Electromagnetic radiation

Grade 10 Physical Sciences:
Electromagnetic radiation is a combination of electric and magnetic fields travelling in space. Since they are driven by the energy provided by the oscillating charge, electromagnetic waves travel with the same frequency as that of the oscillating charge.
Subscribe to Edukite Learning:
/ @edukitelearning
#Electromagnetic #radiation #PhysicalSciences #EdukiteLearning #edukite #SouthAfrica #CAPS #FET #Science #Grade10
#EMradiation
#electricfield #magneticfield

[@Jajs9917]

Super helpful I’ve been looking for better visualization of EM waves and this is it!

[@SteveAcomb]

1:20 Oh my god this graphic is PERFECT. That visualization was just a huge part in helping a specific fundamental thing about emag finally "click" for me. Thank you so much!

[@sachinvishaul9744]

So basically electromagnetic radiation is just a charge doing battle rope workout

[@i-m-alien]

rope dance

[@briansauk6837]

The fields do NOT "regenerate" each other. The fields are solely due to the original charge movements. What you observe far away from the charge is simply the time delayed E and B fields that were created as the charge(s) moved. I realize that this is almost universally taught, but it is not correct.

[@PinkeySuavo]

thank you! I didn't get the part of regenerating which some sources say. It makes sense that it's just the time delayed effect.

[@Yeshuaschild93]

You should do a video on blocking voice to skull or how voice to skull/ the frey affect works

[@steviemac2681]

Best visualisation I've seen. Thanks.

[@Evitax09]

Underrated video

[@hieudang1789]

It's very rare to see this animation 1:20 of electromagnetic propagation in 3d on youtube, they always shows the 2d and not all the field lines

[@PinkeySuavo]

ye, its annoying as hell, i try to visualise what actually EM looks like for past 2 days...

[@ProofDetectives]

Hello. Asslam o alikum. Thanks for video. The visuals looks great and helpful for understanding. Have a nice week to anyone reading this.

[@robertovalenzuela8860]

1:20 this is the best interpretation and visualization for EM :O

[@sherin7677]

Does EM waves present everywhere as full range with all types of waves? If an object absorb some visible light what does it mean? Does it mean that visible spectrum only incident the object and some Wavelengths are absorbed and some reflected?Or EM wave with full range hit that object first , and object absorbs only visible light ?

[@user-lq9oi5jq3n]

Awesome.

[@shantasingha8917]

Thank you sir thank you so much for clearing my doubts

[@siirmartin403]

Great visualization!

[@Byynx]

Not complete but still very helpful.

[@quandarkumtanglehairs4743]

An excellent visualization! Thank you. The proper description of transverse waves is that the undulations travel perpendicular to the force applied. We can also describe longitudinal waves as traveling along the force applied. We may use this statement to account for channeled, guided, polarized, or unidirectional beams, as it safely accommodates data-leakage, decoherence, and interference scenarios. This description accommodates application of a force as casual to its effect in surrounding mediums. Finally, this statement accommodate both empty and material spaces. It's "perpendicular to the direction of the" or "along the direction of the" force applied, NOT "vibration of particles" or "parallel to".

[@abdullahsaif3020]

But what is causing the propagation of the charge oscillation at different positions of the electric field line.......we know that in case of a rope the oscillation propagated to other position along it due to tension.....but what is here , some electric field line tension????

[@ghassenfatnassi3176]

maxwell equations

[@quandarkumtanglehairs4743]

The activating forces, in a natural space, are imagined as originating in the surrounding medium or from a discernable direction (to include ambient pressure and voltage).

[@quandarkumtanglehairs4743]

Think of orbitals and suborbitals as their own field. In a very rough, or macro, simplification of this field, the EM "dots" would be greater mass of an unbounded haze, while the nuclei of atoms would be tiny little point-sources of concentrated energy, like tiiiiiny little dots among an endless haze of other dots. This endless haze is composed of charged particles in the fermion, lepton, and quark families, while the tiiiiny little dots are composed of both charged and uncharged particles in the hadron, meson, boson, and other families. As fields, they ARE visible to us, but only in their outer form, and only in limited spatial range, and only in a limited spectral range, and only because photons are emitted from OTHER forces and waves WITHIN and ABOUT the fields such that they hit our eye mmmmbawlzzz my ninja Most of the field we do not directly see. It is within this greater hazy field, which we term the Electromagnetic Field, or EMF, the activating AND reacting forces originate or respond, either by compression and buildup of electrons in some area, the movement of electrons from one area to another, or the expression of magnetic field lines from corresponding materials (metals, usually). In a vacuum, gravity, light, dark energy, and inter- or extra-dimensional topological spacetime distributions (including distortions) themselves ARE this field through which phota and other energies propagate. In THIS context (energy propagation in a vacuum), when we talk about inter- and extra-dimensional topologies, we mean, literally, geometry, actual comprehensions of spaces within which our own may be composed. Comprehensions can here be understood to mean a full description of an apprehended reality; we apprehend (prehensile) this other reality by investigation (observation, induction, or deduction), and we compose and commune some larger and self-explanatory pattern about it...comprehend. In this extradimensional comprehension, what we term the Visible Universe is a liminal bounded space, but it is it's own curvature back into itself along each it's own axes, such that, from OUR PERSPECTIVE, two 'virtual' dimensions of 'ana' and 'kata' represent every point of this sphere moving into the center of all imagined spheres OF the sphere and also every point OVER the liminal edge meeting is conjugate on the "other side" of this same sphere. In this description of a self-unraveling extradimensional manifold, a particle is quite literally a conscious point of attention (vs attenuation) in compressed energetic filaments within and over this space, as the energies compressed at one end of the space are uncompressed at the other end, as they are both ends of a selfreferring filament curling in on itself in all directions... ... the compressions are matter and energy, and the decompressions are antimatter and virtual particle pair partners. Finally, in that cosmological sense, the original activating force is the Big Bang OR, in the Steady State perspective, the tensegrity of the "curling" boundary, vis a vi Time.

