the most classic blunders"*
@chefar4 жыл бұрын
Oldest Arab trick in the book. they are elite duelists and I suspect they had fun while dueling enemy commanders.
@chedabu4 жыл бұрын
The had an elite duelist unit pose as commanders...
@FallenAngelAbaddon4 жыл бұрын
@@chedabu A rather weak claim. Most arab commanders were installed as commanders by merit, in other words, they were the best of the best warriors. Much like the mongol commanders installed by genghis.
@Solidoaf4 жыл бұрын
Sounds like fantasie and propaganda. Like Constantin seeing a cross in the heavens before battle, it's just something written by the victorious elite to glorify themselves and pacify the population with tribalism
@MT_2824 жыл бұрын
@@Solidoaf its true every arab tribe had elite warriors from the elite families, like the bani hanifa tribe and of course the quraysh, in fact the caliph of the time was umar ibn al khattab, possibly the greatest companion of the prophet and the cousin of khalid ibn al walid, he was said to be so tall that it looked like he was in horseback, he was also one of the few literate people in the tribe of quraysh
@RexGalilae4 жыл бұрын
A lot of the credit for these victories should go to Khalid bin al-Waleed, even though he didn't personally command some of the later major battles. He took a bunch of rag-tag bedouin tribal warriors and organized them into standing armies that could stand their ground against Sassanid infantry and at least survive the Roman infantry. His tactics anticipated a lot of Mongol and Turkic style warfare that would prove especially deadly against similar opponents in the future Just a decade ago, the Arab style of warfare was a bunch of bedouins picking up whatever arms and animals they had, performing a raid or two and coming back home before the intense summer or winter began kicking in. Pitched battles were basically a standoff followed by a bunch of duels between opposing tribal leaders who also acted as commanders. Imagine these very men then challenging the might of the Romans and wiping out the Sassanids just 1-2 decades later. It's crazy
@mirzaazmi95924 жыл бұрын
It's not crazy, it's the proof of their true belief, islam, islam made them unite, and their vision is to liberate people from worshipping false gods to worship One True God,
@ahmadsultan46434 жыл бұрын
Arabs in that time period trained every boy from young age to fight so they can defend their tribes plus they lived in harsh environment and the army were fully mobilozed even the infintry were riding horses or camels and because their new faith they had high morals
@alimkhann4 жыл бұрын
@Saf 299 asabiyat, lisaniyat is spreading soo much in Muslims the word which Mohammad Sallahu-alahe-wasalam crushed by his shoe There are very less who say I am Muslim
@muharremrevani38954 жыл бұрын
@Saf 299 it was the military of islam, not the religion itself. indeed a good part of the arab peninsula revolted immediately after mohammad died... and the muslims crushed these revolts mercilessly
@napolien13104 жыл бұрын
@@ahmadsultan4643 if you didn't know even the Arabs tribes who lived in the small towns they send their children with those desert tribes to foster and teach them even Mohammed PBUH is one of those kids
@Daffa1374 жыл бұрын
Zuhra is the cavalry commander everyone needs, it's been a while since I saw a competent cavalry commander
@al-muwaffaq3414 жыл бұрын
I think he dies after the fall of Ctesiphon
@michaelh48314 жыл бұрын
Do you meet many cavalry commanders?
@mohammedmaster6724 жыл бұрын
Do you think he is better than Murat napoleons calvary commander
@hocine54814 жыл бұрын
@@mohammedmaster672 THAT'S Adeferent time with different and new strategies I think it impossible to compare the two commanders
@MrLoobu4 жыл бұрын
Very true, usually they give some rich fucker the horses and halfway through he goes "wait I could die, or the king could die and I could just leave.....BYE"
@FatriMurtezi4 жыл бұрын
How can they possibly be defeated when they either march for the victory or martyrdom, these are the men who were humble worshippers by night but by day they were fierce warriors.
@FatriMurtezi4 жыл бұрын
Jose Raul Miguens Cruz I was talking about their ethics of war, it is forbidden for a Muslim to flee from the battlefield. “Ima Nasar ow ima Shahadah” so either Victory or Martyrdom.
@thisismeagain864 жыл бұрын
@Lachlan Allen But the persians were better at war, they had fought long battles with the Romans, what you are missing here is the fact that most of the Muslim Army was volunteer army , people who choose to go to war, and they had a something bigger then themselves to fight for. the defections in the Sassanian ranks had always been in the method of recruitment and the heavy taxes on the general population along with a strict hierarchical society , where as the Muslim army offered them lower taxes and security and a very flexible social hierarchy where equality is ideological rather then based on ethnicity or social stratification. Humans crave nothing more than respect and dignity and many a times its above the love of life itself. Hearts and minds people.. hearts and minds.
@FatriMurtezi4 жыл бұрын
Lachlan Allen I’was refering to early Muslims, the 10.000 thousends of saints prophecied in the Bible. Without their Faith which gave them confidence, courage and bravery to bring planning and tactics in the table while engaging in a war with two superpowers of that time and defeating them, we wouldn’t be here today commenting about these events. And he said, The LORD came from Si'nai, and rose up from Se'-ir unto them, he shined forth from mount Pa'-ran [Mecca in Arabic], and he came with ten thousands of saints [the army of the Muslims that liberated Mecca was made of 10.000 men]: from his right hand went a fiery law for them. (The King James Version Bible, Deuteronomy 33:2).
@UltimaSigmarAlonso4 жыл бұрын
@@FatriMurtezi if its forbidden for a muslim to flee from the battle field why did the flee in the 7 days war or in the war of iraq
@Mohammed-nn3ts4 жыл бұрын
They fight to live not to die. Death is not a choise. But if it was the case, then let it be. No proplem. Paradise is thier reward.
@karimmoorad41284 жыл бұрын
There's a story from the battle of Yarmouk where Khalid told one of the Roman generals that "We love martyrdom more than you love women and wine" dont know how true it is but it's epic!
@captainsalif47523 жыл бұрын
It's 110 percent true
@libanabdi7173 жыл бұрын
Truee
@mubtasimhossainlabib54093 жыл бұрын
bruh you doubting? Proof is right in front of your eyes
@entkalb5573 жыл бұрын
Martyrdom in islam means a place secured in paradise. So makes sense ..
@CryptoNesiaReal Жыл бұрын
Actually. He said that i will bring you the army who love death the way you love this world/life.
@amsed81074 жыл бұрын
1/3rd of the early Muslim men died on battlefield. And almost 100% of muslim men in that era participated in some battle in their lives.
@jeffmorin58674 жыл бұрын
@Abdinassir Abdi Are you admiring the blood sacrifice? A true follower of the way would not glorify such things. Yeshua is coming..sooner than most even believe, who do believe. Seek ye not the things of this world, nor the false teachings of self proclaimed holy men. All who profess the name of Jesus Christ, repent of their sins and are baptized of water and the Holy Ghost shall receive eternity and Life everlasting. Only those who come through the Son shall receive the Father, Only those who are called by the Father shall receive the Son. This is more than what you may take as simple regurgitation of a text you may or may not consider to be false. I would like to have a true conversation, if you are at all interested. If not, Be blessed in the name of Jesus. It is my hope that you take this to heart, even if only for a moment.
