Is this of law available for hindus of pakistan and Bangladesh??In 2005 waqf board land was 3 lakh acres now 9 lakh acres.. how did they get?? How did they claim whole village along with 2000 year temple?? What kind of law it is even can't go to supreme court??
@ravindranmokkilmaruthur232 ай бұрын
If bjp has not brought this to the fore how many of us would have known that waqf board has such powers.
@sanjaymalwe35292 ай бұрын
Sadly you forgot to mention ( knowingly or unknowingly) that the Wafq act act announce any land belongs to them and they themselves are the judge in the matter.
@jibraan1231002 ай бұрын
No the survey commissioner appointed by the state government decides
@SunnySir6892 ай бұрын
Another Dhruv Rathi loading ..........😂😂
@augendandaddend60312 ай бұрын
Absolutely. He should devote more time talking about his own state where corruption and religious fanaticism is at rise!
@SJ-tm6iq2 ай бұрын
Where is the audit for PMcares fund?
@GP-hr2md2 ай бұрын
Sir I wish you would one day make a show highlighting how Unfairly and discriminatory was states have taken charge of Hindu temples and their properties and how much it exploits the wealth of Hindu temples. No just a lay by comment while defending rights one specifically one religion .
@NasirKhan-fx8hq2 ай бұрын
Very good and fair analysis. Being Muslim from Hyderabad, Muslims waqf properties is being encroached by mafia including so called Muslim political party of Hyderabad. If the waqf properties manage properly and generated fair revenues could help eradicate poverty among backward Muslims.
@khanathar88212 ай бұрын
Bring a bill to audit pm cares fund
@ravikhanolkar8552 ай бұрын
Applies to Rajiv Gandhi Foundation also?
@SanatanaDharma-Indian2 ай бұрын
Stop supporting congress this is ridiculous Because how can waqf claim Whole village and Court, even 1500 year old temple as its property How can it become 3rd largest land Holder after Railway and Army This is pure hipocrasy
@rg66652 ай бұрын
WAQF amendments is not for religious reasons. It’s to control corruption and streamline the process. Don’t make it religious. Like any other boards govt’s job is to put a check on issues.
@RajeshSarangarathinam2 ай бұрын
Good argument sir but one question to you. When state governments can hold Hindu religious board to govern the property and all its affairs why can’t one government official can be added for governance of Muslim properties? Also when it comes to immovable asset there are other religion people who has issues in claim which needed involvement of court as government have no stake in providing solution to the affected parties. You can cover a story on affected people due this core issue in Trichy surrounded village.
@Random_Guy_Bharatwale2 ай бұрын
Why we need wqf act These type of things should not be there
@VijayLaxmi-qx2zg2 ай бұрын
Why waqf board in India, who's land is this.. how waqf land is more than government lands.. who has given them . If Mughals ruled India doesn't mean land belong to Mughals and they can donate.
@trueindian5102 ай бұрын
This is not a religious matter. This is land matter. To be honest, how pn earth does waqf is the latgest landowner in india. I am not a modi support, but the waqf board should be banned.
@adityamahakali77032 ай бұрын
but they are enchoraching, government regulation has to be there. This country must be run by constitution not by some aasmani kitaab
@pallavved38882 ай бұрын
Country is supreme...
@Vij3672 ай бұрын
Hindu Religious Boards, particularly those managing major temples, generally generate far more income compared to Waqf Boards. The scale of donations and the value of assets managed by Hindu temples are typically much higher. Both Waqf Boards and Hindu Religious Boards share similar roles in managing religious endowments and serving their respective communities, they also face common challenges, such as mismanagement, corruption, and lack of autonomy. Addressing these shortcomings requires better governance, increased transparency, and ensuring that the management of religious properties aligns with the community's best interests.
@Tly-hy7de2 ай бұрын
Bro, you may have issues with Hindu Temple management. However, we Muslims don’t have any problem or complaints towards Waqf Board.
@umairsyed74652 ай бұрын
@@Tly-hy7deWAKF should be made more transparent and accountable to Muslims community Muslims entrusted them to the welfare of the community
@venkateshnaik14362 ай бұрын
similar roles 😂😂😂😮😮
@Ind_u.2 ай бұрын
😂 you do know that waqf board has 3rd largest in land acquisition? 😂.
