Elbridge Colby Responds to Mearsheimer on China at All-In Summit

Рет қаралды 55,496

Intercollegiate Studies Institute

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 171

@gelinrefira 2 ай бұрын

Westerners cannot abandon the colonial mindset. If you are a thief, you think everyone is a thief.

@joyceching6487 2 ай бұрын

"IF YOU ARE A THIEF, YOU THINK EVERYONE ELSE IS A THIEF, " TOO 🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯 !!! 1,000% In Agreement. 😊

@gregoryedwards9097 2 ай бұрын

Precisely. Your reflection of the world is a reflection of who you are. Says a lot about our leaders in the West. Our leaders a children of the Golden Age of the West, growing up with the world looking up to them. Despite everything they’ve done, many of our leaders have gone unpunished for their crimes. If children who are never punished become spoiled brats and selfish adults, I wonder what that would make grown adults who’ve never been punished for decades.

@zhangyi5145 2 ай бұрын

you have to admit that westerners are so self-projective on themselves

@marktrinidad7650 2 ай бұрын

lol. funny but true. the west would not like to abandon their global domination. China's rise was a total disaster for western hegemony and scrambling very hard to undo the situation.

@danieltemelkovski9828 Ай бұрын

Lol at all these silly Chinabots. Japan, Taiwan, India, Vietnam, Philippines - none of these are "western" and all of them have security concerns about China. Try again.

@starfish253 2 ай бұрын

Why is it ok for the US to be a regional hegemon, but not for China? Argument doesn’t make sense

@teohsweesiang1480 2 ай бұрын

typical western double standard....in values, human rights, etc.

@uncomonsense 2 ай бұрын

Geopolitics is not driven by what is "OK" from an objective perspective. Each nation state looks after it's own interest. This should be fairly obvious to any observer.

@kungfukenny101 2 ай бұрын

@@uncomonsense agreed

@David-ut3zv 2 ай бұрын

“Because I am white and I am better than you!” If that is not loud and clear, take a look at Gaza.

@limitlesssky3050 2 ай бұрын

@@uncomonsenseIf the US can look after its own interest, why can't China do the same thing?

@petervote7914 2 ай бұрын

U.S. bases and troops in East Asia cannot deter North Korea, the "island chain" troops can deter China? Where is the sense and logic in that? It is complete nonsense.

@RamonEstevez-g6m 2 ай бұрын

Funny he can only think of war as the anerican way

@barrywong4327 2 ай бұрын

JM’s is unapologetic imperialist and US empire cheerleader. His views in regard to China are narrow-minded, hubristic and delusional. No amount of smearing, interference and provocation by the US could stop China’s advance and development. This is not the 19th or 20th century, US hegemony is going down. The US would continue to be an influential country, but so will other rising countries, chiefly China, Russia and India. The US empire would be wise to accept the reality of the multi-polar world order, adapt and adjust. Taiwan is part of China. Get out! It’s none of your f****** business.

@rap3208 2 ай бұрын

JM is all about realism, Johns not cheerleading but merely telling what is. nevertheless, if there is world hegemon, sure he would like it to be the US.

@gregoryedwards9097 2 ай бұрын

Realism is such a self fulfilling prophecy. The same way that China did everything it could to not only learn from the West, but to also safeguard itself from what it saw happen to other nations including the USSR and the Middle East. The US would benefit a lot from learning from China. We do not have all the answers. Realism will end this world, 4.5 billion years of evolution gone, and we only have about less than a billion years left before it expands to a Giant Red Sun. God knows how many million years or if ever if intelligent civilizations will resurface if we blow up this whole world.

@L98fiero Ай бұрын

@@rap3208 No, as much as I agree with his realist theories regarding how the US/West acts, and has for 2 or 3 millennia, it doesn't necessarily comport with Asian attitudes and China's in particular

@lVlagnificentGaming7 Ай бұрын

You're an idiot. You wouldn't have the computer that you're watching this video on with Taiwanese chips. Taiwan is quite possibly the most important country in the world in terms of economic significance.

@raylamberton6002 2 ай бұрын

American aggression.

@frankiedehockie 2 ай бұрын

China strategic is economic. China is the largest trading partner of All the countries listed as “partners” in Asia, - including India. China operates differently than Western countries. Historical and present, Chinese consumers goods and market have been the draw for foreign countries. Asia is not a place for military hegemony. The current policy of the US to stop China instead of competing will lead to China dominating Asia and the rest of the world.