@isitokaytoeatquick-wittedb29534 жыл бұрын
@@jeffmorin5867 what blood sacrifice are you talking about, jihad means struggle for the cause of Allah... it could be anything from struggling from poverty, oppression, ailments, the one he meant is struggling in war and spreading Islam, these men came to war fully prepared to die just to spread the message of Islam, no blood sacrifices done as far as everyone's concerned.
@thewonderingworld93014 жыл бұрын
@@jeffmorin5867 how u think early christianity was... ya traveled the world converting and colonizing and killing💀
@pancapana01904 жыл бұрын
@@jeffmorin5867 this person is an example of someone who doesn't know anything about other stuff and blabbering nonsense to justified his words
@PrimusGladius4 жыл бұрын
@@thewonderingworld9301 Early Christianity, for the first few centuries, was spread more through willing conversion rather than coercion. Later on after the Roman emperors legalized the religion and convert to it did coercion and force of arms become more prevalent in spreading the faith.
@Luke_Danger4 жыл бұрын
Sassanid Commander: "TRIAL BY COMBAT, RIGHT NOW!" Muslim Commander: "That's not a trial, *that's an execution*!"
@RAZOR_12244 жыл бұрын
Epic for honor bruh moment.
@puneetmishra47264 жыл бұрын
They didn't had Tyrion Lannister with them.
@muhammadghalibpratama91774 жыл бұрын
@@RAZOR_1224 I wish they add an arab faction to for honor
@randomguy44864 жыл бұрын
FOR HONOR
@EternalVirgin3 жыл бұрын
@@CirosKhan seething Farsī spotted
@amernoori41574 жыл бұрын
I HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR THIS FOR A MILLION YEARS THANKS!
@manjam.tarikh4 жыл бұрын
بالفعل انا أيضاً، ننتظر بشدة
@صالحالعنزي-ن3ح4 жыл бұрын
منجم التاريخ فعلا لازلت انتظر حلقاتهم عن فتح الاندلس و شمال افريقيا
@ضرارابنالازور-ز6د4 жыл бұрын
للاسف تاريخنا العظيم لا يدرس في مدارسنا
@zackosborn17314 жыл бұрын
The Muslim army generals won almost every 1-on-1 engagement. What was their secret/training to accomplish this?
@intanhidayat60644 жыл бұрын
They are know that one of biggest achievement of mankind was to die at battle in the name of God, so that i think - as khalid himself says "you should know that I have come to you with an army of men that love death, as you love life".
@khalidsadiq904 жыл бұрын
Because Muslim commanders were appointed by their sheer talent and were the best worriers in their camps. this is the one reason. there may be other reasons also.
@majerray4 жыл бұрын
Because they became commanders by merit.. most of them were known warriors before being elected by the Kalif and his generals
@zackosborn17314 жыл бұрын
I appreciate the responses, it sounds like the Islamic/Muslim system could be described as highly meritocratic. As with most warrior culture (Vikings or Hun), successful combat and conquest equated to higher social status.
@VIP-ov1qo4 жыл бұрын
It’s mostly due to that they wanted to be killed in battle. How do you fight a enemy that doesn’t fear death?
@napoleonibonaparte71984 жыл бұрын
It’s all fun and games, until your enemy gets your secret killer weapon...
@ukulaylaANDme4 жыл бұрын
Its all fun and games, until winter in Moscow
@BALLARDTWIN4 жыл бұрын
@@ukulaylaANDme Tell that to the mongols lol 😂😂🤣
@kimothyhimmler39214 жыл бұрын
It's all fun and games until the they launched the crusade for the fourth times...
@baskorotejo924 жыл бұрын
yea, you need roof koreans for ultimate defense stats
@muhammadghalibpratama91774 жыл бұрын
It's all fun and games until you hear tree speaking Vietnamese
@noahzuniga4 жыл бұрын
that crossing of the tigris is a logistical masterpiece for the ages
@uvejspreza98794 жыл бұрын
Military commanders of the past: comes forward in a duel putting his life on the line and propably dying in front of his own soldiers. Massive balls. Military "commanders" today: hides in an unknown bunker and sends airstrikes against a bunch of underarmed people thinking he's the real shit. Playstation cowards
@adamsalih28594 жыл бұрын
@Nazrul Islam are you raisul?
@scatterlite22664 жыл бұрын
Remember these are accounts from the victors.
@G30rg314154 жыл бұрын
Yeah it;s called technology,where you can kill as many enemies as you can,while suffering minimal losses,aka war at it's best
@G30rg314154 жыл бұрын
@ Technology*
@G30rg314154 жыл бұрын
@Nazrul Islam As hey always did
@MadMamluk884 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: during the Hijra there was a certain Bedouin named Suraqah (physically ugly by contemporary accounts) who wanted in on some of the reward for capturing the Prophet & Abu Bakr on their flight to Yathrib (Medina). His horse refused to approach the Prophet when he had reached him (the only one of the pursuers to get that close) and the Prophet promised him that one day he would wear the robes of Khosrau, the Shah at the time. Later on when Ctesiphon was captured, then-Caliph Umar sent for the elderly Suraqah and the imperial regalia captured from the Persians and had the Bedouin put them on as fulfillment of the Prophet’s decree.
@mts47594 жыл бұрын
Magnificent
@garretth82244 жыл бұрын
Probably just Islamic propaganda.
@garretth82244 жыл бұрын
@Shawn Lol no. Everyone knows the reason we invaded Iraq was not because of a WMD. I am obviously not talking about the modern era dipshit. Do you really think since the muslims wrote the history of this war, that they wouldn't have lied at all or claimed things that didn't happen?
@arianrezaie47294 жыл бұрын
Can you tell us how many years after this do our sources mention this lie so we can have a good laugh ;)
@garretth82244 жыл бұрын
@@arianrezaie4729 I said probably, i never stated that it was a for sure thing. Your reading skills are pathetic. I believe in logic and facts not myths and legend.
@abdirashidwarsame72844 жыл бұрын
17:50 *It is fascinating to know how 'Salman The Persian' accepted Islam* The first sixteen years of his life were devoted to studying to become a Zoroastrian magus or priest after which he became the guardian of a fire temple , which was a well-respected job. Three years later in 587 he met a Nestorian Christian group and was impressed by them. Against the wishes of his father, he left his family to join them. [10] [ self-published source ] His family imprisoned him afterwards to prevent him but he escaped. [10] He traveled around the Middle East to discuss his ideas with priests, theologians and scholars in his quest for the truth. [10] During his stay in Syria , he heard of Muhammad , whose coming had been predicted by Salman's last Christian teacher on his deathbed. [5] Afterwards and during his journey to the Arabian Peninsula , he was betrayed and sold to a Jew in Medina . After meeting Muhammad, he recognized the signs that the monk had described to him. He converted to Islam and secured his freedom with the help of Muhammad. Source: Wikipedia
@chedabu4 жыл бұрын
Really convenient conversion
@arianrezaie47294 жыл бұрын
Every single modern scholar belives salman is a few people rolled into one secondly taking a look at our sources its clear that early islamic history is not even slightly accurate
@uptheblues18754 жыл бұрын
@@chedabu how is it clear that Islamic sources were not accurate? Any more than the western sources?
