A long-time follower of Jeffrey Sachs and John Mearsheimer here. I've leaned more and more to Sachs as my exposure and research on geopolitics and economics expanded. Mearsheimer's "containing China" stand became increasingly aligned with the disastrous US government's policy since Obama's "pivot to China" days. I kept asking and arguing, WHY? China worked super hard to get to where they are now. They elevated over 800 MILLION of their citizens out of poverty just in the past few decades. They're one of the oldest civilizations, they're smart, they're innovative, they work hard, they're entrepreneurial, they're pragmatic, they hate wars, they don't intervene with other countries' politics, they don't bomb, nuke, regime-change other countries, they have only one military base outside China (to primarily protect their interest in a critical trade route in the international waters), they've advanced their educationl system, infrastructure and status of their society, etc., etc. What business does the US have in containing this unprecedented endeavor to a betterment of a billion and half lives? China has the absolute right to become a powerful nation because they damn well worked hard for it and achieved it peacefully (unlike the West that prospered by of course hardwork but also by genocide of natives, slavery, colonization, and unimaginable brutality). I have therefore lost interest lately on Mearsheimer's "realism" of choosing one nuclear war over the other. Sachs is always on point, reasonable, respectful to the sovereignty of the Global South countries and their leaders he works with, and truly passionate about peace and development. I'm with Sachs!
@serogolemogole26852 ай бұрын
💯💯
@leesgtk89692 ай бұрын
@@mnet1514 I totally agree with you. If John Meirsheimer was merely explaining the bridal cold realities of US policies, he's a great scholar. But when it is also his agenda to contain China, I disagree and don't think that's a good holistic man
@mingyueliang95772 ай бұрын
A*.
@soulstar24012 ай бұрын
Hallelujah!!!
@James-hm9on2 ай бұрын
@@mnet1514 Mearsheimer is expressing the sad reality of American and human desire which is to become and remain dominant
@Walterkooy2 ай бұрын
They disagree on China, but they are respectful to each other. I agree with Sacks. Mearsheimer is thinking what’s good for America and Sacks what’s good for the world.
@WonderfulFreshwaterLake2 ай бұрын
What good is it for usa when nuclear wars happen? There are limits to how far you can push thing. What usa is doing is creating the condition that Will make sure, china becoming your enemy. And you want to destroy a country that have hundreds if not thousand of nukes?
@dlfincher68872 ай бұрын
I’ve heard Mearsheimer interact on news shows with antagonists. He was calm, patient and professorial; presented facts that could not be disputed. 2 men who should be consulted by our leaders.
@changshingeng2 ай бұрын
Sachs also is thinking what's good for America. No way a neclear war is good for America. Sachs wants US learn to respect another big power who gets nuclear weapons. Mearsheimer just believes nothing will work, let's go to hell together.
@DelMar-cz2kr2 ай бұрын
This is such a good way to put it!
@BCSTS2 ай бұрын
I think you need to listen to more of John M.....He is NOT just thinking of the US......He has done many interviews that show otherwise ! Here he seems to be doing that more...but I think he understands , knows & believes much more than that ....I encourage you to watch more interviews with him.
@scepisle49702 ай бұрын
Currently visiting China.... they are ahead of us in so many ways.... the infrastructure is amazing... imagine if we invested in ourselves instead of endless foreign wars..
@thisisobviouslynotmyrealname2 ай бұрын
but is that your experience based on 2 or 3 cities or in the country as a whole?
@1Matik_2 ай бұрын
@@thisisobviouslynotmyrealnamethat experience in just two or 3 cities is still better than what you’d get in the US.
@thisisobviouslynotmyrealname2 ай бұрын
@@1Matik_ ok, so i take it you are comparing apples to apples , like the 2 or 3 most developed chinese cities compared to the 2 or 3 most developed american cities
@juneack58482 ай бұрын
What I don’t get is that this is their country too. Why not have a beautiful environment. What is the benefit of all these wars? If you want to say that it comes back to the American people through capital gains in the economy, it doesn’t. It just makes us feel terrible for having no power when our country wages campaigns of wars across the world.
@seacresthill2 ай бұрын
@@thisisobviouslynotmyrealnameForget Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen. There are dozens of cities nobody in the west has ever heard of that have way better infrastructure than NYC or SF.
@hermansuherman4194Ай бұрын
Prof Sachs, thank you. You speak from the heart of humanity that yearns for peace and harmony. Some may despise and mock you, but billions stand with you. May God bless you and keep you.
@smileylady485Ай бұрын
So true...
@kaineamachree4945Ай бұрын
@@hermansuherman4194, well stated. I have always preferred Jeffrey Sachs.
@ayoubhamdi1Ай бұрын
Yeah but, what matters after all is REALITY! And the world simply does not work like that! It's a world run by states, and the nature of state-dynamics is not how Pr. Sachs sees it but how Realism - Pr. Mearsheimer - describes it. And it's not like it's a temporary circumstance in humanity, but it's always been this way, as history tells! Man gets to choose between being unrealistic and have delusional hopes and get dominated by the realists, or being a realist and try to do as much good - realistic good that is - as possible. The only scenario where the world can become a much better place is when it's run by a "moral pole", a pole (meaning the most powerful a state can ever be: a pole) that's based on REAL moral grounds and principles..
@rameaudelapierrecatherine531228 күн бұрын
Is it necessary to be an Empire if every body die and our old civilization is turned into ashes?????
@bigsmile7152 ай бұрын
My respect for Prof. Sachs has grown tremendously after hearing him in “all in summit” talk. He stood firm for his belief under a lot of pressure in that talk, he talks with a real compassion for humanity, and while he advocates for peace, he is not naive in his thinking. And the man understands China deeply. The world needs more men like him.
@Aston1sh2 ай бұрын
I believe he is very much naive. I heard him that “someone” should get a passport. He might have worked in USSR and Asia, but he has no idea what is going on on the ground in central/eastern europe an Ukraine. He advocates to understand both sides, why doesn’t he represent both sides opinions?
@TomLee-q1d2 ай бұрын
you are so right, the John guy rationalizes a war between two nuclear powers, it is how human get extinct, we are smarter than people like him. John Mearsheimer is evil, he represents who we are not. We are better than him.
@myla61352 ай бұрын
@@Aston1sh Why should he? He's not asking to be a negotiator representing both sides. He has a point of view that I consider to be commendable. He explains and justifies his point of view clearly and with passion.
@Aston1sh2 ай бұрын
@@myla6135 Hi Myla, I might be mistaken, but I remember his point of view claiming we should look at both of the sides opinion. Correct me if im wrong, and Inwill watch it again.
@myla61352 ай бұрын
@@Aston1sh I missed that bit. I did hear him say something like that about China. That we should not just look at it from the US pov but also from China's and understand why China reacts to US belligerency. I don't recall any point where he said look at both points of view and equate them. After all the US is always the aggressor in my book and deserves to be treated as such. I personally wish the US would go and take a running jump and stop meddling so much around the world creating mayhem. Utterly fed up with their ridiculous teenage behaviour ...... which goes hand in hand with their teenage culture and history. By comparison China is far more mature as is fitting for a country with their long history and deep culture.
@andysofly12 ай бұрын
This is by far the best panel on the summit. Two experts discussing facts, and no nonsense
@jamiewood38682 ай бұрын
Agreed. It was amazing
@MD-gw9kj2 ай бұрын
That we just had two presidential debates where none of the ideas were discussed for the American public to take to heart, yet a group of interesting techies have rolled up their sleeves and tried to take on the most critical topic for America, our allies, and the rest of the world. --proof of John’s take on the two political parties, and the fundamental importance of our freedom of speech, that allows the hashing out of consequential ideas.
@michaelloong9642 ай бұрын
@@MD-gw9kj If the world has no China, the US politics is extremely dull and mundane. The MIC will have no business and politics becomes non-profitable.
@jerrymouse69652 ай бұрын
Most preciously, no lies!!
@GingerPeacenik2 ай бұрын
Well, Sachs is certainly discussing facts anyway.
@RachealKingCHS2 ай бұрын
They agree and disagree with so much integrity. Two sensible powerhouse thinkers. Thank you for this!!!
@LeftWingNationalist2 ай бұрын
And their disagreement is about substance not insults.
@lijiang93992 ай бұрын
That’s how exchange of opinions should be between civilized intellectuals
@BTCSowhat2 ай бұрын
Please 🙏 copy
@Giggy24952 ай бұрын
They were probably the smartest presenters/debaters I have ever seen. Both are a class act in and of themselves!
@James-hm9on2 ай бұрын
So much integrity combining informed competent fact based debate . If you wonder why America is such a mess it’s because men like this are shunned by the media.
@yithuatteoh1156Ай бұрын
One of the best forums I have ever watched in my 71 years of living. Prof Jeff stands out as one of the most eminent thinkers of our time and one who stands on the e side of peaceful co-existence & anti-nuclear wars. My great respect to both Prof Jeff & John, both are great thinkers.👏👏
@MyAgefulLiving2 ай бұрын
I respect and admire Prof Sachs for his relentless push for a peace-driven approach. You can feel the passion in all his words, and elsewhere.
