Editorial Analysis | 27 September | The Hindu Editorial Today, Vocab, Reading, Grammar

Editorial Analysis | 27 September | The Hindu Editorial Today, Vocab, Reading, Grammar | Rupam Ma'am

Рет қаралды 6,636

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 98

@BankingWallah 3 ай бұрын

🎉 Month-End Super Sale! 🔑 Unlock 2x Validity on Bank Mahapacks and get an incredible 75% OFF on Live Batches! Offer valid till September 30th-act fast! ✨ 👉 Bank Mahapack- physicswallah.onelink.me/ZAZB/lurri5ka 👉 AIM Foundation Batch 2025-26: physicswallah.onelink.me/ZAZB/4yvmub4f 👉 Banking Test ONE PASS: physicswallah.onelink.me/e0oG/opnklqrz 👉 Maha Vishwas Pack (2 years): physicswallah.onelink.me/ZAZB/miywgf40 👉 To Get daily DPPs, CA and Tricks, Checkout: t.me/pwbankingwallah

@ANJALIbanker. 3 ай бұрын

7/9 Thank you ma'am ❤❤🎉🎉

@Krati_bindra 3 ай бұрын

7 out of 9 Thanku so much mam ❤ Wonderful session Aaj ka passage bhut hi badiya tha

@gulafsha530 3 ай бұрын

Today's editorial:- This editorial appears to discuss the importance of impartiality and fairness in judicial proceedings. It highlights the critical role of judges in ensuring justice is not only served but also perceived as fair. The language used by judicial officers can be a significant factor in revealing hidden biases, whether intentional or not. Such biases can undermine the credibility of the judicial process, making it essential for judges to be cautious and deliberate in their choice of words to maintain impartiality and uphold public trust. My score 8/9 Thank you ma'am ❤️❤️❤️

@muskansardana7061 3 ай бұрын

score 9/9 today's editorial "The heart and soul of judgement is to be fair". The supreme court of India has rapped judges over the knuckles,asking them to refrain from casual observation. This matter become serious because of a judge ( Karnataka High court) V.srishananda bad comment to a woman lawyer and this all was live stream then supreme court criticise the judge . The judge apologies after the suo motu notice . The supreme court also warned the judges of haryana and Punjab high court . For this a handbook was also released in 2023 to assist the legal community in identifying, understanding and combating stereotypes about women . Judgement should be fair , not prejudice ,if judge's verdict is biased than no body trust the decision of courts . thankuu ma'am❤❤❤❤❤

@AshishPatel-qn4tm 3 ай бұрын

Today's editorial says that.... The supreme court of India has reprimanded or criticized communal , who has biased or misogyny. The apex court say's judges and everyone in the judicial are aware of the responsibility . Every judge 's judging should be fair and apex court delves into, judges must adhere to the values laid down by the constitution . Thankyou ma'am

@gayatridash-0807 3 ай бұрын

7/8 thanks ma'am fr this session❤

@aditidubey07 3 ай бұрын

Today's Score - 9/9 .. THANK YOU MA'AM ❤️

@Worthlessonly 3 ай бұрын

8/9 Thank you for the editorial ma'am ⭐🧡⭐🧡

@Geetanjalikumari101 3 ай бұрын

7 The Supreme Court of India has taken significant steps to uphold women's rights and ensure justice Recently there was an incident involving a Karnataka High Court judge who disrespected a woman lawyer in two separate proceedings which is unacceptable behavior from someone in a position of authority and this rule is also mention in the handbook Thank You Mam 🙏

@sarikayadavv 3 ай бұрын

Quipped -joked,jested, bantered Contrite-remorseful, apologetic,penitence Stereotyping -pigeonholing, generalization, conventional (पहले से ही धारणा बना lena की ये इंसान तोह ऐसा ही है) Stern - strict,severe, harsh Perpetuate - sustain, maintain, prolong, perennial Prejudice- preconception, partiality Fraternity - association, brotherhood,coterie