@maajidmoha63784 жыл бұрын
Thanks brother I just remembered the story I learnt it in my madarasa (islamic schools) learned a lot of sahabah who's name is salman :)
@Yassinekamp4 жыл бұрын
@Jojo Momo He was captured by bandits who made him into a slave.
@spaghettitime32634 жыл бұрын
This one is great, something about the huge sweeping metropolitan landscape of the multiple interconnected cities of ctessiphon strikes my imagination so hard, it seems so mythical
@jetli20864 жыл бұрын
I even like the name of Persia , Babylon , Ctessiphon. Persians were always advanced people even after their conversation some of the best scientists were Persian
@AsiaMinor122 жыл бұрын
@@jetli2086 the geography allowed them to be advanced. China and India had great innovators because of their geography.
@AhmedMohamed-pg2bb4 жыл бұрын
Imagine what a cavalry charging across a river does to the morale of the other side
@Furioushunter4 жыл бұрын
When Jalinus was killed in single hand combat Epic BrUH Moment
@EternalVirgin4 жыл бұрын
Bruh sfx heard all around Parthia
@vazeerkhan48384 жыл бұрын
History teacher: “can anyone explain how Early Muslim Expansion happend?” Me: (raises hand) 🤚 History teacher: “anyone else besides Kings And Generals subscribers?”
@clifton777lewis64 жыл бұрын
Longest in history
@الياسغالب-خ8ز4 жыл бұрын
@@clifton777lewis6 I mean I don't blame them. Everyone did it at the time why are you shaming arabs alone.
@MuhammadUsman-mi4jk4 жыл бұрын
Black Caesar This isn’t a justification but an explanation. In America we only learn about history that applies to us and the Western Hemisphere. The Arab slave trade didn’t affect America at all while the Atlantic slave trade created the foundations for this country (I’m assuming you’re American too). It’s the same reason why we don’t learn about the Napoleonic Wars or the creation of Germany or Ancient China.
@clifton777lewis64 жыл бұрын
@@الياسغالب-خ8ز not trying to shame anyone excuse me if I came off like that.
@clifton777lewis64 жыл бұрын
@@MuhammadUsman-mi4jk all of it is good to hear History is cool. but your definitely right
@jpstapylton4 жыл бұрын
Thank you guys 💯 🙏🏻
@NeroIML4 жыл бұрын
Sounds like it would be pretty easy to establish a world religion when your commanders all play on god mode.
@crazydinosaur89454 жыл бұрын
the muslims are just players against AI in Total war
@troooooper1004 жыл бұрын
dude literally had dream telling him yes attack from here.
@NeroIML4 жыл бұрын
@@troooooper100 Saad: "How are we going to cross the river? The current is too strong and there's enemies on the other side." Dream: "Just DO IT!" Saad: "k" Persians: "Flee, flee, fleeeee!"
@ahmadrazakhan62744 жыл бұрын
Rather it was the religion which made them potentially successful commanders.
@deqadegan4 жыл бұрын
@@NeroIML it was not a dream, in Islamic sources he prayed to God and his prayer was excepted. As a Muslim I never heard about him dreaming before this.
@awaisahmad38494 жыл бұрын
Khalid died in 642, and his tombstone shows a list of over 50 major battles he won. Not only was he unbeaten in combat, Khalid never even lost a skirmish or a duel! It was common for him and his trusted officers to challenge the commanders of enemy armies to a duel before battle. A win would ruin the morale of the opponents. The best military minds of two great empires couldn’t produce a commander or even a soldier to beat this genius.
@TR_Conqueror4 жыл бұрын
For those do not know, the Tigris river is something like The Missisippi and crossing it with just horses is a pure miracle if you ask me. Is there any more historical detail on the crossing?
@TR_Conqueror4 жыл бұрын
@obsexo zerzual Missisippi is larger but Tigris is one of the major rivers of the world nonetheless.
@edwardmordrake94364 жыл бұрын
This series is extremely intense You guys did an exceptionally amazing work illustrating it!
@eynar146494 жыл бұрын
I have long been waiting for a new episode of Muslim-Sassanid confrontations. Thanks for this priceless content!
@yoloyolo85734 жыл бұрын
16:28 As a half persian,I was surprised you know Farsi really well!! 17:59 I like how you show Iranian style calligraphy when a persian speaking farsi rather than regular arab calligraphy. The video overall is quite good! Very immersive with the language. Perhaps, the video maker is Persian or Arab?
@muharremrevani38954 жыл бұрын
half pers? whats the other half
@th0r_0dinson4 жыл бұрын
The video was contributed by Arabs and Persians.
@PersianHistorian4 жыл бұрын
Persian not Farsi. Or do you say Espanol instead of Spanish?
@te93124 жыл бұрын
@@rahman9749 Yes bro.
@sisyphus44684 жыл бұрын
They search. That's what they're good at. There's nothing to be surprised with.
@aaron2x44 жыл бұрын
I am MUCH EXCITED for this Second Season of this Series!
@tamersamy97514 жыл бұрын
@GoodGirlKate i ee you're interested in the Islamic history are you muslim
@furqanrahman84094 жыл бұрын
the quality of Kings and Generals vids never dissappoint me
@muhammadassadullah62614 жыл бұрын
Nie melayu ke?
@furqanrahman84094 жыл бұрын
@@muhammadassadullah6261 yup indonesia precisely
@mohammadrayhan2944 жыл бұрын
eh ada orang Indonesia juga hehe
@furqanrahman84094 жыл бұрын
@@mohammadrayhan294 ada dong :D
@theonlygoodlookinghabsburg20814 жыл бұрын
Man that Ctesiphon introduction sent chills down my spine.. well done!!
@guilhermehx71594 жыл бұрын
at what moment of the video?
@theonlygoodlookinghabsburg20814 жыл бұрын
@@guilhermehx7159 I'm not rewatching it just to provide a stamp sorry. It comes directly before the siege begins I think.
@keshavsharma86854 жыл бұрын
@@guilhermehx7159 8:26
@Abdulrahman_Hi4 жыл бұрын
Gotta love the Prophet's companions, peace be upon them all.
@sarahhaddad64884 жыл бұрын
Yeah but they killed so many people...how can they be good when they murdered so many?
@Abdulrahman_Hi4 жыл бұрын
@@sarahhaddad6488 How many did they kill? And for what purpose? Shia?