@koruptorbesar91412 ай бұрын
He is a very good man
@jimmytimmy36802 ай бұрын
After he Destroyed Russia in the 90s, he is making up for it.
@pieterviljoen16202 ай бұрын
A true hero !
@WellSalt-Studio2 ай бұрын
- John Mearsheimer(Jewish)'s point of view: Evil never disciplines itself, imperialism and militarism never discipline itself, and the infinite desires of evil will inevitably lead to war. - Jeffrey Sachs's point of view: When evil realizes that it may have to pay an unbearable price (nuclear war), evil will have to start to discipline itself. First of all, stop emphasizing freedom, give up those evil desires that you are unable to realize, and do self-management and self-adjustment. - Mao Zedong's point of view (1953): "The U.S. imperialists are very arrogant. Wherever it can be unreasonable, it must be unreasonable. When it begins to abide by morality and justice, it must have been forced to do it."
@Harz6042 ай бұрын
I feel like mearshiemers principle that US must maintain hegemony at all cost and it must prevent others from becoming regional hegemony is the very principle that created the deep state that he derided in the beginning. After hearing this talk it’s clear that he’s not against the IDEA of US being involved militarily / starting wars n conflicts around the world, he just feels like US is involved in the WRONG areas. Ultimately while he says he’s not interested in regime change in China, this is precisely what he hopes to achieve as it is the only way to maintain US hegemony (until the next #2 threatens that hegemony). As he said there’ve been 4 times when US hegemony were threatened: imperial Japan, imperial Germany, nazi germany and Soviet Union. All of them ended in regime change. The real question we should be asking is whether it is worth sacrificing the world’s prosperity in order to ensure US hegemony.
@pugetsoundfarmer2 ай бұрын
No matter who you vote for, you get Victoria Nuland. Horrifying.
@delatroy2 ай бұрын
Vote for an independent
@LeftWingNationalist2 ай бұрын
She was sidelined by the Trump administration due to her role in shaping U.S. policy towards Ukraine during the Obama administration, particularly during the 2014 Ukraine crisis and the EuroMaidan protests. So I gottta give Trump credit for that atleast.
@albertgrant10172 ай бұрын
@@LeftWingNationalistWell stated The USState Department is run by Neo Cons !
@lostferwords56502 ай бұрын
👏👏👏
@jannichi64312 ай бұрын
Russia is NOT an ally of the free world... jeez
@srmathison72 ай бұрын
Professor Sachs is the most intelligent, rational, logical, sane person I have heard talking about American foreign policy. If only our leaders would listen to him.
@onthefarm_48802 ай бұрын
Jeffrey Sachs was recently on Tucker Carlson Podcast. And we had over near 2.5 hours of All Jeffrey Sachs on that podcast. One cannot help but be mesmerized by all that Jeffrey Sachs has to say. This All-In Podcast was NO where near long enough, for we had TWO great minds talking here.
@ThatsnotwhereIparkedmycar2 ай бұрын
Praying Trump calls him up for duty! if he is smart, he will
@Inger-LiseFeaver2 ай бұрын
@@ThatsnotwhereIparkedmycar He would never work for Trump!!
@kaineamachree49452 ай бұрын
, I agree with you 💯
@nomnomyam93792 ай бұрын
john > jeff reality > what we should strive to be
@OsamaAbdElAleemАй бұрын
The information and ideas packed in these 54 minutes are better than hundreds of hours of mainstream media
@dgb56bgd2 ай бұрын
A war with China would be a foolish waste of time, money and precious life. Having lived in China from 2005 - 2022, I know just how lovely the Chinese people are. But, they are a very proud people. A people who have survived for thousands of years, bullied, in the past several hundred years, 6 million Chinese brutally murdered by Japan, the opium wars from UK…etc.
@TacticalMayo2 ай бұрын
It's 100% guaranteed to happen. That's the thing.
@siamcharm79042 ай бұрын
the pentagon has said quietly that a usa invasion of asia would be a suicide mission.
@tooltalk2 ай бұрын
That's what you are missing here.. The CCP starved 40M to death and they still play on the national narrative of the Century of Humilliation to build and justify their military billigerence.
@oostnl2 ай бұрын
Exactly! Having lived in Asia (Singapore) Russia and Europe, I totally agree and this applies to Russian folks as well! Leave each other and we can live in peace for once ❤
@rak62232 ай бұрын
I'm an American expat who has been living in China since 2005 too. you are absolutely correct and I share this sentiment entirely.
@samsaraa20012 ай бұрын
Jeffrey sachs is such a legend! Nobody with his type of extensive experience in foreign policy has the courage to speak the truth about americas intentions abroad the way he does. Just pure straight unadulterated truth! Bravo Jeffrey, bravo!
@jameshegel13242 ай бұрын
Sachs for Secretary of State.
@theprophet4892 ай бұрын
Truth and reality is something that the American brainwashed population just can't accept
@theprophet4892 ай бұрын
@@jameshegel1324never mind secretary of state all the congress is the same he should be secretary or president of the United nations and the ICC people like Victoria nulan and the Clinton's and all them warmongering people in the wh should be
@simpleman55412 ай бұрын
@@jameshegel1324only in our dreams, the interest groups would go to a great length to prevent that from happening if you ask John.
@TacticalMayo2 ай бұрын
@@jameshegel1324He's considered a traitor
@尊壡2 ай бұрын
Mr. Mearsheimer described what America is, while Mr. Sachs explained what America should be.
@dfage332 ай бұрын
mearsheimer advocated extinction of our species. that is it. we are way to technologically powerful now to keep acting like we have in the past.
@Shryce2 ай бұрын
Or any other world power... his has the most viability for humanity.
@birdyashiro12262 ай бұрын
是,好多人就盲喷
@nancycheng43922 ай бұрын
Why does Professor Mearsheimer / US keep bringing up it’s a competition?
@Shryce2 ай бұрын
@@nancycheng4392 Because that's what Capitalism is... an eternal competition to be nr 1. Its a predatory system.
@evatam4393Ай бұрын
Thank Professor Jeffery Sachs. You are the one who can think outside of the box. Nobody wants World War III and definitely not nuclear war.
@Youtubeaccount_8182 ай бұрын
Sacks a real one for having these guys on. All of America needs to watch this
@TacticalMayo2 ай бұрын
Most Americans wouldn't because of Sachs.
@James-hm9on2 ай бұрын
Most Americans will never see this or anything like this because seeing this would expose them to the reality that our world is not what we are lead to believe it is. Demand better .
@rndrecords98322 ай бұрын
Sacks is the true American image I had when i was growing up, not these power hungry and war-mongering mandrils in washington
@enzoh77632 ай бұрын
@@TacticalMayo , Its because people are brainwashed , brainwashed to sacrifice and give their lives to someone , That they doesn't even know that is manipulating them . Brainwashed people are hopeless .
@dwadd75282 ай бұрын
Jeffry is a fool
@neilwolff78942 ай бұрын
The world will be much better if there are more people like Prof. Jeffrey Sachs!
@TacticalMayo2 ай бұрын
We'd all be Communist then
@kalasend2 ай бұрын
The world will be much better if one like Prof. Sachs run for the US president. But then I doubt Americans would vote for someone full of academic talks. It would be anti-American to buy words of a sensible intellect
@napoleonlaguerre55872 ай бұрын
True
@nicholaselliott24842 ай бұрын
@@neilwolff7894 I disagree, though I think he and Mearsheimer are right about being sober to power politics of government administrations. Maybe the US and the West are corrupt and evil, but still less evil than the CCP, seriously. Wake up! I guess we should just let China take Taiwan if they want. Indefensible, doesn’t mean we have to have WWIII like he falsely claim must be the case.
@tuckerbugeater2 ай бұрын
@@ppp123asdf neither are you
@patrickduty77062 ай бұрын
I have lot of respect for Mearsheimer (greatly enjoyed his book "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" and "The Israel Lobby") but Sachs is correct when it comes to China. They don't have to be our enemies; we're foolishly making them our enemies. The U.S. are the antagonists here. John is essentially describing how things are (as one would expect from a realist of his type), Sachs is trying to save the world by describing how things should be. Some might call his optimism foolish, but I see it as a breath of fresh air that could be the off ramp to avoiding nuclear catastrophe.
@nicholaselliott24842 ай бұрын
@@patrickduty7706 would we have a problem with China if they just gave up on their stupid idea of taking back Taiwan. Give me a break.
@jwadaow2 ай бұрын
@@nicholaselliott2484 China needs Taiwan if they want to project power into the Pacific Ocean.
@helloworld73132 ай бұрын
@@nicholaselliott2484you're naive to think US will stop going after China if it stops trying to take back taiwan.
@@nicholaselliott2484 Taiwan will eventually want to become part of china becouse if they don’t they will be used by the US as another proxy like Ukraine.