@sahilverma5375 3 ай бұрын

Today's Editorial:- Recently Apex court's Five-bench judges headed by CJI(chief justice of India) DY Chandrachur deciphered Karnataka High Court Judge over sexting comment to a female lawyer in open court which was going live and recorded aftermath SC suo moto taken this incident and gave notice for the same to HC Judge and judge apologize for the same and SC also remarks that a judge should be unbiased and respect or adhere to the constitution's laws. This is not the first incident when Lower or middle court's judges prejudiced someone and commented a unlawful statement. However a handbook was also released in 2023 which describes the eithics and laws that should be followed by the judges but it seams reckless until now. Hence it is again a great move by SC hope after this the judges of lower may be more cognizance in court hearings. Thank u mam❤ 8/8

@dimishamahyavanshi8098 3 ай бұрын

8/9 ❤❤ Nutshell of article--- The Supreme Court cognisance the bias decision of high court over that the top court castigate and asking them for their misogyny or biasness. The top court told that the high court adhere to the constitution . Precedent case of karnataka high court where the judge comment on woman lawyer and he is guilty of it. Similarly another case cognisance by Supreme court where the high court declared some region as ' Pakistan ' . After these case the Supreme court said that the high court should adhere to the regime while there is a handbook to combat gender stereotyping . The judges decision should not be bias or prejudice toward one parties. Thank you soo much wow ma'am ❤❤

@parthkataria2282 3 ай бұрын

Score - 9/9 Thank you mam!

@soul-7e 3 ай бұрын

Supreme court of India observed that fairness is heart & soul of judgement. It reprimanded judges & said that judges, must comply with the provisions of constitution and they should abstain from providing statements that can lead to misogyny or biasness. In 2023, apex court provided the handbook, with glossary of unjust terms & their alternatives, to combat stereotyping in judicial system. Marks:- 8 Thank you

@susmitagharami5184 3 ай бұрын

Q--8/9 Passage 7/10 Thank you ma'am for this fruitful session ❤❤

@SifaAli-l1d 3 ай бұрын

THANKYOU SO MUCH MAM TODAY SCORE=8/9 TODAY DISCRIPTIVE The Supreme Court reprimanded judges and advised them to not make negligent observations. Now the hearings of court are not bounded in four-walls of court. Some courts used live-streamed during their proceedings .In judicial fraternity all judges and everyone should be adhere all norms and act accordingly. The act of V.Shrishanada, Karnataka High Court judge is very disappointing.Not only he commented on woman lawyer but also called "Muslim dominated locality in West Bengal as ''Pakistan''.The judicial system must be true and fair and also neutral in all the times.

@ruchi5904 3 ай бұрын

Crux of today's editorial: The Supreme Court of India has criticized judges for being biased and sexist and making "casual observation". The judges must abide by the constitutional values and must not have prejudice. The court proceedings are accessible to all as they are live-streamed and so they must act accordingly. A five-judge bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, D.Y Chandrachud rebuked the Karnataka High Court Judge for making a sexist comment on a woman lawyer on two different judicial proceedings. Moreover, the Karnataka High Court Judge had previously called a Muslim-dominated locality as 'Pakistan' which was fundamentally wrong under the constitution. The Judge apologized thereafter. The Attorney General and the Solicitor General advised the Court to arrange in-house proceedings so that the misinformation would not be circulated on social media. But this was joked by the CJI. The court has also warned a judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court of making "random, unwarranted " remarks during proceedings. The court came out with a handbook that contains gender-unjust terms to fight against stereotyping within the judiciary. The first and foremost religion of the Judiciary bodies is to be fair in all senses.

@vineekumari2017 3 ай бұрын

8/9 thank you ma'am❤❤❤

@Banker_Bittu00 3 ай бұрын

6/9 ❤❤❤ Thank you Mam 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

@prasadnikita3008 3 ай бұрын

9/9 Thankyou mam..

@shalusonkar800 3 ай бұрын

Thank you ma'am 7/9 ❤❤😊😊

@harshitajangra8056 3 ай бұрын

Crux of today editorial Supreme court of India has criticized judges for being based and sexist making " casual observation". Judicial proceeding is live streaming in some courts. And last two months court has cautioned a judge Punjab and Haryana High court to stop making "random unwarranted" remarks on proceeding. My first descriptive 😊

@shivanibhardwaj2108 3 ай бұрын

9 out of 9 Thank you ma'am👼 The glossary of article, the supreme court works robustly on circumstances of court room and judges too. After cameras are assembled in courtrooms each and every element can be noted. The apex court mentioned that the judges have to be unbiased in their judgements. To consider gender equality, the Supreme court create a handbook. The judges have to be changed their haughty behavior towords other.