@الياسغالب-خ8ز4 жыл бұрын
@@sarahhaddad6488 they killed them in the name of allah and for islam to spread to the world. You do know before every battle they would offer their enemies 3 choices. Conversion to islam, paying the jizya ( a tax non muslims have to pay living in muslim lands) or death. I don't see anything wrong with this.
@@sarahhaddad6488 You can’t call battle murder, literally the anti-thesis of murder, the fact being defending themselves against aggressors only.
@TIGIY4 жыл бұрын
Displate is so nice! First time i am thankful for an ad! And of course phenomenal video as always!!!
@a.h.tvideomapping42934 жыл бұрын
Everybody Gangsta until the Arabs challenge you to a 1V1
@killme26754 жыл бұрын
Lol
@killme26754 жыл бұрын
@@khalildz1552 Muslim Arabs
@a.h.tvideomapping42934 жыл бұрын
khalil dz Dude im talking about Arabia not the Maghreb
@mohammedaljabit63844 жыл бұрын
@@khalildz1552 they were arabs at that time dude..
@OccupyMars20354 жыл бұрын
1v1 because of the birth of islam and their will to fight, you don’t see that in arabs anymore these days 🤣😂
@wolfofthetwincities57044 жыл бұрын
These documentaries are very well done. I've enjoyed listening to them and learning about some good old history (:
@medzgets34364 жыл бұрын
These muslim conquest series are great, cant wait for the next episode
@فارسبنكلبانАй бұрын
This creation, the structure of the universe, The foods, the tongue that tastes, the teeth that grind, the stomach that digests, the excretion of waste, the oxygen, the lungs, the eyes, the libido and many other things, this does not indicate anything. Are you 100% sure that there is no creator? Rivers and seas and the creatures in them and the rain that sows the earth behind them It is very abundant with a lot of fruits Nothing creates anything Are you 100% sure that there is no creator? Go see what religion commands you to worship. One Creator created everything, not three, not more, not less, and not idols, but one Creator. Go and see for yourself, you will only find one religion, then ask about the evidence of the truth of this religion But I will remind you of something you may have forgotten. And I want you to think about it. You are here in this world against your will. Just think a little bit that you are not here. By your own choice. You are here by choice.Choose to be here.He is one and you will go.. The matter is not easy, the matter is great in this existence, because whoever is able to bring you into this world against your will, after death, will either find you in grace and beauty that you have not seen, or torment and fear. which you have not seen.
@danielconde134 жыл бұрын
Looking forward to reach the invasion of the Iberian Peninsula! This is a subject that, at least here in Portugal, is all so very thinly tought in school: Tariq invaded in 711, the Visigothic Kingdom fell, Reconquista started at Covadonga in 722, the end. There's a lot more to tell about this pivotal event and civilization for the creation of modern Portugal and Spain, so this is (yet another) K&G series I'm absolutely hooked on!!!
@الكابوس5114 жыл бұрын
Tariq did not invade shit, the Umayyads who invaded the Iberian Peninsula, Tariq was just a soldier in the Umayyad Caliphate .
@danielconde134 жыл бұрын
@@الكابوس511 certainly, Tariq acted under Musa's command, who in his turn was a governor of the Califate. But he was the 711 invasion's commander, and this wasn't sanctioned by the Calif Walid himself.
@الكابوس5114 жыл бұрын
@@danielconde13 doesn't matter The important thing is that he is an Umayyad soldier, And he does not do anything except with the permission of Musa ibn Nusayr , The credit goes to the Umayyad Caliphate, not Tariq.
@danielconde134 жыл бұрын
So, Cortez didn't conquered the Aztecs - the credit goes to Castille-Aragon; Vasco da Gama didn't discover the way into India: credit goes to Portugal; Caesar didn't conquer Gaul: after all, it was the Roman Senate. Etc, etc, etc... My friend, we already agreed on facts: he was under Musa's command, who in turn was a governor of the Caliphate. But it's also a fact that Tariq leaded the invasion and the Muslim forces in the Battle of Guadalete, and the initial invasion wasn't even sactioned by the Caliph Walid I. Why does it bother so much to you to state that Tariq invaded the Visigothic Kingdom?
@00Abrams004 жыл бұрын
there was no reconquista wars that lasted for 700 years !! it was revisited term used by latter historians to paint the "other" story & "us" vs "them" point of view ! the real reconquista maybe lasted about 50 years or something. it was border normal expansions, from faction to faction, sometimes the Iberians & Emirate of Cordoba are in Peace & sometimes at war, and after 700 years the total existence of Muslims reduced, then expelled.
@xhuang1014 жыл бұрын
When will they learn? Never do initiate single combat with the Arabs.
@rishi76294 жыл бұрын
**Laughs in Israel**
@Muhammed5524 жыл бұрын
@@rishi7629 israel had the west & usa on it is side btw
@peterongan96554 жыл бұрын
@@Muhammed552 The difference is, the Arabs united in a single country under one leader and in one of the biggest empire the world have ever seen.
@auradzrts6914 жыл бұрын
@GoodGirlKate And never wounded or killed Mongol envoys.
@thehandofjibreel87564 жыл бұрын
@@mtebid5658 Noise making again. it's always someone else's fault as if the Muslims did not get Soviet's support. Based on research, it's obvious that the Israelis were better strategists and tacticians with a more competent command structure that is based on merit.
@aleksandarstojkovic89654 жыл бұрын
You guys get better every new day, just keep doing the good work and lots of support from Serbia !
@dawoodfaqier97624 жыл бұрын
“God is Most Great, I have been given Persia. By God, I can now see the white palace of Madain;” The prophecy that came true before the eyes of his companions.
@ngaefweh57124 жыл бұрын
but now that magnficient city have become a dead city
@dawoodfaqier97624 жыл бұрын
@@ngaefweh5712 Unfortunately
@ngaefweh57124 жыл бұрын
@@dawoodfaqier9762 if middle east achieve peace again, the Iraqi government and maybe the Iranian government must rebuild it again
@dawoodfaqier97624 жыл бұрын
@@ngaefweh5712 Well Iranian government destroyed Iraq at first place. How would they build it?
@ngaefweh57124 жыл бұрын
@@dawoodfaqier9762 i say if one day middle east will achieve again
@alaamansour9614 жыл бұрын
Literally the most valuable Chanel on YT thank you very much for this quality content.
@Pentagathusosaurus4 жыл бұрын
My dude's I always give your videos a thumbs up as soon as I open them, because I know I'm gonna love it.