@mpymelondyАй бұрын
Respect to both. I am impressed by Jeff, True peace champion
@moniruzzamankhan82182 ай бұрын
Excellent Panel. My deep respect for Jeffry Sachs to have courage to speak for the Palestinians. He will be remembered as a legend provided this world survives another hundred years.
@AplusStrategy2 ай бұрын
Strange that he has already forgotten who attacked Israel on October 7 and took hostages...
@MegaAshfire2 ай бұрын
Supporting Palestinians is pretty much the popular opinion.
@mahamadoudiallo5892 ай бұрын
@@AplusStrategy Before October 7, 700,000 settlers were already kicking people out and abusing many others in the west bank where Hamas had no influence. Also, The Israeli government gave power to Hamas as an excuse to take the west bank. Their experiments blew up on them. People like you will learn the hard way I guess.
@ammarsh1002 ай бұрын
@@AplusStrategyno, he’d need another 2 hours to speak on the people robbed of their dignities, lives and homes for the past 75 years. They attacked the entity of israel. No one whos not in the west is surprised oct 7th happened lol
@Tiasung2 ай бұрын
@@MegaAshfire Popular? No. It is however, the ''establishment/system'' opinion. Meaning many (voluntary or influenced) will have that opinion.
@evelyndominguez47572 ай бұрын
It was heartbreaking to hear how desperately Sachs tried to get people to take nuclear war seriously.
@TacticalMayo2 ай бұрын
But it's inevitable. No one's going to stop it. You reached for the crown. It's time to party.
@Mary-f1k8t2 ай бұрын
We're all watching and praying very intently, know that.
@tuckerbugeater2 ай бұрын
@@TacticalMayo seems like an empty threat. if it happens what are you gonna do! Nothing!
@tuckerbugeater2 ай бұрын
@@Mary-f1k8t no bot
@enzoh77632 ай бұрын
@@tuckerbugeater , How about making sure it NEVER will happen.
@svenfeuerbother46812 ай бұрын
Jeffrey Sachs, you’re a the greatest, wisest mind at all. Thank you for standing up for peace all over the world.🙏
@williamweiler2362 ай бұрын
He said a whole lot of nothing. And his whole “strategy” was just weakness/passivity. That is not a way to sustain power
@GregHazel-un2ft2 ай бұрын
Jeff i have to say you ve been always spot on .John some times he seems a bit compemize by the system. we need more voices like yours so we can raise 😢our kids in a peacefull world.
@robertroest76192 ай бұрын
I agree with you. Jeffrey Sachs learned from Mearsheimer, but as a student ultimately surpassed him in my opinion in what the USA should do.
@TacticalMayo2 ай бұрын
He's a traitor
@TacticalMayo2 ай бұрын
@@robertroest7619We will never take Jeffrey's advice.
@DeepztBluАй бұрын
Professor Sachs is a blessing to the world. When this man speaks, everyone, especially those in power, ought to listen.
@tsigeredamulugeta1235Ай бұрын
I agree he sounds like Mother Theresa. The problem is he has a soft heart to dictators of all types. Countries who are suppose to be self sufficient have become dependent because of policies he has been pushing internationally. It seems like seeing into situation through the prism of incremental change which is designed to rather benefit the donator nation or agency. He didn't seem to care about what happening to Ukraine.What about the need to challenge Russia for the invasion of Ukraine? He tend to attack the Dems than Trump or RW, sadly. He is a professor and works as a consultant or so, worth 10 Million dollars. He could be opinionated any day. No country is innocent, but to pile this much S on the US is not fair. The countries he is defending are those who are known to violate human rights. He knows the deal with the UN Security and how it works. I don't agree with him, but in part. Thank you.
@yaphonghor44092 ай бұрын
I agree much much more with the views of Prof Jeffrey!!!
@Dragonbhat2 ай бұрын
Prof Jeff is absolutely right - India will never align with US against China. We don't hate China, don't about the other way around. India doesn't intend to become a super power at least not in the way US or China are or intend to be. We just want to grow to the extent possible. We are not war mongering like the US. We don't see everything with the 'us or not with us' mentality. As long as we have our own government and not a Zelensky like US remote controlled government, we will not side against Russia. We don't love China but we respect China.
@NotClosedMinded2 ай бұрын
same ,although mearsheimer is on many things if not all pretty correct with russia/ukraine and how certain things work on the international stage.
@yaphonghor44092 ай бұрын
@@cyberkant8186 Every person who wants to live in prosperity and peaceful will certainly agree with Prof Jeffrey while John is advocating a sole power center for US which has aggressive and barbaric behavior towards nations not in its control!!! This is a Space Age, not the imperialistic time!
@yaphonghor44092 ай бұрын
@@cyberkant8186 Wouldn't you say as a doctor, prescriptive medicine is much more suitable and it is much more useful for the patient?
@dimiberberu2 ай бұрын
@@cyberkant8186 John has more US blind spots & focuses on political geopolitics (current imperialist POWER). Jeffrey has better cultural understanding (fundamental for collective alignment), so he is better strategist & visionary. Both have some Western (individualistic) limiting beliefs ;)
@JingbaoHu-bu3ci2 ай бұрын
John typically stands with American interest, but Jeffry stands with mankind.
@catinbootsnow42672 ай бұрын
In a community, John is for the mafia boss, while Jeffrey is for the whole neighborhood.
@xuwang80172 ай бұрын
不是,jeffry也是站在美国利益立场上的
@svetlana79042 ай бұрын
I do not like John... he is acting
@Bamboodonutz2 ай бұрын
John stands with global interests by publicly stating over and over that the US is its own worst enemy when it maintains its imperial overreach.
@stfrequency2 ай бұрын
This
@cemocanish2 ай бұрын
You guys have stepped up on a totally different level. Well done All-In.
@whendays6592 ай бұрын
The hosts were shockingly misinformed, but at least they had Sachs on to offer some pushback on their usual nonsense. I give them credit for that.
@zhenyuxia76652 ай бұрын
Good talk, but too theoretical in my opinion. China is already a regional hegemon. It's already roaming freely in all of Asia and Latin America, and roaming towards Europe.
@shuilong522 ай бұрын
@@zhenyuxia7665 this is a slight difference, China roaming freely is not forced, it is welcomed and accepted by most of the country in this region. The country that is creating chaos is ignoring the fact that their claim of the territory are also claimed by several countries. These countries chosed to work and resolved peacefully.
@JD-im4wu2 ай бұрын
@@whendays659 F-Sachs CCP shill selling us out for $ we Love John M all the way True Realist and Patriot!
@JD-im4wu2 ай бұрын
Tuche, BUT what to do with all these CHINA CCP Bots / Agents in comment section?, its getting out of hand they are twisting the story and muddying the waters too much in comments section
@thecrazyrooster7295Ай бұрын
Professor Sachs, amazing, realistic, and honest .I am such a fan. Love you.
@johndole93812 ай бұрын
28:00. I agree with Professor Sachs 100%. China is NOT a threat to the US. Nobody is going to attack the US. I love Professor Sachs and I'd love to meet and hear him speak in person.... 😊😊😊
@ehhalexx2 ай бұрын
Cyber security folks would strongly disagree. China is constantly meddling in western affairs digitally and through spies. Yes, we do the same but it would be wise to continually watch them carefully
@frankcolumbo44812 ай бұрын
The US has been attacking, invading and bullying china since the first and second opium wars 200 years ago.
@cyansadventures2 ай бұрын
I feel that as Sach's pointed out, Mearsheimer's logic is flawed in a world with MAD doctrine. I think China would be willing to risk nukes to preserve its independence. But China is not willing to risk nukes to encroach on the US's doorstep. Right now with Mearsheimer's logic, he seems to think that NOT containing China would cause an existential threat to the US, as opposed to Sachs pointing out that the only thing that could hurt the US now, are nukes, which can only come from threatening China's existence by lining its doorstep with US military bases.
@LIfeSavingFlame2 ай бұрын
that's the joke, the biggest tyrant in the world is the usa
@tofatofa4722 ай бұрын
People are wrong to compare China’s rise today to its distant past. Modern China is emerging in a world built by the West-shaped by nuclear power, global economies, and technology that ancient empires couldn’t imagine. China won’t act like its old self. It adopted Marxism, a Western idea, and made it core to its system. This alone shows China isn’t locked into some "distinct" or "different" thinking. Common sense says it won’t tear down the Western-built system-it’ll tweak it and take the lead. The idea that Chinese or Asian thinking is fundamentally different from Western thinking is weak. This isn’t East vs. West-it’s human nature. From the Ashanti in Africa to the Polynesians in Tonga to China’s Warring States, they all followed the same power logic as Rome or Britain. Power isn’t Western, it’s universal. Mearsheimer’s view of China and the U.S. reflects how humans behave in power: fear, pride, greed, ruthlessness. China will act like any great power-because that’s what great powers do. Here’s a thought experiment: Do you see BYD or Huawei retreating? Do you see China backing down to U.S. pressure? Or companies you’ve worked for-CEOs, managers-doing anything but maximizing influence and power? What’s so difficult and controversial to understand here? And that’s the world we live in. The real problem? 80 years of peace and prosperity, largely built by the U.S., has created weak minds that have forgotten the brutal nature of power. Just like how junk food companies-born in that same peaceful world-left people with soft bodies, the West has grown soft in understanding what power really is.