@sandhyasinghverma3123 3 ай бұрын

Vocab Revision..7/7 Rc..8/9 Thank you mam ☺️

@jasu4695 3 ай бұрын

9/9 thankyou ma'am ❤❤❤ nice session ma'am

@KannuPriyaChauhan 3 ай бұрын

9 out of 10 Thank you mam for the session ❤❤❤❤

@KartikBhatia-i8l 3 ай бұрын

Today's score 8/9 The crux of the article: The Supreme court has castigate the judges that reveal their bias behaviour and providing stereotype judgements,top court also stated that judgment should be fair and unbiased adhering to all rules and values written in the constitution as proceedings are live streamed in various courts and this can also create negative impact on the entire judicial fraternity .

@Lalagurjar-ek8dt 3 ай бұрын

Thank you mam 💗😊

@palak3312 3 ай бұрын

8/9...today marks....❤❤ Descriptive today ..❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ ...A judge shall perform his or her judicial duties without favour, bias or prejudice. A judge shall ensure that this his or her conduct,both in and out of court, maintains and enhances the confidence.,.. Of the public,the legal profession and litigants in the impartiality of the judges and of the judicial.... Proceedings in the course of which the evidence is or in which any judgement, sentence or final order is passed on recorded evidence... Six crore values are recognised.... Independence,impartiality, integrity, property, equality,and finally competences and deglance..... No, discussion shall take place in parliament with respect to the conduct of any judge of the Supreme court or high court in the discharge of his duties except upon a motion for presenting an address to the president praying for the removal of the judge as here in affter provided.... thanku ma'am ❤❤❤

@sanjuktamaharana5111 3 ай бұрын

score-9/9 Today's editorial- The supreme court of India has reprimanded Karnataka High court judges for making misogynist commentary on a female lawyer, which is completely against the constitution . Also haryana and Punjab high court judge has done random commentary . The Chief Justice of India has said that this act of not following the values of constitution will have negative impacts on the judiciary system. For combating and understanding the stereotype about women the supreme court has released a handout as it is very sensitive. The judges should stick to the values and not be biased against any community or gender . Thank you ❤

@0ldMonk_YT-9 3 ай бұрын

7/9 ❤❤ Thank you ma’am ❤❤❤

@khushishivhare7020 3 ай бұрын

Essence of editorial - The Supreme Court of India tell off the judges to not reveal their biased behavior and misogyny. As one video clip of Karnataka High Court revealed featuring Judge V. Srishananda and his sexiest comment on woman lawyer. He also commented Muslim - dominated committe in West Bengaluru as 'Pakistan'. The Bench took the note of statements and said to not compare any territory to Pakistan. Thank you ma'am ❤

@NAVEEN_SINCE_2004 3 ай бұрын

9/9 Thank you ma'am

@khushishivhare7020 3 ай бұрын

My score 8/9 Thank you ma'am ❤

@DIPALIPATEL2818 3 ай бұрын

Score - 8/9 Thank you Ma'am

@OmVibes44 3 ай бұрын

Nice session as always

@TrustheProcess-g5e 3 ай бұрын

8/9🕊️ Description of the Day: The top court of India have stringently lambasted those Judges who are revealing their communal biasness and misogyny during the verdict in the court, as in many occasions around the country the high court judges are amateurish towards women lawyers and referred Muslim dominated locality in west Bengaluru as 'Pakistan'. In 2023, the court released a handbook to combat gender stereotyping about women. It is inescapable for the court officials to be neutral towards their verdict and run the judicial ecosystem without any biasness towards any community, gender and religion.