[@PinkeySuavo]

if you have charged objects like baloon and hair next to each other, do you feel kind of tension? There's rope, we just can't see it or do anything with it

[@lookupverazhou8599]

A spherical wavefront spreads out symmetrically into space. It encounters a particle. The entire spherical wavefront, across the entire space it takes up, is absorbed. How is this possible?

[@zakirhussain-js9ku]

While electric field of charge oscillates with the charge, the em waves don't propagate along electric field lines otherwise they will diminish as per inverse square law which applies to electric field strength. Moreover the electric & magnetic field trapped in sine wave of photons is not provided by the charge otherwise the charge would have weakend. I think the energy which goes into oscillating the charge is transferred to Space around the charge. This energy is trapped in photon sine wave as em field.

[@craigmoritz]

Great presentation!

[@kazmroz8948]

Missing: particles below the surface and throughout the volume, move in circles which are moving in plane a that is oriented in the direction of travel of the waves. This shows, quite graphically, that a wave is an artifact produced by the rotating particles. Artifacts are not useful ro be used transporting energy or as a prime force or anything, since they are, by definition, a by product. The precursor of this artifact or working force, is an ensembles of rotating particles, and is what is to be used as the mechanism for transporting energy. That is also the working mechanism in all quantum scale particles, and how particles transport their energy, be that a light or photon particle, electron, neutrino. See Randell Mills, author of Grand Unified Theory-Classical Physics. (not the Wikipedia article; that has been corrupted by influencers, whose purpose is to deny Mills and His Theory to compete with academically supported Standard Quantum Mechanics).

[@ANDROIDPOSTMORTEM]

Underrated video... ✨

[@evancole6863]

This is thought to be how gravity works

[@armenedmon]

Great visualization, my confusion is about the quantization of the phton, are there multiple or one photon emitting? it's hard to visualize the quality of the electromagnetic wave.

[@drewwolcott8268]

That’s the problem. It’s both or it’s hard to truly test. So we decided it’s both. Schrodinger‘s cat for now. But I think it we are kinda on the right track. If we’ve learned anything from Study in reality it ever more complex and understandable

[@user-de2pm7vr7y]

Thank you for making this video. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 I liked the churning type motion of the magnetic field lines at the end very much. 🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗

[@masudrana5886]

Gratitude

[@hamidfarmani5687]

According to the right-hand rule to determine the direction of the electric current and the magnetic field, here the direction of the magnetic field is opposite. Please correct it.

[@samuelds7255]

A regra da mão direita serve para a corrente convencional, ou seja do positivo pro negativo, mas o eletron em realidade sai do negativo para o positivo, então usamos a mão esquerda para saber de verdade a direção do campo magnetico

[@mukhtaarjaamac8763]

How they are perpendicular show visual

[@gregorykarimian3813]

He did

[@gagandeep.20]

Go back to time and ask maxwell how and tell him to show 👍

[@anitalayal9171]

Does charge loose it's own energy when em radiation carries energy??

[@nzuckman]

Exactly, it's almost a sort of friction

[@OhPuree42]

That is actually the reason we didn't understand how the atom could be made of electrons which orbit the nucleus. If electrons were orbiting like a planet they would need to be constantly accelerated toward the nucleus (for example the moon is accelerated toward the earth but don't fall on it because it has a lot of momentum in the perpendicular direction). If it was the case they would loose energy by emiting radiation and they would slow down and fall on the nucleus. Then we understood quantum mechanics, which is a lot more complicated but explains a lot.

[@Byynx]

In the case of an emitter antenna the electron still needs to leave the atoms that composes the antenna in order to continue to create the radiation right otherwise that Hertz experiment would never powered the other end that was not touching the source right ?

[@aadityaacharjee2924]

👍

[@jtxjgxgd]

This video is really underrated

[@rakesharora2522]

Thanks a lot

[@IIT24Aspirant]

Thanks

[@peterhart1966]

"You going with 110 or 220?" "Oh I'm thinking 115 or 120 will do it "

[@nc8002]

best animation tysm

[@newguy1612]

If a spinning magnet can levitate another magnet why can’t this wave levitate a magnet?

[@quandarkumtanglehairs4743]

They're the same force.

[@shubhammehta4938]

😮

[@peterhart1966]

"I was just thinking the same thing "

[@viktorrohleder-1324]

Viking

[@tomaskonopasek769]

energy is not transferred . Energy is generated by receiver by adjustment

[@sirishtadepalli4363]

Okay but that animation is still on a 2D plane. How does it look in 3d going in all directions?