@coconutpunch1232 ай бұрын
You are expecting transparency and good governance from modi? 😂. Seriously? This just another anti muslim bulldoser law to make bhakths happy
@prembagui71042 ай бұрын
I believe that giving MPs a seat and reclassifying already developed Waqf property directly infringes on the religious rights of Muslims. However, I support most of the bill. It's essential that we enforce a strict code against all religions in India and limit the power of every religious group, as most often misuse their religious rights. The freedom to practice one's religion should be secondary to all other rights, and every aspect of religion should be scrutinized and discouraged if it doesn't align with even one person's moral standards, regardless of their religion.
@MegaZoning2 ай бұрын
Glad no one claimed whole india under waqf.. issue will be solved 👌
@safarcl2 ай бұрын
@13 minutes: Not only MPs.... even the PM, Rashtrapati, CM, Ministers, Governors, judges etc are Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Christian, Marxist etc. We used to hear the wide mouthed propaganda by the elected/ nonelected leaders and cadres of each and every political party.... boasting about their role in instating a dalit, tribal, minority person in such and such post and position! Simultaneously we used to hear the verbiage of certain "fugitives" boasting about alienating or keeping certain communities away from the veranda of power! We used to hear from the vishaguru and his parivaaris even during the election campaigning, the utterly disgusting and divisive monkey-baath! How is it possible to believe the words and logics of a team driven by a fascist ideology... and take it for granted!?
@satyanarayanacharyulumarin47422 ай бұрын
you are free not to believe a thing in democracy and to protest but in democratic non violent way.
@ajaypatra28632 ай бұрын
Rijju should reveal the names of Muslim MPs who came to meet him and were supportive of Government Agenda. The BJP is confusing the country.
@shajidhussain14792 ай бұрын
Bohot Jhooth Bolo is acronym for BJP
@yasminfinlay80182 ай бұрын
Who are these darpok muslims ? If they are so concerned they should own up and speak out! I don't bel;ieve the minister's claim - easy to make such a claim in a climate of already rampant distrust but in order to prove their point blame it on some mysterious entities.
@ajaypatra28632 ай бұрын
@@yasminfinlay8018Thank You Madam. Your statements are One hundred percent true. With best wishes.
@ajaypatra28632 ай бұрын
@@shajidhussain1479 Yes. Brother.
@pingliusting40192 ай бұрын
😊@@shajidhussain1479
@dhanthapa29492 ай бұрын
Waqf board should be abolished with immediate effect that is the only solution.Otherwise they will grab all the India this way slowly slowly.
@mouryatanniru47292 ай бұрын
Please talk about why this bill is brought? Mr. Sujith. Talk about how waqf boards claimed 1500 yr old sundereshwar temple in trichy district of TamilNadu. Please have some shame. Waqf board is illegal, they have usurped land like anything bcoz of no accountability. What is this donation of land without any agreement??
@tharakhgeorgechacko11482 ай бұрын
They could have just created another subsidiary court or team to check the corruption and land grabbing...putting MPs, district collector with vested interests in the midst of this will either make the system worse or more corrupt
@aspirant98452 ай бұрын
Why they should have this privilege
@nagamalluri70592 ай бұрын
Every one agrees board is not transparent then why crying ? Becoz bill was passed by BJP ?
@AnithaSanthosh-eo1ly2 ай бұрын
Very good bill
@ajaypatra28632 ай бұрын
There is corruption in the Waqfs board. But the Government should be free from corruption charges. What about ED officer Mr. Yadav caught red handed taking a bribe of 20 lakh rupees ?????
@khanathar88212 ай бұрын
Bring a bill to audit why Indians are going to other countries for jobs
@prakshraoagali56592 ай бұрын
Indians are going because.... there is no land to live, our country's land belongs to Wakf!
@dnadsh23112 ай бұрын
Ok Arabakth
@natarajamnarayanaswamy53292 ай бұрын
Waqf act should go lock stock and barrel.
@shamakrai33102 ай бұрын
I believe that Government should interfere in religious issues. This is because we follow positive secularism of "सर्वधर्म संपन्न" which is different from negative secularism of "separate of religion and state". This clarifies that govt can interfere in religious matters of any religion. Also, even though muslims don't preach it, they still follow the evil practice of casteism in which lower caste muslims are facing atrocities by the upper caste muslims. Here, govt have to take a stand.