@nandinisvideos6893 3 ай бұрын

The top court of the Country criticized strictly to the High court judges for unbaised behaviour towards community on the basis of gender misbehaviour, muslim dominance and so on. The Supreme Court suggested to judges that make their verdict the basis of practical experiences and follow Constitutional values. The Supreme Court also provided a handbook to judges on 2023 to improve their harsh behaviour. The Supreme Court spreads fairness and unbaised judgement among the society so that people can faith on the judges' verdict. Thank you so much ma'am 🙏🏻🙏🏻😭

@Jyoti-sr7cr 3 ай бұрын

Crux of the article..... The Supreme court castigated the Karnataka high court judge V shrishananda for stating sexist comment for a woman lawyer.The SCI clearly said that court will not take biased decision behalf of religion or gender.The court has also released a handbook to control the notions of gender biasness .The Supreme court of India also under scored that the heart and soul of the judgement is decision which is taken without being slated over one community. Thanku mam😊

@twinklerajput2882 3 ай бұрын

The Supreme Court of India has ordered High Courts to refrain from judicial proceedings that reveal biased behavior towards certain communities. Their duty should be fair, and judges must strictly follow the rules laid down by the Constitution. A five-judge bench stated that a Karnataka High Court judge's sexist comment to a woman lawyer during two separate judicial proceedings, and referring to a Muslim-dominated locality in West Bengaluru as 'Pakistan,' adversely impacts the entire judiciary institution. Last month, the Supreme Court cautioned a judge from Haryana and Punjab to stop making random, unwarranted remarks during proceedings. In 2023, the court released a handbook to combat gender stereotyping within the judiciary. Thus, the judiciary ecosystem must function without bias toward any community. RC score 8/9 Thanku ma'am ❤❤

@PragyaShakya-vy1jq 3 ай бұрын

I scored 6/9 The Crux of today's editorial The Supreme court of India has delineated that the misogyny in the judicial proceedings are live in some courts in the country so that, The blunder mistake which is made by Judicial officer Srishananda has become a big matter, and it was impacted on the judicial system, for that, the one bench of judges decided that srishanand should have apologized for the blundrind.

@sanskritichaudhary8254 3 ай бұрын

Score -9/9 The Supreme Court has reprimanded Karnataka High court judge for making a prejudiced and sexist comment on a woman lawyer. The court has strictly ordered not to use any sort of language that can bring the whole judicial community in the negative lights. As the judgement is made live in certain areas the Supreme court asked to take care of language and to not pass any comment beyond constitutional values. Also the Apex body has released a handbook in 2023 to assist combating the prejudiced and stereotypical biasedness towards women. It is important for members from judicial community to lay stress on it otherwise it will set a wrong example in front of society.

@ariaaariaa-o4r 3 ай бұрын

7/9😊

@UshaHazra-ob7og 3 ай бұрын

Good morning

@SonyNaresh-ym4vm 3 ай бұрын

My score 9/9 Homework ....... The supreme court of india has castigated Srishnanda (The karnatka high court judge ) for his misbehaviour and bad comment to a woman lawyer during judicial preceedings. The top court said that judges must aware of rules and acts by constitution and also comply with the guidence provided by our constitution .

@nandinirai3202 3 ай бұрын

The video clip of Karnataka High Court was disseminated across the country, in which the court judge V Srishananda uttered some inappropriate statements to a women on two separate judicial proceedings. In response, a five judge special bench was headed by the Chief Justice of India. The apex court has framed the judges belligenerly and reminded them about their brink under which they should made their statements. They ceveated them for their culpable action and asked them to maintain the decorum of courtroom. Along with that, they highlighted the fact, that few judicial proceedings were live steamed across the country, therefore it got observed by a huge crowd. Previous another two cases of different culpable activity were noticed, firstly the Karnataka High court was caught referring a Muslim centered place in a West Bengal as 'Pakistan'. To this, the Supreme Court found it illegitimate and sent the Suo motu notice and refrained judges with a direct note, in which they delineated that calling any part of Indian Territory as Pakistan was against to the Indian Constitution. Secondly, the Punjab and Haryana High Court was captured for their stereotype comment about women and came front with unique gender unbiased term inked in their respective book. After observing the complete scenario, the top court recollected the judicial fraternity to wary about the sentences they expressed in the courtroom and sterned them to be mindful with their definition as they were the ones who were known as carrier of justice.