@PositiveLifer2 ай бұрын
Jefferey Sachs is an American hero for speaking his mind and sharing his Wisdom.
@janemfeng2 ай бұрын
professor Sachs is also one of the best decent human beings. Couldn’t love him more❤
@JD-im4wu2 ай бұрын
...BUT John Mearsheimer is the undefeated GOAT of war strategy. His heart is with him but his mind is not on China.
@wangjacob-pq8nl2 ай бұрын
John is realistic, Sachs is nerdy。
@JD-im4wu2 ай бұрын
@@wangjacob-pq8nl yea china bots have taken over the channel again clearly, they have gotten better with their grammar using ai
@tocreatee35852 ай бұрын
@@janemfeng but arrogant, Jeffry thinks what he BELIEVES are more important than what actually IS.
@christinekober51592 ай бұрын
A great, historical and important conversation!!! Jeffrey Sachs is a hero in his field and the world is blessed to have him! I agree with his points of view. God bless these guys! Thank you!🙏
@johnlundnyvang282 ай бұрын
There is no God, stop foolling yourself. 😮
@christinekober51592 ай бұрын
@@johnlundnyvang28 God bless you!
@QualityPenАй бұрын
@@johnlundnyvang28Wow, I’m so glad you came here to enlighten us. No other atheist has ever expressed this sentiment to us online before. You’re so unique and thoughtful to share this, and you must be immensely intelligent, far more intelligent than all other humans combined, to know all the secrets of the universe, including where it all came from and whether there are any metaphysical levels to existence. Good thing you’ve been able to rise above your limited human senses and capacity for reason and knowledge to come to such an important and unquestionable conclusion, and say with no reservation that you know everything and there can be no God.
@lynthАй бұрын
6:30 The Great Criminal Jeffrey Sachs - who is directly responsible for condemning millions to death with his anti-socialist reforms - muses about being aware of the fascist deep state of the United States since the early 1990s. Maybe if he had listened to the socialists of the Soviet Union - who understood how the US operates for many decades before his birth and were having to deal with it since the 1940s - he wouldn't have served the US empire but helped the USSR defend itself against the very deep state and capitalist ideology that the US always represented. The US never changed. He just gained a little bit of understanding (but he never bothered to truly understand the evil of capitalism and the United States, he still believes it's "a few rotten apples" causing problems, instead of understanding that all problems he's identifying are inherent to the inhuman system he supports). Every third rate socialist analyst from the 20th century had deeper insights and more interesting things to say than him, yet nobody ever listened to them. Least of all people like Jeffrey Sachs who has only barely begun catching up and recognizing his mistakes.
@arnbrandy11 күн бұрын
What a wonderful panel! Besides their vast knowledge, insightfulness and eloquence, Mearsheimer and Sachs show immense integrity. I loved to see they disagreeing, challenging each other. They deserve much more reach than they have.
@rosamariagalvan4652 ай бұрын
Professor Jeffrey Sachs is always excellent and really inspiring to listen to.
@sharathiyer63662 ай бұрын
The Americans have forgotten about United Nations. If UN is not powerful make it one. Unless multilateral institutions are strengthened this debate will go on. On the question of India and China the experts have forgotten that India is a democracy whereas china is not.
@JWscandiАй бұрын
@@sharathiyer6366 ur last sentence was load of Western brainwashed definition aligned to the US foreign policy. India is indeed "Western practiced" democracy while China is functionally is Representative Democracy (just like how democracy works in political parties in the West) BUT meritocracy as the benchmark yardstick of qualification. Demonising China as dictatorship is simply the US hegemonic foreign policy to stop anyone from rising. This is truly MONSTROUS!
@syang7775Ай бұрын
@@sharathiyer6366 Ironically, China has successfully lifted its population out of poverty while the "democratic" India simply cannot. The term of democracy has been misinterpreted and controversy. It should not be used as the only standard in determining good or bad of a political system. By the way, India is becoming increasingly undemocratic under Modi's administration.
@Lakersman24Ай бұрын
@@syang7775Don’t forget in the early seventies the US open up China with many billions of foreign direct investment, along with many others, allowing for China to establish an investment base to grow what it has today. India doesn’t have such a heavy investment base. China was right place right time.
@syang7775Ай бұрын
@@Lakersman24 Whose fault is it? Just ask people who have invested in India. Perhaps the Japanese as a start. The country is a dark hole. It does not understand the importance of credibility and mutual benefiting. The bureaucracy, a long tradition of India, loves to play games. And you don't want me to get started on the subjects of bribery and corruptions.
@jlpowell512 ай бұрын
John describes the world we live in, Jeffrey describes the world rational people want to live in.
@TacticalMayo2 ай бұрын
Rational people?
@tsuikr2 ай бұрын
@TacticalMayo yes, real human with sentiment !
@johndiana52762 ай бұрын
So true
@shadowboyii2 ай бұрын
I think his background as an economist set up the way he see the world through the money vains that runs largely by rational people and more in a rational direction. John was a soldier he knows the flaws of the chain of command and can extrapolate that on a government state
@chriswong91582 ай бұрын
Understand, John want the USA to go to war with China PRC next.... and Jeffrey said, nuts !@!
@AlRadmanesh-bk9uv2 ай бұрын
Jeffrey, you’re a real peacemaker.. Thank you.. 🙏🙏🙏
@YCHTT2 ай бұрын
It's very obvious that all the 5 speakers were trying their hardest to get some anti-China grants (if they aren't on the payroll already). Jeffrey was the only adult up there,
@58Galtha2 ай бұрын
Jeffrey is NOT a peacemaker. He made some good points. But his 2 State solution for Gaza and Israel makes NO sense. He seems to be in the pocket of The UN. I like the fact that he want's peace. But peace at any cost is what led to WW2. The fact that he doesn't know that is very disturbing.
@lavendereucalyptus32252 ай бұрын
Indeed, principled and consistent. Jeffrey Sachs is principled and consistent. He is a hero for peace and humanity, 🙏🙏🙏
@lavendereucalyptus32252 ай бұрын
@@58Galtha “ But peace at any cost is what led to WW2. The fact that he doesn't know that is very disturbing. “ Wars at any cost will lead to annihilation of nuclear WW3. Jeffery Sachs is not a person of ‘peace at any cost’, he believed war is only necessary after exhausting all diplomatic efforts, exactly what Russia has done before its SMO in Ukraine.
@RedFrog-k8y2 ай бұрын
@@58Galthapeace is not what caused WW2, what a distorted version of history. Are you unfamiliar with Woodrow Wilson’s handling of the Treaty of Versailles? How can you possibly say that the second half of world war 1 was a time of peace?
@leishen4551Ай бұрын
We need more people like doctor Sachs for sure !
@normanvanrooy31132 ай бұрын
I’ve followed both of these great men for years. Definitely feel that Sachs is the wiser mind and heart.
@pauligwedibia97832 ай бұрын
If you are an idealist. Mearsheimer calls it as is.
@ProdigalExplorer2 ай бұрын
@@pauligwedibia9783 whereas mearsheimer paints a picture of nuclear holocaust with no solution, a fatalist
@zarbins2 ай бұрын
@@pauligwedibia9783 If you area realist.
@siamcharm79042 ай бұрын
i have followed sachs since he was a junior fellow. at harvard
@Natalie-tf1ze2 ай бұрын
@@siamcharm7904does he have twitter? Gonna go and follow him
@peterretep10102 ай бұрын
Jeff is such a treasure to not only the US, but the world. If everyone is like jeff, we wouldnt have bad conflicts.
@jeebuskАй бұрын
right, you wouldn't have just bad conflicts... you would have worse than bad conflicts.
@VivianKreimerАй бұрын
Spot on. ❤ GREAT PROF SACHS
@PeaceMatters20012 ай бұрын
This is the most important discussion about geopolitics to date, everyone must listen! Jeff is outstanding! He is the “National Treasure” of the world for “Peace and Prosperity”!
@slllllll534Ай бұрын
Highest respect for prof Sachs
@VV-sn3fh2 ай бұрын
I agree with Jeffrey 100%. People need to understand history and the real facts and reasons why America intervenes countries..
@WilkinsMichael2 ай бұрын
True but also they need to understand that other countries like China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia... don't have pure intentions either.
@curtiszyr2 ай бұрын
@@WilkinsMichael that’s the point. No hood guys but only one side is painted as good people need to unlearn the brain washing. The country that preach the most about peace happens to be the only country that has used nuclear weapons on human population and continues to test nuclear weapons destroying lives of islanders with radiation poisoning. Toppling governments installing puppets , Concentrations camps , genocide , you name it things this country has done and continues to do but still gets painted as good guys
@nexxogen2 ай бұрын
@@WilkinsMichael Yes, but when they've shown the desire for peace and cooperation, they were rejected by the US.