@ddtking7630 2 ай бұрын

This guy wrote a book?! Who’s wasting money buying illogical rubbish?

@Mia3HD 2 ай бұрын

😂

@lVlagnificentGaming7 Ай бұрын

Name exactly what he said that's illogical. We'll wait.

@BitKoinETF 2 ай бұрын

You were at a loss of words to describe Canada - how about "VASSAL"😂

@L98fiero Ай бұрын

@@luckyfox5627 "America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests" ~Henry Kissinger

@aungmyohtike 2 ай бұрын

Ask this question to so-called scholars: How many American lives will they risk to defend Taiwan in reality? Not in theory. China can always risk more.

@zhangyi5145 2 ай бұрын

risk my ass, even US sends its army on the island, we Chinese still can beat the shit out of it. Please don't talk like US can win a war around China as far as it can take more so-called "risks".

@christiane-yoga Ай бұрын

the US has sacrificed millions of US lives in WWII, by tricking and lying to enter the war, same happed for the lies they fed us to start the Vietnam war, w now know thanks to the files that have been Unarchived that even the Cold War was all a hoax...9/11? terrorism? Iraq, Afghanistan, I mean..the list goes on and on not to mention all the coups d'etats don in the name of democracy, which is so hypocritical when the IS isn't even a democracy, but an oligarchy.

@captsiva 2 ай бұрын

not clever colby....................ordinary mind....................peanuts

@JoshuaPoopsie 9 күн бұрын

He actually makes a lot of sense and appreciate being candid about US interests vs "lets stand for demicracy" propaganda

@petervote7914 2 ай бұрын

Everything in the video is nonsense. The history is nonsense, the theory is nonsense, the logic is nonsense. All nonsense.

@採菊绚麗 2 ай бұрын

History and civilization did not start only in the 18th Century. Learn Historical facts and different cultures seriously. How long will Anglo-Saxon mainstream media and politicians be able to exploit the ignorance of their audience and supporters respectively ?

@yt1536 2 ай бұрын

Exactly!

@chankane 2 ай бұрын

Maybe referring to Gordon Chang? A China specialist? Bwahahahahaha!

@gregoryedwards9097 2 ай бұрын

Gordon C Chang and Peter Zeihan been wrong for at least ten years lmao

@maynotbe 2 ай бұрын

China & Russia Navy near alaska is in "response" to usa, germany, Netherlands Navy ships in south china sea & taiwan strait. don't instigate if you don't like the response ! the future concludes to one thing "energy" who ever achieve abundant lowest cost energy wins. obviously China

@lVlagnificentGaming7 Ай бұрын

Based on what? Where are you getting the notion that China has abundant, low cost energy? China is still operating coal plants and America has 10 times the oil/natural gas reserves of China

@deltafoxtrot3519 2 ай бұрын

Deindustrialization by the developed world was due to developed world corporates choosing to outsource production to countries with cheaper labour so as to maximize profits for shareholders. This has benefited business owners in the developed world, but hallowed out manufacturing. The export model was encouraged by rich multinational corporates. His logic is faulty.

@jasonl3254 2 ай бұрын

He advocates potential war with China just to keep American industries at home. What ever happened to laissez-fair economics, which America has championed for so long?

@gregoryedwards9097 2 ай бұрын

Exactly

@iScoopyPal 2 ай бұрын

He is just another clown!

@AbaddonianG 2 ай бұрын

Colby gets it .

@BitKoinETF 2 ай бұрын

US doesn't want to be the global hegemon? Your mouth was moving but you were clearly speaking through your ass🤣

@tsuikr 2 ай бұрын

No, he is speaking from his brain, and that is the problem!

@rajivshah6128 2 ай бұрын

You are in denial boy!

@jamesmoy1214 2 ай бұрын

Morons talking bs😂

@David-ut3zv 2 ай бұрын

He is asking how many American cities should be risked to contain China economic development? Is he insane?

@mikewong8500 2 ай бұрын

Never count chickens before it hatches. Rethoric more like selfish interest in controlling the world where no one should be better or equal position. That's the problem with US having this type of guy having this type of mentality.

@aaronsmyth7943 2 ай бұрын

Listening to guys like this gives me a strong conviction that the US is heading for a major whooping.