@TALessman4 жыл бұрын
Awesome video! The amount of detail and your presentation of it, is on par with JJ Norwich's series on Byzantine History (the kind of presentation that pulls the listener right in from the start & keeps your interest because you can imagine it happening around you)
@tamerlane39314 жыл бұрын
i cannot believe you are talking about darrar bin al azwar and kaakaa bin amr......my unknown childhood heroes sadly , most arabs will not recognize these names today
@قصي-ظ9ل4 жыл бұрын
هذوله الخونه الي ما يذكر ابطال هذي الامة
@قصي-ظ9ل4 жыл бұрын
@@Yassinekamp انته عربي و ما تعرف القعقاع
@tamerlane39314 жыл бұрын
My friend even arabia was ethnically mixed with time.... Indian and iranian influence on the east coast, african influence in hijaz and the west. And a great mix in mekka and jeddah due to hajj. All areas are mixed, and many families in lebanon and syria can trace their origin to yemen even before islam, others come from caucasus, central asia, even al andalus when it fell But they all have the same arab culture, with slight differences
@tamerlane39314 жыл бұрын
What you say is true, but also the opposite happened sometimes. The Levant was largely depopulated because of plagues, earthquakes, and wars. Muslims had to settle tribes from arabia to protect the coast. Like the tannoukhis near beirut. Those tribes with time became what we know as the druze, and some of the maronites. So you see the lines are never clear when it comes to origins. However i do agree that the arabic peninsula was less affected then other areas like the levant.
@kagatsuchi4 жыл бұрын
@@abdullahshah9397 Respectfully, that second paragraph is very not true. I speak Arabic fluently and I've read and listened to a lot of lectures about the history of different Islamic states, over the course of the past ten years. Right of the bat, I can tell you that it makes no sense to throw a blanket statement like you did in your WHOLE second paragraph. Is is true for certain parts at certain times. It would have been ALMOST acceptable if you described the umayyad/rashidun period with that statement :) The least you could do to topic so dense is to focus on a region within a reasonable time frame. Do you truly think Arabs just stayed in the peninsula until the 18th century?? heck they were leaving in droves before islam, why stop? Every hundred to two hundred the peninsula becomes unable to provide enough food and water, and a wave migrates. Sometimes they get lucky and their migration becomes an epic with some crazy exaggerations, see the banu hilal migration. This happened before islam (rabeea/taghlib) and after islam. This happened due to factors mostly unchanged by islam, and where changed, they made migration even easier. Example, Abbasid period of weakness, taghlib's banu hamdan, and their ridicicously insane luck of having al mutannabbi be their ministry of propaganda When syria and southern iraq were conquered, there were already many arabs living there. In syria, it was tanukh, lakhm, jutham, al jafna, and others I cant recall who allmigrated out of yemen in waves, all pre islamic and quite old. The same can be said about the arabs of southern iraq (al munther kings, arch rivals of the ghassan kings of damascus (jillaq). Both were of yemeni origin, and both became christians sometime around 300-400 AD. The area between Iraq and syria (an area we call al jazira; the island, as it lies between the tigres and euphrates) was also already heavily arabized when conquered, and were also christian. They were staunchly christian, and refused to convert. Since they were very pro umayyad, they were basically allowed to live like the rest of the arab tribes who adopted islam, under state protection. Heck they even carried crosses and holy relics on their banners when they fought enemies of the umayyads, like when Umair ibn Al habab was killed. See the story about Akhtal's poetry that caused a distant relative of Umair to commit a massacre straight out of the mongol cookbook. Historians claim he killed 23K people (al bishr clan from taghlib bin wael from rabeea, Akhtal's home boys), but realistically , he probably killed 2-3 K people (a huge amount of people when you consider arab tribe numbers at the time). Apparently the poet who instigated this was actually captured by avenging madlads, but when asked he said he just a slave so they let him go. These jazira arabs were from Rabeea, of Najdi origin. They were fought out of Najd because the two biggest clans within rabeea fought an exhaustive civil war (bakr vs taghlib, basoos war). On the other hand, other places like persia proper (Bilad Faris), egypt, nuba, north africa, and iberia did not have arabs living there when they were conquered. Caliphs had to encourage migrations once the intial wave of expansion died. They even allowed some absolutely ridiculous shenanigans to happen like gathering jizya from berber and visigothic MUSLIMS as an additional tax... The one place arabs did not need encouragement was Khorasan. They just kept coming, and where it not for abu muslim al khorasani, they might be speaking arabic today. So why am I going in to this much detail? to show many examples of areas heavily arabized pre islamic expansion, some that only got arabized much later, some which did and where then de-arabized, and some that were never arabized. Northern Jazira was already called diyar bakr / diyar rabeea (diyar = home of) by the time of islam. In addition to clan/tibe migrations, there was an almost non stop steam of traders and merchants (mostly from Hadramut) spreading islam on the indian and malay coast, and very slowly becoming integrated. While theres a sizable population there now of arab ancestry, the numbers were never high enough to arabize the region. How big does the wave have to be? at least as big as the banu hilal I guess, but I doubt they migrated alone. Al Jabarti has good books about egyption mamluk/ottoman periods iirc. They were easy to get into, mostly motivated by stories about Muhammad Ali and da albanian boyz (very underrated character) and to find out more about my own yemeni ancestors (Hamdan) moved from yemen, to the levant, to upper egypt, and then to sudan. Yes upper Egypt was flooded by nomadic arabs (26 clans, each with many subclans) during that early Alawid period, but there was already a big arab population from streams of newer immigrants and decedents of the orginal waves (see history of al fustaat) in egypt. This is such a dense topic and the more you dive and learn the more questions you will have. So it just saddens me to see huuuge oversimplifications. I wrote this quickly, all of the top of my very tired head, before I pass out, so I hope it all makes sense lol. I will try edit it tomorrow if it sounds too stupid.
@Monkey_SK4 жыл бұрын
Will future videos explore any of the reasons for the Sassanid collapse? The rate at which they are losing, the number of defections and the lack of any sense of leadership, appear to point to some major Empire issues.
@kgh81584 жыл бұрын
If you like there is lots of studies on this matter , check out lectures and papers on this . Info given by this channel lacks crucial information and not very accurate . You can check out that at the end of sassanid empire there were internal struggle , generals and nobles not supporting royal command and rivalry sky rocketed . There are vary speculations and theories . Nobles and generals may have not supported yazdgerd because him and his mother were christian !
@kgh81584 жыл бұрын
@Karim Hassan Gemiey very good points . Yet there are many speculations about this era , even recent archeology and studies . Here are some other points: About persia , there are records of taxing that shows in time of arab rule taxes were higher 6 times that shows economic strife might not helped sassanid fall . Lack of leadership and support for yazdgerd because of his christianity might have beed important. khosrow anoushirvan made significant changes in the empire that made it self sufficient and structurally resistance and this alone might have caused independence from central rule in time of arab invasion , as we see persian coins minted as independent lords in many regions in time of arab invasion that shows not a complete conquest but overthrow of a king .