@dnn322 ай бұрын
@@WilkinsMichaelthose are assumptions made by the u.s to justify their aggressive actions around the world. As jeffrey Sachs, let's compete with them economically in a healthy manner. China building african infrastructures and having economic ties with the developed world is a bad thing for those people while they absolutely don't do anything abt it, but only provoke wars and violence.
@liulaolao72692 ай бұрын
Zheng He, a Chinese admiral in the 1400's, commanded seven naval expeditions covering Vietnam, Siam, Malacca and Java and Ceylon. 62 ships and 27,800 men in the fleet. Not a single place was colonized nor looted.
@psyberking2 ай бұрын
Drr Jeffrey Sacks is at trhe height of his brilliance and eloquence here, outshining even the formidable J. Mearsheimer. Bravo!
@nicholaselliott24842 ай бұрын
@@psyberking “height of brilliance and eloquence ”, “formidable J Mearsheimer”, “Bravo”. Do yourself a favor and read your comments out loud, what a phony way to speak. Mearsheimer and Sachs make some valid points about the inherent desire for power of governments, but Sachs is basically a CCP apologist.
@benoitguillou31462 ай бұрын
Except where he said he has no clue besides Sarkozy not liking Khaddafi why "we" went to war with Lybia ...It was OBVIOUSLY to make the migrant and slave trade locker country which was lybia explode .....So Europe could have it's social system flooded and bankrupted by tsunamis of migrants , to ease of the liberlisation of Europe , and to permit a huge influx of canon fodder ready for the coming war with Russia ......But Sachs is a huge limited hangout and obviously he hasn't been given "clearance" to say that out loud
@DDDarkz2 ай бұрын
@@nicholaselliott2484 CIA shills has joined the chat
@psyberking2 ай бұрын
@@nicholaselliott2484 So please enlighten us. Show us your rational arguments in support of your claims. Engaging in name calling such as "phony", "CCP", "shills" is baboon-speak and a denial of the rational discourse we should be having as human beings.
@eemoogee1602 ай бұрын
@@nicholaselliott2484what a disappointing comment
@arifin19542 ай бұрын
Prof Jeff Sachs , you are amazingly correct and your magic words regarding a reliable livable world for all is our only future. Please continue your efforts to help mankind. Our greatest regards and respect for you.
@sharathiyer63662 ай бұрын
The Americans have forgotten about United Nations. If UN is not powerful make it one. Unless multilateral institutions are strengthened this debate will go on. On the question of China and India the experts have forgotten that India is a democracy whereas china is not.
@willdon.127929 күн бұрын
@@sharathiyer6366 Sadly, the UN has been wrecked by the dictatorships so beloved of John and Jeffrey.
@kiwitrainguy4 күн бұрын
@@willdon.1279 And the UN has ignored by the US and Israel.
@hsiaoguh2232Ай бұрын
Five against one. Prof. Sachs prevailed in analyses and knowledge.
@elgarxu96362 ай бұрын
I love the two great thinkers. IMHO their great differences root in where they stand. John stands for America, and Jeff stands for world. I am with Jeff.
@einerus2 ай бұрын
One is for a world order, and the other is for world disorder with empires clashing all the time.
@Mary-f1k8t2 ай бұрын
He is of an older generation and that ideology is fading away into the bin of history with the hopes that all countries can have safe drinking water, enough food to feed it's citizens, heat and electricity and even Internet, hence, peace. Not too much to ask.
@robrob90502 ай бұрын
But good America working for peace benefits also world too.
@GingerPeacenik2 ай бұрын
John is for maintaining power for a handful of American Oligarchs, Jeffery is for is for the survival and betterment of humanity and the world.
@unconform812 ай бұрын
👏
@verasinn92852 ай бұрын
Thank you Professor Sachs for being patient, talking in the face of so much headwinds of ignorance. America will always be lost in ignorance if platforms such as this don’t take understanding the world more seriously. Mouthing ignorance and factually incorrect opinions is dangerous. And irresponsible for the peace of the world
@noellaw34772 ай бұрын
Well put!
@BrianButterworth-s4z2 ай бұрын
You just made a statment supporting censorship. The anedote to bad speech is more speech.
@FreeCrashFlowАй бұрын
Are they not creating a platform for him to speak?..platforms such as this???
@cosmoray9750Ай бұрын
House passes $1.6 billion to deliver anti-China propaganda overseas " HR 1157
@gigiamar1407Ай бұрын
It is deeply concerning when someone as intelligent and influential as Professor Sachs advances narratives that misrepresent the nature of Israel’s actions and intentions. His suggestion that Prime Minister Netanyahu is attempting to pull America into a war with Iran is not only dangerous but also fundamentally misleading. Israel, since its establishment in 1948, has been under constant threat, facing relentless attacks fueled by anti-Semitic rhetoric and violence. The October 7 assault by Hamas was immediately followed by threats and attacks from Hezbollah, with Iran openly supporting these actions. Israel is not seeking to drag the U.S. into a conflict but is defending itself against existential threats, as Iran and its proxies repeatedly call for its destruction. Iran’s “Death to America” chants and longstanding hostility towards the West are well-documented, and to downplay this reality is to ignore the grave threat posed not only to Israel but to all Western nations. Sachs’ dismissive attitude, coupled with the smugness of someone who believes they know better, is indeed alarming. He seems disconnected from the real-world stakes, while Israel is fighting not just for its own survival but for the security of the entire Western world. These scholars may impress each other in academic panels, but their disconnect from the harsh realities of global conflict renders their views dangerously out of touch. I am frustrated with the rhetoric of Professor Jeffrey Sachs, as such narratives not only frighten me but also risk gaslighting and furthering division and misunderstanding. My frustration extends beyond disappointment, as it frightens me due to the potential for these narratives to gaslight the public, creating further division and misunderstanding.
@vittyli47422 ай бұрын
I respect Prof. Sachs and all his views. He has a deep unstanding about China!
@georgesibley71522 ай бұрын
in one sense true but what he does not point out is that China does not think the same way as the West. If challenged they will fight but they prefer a win-win situation. They have several border disputes but most have been and are being sorted by Diplomay. The SCS was not the problem until The USA returned and convinced the Philippines to kick Chinese infrastructure out and become aggressive. AS for China's harassment it is obvious that people have not studied it, The Philippines have sunk and killed more fishermen and boats than China has. The US funded the UNCLOS decision, and at least two judges completely changed their minds from previous articles on what constitutes an Island. Nor did the agreement challenge any country's right to the features (including China).
@lisakong86512 ай бұрын
and more importantly...a genuine human being who cares
@valetudo15692 ай бұрын
I disagree
@tomtube10122 ай бұрын
Sachs is more honest and tells it straight. Sachs is true pro-peace. Mearsheimer is not.
@tomtube10122 ай бұрын
Sachs wants world peace. Mearsheimer wants peace with Russia so we can concentrate on China.
@VR_JPNАй бұрын
One of the most important conversations I've ever heard.
@userngo09.02bmo2 ай бұрын
Only Sachs thinks outside the American exceptionalism box.
@calicocat82132 ай бұрын
Interestingly, he was Masako Owada's (current Empress of Japan) thesis advisor at Harvard.
@Angeprof2 ай бұрын
That’s prudence for you.
@Catcatcat2372 ай бұрын
He also seems to be the one who’s actually able to listen. The libs in the room seem to have really hard time with that. Constantly jumping out of their pants to interrupt the speaker.
@df-kg4yu2 ай бұрын
@@Catcatcat237that's not libs, rather racist imperialists, they destroyed the word liberalism as many others.😅
@Catcatcat2372 ай бұрын
@@df-kg4yu nooo, you don’t understand. They are the world saviors who simply MUST step in when «dictatorships» invade «free» countries.
@emysaavedra87342 ай бұрын
Jeffrey Sachs is the best, he speaks with reason and just, a man of integrity and intelligence like Jeffrey Sachs is one in a million, a courageous man who advocate for peace for the entire world 🌍🙏
@WalterHelm-vv5sdАй бұрын
Agree❤
@askeladd60Ай бұрын
He is too naive
@LANFAN1107Ай бұрын
@@askeladd60John is too naive
@richardnunn1958Ай бұрын
Prof sachs is a world treasure 💯
@veejay412 ай бұрын
Wow, Thank you Mr. Jeffery Sachs for speaking truth with so much conviction. 🙏
@hermesliteratus8822 ай бұрын
Sadly, the moderators are a bunch of fools who wouldn't even let him speak.
@mikhailfranco2 ай бұрын
Sachs is wrong on almost everything. He's a globalist appeaser bureaucrat.
@moregilbertoАй бұрын
The moderator is so awful. Fell into the trap of thinking anyone gives a shit about his perspective.
