You're helping me big time, Mr. Harris. If I could, I would burn down the subscribe and like button because you said so. Godspeed!
@tomkrys33313 жыл бұрын
Well explained, fantastic detail, brilliant video as always. I just get this topic now. Thanks a hell of a lot man, you're a fantastic teacher!!!
@AlleryChemistry3 жыл бұрын
Glad it helped!
@mhd84993 жыл бұрын
An absolute lifesaver Mr. Harris! You’re a legend!
@miranabbas674 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU SO MUCH YOU ARE THE BEST
@AlleryChemistry4 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@miranabbas674 жыл бұрын
@@AlleryChemistry sir how do i make my notes? do i just rely on the textbook? please help me x
@inderpalhayer35074 жыл бұрын
Hii I need help on this question, don't understand how to solve it.The enthalpy change of HYDRATION of MgSO₄ can be found using two seperate calorimetry experiments. ΔH for dissolution of MgSO₄ (s) = -85 kJ mol⁻¹, and for MgSO₄.H₂O (s) = + 9.5 kJ mol⁻¹. What is ΔH of hydration of MgSO₄?
@daisylawrence74477 ай бұрын
36:19 won't the concentration of reactants change as reactants get converted to product, so less moles of reactants?
@Anonymous-ll1pj2 жыл бұрын
Great ... On point 👍👍
@vee4815Ай бұрын
thank you is all i have to say
@HamzaElsharkawy-n7z8 ай бұрын
AMAAZING VIDEO!!!!!!!! I LOVE YOUUUUUUUU. BBG
@raulbabbar54152 жыл бұрын
🐐
@Fafa222 жыл бұрын
5:37
@the_crackin361010 ай бұрын
This a whole ahh movie bruh
@livontheedge101 Жыл бұрын
Saving my whole chemistry Alevel 🙏🙌🙌
@daanyaalkhan26872 жыл бұрын
But that shits not too bad is it 😂😂😂
@cyrusfrei8073 жыл бұрын
Lifesaver. Very concise and all bases covered.
@kazuki28826 ай бұрын
57:55 on the right side of equation isn't it 2H+? since you lost a hydrogen ion from propanone.
@garimagrg67963 жыл бұрын
TYSM! i was having trouble understanding but it all makes sense now!!
@nightwing44073 жыл бұрын
hi at 27:36 the rate has quadrupled then how it is a first order reaction? when u said when rate quadruple it is second order reaction and when it doubles it is 1st order reaction?
@wanker53993 жыл бұрын
It's because the concentration quadrupled as well. For a first order, the change in concentration is proportional to the change in rate, in this case the concentration increases by 4x and so does the rate, but if this were second order, the rate would have increased by 8x, not 4x.
@karimaakter25983 жыл бұрын
Hello @Malahim kashif , ik i'm but here it is :) It's first order because [NO] has increased by 4 times as well as the initial rate.So [NO] is directly propotional to the initial rate as a result it is first order. hope this helps
@ahmedibrahim9082 Жыл бұрын
SO CONFUSED. HOW IS 0.63 TIMES 4 2.58 ISN'T IT 2.52 ?? CAN WE INGORE THESE SLIGHT CHANGES 27:30
@luhvs3 ай бұрын
im so confused too
@raz41143 ай бұрын
yes if it is roughly the same then you ignore it
@AG-ql1sy Жыл бұрын
19:20 what happened to you saying it can only be worked out experimentaly and not from the equation
@ahmedibrahim9082 Жыл бұрын
I think it was already calculated and they just gave it in the question, no idea why he referred to the 2 moles in front of the nitrogen.