@kevinmacintyre4003 2 ай бұрын

The overriding theme appears to be that everyone wants independence of policy. Which he appears to support for everyone except countries that are currently under US hegemonic control.

@kishm1724 2 ай бұрын

So you are saying use Indias manpower in WW3 against China and the Muslims like Democrats used Soviet Unions in ww2 against Germany So USA wouldn't have to risk.and lose much

@madsam0320 2 ай бұрын

Americans just wanted to fester antagonism among neighbors, they have no shared interests in Asia.

@bikerd12 2 ай бұрын

Crazy!

@ronniecheong2146 2 ай бұрын

The united states says only we americans can rule the world others are not allowed dont even think about it get it

@PhiloSurfer Ай бұрын

The Monroe Doctrine has always been invoked by the US to dominate its sphere of influence. However, what is not spoken is that the Monroe Doctrine also declared that the US would likewise not intrude in others' sphere of influence.

@vidsurf88 2 ай бұрын

Clueless of China mindset ... China was the greatest civilization for thousands of yrs... they never had colonization ambition but focus more on trade....hence the Silk Road started

@prasitkoysiripong5150 2 ай бұрын

I am not sure how much they know China and Asia.

@rodneychew9893 2 ай бұрын

They watch cnn

@petervote7914 2 ай бұрын

Nothing. Absolutely nothing.

@view1st Ай бұрын

@@rodneychew9893 😂 😅🫡

@Lim-212 2 ай бұрын

This guy is talking in his sleep.

@AbaddonianG 2 ай бұрын

Australia : Big country New Zealand : Baby country .😀

@tonyyin8524 2 ай бұрын

I chuckled when Colby said US should act with "focus" to preserve its hegemony in Asia because he failed to explain how to overcome the fact vast majority of Asian countries have no interests in dying for the American Empire. People everywhere cares primarily for their own security and prosperity, and if the Beltway Blob makes them less well off than what Zhongnanhai offers, then they will turn their backs on the Imperium; which is what has happened in recent years.

@lVlagnificentGaming7 Ай бұрын

Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan have no interest in turning over their future to Beijing. It's laughable to suggest otherwise.

@BallyBoy95 2 ай бұрын

With a doctor, engineer or lawyer. You can figure out whether the person is competent by their work. The patient dies/survives, the product works/doesn't, or the defendant is successfully or unsuccessfully defended. With these politicians or "philosophers," you catch them out on something, they'll deny it to your face. They're just war-hungry, money & status-obsessed.

@999reader 2 ай бұрын

Two inarticulate so-called experts. I hope you, like, know what I mean. If you want to hear knowledgeable and well-spoken conservative views, listen to or read someone like George Will.

@MantouHao 2 ай бұрын

After reading the comments, I felt there's no further need for my comment already. 😂😂😂

@petervote7914 2 ай бұрын

A country "roaming" is a serious policy. It should be investigated carefully and based on historical study and facts and not based on so called IR theories. For example, North Korea is a small and poor country, by no means a regional hegemon yet it has sent 10 000 troops to Kursk in Russia. This must be seriously studied. Cuba likewise also sent thousands of troops to Angola and Ethiopia in 1970s. Portugal, a small country on the edge of Iberian peninsula sent naval missions all over the globe since 1400s. America since 1820s had anti slavery naval squadrons off coast of Africa. There is no connection between a regional hegemon and roaming. If a country feels that it wants to roam, it will roam. Nothing can stop it. Being a regional hegemon or not is completely irrelevant to roaming. Mearsheimer is wrong, he is not correct. He is wrong.

@BritishBungler 9 күн бұрын

The same people that told you NK sent 10k troops to Kursk are the same people who told you the Biden laptop was Russian disinformation. There are no NK troops in Kursk. The only NK troops that entered Russia were doing training exercises in Russia's Far East.

@bartsolari5035 2 ай бұрын

What the hell is "regional hegemony"?

@petervote7914 2 ай бұрын

There is NO connection between "regional hegemony" and "roaming". None whatsoever. Mearsheimer is wrong on that. Hello, can anyone hear me? Your theory is BS. North Korea is sending 10 000 troops to Kursk. U.S. military and bases in East Asia detered NOTHING with North Korea. North Korea is NOT a regional hegemon. North Korean troops ARE roaming in Kursk. Hello? Anybody home? Anyone at all? Hopeless man.