@hhk00724 жыл бұрын
Firstly thank you for the great vid Secondly I see alot of arguments about sources and how real and strong Arabs were ofc mobility maybe were their biggest weapon but ppl forget 2 major points: 1- how Arabs lived at that time and pre Islamic time. Unlike Romans and sassanid, Arabs didn't fight for domination Arabs pretty much since their dawn fought themselves out of necessity for survival, some wars that took years and years started over well of waters over cattles, that hardened them made them war like ppl, it's like u take Sparta and do copy past all over Arabia, we also can say that picture when Khalid told the Romans "I brought you men who love death as you love life". 2- the point of moral, there is story at the battle of alahsab, when the Muslim were 3k vs the Makan alliance numbered as high as 10k to sum it up the prophet had vision and when his companions asked him why do you smile he said don't lose faith I see us standing at the high walls of yemen and holding the riches of Persia so at the point of this vid they already had Yemen so can only imagine what Saad was thinking when he was staring at the city, he most have thought that's all been true and all the struggle they been through wasn't for nothing, no wonder they willing to die in battle. Lastly it's shame that no one took the time and effort to translate most of the Arabic sources to English not just this period but the pre Islamic one too their beliefs, myths, Gods, tribes, wars they fought and history it's really rich and fascinating to read wish I had the time and energy to do that and introduce it to the world
@hhk00724 жыл бұрын
Oh yeah!! Forgive my English it's not that good haha :)
@Siyar6124 жыл бұрын
Good explanation, however, other factors play a role aswell. There is a saying: 'A great empire is not destroyed from without untill it had destroyed itself from within' You cannot understand the Arab victories over the Persians without taking into account the situation within the Persian empire. The empire was severely weakened by the disastarous wars with the Romans. Lost many competent commanders, soldiers, officers and lost a lot of wealth aswell. Population was heavily taxed during the war(602-628) and so the Shah was very unpopular. Khosrow 2 was deposed and killed and a civil war started. The Arabs found out about this and knew the empire was weak. Thats why they striked in the first place. The Arabs just did the knock out blow to the Persian empire, while the Persians themselves weakened themselves by incompetence. Of crouse the brilliance of commanders such as Khalid Ibn Walleed played a role, aswell as superior strategy and morale from Arabs. However, I seriously doubt if the Arabs wouldv'e toppled the Persian empire would it have been at its strongest, without and war with the Romans, and with plently of wealth and popular support.
@Kami-i6k3 жыл бұрын
@@Siyar612 That did happen in Dhi Qar where Bakr ibn Wa’el and some other tribes of NE Arabia stood up to the persians and annihilated them , the entire persian army or at least a large amount of it was sent to destroy Bakr and enslave their women , and the persians failed , there’s also the battle of Saloot in Oman where Azdi Arabs and a small amount of Arabs from Quda’ah ( Tribe name ) approximately 300 pushed the Persians back out of Oman
@peymanmostafaei69634 жыл бұрын
I am glad you guys covered this topic as there are less common knowledge known about the fall of Ctesiphon. However, it would be nice if you could cover the apocalyptic war of 602-628 between the Sassanians and Byzantines which was a prelude to this war. Also, it can be good to start a new series on the rise Abbasids too. As always, Kudos to you guys.
@hossainabir1594 жыл бұрын
There is one about it, you can check this out, although it's a there years old video
@stehfreejesseah78934 жыл бұрын
They did cover many of those battles.
@hossainabir1594 жыл бұрын
@@stehfreejesseah7893 did you watch that video
@hossainabir1594 жыл бұрын
@@stehfreejesseah7893 well they also explained the reason for the battle series but yes they did not show the major and minor battles of that time,but mentioned the overall campaign
@barbiquearea4 жыл бұрын
I think they have already covered some major conflicts between the two powers but that would also be epic.
@sindibad62564 жыл бұрын
Salman(the Persian) is a member of my family. Prophet Mohamed said
@th0r_0dinson4 жыл бұрын
His conversion story is one of my favorites! May Allah be pleased with him ❤
@17-MASY4 жыл бұрын
Peace be upon him
@OccupyMars20354 жыл бұрын
Persians are written in every religion
@Daylon914 жыл бұрын
muhammad also said semen comes from in between the backbone and ribs lmao
@Youtube..Enjoyer4 жыл бұрын
@@Daylon91 thanks for exposing your ignorance. our reproductive organs originate from the space close to the kidneys. and even when the organs later decent to their places, they still receive blood supply from the same space between the backbone and ribs
@mohbou39244 жыл бұрын
Interesting point , Rostom's grand son founded an independent Muslim Kingdom in the west of Algeria called the rostemide
@MT_2824 жыл бұрын
Oh yes i think it was then conquered by the uprising of the fatimds in kabyle
@mohbou39244 жыл бұрын
@@MT_282 indeed the rise of the shiaa Fatimid in the east of algeria among the sanhadja of the houdna the koutam of mount babor and the Kabyle of mount djurdjura signed the end of the kharidji domination of central Maghreb , even if there was some kharidji uprising , ilike the man with a donkey one "thou elhimar" in the chawi region of aouras
@MT_2824 жыл бұрын
@@mohbou3924 were the fatimid armies that invaded west into egypt and so on, algerian?
@mohbou39244 жыл бұрын
@@MT_282 indeed they were ! From those 3 tribes cited above even if the bulk of the force was frome koutama , between 10-20k , and it was followed by a major migration of mainly koutama(and some Kabyle and sanhadja) to Egypt around 100k person , ps from your name I guess your from bordj like me , and it's between bordj Bouira and Béjaïa where those three tribes meet
@MT_2824 жыл бұрын
@@mohbou3924 how did you know, my great great grandad was kicked out of his dads house in bordj than he walked to bejaia as a homeless person and slowly began to make money when he died and his son inherited what he had, my great grandad became a merchant and was quite rich, he also had 4 wives😏🔥
@AmmarTaicho4 жыл бұрын
12:40 No Persia No, never fight a nomad people in an open area. You never learned this lesson.
@SantomPh4 жыл бұрын
The custom back then was to duel your opponent, but the Persians were used to gladiator-style combat with armor and helmets. The Arabs were a blood feud society where duels were common and swordsmanship was a common skill. It would be like a New Yorker challenging a Texan to a shootout- the culture is just too much to contend with
@tasneemayham9744 жыл бұрын
@@gerardb5220 No Gerard! Some people do like to hear about Fares's religion and don't think he should "keep it to himself and his home".
@tasneemayham9744 жыл бұрын
@@gerardb5220 Isn't that typical, Gerard? Why won't a muslim be proud of what their ancestors have worked hard for and conquered. We, in no way, look down on your civilization and neither does our prophet. He even banned us from cursing your gods and/or religions. So, no, it is not "hypocritical"
@tasneemayham9744 жыл бұрын
Fares Ayham is right Gerard! There are only two books we take our facts from and we are not in need to look at the books you mentioned for our complete trust in those two books and the most truthful details they contain.
@Daruliable4 жыл бұрын
Great video as usual, thanks K&G's
@desfighter4 жыл бұрын
I can't wait to see the Battle of Nahavand also known as the Victory of Victories
@alvirarahman15594 жыл бұрын
Guys, remember, this is the SAME Sassanids who were fighting and winning battles against the Byzantines for centuries. The same Persians who were world leaders. Yet they crumbled against the Muslim army. Never ever think yourself as superiors and boast around to those who are less fortunate than you because it is Allah alone who decides winners and losers. If Almighty Allah wants, you will lose, if Allah wants, you will win. Within moments Allah can change you fate. So don't take pride if you are on the front foot now. Assamalu Walaikum my brothers and sisters.