@SanatanaDharma-Indian2 ай бұрын
Stop supporting congress this is ridiculous Because how can waqf claim Whole village and Court, even 1500 year old temple as its property How can it become 3rd largest land Holder after Railway and Army This is pure hipocrasy
@Shuffle-f2x2 ай бұрын
First take initiative from your side to invite WAQF board to claim lands of Sujit Nair,National Heralds and Bill supporting commentators and PR team here. Let see how far you guys can do. 😂
@salihak33192 ай бұрын
Thank you Sir For Speaking the Truth
@mytube20oneone2 ай бұрын
MPs do not have religion ? What about Sanghi MPs ?
@RAVITESHKUMAR-bq1pj2 ай бұрын
What about pappu gandhi 😂? Italian bar dancer😂
@satyanarayanacharyulumarin47422 ай бұрын
mp are representatives, as such they share every conscious aspect of their lot of people as they are individual. In representative capacity they are spirit of their constituent people of religion as well as belief.
@ravindranmokkilmaruthur232 ай бұрын
What about thonghis.
@khanathar88212 ай бұрын
Bring a bill to audit properties of adani and ambani
@dnadsh23112 ай бұрын
Ok Arabian Army
@khanathar88212 ай бұрын
Bring a bill to audit how much bribery is taken by govt employees
@yugsneni2 ай бұрын
Thirumala temple is being monitored and controlled by govt …. Why can’t waqf board be controlled … Congress ideology will never change
@rajeshisyourfriend2 ай бұрын
It's no more a religious matter at all, consider a waqf board claim a property of person or comity the only people who are running waqf board are the one to decide. "सैय्यन भये कोतवाल तो डर काहे का". Tomorrow waqf can come claim a property of their control, they don't need to show any agreement to government or court. waqf said so it is. How many of you think it is a democracy.
@ushahariharan32682 ай бұрын
Thank you Sujitji🙏
@jaggunarainalasingar30682 ай бұрын
You could have enlightened viewers about Waqf Act 2015 ,which was later repealed
@sunilkeskar37952 ай бұрын
Precisely explanation
@shajidhussain14792 ай бұрын
Excellent Editorial sir,,,, WAQF is for the Muslim community, so how can Non Muslim be a member and how can a DM be a deciding factor. This is not acceptable by any means. It should be held by Muslims only. All MPs belong to some or the other religion.. saying MPs don't have any religion is a rubbish statement by the Minister...
@callofbrokendreams2 ай бұрын
WAQF was granted unlimited land acquisition right by a parliamentary body full of hindus too, PM PV narsimha Rao granted waqf strong rights as a means of appeasement for babar masjid event.
@avneesh172 ай бұрын
How can they accept or capture hindu and govt property and you cant approach court.
@aspirant98452 ай бұрын
Waqf is government body, so it should members from all religion
@Unibro_Reactions2 ай бұрын
17:34 Vishwas days are gone. Should have been created from both sides. No vote no vishwas
@khanathar88212 ай бұрын
Bring a bill to audit how petrol litre increased from 60 to 110 rupees in just 1 year
@yame13052 ай бұрын
Let's do it! If we the people want it, there is definitely a cause and need to be put forth.
@naturelover70522 ай бұрын
We need to dicuss how a tree grows also
@javed45032 ай бұрын
For last so many years wafq has so much property but it was not used for upliftment of muslim community..
@dadi15102 ай бұрын
Absolutely true. The government must not have any interference in religious matters. The two MUST always be separate.
@avneesh172 ай бұрын
The govt control our temples , more over waqf can declare your party as waqf property and you cant do anything about it.
@aspirant98452 ай бұрын
Waqf board is not a religious board it's a government body
@SanatanaDharma-Indian2 ай бұрын
Stop supporting congress this is ridiculous Because how can waqf claim Whole village and Court, even 1500 year old temple as its property How can it become 3rd largest land Holder after Railway and Army This is pure hipocrasy
@jaikrishnaullal77762 ай бұрын
There are too many mafias ruling the nation. Maybe controlling at least one mafia may be a good thing. The Select Committee can come up with an acceptable Bill, maybe. Meanwhile there were many past news about Karnataka govt attempting to control waqf misuse. There were 2 committees which were appointed one after the other (one appointed by BJP govt and later a second one appointed by Congress govt)and they both reportedly said many leading persons were land grabbers. The relevant dates are 2012 and 2020, I believe and maybe you can do a check on whether anything has happened at all after 2 consecutive committees reported the same thing in Karnataka. If no reforms have come out as a result of these 2 reports which are reportedly similar and unbiased, then where do we stand as an honest state? I read about all this in Frontline magazine and in various news reports
@saurabhtripathi75952 ай бұрын
This is first i don't agree with you now i feel you spoke person of opposition. Because you opposes each and every step taken by government. Thank 🤘
@rajhs68762 ай бұрын
I think these amendments are progressive. Two weaknesses are collectors having the final say. Instead the disputes can be dealt by usual courts like high courts etc non-Muslims on the board. May be a retired supreme court judge could be feasible
@mytube20oneone2 ай бұрын
Listen to Muslims. Let them choose acceptable ammendments and reject unjust ammendments.