@merocaine 2 ай бұрын

Chill.

@jackhuynh2489 2 ай бұрын

Interesting point

@who52au Ай бұрын

Hoe the hell his book able to sell now with the 99 cents stores are all closed ! ?

@winkus8586 2 ай бұрын

I will believe what he said if i am a 3yo todler

@chillstep4life Ай бұрын

US is not a regional hegemon. It is a global hegemon... 😂😂 Nice try downplaying selfish interest.

@Novideos00 2 ай бұрын

The argument that China should not be allowed to dominate South East Asia is based on the assumption that that China wants to dominate South East Asia the same way as America dominates other countries using military force. This may be an incorrect assumption. China’s dominance rests on trade, business, economics and technology selling to south east Asia products the Asians wants at low prices. China has not invaded a single country in the last 40 years and the conflicts in the South China Sea is a reaction at being encircled by American bases in South Korea, Japan, Phillipines and Guam. America can re-industriallise but the the south East Asian market is unlikely to buy American products because it will be too expensive. Countries in the West , Europe, Australia and New Zealand will be the best markets for products from a re industrialised America. I can’t see the people in Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Myanmar, Pakistan and the central Asian republics with a much lower per capita income able to afford American made products. The people of China will buy their own locally made products.

@ronniecheong2146 2 ай бұрын

Lets talk nonsense for the fun of it ok

@AbaddonianG 2 ай бұрын

China : Big country. Taiwan: Baby country 😀

@rogeriopenna9014 Ай бұрын

Again the totally wrong understanding about what Mearsheimer says about China. Mearsheimer is NOT making a judgement of value about what the US should do or not Mearsheimer is saying that the US wants to be the hegemon, according to the realist point of view. He doesn't ever say US deserves, or should, etc. He is saying that's the US plan Then he says what the US should do for that plan to work. Mearsheimer gives lots of talks in China and says the Chinese understand him more than westerners. Fur the Chinese, Mearsheimer will say what THEY must do to court the US. And how the US will respond. The inevitable conflict with China is already happening, so it's not Mearsheimer desire or nonsense. It's reality. It didn't mean China is evil. It means China rise is causing the current hegemon to react to be able to keep its power. Unless China wants to submit to US, China will have to counter the US because the US will not sit and key China rise peacefully

@robertprawendowski2850 2 ай бұрын

Unforruntaely One of the most overhyped books i have ever read

@ddtking7630 2 ай бұрын

@@robertprawendowski2850 yet that overpriced piece of trash sorry I mean “book” was most likely printed in China!

@MrBahjatt 2 ай бұрын

Obviously the world is not enough for two global powers, even the USSR could not really sustain its economy and went into three or more decades of economic implosion before its went down. China's economy was primarily fueled by export led growth to Western nations, at least in the 1990s-2000s (decade) but has since developed its own domestic market, the only issue is, China is facing a 2008 financial crisis where there's more housing and other real estate than there is demand for: China could stop building one decade ago and still have enough roofs for everybody: look at the size of those ghost towns. Whether China will enter a Japan-style 'lost decade(s)' or just have to sustain low(er) growth rates remains to be seen, but one thing is clear, China will not eclipse the US economy any time soon, and even if it did, it wouldn't matter because it is not an innovation driven economy it is a manufacturing driven economy, and the US is trying to subvert that in the transistor arena. Indeed, the only real US concern over Taiwan is because Taiwan pretty much dominates manufacturing of transistors (though not the design, research and development of transistors) and without that, Taiwan would be pretty worthless to US strategic interests.

@Merdacity 2 ай бұрын

Do these people get taught English in school ? If so the teachers need to be upgraded. What is with all the hand gestures? Insecurity maybe?

@DucaTech 2 ай бұрын

The kettle calling the pot black.

@brianlowe3529 2 ай бұрын

The guys Hands talks faster then their crap 😂

@feihongwong2524 2 ай бұрын

This guy is talking for a military complex.

@MrMingsyin Ай бұрын

Another american warmonger or a proxy warmonger! Just read that this guy could be picked for the new trump admin.

@tangkwoksang2343 2 ай бұрын

please change your channel if you do not agree on them and that is so simple as ABC....

@Roxana-gu5zt 2 ай бұрын

JM can at least talk logically-this guy is incoherent or radically insincere, to put it mildly. An armchair militarist posibg as a political’thinker.’