@hectortroy86713 жыл бұрын
So what are you saying? Has Allah been willing to let the US, UK, France, Italy, Israel, Netherlands and now India and China kill tens of millions of Muslims for the past 250 years? Please don't preach such absurdities. Allah doesn't help those who don't help themselves.
@azamanwar74323 жыл бұрын
@@hectortroy8671 India doesn't kill muslim. There is just a elected political party who hate them. But we are still here.
@shudheshvelusamy76444 жыл бұрын
The Muslims OP ability seems to be that none of their commanders can die in single combat.
@Bellasrius4 жыл бұрын
T SA *Muslims*
@tasnubarahman60684 жыл бұрын
@@Bellasrius TVI muslims
@thauthentic3 жыл бұрын
If the Islamic caliphate and expansion were not done, it will have the same fate as Christianity. Teachings of Prophet Muhammad will be taken by Romans or Persians to their advantage and completely change the original message of the religion. This is what happened when Christianity fell in hands of Romans. So Islam established its own powerhouse to spread the message unaltered without giving a chance for Persians and Romans.
@Ani-13-w8d3 ай бұрын
@@thauthentic dude come on, this is history so let us make it unbiased without any religion. Every religion says it's the right one and cites it's own book as proof and says it's ture because the same book says it is. I have nothing against religion but I'm pretty sure it's for the best to study history with no biases. We dont want more genocides and justification of killing people in the name of "Allah" it's very sad to see such comments cuz that's what the Terrorists say in exclusive documentaries too. They dont find it wrong because they think they do it for god. It's really bad. Have a good day.
@thauthentic2 ай бұрын
@@Ani-13-w8d Don't know what to say to you. Yes, everyone says that their religion is the right religion. So it is upto you and me to find the truth based on evidence and thorough study. That is the whole purpose of life, to know the creator and worship him. You are welcome to disagree with this if you have another worldview. Secondly, yes we should take history as history. In earlier times, war were so common among kingdoms be it for land, kingdom, religion, whatever purpose. Nowadays also it is happening. Wars are not a result of religion, rather it is a human nature to fight against each other for any possible reason. It is said in hadith "If any muslim kills an innocent human, it is as if he has killed the entire humanity". And I'm a muslim and I don't know what belief system you follow.
@toobeast6734 жыл бұрын
Been waiting on this for awhile keep up the great work
@hasanabid18364 жыл бұрын
Hey random person scrolling through the comments, have a great day :D
@blessthfallen4 жыл бұрын
You too friend
@Darth_Enigma4 жыл бұрын
Have a great day friend
@renaultr35654 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@jayd.18214 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@MadMamluk884 жыл бұрын
Thank you, random commenter! You too!
@arulshankarum25124 жыл бұрын
The second part was soo late, I have to now re-watch the first part
@tarekeltalawi24144 жыл бұрын
Qa'qa' completed all side missions after saving that guy from drowning
@izz17543 жыл бұрын
100 % synchronized
@Pendekar-11444 жыл бұрын
"I Always happy to see Your New Video Coming Up, Keep Up The Good Work!! *Peace Brother* ✌😊
@TurinTurumba4 жыл бұрын
@GoodGirlKate Good girl, Katie 😁
@KAD1324 жыл бұрын
The quality of Kings and Generals' videos is much improved...... Great work
@Gloria-victrix998574 жыл бұрын
I just wanna say... You guys make amazing content. I love you guys for this, you made my day! 😊
@derekstiles55534 жыл бұрын
Jalinus had all the markings of a great commander. Only the pride of demanding single combat stood in his way.
@قناهمنوعات-ر5ذ4 жыл бұрын
@@gerardb5220 nope
@saifadikara17034 жыл бұрын
You have to make , the Battle Of NAHAWAND dude , that is the one of the great war in that time
@billbir61134 жыл бұрын
Yes
@arwahsapi4 жыл бұрын
Definitely
@MadMamluk884 жыл бұрын
It’s coming for sure, don’t worry
@littlehistorian57514 жыл бұрын
Sassanids - 100,000 Rashiduns-30,000
@احمدعليعباس-ط7ي4 жыл бұрын
Imagine in this battle Arab was 30000 And persian 100000
@nomadhistorian30284 жыл бұрын
This war was all about faith vs another, not a race vs race. Muslims consisted vastly of both Arabs and Persians, along with races though small in numbers.
@00Abrams004 жыл бұрын
Persians will later dominates the bulk of Islamic Culture & politics, and later the Turks.
@17-MASY4 жыл бұрын
@@00Abrams00 Race is not of a great importance,what is important is that they were Muslims You can not choose your race but you can choose your faith.
@دراسةدراسة-ح5ع4 жыл бұрын
@Shadab Khan Mughal Agreed.
@deiov4 жыл бұрын
@@17-MASY !! this. Many of the armies after the conquests were full of muslims regardless of ethnic bounding, God first.
@ademali81993 жыл бұрын
As an Arab it's cool 😎 I respect all race were all Muslims
@athabithaidera4 жыл бұрын
At last... Been waiting for this video for a long time..great video.. Waiting for the sequence
@TheArchaos4 жыл бұрын
Now this Displate sponsor is something I can get behind! Very nice! I'll be taking advantage of that offer!
@Abstractman2244 жыл бұрын
Wait, a season 2?? Yes please and thank you
@thefalcon70214 жыл бұрын
Khalid ibn al waleed Alqa'qa' ibn amr attamimi Sa'ad ibn abi waqas Legends ✌️✌️☝️☝️☪️
@thefalcon70214 жыл бұрын
@M Mehdi yes my son the falcon of Quraish himself ☝️☝️😁
@thefalcon70214 жыл бұрын
@Mehmed Mehdi brother those are companions of the prophet they are the best people
@mihandoostan37554 жыл бұрын
fathers of daesh and al qaeda
@Anonymous-th2rr4 жыл бұрын
@@mihandoostan3755 lmao, the only father for al qaeda and adesh is USA, they created their barbaric ideology and radical ideas, supported with weapons and money, Islam has nothing to do with any of these groups, if anyone has anything to do with them it's your secular and liberal corrupt and hypocrite leaders
@thefalcon70214 жыл бұрын
@Rdb 1480 wow 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Here have a cookie 🍪
@m.thorton93054 жыл бұрын
i like it everytime different arabic tribe leaders of rashidun commanding the army
@СахерСалама4 жыл бұрын
Khalid bin al waleed and saad bin abi waqqas from the same tribe prophet tribe named quraysh but from different branches
@蘭巴拉爾4 жыл бұрын
So glad you have remade this series
@hamdaanchalky77244 жыл бұрын
Was waiting for this for a long time!