@MegaMicraman2 ай бұрын
Yes. If there's a problem then they will sort it out. India has 99 problems and this isn't one of them
@juliuscaesar10392 ай бұрын
They themselves saying they don't have brains to make a proper judgement. They are brainwashed to follow orders of Mafias and hence seek Govt intervention.
@xyzabc1622 ай бұрын
How come waqf board can claim Taj Mahal What about common man Will you say the same if temples start claiming lands Are Muslims very special
@ravikhanolkar8552 ай бұрын
Good point @@xyzabc162
@ajitnadgouda60792 ай бұрын
You are almost saying that give this country to Muslims and let them choose whether they want to rule or just leave.
@darksarcasm64562 ай бұрын
The waqf board is claiming entire villages, that's how any religion works? Are that rights of any religion? And if govt can't interfere in waqf board then how could previous governments gave all powers to them? At least watch and read your own arguments
@khanathar88212 ай бұрын
Bring a bill to audit how much money bjp spent upto 2024 from 2014
@mannangopikrishnan49282 ай бұрын
It's not about religious interference .. It's about.. Properties.. There must be proof of owning it. If u can accept money from non Muslim..why not have Non Muslim in governing .. If it suits u..u accept.. If it doesn't..then cry..foul.. Don't look..who proposes.. Look what it provides..
@learningislife2122 ай бұрын
The provision of including Muslim women and Bohras and other communities is a great progressive step.... But at the same time, inclusion of non Muslims and the role of DC are problematic
@fauzmohammed62242 ай бұрын
Waqf is a system followed by Muslims...i don't think any other religion has such a system. Hence, the board members should be from the Muslim community...having women as board member is fine, but is there a need, unless that person is a very strong administrator...qualified people should be on the board, be it male or female, but a quota for women is not necessary. Rather than an internal audit, a 3rd party audit would be better anytime, even if it is CAG. What is an MP going to bring to the board? Also, is he going to be from the ruling party or the opposition? Making the District Collector as the supremo is detrimental. This bill is brought with the thought that BJP is never going to lose power...there seems to be more politics in this bill than a good intent.
@juliuscaesar10392 ай бұрын
Don't grab anyone's land. That thing needs to go and at the same time. Only Mosalams should be allowed to donate that too via PAN Aadhaar verification and NO CASH NO NO DIGITAL to ensure Pakistan or any other terrorist is not funding them. Women should get representation. Mafias must be ousted completely.
@LahariMathyala2 ай бұрын
Is this type of law available for hindus of pakistan and Bangladesh??In 2005 waqf board land was 3 lakh acres now 9 lakh acres.. how did they get?? How did they claim the whole village along with the 2000 year old temple?? What kind of law it is even can't go to the supreme court?? Our temples are under endowment and collecting donations goes to the government and they are going to waqf board again... What is the contribution of the waqf board to the Indian economy ?? It's Zero.. still how many days only Hindus have to suffer??
@tharun5412 ай бұрын
Never knew taking over temples is also mentioned in Islam. Wow! Is that why 1500 year old Tiruchendurai temple of Tamil Nadu was taken over by WAQF? What a great achievement by WAQF!
@fauzmohammed62242 ай бұрын
@LahariMathyala There is a presumption here that the Board has illegally taken over villages...is there any proof or is it an allegation? I cannot deny that there is or may be corruption involved...the flip side is that more people may have given properties to the Waqf as well, and hence the increase. If, as you say, Waqf has taken over a village, have the people benefitted by it in any way? The Waqf is a body that maintains and manages property only...thay cannot sell it. As per laws, they are exempt from income tax but do have to pay the sales tax etc on rents. As far as I know, Waqf is available in all Islamic nations and the intent is to benefit the people. If I am giving something to the Waqf, my intention is to get a reward in the Hereafter...if the board mismanages it, they are answerable to the Almighty.
