Easy Blender Trick 🔥

[@MalikoseStudio]

I have a second method using the spin tool. This second method consists of fewer polygons. I hope you will enjoy it. your Malikose. kzbin.info-DN0egdpXt8

[@Idkkkk401]

Which version is this?

[@MalikoseStudio]

@@Idkkkk401 Blender 3.4

[@gamheroes]

thanks for sharing

[@reyonedragongamer]

Where your institution i am studying 😅 where are you from

[@MalikoseStudio]

@@reyonedragongamer Home office bro.

[@PayxiGandia]

the first method is totally fine

[@DannyEastes]

Quicker and simpler too lmao

[@MipCat]

No, it is not, curves provide a better shape and actually add more detail. It is just an example

[@PayxiGandia]

@@MipCat the second method can be also useful, my point is that the first method is fine xD

[@MipCat]

@PayxiGandia, yes you're right. I said that in this example both of them are totally fine 😁

[@bryansaira2803]

In practice box modelling should be the first method everyone learns after all you'll be converting curves to quads anyway.

[@homborgor]

The first method is actually the better one imo, not only is it a lot quicker but you can play with your mesh a lot more to get it looking nicer

[@getjarred3420]

Agreed. Also a lot lower poly count and easier to work with imo

[@davidj.3897]

Also the first method makes the object solid, second has overlapping lines but it's not actually closed

[@Shorty3D]

True you just add shade smooth to it aswell and its pretty much the same oly with less verticies

[@bj124u14]

​@@davidj.3897 Then simply delete the face on top...?

[@bbengo]

Came here to say this 👌🏽

[@mintycandyyumyum]

To those learning, both methods here work fine. This moreso shows that Blender has very many tools to achieve what you're aiming for, and it's good to know all these tips and tricks and it's up to you how you want to utilize them.

[@Sir_Catfish]

The first method is better. It might not look as detailed but the second one has alot of geometry meaning it will take more power

[@cburn-YT]

if you're referring to using this in real time applications, yes if you were to JUST take the object and put it in unreal or unity thats technically a bad idea, however substance painter wants a higher poly mesh to bake details with, you make your texture, export it, THEN you make an optimized version without destroying your UV's, that being said, if you're using this in a render environment, it does not matter, higher quality mesh is preferred for several reasons

[@Kraypus]

​@@cburn-YTExactly, people are so braindead refusing to even look into other methods and processes before commenting, which leaves bad advice for the beginners that watch this

[@konstantinmakarenkov8466]

Он просто добавил больше точек. Ничто в этой жизни не мешало добиться абсолютно того же результата первым способом. Просто в начальный цилиндр добавить большее число граней и экструдировать собирался.

[@digicell2882]

better for animation

[@doodledoocg]

Using a Bezier curve with 3 points, then adding a screw modifier is the only acceptable option

[@tasinirin5747]

It was actually good.

[@shlokbhakta2893]

2nd seems to have more geometry, both are fine, depends on the LOD required

[@Techamterr]

Que es LOD?

[@shlokbhakta2893]

@@Techamterr LOD = level of detail In video games when things are far away they have less polygons so the game doesn’t have to work as hard to render Basically when close, polygon high. When things far, polygon low! So here you can make multiple versions and give them different polygon to use as LOD

[@Techamterr]

@@shlokbhakta2893 thank you

[@Watchmeplayn]

Wow that technique is amazing

[@mrcricket275]

I still do believe that a subdivided plane would be much easier, and a nicer result

[@CMXCX]

Mah channal😍 You are an incredible animator🔥💜, and your editing skills are truly remarkable. Your ability to take a simple animation and transform it into something truly awe-inspiring is astonishing. Your attention to detail is remarkable, and you are able to take even the most basic of animations and turn them into captivating visual masterpieces💥. Your ability to use color, shading, and other visual elements to bring your work to life is unparalleled. You have an eye for the perfect aesthetic and your passion for the work is undeniable. Your animation editing is truly awesome and cool. Lots of love 💜💜💜💜.