@olgastrnadova5843Ай бұрын
@@moregilberto I am from the Czech Republic ( Europe). Used to be and still are the victim of Playground . The First the Second world war. Immature US politics. Always the same. Foreign policy Is a disaster.
@bryanping13292 ай бұрын
You are the man prof Sachs thank you much love ❤
@jvs3332 ай бұрын
Absolutely agree 100% ❤❤prof Sachs 👍👍
@fffwe38762 ай бұрын
jeffry was having tantrum😂😂😂😂
@jvs3332 ай бұрын
@@fffwe3876 he kept his cool despite being surrounded with 5 American zealous Zionist wanting to cling to a past gone era. Sachs was the only one talking about todays reality not spouting US 20th century halcyon days gone by. Russia will win in Europe (Ukraine) Iran will win in Middle East (Israel) China will win in West (US) Welcome to the 21st century (BRICS)
@sharathiyer63662 ай бұрын
The Americans have forgotten about United Nations. If UN is not powerful make it one. Unless multilateral institutions are strengthened this debate will go on. On the question of China and India the experts have forgotten that India is a democracy whereas china is not.
@sharathiyer63662 ай бұрын
@@fffwe3876The Americans have forgotten about United Nations. If UN is not powerful make it one. Unless multilateral institutions are strengthened this debate will go on. On the question of China and India the experts have forgotten that India is a democracy whereas china is not.
@Sunnyday-snow2 ай бұрын
This panel is a perfect stage for the performance of a great American VS a great human being. I show my deepest gratitude to Mr Sachs for his profound view in America’s geopolitical politics. It is never about democracy or humility, it is everything about maintaining the power so we can bully everyone on this planet however we want.
@hanhgoldman2 ай бұрын
Sadly we are groomed into believe since young that "There is only one God and only my God is true God. " we are God chosen people. and if you are not with us then you must be going against us , and we have the God given duty to share the good news to convert you into our image ... " Such a self centered, self righteous , binary , and intrusive view toward others can't be any worse.
@sirrys2 ай бұрын
@@hanhgoldman Mearsheimer’s point has nothing to do with nationalism or religion. Clearly you two have not listened to the debate otherwise you wouldn’t put forth this shallow claim
@WideAwakeHuman2 ай бұрын
@@hanhgoldmanyou severely misunderstood it - the statement they believe is that “I am God” not that there is an almighty being outside themselves.
@JingbaoHu-bu3ci2 ай бұрын
democracy and humility are only tools for them.
@JingbaoHu-bu3ci2 ай бұрын
@@sirrys Does he want to maintain the hegemony of American? if so what that? why China and other country cannot grow up? why the world should listen to usa?
@DataBeachАй бұрын
2 legendary minds on the same stage. I couldn't have imagined this was possible. Respect.
@tiffanytran57122 ай бұрын
Thank you professor Sachs! Majority of humanity thinks like you!!
@iqbang92362 ай бұрын
Yet we know his thoughts hinder the plans of the Deep State. . .
@ottodashpppАй бұрын
We have to understand that Mearsheimer is not the great Henry Kissinger
@tgsgardenmaintenance46272 ай бұрын
Shifting trade from China to India, will just create the same issue, but in a different country! As for dictators, forcing the world to bend to your demands, makes the US the biggest dictators on the planet!!! John is a wise man, but Jeff won this debate hands down! Notice that these two intelligent men, can disagree with each other, and still be friends. It's called diplomacy!!! The US should try it some time!!!
@iyke4djakes2 ай бұрын
They arrive at the same conclusions using different approaches. Its more of a learning class than a debate
@greatharmony26692 ай бұрын
Mearsheimer assume USA should and is capable of stopping the rise of China. He didn't answer this question: what will happen if USA is not capable to stop the rise of China? Triggering a war and drag China into it? Does USA still has the industrial capability to win a WWIII?
@chrislui5712 ай бұрын
Learn about the international supply chain, then you will realize it is not a "just let X country copy-and-paste China then problem solved".
@ChrisZ9012 ай бұрын
US is no longer the engine for the world economy as it was post WW2 all the way to post cold war. China is now the biggest trade partner with the majority of countries. What happened between US and China cannot be replicate as China no longer relies on the US. Especially now with the all the sanctions China is forced to become self sufficient in high tech sector and in a few years US companies will completely lose its competitive advantage is high value added sectors.
@deliobaoduzzi64502 ай бұрын
You're perfectly right ! China was made so powerful by the usa and they're doing the exact thing to india . I agree that at a certain point all nations must level up to each other ,it's the only way . The usa need to change attitude
@guatony45312 ай бұрын
Jeffery Sachs is a representative of the American conscience. He is based on facts and human conscience. Very few Americans think in this way now.
@rebeccasu4460Ай бұрын
He is a representative of Chinese communist party.😂
@JackC-e6iАй бұрын
conscience is what the Philippines have in the South China Seas with China right now
@UncleCАй бұрын
@@rebeccasu4460 You are right to say that. Except for Americans, the whole world knows that the Chinese Communist Party is the only one which working hard for world peace, while the United States is the opposite. It is an honor for him who advocates peace to represent the Communist Party.
@UncleCАй бұрын
@@JackC-e6i In addition to spoken English, you can also learn more history.
@JackC-e6iАй бұрын
@@UncleC Such a petty remark. weak. I am just proving Mearsheimer's ideas are more viable at this time.
@frankmerriwell8339Ай бұрын
Jeff's perception on the US is basically how people outside of the country see it all these years. It's a good thing an American says it out loud about the US being hypocritical. A truth that's hard to swallow for some audience but much more precious than any sugar-coated idealistic lies.
@Rick-or2kqАй бұрын
He mentions in one of these panels, that everyone in a position of influence in Washington should a get passport and travel a little, see the world understand how others think, get out of the box of the beltway.
@GeokEngYeoh2 ай бұрын
Full respect and admiration for Prof Sachs who speaks with wisdom. You are a great man.
@sharathiyer63662 ай бұрын
The Americans have forgotten about United Nations. If UN is not powerful make it one. Unless multilateral institutions are strengthened this debate will go on. On the question of China and India the experts have forgotten that India is a democracy whereas china is not.
@szolanekАй бұрын
True.... while he doesn't consider a bit the war they already started, was called "operation pandemic". It was just a prelude. This way, attacking Russia makes all sense. For what they are working on is to completely destroy the whole world. It's easy. Just pull the dollar and stop Chinese trade. It's game over. .... except if Russia supply China. The US was working hard for decades to shrink their economy to one third, and still making 80% of the world's GDP. But it can't be done if Russia stands They want aristocracy and slavery with tokenization and digital currency. Well, we will see what happens, for I don't believe nukes exist. Just don't.
@gigiamar1407Ай бұрын
Where you see wisdom I see fear and cowardice
@jchanmcseАй бұрын
@@gigiamar1407 It takes wisdom to see wisdom, perhaps that's what you are lacking!
@hunterornotАй бұрын
@@gigiamar1407Not everyone understands what wisdom is.
@Darkvader4012 ай бұрын
Professor Sachs is a brilliant man and he see things through. He is absolutely correct.
@askeladd60Ай бұрын
No he is too naive
@caregivergirlk2 ай бұрын
A ONCE IN A LIFETIME OPPORTUNITY ! The All In with two GREAT THINKERS. Those 2 guests may be the ONLY chance for the Americans, and the rest of us in the world, to find out what the MSM is forbidden to share. They gave a couple of clear explanations of who/what is hindering any peace initiatives. Thankyou
@AmrHussein18052 ай бұрын
Exactly 👍
@shanhuichen22522 ай бұрын
Well said. I 💯% agree 👍
@hollyambrose2292 ай бұрын
Dynamic duo
@simpleman55412 ай бұрын
The sad news is the interest groups would go out of great length to prevent anyone like them from ever be elected in any meaningful position.
@BhutanBluePoppy2 ай бұрын
@@simpleman5541 since power does corrupt, I’d say keep out if politics and fight for freedom of speech. Our Founders knew how Imperialists work and the Constitution puts it in writing.
@westalwayslose4herowarsАй бұрын
In the long history of 4,000+ years, China has gone through many ups and downs. Historically, ancient China (Han, Tang, Song, Ming, Qing) once was the world's No1 power many times. In history, ancient China (the Three Kingdoms, the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms, the partition of the North and South Dynasties, the late Qing Dynasty, and the Republic of China during the period of Japanese aggression, etc.) also fell to a very low position at one time or another. China has never been hysterical and biting others like a madman for being ranked 2nd, 3rd or lower. China bounced back every time. Unlike the Western powers, China tends to rebound by unifying its own territory and rarely expands or colonizes other countries. Now China is once again in the path of returning its pinnacle of history. China has a peaceful mind with these historical fluctuations. Because China is a mature civilization that is able to view changes in the power rankings of its countries with equanimity. The United States is very jealous of China's progress. The United States is a sad little country with a history of 200+ years. The United States has been No 1 in the world only once, for a total of less than 100 years. The United States cannot afford to lose. The United States is a country that cannot accept defeat in competition. it is impossible for a country to be No 1 power forever. China can't, USA can't, no country can. it is naïve to pursue all-time No 1. USA need grow up from a giant baby.