@ajitnadgouda60792 ай бұрын
Bro you are saying Muslims should decide whether it is a Muslim land or not. He will definitely say it's a Muslim land. The collector can be Muslims but he will be under the government, but definitely not working under Shariya act.
@saravananc71212 ай бұрын
The bill should be passed and only one sect domination should end and even the shias ,bhiras and ahmadiyas arr welcoming it moreover two non muslims are need so that there can be many irregularities can be stopped so i support this bill
@barkhauttwani67482 ай бұрын
Sir, Religion is one thing politicians always want to use in their agendas... We need them to see their own hypocrisy.. The best part is that now atleast bills will be discussed in JPC.. a victory for democracy!!!!
@p.l.narayana90912 ай бұрын
Make UCC and make all people below one law of Land
@venkateshnaik14362 ай бұрын
it would have been better if existing wakf act was explained to understand the amendment bill sir. but .... 😂
@vasuchavala34282 ай бұрын
It is good amendment I support this bill
@ManavtaCharitableTrust-i7p2 ай бұрын
, this is what BJP has done in all previous bills in last 10 years.
@ravikhanolkar8552 ай бұрын
Have you read any of the previous bills.
@ssnugy95082 ай бұрын
i am not supporting anything or being biased i think... but its not about religion ...it is about property and unregistered property make it for every religion to be accountable ... unless all think that being accountable is bad... my 2paise in the matter
@ks4422 ай бұрын
Amendment to save Antilla 😅
@LahariMathyala2 ай бұрын
Is this of law available for hindus of pakistan and Bangladesh??In 2005 waqf board land was 3 lakh acres now 9 lakh acres.. how did they get?? How did they claim whole village along with 2000 year temple?? What kind of law it even can't go to the supreme court??
@ajitnadgouda60792 ай бұрын
Amendment to save India
@ks4422 ай бұрын
@@ajitnadgouda6079 Bharat Khatrai Mai Hai
@ks4422 ай бұрын
@@ajitnadgouda6079 desh khatrai mai hai !!!
@ks4422 ай бұрын
@@LahariMathyala why should u worry about Pakistan & Bangladesh
@amitpatilamay2 ай бұрын
How fair is waqf board claiming 1500+ old temple , Allahabad High Court and other such property.
@opedsk2 ай бұрын
Wakf needs to be abolished
@mariapetma2 ай бұрын
I think the govt should not interfere with other functioning and need to handled by the right authority. Govt should focus on right functioning of the country.
@jvince39712 ай бұрын
Will there be JPC on Demonetization, 2000 currency printing, SBI bonds, NEET scam,EVM still in doubt will there be JPC on these issues
@rachnagupta83462 ай бұрын
Sir, nice editorial. Concise and crisp. Govt has partially achieved their objective of addressing their vote bank. If they want to reform waqf board, first furnish credible reports and data then go for reforms. Same holds good for Hindus devasom boards. This govt has no reforms in its mind… their want to weaken minorities and show to their vote bank that see we are correcting them..
@preetiraut77002 ай бұрын
Hindu board don't claim lands and harrase people like waqf board did in Village, temple. Even they once claimed Surat High Court govt land as theirs after building mazar besides court. So don't compare hindu trust boards with waqf board.
@preetiraut77002 ай бұрын
Also you talk lot about minority but the fact govt control temple and it's funds but not mosque, or any other religious trust. Here people won't have any problem.
@GautamDeshmukh2 ай бұрын
There's no scope in the constitution for such boards and tribunals .Every kind of bodies should be guided and audited by the constitutional laws only .
@sandeepdhanote50082 ай бұрын
A bill being sent to PC after 10 yrs of dictatorship. Thanks to Bangla Desh.
@neildcosta59322 ай бұрын
As you have rightly said, let every religion enjoy full autonomy within their four walls with Government intervention, only if they overstep that freedom and disobey the law of the land. Today, corruption has permeated every level of religious administration, across all religions. There is no remedy except for the people within to band together and make a change. Alternatively, if one finds his/her religious administration stifling, disconnect completely and follow the faith of your heart independently. No one can be denied that freedom. I really don't believe that MPs are religion-neutral, not after this past decade. Your clips of swearing-in oaths are proof enough.