@dipanshisoni5056 3 ай бұрын

today's score:9/9.😍

@varshadwivedi4048 3 ай бұрын

The Supreme Court of India took suo motu of video clip featuring Kartanaka High Court judge v.srinada to his sexiest comment to a woman lawyer on two separate judicial proceedings. On a previous occasion he had referred 'Muslim dominated locality 'as Pakistan .The bench took stern note that remark that you cannot call the Indian territory as Pakistan. Although the Judge apologized after suo motu notice, calling it is a contrite apology. Thanku ma'am ❤ 7/9

@DipanshuDhakrey 3 ай бұрын

8 out of 9

@anupanwar7879 3 ай бұрын

Today's score 8 out of 9❤

@microworld-z9e 3 ай бұрын

8/9

@Jyoti-sr7cr 3 ай бұрын

7/9

@meghaasthana1141 3 ай бұрын

The Supreme court of India has berated the judges for the communal bias which is against the value laid down by the constitution. Judges must abide by the rules and should avoid forming opinions based on the biasesness or stereotypes also be aware , their proceedings are not in purview of the four of the walls of courtroom. Five bench headed by ( Chief Justice of India) D.Y. Chandrachur invected Karnataka HC judges for sexiest commemt to a female lawyer and called a muslim locality in west bengaluru as Pakistan , which adversely effect the image of judiciary as a whole and also wrong under the constitution. The judge who commented these things apologized after the notice. The court has cautioned a jugde to stop doing against the rules . In 2023 , handbook released by the court to define and combat the stereotyping.

@Krushndasi 3 ай бұрын

9/7

@sarikayadavv 3 ай бұрын

The supreme court scolded the judges ,stated that no one will say anything bad against women and should behave properly as this matter is not confined to four walls .A video is watched by the court in which a lawyer was using abusive language for a women . Upon seeing this,the bench of five judges stated that if such actions are repeated ,it will greatly harm our judges federnity.

@armyoftheviralmath 3 ай бұрын

8/9 The Supreme court reprimanded judges to refrain from casual observations that reveal their communal bias or misogyny. There are availability of live streaming in some of the courts across India so judges must be vigilant about their actions. In Karnata high court one of the judges was observed by a five judge special bench headed by CJI accused of sexist comment to a woman lawyer. Later the judge contrited for his comment. In an instance ,the judge of karnataka high court refered to a Muslim dominated locality as Pakistan. Nobody can refer a place in India as Pakistan .In 2023 ,the court released a handbook to combat thr gender stereotyping from judges. Gender Stereotyping may violate the fundamental right so it need a severe punishment if anybody violates it. Thank you!

@vishakhaseth2666 3 ай бұрын

8/9 Taking suo motu by the Supreme court of india on Karnataka high court who give bad remark on female lawyer. The supreme court of india ordered the Karnataka's judge V. Srishananda to apologize in court while live streaming is going on. And for also Karnataka judge calling a part of india as Pakistan . Court released a handbook in 2023 where everything is written very clearly how to address women or a group of people. Thankyou Ma'am

@Mahto100 3 ай бұрын

score 7/9 The Supreme Court of India has rapped Judges and asking them to halt from making casual observation that reveal their communal bias. Supreme court has also said that Judges and everyone in the Judicial fraternity, must be aware of the responsibilities and act accordingly. They should strictly adhere to the value laid by the constitutional. The Supreme Court was not happy with the sexist comment to a woman lawyer, of Karnataka High Court Judge V. Shrishananda. This kind of comment show them in a negative light and impact the entire judicial Institution adversely. On a previous occasion, Karnataka Judge referred to a Muslim dominated locality as ‘Pakistan’. The bench took a stern note of that remark as well as. And the Judge apologized. Last month too, The court has cautioned a Judge of Punjab and Haryana High Court to stop making unwarranted remarks. Supreme Court released a handbook to combat gender stereotyping. Carries of Justice should be mindful of this at all time.

@Ms.Ankita 3 ай бұрын

8/9 The Supreme Court of India D.Y Chandrachud has warned the Karnataka high court judge on his sexist remark on woman lawyer in the courtroom which is unethical. Ater that the judge has apologised to supreme court. The CJI has also added that these stereotyping remarks are not suitable for a reputed judge and should not be repeated thereafter. To combat with these gender stereotypes the supreme court has launched a handbook consisting glossary of gender equality.

@Wowsaniya5 3 ай бұрын

Today's score - 7 / 9 By the sexist comment of V.Srishananda to a woman lawyer at the Karnataka High court. The supreme court is scolded the court and gave cautionary notice to be fair with everyone. Said that, in a technological word now judicial proceeding are live streaming. Where is nothing beyond the walls of court. Just like this the Karnataka High court judge represented a West Bengaluru area is a Pakistan this is constitutionally wrong. In 2003, a handbook released by the court in which they gave an idea to run the judiciary system of India without the feeling of baisedness and stereotypes.