@steveyeem2 ай бұрын
We love you for your great honesty Professor Sachs.Thank for great insights from the forum guests. Peace to all as always.
@patrickhing1055Ай бұрын
I agree, his intelligence supersedes all present at the meeting
@dianehong12172 ай бұрын
Sacks is so on point as always.
@tuckerbugeater2 ай бұрын
not even once
@shrayesraman51922 ай бұрын
David or Jeffrey?
@reo522 ай бұрын
Particularly when it comes to China.
@WW3_Soon2 ай бұрын
Sachs
@Leoq-zk6wt2 ай бұрын
both prof. are great minds, and I'm with Prof. Sacks 100%!
@kamaurahamukti59199 күн бұрын
what an extraordinary moment in time witnessing those two brilliant human beings in such rich, truthful conversation. Deepest gratitude to all who made it happen and posted it here. Thank you from Kenya 🙏🏽🇰🇪
@oksanareggi80082 ай бұрын
John and Jeff - the best contemporary thinkers alive! Love both, but agree with Jeff.
@dwadd75282 ай бұрын
Jeffrey Sachs is not
@adamgates11422 ай бұрын
@dwadd7528 Make a point
@jibsmokestack12 ай бұрын
John is not!
@abdoulayeguigma33782 ай бұрын
There id a another one but he is french us name us Todd Emmanuel.he us far more wise.
@ishan19202 ай бұрын
Notes for serious listeners: 1. The key differences between Mearsheimer & Sachs are about power vs economics. Economics prefers positive sum games. Power prefers zero sum games. 2. Mearsheimer thinks conflict is inevitable given the regional hegemon that's the US. If you are the biggest baddest bully on the street, you'll be threatened by a challenger and work to contain it. Sachs however, believes this kind of thinking gets us closer to the brink of nuclear war and should be halted.
@Alex-ig2xr2 ай бұрын
Based on the behavior of the US government, we are doomed.
@eriklondon29462 ай бұрын
1. While I like the high level hypothesis that economics is a positive sum game, this is a false way of looking at it. Thus, why there is the idea of "economic warfare". It was not a "positive sum game" to all the Midwest who the billionaire auto owner class decided to outsource all of their labor to other sources of cheap labor. In the 1970's It would have been better to have pushed much more into robotics to manufacture domestically. To be fair its always easy to judge history 50 years later... 2. While I agree with this idea of holding nuclear war as a concern, MAD is still a thing. And given how excessively hostile the CCP has been to the Filipinos over the last 5 years, with numbers of increasing ships, they are pushing hostility all over. Also the CCP is the King of playing the victim when they are ramming and sinking Filipino ships, that are 20 miles off of the coast of the Philippines. That's +500 miles away from China. It sounds like they are pushing into the Malaysian and Indian waters too to attempt to control the pathways of oil too. Also China alone currently produces 50% of all ships in the whole world....
@EdwinTan-ci6ru2 ай бұрын
@@eriklondon2946do you know why ccp policy again philiphine and vietnam ( and other asean country) is diff even they got same issues? one calling big gun the other using diplomatic skill.
@eriklondon29462 ай бұрын
@@EdwinTan-ci6ru I can't understand your engrish CCP Spy. Go away.
@dannychan13422 ай бұрын
If US thinks it is the best country in anything, why are afraid of competing fairly and squarely!
@Reccc2 ай бұрын
What a great Sacks! Look at this debate; he stands alone against everyone else, seeking peace rather than power and war.
@AnkitSaini-k8j4xАй бұрын
Thank you for bringing 2 great men in to debate!
@organizer142 ай бұрын
The difference is that Jeffrey understands China better than others. Thank goodness!
@dunzhen2 ай бұрын
John believes ALL countries would act like Anglo Saxons if they were in their shoes. I believe China as a civilization and society is fundamentally different and wouldn't be hellbent on meddling with others. China is just inwards focused, no one can change these forces that make it this way
@marcomongke31162 ай бұрын
@dunzhen I am probably biased because of my countries location and history. But to me, China seem like expansionist, and Russia is like a protective alliance. I am from Mongolia. But judging from the actions of NATOs in the last decade both Russia and China seem like angels in comparison.
@GODLIMIT2 ай бұрын
USA became a hegemon due to very distinct and unique historical circumstances. It is highly unlikely that any nation would ever dominate the world the way USA has over the last 150 years or so, especially in an emerging multi-polar world.
@TacticalMayo2 ай бұрын
He's a Self-Proclaimed wumao 🤣
@dunzhen2 ай бұрын
@@marcomongke3116 That's fair. I think Anglo Saxon empires really put it into perspective how much worse China could be. I just won't accept hearing this from a Westerner...honestly. Unfortunately everyone lets them get away speaking from some moral highground
@mevech2 ай бұрын
Please invite them to the all in podcast and get more time and deeper dive!
@carlosoviedo56852 ай бұрын
yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@sacamain02 ай бұрын
Naah, the moderators are quite manipulative. But Sachs already gives a weekly interview on judge napolitano's yourube channel
@alexkonovalov2 ай бұрын
@@sacamain0 so does Mearsheimer, Col. Douglas McGregor and several other notable speakers. Highly recommend judge's channel
@sacamain02 ай бұрын
@@alexkonovalov i know 😊 make sure to watch Max Blumenthal
@salimaddi1513Ай бұрын
John Mearsheimer is a great human too and cares about others! Go watch his interviews on Judge Napolitano where he hammers Israelis for their war crimes against the Palestinians and he advocate for US not to side with Israel against Palestinians
@pootieputin27712 ай бұрын
The guy on the far left of the stage is clueless... he should have read Mearsheimer's and Sach's books prior to this important session.
@CatPDX2 ай бұрын
Clueless, and without good manners.
@gengxinsu53562 ай бұрын
He is behind on everything, even on information.
@GODLIMIT2 ай бұрын
He is annoyingly clueless. His wilfully ignorant and bigoted notions about China reflect the majority brainwashed mindset of his fellow countrymen.
@punisher60632 ай бұрын
He gets his info from CNN and NYT. Consumer of nonsense spews nonsense.
@lindenlee37052 ай бұрын
And extremely arrogant too!
@SA-oc2kwАй бұрын
Two of our time’s greatest minds for sure! I always enjoy listening to them.
@winkstorm2 ай бұрын
100% fully agreed with Jeff. 2/3 with John. JM is so wrong on China.
@calicocat82132 ай бұрын
Exactly. "Understanding" actually means what it says: standing under. Putting oneself in the other side's shoes, forgetting your stereotypes and prejudices, and trying to understand the other side's way of reasoning and MO.
@kwokholuk87232 ай бұрын
agree! I think John have never been to China before.
@philipmulville82182 ай бұрын
JM also wrong on Russia. Undoubtedly a learned man, if badly mistaken on Russia, and has been for years.
@fightignorance35982 ай бұрын
John is not wrong because it is his real belief that US should contain China so she always remain poor and subservient to the US
@Bamboodonutz2 ай бұрын
@@philipmulville8218 What are his errors regarding Russia?
@ArielVisionary2 ай бұрын
We are in a paradigm shift from geopolitics to geoeconomics, which China is leading. The way forward to continued prosperity for Americans is to cooperate with China instead of competing. That means shifting ideas about power seeking or being a ruthless hegemon. I agree with Jeffrey Sachs that China is not a threat to the U.S. We are all threatened by nuclear war. Yes, our mindset leads us to this brink. We can change our mindset. It's feasible. And I appreciate Jeffrey Sachs explaining all this.
@jieli45892 ай бұрын
If you read Chinese at all, China wants to be a ruthless hegemony. And CCP is not known for benevolent and just governance
@iwanagohome3262 ай бұрын
@@jieli4589I do read Chinese and I listen to great thinker like Prof Zhang Wei Wei....they are NOT ruthless Hegemon and never will be, all they want is moderate prosperity to its 1.4 billion citizens and to spread the wealth to the rest of the world, esp to poorer nations. Stop lying and fabricating stories.
@georwoogle2 ай бұрын
@@jieli4589You read Chinese? If you do, show evidence that supports your discourse.
@DarkSlayer0102 ай бұрын
@@jieli4589yes. Please enlighten us with evidence of your claims.
@whendays6592 ай бұрын
I agree. Mearsheimer is projecting western ideas about power onto China. Not everyone who gets power wields it like a psychopath.
@lavendereucalyptus32252 ай бұрын
A sincere, genuine, principled man of honesty and integrity, a rare gem! Prof Sachs, your existence is a blessing to world peace and humanity. 🙏❤️🙏
@strigoiu13Ай бұрын
there were some dreamers in the '20s-'30s of last century...they even declared war illegal back then...we all know what followed after these dreamers...