[@shanecasbarian]

​@@CMXCX wromg video bot

[@charchar4957]

Would love to see more videos like this. Bit more of a slower breakdown for the beginners

[@-The_Architect-]

i love how you went into detail with the curve version when all you had to do was take 2 seconds longer on the first for a better quicker result.

[@ManarNihonKankou]

Wow 🤩

[@pixeldods]

There's no wrong or correct way to model things, it mostly depends on what you're using it for, when you're just rendering a sculpted dude then sculpt. If you're planning to animate it then retopologize it. And besides just use the screw modifier so that it doesn't use up to much cpu and gpu, and so that it's undoable

[@Alex-pq1sj]

except you also have to retopologize if you're rendering a textured dude because you'll need proper UV maps.

[@emackenzie]

​@@Alex-pq1sj no you don't! If you're rendering a sculpt you can just do texture paint (Blender) or polypaint (ZBrush). It's only if _want_ baked texture maps when you need to retopologize and do UVs.

[@emackenzie]

+I believe you can even bring vertex paint into an engine like Unreal but then it's up to if you need baked lighting and if your computer is beefy enough to handle all those polygons in there. But if you're just trying to render a sculpt and not animate it or take it anywhere it isn't inherently necessary to retopologize _or_ do UV mapping for texture maps

[@mkonlp4197]

Thats magic for me (begginer)

[@gamheroes]

I like that

[@Maebbie]

i was like wtf, but the curve tool approach is actually pretty good

[@Rudrraaa]

Dude is a genius 😎😅

[@achmadiqbal80]

I prefer the 1st one

[@3dpeterartmileo296]

Ty for show me this method

[@nythree9476]

Screw modifier: - "I am joke for you?"

[@lawnside82]

Mirror modifier has entered the chat…

[@overseastom]

I'm used to 3DS Max - does Blender not have the equivalent of a Lathe modifier for splines? I also wonder if they have lofting tools too...

[@alanlavery]

@@overseastom The screw modifier is the lathe equivalent

[@overseastom]

@@alanlavery brilliant, thanks mate. Surely that's the fastest way to make this piece then, no? Edit: sorry, I just re-read the top level comment, doh! Literally saying the equivalent of "just use screw!"

[@secondgroup5155]

​@@overseastom 😮

[@royanhilmy5446]

nice one

[@izthewiz8231]

ayyyooo. i just started using blender to make my own logos, visuals, etc. and i find these so satisfying 🤩

[@Kaizaruu]

i just started, but im too lazy bcuz the tools are so complicated

[@izthewiz8231]

@@Kaizaruu i feel you. thats why i just watch tutorial videos and do them over and over until i understand how to navigate on my own!

[@hadherramadhanmohammed3699]

fantastic 🎉

[@dominik7206]

The first method is acceptable as well and in both cases the model doesn't have a volume and is thus not applicable as representing a transparent glass, missing the possibility for correct refraction. You either should use a boolean operation to "empty" the glass body inside or create an actual hull with a thickness using splines

[@Legen_predator4]

INCREDIBLE!!!

[@lomborg4876]

Use the screw, solidify, bevel and subdivide (If necessary) modifiers, if you want to show off

[@charnobul]

Woooow really nice

[@franciscocasillas6562]

This is insane lol

[@DARK____SIDE]

logical and smarter❤❤❤❤

[@Subject97]

These are two ways of modelling something, it's like saying that when making a character you MUST NEVER use poly modelling because you can sculpt. Everybody uses different methods (and also after sculpting there is retopology but it's an example). Also, in the second method when converting the curve to mesh there were a lot of vertices. I'm not saying that it's bad because maybe it's for a realistic render, but you really shouldn't subdivide a mesh with that resolution that many times. If you want the "spin" to produce a better resolution mesh you should increase the "steps" parameter (top left) to something like 32 or even 64 and it would look even better than the subdivision (because subdivision will make the model smaller in diameter)

[@AkariEnderwolf]

I never sculpt, for example, because I specifically aim for a ps1 style aesthetic.