@Worthlessonly 3 ай бұрын

1)By..court information is missing.2) court has scolded 3) omit the court in 2nd line 4) tecnological world 5)where nothing is 6) use referred instead of represented 7) area as pakistan which is 8) in 2023 not 2003 9)glossary not idea .......

@gulafsha530 3 ай бұрын

Worthless tmne hi iska correction kr diya😂😂

@Worthlessonly 3 ай бұрын

@@gulafsha530 Tadap hi aaisi thi..raha nhi gaya 😆😆

@gulafsha530 3 ай бұрын

@@Worthlessonly 😂😂

@srijalshukla2135 3 ай бұрын

Supreme court of India had to reprimand who judicies were heated or biased with women. Supreme court saw live streaming of some courts of the country . Judges should be aware and fair of his judgement. Supreme court took suo motu aware of video clip of Karnataka high court judge.

@RubinaMoneyMaker 3 ай бұрын

Good afternoon ma'am Today's article tell us about judicial officers must be mindful of language that reveal biase The supreme Court has rapped judges over the knuckles, and asking to refrain from making " Casual observation " that reveal their communal bias or misogyny. Now supreme Court asking the judges must be aware of the responsibility añd act accordingly. The " heart and soul of judging is to be fair", it observed, and noted that judges must strictly adhere about the Constitution, and not be guided by prejudice. On a previous occasion, the high court of Karnataka judge had referred to a Muslim dominated in West Bengaluru as ' Pakistan' , the judges apologised after the suo motu notice, and calling it a " Contrite apology ".the judicial ecosystem must run without any bias towards any community. Stereotyping any person on the lines of gender or religion will perpetuate harmful inequalities, and carriers of justice should be mindful of this at all times. Thank you so much ma'am for this wonderful session❤❤❤

@ritumotla5407 3 ай бұрын

2/a

@SunitaDevi-gl2me 3 ай бұрын

8/9 Top court of india scolded judges and ordered to refrain from "casual observations" That are related to misogyny. A judge of karnatka high court pass a sexist comment to woman lawer . A five - judge bench has observed that headed by chief justice of India. Karnataka's high court judge apologized. Earlier karnataka's high court judge, a large numbers of muslims community called "pakistan" That is constitutionaly wrong .

@kashishaggarwal3149 3 ай бұрын

Ma'am 4-h & 7-c hona chahiye na ?

@ishupanday 3 ай бұрын

The supreme court of India 's bench it is headed by chief justice of India Mr.chandrachud rapped Karnataka high court judge over prejudice and sexist comment on a female lawyer in Court. Supreme court of India suggest all judges and lawyer should unbiased .this is not first incident when male judges used derogatory comment on women. Karnataka high court compare India's place withPakistan this is very derogatory. Judges adhere to constitutional rule. To maintain believe in judicial procedure. I wrote first time 🙏

@shyoshankarmeena8127 3 ай бұрын

madam -mere ki bhi sikha tho english

@HarshVerma-tb2uo 3 ай бұрын

Ma'am isme homonyms bhi add kijiye

@SupriyaKumari-bl4ig 3 ай бұрын

The Supreme Court of India has observed the communal bias or misogyny in judiciary proceedings by judges. And the court gave order to apologies beyond the four wall of a courtroom. On a previous occasion the Karnataka High court judge referred to muslim locality in west Bengaluru as Pakistan. The bench strictly note that you can't call any part of the India called Pakistan. This is against our Constitution. The judge apology the suo motu notice. The judicial ecosystem must say that the judges can't bias towards any community or gender sensitised.