@AkshayKumar-wo2cx2 ай бұрын
Bro is confused himself
@spotlightvideos98212 ай бұрын
Yeah....that is good observation...heart says it is a good ammendment mind says oppose it in any means😂
@BinaSingh-p8p2 ай бұрын
more governance, less goverment?
@SanatanaDharma-Indian2 ай бұрын
Stop supporting congress this is ridiculous Because how can waqf claim Whole village and Court, even 1500 year old temple as its property How can it become 3rd largest land Holder after Railway and Army This is pure hipocrasy
@ravindranmokkilmaruthur232 ай бұрын
The Parliamntary Committee will go through the bill and give their suggestions. The bill will be taken up for discussion and passing in the next session.
@NagarajanVasudevaRao612 ай бұрын
Superb.👏👏
@rameshvenkataraman88292 ай бұрын
If you cannot trust district collector, why should you accept all-muslim tribunal ? Why should they object to CAGI Audit ? Let the board operate independently but answerable to Govt MPs should be kept out. They are the unscrupulous people misusing power
@rameshramaswamy21782 ай бұрын
Why should there be an Waqf Act?? Waqf board is enough, with a common court of law. This anchor only shows bias than giving a unbiased assessment
@GirishMakhija2 ай бұрын
Abolish waqf board !
@khanathar88212 ай бұрын
Where is pm cares fund audit report
@albertfernandes63862 ай бұрын
Modi wings 🪽 are trimmed. It showed when bill is sendcto parliament select Committee. Good news.some positive.
@HariharanS-e3h2 ай бұрын
How the land owned by waqf doubled in the last 15 years?
@amorrfeus2 ай бұрын
Could the board have come up with better self regulation? When it fails & encourages government to forcibly interfere, we end up in a pickle
@viswanathanharihara12 ай бұрын
Waqf board can notify ANY piece of land as waqf land and govt can do nothing about that, as per 1995 amendment. Have you not heard of an entire village near Thiruchirappalli in thamizhnadu INCLUDING A 1500 YEAR OLD SIVA TEMPLE declared as waqf property and state government could do nothing about that even though there are not many Muslims living there. Same things go for a gurudhwara in Haryana. You have overlooked that point. As usual your editorial is half baked.
@manaamahemad87732 ай бұрын
the bjp whenever they bring a bill against Muslims they defend it saying all the Muslims have shown support to that bill we have been in touch or been requested to do these changes and they blame that it is you ( that is the opposition and actual Muslims who protest ) select few who are trying to manipulate the Muslim community, we have seen this during the Triple talak bill, during CAA NRC, during Article 370, and now in Waqf Borad bill
@aspirant98452 ай бұрын
So all those bills were bad?
@manaamahemad87732 ай бұрын
@@aspirant9845 the gov has no right or authority to interfere in anyone's religion
@aspirant98452 ай бұрын
@@manaamahemad8773 government has right, because waqf board is a government body not a religious body
@SanatanaDharma-Indian2 ай бұрын
Stop supporting congress this is ridiculous Because how can waqf claim Whole village and Court, even 1500 year old temple as its property How can it become 3rd largest land Holder after Railway and Army This is pure hipocrasy
@manaamahemad87732 ай бұрын
@@SanatanaDharma-Indian I'm not supporting congress all I'm telling is the bjp has only one agenda that is to target the Muslims however and whenever they get the chance and this time it can be because of the elections in UP and other states. and please don't believe anything the media says and if you believe then bring the proof, you can share me the links if you have any to back your claim.
@nagarajvishnupad312 ай бұрын
Including non-Muslim is not needed. My suggestion is to list down the complete working of the waqf committee members and change/modernise those contentious issues that Muslim people are facing, I think, including qualified Muslim women and representation from other sub caste within Muslim communities in waqf board should be voluntarily encouraged and empowered to bring in transparency and accountability. The courts should be the final arbiter and not district collector.
@aspirant98452 ай бұрын
A government body should contain members from all religion
@SanatanaDharma-Indian2 ай бұрын
Stop supporting congress this is ridiculous Because how can waqf claim Whole village and Court, even 1500 year old temple as its property How can it become 3rd largest land Holder after Railway and Army This is pure hipocrasy
@15090619732 ай бұрын
Waqf board is not religious, it s not belong to any region, its a board not a church, or temple, its an organization. If you say strictly its for Muslims then all organization will be divided like Wipro will go to Muslims, all Ambani s will be for Hindu s, I think here you are dividing the whole India, you should first change this I guess.
