ECG Rhythms for self-assessment: Test ECG Interpretation Skills

An excellent video to test your ECG Rhythm interpretation skills. This video gives you a collection of about 20 back-to-back ECG Rhythms. In each ECG strip, you are given 15 seconds for interpretation. Test yourself and your colleagues. You may give your score in the comments section.
18 and above correct answers: You are a STAR
14 - 17 correct answers: You are GOOD
13 and less correct answers: You need to come again for re-test after refreshing your ECG knowledge.
P.S: This video only includes ECG Rhythms and not Ischemia-related ECGs.
Credits: ECG Strips downloaded from
www.skillstat....
________________________________________________________
For useful medical posts, exam tips, and other medical pearls, visit our site:
medigemz.com/
Are you looking for exam orientation tips, mock tests, or other exam related tips? Please visit:
medexamin.com/
Please visit and subscribe to our KZbin channel for the latest videos:
www.youtube.com/ @Last Second Medicine
Explore our other medical KZbin channel as well:
/ @medexamin
Visit us on Facebook: / lastsecondmedicine
Disclaimer:
Medical videos on our channel are intended for educational purposes. These are published exclusively for medical students. Students are encouraged to verify information through the reading of standard textbooks.
🤝 Please comment below, about any new information on this topic.🤝
______________________________________________________________________
#ECG_Test #ECG_Interpretation

[@tracelawson1367]

0:18 sinus Bradycardia 0:39 junctional rhythm 1:00 sinus rhythm 1:20 sinus arrhythmia 1:42 wandering pacemaker 2:02 sinus tachycardia 2:24 atrial flutter 2:44 accelerated junctional rhythm 3:05 junctional tachycardia 3:25 atrial fibrillation 3:48 idioventricular rhythm 4:08 accelerated idioventricular rhythm 4:31 second degree AV block Mobitz type 1 / wenckebach 4:52 SVT 5:11 first degree AV block 5:32 second degree AV block mobitz type 2 5:53 PVC 6:14 Third degree AV block 6:35 Ventricular Tachycardia 6:57 PAC 7:17 Atrial pacing 7:40 PJC 7:59 paced ventricles 8:20 VFIB

[@PracticalMedicine]

Thanks

[@tracelawson1367]

@@PracticalMedicineNp, Did it to cheat on a test. Didn’t really work out 💀

[@lkw5699]

That wandering pacemaker gets me everytime

[@doris7653]

Me too

[@kalenclayton]

ECG test in a few days. This just helped me identify a few rhythms that I need a little more work on. Thank you!

[@valentinocaine2294]

The rhythm at 6:31 shows Normal Sinus Rhythm, not a PAC as listed. It would be an irregular rhythm.

[@hh-de6hc]

yeah

[@rosalietumacder1993]

agree

[@RBTrujillo1]

agree

[@sometimesoonfan]

Dudeeee! That was racking my brain!

[@ronthemogul]

6:57 you mean

[@chelsea9588]

This is literally the perfect review before ACLS or a rhythm exam for work! Thanks!

[@perveennoor372]

Saw this right before exams! Thanks a ton!

[@premarawat7919]

I cnat believe that koi aise bhi padha skta hai ❤️

[@joat9278]

This was excellent ! I passed my test with it❤ thank you!!

[@ashwinkalaiselvan6358]

Hats off to you, who made this video

[@5avilajohn]

Atrial Flutter actually has a fast HR typically around 300

[@brandionatuesday9411]

No…at that point 300 bpm it would be SVT. You can have a rate of less than 100 with a rhythm of a flutter.

[@lebparr6139]

That was fun!

[@Papinca]

Hello, We are working hard to develop competitive materials. I hope this is of use. TeachMeAandP. We would appreciate your support either on youtube or Patreon. www.patreon.com/TeachMeAandP kzbin.info/door/ZYQgK2AKo9dwIE7xDe0p8A

[@eljosepr10]

This beat is fire !!! Helped with my studying !!

[@jab376]

Million thanks..