@evanhsu531Ай бұрын
My strong feeling is like this: John care only about Americans and Jeffrey cares more about all the human beings. Both are important, but the first prerequisite for being an American is being a human, isn't it?
@GainsParadise2 ай бұрын
This is freaking amazing! Thanks All In!!
@DaleYuzuki2 ай бұрын
These are voices that won’t be heard anywhere else - and I’m grateful their message is getting out. 👍
@GainsParadise2 ай бұрын
Exactly! 🎯
@blessedland0002 ай бұрын
thank you for making a great conversation between two American thinkers. i support prof Jeffery! I support PEACE.
@kibuukalawrence93702 ай бұрын
Jeff is such a treasure for the whole world his wise and honest views should have changed the world if those in power had the interest to listen! May God keep you safe Jeff!
Speak, clever men, speak! Huge thank you for spreading the truth!
@ewagarus27032 ай бұрын
Professor Sacks is so wise! Love his reasoning.
@kaylee86442 ай бұрын
Professor Sachs deserves respect for his knowledges and courage
@gloriacheon59522 ай бұрын
These gentlemen represent what True Americans should be. Good hearted, Educated, Reasonable Human beings.
@seymorefact43332 ай бұрын
reality...the US is Schizophrenia Anxiety Disorders Disruptive behaviour and dissocial disorders....in our policy abroad and at home! India is well aware that the bigger enemy is the USA. As the USA is trying to contain China... it will do the same when India becomes bigger than the USA.
@johnnywalker22202 ай бұрын
Except for the two on the left, especially the one on the far left
@Elfan97-ec1uk2 ай бұрын
Mearsheimer is a real hegemon!
@gloriacheon59522 ай бұрын
@@Elfan97-ec1uk I think so. But he is more realistic and open.
@Elfan97-ec1uk2 ай бұрын
@@gloriacheon5952 As compared to whom?
@alisonwu2097Ай бұрын
Totally agree with what professor Sachs said.
@Abdul-nt9uk2 ай бұрын
WOW! Two of the best thinkers on foreign policies.
@crazycat12322 ай бұрын
Well said. I wish these Mr. Mearsheimer and Mr. Sachs can become our national security advisors.
@Abdul-nt9uk2 ай бұрын
@@crazycat1232 Will not happen unfortunately. They are too rational and anti-war.
@Papa_bear_20462 ай бұрын
@@crazycat1232I think they would have a conflict of interest as they are already use idiots for Putin
@1Matik_2 ай бұрын
@@Papa_bear_2046ok bot
@Papa_bear_20462 ай бұрын
@@1Matik_ oh no... I got caught😉
@irinajosefson1822 ай бұрын
Jeffrey Sacks - BRAVO! My day is only meaningful if I have a chance to listen to Jeffery. Clear, reflecting realty, logical, rational, genius professor and, unfortunately, so naive. But he now submuts that he was naive in the past. I wish more people in the world listen to his opinion. He desperately tries to save the world, but not too many people really get that he is damn right about nuclear thread. The nukes really can ruin your day! Wake up, folks!
@thegreatrainman2336Ай бұрын
He has no sense of reality.
@jr23640Ай бұрын
@@thegreatrainman2336 Let me guess - you’re pro-Israel? 😂😂😂
@thegreatrainman2336Ай бұрын
@@jr23640 No but he has a fictional concept of the world. He doesn't understand it's a dog eat dog world always has been and always will be. And it's by design the universe has no concept of morality.
@thegreatrainman2336Ай бұрын
@@jr23640 No are you an Israel hater?
@DelMar-cz2kr2 ай бұрын
Jeffrey is an absolute legend! I wish more people in the US would watch talks like this and read his work. Well done All-In boys for inviting such a great intellectual to your show and for allowing such a rich dialogue. I love you guys!
@972veinАй бұрын
This was excellent. Thank you. Much respect to both of these men who I have listened to for some time.
@faiza12762 ай бұрын
Two great thinkers, and Jeff Sachs has all the qualities of a leader. What a leader, if only men like him actually ran the world
@thomasrogers91462 ай бұрын
AS AN AMERICAN BUSINESS MAN WHO HAVE TRAVELLED GLOBALLY AND BEEN TO CHINA MOST AMERICANS HAVE THIS OLD 1970 IMAGE OF CHINA WITH PEOPLE RIDING BICYCLES AND DRESSED THE SAME.. AS RAY DALLIO SAID, THIS IS THE FIRST TIME IN OUR HISTORY WE ARE FACING A NATION THAT IS OUT COMPETETING AND BEATING US IN SECTOR AFTER SECTOR. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME WE AMERICAN ARE GOING TO HAVE TO COMPLETE MAN TO MAN AGAINST A PEOPLE WE DEEM INFERIOR.MANY SANE AMERICANS WHO LIVED IN CHINA OR HAVE BEEN TO CHINA STAND WITH DR SACHS. THE CHINESE WILL CARE LESS WHAT 336 MILLION AMERICANS THINK. THEY ARE NOT CONSUMED BY ANTI AMERICAN DERANGEMENT SYNDROME. THEY ARE BUSY GETTING RICH TRADING WITH THE WORLD.I THIS INSANE IDEA THAT WORLD BELONGS TO AMERICA IS NOT ONLY DELUSIONAL BUT EXTREMELY NAUSISISTIC AND ECONOMICALLY DANGEROUS.
@simonhansen82052 ай бұрын
Why are your caps on? Is this the only way you feel that you can be heard? It's somewhat rude.
@08yallvon2 ай бұрын
46:21 'Insane idea the world belongs to America' comes not from American people but from individuals like V. Nuland. Before they were thinking 'the world belongs to communism (USSR), in what the USA had not agreed.
@anti-genocide2 ай бұрын
You missed an essential point : China is not considered a white country and the US is the last hope for the whites to stay in power ! and if you think I'm exaggerating just read what American politicians write about these matters .
@joeWANG-qg4nz2 ай бұрын
its true. man
@daksans67642 ай бұрын
@@anti-genocideYes US is the last and only white majority country that has hegemonic power and all other white majority countries want US to contain China
@kaineamachree49452 ай бұрын
I have to agree with every valid point that Prof. Jeffrey Sachs said. He speaks about the pros and cons of the underlying reality of American foreign policy.
@PhilPetrucciАй бұрын
You guys are amazing. Thanks
@tahiraru2 ай бұрын
I agree with Prof. Sachs, the world doesn't have to be a sea of sharks. This is what BRICS is doing, uniting great powers to trade and cooperate, not to fight wars. I hope one day the US and Europe join this peaceful block.
@dinoturn2 ай бұрын
Absolutely!
@Jerbert-qn4inАй бұрын
I agree with sachs...BBBUUT let's be careful with the over the board idealism. I also see that we can do better in the world, but it's not magic and based on just well intentioned thinking, i personally think we should find ways to make cooperation mutually beneficial, but it really has to be beneficial, humans won't stick to mere principles. The US today is dystopian, but let's not forget it's also very human. Meaning others in the same situation would likely come to similar outcomes. We humans need to get our act together though
@whateverwhateverdoevilgoog41322 ай бұрын
Thumbs up to Prof. Sachs!! thank you!
@mercedesebert6292 ай бұрын
Me too, LOVE the Words of PROF JEFFREY SACHS so Profound and Rational👍👍👍.
@joeyp19272 ай бұрын
The difference between Sachs and Mearsheimer on China comes down to the fact that Sachs has been to China almost every year since the mid 1980s--almost 40 years. He understands the character of the Chinese people, their focus.
@WilkinsMichael2 ай бұрын
I don't think either of them understand China that much. Someone who has lived there for decades or, heaven forbid, an actual Chinese person would be much better.
@ytbdebaba2 ай бұрын
No.That's not the real point.I am a Chinese. The difference between them is how they view the USA, not China. The point is where the USA going on. These lead to how they view China, but in fact they are just appearances. Power is so wonderful that it makes people crazy. What Americans should consider is why there are always challengers.How many times do it plan to play this cycle? Will there be a day when it can’t play anymore?This problem is different from what the Chinese face.What the Chinese are facing is another cycle
@ytbdebaba2 ай бұрын
@@WilkinsMichael correct. For Sachs, it is not necessary to fully understand China, he is a real world citizen
@tofatofa4722 ай бұрын
You do know that University of Chicago has a outpost in Beijing, right? You do know that John has lectured there since 2013, right? You do know his last visit was in 2019, right?! Well like Biggie rapped: AND IF YOU DON'T KNOW, NOW YOU KNOW. Ps: if you want to visit the Uni you can find it here: The University of Chicago Center in Beijing 20th floor Culture Plaza No. 59A Zhong Guan Cun Street Haidian District Beijing 100872 People’s Republic of China
@AbdulAli-ku9he2 ай бұрын
100%
@vl7920Ай бұрын
Sachs is such a brave man!
@foodparadise57922 ай бұрын
Professor Sachs got all my respect.
@iwanagohome3262 ай бұрын
@@Mixam-256He cares about peace and anybody would get upset when the American Neocons are hell bent to blow up the world