@SAHIR_007 3 ай бұрын

7 out of the 9 🔥 Ma'am Wow Vocab ki Monthly PDF de dijiye 😄❤ Thank you ma'am ❤

@khushimahale229 3 ай бұрын

Suprem court of indian has scolded judges to not give and projectil comment in last month karnataka high court has given sexist remark on woman lawyer the five judges of special bench has critised to judge.further Supreme court saith judges have to strictly adhere to rules Score 9/9 ❤

@Sandip-pakhira 3 ай бұрын

Crux of judges unconstitutional behaviour: The supreme court of India has rebuked judges to refrain from making casual observation. Judges must strictly adhere to their constitutional and responsibility and according to it but not guided by prejudice. Judges cannot remarked anything which was unwanted and offensive like Muslim dominated locality means Pakistan and any misogyny comment. They must be mindful about their language. Although the judge apologized but it was very bad for our country because some court has been proceeding on live-stream and beyond of people reach across the country. In 2023 the court released a handbook regarding gender injust term, suggesting alternative words during drafting and proceeding . The judges should be mindful about their responsibility and the judicial ecosystem must run without any bias.

@shailimishra-lu4ly 3 ай бұрын

Karnataka High Court judge V.srishananda commented to a women with an unfair pathetic language this is a little kind of disrespect moment for a women those who commented on a women, is a judge .The judge should maintain the limit the way of talking as well as should maintain there professional job . Keeping this things in mind.The Supreme Court of India has rapped judges over the knuckles. On the other hand karnataka high court judge highlight to a muslim -dominated locality in west bengluru as'pakistan'.this was not a right way to talk after the judge apologised suo-moto notice R.venkataramani and solicitor General suggest that they should be apologise in front of the court as well as social media

@aug22864 3 ай бұрын

Crux.... Supreme court suo moto to stop making random remarks during the judgement. Supreme Court says that proceedings are live streamed in some cort which reflect image of judicial fraternity across the world. Court released a handbook to combat gender stereotypes in 2023.

@falaknaaz4792 3 ай бұрын

The supreme of india has warned Karnataka High court judge V. Srishananda sexiest comment to woman lawyer. the judicial fraternity must be aware of the responsibility because the judicial proceedings are live stream in some countries not in four wall in the courtroom judges should strictly follow the provision gives in tha constitution. A five bench judge head by chief justice of India D.Y. chandrachud remarks the negative impact the entire judiciary. In past occasions the Karnataka High court judge said a muslim dominated locality in west benguluru as pakistan and the bench strickly said you cannot call any part of territory of india this is fundamentally wrong under constitution then the judge apologised after the notice. Attorney general R. venkataramani and solicitor general Tushar Mehta had advised to hold procedure in house because they were concerned misrepresented on social media. In 2023 , the court provide a hand book which describe gender stereotyping and ethics etc. Thank you so much ma'am ❣️ 6/8 Ma'am kya mai ab thoda thik likh rhi hu phele se? Plz tell me.

@shriramsharma1 3 ай бұрын

9/7 THANK YOU SO MUCH MAAM 😇

@abhishekbhardwaj3057 3 ай бұрын

Crux Of The Editorial The Supreme Court of India has raprimanded judges of the high court because of their communal bias or misogyny. Recently, Karnataka High Court Judge V. Shreenanda made a sexist comment on a woman lawyer. In some courts judicial proceedings are live streamed across the country that can impacts the entire judicial system adversely. In an another judical proceeding the Karnatka High Court judge referred a muslim loacted area as "Pakistan" . These types of statements are fundamentally wrong in our constitution. SO with respwct to these incidents a five judge special bench headed by Chief Justice Of India Mr. Chandrchud to lookafter this matter. Thanks Mam...........

@ruhi8545 3 ай бұрын

The supreme court of India has repped judges over the knuckles and asking them form making "casual observations". The supreme court said that the top court was firm that judges and everyone in the judical fratrnity mut be aware of the responsibility and act accordingly..the suo motu cognisace of the video clips featuing karnataka high Court judge's his sexist comment to a woman lawyer on during two separate judicial procedings and refered to a muslim- dominated locality in west bengaluru as 'pakistan'. And that the remark as well constitution, Last month the court had cautioned a panjab and haryana high Court to stop making "random unwarranted" Remrks during proceeding. In 2023 the court relesed a handbook to combat gender stereotypinng withing the judicarly and the handbook say that in indentifying understanding and combating sterotypes about women. The thus judiciarly abot the funcition of the biast community.

@ruhi8545 3 ай бұрын

My score = 8/9 maam mene 1st time likha hai pta nhi sahi hai y galt maam kuch galt likha ho summary to sorry.