[@Jacob-or7wy]

Both methods are good

[@OrangeJani]

When u realize if u subdivide the first method it will look the same 💀

[@MalikoseStudio]

Check out this video, I hope you will like it. kzbin.info-DN0egdpXt8

[@bmomosaik]

@@MalikoseStudio its the same outcome you trash can. been a PROFESSIONAL maya 3dsmax mudbox zbrush Rino and Softimag user for over 20 years... btcha...

[@hrantsafaryan7798]

it will look better than second one

[@N_Timer1]

Finally thanks 🙏

[@QuoteoftheDay-q7r]

Damn, usually it's Photoshop short tutor now we have a blender short tutor? Noce

[@debugempty]

Except it's a bad one because the first method is better in several ways

[@garebizarre4446]

Yeahh, i think soo That's rare

[@woxiam9004]

​@@garebizarre4446 like for anti lgbt)

[@anonymousme3571]

​@@debugemptywell dang, how so? Im completely new.

[@vemo-va8125]

Good job

[@izmi2938]

Man I wish KZbin can make playlist for shorts

[@Ashwin_1198]

You can save it in Google notes tho...if you're on Android

[@CDallas]

You can, go to history, open the wanted video and add to playlist.

[@andranz9763]

Just enter to the audio, there's an option to save ;)

[@izmi2938]

@@CDallas I mean by just in the shorts itself without quit shorts mode

[@SandeepSinghMango]

Also if you're on desktop you can change in the url "shorts" to "watch" and get the normal UI

[@TheFinalGuidance191]

Wow, excellent method

[@NuhUhUhBuddy]

Good job but if you spend more time the 1st method can be perfectly fine too i made a really good one with it

[@sillygoofyaudrei]

It looks very cool

[@bobbyhenshall7464]

I don't think there is a wrong way, everyone has their own method of doing things. Besides, I prefer the circle or cylinder extrude and scale method. It's simple and gets the job done. I can keep the poly count lower and add a subdivision modifier later.

[@goof.7874]

Pls tell me how to extrude a bezier circle after rotating it a bit on y -axis.

[@kalpeshbhalerao9403]

Awesome

[@nikodga5577]

Congrats!, You made a pretty hard to model (or modify) mesh, subdivision would work so much better

[@Furry_Cultist]

I do not understand. Explain, bitte

[@nikodga5577]

@@Furry_Cultist so, if you traced the shape of the glass in a very low vertex count, and then used the subdivision modifier, you can adjust the vertices of a very simple mesh to adjust it so when you are viewing the effect, it looks like desired while at the same time, having the ability to edit the mesh easily due to the low poly count. The method showcased gives you an instant and accurate model, but rather useless if you want to do anything with it besides just looking at it

[@universaltoons]

​@@nikodga5577he could've reduced the curve resolution from its properties

[@wothisthamzin]

I need to learn Blender 😭

[@karine338]

Wow❤❤

[@Tyreek1]

Me just trying to find out how to add an image to blender Update: I figured out how to add an image to blender

[@klim_creator]

add > reference > background image

[@Tyreek1]

@@klim_creator thanks I actually didn’t know how to add one

[@yurishakalov6213]

also Blender has a default addon "add image as mesh" or something like that, it allows to add pictures as planes!

[@bruhnah4life]

Also you can just drag and drop it

[@grub-chan9654]

@@Tyreek1 i think you can just paste it by ucing ctrl + c to copy and ctrl + v to paste

[@yashgarg1047]

Helped

[@mikejones-vd3fg]

AWESOME

[@goc19777]

Wow

[@dropperplay2045]

The dude explained in 1 minute more than the rest in 50 minutes🍷🗿

[@zZz-lb6ry]

this is so cool!