@SanatanaDharma-Indian2 ай бұрын
Stop supporting congress this is ridiculous Because how can waqf claim Whole village and Court, even 1500 year old temple as its property How can it become 3rd largest land Holder after Railway and Army This is pure hipocrasy
@preetiraut77002 ай бұрын
Yes these people just blindly support anything.
@khanathar88212 ай бұрын
Bring a bill to audit how Jay shah became president of bcci
@khanathar88212 ай бұрын
Bring a bill to audit what has bjp govt done for farmers in 10 years
@khanathar88212 ай бұрын
Bring a bill to audit why Ed and Cbi only make cases against people who ate anti bjp
@prakshraoagali56592 ай бұрын
How many bills you need!? Say also bring a bill to audit your home to know what all you do and consume...!?
@baqirhemraj76392 ай бұрын
The constitution provides for freedom of conscience and the right of all individuals to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion; mandates a secular state; requires the state to treat all religions impartially; and prohibits discrimination based on religion. The Preamble of the Indian Constitution has the word "secular", and articles 25 to 28 imply that the States will not discriminate, patronise or meddle in the profession of any religion. However, it shields individual religions or groups by adding religious rights as fundamental rights.
@alexanderthegreatest40352 ай бұрын
Ambani’s home, Antilia is built on Wakf Land!!!
@alexanderthegreatest40352 ай бұрын
And that’s the reason the bill has been brought - to protect Ambani
@Ind_u.2 ай бұрын
@@alexanderthegreatest4035😂 you don't even know how to edit a yt comment lol.. that Ambani case is already dismissed by court.
@coconutpunch1232 ай бұрын
@@Ind_u.😂. Which court in india will take decision against mukesh ambani? 😂
@LahariMathyala2 ай бұрын
Joke... Waqf board claiming your home... Go and give them...
@LahariMathyala2 ай бұрын
Is this of law available for hindus of pakistan and Bangladesh??In 2005 waqf board land was 3 lakh acres now 9 lakh acres.. how did they get?? How did they claim whole village along with 2000 year temple?? What kind of law it is even can't go to supreme court??
@prashantshetty68022 ай бұрын
1995 and 2013 amendments were not passed through JPC. But you didn't say it was undemocratic. 2024 amendment has been referred to JPC and you say that if that hadn't been the case, then democracy would have been in danger. Which school did you attend?
@khanathar88212 ай бұрын
Bring a bill why main stream media is called godi media
@khanathar88212 ай бұрын
Bring a bill to audit properties of shah
@leenaganesh80362 ай бұрын
The same Muslims interfered in shabarimala temple women inclusive case , n y not govt interfere in waqf board ? Y not ?? Modi govt s doing good ! Good going !
@vinayakrao28812 ай бұрын
With hidden agenda and not discussed earlier when introduced and now want it discussed!
@Iam_ro312 ай бұрын
What you said is to solve issue without favoring Muslims and non Muslim, the objective of govt is not that, they are searching for a modern ayodhya narrative that should work for next 30 years.
@alibasith48662 ай бұрын
Sir i am muslim and i saw most of muslim saying we represent them, they are takimg land of waf baord, if really tjis govt want to stop this, do it but same time they have allow muslim also other regions board. If not this is just try to interfer and make politics
@SanatanaDharma-Indian2 ай бұрын
Stop supporting congress this is ridiculous Because how can waqf claim Whole village and Court, even 1500 year old temple as its property How can it become 3rd largest land Holder after Railway and Army This is pure hipocrasy
@khanathar88212 ай бұрын
Bring a bill to audit how many crores adani and ambani has given to bjp
@ravindranmokkilmaruthur232 ай бұрын
Claims on so many properties in some states - this was allowed for so many years - It is significant that some muslim organisation are welcoming it -
@karthikr1772 ай бұрын
I somehow find your argument extremely basic. I somehow failed to find the logic in whatever you are talking. When wagf can occupy temples and claim places of people of all religion it seems like there is an absolute power given for the reason of religious appeasement. Neither The Hindu board the Christian board or the Muslim board should be given such kind of autonomous power. The law has nothing to do with the type of worship or the practices that people are doing. It is about managing the properties. And even more is this about regulating how a property can be acquired. Do you really believe that a word of mouth can be taken for a donation? Let us say tomorrow someone is coming and claiming that I donated someone something, the only way my son or grandson will be able to understand if it is true or not is using a document. Why should this particular board be exempted of that.