[@dr.omarrashwan]

In 3:00 , it's VT not junctional tachycardia....junctional tachycardia is the same as SVT.....compare between both at 3:00 & 4:50 ...they are different

[@karentomas9442]

super helpful practice video! thanks!

[@PoopScooper10000]

Agreed! Thought I was crazy for a second

[@shaneb.3982]

Thanks for the quick refresher.

[@drgadham]

Good presentation 👍

[@drgadham]

Very good practice presentation 👌

[@rajanjacob2577]

Excellent

[@annaciesielska4463]

that's great reviewing, thank you so much ❤

[@misbahkachchi2236]

I love how they ended the video with Ventricular Fibrillation 😄

[@taliarose3166]

Should’ve ended with asystole 😂

[@francesg3926]

thank you

[@Cacio99]

I think that PAC rhythms (at 6:55) isn't correct but i'm probably wrong

[@PracticalMedicine]

Thanks for pointing out the error

[@4m4lmini4wdhobbyshop7]

Yup...there is no ectopic beat at all

[@simplyash4165]

I agree, it's a normal sinus rhythm

[@misbahkachchi2236]

How to identify ectopic beat on ecg?

[@RichKennedyIII]

It’s not a pac but the PRI is still small...

[@annural_whitner]

thank you!!

[@AlexD-wi8lo]

Thank you for this!

[@iy2608]

Thanks you so much

[@jenniferjojotms3821]

Thank you so much!!!

[@azitagalinimoghaddam2095]

great

[@saranyabathey4851]

Video was very helpful

[@Freshknight7]

These were great thanks!

[@hapax87]

It would be nice if there were a brief intro to explain how to use this test practice.

[@mr.x1363]

Thanks 🙏

[@drgadham]

VERY GOOD

[@dr.deekshamedlife7488]

Excellent !!

[@gborowme]

Thank you ☺️

[@dokotolobingoma7953]

Beautiful video

[@whytejune207]

Very very helpful

[@helenyourlo581]

For the ECG labelled sinus arrhythmia, I think it may be wandering atrial pacemaker instead given that the p waves have different morphologies.

[@bettysmith4527]

That is due to artifact, and is not a change in morphology. Change in morphology would include inverted, or lacking all together, as well as a change in shape. In order to have a wondering atrial pacemaker you need at least three different morphologies.

[@tornikekharbedia8650]

@@bettysmith4527 There are 3 different morphologies..

[@valentinocaine2294]

Look at the irregularity though. Sinus arrhythmia changes on breathing. A WAP will have different P wave morphologies, however, the overall rhythm should be regular if not nearly regular.

[@tahmeedahnaf5065]

that background music!

[@PracticalMedicine]

What about it! Good, bad ...?

[@tahmeedahnaf5065]

Good man.. 😀..kind of mesmerising....where did you get it?

[@candyxoxo506]

I got 2 wrong. Junctional tach and pjc . I know better now thanks to this vid!🙂

[@PracticalMedicine]

Thank you for appreciation

[@ebuseman6]

Junctional tach seemed more like svt to me due to the heart rate

[@vahidmohamadi5884]

amazing

[@sebastienkutusova9824]

great it help me very much

[@Flumazenil]

Nice video. Get rid of the creepy music and put the sound of the monitor on instead.

[@blooddrunk4957]

Can someone explain to me how 6:57 is PAC? I'm not taking a class or anything, this is just a reoccurring hyperfixation of mine. But the only thing I can see is the different morphology of some p waves. I thought PAC's usually led to an irregular rate? Thanks in advance!

[@iganpparamarta8813]

It's definitely an error.

[@dandreaevanswarner4845]

Thankkk youuuu 🥰

[@breadfan9]

The atrial contraction was wrong. That was just a sinus rh

[@user-hv3pn7dj6g]

Sinus with PAC is tough

[@iganpparamarta8813]

3:00 I immediately guessed VTach lol, when I saw the answer there is actually tiny non sinus Ps very close to QRS.