@kicokyaw10394 жыл бұрын
I think that the Islamic Conquest proved that tactics/strategy/morale are the most important part and true game-changers of any kind of battle of warfare. You have to remember that the Muslims during this time was essentially still a tribal army. The Eastern Roman Empire, as well as the Sassanids, had superior training, organization, much better arms and armor, and more troops than the Muslims. The only advantage that Muslims had was that their fanatical belief in their religion and more important tactical and strategic geniuses as commanders such as Khalid Ibn Al Walid. With those 2 things, they managed to defeat 2 of the most powerful empires in the world at the time.
@evrensaygn10174 жыл бұрын
Khalid Ibn Al Walid was the luck of Muslim State really. Without a brilliant general and likes of him, maybe we wouldnt have that much of a Muslim population today. History is just weird. It shows that role and impact of these few men changed the life today..
@thehandofjibreel87564 жыл бұрын
The Muslim conquest owes it's victories to the mutual destruction of the Byzantines and the Sassanids. By the time they were done wearing themselves out, only idiots were left in the position of political and military leadership with no champions-- most of the capable men were gone. Contrary to the Islamic sources, the Arabs were knowledgeable and experienced soldiers-- they have been serving as mercenaries to both great empires. The Byzantium was already on its way out already and no longer a great Roman empire due to the activities of the Barbarians and the loss of political unity with the Western Roman hemisphere. Another thing to consider is that the Mohammed of the Quran and Islamic sources is a myth of the Ummayad dynasty. The man who rallied the Arabs under one banner was an enlightened prince of Arab origin familiar with Sassanid politics. He was later given the title Mohammed-- the exalted one. He was an ardent follower of a heretic Jewish sect. His name is Iyas ibn Qabisah.
@DM-dy9bq4 жыл бұрын
@@thehandofjibreel8756 can i get the sources?
@Omegaeon14 жыл бұрын
The Hand Of Jibreel If each time you fill stronger armies and still lose to fewer numbers. Then sorry. Numbers don’t make victories.
@senpainoticeme96754 жыл бұрын
@@Omegaeon1 quality also plays a lot in that case though. I mean the Islamic expansion have their best quality armies facing off against mostly levied troops. And if the Arab army was indeed largely tribal in nature, then it is no surprise (sure by hindsight proven by various Turkic tribes and the Mongols) they overwhelmed both Sedentary empires by bringing high quality and motivated troops (not to mention the religious zeal).
@barryboushehri17072 жыл бұрын
Amazing video, yet I was so sadden when Muslim army captured magnificent city of Ctesiphon.
@ahzam28624 жыл бұрын
Please a documentary on beloved Prophet's military and political campaign. There are lot of resources and detail battles of Badr, ohud, khandaq, Tabuk and so on
@majerray4 жыл бұрын
These battle will be hard to cover because they will spark too many arguments (religious arguments).. And most sources of these battle are one sided and will be hard to present realistically and objectively without falling to a specific narrative
@user-ku2bm6kw2k4 жыл бұрын
Love this channel thank you so much plenty of history and extremely well animated
@NoName-do1rm3 жыл бұрын
Great Chanel! History Marche and Kings and Generals are one of my best chanels. Please complete this series and if you can kindly make a video on Battle of Firaz! Most importantly, keep up the Great work!
@megood15824 жыл бұрын
Enemy : you f ing noob, go one by one Arab : ez
@kashifuddinahmed83834 жыл бұрын
Alright I'm gonna end this man's whole carrier.
@vasiqriaz33184 жыл бұрын
Please make a video on Battle of Nahawand which is called the "victory of victory" ...Conquest of Ctesiphon was followed by Nahavand which completely routed Sassinids forever. Numan Bin Muqarrin and Tulaiha Bin Khuwaylid were the heroes!
@adityanugroho5284 жыл бұрын
I cried at Salman Al Farsi part.. what a journey for him..
@khosrowsalour45814 жыл бұрын
He betrayed his people
@afifihasan21344 жыл бұрын
Khosrow Salour shut up pagan majoosi. Go worship fire. Salman Al Farisi is in heaven while majoosi persian king is in hellfire
@asomebody34484 жыл бұрын
@@khosrowsalour4581 he preferred afterlife over his people. Good for him
@ishakboudje61063 жыл бұрын
Salman was a soldier in Islamic army and his loyalty was for Islam
@Mirnaja14214 жыл бұрын
I love your channels and video! You have a good narrator voice and posted interesting topic very frequent. Keep your good work
@arabianmapper66564 жыл бұрын
Great video I was waiting for it 😊❤
@nmoh1234 жыл бұрын
Any one else addicted to this channel. Got the family to subscribe to this channel 🙌
@madhurawat1554 жыл бұрын
I am unable to understand how Arabs were able to defeat Sassanians time after time, while Arab cavalry was undoubtedly excellent, they couldn't have been better than Persian Cataphracts, and it was cavalry which played the decisive role back then.
@a.h.tvideomapping42934 жыл бұрын
Hdye Hdhde yeah back then morale was everything and Islam and Proper Jihad essentially gave the warriors a reservation in Heaven as long as they fight for god so dying wasn’t some horrifying truth, it was a promotion
@armzngunz4 жыл бұрын
@@a.h.tvideomapping4293 like the vikings
@VIP-ov1qo4 жыл бұрын
Basically it was WIN-WIN situation for muslim soldiers. You die you go to heaven, or win.
@Ilamarea4 жыл бұрын
When you are used to doing battles that always ended with a rout it becomes hard to figure out on the spot how to face extremist zealots on par with modern terrorists just willing to fall on your sword just to stab you in the guts. Same thing happened to the Aztecs, they were used to a mode of warfare that revolved around capturing their enemies alive for sacrifice and had no idea how to react when a superior enemy just slaughtered everyone.
@jetli20864 жыл бұрын
Hdye Hdhde one believed in Allah and the other worshipped fire 🔥
@Sicovico4 жыл бұрын
BIG LIKE AND LOVE BEFORE WATCHING .. THANKS FOR YOUR HARD WORK .. LOVE AND GREETINGS FROM MOROCCO 🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦 ❤
@Uthmannie4 жыл бұрын
simply Amazing! Cant wait for the episodes to come!
@HijikataToshizo864 жыл бұрын
I love these videos. This KZbin channel is 🔥
@mal47972 жыл бұрын
The victory of the arabs gives me goosebumps so many miracles happened.
@Gadanfer2 жыл бұрын
Maybe it's meant to be, i mean there is 2 billion muslims right?
@onlinegladiator58884 жыл бұрын
I love old history, it seems so golden and ancient. I would love to live back in BC, where religious events happened at the highest amount.
@LevelUpGaming934 жыл бұрын
I was hoping for an hour long episode just like first one. But thank you guys so much. Really enjoy this than watching a movie.
@mohammedabdallah72104 жыл бұрын
A great video like always. Your efforts are appreciated guys.
@Planet_Footy4 жыл бұрын
My favourite KZbin channel. Keep up the good work!