[@sk8soxerr]

Your tutorial is good, but if you're concerned about polycount, the first step is the efficient way. The 2nd method eats a lot of polygons for just a piece of drinking glass.

[@kelz89]

Can't polygons be reduced?

[@muhammadarkan4432]

i still prefer the first method

[@UoTin-er6lb]

good👍

[@Святославкусь]

Блендер самое классное приложение ❤

[@Aymenplusplus]

I'm addicted to this,

[@thepuppyoflight]

Song please??

[@MalikoseStudio]

Cyberpunk Synthwave - Absynth // Royalty

[@r1zz1x]

Amazing method, thanks man 💯

[@cristopheraguilar6726]

Too much polygons

[@MalikoseStudio]

You can use the "Decimate Modifier" to reduce the number of the polygons.

[@universaltoons]

​@@MalikoseStudioYou can also reduce the resolution of the curve

[@jollyjoan]

​@@MalikoseStudioin that case just use the first method.

[@gamebox9067]

@@MalikoseStudio so i take more time using the second method to then end up with more polygons so i have to use the decimate modifier to only end up with less polygons and bad geometry, the first method combined with the bevel tool is the correct way and faster

[@azuflute3993]

​@@MalikoseStudio imagine using decimate

[@jorjgio4639]

Cool!!!!!

[@he17676]

👍

[@colourbrains_srinivasb]

👏👏👌

[@nightmare_68]

Don't be shy, show us your poly count

[@RLCDECALS]

Nah youre crazy for this 💀💀💀💀😭

[@visionaryprem]

Useful information

[@Erebus_official]

My laptop would explode 💀

[@thecyclopsofrainbowleaf]

Thank u for sharing it looks accurate

[@alfasnilek]

Metod 2 = rip graphic card

[@TripleGlanceLA]

nice!

[@Joel-xu2sn]

Bevel: I am a joke to you?

[@KidaleSmith]

I just like the instrumental

[@awrbro3568]

Lol ,The second one takes more time ..

[@delfinal7560]

Incredible

[@gaieow282]

кто-то:не бывает лучших реков! реки по блендеру:вэй кап ту риалити

[@razichulliyodeofficial4132]

Nice

[@islam8542]

🔥🔥🔥🔥

[@david_ddr2ff]

😮👏👏

[@BlenderRookie]

The best method is whichever workflow is the most efficient for the creator. Always be doubtful of anyone who claims to know the best way something should be done.

[@Unlimited-2004]

WHAT!?!?! thank you for the tips

[@andrzejk6868]

Very helpful 🥹

[@bouncy_broccoli]

Wow, I just tried this trick and now I'm a blender magician. I'm already getting requests for smoothie shows in Las Vegas!

[@VortexGamer81]

WoW

[@behzodboy]

🎉❤

[@Leticia-yb3uq]

Orra, muito melhor!! 😍😍😍 Obrigada! 💞

[@mini_star_uz]

❤❤❤❤❤

[@FASmedia700]

🔥

[@PeterSvP]

You can as well use a modifier for the spinning

[@Solomonwo]

Hmm good

[@Veravkraaa]

❤❤

[@agyab3d]

hmm that's cool trick, never thought of that 👍

[@GAMINGWITHSHUVOTOP]

😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮❤❤❤❤

[@mechamicro]

That is pro

[@designer_Alaa_Awedallah]

good

[@PhoenixVids123]

Just use the screw modifyer instead of spin, you can then control certain aspects in the modifyer rather than just spinning it

[@sauravpro4788]

Me as a newbie Both both are good

[@amenadiel216]

thx man

[@yokanshree4621]

Amazing I didn't know u could do that

[@olaniyivictor6154]

Great

[@byy0ne]

Amazing

[@The-Survivalist1]

Smack a shade smooth on the first one and you are good!

[@liljagey]

First method works fine just use a subdivision and keep sharp lines in the bottom of the glass.

[@Zehaha2]

The first method is completely viable though and usually faster with less polygons, but they both have their place