[@melvinleong3731]

can anyone tell me which one is the most common for people

[@Anne-kg7ee]

😍😍😍😍😍🔥🔥🔥🔥👏👏👏👏

[@farzane2606]

Thank you so much. It was very helpful

[@kyleleggat175]

New to this

[@doris7653]

Me too

[@dylanfitch2997]

I have to remember wide qrs with no p wave or atrial origin is idoventricular

[@jadensilva2227]

Where is the PAC at 7:02?

[@abdulchaba3188]

Sir after importing data to SPSS from Kobo toolbox, the data type is automatically left as string (even those that should be numerical) and measure is automatically left as Nominal (including those that should be scale or ordinal). Is there a way to import so that it is imported the correct way or I must always edit manually after importing it? Thanks sir.

[@jocelynjohnson5065]

Have exam in a few days feeling overwhelmed trying to remember these strips for my exam any hints?

[@4emperor4]

6:50 is SR not PAC been knocking me head out , rest was very usefull

[@NJFireBuff]

6:50 where the hell do you see a pac

[@PracticalMedicine]

Lol. You're Right. It is difficult to see.

[@Untamed_ayla]

LOL I was just saying this outloud myself . I BARELY see it. I thought it was NSR.

[@X1OAFREED0M]

3:05 don't junctional rhythms have narrow QRS complexes? This looks more like vtach since the QRS is wide

[@iganpparamarta8813]

Possibly from an aberrant conduction, my guess was VTach too = regular wide QRS tachy + taller left ear. If you look closely there are small P waves very close to QRS complex, as explained by dr.Ken Grauer those Ps can't be sinus.

[@Zizuthecreatorlamarwest]

Plz add what leads these are, bc i dont know if it's lead avf ,II, or avr

[@PracticalMedicine]

Rhythm lead - II

[@Zizuthecreatorlamarwest]

@@PracticalMedicine what about the sinus arrythmia one? that did not look like lead II

[@samuel.tatchim]

Having issues with jonctional rhythms 😭

[@merboyontiveros5297]

Any tips on retaining all this info

[@PracticalMedicine]

Strengthen the basics of ECG interpretation.

[@delilah8482]

i'm a first year medical student and this does not look like the ones in the book.... welp

[@lkw5699]

No Torsades

[@cliftonsuber]

Am i the only one who didnt see any PAC's

[@strawberrylala5529]

♥️

[@alice010185]

I appreciate you all providing educational content however whoever made this video has no business making an EKG video, there are mistakes and incorrect terminology throughout. At 6:55 it says "Premature atrial rhythm" which they then abbreviated "PAC" which actually stand for premature atrial contraction. Also that PR does not look short but it's also hard to tell because it's not on an EKG background (like with squares). Even if the PR is normal the p wave morphology is normal except in one spot. Also at 3:05 that's too wide to be junctional. AT 5:56 that's SR with PVC's NOT "premature ventricular rhythm" which isn't even really a correct term. And again it has PVC next to it which stand for premature ventricular contraction NOT what they specified. 7:03 looks like there's a pacer spike in front of the QRS, obviously there isn't because the complex isn't wide however whoever drew that picture misrepresents it a little.

[@anandrahangdale5214]

Alice, yo must have read How to win friends and influence people!

[@shaneb.3982]

Make you should make a better video know it all. People like you really irritate me.

[@eb5671]

@@anandrahangdale5214 irrelevant

[@eb5671]

@@shaneb.3982 Have fun learning the wrong material and thinking you're smart!

[@bettysmith4527]

Alice looks like YOU have more studying to do dear! Junctional rhythms can in fact be wide if you have aberrant conduction either because the patient has an underlying bundle branch block, or because of slower conduction secondary to a faster rate. In 7:03 that is an ATRIAL PACEMAKER (hence the pacer spike you see before the P wave), as identified in the video, which WOULD NOT cause widening of the QRS since the impulse would be traveling down the atria and into the AV junction normally. READ UP BEFORE YOU INSULT THE WORK OF OTHERS, it is you who needs to study!! I will give you your first complaint about the PAC, there was no PAC in that running strip, so yes they screwed up that one.